MCCABE, ANDREW G. (DO) (FBI)
From:
MCCABE, ANDREW G. (DO) (FBI)
Sent:
Wednesday, May 11, 2016 1:51 PM
To:
PRIESTAP, E W. (CD) (FBI)
Cc:
COMEY, JAMES B. (DO) (FBI)
Subject:
RE: Midyear Exam — UNCLASSIFIED
Classification
: UNCLASSIFIED
Thanks very much Bill. Great feedback.
Andrew G. McCabe
Deputy Director
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Work:|j______p
Mobile
From: PRIESTAP, E W. (CD) (FBI)
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 7:17 PM
To: MCCABE, ANDREW G. (DO) (FBI)
Subject: RE: Midyear Exam — UNCLASSIFIED
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
I will be out of town next week, and so wanted to provide you my initial thoughts.
• The piece is superb.
• If anything, the Director may wish to add a sentence or two in his conclusion about the FBI's obligations
more generally. In other words, something not specifically about this case, but about what the FBI aims
to do in all of our cases. He could do this after the first sentence in his last paragraph. For example,
something like:
'The American people entrust the FBI with impartially investigating all matters of crime involving people
from all walks of life. We take that obligation extremely seriously, and" I can assure you that this
investigation was done competently, honestly, and independently. No outside influence of any
kind was brought to bear. I know there were many opinions expressed by people who were not
part of the investigation — including people in government - but none of that mattered to us.
Opinions are irrelevant, and they were all uninformed by insight into our investigation, because
we did the investigation in a professional way. Only facts matter, and the FBI found them here
in an entirely apolitical and professional way. I couldn't be prouder to be part of this
organization.
I suggest this only to emphasize the point that this investigation was conducted in a manner consistent
SJC000028
with the fairness aims of all of our investigations, (i.e., no one is above the law, etc.).
• The piece contains information that indicates the Secretary did not meet federal record requirements.
Before deciding on the final wording of such information, the Director may wish to have someone study
the impact his statements could have on any/all administrative inquiries relative to federal record
obligations. I suggest this only so he's aware of any potential fallout in that regard. I assume such
administrative inquiries aren't really a big deal, but if I was him I'd just want to be certain before
deciding on the final wording.
• I saw two typos on page 4, which I highlighted in red and yellow.
Thank you for sharing the below with me.
Bill
From: MCCABE, ANDREW G. (DO) (FBI)
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 5:32 PM
To: PRIESTAP, E W. (CD) (FBI); STRZOK, PETER P. (CD) (FBI); MOFFA, JONATHAN C. (CD) (FBI) (OGC)
(FBI)
Subject: FW: Midyear Exam — UNCLASSIFIED
Importance: High
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Folks:
The Director composed the below straw man in an effort to compose what a "final" statement might look like in
the context of a press conference. This was really more of an exercise for him to get his thoughts on the matter
in order, and not any kind of decision about venue, strategy, product, etc.
The Director asked me to share this with you four, but not any further . The only additional people who have
seen this draft are Jim Rybicki and Jim Baker. Please do not disseminate or discuss any further.
I do not know if the boss will want to discuss this at the Monday update but please review it before the meeting
just in case.
Thanks
Andrew G. McCabe
Deputy Director
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Work:
Mobile:
From: COMEY, JAMES B. (DO) (FBI)
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2016 7:15 PM
To: MCCABE, ANDREW G. (DO) (FBI); BAKER, JAMES A. (OGC) (FBI); RYBICKI, JAMES E. (DO) (FBI)
Cc: COMEY, JAMES B. (DO) (FBI)
Subject: Midyear Exam — UNCLASSIFIED
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
TRANSITORY RECORD
SJC000029
RYBICKI, JAMES E. (DO) (FBI)
From: RYBICKI, JAMES E. (DO) (FBI)
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 1:14 PM
To: COMEY, JAMES B. (DO) (FBI)
Subject: MYE — UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
Attachments: MYE thoughts 06-10-16.docx
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
DELIBERATIVE PROCESS PRIVILEGED DOCUMENT
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
SJC000030
I’ve been trying to imagine what it would look like if I decided to do an FBI
only press event to close out our work and hand the matter to DOJ. To help
shape our discussions of whether that, or something different, makes sense, I
have spent some time crafting what I would say, which follows. In my
imagination, I don’t see me taking any questions. Here is what it might look
like:
Good afternoon folks. I am here to give you an update on our investigation of
Secretary Clinton’s use of a private email system, which began in late August mid-
Julv .
After a tremendous amount of work, the FBI has completed its investigation and
has referred the case to the Department of Justice for a prosecutive decision. What
I would like to do today is tell you three things: (1) what we did; (2) what we
found; (3) what we have recommended to DOJ.
But I want to start by thanking the many agents, analysts, technologists, and other
FBI employees who did work of extraordinary quality in this case. Once you have
a better sense of how much we have done, you will understand why I am so
grateful and proud of their efforts.
So, first: what we have done over the last eight months.
The investigation began as a referral from the Intelligence Community Inspector
General in connection with Secretary Clinton’s use of a ^rivate[email server during
her time as Secretary of State, focused on whether classified information was
transmitted on that private system.
Our investigation focused on whether there is evidence that classified information
was improperly stored or transmitted on that private system, in violation of a
federal statute that makes it a felony to mishandle classified information either
intentionally or in a grossly negligent way, or a second statute that makes it a
misdemeanor to knowingly remove classified information from appropriate
systems or storage facilities.
Commented [pi]: Consider whether it is more appropriate to
call this a "personal" or "privately-owned" email server. "Private"
may denote a commercial email service, such as gmail or hotmail.
Use of these private commercial services was widespread at State
before and during her tenure.
Consistent with our counterintelligence responsibilities, we have also investigated
to determine whether there is evidence of computer intrusion in connection with
SJC000031
the private email server by any foreign power, or hackers on behalf of a foreign
power.
I have so far used the singular term, “email server,” in describing the referral that
began our investigation. It turns out to have been more complicated than that.
Secretary Clinton used several different servers and providers administrators of
those servers during her four years at the State Department, and used numerous
mobile devices to view and send email on that private domain. As new server s and
equipment s and providers were employed, older servers were taken out of service,
stored, and decommissioned in various ways. Piecing all of that back together to
gain as full an understanding as possible of the ways in which private email was
used for government work has been a painstaking undertaking, requiring thousands
of hours of effort.
For example, when one of Secretary Clinton’s original private servers was
decommissioned in 2013xx, the email software was removed. Doing that didn’t
remove the email content, but it was like removing the frame from a huge finished
jigsaw puzzle and dumping the pieces on the floor. The effect was that millions of
email fragments end up unsorted in the server’s un-used - or “slack” — space. We
searched went through all of it to see what was there, and what parts of the puzzle
could be put back together.
FBI investigators have also read all 34,000 of the approximately 30,000 emails
provided by Secretary Clinton to the State Department in spring 2015 December
2014 . Where an email was assessed as possibly containing classified information,
the FBI referred the email to ^fre- any U.S. government agency that was the-aTikely |
“owner” of the information in the email so that agency could make a determination
as to whether the email contained classified information at the time it was sent or
received, or whether there was reason to classify the email now, even if its content
was not classified at the time it was sent (this is the process sometimes referred to
as “up classifying”).
From that group of 34,000 30,000 emails that had been returned to the State
Department in late 2014#, the FBI sent xxxx emails to agencies for classification
determinations. Of those, xxxx have been determined by the owning agency to
contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Xxxx of
those contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; xxxx
contained Secret information at the time; and xxxx contained Confidential
information. Separate from those, a total of xxxx additional emails were “up
Commented [p2]:
( Commented [p3 ]: Some emails were sent to multiple agencies, j
Commented [p4]: Ultimately, the number of emails determined
to be classified will be a small percentage of those sent for review.
We think this point will need to be addressed by explaining that we
took an overly expansive and generous position in deciding what to
send out for review.
SJC000032
classified” to make them Secret or Confidential; the information in those had not
been classified at the time the emails were sent.
The FBI also discovered xxxx- several thousand work-related emails that were not
in the group of 31.000 30.000 that were returned by Secretary Clinton to State in
2014#. We found those additional emails in a variety of ways. Some had been
deleted over the years and we found traces of them on devices that supported or
were connected to the private email domain. Others we found by reviewing the
archived government email accounts of people who had been government
employees at the same time as Secretary Clinton, including high-ranking officials
at other agencies, with whom a Secretary of State might naturally correspond. This
helped us recover work-related emails that were not among the 34,000 30,000
produced to State. Still others we recovered from the laborious review of the
millions of email fragments dumped into the slack space of the server
decommissioned in 2013xx.
All told, we found xxx^ thousands of emails that were not among those produced
to the State Department last year in late 2014 . Of those, we assessed that xxxx
possibly contained classified information at the time they were sent or received and
so we sent them to other government agencies for classification determinations.
To date, agencies have concluded that xxxx of those were classified at the time
they were sent or received, xxx at the Secret level and xxxx at the Confidential
level. There were no additional Top Secret emails found. Finally, xxxx none of
those we found have since been “up classified.”
I should add here that we found no evidence that any of the additional work-related
emails we found were intentionally deleted in an effort to conceal them. Our
assessment is that, like many users of private email accounts, Secretary Clinton
periodically deleted emails or emails were purged from the system when devices
were changed. Because she was not using a government account, there was no
archiving of her emails, so it is not surprising that we discovered emails that were
not on Secretary Clinton’s system in 201 #4, when she produced the 34,000 30,000
emails to the State Department.
It could also be that some of the additional work-related emails we recovered were
among those deleted as “personal” by Secretary Clinton’s lawyers when they
reviewed and sorted her emails for production in 2014#. We have conducted
interviews and done technical examination to attempt to understand how that
sorting was done. Although we do not have complete visibility because we are not
fully able to reconstruct the electronic record of that sorting, we believe our
investigation has been sufficient to give us reasonable confidence there was no
intentional misconduct in connection with that sorting effort.
The lawyers doing the sorting for Secretary Clinton in 20145 did not individually
read the content of all of her tens of thousands of emails, as we did for those
available to us ; instead, they used search terms to try to find all work-related
emails among the reportedly more than 60,000 total emails remaining on Secretary
Clinton’s private system in 20154. It is highly likely their search terms missed
some work-related emails, and that we found them, for example, in the mailboxes
of other officials or in the slack space of a server. It is also likely that there are
other work-related emails that they did not produce to State and that we did not
find elsewhere, and that are now gone because they deleted all emails they did not
return to State, and the lawyers cleaned their devices in a such a way as to preclude
forensic recovery.
And, of course, in additional to our technical work, we interviewed many people,
from those involved in setting up and maintaining the various iterations of
Secretary Clinton’s private server to staff members with whom she corresponded
on email, to those involved in the email production to State, and finally, Secretary
Clinton herself.
Lastly, we have done extensive work with the assistance of our colleagues
elsewhere in the Intelligence Community to understand what indications there
might be of compromise by hostile actors in connection with the private email
operation.
That’s what we have done. Now let me tell you what we found.
Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues
intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is
evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive.
highly classified information. There is evidence to support a conclusion that
Secretary Clinton, and others, used the private email server in a manner that was
grossly negligent with respect to the handling of classified information. For
example, seven email chains concern matters that were classified at the TS/SAP
level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton
both sending emails about those matters and receiving emails from others about the
same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable
Formatted: Highlight
SJC000034
person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government
employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have
known that an unclassified system was no place for such an email conversation.
Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues
intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is
evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive,
highly classified information.
Similarly, In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found the sheer
volume of information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S.
Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on email (that is, excluding
the “up classified” emails) . This is especially concerning because all of these
emails were housed on servers not supported by full-time security staff, like those
found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government, supports an
inference that the participants were grossly negligent in their handling of that
information-
W hile not the focus of our investigation, w e also developed evidence that the
security culture of the State Department in general, and with respect to use of
unclassified email systems in particular, was generally lacking in the kind of care
for classified information found elsewhere in the government.
With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find
direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal email system, in its various
configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the
system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely
to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the
private commercial email accounts of individuals with whom Secretary Clinton
was in regular contact from her personal private account. We also assess that
Secretary Clinton’s use of a private personal email domain was both known by a
large number of people and readily apparent. Given that combination of factors,
we assess it is reasonably likely possible that hostile actors gained access to
Secretary Clinton’s private personal email account^
So that’s what we found.
Finally, with respect to our recommendation to the Department of Justice. In
our system, the prosecutors make the decisions about whether charges are
appropriate based on evidence the FBI has helped collect. Although we don’t
Commented [p5]:
SJC000035
normally make public our recommendations to the prosecutors, we frequently
make recommendations and engage in productive conversations with prosecutors
about what resolution may be appropriate, given the evidence. In this case, given
the importance of the matter, I think unusual transparency is in order.
In looking back at our investigations in similar circumstances, we cannot find a
case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases
prosecuted involved some combination of: (1) clearly intentional mishandling of
classified information; (2) vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to
support an inference of intentional misconduct; (3) indications of disloyalty to the
United States; or (4) efforts to obstruct justice. All charged cases of which we are
aware have involved the accusation that a government employee intentionally
mishandled classified information. We see none of that |here|.
Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the
handling of classified information, my judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor
would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before
bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the
evidence. But they must be balanced against things like the intent and context of
the person’s actions. To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar
circumstances, an individual who engaged in this activity would face NO
consequences. To the contrary, such individuals are often subject to security or
administrative sanctions. But that decision is not what is before me now.
Commented [p6]: We changed none of this text, we simply
reordered it. The original text is below, struck-out.
Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statute proscribing gross
negligence in the handling of classified information and of the statute proscribing
misdemeanor mishandling, my judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would
bring such a case. At the outset, we are not aware of a case where anyone has been
charged solely based on the “gross negligence” prohibition in the [ statute - -In
looking back at our investigations in similar circumstances, we cannot find a case
that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases
prosecuted involved some combination of: (1) clearly intentional misconduct; (2)
vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of
intentional misconduct; (3) indications of disloyalty to the United States; or ( 4 )
efforts to obstruct justice. We see none of that here.
Commented [p7]:
Accordingly, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters
such as this, I am completing the investigation by expressing to Justice my view
that no charges are appropriate in this case.
SJC000036
I know there will be intense public disagreement in the wake of this result, as there
was throughout this investigation. What I can assure the American people is that
this investigation was done competently, honestly, and independently. No outside
influence of any kind was brought to bear. I know there were many opinions
expressed by people who were not part of the investigation - including people in
government - but none of that mattered to us. Opinions are irrelevant, and they
were all uninformed by insight into our investigation, because we did the
investigation in a professional way. Only facts matter, and the FBI found them
here in an entirely apolitical and professional way. I couldn’t be prouder to be part
of this organization.
###
SJC000037
COMEY, JAMES B. (DO) (FBI)
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
COMEY, JAMES B. (DO) (FBI)
Thursday, June 30, 2016 9:50 AM
RYBICKI, JAMES E. (DO) (FBI)
Current draft — UNCLASSIFIED
MYE JBC June 30 2016.pdf
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
SJC000059
Good morning. I’m here to give you an update on the FBI’s investigation of
Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal email system during her time as Secretary of
State.
After a tremendous amount of work over the last year, the FBI has finished
its investigation and referred the case to the Department of Justice for a prosecutive
decision. What I would like to do today is tell you three things: what we did; what
we found; and what we have recommended to the Department of Justice.
This will be an unusual statement in at least a couple ways. First, I am going
to include more detail than I ordinarily would, because I think the American people
deserve those details in a case of intense public interest. Second, I have not
coordinated or reviewed this statement in any way with the Department of Justice
or any other part of the government. They do not know what I am about to say.
But I want to start by thanking the many FBI employees who did remarkable
work in this case. Once you have a better sense of how much we have done, you
will understand why I am so grateful and proud of their efforts.
So, first, what we have done:
The investigation began as a referral from the Intelligence Community
Inspector General in connection with Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal email
server during her time as Secretary of State. The referral focused on whether
classified information was transmitted on that personal system.
Our investigation looked at whether there is evidence that classified
information was improperly stored or transmitted on that personal system, in
violation of a federal statute that makes it a felony to mishandle classified
information either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way, or a second statute
that makes it a misdemeanor to knowingly remove classified information from
appropriate systems or storage facilities.
Consistent with our counter-intelligence responsibilities, we have also
investigated to determine whether there is evidence of computer intrusion in
connection with the personal email server by any foreign power, or other hostile
actors.
SJC000060
I have so far used the singular term, “email server,” in describing the referral
that began our investigation. It turns out to have been more complicated than that.
Secretary Clinton used several different servers and administrators of those servers
during her four years at the State Department, and used numerous mobile devices
to view and send email on that personal domain. As new servers and equipment
were employed, older servers were taken out of service, stored, and
decommissioned in various ways. Piecing all of that back together — to gain as full
an understanding as possible of the ways in which personal email was used for
government work — has been a painstaking undertaking, requiring thousands of
hours of effort.
For example, when one of Secretary Clinton’s original personal servers was
decommissioned in 2013, the email software was removed. Doing that didn’t
remove the email content, but it was like removing the frame from a huge finished
jigsaw puzzle and dumping the pieces on the floor. The effect was that millions of
email fragments end up unsorted in the server’s un-used - or “slack” - space. We
searched through all of it to see what was there, and what parts of the puzzle could
be put back together.
FBI investigators have also read all of the approximately 30,000 emails
provided by Secretary Clinton to the State Department in December 2014. Where
an email was assessed as possibly containing classified information, the FBI
referred the email to any U.S. government agency that was a likely “owner” of
information in the email, so that agency could make a determination as to whether
the email contained classified information at the time it was sent or received, or
whether there was reason to classify the email now, even if its content was not
classified at the time it was sent (that is the process sometimes referred to as “up-
classifying”).
From the group of 30,000 emails returned to the State Departmen
emails i email chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain
classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains
contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains
contained Secret information at the time; an contained Confidential information,
which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000
additional emails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information
in those had not been classified at the time the emails were sent.
The FBI also discovered several thousand work-related emails that were not
in the group of 30,000 that were returned by Secretary Clinton to State in 2014.
SJC000061
We found those additional emails in a variety of ways. Some had been deleted over
the years and we found traces of them on devices that supported or were connected
to the private email domain. Others we found by reviewing the archived
government email accounts of people who had been government employees at the
same time as Secretary Clinton, including high-ranking officials at other agencies,
people with whom a Secretary of State might naturally correspond. This helped us
recover work-related emails that were not among the 30,000 produced to State.
Still others we recovered from the laborious review of the millions of email
fragments dumped into the slack space of the server decommissioned in 2013.
With respect to the thousands of emails we found that were not among those
produced to State, agencies have concluded that xx of those were classified at the
time they were sent or received, x at the Secret level and xx at the Confidential
level. There were no additional Top Secret emails found. Finally, xx of those we
found have since been “up-classified.”
I should add here that we found no evidence that any of the additional work-
related emails were intentionally deleted in an effort to conceal them. Our
assessment is that, like many email users, Secretary Clinton periodically deleted
emails or emails were purged from the system when devices were changed.
Because she was not using a government account - or even a commercial account
like Gmail - there was no archiving at all of her emails, so it is not surprising that
we discovered emails that were not on Secretary Clinton’s system in 2014, when
she produced the 30,000 emails to the State Department.
It could also be that some of the additional work-related emails we
recovered were among those deleted as “personal” by Secretary Clinton’s lawyers
when they reviewed and sorted her emails for production in 2014.
The lawyers doing the sorting for Secretary Clinton in 2014 did not
individually read the content of all of her emails, as we did for those available to
us; instead, they relied on header information and used search terms to try to find
all work-related emails among the reportedly more than 60,000 total emails
remaining on Secretary Clinton’s personal system in 2014. It is highly likely their
search terms missed some work-related emails, and that we later found them, for
example, in the mailboxes of other officials or in the slack space of a server.
It is also likely that there are other work-related emails that they did not produce to
State and that we did not find elsewhere, and that are now gone because they
deleted all emails they did not return to State, and the lawyers cleaned their devices
in such a way as to preclude complete forensic recovery.
SJC000062
We have conducted interviews and done technical examination to attempt to
understand how that sorting was done by her attorneys. Although we do not have
complete visibility because we are not fully able to reconstruct the electronic
record of that sorting, we believe our investigation has been sufficient to give us
reasonable confidence there was no intentional misconduct in connection with that
sorting effort.
And, of course, in addition to our technical work, we interviewed many
people, from those involved in setting up and maintaining the various iterations of
Secretary Clinton’s personal server, to staff members with whom she corresponded
on email, to those involved in the email production to State, and finally, Secretary
Clinton herself.
Last, we have done extensive work to understand what indications there
might be of compromise by hostile actors in connection with the personal email
operation.
That’s what we have done. Now let me tell you what we found:
Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her
colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified
information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling
of very sensitive, highly classified information.
For example, seven email chains concern matters that were classified at the
Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received.
These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending emails about those matters
and receiving emails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to
support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or
in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding
about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place
for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also
found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence
Community at the time it was discussed on email (that is, excluding the later “up-
classified” emails).
None of these emails should have been on any kind of unclassified system,
but their presence is especially concerning because all of these emails were housed
on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like
SJC000063
those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government - or even with a
commercial service like Gmail.
Separately, it is important to say something about the marking of classified
information. Only a very small number of the emails containing classified
information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information. But
even if information is not marked “classified” in an email, participants who know
or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.
While not the focus of our investigation, we also developed evidence that the
security culture of the State Department in general, and with respect to use of
unclassified email systems in particular, was generally lacking in the kind of care
for classified information found elsewhere in the government.
With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not
find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal email system, in its various
configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the
system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely
to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the
private commercial email accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in
regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s
use of a personal email domain was both known by a large number of people and
readily apparent. She also used her personal email extensively while outside the
United States, including from the territory of sophisticated adversaries. That use
included an email exchange with the President while Secretary Clinton was on the
territory of such an adversary. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is
possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal email
account.
So that’s what we found. Finally, with respect to our recommendation to the
Department of Justice:
In our system, the prosecutors make the decisions about whether charges are
appropriate based on evidence the FBI has helped collect. Although we don’t
normally make public our recommendations to the prosecutors, we frequently
make recommendations and engage in productive conversations with prosecutors
about what resolution may be appropriate, given the evidence. In this case, given
the importance of the matter, I think unusual transparency is in order.
SJC000064
Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding
the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable
prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of
factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength
of the evidence, especially about intent. Responsible decisions also consider the
context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the
past.
In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of
classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal
charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of:
clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast
quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of
intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts
to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.
To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who
engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those
individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not
what we are deciding now.
As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on
matters like this, we are completing the investigation by expressing to Justice our
view that no charges are appropriate in this case.
I know there will be intense public debate in the wake of this
recommendation, as there was throughout this investigation. What I can assure the
American people is that this investigation was done competently, honestly, and
independently. No outside influence of any kind was brought to bear.
I know there were many opinions expressed by people who were not part of
the investigation - including people in government - but none of that mattered to
us. Opinions are irrelevant, and they were all uninformed by insight into our
investigation, because we did the investigation the right way. Only facts matter,
and the FBI found them here in an entirely apolitical and professional way. I
couldn’t be prouder to be part of this organization.
###
SJC000065
COMEY, JAMES B. (DO) (FBI)
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
COMEY, JAMES B. (DO) (FBI)
Thursday, June 30, 2016 4:24 PM
RYBICKI, JAMES E. (DO) (FBI)
Most recent 4:22 pm — UNCLASSIFI
MYE JBC June 30 2016 1622.pdf
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
SJC000073
Good morning. I’m here to give you an update on the FBI’s investigation of
Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal email system during her time as Secretary of
State.
After a tremendous amount of work over the last year, the FBI has finished
its investigation and is referring the case to the Department of Justice for a
prosecutive decision. What I would like to do today is tell you three things: what
we did; what we found; and what we are recommending to the Department of
Justice.
This will be an unusual statement in at least a couple ways. First, I am going
to include more detail than I ordinarily would, because I think the American people
deserve those details in a case of intense public interest. Second, I have not
coordinated or reviewed this statement in any way with the Department of Justice
or any other part of the government. They do not know what I am about to say.
I want to start by thanking the many FBI employees who did remarkable
work in this case. Once you have a better sense of how much we have done, you
will understand why I am so grateful and proud of their efforts.
So, first, what we have done:
The investigation began as a referral from the Intelligence Community
Inspector General in connection with Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal email
server during her time as Secretary of State. The referral focused on whether
classified information was transmitted on that personal system.
Our investigation looked at whether there is evidence that classified
information was improperly stored or transmitted on that personal system, in
violation of a federal statute that makes it a felony to mishandle classified
information either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way, or a second statute
that makes it a misdemeanor to knowingly remove classified information from
appropriate systems or storage facilities.
Consistent with our counter-intelligence responsibilities, we have also
investigated to determine whether there is evidence of computer intrusion in
connection with the personal email server by any foreign power, or other hostile
actors.
SJC000074
I have so far used the singular term, “email server,” in describing the referral
that began our investigation. It turns out to have been more complicated than that.
Secretary Clinton used several different servers and administrators of those servers
during her four years at the State Department, and used numerous mobile devices
to view and send email on that personal domain. As new servers and equipment
were employed, older servers were taken out of service, stored, and
decommissioned in various ways. Piecing all of that back together — to gain as full
an understanding as possible of the ways in which personal email was used for
government work — has been a painstaking undertaking, requiring thousands of
hours of effort.
For example, when one of Secretary Clinton’s original personal servers was
decommissioned in 2013, the email software was removed. Doing that didn’t
remove the email content, but it was like removing the frame from a huge finished
jigsaw puzzle and dumping the pieces on the floor. The effect was that millions of
email fragments end up unsorted in the server’s un-used - or “slack” - space. We
searched through all of it to see what was there, and what parts of the puzzle could
be put back together.
FBI investigators have also read all of the approximately 30,000 emails
provided by Secretary Clinton to the State Department in December 2014. Where
an email was assessed as possibly containing classified information, the FBI
referred the email to any U.S. government agency that was a likely “owner” of
information in the email, so that agency could make a determination as to whether
the email contained classified information at the time it was sent or received, or
whether there was reason to classify the email now, even if its content was not
classified at the time it was sent (that is the process sometimes referred to as “up-
classifying”).
From the group of 30,000 emails returned to the State Departmen
emails i email chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain
classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains
contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains
contained Secret information at the time; an contained Confidential information,
which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000
additional emails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information
in those had not been classified at the time the emails were sent.
The FBI also discovered several thousand work-related emails that were not
SJC000075
in the group of 30,000 that were returned by Secretary Clinton to State in 2014.
We found those additional emails in a variety of ways. Some had been deleted over
the years and we found traces of them on devices that supported or were connected
to the private email domain. Others we found by reviewing the archived
government email accounts of people who had been government employees at the
same time as Secretary Clinton, including high-ranking officials at other agencies,
people with whom a Secretary of State might naturally correspond. This helped us
recover work-related emails that were not among the 30,000 produced to State.
Still others we recovered from the laborious review of the millions of email
fragments dumped into the slack space of the server decommissioned in 2013.
With respect to the thousands of emails we found that were not among those
produced to State, agencies have concluded that xx of those were classified at the
time they were sent or received, x at the Secret level and xx at the Confidential
level. There were no additional Top Secret emails found. Finally, xx of those we
found have since been “up-classified.”
I should add here that we found no evidence that any of the additional work-
related emails were intentionally deleted in an effort to conceal them. Our
assessment is that, like many email users, Secretary Clinton periodically deleted
emails or emails were purged from the system when devices were changed.
Because she was not using a government account - or even a commercial account
like Gmail - there was no archiving at all of her emails, so it is not surprising that
we discovered emails that were not on Secretary Clinton’s system in 2014, when
she produced the 30,000 emails to the State Department.
It could also be that some of the additional work-related emails we
recovered were among those deleted as “personal” by Secretary Clinton’s lawyers
when they reviewed and sorted her emails for production in 2014.
The lawyers doing the sorting for Secretary Clinton in 2014 did not
individually read the content of all of her emails, as we did for those available to
us; instead, they relied on header information and used search terms to try to find
all work-related emails among the reportedly more than 60,000 total emails
remaining on Secretary Clinton’s personal system in 2014. It is highly likely their
search terms missed some work-related emails, and that we later found them, for
example, in the mailboxes of other officials or in the slack space of a server.
It is also likely that there are other work-related emails that they did not produce to
State and that we did not find elsewhere, and that are now gone because they
SJC000076
deleted all emails they did not return to State, and the lawyers cleaned their devices
in such a way as to preclude complete forensic recovery.
We have conducted interviews and done technical examination to attempt to
understand how that sorting was done by her attorneys. Although we do not have
complete visibility because we are not able to fully reconstruct the electronic
record of that sorting, we believe our investigation has been sufficient to give us
reasonable confidence there was no intentional misconduct in connection with that
sorting effort.
And, of course, in addition to our technical work, we interviewed many
people, from those involved in setting up and maintaining the various iterations of
Secretary Clinton’s personal server, to staff members with whom she corresponded
on email, to those involved in the email production to State, and finally, Secretary
Clinton herself.
Last, we have done extensive work to understand what indications there
might be of compromise by hostile actors in connection with the personal email
operation.
That’s what we have done. Now let me tell you what we found:
Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her
colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified
information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling
of very sensitive, highly classified information.
For example, seven email chains concern matters that were classified at the
Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received.
These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending emails about those matters
and receiving emails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to
support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or
in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding
about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place
for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also
found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence
Community at the time it was discussed on email (that is, excluding the later “up-
classified” emails).
SJC000077
None of these emails should have been on any kind of unclassified system,
but their presence is especially concerning because all of these emails were housed
on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like
those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government - or even with a
commercial service like Gmail.
Separately, it is important to say something about the marking of classified
information. Only a very small number of the emails containing classified
information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information. But
even if information is not marked “classified” in an email, participants who know
or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.
While not the focus of our investigation, we also developed evidence that the
security culture of the State Department in general, and with respect to use of
unclassified email systems in particular, was generally lacking in the kind of care
for classified information found elsewhere in the government.
With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not
find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal email domain, in its various
configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the
system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely
to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the
private commercial email accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in
regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s
use of a personal email domain was both known by a large number of people and
readily apparent. She also used her personal email extensively while outside the
United States, including from the territory of sophisticated adversaries. That use
included an email exchange with another senior government official while
Secretary Clinton was in the territory of such an adversary. Given that
combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to
Secretary Clinton’s personal email account.
So that’s what we found. Finally, with respect to our recommendation to the
Department of Justice:
In our system, the prosecutors make the decisions about whether charges are
appropriate based on evidence the FBI has helped collect. Although we don’t
normally make public our recommendations to the prosecutors, we frequently
make recommendations and engage in productive conversations with prosecutors
SJC000078
about what resolution may be appropriate, given the evidence. In this case, given
the importance of the matter, I think unusual transparency is in order.
Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding
the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable
prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of
factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength
of the evidence, especially about intent. Responsible decisions also consider the
context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the
past.
In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of
classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal
charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of:
clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast
quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of
intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts
to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.
To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who
engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those
individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not
what we are deciding now.
As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on
matters like this, we are completing the investigation by expressing to Justice our
view that no charges are appropriate in this case.
I know there will be intense public debate in the wake of this
recommendation, as there was throughout this investigation. What I can assure the
American people is that this investigation was done competently, honestly, and
independently. No outside influence of any kind was brought to bear.
I know there were many opinions expressed by people who were not part of
the investigation - including people in government - but none of that mattered to
us. Opinions are irrelevant, and they were all uninformed by insight into our
investigation, because we did the investigation the right way. Only facts matter,
and the FBI found them here in an entirely apolitical and professional way. I
couldn’t be prouder to be part of this organization.
###
SJC000079
COMEY, JAMES B. (DO) (FBI)
From:
COMEY, JAMES B. (DO) (FBI)
Sent:
Monday, May 02, 2016 7:15 PM
To:
MCCABE, ANDREW G. (DO) (FBI); BAKER, JAMES A. (OGC) (FBI); RYBICKI, JAMES E.
(DO) (FBI)
Cc:
COMEY, JAMES B. (DO) (FBI)
Subject:
Midyear Exam — UNCLASSIFIED
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
TRANSITORY RECORD
I’ve been trying to imagine what it would look like if I decided to do an FBI only press event
to close out our work and hand the matter to DOJ. To help shape our discussions of whether
that, or something different, makes sense, I have spent some time crafting what I would say,
which follows. In my imagination, I don’t see me taking any questions. Here is what it might
look like:
Good afternoon folks. I am here to give you an update on our investigation of Secretary' Clinton's use
of a private email system, which began in late August.
After a tremendous amount of work, the FBI has completed its investigation and has referred the case
to the Department of Justice for a prosecutive decision. What I would like to do today is tell you
three things: (1) what we did; (2) what we found; (3) what we have recommended to DOJ.
But I want to start by thanking the many agents, analysts, technologists, and other FBI employees who
did work of extraordinary' quality in this case. Once you have a better sense of how much we have
done, you will understand why I am so grateful and proud of their efforts.
So, first: what we have done over the last eight months.
The investigation began as a referral from the Intelligence Community' Inspector General in
connection with Secretary' Clinton's use of a private email server during his time as Secretary' of State,
focused on whether classified information was transmitted on that private system.
Our investigation focused on whether there is evidence that classified information was improperly
stored or transmitted on that private system, in violation of a federal statute that makes it a felony to
mishandle classified information either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way, or a second statute
that makes it a misdemeanor to remove classified information from appropriate systems or storage
facilities.
Consistent with our counterintelligence responsibilities, we have also investigated to determine
whether there is evidence of computer intrusion in connection with the private email server by any
foreign power, or hackers on behalf of a foreign power.
T V.
**-4-V%
4 --
SJC000140
i nave su xai u^eu me smguiai leim. email server, m uesunumg me leienai mat uegau uui
investigation. It turns out to have been more complicated than that. Secretary Clinton used several
different servers and providers of those servers during her four years at the State Department, and used
numerous mobile devices to view and send email on that private domain. As new servers and providers
were employed, older servers were taken out of service, stored, and decommissioned in various ways.
Piecing all of that back together to gain as full an understanding as possible of the ways in which
private email was used for government work has been a painstaking undertaking, requiring thousands of
hours of effort.
For example, when one of Secretary' Clinton's original private servers was decommissioned in 20xx.
the email software was removed. Doing that didn’t remove the email content, but it was like removing
the frame from a huge finished jigsaw puzzle and dumping the pieces on the floor. The effect was that
millions of email fragments end up unsorted in the server’s un-used - or "slack” - space. We went
through all of it to see what was there, and what parts of the puzzle could be put back together.
FBI investigators have also read all 34.000 emails provided by Secretary' Clinton to the State
Department in spring 2015. Where an email was assessed as possibly containing classified
information, the FBI referred the email to the U.S. government agency that was the likely “owner” of
the information in the email so that agency could make a determination as to whether the email
contained classified information at the time it was sent or received, or whether there was reason to
classify the email now. even if its content was not classified at the time it was sent (this is the process
sometimes referred to as “up classifying”).
From that group of 34.000 emails that had been returned to the State Department in 2015. the FBI sent
xxxx emails to agencies for classification determinations. Of those, xxxx have been determined to
contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Xxxx of those contained
information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; xxxx contained Secret information at the
time; and xxxx contained Confidential information. Separate from those, a total of xxxx additional
emails were up classified” to make them Secret or Confidential; the information in those had not
been classified at the time the emails were sent.
The FBI also discovered xxxx work-related emails that were not in the group of 34.000 that were
returned by Secretary' Clinton to State in 2015. We found those additional emails in a variety of ways.
Some had been deleted over the years and we found traces of them on devices that supported or were
connected to the private email domain. Others we found by reviewing the archived government email
accounts of people who had been government employees at the same time as Secretary' Clinton,
including high-ranking officials at other agencies, with whom a Secretary' of State might naturally
correspond. This helped us recover work-related emails that were not among the 34.000 produced to
State. Still others we recovered from the laborious review of the millions of email fragments dumped
into the slack space of the server decommissioned in 20xx.
All told, we found xxxx emails that were not among those produced to the State Department last year.
Of those, we assessed that xxxx possibly contained classified information at the time they were sent
or received and so we sent them to other government agencies for classification determinations. To
date, agencies have concluded that xxxx of those were classified at the time thev were sent or
received, xxx at the Secret level and xxxx at the Confidential level. There were no additional Top
Secret emails found. Finally, none of those we found have since been up classified.”
I should add here that we found no evidence that any of the additional work-related emails we found
were intentionally deleted in an effort to conceal them. Our assessment is that, like many users of
private email accounts. Secretary' Clinton periodically deleted emails or emails were purged from the
SJC000141
system when devices were changed. Because she was not using a government account, there was no
archiving of her emails, so it is not surprising that we discovered emails that were not on Secretary'
Clinton’s system in 2015. when she produced the 34 ; 000 emails to the State Department.
It could also be that some of the additional work-related emails we recovered were among those
deleted as 'personal” by Secretary' Clinton s lawyers when they reviewed and sorted her emails for
production in 2015. We have conducted interviews and done technical examination to attempt to
understand how that sorting was done. Although we do not have complete visibility' because we are not
fully able to reconstruct the electronic record of that sorting, we believe our investigation has been
sufficient to give us reasonable confidence there was no intentional misconduct in connection with
that sorting effort.
The lawyers doing the sorting for Secretary' Clinton in 2015 did not individually read tens of thousands
of emails, as we did; instead, they used search terms to try to find all work-related emails among the
more than 60.000 total emails remaining on Secretary' Clinton’s private system in 2015. It is highly
likely their search terms missed some work-related emails, and that we found them, for example, in
the mailboxes of other officials or in the slack space of a server. It is also likely that there are other
work-related emails that they did not produce to State and that we did not find elsewhere, and that are
now gone because they deleted all emails they did not return to State, and the lawyers cleaned their
devices in a such a way as to preclude forensic recovery.
And. of course, in additional to our technical work, we interviewed many people, from those involved
in setting up and maintaining the various iterations of Secretary Clinton’s private server to staff
members with whom she corresponded on email, to those involved in the email production to State,
and finally. Secretary Clinton herself.
Lastly, we have done extensive work with the assistance of our colleagues elsewhere in the
Intelligence Community' to understand what indications there might be of compromise by hostile
actors in connection with the private email operation.
That’s what we have done. Now let me tell you what we found.
There is evidence to support a conclusion that Secretary Clinton, and others, used the private email
server in a manner that was grossly negligent with respect to the handling of classified information.
For example, seven email chains concern matters that were classified at the TS/SAP level when they
were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending emails about those
matters and receiving emails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a
conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary' Clinton’s position, or in the positon of those
government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that
an unclassified system was no place for such an email conversation. Although we did not find clear
evidence that Secretary' Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of
classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very'
sensitive, highly classified information.
Similarly, the sheer volume of information that was properly classified as Secret at the time it was
discussed on email (that is. excluding the "up classified” emails) supports an inference that the
participants were grossly negligent in their handling of that information.
We also developed evidence that the security' culture of the State Department in general, and with
respect to use of unclassified email systems in particular, was generally lacking in the kind of care for
/•* 1 a o r> t alomtrlviaria flva At f
SJC000142
imaaiucu miuiiiiaiiuii iuuiiu ciaovucic m me guvciiniieui.
With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that
Secretary' Clinton's personal email system, in its various configurations since 2009. was successfully
hacked. But. given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we
would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the
private email accounts of individuals with whom Secretary' Clinton was in regular contact from her
private account. We also assess that Secretary' Clinton's use of a private email domain was both
known by a large number of people and readily apparent. Given that combination of factors, we asses
it is reasonably likely that hostile actors gained access to Secretary' Clinton's private email account.
So that’s what we found.
Finally, with respect to our recommendation to the Department of Justice. In our system, the
prosecutors make the decisions about whether charges are appropriate based on evidence the FBI has
helped collect. Although we don't normally make public our recommendations to the prosecutors, we
frequently make recommendations and engage in productive conversations with prosecutors about
what resolution may be appropriate, given the evidence. In this case, given the importance of the
matter. I think unusual transparency is in order.
Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statute proscribing gross negligence in the
handling of classified information and of the statute proscribing misdemeanor mishandling, my
judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. At the outset, we are not aware of
a case where anyone has been charged solely based on the ''gross negligence” prohibition in the
statute. All charged cases of which we are aware have involved the accusation that a government
employee intentionally mishandled classified information. In looking back at our investigations in
similar circumstances, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these
facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: (1) clearly intentional misconduct; (2)
vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional
misconduct; (3) indications of disloyalty to the United States; or (4) efforts to obstruct justice. We
see none of that here.
Accordingly, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters such as this. I am
completing the investigation by expressing to Justice my view that no charges are appropriate in this
case.
I know there will be intense public disagreement in the wake of this result, as there was throughout this
investigation. What I can assure the American people is that this investigation was done competently,
honestly, and independently. No outside influence of any kind was brought to bear. I know there were
many opinions expressed by people who were not part of the investigation — including people in
government - but none of that mattered to us. Opinions are irrelevant, and they were all uninformed
by insight into our investigation, because we did the investigation in a professional way. Only facts
matter, and the FBI found them here in an entirely apolitical and professional way. I couldn't be
prouder to be part of this organization.
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
SJC000143
nizations" :J],"numbers
nizations":D,"numbers
numbers
firstName
tNameVF
nteatrons";[;,"numbers
firstNameVPeteryias
nteations"
S'rfS &T»??
s i' =°^
S <U o In _C H
T; =3 cj. «_ (u = M
% f £ $: !“■
9 =« g 5 - issB
ISg g%afi
£ § 11 £ .8 ?
s to <C w VI C *gg 1
IS? fII ■ s :
Sis =ia ?■ §>
SSi-W.! f| 1
1 a z is sf.l 1
s » s | e 3 r-1H -6
aS £ 5 a-E=r?B— =t
«3 S _
J£ C «
O 5* Q
5? %
p
S°1
"u>
‘5
E
I' cf
^ s «
£1
a§ u
a cn g
c “■ - * M w H
®H's"
2 ™ tJ n
3
8
o
N
mQd{Red' , :14S80179
Isms
filiations''^.“numbers
K"modifted“:14688902
firstName'V'PelerV'las
[{"modified
modified“:14695779
modlfled":14695789
moctifled":14708768
1NNECT10N!
( 202 )
nizations":[]," numbers
rmodifie<r.l47255Q3
202
modified":14736795
modified":147S1116
Q/'numbers
firstNameV Peter Vlas
firstName 1
numbers
(("modified
iorn)
mofflffed“:14772673
The article is riot behind a paywaltVnVnWe g e t several hours
modified’ 1 :14772676
I AM beinefairaboutltus. I asked you not to. 1 don't care
that^Bjucks. 1) This. Is about trust, and 2} WHAT THE F
DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE TO ANYONE ON THE TEAM? Is
Strznk","notes":[l,“o r ga
nizatlon5*;||,"numbers"
[{ u modified"^4776032
sms
Dude. Or Inauguration Day, in addition to ourkegger we
numbers
□/numbers
Analogous to the public editor article Bill handed out
2016-11-13
Strzok-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2015-08-21
17:30:50, Fri
INBOX
Hi. Just got done with meeting now to working lunch. Starting working
out of hq on Mon. Not kidding. Much more later of course
2015-08-21
17:34:45, Fri
2015-08-21
17:39:01, Fri
2015-08-21
17:4 5:25 , Fri
2015-08-21
18:20:55, Fri
2015-08-21
19:25:32, Fri
2015-08-21
19:30:38 , Fri
2015-08-21
19:35:41, Fri
2015-08-21
19:41:18 , Fri
2015-08-21
19:42:57, Fri
2015-08-21
19:43:49, Fri
2015-08-21
19:49:42, Fri
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
iOUTBOX
Whoa. What?!
Yeah, surprise to me to. Taking over special. Sorry can't text now,
should be able to in about an h our. Met Trisha. _
special you mean? Understood re timing. Sorry for all the
questions._
Maybe we can talk in the car when you are free. So long as it is 100%
work si nce he'll be ri ght next to me. _
Still meetings. Sorry. Not The one I griped about hq running.
Sure will call in a bit, will check here first. _
I know it's a total s-show, but still. I'm proud of you.
\U000_lf636_ _
Kind of ridiculously hugely so. \U0001f636\U0001f636\U0001f636
\U0001f636\U0001f636\U0001f636
Just call when you do get free. I'll just act surprised to hear from you.
■ Why am I calling? See if you want to work on it when you get back?
2015-08-21
20:22:27, Fri
INBOX
2015-08-21
20:59:03, Fri
OUTBOX
2015-08-22
14:25:55, Sat
OUTBOX
2015-08-22
14:29:29, Sat
OUTBOX
2015-08-23
00:16:16, Sun
INBOX
2015-08-23 ■
00:17:18, Sun
OUTBOX
2015-08-23
00:18:18, Sun
INBOX
2015-08-23
00:19:34, Sun
OUTBOX
2015-08-23
00:20:29, Sun
INBOX
Just to give the news?
Hi there. Good to call?
right?
Truly. Soooo proud.
\U0001f636\U0001f636\U0001f636\U0001f636\U0001f636
And of course send me articles that you find helpful/iliuminating to
learn about the topic. \U0001f636_
Sigh. Hi. Sitting here reading affidavits. Happy to be engaged in work
again...\u263a _
I'm soooo happy for you. \U0001f60a Who's affidavit.
\U0001f636\n\nNo. Who's
Blech. ;)\n\nSure, \n\nNo, this is ours.
13
DOJ-PROD-OOOOOOI
Strzok-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2015-08-23
17:08:09, Sun
INBOX
1 do too!!!! 1 want you back from and TDYed to the
team sc and can get back to their regular work, you can
interface with and all these other ahole lawyers.
2015-08-23
17:08:24, Sun
INBOX
2015-08-23
18:09:19, Sun
INBOX
Hi there! Yes, though he's not an "excited" sort of guy
OUTBOX
How do you know him again? Was he on your squad back in the day?
2015-08-23
18:13:04, Sun
INBOX
Dang that's a long drive.\n\n Pretty much knew him by reputation
only he was a crim agent and then on for a while.
2015-08-23
18:14:47, Sun
OUTBOX
That's a lot of confidence to pull as your ssa, although 1 guess you've
seen him as a supervisor for a few months now. \n\r
2015-08-23
18:17:05, Sun
Yeah, though more important is his agent and analytic corps and they
are solid. He's got the right personality to herd a bunch of
detailees/TDYers, though 1 don't know that we'll have to do that.
2015-08-23
18:17:38, Sun
INBOX
2015-08-23
21:33:15, Sun
OUTBOX
Excited about work tomorrow? Are you going into
vour office or iust straight to HQ?
2015-08-23
21:39:09, Sun
INBOX
Some, also some apprehension, of
course.\n\nWf first, do 8:30 with Andy then to HQ. Pick up a billion
people and drive to State for 10:30 meeting with AS of DS
2015-08-23
21:42:25, Sun
OUTBOX
Oh man, that's right, you're acting SAC. Are you still?
2015-08-23
INBOX
No. Gregg was willing to go either way. 1 told him I thought 1 needed
21:47:21, Sun
to be focused at HQ. Might end up being able to do both but I think
probably not. \n\nl'm doing tomorrow's 8:30 (essentially to brief and
ask for a couple of analysts and a couple of cyber people), then Aaron
has the helm.
2015-08-23
OUTBOX
Got it. Makes sense.
23:12:20, Sun
2015-08-23
23:52:38, Sun
INBOX
I know I can't tomorrow, but I’ll do my darndest the next two days.
Currently there are no meetings
I'm aware of on either Tues or Wed.
2015-08-24 INBOX
00:02:45, Mon I
I have a briefing from 2 till likely 4/4:30\n\nlmsg?
2015-08-24
00:03:57, Mon
INBOX
And a 4:20 with Randy, I
14
DOJ-PROD-0000002
Strzok-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2015-08-24
00:04:31, Mon
10UTB0X
Yes, 1 can imsg.
2015-08-24
00:05:55, Mon
UNBOX
Ok. May have time depending on when State mtg gets done, before
my 2...but that's not at all certain.
2015-08-24
11:02:56, Mon
OUTBOX
Hi there. No dawdling for you this morning! Sorry for the delay, went
for a walk with
2015-08-24
11:15:13, Mon
INBOX
Already driving. How was the walk with 5 1 like having her on the
team, but I was discouraged that she was so busy she was going to
have or somebody else start covering for her
sometimes.\n\nDespite my personal interaction with him. I'm just not
sure about his temperament in this project.
2015-08-24
11:17:53, Mon
OUTBOX
No you're right. He's a petulant baby (remind me to tell you his latest
fit with her). She's being told that this new case (that's all she would
say to me), followed by dead people.
So I'd be surprised if she hands off too much to him. More that she's
going to have to let him handle more of which she doesn't really
want to do.
2015-08-24
11:19:44, Mon
OUTBOX
She told me he wasn't read in to it yet, though he was aware of it.
2015-08-24
11:23:21, Mon
INBOX
Yeah, and he already spilled the beans to my people. That's how 1 first
found out.\n\nThe light blue tie with this thin dark blue stripe running
across it
2015-08-24
11:24:43, Mon
OUTBOX
Ah, yes. 1 didn't know it had a name. :)\n\nThat's aggravating. You
should say something to
2015-08-24
11:52:23, Mon
INBOX
Rgr. At work, going to be lOOmph for a while
2015-08-25
11:34:59, Tue
OUTBOX
1
What do you have after your briefing this morning?
2015-08-25
11:48:30, Tue
INBOX
The bulk of my day is going to be spent trying to scratch up resources.
Particularly personnel outside of CD.
2015-08-25
11:59:20, Tue
OUTBOX
You ID your cyber and cart agents yet?
2015-08-25
12:01:15, Tue
INBOX
1 have. Wf cyber may not agree. 1 get to play the escalate it up the
chain of command game today
2015-08-25
12:08:08, Tue
OUTBOX
Will Andy side with you you think?
2015-08-25
12:13:40, Tue
INBOX
Oh, he has and he will. This is just foot dragging by And nothing
angers an asac more than going to an sac, and nothing angers an SAC
more than going to his adic. So 1 need to try and finesse it but my time
to oissoff issiort...
2015-08-25
14:18:40, Tue
INBOX
^^gjg^*^ayayMaBBn\nAlso, heading to wf to shake the
resource tree, \n\n5till good for lunch?
2015-08-25 INBOX No but stills!\n\nLeaving Jeh now...sigh...
23:13:09, Tue_
15
DOJ-PROD-0000003
Strzok-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2015-08-25
23:13:53, Tue
OUTBOX
Boo for you. \U0001f615 Why so late?
2015-08-25
23:14:56, Tue
INBOX
Affidavit and housekeeping
2015-08-26
01:30:51, Wed
OUTBOX
Your stupidass 8:30 meeting means and 1 have to go back to
meeting at 5:45 for our walk. \U0001f61b
2015-08-26
01:40:59, Wed '
OUTBOX
No, stupidass is your meeting, I've already explained that. Do 1 need
to go slower? \U0001f618
2015-08-26
01:41:27, Wed
OUTBOX
Dumb work.
2015-08-26
01:41:50, Wed
INBOX
1 ™.~ r ~ .^
i
2015-08-26
01:50:54, Wed
INBOX
1 will reserve my sad pathetic petulant inappropriate response for
elsewhere. \n\nOr, better yet, have the dignity not to at all.
\U0001f614\n\nWill be up for a while with affidavit if you can imsg
2015-08-27
11:35:59, Thu
OUTBOX
Aargh. 1 just called the BOC for a temp pass and the dude said 1
needed a UC to send the request. Sigh, the inconsistency...
11:38:01, Thu
2015-08-27
12:13:44, Thu
2015-08-27
12:13:50, Thu
INBOX
And heading into sioc now...
2015-08-27
OUTBOX
I'll try.
12:20:22, Thu
But I'll try.
2015-08-27
INBOX
NR. Sounds like DD going to stop by our space around 2:30 so just as
15:05:02, Thu
well. Ok to imsg?
2015-08-27
19:12:04, Thu
OUTBOX
Mtg with andy
2015-08-27
OUTBOX
Hilariously, Andy's suggestion was that 1 should be tdyed to the thing
19:58:08, Thu
you’re working on. Totally his idea.
16
DOJ-PROD-OOOOOCI4
Strzok-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2015-08-27
20:23:26, Thu
INBOX
Of course 1 want to talk all about it. Will end up
ok...\n\nl have 430 with Randy, will let you know when done\n\nAnd
Holy sh*t yes!!! is way.way burdened. Only thing 1 don't know is
what workload will look like I'm a month, \u263a
2015-08-27
21:04:45, Thu
INBOX
Hey there. I'm done
2015-08-27
21:07:50, Thu
INBOX
Heading back into sioc for a bit
2015-08-27
21:57:05, Thu
OUTBOX
Hi there. Dad HH, so probably can't talk tonight. 1 sent Jim and Trisha
a couple of extra thoughts, maybe 1 shouldn't have but I did. Will
forward.
2015-08-27
22:15:24, Thu
INBOX
Given that all 1 want to do is sit and talk with you about the
conversation and the path ahead.
2015-08-27
23:15:48, Thu
OUTBOX
Hi. Thanks for listening. Really don't know what to do.
2015-08-27
23:21:59, Thu
INBOX
Of course. Would have killed me not to hear it. Something will come.
It's not going to be a happy comfortable time until it does, but things
work out for really talented people like you. \U0001f636
2015-08-28
00:03:40, Fri
OUTBOX
still at work. And can't walk tomorrow be she's going in early.
2015-08-28
01:50:56, Fri
OUTBOX
Sorry about the delay. Had a long conversation with the woman
(seems really promising),
2015-08-28
02:13:16, Fri
INBOX
Promised
everyone, especially a Bullfrog bagel for staying so late on our
stuff.
2015-08-28
11:14:05, Fri
OUTBOX
Meh. Not really. 1 am just 100% positive that nothing is going to get
resolved before 1 am back to work. 1 mean, there are only 5 weeks left
before I'm back.:(
2015-08-28
11:17:06, Fri
INBOX 1
I'm sure something interesting will come up. If not what I'm doing,
there will be something that emerges between now and then. That's
not much comfort for you though.
2015-08-28
11:17:47, Fri
INBOX
Plus, I'm willing to bet that Andy can identify something for you to do
between now and then. Did you two talk about that at all? 1 mean you
working for him in his current capacity?
2015-08-28
11:19:26, Fri
OUTBOX
No. 1 hoped that he would, but he didn't bring it up and I'm not going
to ask again. 1 guess it's still early - there's not even a computer in his
office.
2015-08-28
11:26:26, Fri
INBOX
Yeah. Look, he hasn't even started the job. And it's tough to slot you
again something when you're not back yet. Having you in house is
absolutely going to make it easy to say hey plug you into this project.
2015-08-28
11:26:41, Fri
INBOX
Where is he sitting? 1 still haven't had a chance to talk to him about
the 3:02s
17
DOJ-PROD-0000005
Strzok-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message Body
2015-08-28
11:36:20, Fri
2015-08-28
11:57:55, Fri
2015-08-28
12:00 :29, Fri
2015-08-28
12:02:59, Fri
2015-08-28
12:03:49, Fri
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
He's not yet. But I met up with him in
Think he just c omes over for rrrtgs._
old office yesterday.
Just ran into JB and chatted a bit.
i Did you tell him needs help?
foundation. Said Trisha and
they're overworked...:)
n\nAnd started laying the
ad been great. Next step is
\U0001f621 for including
2015-08-28
12:03:53, Fri
2015-08-28
12:05:02, Fri
2015-08-29
15:06:38, Sat
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
Heading Heading into sioc. Tty!
Did you get laid yesterday? I didn't, am concerned that someone
forgot to validate my time or something. \U0001f621
2015-08-29
15:06:59, Sat
OUTBOX
Ha. That is funny. Paid, not laid. \U0001f60a
2015-08-29
OUTBOX
1 And suddenly I'm in a really sour mood. Not sure why exactly. Maybe
15:23:19, Sat
the prospect of calling re my paycheck on Monday.
2015-08-29
INBOX
Not sure why as it normally hits on Friday. Sometimes
15:43:30, Sat
it shows up later in the weekend as having arrived on Fri, but nothing
there now. got hers as normal on Thurs. Because we (Bu) suck.
2015-08-29
OUTBOX
15:47:13, Sat
2015-08-29
INBOX
18:05:14, Sat
>®n\nAnd
hi. Just got back from .. was there; saw him but didn't
meet him.
2015-08-30
14:31:36, Sun
INBOX
Also, irritatingly, my unet password just expired so 1 can't get emails
until 1 update it tomorrow. \U0001f62c so either text me or hit me on
gtwn...
2015-08-30
18:18:49, Sun
OUTBOX
Not related, but this is also outrageous. 1 mean, come on. The woman
needed all this outside employment? \n\nAn article to share: How
Huma Abedin operated at the center of the Clinton univer$e\nHow
Huma Abedin operated at the center of the Clinton
universe\nhttp://wapo.st/lJAcrfVk ..
2015-08-30
19:32:25, Sun
INBOX
And blah, sitting on hold with 1500 trying to get my 324 email pin
reset...
2015-08-30
22:07:09, Sun
OUTBOX
Never mind. All my emails failed.
18
DOJ-PROD-OOOOOO6
Strzok-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2015-08-30
22:09:16, Sun
INBOX
Send to gtwn? 1 think my unet password expired. At least it hasn't
been working all day...
2015-08-30
22:09:59, Sun
OUTBOX
Nope, can't send from my Samsung, pics are on here.
2015-08-30
22:11:17, Sun
iNBOX
You might be able to text them. Mms is back to being enabled.
2015-08-30
22:11:40, Sun
INBOX
If they're in Knox 1 believe you can downdraft them but not sure
2015-08-30
22:23:07, Sun
Nope, you can't. Just tried, \n\nls your email working,
2015-08-30
22:23:34, Sun
OUTBOX
Oh well that's annoying. 1 specifically took them in Knox so 1 could
email them.
2015-08-30
22:23:45, Sun
OUTBOX
Yeah, just think I'm over my limit.
2015-08-30
22:58:10, Sun
OUTBOX
Resent them in smaller sizes. 1 think it worked. You'll have to let me
know tomorrow.
2015-08-31
11:44:15, Mon
INBOX
Heading into sioc. Hope you get some rest. I'll check in later.
2015-08-31
OUTBOX
11:48:05, Mon
And please call today.
2015-08-31
12:27:49, Mon
OUTBOX
^d hi. Stupid 8:30 mtg.
1 want to talk with vou. \U0001f636
2015-09-01
00:36:38, Tue
OUTBOX
It's fine. Getting up early to walk with anyway.
2015-09-01
11:21:32, Tue
OUTBOX
Went walking with , Told her 1 asked you about in
case it ever comes up. (Just talking about people getting work done).
2015-09-01
11:24:40, Tue
INBOX
How on earth did you associate with the idea of getting work
done?
2015-09-01
11:29:21, Tue
UNBOX
And yuck, heading into Jeh. DO NOT like my new schedule...:(
2015-09-01
INBOX
15:19:15, Tue
2015-09-01
21:04:07, Tue
INBOX
Just got done with a non stop meeting since returning. 1 find I'm very
tired...
2015-09-01
OUTBOX
That's a lot of meetings. \U0001f61d I'm sorry.
21:41:23, Tue
2015-09-02
00:13:49, Wed
INBOX
If I'm permanently back at hq. I’m sure I'll be willing to drive you..
2015-09-02
21:07:44, Wed
INBOX
So 1 do want to know the answer to what you expect from lunch
tomorrow.
2015-09-02
| OUTBOX
Don't know. This was scheduled before the disastrous convo with he
21:09:47, Wed
*
and Trisha two weeks ago, but yes presumably a follow-up talk. He
thinks we've got tons of time but it’s only four more weeks.
19
DOJ-PROD-0000007
Strzok-Page Texts
Date UTC
2015-09-02
21:21:38, Wed
Type of Message
Body
INBOX
A)l'm glad you're doing it, keep the pressure on. 1 think his spec ass is
the best option. Actually, special is the BEST option, he's ft2 .
;)\n B)
2015-09-02
21:24:49, Wed
OUTBOX
A} yeah, pretty demoralized by the whole thing.
2015-09-02
21:25:46, Wed
OUTBOX
Not sure if Trisha will be there or not. Kind of hoping not, 1 can be
more frank if she’s not.
2015-09-02
21:26:13, Wed
2015-09-02
21:26:21, Wed
OUTBOX
1 might possibly maybe doubtful work for you someday, but definitely
NOT as your special assistant.
INBOX
Don’t think she would be, right?
2015-09-02
21:27:20, Wed
OUTBOX
Well 1 sort of invited it last time only be 1 want this resolved and it's
clear Jim won't decide without her. Understandably, but still.
2015-09-02
21:28:04, Wed
OUTBOX
She’s not formally on the invite so she or Jim would have to
remember.
2015-09-02
21:29:12, Wed
INBOX
Then she won't be there...
2015-09-02
21:29:25, Wed
OUTBOX
Yeah okay we’ll see.
2015-09-02
21:30:12, Wed
INBOX
Don't you brush me off! I'm wildly good at being a persistent pain in
the ass too!;)
2015-09-02
21:31:24, Wed
OUTBOX
Yes but 1 don't need you to be on this!
2015-09-02
21:31:25, Wed
OUTBOX
2015-09-02
21:31:25, Wed
OUTBOX
2015-09-02
21:32:27, Wed
OUTBOX
2015-09-02
21:32:58, Wed
INBOX
2015-09-02
21:33:17, Wed
INBOX
2015-09-02
21:34:45, Wed
OUTBOX
2015-09-02
21:39:12, Wed
INBOX
2015-09-02
21:42:29, Wed
INBOX
^■
2015-09-02
21:54:27, Wed
OUTBOX
L_
2015-09-02
21:59:37, Wed
INBOX
20
DOJ-PROD-OOOOOO8
Strzok-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2015-09-02
21:59:52, Wed
OUTBOX
1 am so proud of you. \u2764
2015-09-02
22:02:30, Wed
INBOX
But thanks \U0001f636
2015-09-03
INBOX
11:45:26, Thu
Heading in to sioc,
ttyl.
2015-09-03
13:55:56, Thu
INBOX
Np. I've got meeting at State IG at 11, going over with around
10:30. Should be back around 12:30, I'll hit you up then (1 know you'll
still be at lunch) but we can coordinate then.
INBOX
Hey 1 know you're at lunch. I'm back at hq, grabbing &pizza
2015-09-03
17:43:10, Thu
INBOX
This is a serious meeting fatigue zone
INBOX
Heading into a 2 conference call...
2015-09-03
17:44:17, Thu
OUTBOX
Oof. 1 know it is. :(
2015-09-03
19:24:41, Thu
INBOX
Hi there. Have 1 mentioned ces can be frustrating?
2015-09-03
19:25:03, Thu
INBOX
lOn a positive note, wrap was cancelled
2015-09-03
19:25:11, Thu
OUTBOX
!Wow, that's shocking to hear.\U0001f612
2015-09-03
19:25:32, Thu
OUTBOX
Yes, 1 stand by my initial contention that they suck.
2015-09-03
22:13:01, Thu
INBOX
Remind me to tell you the story about the 302s.
Aggravating.
2015-09-03
22:13:41, Thu
OUTBOX
More?
2015-09-03
22:52:48, Thu
INBOX
i
Hi there. Omg completely forgot it was Andys farewell tonight, just
went by there. Me' talked about her campaign.
2015-09-03
22:53:26, Thu
OUTBOX
She's lovely, no?
2015-09-03
22:54:01, Thu
INBOX
Of course. \U0001f636\n\nYes, she is.
2015-09-04
11:39:31, Fri
INBOX
1 have my 830, then a briefing immediately
afterwards at 930. Should be out by 1015 or 1030, I'll text you when 1
am....
2015-09-09
INBOX
And unrelated, did you see the pics of the guy who accompanied the
11:01:22, Wed
KY county clerk who wouldn't issue gay marriage licenses when she
was released from jail? Total caraciture of what you'd expect.
21
DOJ-PROD-0000009
Strzok-Page Texts
Date UTC
2015-09-10
11:36:1 5, Thu,
2015-09-10
11:38:49, Thu
2015-09-10
12:19:02, Thu
2015-09-10
12:21:21, Thu
2015-09-10
13:34:15, Thu
'Type of Message
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
I INBOX
Her column was pretty funny today .\n\nA Presidential Primary Cheat
Sheet http://nyti.ms/lQpSJCE _
Where are you meeting Aaron? Wilmer is close to Foggy Bottom, no?
And yuck, almost at hq...
Heading in, I'll text you when I'm done with my morning.session...
Hi there. Headed over to wf to yell at some people to stop sniveling.
U0001f621
2015-09-10
14:25:15, Thu
OUTBOX
How fun for you. Who's complaining?
2015-09-10
15:07:11, Thu
INBOX
K. Aaron just had to cancel lunch, so I'm flexible
2015-09-10
15:08:06, Thu
OUTBOX
Bummer. That stinks. Sorry. But yeah that we'II be able to talk.
2015-09-10
19:42:48, Thu
INBOX
Convo with Randy to tell you about...
2015-09-10
19:55:16, Thu
OUTBOX
Imsg, maybe in 10?
2015-09-11
00:31:06, Fri
INBOX
Remind me about Jeh roof, am and jg
2015-09-11
00:42:44, Fri
INBOX
And arghh. Really having a tough time with the decision we discussed
earlier. Really wish we could sit and talk. \U0001f636\n\n
2015-09-11
00:56:41, Fri
INBOX
If 1 had to pick now. I'd say no thanks. Let me continue the current
project 1 have and put in for 3 or 4 when they come open.
Why do 1 want to be in a hurry to go anywhere for
?
2015-09-11
01:45:54, Fri
OUTBOX
Didn't realize it would mean moving off current project - thought they
would just tdv vou over. We'll talk.
2015-09-11
10:12:43, Fri
INBOX
1 think 1 could probably negotiate with Randy to stay on the team for a
while, at least until it finally transitions to wfo. 1 think that’ll happen
before Xmas, though. So really want to talk...
2015-09-11
12:23:28, Fri
INBOX
Headed into sioc...hopefully a quiet morning here. Ttyl.
2015-09-11
23:31:51, Fri
INBOX
Fwiw, Moffa thinks 1 should take it.
2015-09-11
OUTBOX
You should. We can't both
23:32:59, Fri
be wrong.;)
2015-09-11
23:35:54, Fri
INBOX
You the two smartest people 1 know in the fbi;)
22
DOJ-PROD-OOOOOI0
Str7ok-Papfl Tnxt';
Date UTC
Type of Message
2015-09-12
09:19:44, Sat
OUTBOX
2015-09-12
10:57:28, Sat
INBOX
2015-09-12
10:59:31, Sat
INBOX
2015-09-12
22:23:29, Sat
INBOX
2015-09-13
14:02:06, Sun
OUTBOX
j
2015-09-13
14:05:51, Sun
OUTBOX
2015-09-13
14:11:21, Sun
INBOX
2015-09-14
23:19:19, Mon
2015-09-14
23 :19:22, Mon
2015-09-14
23:19:47, Mon
2015-09-14
23:20:26, Mon
2015-09-15
22:03:40, Tue
2015-09-15
22:07:4 5, Tue
2015-09-15
22:08:38, Tue
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
You have any idea this was coming?\n\nJustice Dept. Says Hillary
Clinton Had Authority to Delete Certain Emails
http://nyti.ms/lMhHPA3\n\n
No idea about doj statement. We're trying to
get a copy of original filing. We think it says she was requires to
preserve copies of things that were records and could delete the rest
but that the filing is being taken out of context and spun. But who
What isn't clear from the article is whether or not they (doj) speak to
the issue of whether or not she had authority to be operating off of a
private server.
B) is very nice but she's no Lisa Page. JG wanted something on
Fri, So i sent an email this morning at 830 to her and oroposing
how to handle it—crickets... __
So I think I've decided that I'm not going to start until Thursday my
first week back, then the following week has a fed holiday so it's only
a 4 day week,
so I
might take that Monday off as well, just so I can ease back in.
Especially if it's still not clear what I'll be doing. \U0001f612
Or in the alternative, maybe I'll start on Wednesday but just work half
days thru thatfriday. __
Or, log into eras and do your mandatory training and milk another
week. \n\nBefore you start working with |...;)_
! Talked to Gregg about Randy's offer. His advice is take what I'll enjoy,
as I have options...plus a ton of more detail about upcoming
personnel moves.... _
Be, not me.
Yep. Seems like I want my cake and eat it, too...
So that's a no cpc move? I still say start your ses clock, although
there's no doubt you will have options. _
Np. Briefing to D we thought was on the 28th is now tomorrow at
2....glad we 're s o prep ared...we will be, but still _
Yikes, but you'll be completely great...
Honestly, l thought it was weird that he would let you brief clapper
before he got a recent update...
23
DOJ-PROD-OOOOO11
Strzok-Page Texts
Date UTC
2015-09-15
22:19:33, Tue
[Type of Message
INBOX
2015-09-15 INBOX
22:34:13, Tue
2015-09-15 INBOX
23:25:10, Tue
OUTBOX
2015-09-16 OUTBOX
12:22:46, Wed
2015-09-16 OUTBOX
13:05:08, Wed
I think he more wants insight now that Cornyn has called for a special
prosector...anyway, should be able to imsg from 7-8 or so.
Yeah, it is, but I'll try.:(
No worries. I feel badly even mentioning because I don't want you to
change a thing. Only letting you know in case you ordinarily would
find vourself free...\U0001f636
Yep. Until work Conf call at 815
I hit you there.
You still have your 830?
Called Jim baker 30 minutes ago. Still haven't heard anything from
him.
2015-09-16 OUTBOX
14:39:00, Wed
2015-09-16 INBOX
15:21:58, Wed
OUTBOX
2015-09-16 INBOX
15:22:59, Wed
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
i OUTBOX
I
OUTBOX
outbojT
INBOX
2015-09-21
11:16:42 , Mon
2015-09-21
11:38:51, Mon
2015-09-21
13:29:14, Mon
2015-09-21
13:29:41, Mon
2015-09-21
13:59:30, Mon
And even more \U0001f621, just went to log into eras and discovered
some certificate was expired. So now I need to bring it in today.
\U0001f621\U0001f621\U0001f621
Although I know you're p*ssed about the eras stuff. Sorry about that.
:(
Super annoying, yes.
Jims heading up to Harvard now. So he can't talk to you. Or the
Director at 2:00. \U0001f612 I
I know. I'm being awfully weak and needy. \n'
I can't get my eras to play sound. Going to be a real impediment to
getti ng m y trainin gs done. \U0 001f 621 __
You don't need the sound. Will take you longer to read, anyway.
;)\n\nLet me know when I can imsg something
Emailed eras lady, got sound working.
Procurement training is fascinating! And so relevant!
Was looking at the directors award winners. What was
?\n\nAnd did you notice that there is an agent with the last name
of' 'I found that somewhat spectacular. \U0001f60a
| Will till you at lunch. And you're showing as "away' 1 - are you pulling a
trick?
2015-09-21
INBOX
And 1 did not know that re SA
14:03:06, Mon
24
DOJ-PROD-0000012
Strzok-Page Texts
Body
INBOX
Np. Hit me on email, heading back into sioc. Got you a headset for
eras
2015-09-21
14:08:14, Mon
OUTBOX
Don't think 1 need it now, ! got sound working. But thanks.
2015-09-21
20:33:14, Mon
INBOX
Waiting on Randy to see if there's wrap - he's ead today and has a
4:45 upstairs.
2015-09-21
23:56:26, Mon
INBOX
Just got done sending an email to Randy and everyone...God what 1
would do to have you on the team. \n\nOf course that might just
scuttle our Dlans for reform entirely....
2015-09-22
00:03:35, Tue
INBOX
Your point? \n\n;) ...(I win)\n\nMy God 1 so
much prefer being busy and engaged. And that's why 1 don't think 1
can ultimately take the job, better to wait for the one that will be that
way.
OUTBOX
You wouldn't be busy there?\n\nfm glad you're alpy.
2015-09-24
11:33:24, Thu
INBOX
Downtown traffic also super light. Email me if you want a ride as I'm
heading into sioc now...
2015-09-24
12:14:48, Thu
INBOX
Hi there. Just shot the sh*t with Randy for 30 minutes. Going to get
Peets.. it's dead quiet here...
2015-09-24
12:37:08, Thu
OUTBOX
How was your convo with randy? Can
you talk?
2015-09-24
12:42:15, Thu
INBOX
Yes! 1 can also give you a ride if you want...
2015-09-24 INBOX
20:04:12, Thu
Have to head into sioc for Conf call, will be an hour. I’ll hit you here
when done.
2015-09-24 OUTBOX
20:08:44, Thu ■
Whoa! Now 1 want to talk! Gordon? Johnson? For sac?
(2015-09-24
21:36:24, Thu
INBOX
Hi. I’m done. Can you talk?
2015-09-25
INBOX
Hi ;)\n\nl hate DoJ..
23:25:03, Fri
2015-09-25
INBOX
23:59:16, Fri
\nd 1 hate DoJ. Literally they have pulled
me away from half of dinner. \U0001f620\n\nAnd hi
2015-09-26
00:10:56, Sat
OUTBOX
What's their issue now?
2015-09-26
OUTBOX
No email, btw. At least for once it wasn't the stupid phone's fault.
00:23:32, Sat
2015-09-26
INBOX
I'm betting 1 have an unsent email sitting on my unet desktop. Sorry
01:02:30, Sat
about that. 50 things came crashing in at once at the end of the day.
25
DOJ-PROD-OOOOOI3
Strzok-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
2015-09-26
01:03:50, Sat
INBOX
2015-09-26
01:04:39, Sat
INBOX
2015-09-26
04:16:26, Sat
OUTBOX
2015-09-26
OUTBOX
08:31:14, Sat
Body _ _
DoJ wants to I get they want to scope as
narrowly as possible but they're creating a ton of extra work for
everyone. nAnyway, now I have to go in
tomorrow so th ey can look thru e mails. _
.1 know, me too. it completely sucks.\n\nWho is coming in to read
emails? That also totally sucks.
What a joke: \nStill, there was progress. Never before had China
agreed with Mr. Obama\u2019s fundamental premise that the theft
of intellectual property for commercial gain was off limits. After weeks
of behind-the-scenes negotiations with the Chinese leadership, first in
Beijing in late August and then with a delegation of nearly 50 senior
Chinese officials who came to Washington quietly two weeks ago,
Beijing agreed to wording that read: \u201cNeither country\u2019s
government will conduct or knowingly support cyber-enabled theft of
intellectual property, including trade secrets or other confidential
business information, with the intent of providing competitive
advantages to companies or commercial sectors.\u201d\n\nLimiting
Security Breaches May Be Impossible Task for U.$. and China
http://nyti.ms/lLchlQD
2015-09-26
08:38:23, Sat
2015-09-26
08:57:41, Sat
2015-09-26
11:35:45, Sat
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
2015-09-26 INBOX
11:36:57, Sat
Zuckerberg, Cook, Natella all seated at the the head table with potus.
No surprise we lost. \U0001f621\n\nState Dinner forXi Jinping Has
Hig h-Tech Flavor http://nyti.ms/liR8KXb _
And God, that's an awful sequence of time stamps on your texts.:(
I'm sorry.. ans are coming in. Not sure that they need to
read them, but we're asking them to jump through their ass to act
quickly, so not in much of a position to argue if they want to come in.
And now have to prep Randy for Laufman because even though
Randy called him after he
couldn't reach Toscas. So now Laufman is calling him all the time.
\U0001f621
26
DOJ-PROD-0000014
Strzok-Page Texts
2015-09-27 INBOX We work 60-70 hours, easily, when we're cranking. I'm
01:17:59, Sun reviewing DoJ draft to W&c now...\n\r
2015-09-27 OUTBOX Yeah, but when I worked 8 to 7 with andy, I almost never worked on j
01:24:22, Sun weekends. But yes, I get it.\n\r
2015-09-27 INBOX
13:41:24, Sun j
I'
and reading work product (how do you do
■what we do without a law degree or at least deep knowledge of
same?).\n\m
2015-09-27
INBOX
\n\nNp. We can play it by
23:43:49, Sun
ear,
\n\nPutin is verv good. We're kind of suckers....
2015-09-27
23:47:45, Sun
OUTBOX
He totally is. Makes some sense too given his training.
2015-09-27
23:50:34, Sun
INBOX
Yeah, but also a little crazy. He already threw out the "if 1 may use a
term of intelligence professionals, these are active measures" (re
alleged disinformation about Russia)\n\nl think the fundamental
Russian character wants an oppressive showy slightly crazy strong
man...
2015-09-28
OUTBOX
100% right. And plays to it excellently.’
00:40:34, Mon
2015-09-28
OUTBOX
I'm doing infosec training while we
01:50:35, Mon
wait to go back out. \U0001f612
2015-09-28
10:58:45, Mon
OUTBOX
Sigh. And 1 just "failed" my veterans employment training. God they
are so profoundly useless.
2015-09-28
10:59:27, Mon
INBOX
Yay. More time on eras....yes, it's awful
2015-09-28
OUTBOX
1 put in 11 hours total last week, so that should help.
11:01:39, Mon
2015-09-28 INBOX That's great. God. I am SO behind this morning...
11:06:26, Mon_
27
DOJ-PROD-0000015
Strzok-Page Texts
Date UT C Ty pe of Message
2015-09-28 INBOX
12:17:32. Mon _
2015-09-28 OUTBOX
12:25:26, Mon
2015-09-29
10:11:53, Tue
INBOX
2015-09-29 OUTBOX
10:47:31, Tue
2015-09-29 OUTBOX
10:50:01, Tue
2015-09-29 j INBOX
10:52:45, Tue
2015-09-29
10:53:31, Tue
2015-09-29
10:55:04, Tue
UNBOX
OUTBOX
Hey heading into hq. Hit me on imsg later. I'll try to get a pass and
figure out wh ere to meet. __
1 Will do. I called and left yet another message for Jim baker. I think I'm
just going to have to tell tomorrow -1 think we are planning on
walking, no doubt she is going to ask when I returning and what in
going to be doing. I am quite frustrated. \U0001f612
unny feeling to have a PT test. It was such a regular
part of the Army, it brings back memories, mostly not positive. Oh
well. __
; You're going to be fine.
Walked and talked with HWerrtokayl
Will have
to talk to you about it later, but if I had to bet, I'd guess I'm going back
to nslb. Apparently Trisha has spoken to her and about it, is
clearly where she is leaning too.
Well, it's good
in this instance. Of course I want
to talk about it, not even sure if I can make it to lunch I
>
Hopefully she has some ideas about what happens if you leave in 4
months....or less....
Yeah, I guess
2015-09-29
10:55:41, Tue
2015-09-29
10:56:57, Tue
2015-09-29
10:57:03, Tue
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
2015-09-29 INBOX
10:58:39, Tue _
2015-09-29 [OUTBOX
11:00:28, Tue
But still, it's not the first time.
! If 1 leave soon I think she just readjusts clients again. Whatever.
What time does your fit test start? And seriously, don't be nervous.
You'v e tot ally got this. _
WeiTBBnotgoing to. \U0001f612\n\nAsfor that
way, right? And maybe the convo was recent, after or around your
last t alk with Jim _
8
iShe is. Convo with Trisha definitely happened after the
28
DOJ-PROD-OOOOOI6
Strzok-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2015-09-29
OUTBOX
i Also, told her 1 was in the ofc briefly yesterday but didn't mention that
11:01:10, Tue
1 saw you, so don't say anything.
2015-09-29
11:05:27, Tue
INBOX
1 Didn't others on longer tdys keep their offices?
2015-09-29
11:07:03, Tue
OUTBOX
Yup.
2015-09-29
11:08:06, Tue
INBOX
It really is. Can imsg if you prefer
2015-09-29
11:09:48, Tue
INBOX
K. I'll hit you when test is done. Sorry about bullshit
2015-09-29
14:50:01, Tue
INBOX
Hey I'm going to head in to sioc to check in. Will come out around
11:30 assuming nothings on fire. You can always email, too...ttyl
2015-09-30
13:32:44, Wed
INBOX
[_
1 should be free around 11:30 then have at 1:45
conference call...
2015-09-30
22:27:17, Wed
INBOX
Aaaaand it turns out I'm not done. Stupid DoJ. Going to talk to
2015-09-30
OUTBOX
23:00:29, Wed
A/hat did doj
want?
2015-09-30
23:05:43, Wed
INBOX
Essentially, something to provide them the ability to not have to take
a hard stand and say no to something defense counsel wants us to do.
2015-09-30
23:06:13, Wed
OUTBOX
They're awful. I'm sorry.
2015-09-30
23:33:20, Wed
OUTBOX
Yeah, when you deny the massacre of a million people over a hundred
years after it happened as a matter of state policy and by every
average citizen it's just sort of offensive.
2015-10-01
11:43:43, Thu
OUTBOX
Hey what’s our zip at hq, 20535?
2015-10-01
11:43:45, Thu
INBOX
That's true, \n\nl DON'T want to go to work today, 1 don’t want to
fight at DOJ, & 1 don't want to fight the screaming
people at headquarters who don't understand the subtleties of
everything we have to do...
2015-10-01
11:43:45, Thu
INBOX
Yes. 20535.
2015-10-01
21:42:24, Thu
INBOX
Hi. To ces for proliferation portfolio
2015-10-01
22:34:31, Thu
INBOX
And holy sh*t destroyed ces and nsd at a meeting this
afternoon. Remind me to tell you.\n\nAnd hi.
2015-10-01
22:40:09, Thu
OUTBOX
Ooh. 1 can't believe you didn't tell me! Can you still talk?
29
DOJ-PROD-OOOOOI7
Strzok-Paee Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
2015-10-02
00:12:51, Fri
INBOX
2015-10-02
00:15:26, Fri
OUTBOX
2015-10-02
00:18:52, Fri
INBOX
INBOX
2015-10-02
00:19:38, Fri
OUTBOX
Body
Been on the phone with so
just as well. Going to start cooking in earnest now.
Everything
cool re ' _
Yes\n\nAnd yeah, he just wanted to vent about main justice being
dicks
Political dicks
Got it. \n\nCan imsg now, but it's okay if you can't.
2015-10-04
22:32:40, Sun
OUTBOX
Hey also heads up if you've emailed me today, 1 haven't been able to
get it. I'm guessing my unet password has expired.
2015-10-04
22:52:06, Sun
INBOX
It's going to be ok at work. And haven't emailed you here, although i
just did on gmail
2015-10-05
OUTBOX
My unet not working.
14:17:52, Mon
2015-10-05
18:09:02, Mon
INBOX
K, then I'm going to walk into sioc quickly
2015-10-05
18:16:34, Mon
OUTBOX
Leaving now. Also, play dumb with he's going to schedule lunch
for tomorrow.
2015-10-05
18:53:26, Mon
INBOX
You clearly haven't read the email repartee yet. You update your
password on Samsung?
2015-10-05
18:54:10, Mon
OUTBOX
1 did. 1 don't give a hoot about the email repartee.
2015-10-05
22:29:50, Mon
INBOX
No, just long. JG wants to go to mtg at State tomorrow...certainly
changes dynamic. \n\n
2015-10-05
22:35:00, Mon
OUTBOX
Who was going to be ranking? Randy? Jg certainly tougher, may be a
good thing.\n\nK.\n\n
2015-10-05
INBOX
Yep. He's doing whatever here with dd. 1 guess, but hope we're not
22:38:11, Mon
over playing our hand.
30
DOJ-PROD-OOOOOI 8
Strzok-Page Texts
Date UTC
2015-10-05
23:03:53, Mon
2015-10-05
23:06:58, Mon
Type of Mess age
OUTBOX
INBOX
; Whatever here with DD? Not sure what that means.
i probably try to leave around 2 again if I can...
■■
I have to be back early to get to State by 2. Let's leave early (does
have something keeping him from departing until noon)
2015-10-06 INBOX
00:50:53, Tue
2015-10-06 INBOX
15:30:11, Tue_
2015-10-06 INBOX
17:50:51, Tue
INBOX
2015-10-06
20:11:15, Tue
2015-10-06
20:26:01, Tue
2015-10-06
21:55:39, Tue
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
2015-10-07 INBOX
1 5:42:46, Wed _
2015-10-08 INBOX
15:28:11, Thu
2015-10-09 OUTBOX
12:11:12, Fri ‘
2015-10-09
12:21:02, Fri
INBOX
2015-10-10
22:25:46, Sat
I INBOX
2015-10-12 INBOX
22:29:11, Mon
Btw, went down rundown of who's going where with She asked
if I had any leads on who replaces I said I didn't. \n\nSigh. No
idea where I feel like I should go on this. It's not an obvious, oh, Pete
should go for that job. _
Hey doesn't know I saw you earlier, right?
Sitting waiting at State...
Booooooooo. I do not like your absence as a result of your so-called
"work." __ _
Sorry for the insane amount of absence. 1 spoke to jim,
trisha, so at least that is all handled. _
Talked one substantive issue with trisha too, so that's good. At least I
: hope.
Hey heading into sioc, if you can talk, email me and I'll step out
Headed back into sioc. Hit me on email or lync
2015-10-10 OUTBOX
[Article on
22:22:18, Sat
Am also quite bummed about missing be I was hoping to get a
sense of what I'll be doing/whether I can start moving boxes over
(ag ain). God, moving sucks. _
Heading into sioc. Insg whenever, think about where we can link up. I
have an 11-12 then lunch with 12-1
in the times. Just sent
i Yep just read it. Good thing they draw parallels of cases WHERE
CHARGES ARE DROPPED as being the same as an uncharged
individual. \U0001f621 ___
Again, I think work will actually help. Who are you checking in with?
You get to set up your office.
31
DOJ-PROD-OOOOOI9
Date UTC
2015-10-12
22:29:32, Mon
2015-10-12
22:33:13, Mon
Type ot IV
INBOX
OUTBOX
2015-10-12
22:37:24, Mon
2015-10-12
22:38:27, Mon
2015-10-12
22:40:39, Mon
2015-10-12
22:42:43, Mon
2015-10-13
19:30:13, Tue
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
2015-10-13
19:33:40, Tue
2015-10-13
19:34:24, Tue
2015-10-13
19:34:51, Tue
2015-10-13
19:35:31, Tue
INBOX
And I'll get to return all the stuff I've been holding for safe
keepin g...m ore :)...._ _
, whoever I see first. So probably \n\nMaybe.
Depends on what my lock options are. I'm going to resist getting locks
changed on my safe, etc. until I gave some sense of duration. You do
still need to slip yourself some cash though.
I'll definitely take my pen though. \U0001f636\U0001f636\U0001f636
We’ll see. You need to go exchange before it's too late. Though I can
obviously live quite happily with what’s there now. \U0001f60a
Yes, still need to muster the courage...\U0001f612
Sigh. I suppose you can keep them at work indefinitely...
|lhey're home, just need to reveal them finally. \n\n
Will hit you back here
Ha! You better not!!!\n\nStiII waiting on Randy. \U0001f615
32
DOJ-PROD-0000020
Strzok-Pafie Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Bodv
2015-10-14
01:06:37, Wed
OUTBOX
Giacalone wasn't in again today -1 REALLY
need to talk to him about getting a temp pass.
2015-10-14
01:09:09, Wed
INBOX JG said he's out this week. Let me see what 1 can do
2015-10-14
01:11:52, Wed
INBOX
And Martin OMalley's a douche
2015-10-14
01:13:59, Wed
OUTBOX
Out the whole week?! Wtf?\n\nDon't worry about it If you can
get one for just tomorrow, great. But no big deal if not.
2015-10-14
01:14:26, Wed
OUTBOX
I'm not watching. 1 can't tell you how little I care right now.
2015-10-14
01:16:09, Wed
INBOX
Yeah not sure what he's doing. But just saw a six month Mission Need
pass for a CD4 UC.
2015-10-14
01:17:12, Wed
INBOX
Kind of a foregone conclusion but so much more substantive than the
Rep debates
2015-10-14
OUTBOX
Which one? \n\nThat's nice to hear at least. \n\n
01:18:00, Wed
2015-10-14
01:21:15, Wed
INBOX
Which one what?
2015-10-14
01:21:15, Wed
INBOX
JG. Don't know what's going on this week
2015-10-14
01:21:27, Wed
OUTBOX
Which uc?
2015-10-14
01:25:50, Wed
OUTBOX
Oh wait, 1 do. Going to Canada 1 think. Maybe randy joining? That ring
a bell?
2015-10-14
01:26:13, Wed
INBOX
4C. Not at all a mission need. Good initiative but not mission need.
\n\nDon't think Randy is going. Is it wrong of me to think this
is largely a waste of time?
2015-10-14
01:27:57, Wed
OUTBOX
It totally is. Andy NEVER traveled in that gig unless he had to. But
whatever.
2015-10-14
02:22:05, Wed
INBOX
Ooh hillary Bernie throw down on 215
INBOX
Gregg got cirg AD
2015-10-15
12:20:17, Thu
OUTBOX
Good for him.
2015-10-15
12:59:06, Thu
INBOX
Also remind me Baker WH story
2015-10-15
OUTBOX
15:39:44, Thu
Be SOC is at Columbia Law School at some GDark symposium.
\U0001f612
33
DOJ-PROD-0000021
Strzok-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2015-10-15
16:47:40, Thu
OUTBOX
Still in the Onp.
2015-10-15
16:49:22, Thu
INBOX
Oh. Misread your lunch email. Why is SOC at Columbia and not
or an attorney like Dr ANYONE who can speak
substantivelv to the matter?
2015-10-16
00:43:54, Fri
INBOX
And re your last imsg, where does everyone think is going?
Clearly I’d love 4 but it needs to be open
2015-10-16
00:49:16, Fri
OUTBOX
Okay.\n\nNo clue.
2015-10-16
00:52:37, Fri
INBOX
And I’m sorry, and 1 just don't get along? No. He insists on
different investigative paths and encourages another field office to
reopen a case (of , we closed. Promptly leading to
discussion in 01 about whether the new office made material
misrepresentations in their FISA application, leading to the case to be
closed.
2015-10-16
INBOX
00:53:23, Fri
2015-10-16
00:54:01, Fri
INBOX
He is unprofessional, he actively bears a grudge and looks to find ways
to highlight that when he can, and generally vastly wildly over steps
his role
2015-10-16
00:54:57, Fri
INBOX
He precipitates a formal meeting from Toscas to in which has
to calm down DOJ. •
2015-10-16
00:55:08, Fri
INBOX
So yeah, 1 guess we just don't get along
2015-10-16
00:55:17, Fri
OUTBOX
she just wasn't going to get into it. But you're right about all of
it, 1 know.
2015-10-16
00:56:19, Fri
OUTBOX
We also talked about what a blowhard douchy is and how she
likes a lot of the agents and SSAs at wfo but that they seem to be
going off the rails with vou gone.
2015-10-16
00:56:30, Fri
OUTBOX
I'm fine.
2015-10-16
00:57:02, Fri
OUTBOX
Yeah, he hates with an unbridled passion.
2015-10-16
01:01:34, Fri
INBOX
Sorry to vent. My point is short of douchyness you
shouldn't hate so hard
2015-10-16
01:02:05, Fri
OUTBOX
Vent all you want. Doesn't bother me.
2015-10-16
01:05:20, Fri
OUTBOX
So. Guess I’m going to go now, unless you think you're going to free
up or have more you want to say.
2015-10-16
01:10:05, Fri
INBOX
Just freed up. How come you didn't mention all this earlier?!?
34
DOJ-PROD-0000022
Strzok-Pace Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2015-10-16
01:10:26, Fri
OUTBOX
What a douche. And love that he got a secutity clearance - very
rigourous review of his background obviously.\n\nAn article to share:
He claimed to be ex-CIA and was quoted as an expert on Fox News.
Prosecutors say it was a lie.\nHe claimed to be ex-CIA and was quoted
as an expert on Fox News. Prosecutors say it was a
lie.\nhttp://wapo.st/10FfROb
2015-10-16
01:10:55, Fri
OUTBOX
Forgot.
2015-10-16
01:12:37, Fri
INBOX
I'm really worried about wf. Yes, there have been a couple of issues
since 1 left. Some of this is jackals haters hating (Hi \n\nBut it
pains me because you want to be replaceable. Everybody thinks being
irreplaceable is great. The opposite is true. You want to get everyone
good enough that it doesn't matter if you're there
2015-10-16
10:05:32, Fri
INBOX
Spinning in my head, of course. Probably just going to go in. 1 have to
get Gregg bullets for my PAR plus write 8 others.
2015-10-17
00:15:43, Sat
OUTBOX
Was thinking about it more, 1 think you could totally start the poem
tomorrow by saying "Reading poetry, out loud, before a room full of
people isn't exactly what FBI agents excel at, so we ask your
forgiveness for any stumbles along the way" or something like that.
2015-10-17
00:17:52, Sat
OUTBOX
And just realized, never came. Not sure what happened. As 1
was leaving he said he'd see me there.,.
2015-10-17
00:18:35, Sat
INBOX
Yeah, nor Andy or the DD.
2015-10-17
00:19:07, Sat
OUTBOX
Andy is down in southern VA. Ironman is tomorrow.
2015-10-17
00:19:10, Sat
2015-10-17
00:19:50, Sat
INBOX
1 don't know if 1 want to say that...too cute/familiar? Especially in
front of ig, Randy
OUTBOX
Think it would be fine, but either way.
2015-10-17
00:21:35, Sat
INBOX
Oh. Thought it was local. better drag his sorry ass down
tomorrow. \n\nAnd if this keeps up we might as well imsg. \n\r
35
DOJ-PROD-0000023
Strzok-Page Texts
Date UTC
2015-10-18
19:08:16, Sun
Type of Message
INBOX
Bod y _
Easy when your ENTIRE country is the size of Oregon. And when your
colonial policies are largely to blame for the Israeli-Palesinian conflict,
the India -Pakistani conflict, pretty much every place your colonial
empire touched,\n\nAnd finally the why can't the US have an MI5,
they're soooo much better than us debate has died. Pretty much
every bss or sb guy I've ever talked to wished they could be us. \n\nl
have a real problem with Anglophiles and the whole perception of
bringing intellectual greatness to the world.\n\nAnyway. Hi. \u263a
2015-10-19
11:39:39, Mon
2015-10-19
11:42:17, Mon
2015-10-19
11:54:03, Mon
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
Can't talk, did you get my text? Of course et AL have had these
briefs for god knows how long, I'm going to need to scramble to
review them this am and figure out what we need to provide to doj.
Yes, was just checking in case you might have hit traffic.
\ U 0Q 01f636\n\nWhen'sthe dead I i n e to doj? Today? _
Of course the deadline is today. I said mid-morning.
\U0001f612\n\nYeah, it was damn cold out this morning. Totally need
your shirt, and thin gloves, and something for my ears...
2015-10-19
11:54:38, Mon
2015-10-19
11:55:59, Mon
2015-10-19
11:56:50, Mon
2015-10-19
11:57:04, Mon
2015-10-20
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
And just re -read
comments. Looks like mid morning.
Selfishly, the only good news in all of that is it may mean we can grab
lunch, assuming you don't have plans. And I certainly know the
comments do doesn't mean that they won't be calling long after that.
When is DoJ's deadline?
No clue. And yes, if 1 can work-wise, OF COURSE we're getting lunch.
'Okay, got to put this down and hustle now. Sorry.:(
I _
About my meeting tomorrow? Well whatever you did I didn't notice
lit.
2015-10-20
23:29:14, Tue
INBOX
I'm not. ^n\nNothing but
sweet re
2015-10-20
23:40:09, Tue
OUTBOX
So tell me!
2015-10-21
00:02:32, Wed
UNBOX
said all the stuff you were describing, she would be no good and
have no desire to do. 1 told her that what you said was that you were
largely the same. She said yeah, but seemed also to worry about it
some.
2015-10-21
20:14:34, Wed
INBOX
Hi. \n\nOMG THAT WAS HORRIBLE. AN UTTER WASTE OF TIME AND
TAXPAYER MONEY. \n\nWHAT IN THE HELL IS DOING? WHO IS
SUPERVISING THEM?\n\nThere. 1 feel better, thanks
36
DOJ-PROD-OOOOCI24
Strzok-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2015-10-21
INBOX
You still.get more done than 90%:of ogc'
22:50:25, Wed
2015-10-22
13:09:50, Thu
INBOX
That stinks. I'd love to meet you but 1 can't. Have to talk to
then 10 with then 1030 with ces then 11 with jg and toscas
2015-10-22
13:10:16, Thu
INBOX
Riding down elevator with and us atty, leans over and
whispers, "so 1 hear you may not be coming back."
2015-10-22
13:37:41, Thu
OUTBOX
Wow, talk about the word getting out. That’s great
2015-10-22
13:40:40, Thu
INBOX
Saddest conversation with So many topics of general interest
when we don't even need them!
2015-10-24
12:03:02, Sat
INBOX
Justice Department Wants Court To Force Apple To Decrypt iPhones
Because Apple Licenses, Not Sells, iOS : BIZ TECH : Tech
Times\nhttp://www.techtimes.com/artides/99132/20151024/justice-
department-wants-court-to-force-apple-to-decrypt-iphones-because-
appie-licenses-not-sells-ios.htm
2015-10-24
12:03:09, Sat
INBOX
" "Apple cannot reap the legal benefits of licensing its software in this
manner and then later disclaim any ownership or obligation to assist
law enforcement when that same software plays a critical role in
thwarting execution of a search warrant,"
2015-10-24
12:07:31, Sat
INBOX
To be clear, that's the govt's brief, not the article. Still, i like the
reasoning. Yay imsg
2015-10-24
12:08:19, Sat
OUTBOX
Totally understood. My impressed was simply that we were taking it
on. Clever reasoning too.
2015-10-26
23:31:54, Mon
INBOX
Sorry, was talking to |^^^|then WH. Just got done but need to call
Moffa and
2015-10-26
23:37:05, Mon
OUTBOX
Np. Hope everything is okay.
2015-10-26
23:43:19, Mon
INBOX
Yeah. DoJ are putzes, man.
2015-10-26
23:44:07, Mon
OUTBOX
Sounds awesome
2015-10-27
INBOX
Awesome not the word 1 would use. Just people needing to posture.
00:52:14, Tue
2015-10-27
OUTBOX
Yeah that was a joke.\n\nFine, but kind of odd.
00:53:30, Tue
2015-10-27
INBOX
Yeah i was kind of cranky, sorry i missed the humor. \n\nHmm. .
00:58:24, Tue
2015-10-27
OUTBOX
No problem. ^n\n
01:36:09, Tue
37
DOJ-PROD-0000025
Strzok-Page Texts
\
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2015-10-27
23:07:43, Tue
OUTBOX
2015-10-27
23:09:37, Tue
OUTBOX
2015-10-27
23:11:16, Tue
INBOX
2015-10-27
23:11:38, Tue
OUTBOX
2015-10-27
23:12:25, Tue
OUTBOX
2015-10-28
00:57:19, Wed
INBOX
Based on your prior representations to me that this group is entirely
women, 1 can only assume my inclusion on this group text was in the
context of cancelling the 8:30 so as to free to attend with you,
not at the prospect of me attending.
2015-10-28
00:57:34, Wed
INBOX
2015-10-28
00:58:40, Wed
INBOX
And yes, apparently is in OKC. 1 don't understand why she
doesn't send I spent 8 months near there at my officer basic
course and there is NOTHING to recommend it
2015-10-29
19:01:21, Thu
OUTBOX
Hi. Remind me conversation about you with andy. All good...
2015-10-30
OUTBOX
00:44:15, Fri
In this case, totally deficient NSL non-disclosure procedures.
\U0001f621
2015-10-30
INBOX
Yeah somehow I'm not surprised that they suck.
00:45:56, Fri
i
i
2015-10-30
00:50:57, Fri
OUTBOX
Reading this definitely sucks worse.
2015-10-30
00:51:46, Fri
INBOX
You have a sofrcopy? Will read it while 1 wait
2015-10-30
00:52:26, Fri
OUTBOX
1 wish. Just on red side. (Not class, just written there).
2015-10-30
00:58:52, Fri
OUTBOX
And god, these are so bareboned I'm not even sure where to start.
2015-10-30
01:43:12, Fri
INBOX
Hi. JG just called...
2015-10-30
OUTBOX
He did? That's good. ’
02:36:45, Fri
2015-10-30
INBOX
Got a tiny hint of some more info this
10:07:30, Fri
morning. Will tell you later.
2015-10-31
OUTBOX
20:20:32, Sat
39
DOJ-PROD-OOOOQ27
Strzok-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message Body
2015-10-31
INBOX
20:36:08, Sat
2015-10-31
OUTBOX
21:22:59, Sat
2015-11-01
OUTBOX
And 1 hope Paul Ryan fails and crashes in a blaze
23:21:36, Sun
of glory.
2015-11-01
23:23:04, Sun
INBOX
Yes. And, me too. At some point the Rep party needs to pull their
head out of their *ss. Shows no sign of occurring anytime soon.
2015-11-02
16:54:33, Mon
INBOX
Hi. Forgot 1 have lunch today with Iris and So that's nice.
2015-11-02
17:44:50, Mon
OUTBOX
2015-11-02
18:20:09, Mon
INBOX
2015-11-02
OUTBOX
18:23:57, Mon ;
2015-11-03
00:48:13, Toe
INBOX
\n\nHow
. .was lurch?____
No. Lazy entitlement. \n\nTold her she should go and we could tell
her about the meetings afterwards. And re ust that I hadn't
realized you and didn't like her either (a lie, obviously)\n\nAnd
sorry, I can't.
2015-11-03
13:13:37, Tue
1 OUTBOX ’
That's stinky. \U0001f621 Yes, 9:30, and lunch with Andrew. And need
to rewrite the nsl procedures TODAY. When do you think you'll be
back?
2015-11-03
14:13:25, Tue
OUTBOX
Lucky day - Andrew just canceled on me.:)
2015-11-04
11:17:02, Wed
OUTBOX
lost. What a f-ing disappointment.
2015-11-04
11:27:43, Wed
OUTBOX
52/47. I'm really so disappointed. What is wrong with people?
2015-11-04
11:48:51, Wed
INBOX
jiB) 1 saw. Disappointing, but look at the district
map. Loudon is being gentrified, but it's still largely ignorant hillbillys.
Good for her for running, but curious if she's energized or never again.
40
DOJ-PROD-0000028
Strzok-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2015-11-05
17:28:19, Thu
INBOX
Btw, just saw has a six month Mission Need pass... 1
2015-11-05
17:29:09, Thu
OUTBOX
Yeah, but she's an acting SC like so that's not so unreasonable...
Though 1 appreciate your attempt to find fault.:)
•
2015-11-06
12:49:15, Fri
OUTBOX
Hi there. 1 am both late and slow this morning. Seems unreasonable
to have to go to work today.
2015-11-06
17:29:16, Fri
INBOX
He have a 1 hard stop?
2015-11-06
17:30:39, Fri
OUTBOX
Nope were going now. No clue how long.
2015-11-06
18:34:11, Fri
OUTBOX
Walking back now
2015-11-06
18:42:58, Fri
INBOX
K. Need to meet the Aussies real fast then free till 3. Jones wants
closeout. \U0001f612
2015-11-06
18:43:29, Fri
OUTBOX
L, let me see of 1 can get my card fixed quickly. Going in to ofc now
2015-11-06
19:03:31, Fri
INBOX
Hi. Free...
2015-11-06
22:20:44, Fri
OUTBOX
Sorry got caught with Can call you from the car.
2015-11-07
16:56:35, Sat
OUTBOX
K. coming over in a second, but don't expect she'll stay very long.
Just fvi if 1 am delayed.
2015-11-07
17:11:25, Sat
INBOX
Hi !\n\nDont know if you're interested but going to
need help...not full time...
2015-11-07
17:43:55, Sat
OUTBOX
Hi there. I'm sorry. She stayed longer than 1 thought she would. 1 can'
imsg now if you still can.
2015-11-07
17:44:31, Sat
OUTBOX
As I've told , I'll do whatever she wants me to.
2015-11-07
INBOX
22:30:10, Sat
2015-11-08
15:14:42, Sun
OUTBOX
Going into the office I'm about an hour and send
the procedures. (1 just went direct with Trisha - is fairly useless).
but realize there's no reason for you to come
to HQ this morning.
2015-11-08
15:18:55, Sun
INBOX
And is ENTIRELY worthless. Remind me story from 14.
2015-11-08
15:26:33, Sun
OUTBOX
The thing 1 most dislike - and even confirmed - is that if he screws
something up, like he was supposed to tell me x at noon but didn't
until 5, you absolutely know he will retell the story to a boss in the
light most favorable to him.
OUTBOX
1 guess.
16:36:19, Sun
INBOX
Can you at least take your phone inside of the conferences? If it's oi, 1
doubt it. And that really sucks.
2015-11-09 OUTBOX Nope I can't. It's in oi.
13:00:08, Mon |_
41
DOJ-PROD-0000029
Strzok-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2015-11-09
INBOX
God that sucks.
13:01:12, Mon
2015-11-09
13:01:51, Mon .
OUTBOX
1 wish. Would have been the highlight of the day.
2015-11-09
13:04:31, Mon
INBOX
\U0001f606 and \U0001f61e
2015-11-09
13:06:42, Mon
INBOX
What time do you start?
2015-11-09
13:07:56, Mon
OUTBOX
9:00. But have to go to nslb first
2015-11-09
13:10:01, Mon
INBOX
That stinks. Heading into headquarters now. Should you suddenly
want to run off for lunch, let me know. Although 1 may have to speak
at WFO over lunch.
2015-11-09
22:20:37, Mon
INBOX
2015-11-11
13:41:24, Wed
INBOX
A) didn't get anything. Assume you mean unet emai!.\n\nB) ok. Then
will plan on going in, hopefully it works out. 2-4 is best bet, obviously
no guarantees?
2015-11-11
13:43:30, Wed
OUTBOX
B) yes
2015-11-11
20:14:17, Wed
OUTBOX
Hey heads up in the ofc, just walking out now.
2015-11-11
20:15:04, Wed
OUTBOX
1 texted her earlier to see if she wanted to join is to EM, is just leaving
now so just getting it.
2015-11-12
01:40:07, Thu
OUTBOX
Well 1 also paused be 1 didn't want you to freak out since it's a really
remote chance anyway.
2015-11-12
01:42:12, Thu
INBOX
1 am of course going to encourage you to do it...
2015-11-12
01:42:36, Thu
OUTBOX
Sure it is. And seriously, you couldn't to worry for a year about
something that is very unlikely to happen?
2015-11-12
01:54:45, Thu
INBOX
Tou should tell me - only makes it worse. I'm glad you did. And
I’m going to keep trying to persuade you to do it.
2015-11-12
01:56:22, Thu
OUTBOX
It's not even a point of persuasion.
2015-11-12
01:57:16, Thu
INBOX
And 1 told you aboul right? And we'll be having
similar convos whenever 1 hit 12-18 months at HQ...\n\nWould you
get some sort of housing help? TDY-type $
2015-11-12
01:57:49, Thu
INBOX
He would love SF more than you even, right?
2015-11-12
01:58:22, Thu
OUTBOX
Yes he would.
2015-11-12
01:59:54, Thu
OUTBOX
Yes, he would. Have no clue about tdy money or housing. Obviously a
big issue.
42
DOJ-PROD-0000030
Strzok-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2015-11-12
02:01:19, Thu
INBOX
You should go to SF. I'll set a reminder to bring it up in April.
2015-11-12
02:25:33, Thu
INBOX
Of course. I'm going to drag you by Peregrine...When's your meeting
with Trisha?
OUTBOX
Yeah, might not be able to. Mtg is at 10. Let me see if 1 can get on
unet email -1 never remember how. 324mail.com?
2015-11-12
02:37:14, Thu
INBOX
Yep re 324
2015-11-12
INBOX
What are you trying to
03:03:47, Thu
check, btw? DoJ comments?
2015-11-12
03:06:42, Thu
OUTBOX
Is it .com?
2015-11-12
03:07:15, Thu
OUTBOX
Have to meet with trisha at 10, need to at least know what they say.
2015-11-12
03:07:47, Thu
INBOX
Make sure you get the "s"\nHttps://www.324mail.com
OUTBOX
So weird. 1 couldn't type it directly into the browser but could follow a
link.
INBOX
Yay. So it worked?
2015-11-12
03:17:27, Thu
OUTBOX
Yes. And sigh, DOJ. Questions, questions, questions.
2015-11-12
03:18:37, Thu
INBOX
Of course. We're dumb - even retarded - and Not To Be Trusted.
\n\nWho's providing comment from DoJ?
2015-11-12
03:19:02, Thu
OUTBOX
Oh, about 600 people. Nsd and civ.
2015-11-12
03:20:10, Thu
INBOX
Civ = crim? Ole? Oia?
2015-11-12
03:20:52, Thu
OUTBOX
No, the civil division at doj. The folks who defend us when we get
sued, like over nondisclosure of an nsl.
2015-11-12
INBOX
You can always sh*t can all of their comments - after you tell
03:21:12, Thu
Trisha
2015-11-12
03:22:25, Thu
OUTBOX
Some are okay.\n^jg|3S
2015-11-12
03:37:13, Thu
INBOX
Oh. Well that makes sense. \n\nMaybe. Don't trust DoJ. No reason,
and that's unreasonable because most of them are just trying to do a
good job.\n\n
INBOX
Oh. OK, good.
2015-11-12
03:37:55, Thu
INBOX
But not really.
2015-11-12
INBOX
23:10:13, Thu
2015-11-13
14:04:16, Fri
INBOX
Headed to Wf for a meeting on NATs...back around 10.
43
DOJ-PROD-OOOOCI31
Strzok-Page Texts
Date UTC
2015-11-13
14:10:50. Fri
2015-11-13
23:49:58, Fri
2015-11-14
00:12:00, Sat
2015-11-14
00:24:45, Sat
|Type of Message
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
2015-11-15
21:35:03, Sun
2015-11-15
21:35:26, Sun
2015-11-16
23:15:36, Mon
2015-11-16
23:17:21, Mon
2015-11-19
11:50:48, Thu
2015-11-24
14:10:35, Tue
2015-11-26
00:20:54, Thu
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
2015-11-26 OUTBOX
00:26:05, Thu _
2015-11-26 OUTBOX
18:17:00, Thu
Happy to. I have about 600 emails to respond to, which just isn't
possible _
Yeah. Listening to the news, France's state of emergency allows the
state to exercise censorship across all media and suspends
requirements for warrants to enter private spaces. How's that
transparency and privacy rights for vou, EU?
Yeah, no shit.
I'm just emailing with an
this mandatory transparency scheme, just like the old days.
_ ■
Hop to it! Stupid
Somebody needs to ask how mandatory transparency balances
against 127 dead in Paris.
Yeah, no joke. And thanks for the sitrep.
And check out the balls on France. Just like that and they're
conducting airstream on Syria. __
Airstrikes, nor airstream. •
Yrah, but, France. They're probably dispensing leaflets with insults.
Sorry been having to restart to get coverage everybday. \U0001f621
Sent. \n\nAnd I know. These are awful. I'm willing to bet it's the
i software we put on there.
:{I'm sorry. \n\nYou could do what a third of ogc does and just nap in
Boo. Going alone to Peets. :(\n\nGood news other than Conf call with
OTD at 11 and lunch with Bill at noon, I'm free...
Spent about two hours shooting the sh*t with :oday.
Was a nice time. The problem with is he is just so damn likeable...
Hey have you told^^^^ that you're likely about to join the ses?
You shou ld. J will be very proud. \U0001f60a _
Have you told him about work yet? I'm going to be very angry if you
! don’t. \U0001f621
44
DOJ-PROD-0000032
Strzok-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2015-11-26
19:30:00, Thu
INBOX
C) not yet.
2015-11-28
OUTBOX
22:38:23, Sat
And what does have to say?
2015-11-28
22:39:54, Sat
INBOX
just wanted to shoot the shit. Talked about and everyone
leaving, catching hell about trying to get in to his place in CT, etc
2015-11-29
13:18:26, Sun
INBOX
And my unet password expired, this is buzzing every 15 minutes
saying login failure. Highly annoying. Also aggravating because 1 keep
thinking it's vou...\U0001f636
2015-11-30
13:16:26, Mon
INBOX
Yay. \u263a\n\nJust heard from D is coming down at 11:30, so
won't be able to leave for lunch until noon.
2015-11-30
22:22:26, Mon
INBOX
So IOD Ops 2 SC just posted as well....
2015-11-30
22:32:42, Mon
OUTBOX
You're telling me.
\U0001f636\U0001f636\U0001f636\U0001f636\U0001f636\U0001f6
36\U0001f636
2015-11-30
22:36:37, Mon
INBOX
You didn't say anything! !\U0001f636
2015-12-01
22:31:52, Tue
Sent you an article on Gmail
2015-12-01
INBOX
Talk about
22:40:41, Tue
\U0001f61d\U0001f61d\U0001f61d\U0001f61d!
2015-12-01
23:05:11, Tue
INBOX
So there's my serious proposal: figure out when you can and want to
go, and I'll set it up...
2015-12-01
23:05:38, Tue
INBOX
'Cause that's not future doing it wrong insurance....
2015-12-01
23:52:33, Tue
INBOX
Sorry. And got a 20 minute call from Gregg to come work for him and
"run the Bureau's 140 airplane Air Force."\n\nThen dealing with
stupid doj hesitancy to get us SW
2015-12-02
13:21:14, Wed
INBOX
\U0001f636\n\nHeading into sioc for 8:30. Hit me on email or 1 will
check back here as soon as I'm done.
2015-12-02
23:16:15, Wed
INBOX
Omg have a story. Let me know if you can talk. It can also
wait until tomorrow.
2015-12-02
23:27:05, Wed
INBOX
Also remind me about Harbachs replacement
2015-12-02
23:45:42, Wed
OUTBOX
He’s not a mountain man looking guy, is he? \n\nAnd sorry, just got
home.
2015-12-02
23:47:44, Wed
OUTBOX
Harbach's replacement. Saw and Rybicki with a huge strange
man today. No introductions were made, but he was clearly with
them.
2015-12-02
23:49:15, Wed
INBOX
Hmm. No, 1 don't think so. But that discussion not for here.
so 1 can imsg, too.
2015-12-02
23:50:04, Wed
OUTBOX
So who is his replacement? What do you know?
2015-12-02
23:50:52, Wed
INBOX
1 just told you, not for here! \u263a\n\nAnd cone of silence,
obviously.
45
DOJ-PROD-0000033
Strzok-Page Texts
Date UTC_
2015-12-02
23:51:25, Wed
Type of Message
Body
OUTBOX
So imsg me then!
2015-12-03
12:13:11, Thu
INBOX
Hi there. \U0001f60a Same here. Woke at 5, realized I'm at Quantico
until 10 tonight, and went back to sleep. Of course now I'm
scrambling.
2015-12-04
21:44:45, Fri
INBOX
If you are, Moffa's job goes Monday - any plug for him would be
appreciated.
2015-12-04 1 INBOX
23:36:20, Fri 1
And to confirm - you said it was ok to forward to rour email to
Andy?
2015-12-05
INBOX
Done; check email. Thank you.
00:10:20, Sat
2015-12-05
00:31:18, Sat
INBOX
4nd 1 cannot think of a more qualified
person. You will be awesome. \u263a\n\nAnd 1 forgot to mention,
Randy is taking upstairs with him.
•
2015-12-05
OUTBOX
4nd thank
00:35:23, Sat
you. \U0001f636 \U0001f636 \U0001f636 I'm suddenly really excited.
Scared, but very happy. \U0001f60a
2015-12-05
00:36:35, Sat
INBOX
Don't be scared. 1 get it, but you're SO ready. You've already done the
job, and worked with him...
2015-12-05
00:39:45, Sat
OUTBOX
It's not the job I'm scared about, but 1 am really scared about balance.
2015-12-05
INBOX
Make a pact more serious than the dedication
00:46:08, Sat
Andy, I'll be here every day going 110%,
and I'm going to want to stay late every night, but you MUST make
me leave each day by x:xx.
2015-12-05
INBOX
I get it. 1 would be, too.
00:46:47, Sat
2015-12-05
01:12:49, Sat
OUTBOX
Re your first, 1 just don't know. Of course Andy will be fine, it's me I’m
worried about. It might work if 1 have the discipline to work
but it's soooooo hard. And yeah, there goes
2015-12-05
INBOX
I'm glad.
01:14:26, Sat
Would there be an expectation that you would travel with Andy?
That you wouldn't?
46
DOJ-PROD-0000034
Strzok-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body !
2015-12-05
INBOX
Oh, 1 meant exactly that - that Andy would be fine
01:15:30, Sat
1 meant youd have
to apply that discipline to keeping a work schedule.
2015-12-05
INBOX
01:15:41, Sat
2015-12-05
01:17:12, Sat
OUTBOX
No clue re travel. 1 doubt it. Maybe if I really wanted to he'd do me
the favor, but mostly you don’t need a lawyer for anything.\n\nAnd
I last time with andy was different.
2015-12-05
INBOX
13:59:08, Sat
hope comes, too. She
stayed yesterday for a Cyber guy that showed up 45 minutes late (and
that we cancelled on due to end of day meetings). Hope that didn't
keep her from leaving as early as she wanted to. And CyD is WILDLY
disfunctional. 1 mean really bad. They can do individual investigations
but there is NO coherent program management. And this whole
Strat/Tac model has just served to further balkanize their efforts. 1
mean it's REALLY bad.
47
DOJ-PROD-0000035
Strzok-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2015-12-05
14:03:58, Sat
OUTBOX
Don't know much about CyD, really. Haven't worked with them since I
was a prosecutor.\n\nLots of socializing, but all constantly
accompanied.
2015-12-05
15:35:10, Sat
INBOX
Also, had a dark moment of not being able to go to sleep last night,
thinking 1 wouldn't get the job and having to save my pride by
stepping down if that happened...
2015-12-05
15:40:44, Sat
OUTBOX
fou're going to get the job. Randy made that clear, for
like the 100th time again yesterday. And truly, if something truly
freakish happens there are a) other jobs, and b) you love being an
agent and can always do casework. Not a sole who works with you
would fault you being you being totally wronged and saying f it, I'm
going back to street work. But truly, stop worrying. You're going to get
the job.
2015-12-05
15:42:17, Sat
INBOX
It didn't feel that way at 10:50 last night...lots of well, what if
puts in and talks to Bill, etcs...
2015-12-05
15:44:04, Sat
OUTBOX
That would be a grave injustice and it would seriously suck. But you'd
get through it, people would know it was utter bs, life would go on,
and you'd be stronger for it.
2015-12-05
15:48:33, Sat
INBOX
1 suppose. I am very good at reveling in insecurity. Did 1 send you
"esponse to my email last night?
2015-12-05
15:52:27, Sat
INBOX
It's always nice to have outside confirmation of what you think. Of
course, hardlv an unbiased observer.
2015-12-06
18:36:17, Sun
OUTBOX
2015-12-06
18:42:15, Sun
INBOX
2015-12-07
INBOX
Moffa
19:28:40, Mon
is on standby for his job interview. If he’s not done I'm going to have
to go at 3:10 or so.:(
2015-12-07
OUTBOX
Np. 1 don't expect it will be done. But thank you for coming.
19:43:33, Mon
2015-12-07
INBOX
1 have to go get Jim around 5:15.
21:16:42, Mon
2015-12-07
21:18:11, Mon
INBOX
Sorry was calling to see if 1 could catch you walking back. Headed back
intoSIOC
48
DOJ-PROD-OOOOCI36
Strzok-Page Texts
Date UTC
2015-12-08
13:06:47, Tue
2015-12-08
13:18:01, Tue
2015-12-08
14:14:55 , Tue
2015-12-09
14:17:51, Wed
2015-12-09
22:51:03, Wed
2015-12-09
22:51:48 , Wed
2015-12-09
22:53:25, Wed
2015-12-09
22:53:47, Wed
Type of Message
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
Body
There's about to be an interview on NPR that I know is going to
irritate me a Muslim leader who says it's not their community's job to
look after itself because they're not quote law enforcement quote
Heading in to hq soon. Will reach out after 8:30
Hi there. Done with mtg.
K I'm going to go back to sioc hit me on lync ,
Hi. Leaving now
I'm still walking over.
Yeah saw from lync you left late. And stupid
stood you up
As always.
2015-12-09
22:55:32, Wed
INBOX
Well he's an idiot. \U0001f636 I'm at Centrale
2015-12-10
02:10:16, Thu
INBOX
2015-12-10
15:44:53, Thu
OUTBOX
2015-12-10
15:58:46, Thu
OUTBOX
2015-12-10
16:08:54, Th u
2015-12-10
16:17:59, Thu
OUTBOX
INBOX
And in the "I'm awful" category, just explained I drew the intervening
week and will likely have a ton tondo, including overnight (s).
This is painful. Annual ethics training.
Oh boy. Sec D is doing a mock court for their training. Scripts and
everything. Apparently they have waaaaaaaaaaaaay too much time
on their hands._;__
Oh good, now
Who the f is
is doing a Cl brief on the OPM breach.
It sounds HORRIBLE
2015-12-10
16:18:17, Thu
OUTBOX
Sec D guy.
2015-12-10
16:19:34, Thu
OUTBOX
Now eap training. This is so painful. Stressors over the holiday
season? You have got to be kidding me. This is a considerable waste
of time.
2015-12-10
20:09:38, Thu
INBOX
You should start shouting at them. Liven things up.;)
2015-12-11
INBOX
And damn, Bowdich came across poorly in the most recent press
13:53:48, Fri
conference...
2015-12-11
14:01:44, Fri
OUTBOX
That sucks. I've thought he's otherwise been doing a pretty good job.
49
DOJ-PROD-0000037
Strzok-Page Texts
2015-12-17
10:02:31, Thu
INBOX
2015-12-17
11:44:54, Thu
INBOX
2015-12-17
OUTBOX
11:46:24, Thu
2015-12-17
11:49:05, Thu
INBOX
2015-12-17 1
12:04:55, Thu
OUTBOX
2015-12-17
22:10:17, Thu '!
INBOX
Aaaaand up early. To much exciting and important running through
my head. Sent you a draft of email to Bill; I'd appreciate your review
and comments. \n\nGotta get in and go through material for briefing,
jShouldn’t be hard but want to get my head around it.
See you in a while. Your 9 in cpc?
Yes, 5096 or something. Everyone and their mother going,
think Moffat too. Whatever.\n\nEmail looks perfect. Could substitute
distribution for devolution, but both work. Perfect tone, otherwise
totally excellent.
|\U0001f636 thanks.
,n\nWow. Yeah, Jon's analysts have been the ones going to the
meetings, I think. And/or Dina got him involved. Not sure if he'll go
since we have 10 with D. ___
Ah, forgot about that re jon. \n\nK, gotta hustle. Ttyl.
Almost to jeh.Jet me know if you need that ride
50
DOJ-PROD-0000038
Strzok-Page Texts
Date UTC
2015-12-18
21:39:14, Fri
Ty pe of Me ssage
INBOX
2015-12-18 OUTBOX
22:00:08, Fri
2015-12-18 INBOX
22:17:40, Fri
2015-12-18 OUTBOX
22:28:12, Fri
k n\nln
'answer to your Lync question, no contact. Didn’t pick up call to work
or cell, and no response to my VMs on both. Whatever.
i Missed the cute Christmas singing, but just couldn't get out of the
office until 4:00. Oh well.
No worries about I didn't show her the one in the
box, I just didn't want you to show the actual ornament. No problems
there. _
Sorry, we were (/are) battling ces on stupid sh*t.
I
| Why doubly sour? Be you had to fight with ces?
2015-12-18
22:52:55, Fri
OUTBOX
2015-12-18
23:01:05, Fri
INBOX
2015-12-19
00:23:00, Sat
OUTBOX
2015-12-19
00:27:19, Sat
INBOX
2015-12-19
OUTBOX
00:30:38, Sat
2015-12-20
19:04:54, Sun !
INBOX
2015-12-20
22:55:16, Sun
OUTBOX
2015-12-20
23:20:11, Sun
i
INBOX
2015-12-20
INBOX
SB 1 vW, 8
2015-12-20
23:37:53, Sun
OUTBOX
Wow, I hadn't heard this.\n\nSystemic Change Needed After Faulty
ITimes Article htt p://nyti.ms/22eflla _
Sigh. Never argue with a lawyer. ;)\n\nReading the mea culpa nyt
piece...
Want to give her gift before she goes and hit HH tomorrow eve.
Just want to email JHBtow to let her
know that I need to take some leave tomorrow.
Still doing something to keep them occupied.
11 will be in tomorrow mid-afternoon ish
I Oh right, forgot they're off tomorrow.
51
DOJ-PROD-0000039
Strzok-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
INBOX
Yeah and they slip into slugitude without oversight \U0001f612
2015-12-20
23:44:34, Sun
2015-12-20
23:53:24, Su n
2015-12-20
23:54:36, Sun
2015-12-20
23:54:53, Sun
2015-12-21
00:01:21, Mon
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
2015-12-21 INBOX
00:58:52, Mon _
2015-12-21 OUTBOX
01:19:12, Mon
2015-12-21
01:47:08, Mon
2015-12-21
01:57:34, Mon
2015-12-21
18:09:20, Mon
2015-12-21
18:19:52, Mon
2015-12-22
01 -44:42 Tue
2015-12-22
15:46:44, Tue
2015-12-22
16:50:40, Tue
2015-12-22
16:59:03, Tue
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
IlNBOX
i OUTBOX
2015-12-22 INBOX
17:29:29, Tue _
2015-12-22 OUTBOX
18:31:17, Tue
Didn't you say you had to be in the ofc for something on Monday?
I hope not otherwise....
Oh sh*t. And the meeting between the Office of Partner Engagement
and CD at 10. _______
1 can miss that without a big problem
So why not switch it around?
Go into the office then head back home midday.
What's better for you?
What an utter idiot.\n\nAn article to share: Donald Trump on Putin:
\u2018Nobody has proven that he\u2019s killed
anyone\u2019\nDonald Trump on Putin: \u2018Nobody has proven
!that he\u2019s killed anyone\u2019\nhttp://wapo.st/lPjfMkv
I_
No doubt. \U0001f612\n\nOk to gmail some pics?
Yeah right no blech! Especially the last, likely initiated by her...
\U0001f61d\U0001f61d\U0001f61d\U0001f61d\U0001f61d
At hq..dropping off present
Done. Just did TWO things to your office. \n\nThats what you get for
your Ions executive lunches.... :D
Serious question, is that a bad thing? \n\nAlso, remind me best quote
ever from _ at his SSA meeting _
Ho boy. We are SUPER early. Been wandering the 7th floor for like 20
minutes. __
Wow...there's a pretty cool hallway that I think may be the Secretary's
corridor. AS couldn't get Giacalone in. \n\nls there a snackbar?
Yup, we saw it, though we didn't try to get in, obviously.\n\nAnd
jesus, we need thr next section chief engaged, and frankly the dad.
Those folks care about rank, and we are definitely not sending the
_ ri ght level folks. _
Sounds about right...
And with with me now. \U0001f621
52
DOJ-PROD-0000040
Strzok-Page Texts
Date UTC
Body
2015-12-23
11:59:48, Wed
INBOX
And I'm sorry, all these troubles because of the move from Treasury
to DHS? That's why all these senior managers with 15+ years are
getting DUIs and not enforcing any rules? That suddenly sprang up
over night?
2015-12-23
12:47:40, Wed
OUTBOX
Jim cancelled lunch. May be getting coffee at 11 with him, he offered
but I think he was just being nice. Will let you know.
2015-12-23
12:52:15, Wed
INBOX
No, I'm driving in. 1 have no desire to spend anymore time on this
bullshit.\n\nOf course I'm thrilled g that your lunch is not open. I'm
sorry you don't get to see Jim, but selfishly. I'm happy.
2015-12-23
12:58:16, Wed
OUTBOX
Meeting him for coffee at 11'. Other than 2:00 with moffa. I'm free.
2015-12-23
14:47:46, Wed
OUTBOX
You want a coffee? I'm going to skip since I'm meeting Jim at 11
2015-12-23
14:47:57, Wed
INBOX
\U0001f621 stupid
2015-12-23
17:02:32, Wed
OUTBOX
Your call. Am done with jim, where should 1 meet you?
2015-12-23
17:07:04, Wed
INBOX
JG here don't come in
2015-12-27
21:41:25, Sun
OUTBOX
i
i
1 think the doj attorney in that story is with ccips. His name is familiar.
\n\nThen 1 read this other article. Man, people are
stupid.\n\nhttps://www.washingtonpost.com/news/local/wp/2015/l
1/05/maryland-family-faces-harsh-criticism-after-adopted-daughter-
featured-in-american-girl-
magazine/?tid=hybrid_experimentrandom_3_na
1 2015-12-27
23:36:45, Sun
INBOX
.
And re the article, yeah, Manassas, shocker. Same people who elected
That knucklehead ran against....
2015-12-28
18:26:14, Mon
'OUTBOX
It's sick, but 1 really like policy issues. And having tight deadlines.
Sigh...
2015-12-28
19:18:11, Mon
INBOX
Is that what doj wanted?
2015-12-28
19:18:32, Mon
INBOX
You get all our oconus lures approved?;)
2015-12-28
19:19:41, Mon
OUTBOX
No, it's just implicated a much bigger policy issue. I'll explain later.
Might even be able to use it as pretext for a call...:)
2015-12-29
OUTBOX
13:22:48, Tue
Email from further aggravates me.
2015-12-29
13:23:26, Tue
OUTBOX
Obviously you can't know anything about the cpc issue yet.
2015-12-29 INBOX Got it. See my response.
13:30:01, Tue_
53
DOJ-PROD-0000041
Strzok-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2015-12-29
14:03:50, Tue
INBOX
Truly, wouldn't worry too much about involvement. A) she's in
your chain of command (and 1 know attys are much more flat than
agents about that) B) realistically not anything you're going to be able
to do about it C) you're out of office without access to high side D) not
hurting you (other than your ego). You're plenty talented. Everyone
knows that. And you want to own your issue. Thats good and normal
and everyone knows that, too.\n\nl know you know all this. Just
trying to help you not let this be aggravating... \U0001f60a
OUTBOX
Yup, nothing 1 can do about it. It's aggravating because I'm not one of
the lumpies so 1 can handle my own sh*t.
INBOX
I'm certain mows that.
2015-12-29
14:13:23, Tue
INBOX
Andy knows that
OUTBOX
All the more aggravating then.
2015-12-29
14:17:34, Tue
INBOX
Look at the big picture though. It's less aggravating.
You're fine.
2015-12-29
14:20:48, Tue
OUTBOX
Yeah, when Mark finally finds a job 19 months from now. \U0001f612
2015-12-29
14:35:09, Tue
INBOX
Well you can blow the sh*t out of some CP stuff in the meantime.
;)\n\n(l'm NOT letting you be cranky thus morning - can you tell? Yes,
1 know I’m wildly ineffective so far...)
2015-12-29
14:45:27, Tue
OUTBOX
So long as you realize it...
2015-12-29
16:52:04, Tue
INBOX
Just ran into leaving some meeting with
2015-12-29
20:21:43, Tue
OUTBOX
Hey heads up I called your desk but someone answered. 1 didn't leave
a message but just fyi in case someone says a woman called for you
but didn't leave a name.
2015-12-29
INBOX
K. Just got done briefing Bill. Scheduled for 1 hour, took two. How
21:03:16, Tue
llong is your flight delayed?
54
DOJ-PROD-0000042
Date UTC
2016-01-02
14:49:01, Sat
T ype of Mess age
OUTBOX
2016-01-02
15:12:55, Sat
INBOX
2016-01-04
23:23:50 , Mon
2016-01-04
23:24:45, Mon
2016-01-04
23:38:50, Mon
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
nl feel like my calendar is pretty full this
week, have a vague sense of "better busy yourself up this week" if I
recall correctly. I'll probably just go in and check email, but I'm not sure
there's much else fun to do down there.
\U0001f636\n\n Higher up work people (the
ones you mentioned, Mark and JG, or Randy, for that matter) wouldn't.
And yes. I'm TOTALLY the same. I may unnecessarily care what people
think way more than you. I'm trying to get a comfort with sense of self
where I don't care. It's not so much on the professional work side (I
know I'm good enough that I can be confident and humble there) buy
on the interpersonal side.
No. Briefing on cpc issue
Whatever. Can't fool me. :D\n\nCall me though. Have a work question
to ask you.
Sorry still free to talk in 5?
Sheesh. Yes. \U0001f636
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-01-08
00:15:11, Fri
2016-01-08
00:23:11, Fri
OUTBOX
INBOX
Guess we'll find out.;)
Hope you have a peaceful evening. Happy to talk if you talk with Andy
but of course can wait. In that event I'll see if I can live up to my
resolution not to hound vou tomorrow.
He hasn't called, but in my sheepishness, I told him tomorrow was fine
too.
And respecting your family time (and probably driving you crazy) he'll
wait... _
He just texted me to hit him up tomorrow, so that’s good.
Ha. \n\nProbably right. \n\nJust calt him now? J*sus, get it over with.
At a minimum he's got the drive home.
No, he said tomorrow. I need to respect that. It's okay. I just meant it
wouldn't help/hurt my sleep any more or less than it usually does.
It’s just you have a very ready stable of people to schedule into the void
to stay busy. Me. not so much.
2016-01-08
00:25:42, Fri
2016-01-08
17:48:49, Fri
2016-01-08
18:50:56, Fri
2016-01-08
19:28:26, Fri
2016-01-08
22:11:48, Fri
2016-01-09
00:10:17, Sat
2016-01-09
01:02:50, Sat
OUTBOX
INBOX
! OUTBOX
INBOX
■ INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
You do as well. You're just not tapping them. Moffa, RJ,
Boone, etc etc etc.\n\nAnd soon, very soon, you will be just as busy as I
am and only able to run out for a quick bite between meetings. It's
going to be okay. _
I am staring at Jim Bakker, very animated, eating lunch at a window
table at pq. Can't tell who the gentleman is that he's eating with.
I can find out...
Hi. News from Bill...
Good lord I'm dying! Hurry up!!!!! \U0001f636
going APOPLECTIC over the idea of us calling
2016-01-09 INBOX
01:17:47, Sat
D) I'm not
kidding, I feel like punching in the face. You're now being too
nice. You can inform him ahead of time or after the fact of your
investigative steps, but you're not asking permission to speak to
someone at DOJ for fuck's sake. God I hate them.
D) finally talked to him. I will dial back my judgment, he found stuff
which makes it less likely we need to talk to her. Will explain next week.
2
DOJ-PROD-OOOOCI44
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-01-09
15:49:58, Sat
INBOX
|
And 1 had a sudden sad and true realization. You're going to leave the
Bu after Andy leaves. As hard as it was to go back to ogc last time, how
do you ever go do something outside of (and below) that level?
\n\nAnd that makes me deeply sad. \U0001f61f
2016-01-09
15:54:48, Sat
OUTBOX
1 know That's what I've been trying to tell you. Let’s pretend for a
moment that they didn't all hate me. Even without that, it would be
hard to go back. But with it, it's pretty impossible. 1 won't be gone
forever, vou never know.
2016-01-09
15:55:43, Sat
INBOX
Damn right if 1 make it to DD I'll bring you back as GC.
2016-01-12
22:33:58, Tue
INBOX
THAT SUCKS!!! !!\n\nKeep your head up though, it will work itself out in
a few months. Plus remember, job is going to be AWESOME.
2016-01-12
23:17:45, Tue
2016-01-14
03:23:16, Thu
2016-01-14
15:59:03, Thu
OUTBOX
INBOX
2016-01-14
15:59:44, Th u
2016-01-14
15:59:56, Thu
2016-01-14
16:00:08, Th u
2016-01-14
16: 00:36, Thu
2016-01-14
16:00 :43, Thu_
2016-01-15
10:53:29, Fri
2016-01-15
11:55:15, Fri
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
2016-01-15 OUTBOX
12:00:45, Fri
2016-01-15 'iNBOX
12:09:12, Fri
2016-01-15
12:12:10, Fri
OUTBOX
I know. It will. It just sucks when it's otherwise so undeserving.
And remind me what said about what she needs to do for herself-
detail, special assistant, etc
Andy (he chaired it, he was there), Mark, Randy,
Wow that that was quick
Others maybe offscreen but I didn't see.
15 minutes top. No idea how I did. Don't feel like I was a total idiot, so I
guess that's good. _
I know. Makes me worried too quick...
Of course they got started late so maybe they're hurrying.
Talked about figured that was.something of personal interest and
discom fort t o four of them... _
! No chance. They have their decision. That's a good sign..
The Brutalism of Ted Cruz http://nyti.ms/lmSbi92
And I was thinking, don't you think the D will tell you in person, since
you're meeting with him anyway? Ooh, I really hope he
does.\U00 Qlf60a\U0001f60a\U0001f60a .. .
And oh holy sh*t, I forgot I had huge single source reporting that I was
going to mention in the car! Remind me, though it may have to wait
until this afternoon. ____
Ooh. Can you imsg it? i will tell you what I was going to imsg,
scrambling to get out the door right now.\n\nAnd yeah, I thought about
I that with D. Don't know if it will travel that fast._
! Nope, too much detail, better to tell. But it involves ^U0001f60a
3
DOJ-PROD-OOOOCI45
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-01-15
OUTBOX
23:23:16, Fri
\n\nl will. \U0001f636
2016-01-16
22:09:48, Sat
INBOX
I'm getting aggravated with work. 1 need to realize that I'm not there,
have a limited amount of the total info, and need to step back.
2016-01-16
22:11:34, Sat
OUTBOX
And it's not even going to be your job in about two weeks. Still, I'm
sorry. Would it help put your mind at ease if you went in?
2016-01-16
22:12:48, Sat
INBOX
But it will be my job at HQ. No, I'm not going to achieve anything at
work. If 1 were on the ground it might help but I'm not.
2016-01-17
01:14:23, Sun
INBOX
Oh. Yay. You may need to head into work on Mon for some unexpected
issues on all this Iran stuff...
2016-01-17
21:59:38, Sun
OUTBOX
Hi. Just replied. That fox website has some amazing stuff.
2016-01-17
22:15:09, Sun
INBOX
Yes. Yes it does. Out for 5 if you want to email or imsg yourfavs....
2016-01-18
01:04:39, Mon
INBOX
Oh Jesus Carlin is on 60 Minutes. Talking about Chinese theft of trade
secrets. -nay be on there, too. God almighty.
2016-01-18
01:30:00, Mon
INBOX
IKB^fiBiSifiBSafi^ wasn't on it.
2016-01-18
03:13:35, Mon
INBOX
a freakshow
2016-01-18
03:14:59, Mon
OUTBOX
Yeah, that's what everyone says
2016-01-22
02:59:39, Fri
INBOX
Hey am 1 good to know that Jason is interested? He sent me a congrats
email
2016-01-22
03:02:25, Fri
OUTBOX
1 told him you got the job like not even an hour ago.:) 1 told him that
you were looking, was definitely interested. 1 don't see why
not.
2016-01-22
03:03:52, Fri
OUTBOX
Not that you were looking, but that.you might be. Told him be 1 didn't
want him to foreclose a possible opportunity in case you had a job and
it worked out. So yes, he can know we talked. Only makes sense.
2016-01-22
INBOX
He emailed me this afternoon. 1 told him i wanted to grab coffee.
03:06:01, Fri
2016-01-22
INBOX
F*cking marchers making traffic problems ....\U0001f621
17:48:36, Fri
2016-01-22
17:50:34, Fri
OUTBOX
Yeah, some extremely offensive video screens set uo in front of dist ct.
1 truly hate these people. No support for the woman who
actually has to spend the rest of her life rearing this child, but we care
about "life." Assholes.
2016-01-22
INBOX
And literally I'm the last car thru 4 lights as they shut down
17:52:59, Fri
Pennsylvania Ave. Hey, 1 have an idea! Snow emergency, cancel the
permit
4
DOJ-PROD-OOOOCI46
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-01-24 ■
21:57:26, Sun
INBOX
B) fortunately there will still be snow tomorrow. \nA) special counsel
implies an ogc position, though, right? And would you get those emails
if you weren't in OGC? Regardless, that worry about lane will resolve
itself out once you get a chance to start working. One of those
impossible to know now. But it will be fine. 1 promise.
2016-01-24
21:59:19, Sun
INBOX
Is your title that big a deal to you at the end of the day? Not saying it
shouldn't be, just trying to understand where it ranks within your
priorities.
2016-01-24
22:01:53, Sun
OUTBOX
I'm not sure 1 agree. If trisha's whole point of putting :here is to
ensure more reliance on ogc, I'm not sure she's embrace me acting
pretty independently, which is the only way 1 know how to be. Will
forward a couple of emails - not a perfect example but maybe a little
demonstrative. There are other "special counsels", the D's, one in OCA.
I'm sure they're grandfathered, but 1 don't think Jim or especially trisha
will want me to suggest I'm a lawyer if I'm not in ogc.
2016-01-24
22:05:23, Sun
OUTBOX
Pretty important to me, actually. Especially if 1 plan to leave the bureau,
1 want my title to reflect the work I'm doing. Wtf is a special assistant to
the private sector? Chief of staff would be fine, but 1) that's not the job
I'll be doing and 2) Rybicki has made pretty clear he's opposed to me
using that title. I'm a lawyer, it's my identity, it's what I'd like to call
mvself. ... .
2016-01-24
22:12:54, Sun
INBOX
1
Completely understand. So stay in OGC and be special counsel. Why
does JB not want that? Particularly if that means they have some
connection to your job? A lot of OGC are dummies but Jim and Trisha
are not and vou can work with both of them...
5
DOJ-PROD-0000047
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-01-24
22:13:55, Sun
INBOX
And you won't be COS...not worth fighting that for all the reasons you
mention.
2016-01-24
22:14:41, Sun
INBOX
And you can act independently and have weekly meetings with her
and/or Jim
2016-01-24
22:17:18, Sun
OUTBOX
I'm not sure you're following me. 1 imagine JB and TA WILL want me to
stay in ogc. What I'm saying is 1 don't want to second guess or worry
about whether 1 am stepping on their toes, especially trisha be she's so
hard to read, and is still developing her relationships with our execs,
esDeciallv andv.
2016-01-24
22:21:59, Sun
■INBOX
Oh, I've got you. I don't have an easy answer, particularly if you want
the special counsel title. If you do, 1 think you likely need to be in OGC,
and you're going to have to feel out the relationships. JB will be much
easier than Trisha.
2016-01-24
22:23:32, Sun
INBOX
Because in some ways you are going to step on Trisha's toes. But I think
if Andy is clear with what he wants (amd i think he will be) that will help
tremendously.
2016-01-24
22:24:48, Sun
OUTBOX
Yes, she is entirely my worry. I've done this job with Jim as GC, and he is
the least egotistical and most secure/non- threatened guy. We get each
other. It’s trisha who will feel threatened. Plus woman thing.
2016-01-24
22:25:52, Sun
OUTBOX
1 guess re Andy. But he respects hierarchy a lot too.
2016-01-24
22:37:47, Sun
INBOX
Well but HE wants you to work for him. So let him take the lead on role
and expectations, and have that dialogue with J8, maybe without you
there.
2016-01-25
02:16:32, Mon
INBOX
Hi. Been thinking a lot about you, your new job, jb, and Trisha. No
spectacular insights, but looking forward to talking to you about it.
2016-01-25
03:43:31, Mon
OUTBOX
Oh good, me too, because I'm stressed.
2016-01-25
12:02:13, Mon
OUTBOX
Hi there. Appreciate your email. If history is any guide, Jim will include
me on most emails to the DD, so 1 realize that will help. How to
navigate Trisha, especially if I'm still tied to ogc, and especially with
in his position (and presumably still TIGHT with her), just has me
stressed.\n\nAnd that's cool re 1 totally want to hear that story.
And sheesh, SO military that both days he's sending emails by 5:30.
Please do not share, nhviouslv
2016-01-25
23:52:15, Mon
OUTBOX
By Adam Goldman, no surprise. \n\nAn article to share: How David
Petraeus avoided felony charges and possible prison time\nHow David
Petraeus avoided felony charges and possible prison
time\nhttD://waoo.st/lNvlhph
2016-01-26
00:11:44, Tue
OUTBOX
You need to read the article. A lot of inside
information in there. And jesus, why is on every big case?!
iust not that good!
2016-01-26
00:13:35, Tue
INBOX
Yes, and i did. Who's talking? I'm guessing. But also
2016-01-26
00:14:47, Tue
OUTBOX
Yes to both, but we also both know a soon to be departing exec happy
to stick it to DOJ...
6
DOJ-PROD-OOOOCI48
Srtzok-Page Texts
INBOX
Yeah but was he that intimately involved? Was that on his watch? 1
guess the resolution was, right?
2016-01-26
00:16:29, Tue
OUTBOX
Yeah, just the end of it all.
HUH
INBOX
And J*sus just pack it in and go home!
2016-01-26
00:19:36, Tue
OUTBOX
And remind me convo with e tdy vs permanent position. She
agrees go permanent, thinks I'm right to be nervous about navigating
TA.
2016-01-26
00:20:27, Tue
INBOX
Ooh. Def want to hear about that. How was her attitude about
it?
2016-01-26
00:21:03, Tue
INBOX
If you weren’t OGC and couldn't have special counsel title, what would
you take? You sure JB wouldn't let you?
2016-01-26
00:22:11, Tue
INBOX
Not sure the ins and outs of position creation. Think Jon went thru that
when working for Bob. 1 can ask him in a general, non attributable way.
2016-01-26
00:22:36, Tue
OUTBOX
Attitude about what? \n\nTA not thrilled about my keeping the title,
not sure Jim will care. also suggested special advisor, which 1 could
live with...
2016-01-26
00:23:07, Tue
OUTBOX
Don't ask yet. Will let you know.
2016-01-26
00:27:18, Tue
INBOX
attitude towards you about you going to work for Andy. Special
Advisor is what all the RPO folks were to various ADs. 1 think it's
for example. \n\nOh, I could bring it up in no way related to you. Have
talked about it a few times already, just in the context of him and
Randv.
2016-01-26
00:28:21, Tue
INBOX
Also, you notice looks good in that article?
2016-01-26
00:50:15, Tue
OUTBOX
Didn't see a pic.\n\nShe seemed genuinely supportive and wanting to
help me resolve my conflict. Think she’s fine with me working for Andy,
obviously it's been known/expected to her since the beginning.
2016-01-26
00:52:25, Tue
OUTBOX
And what is there to talk about with Moffa? I’m not concerned about
Andy's ability to get me a permanent gig with him. He's the DD. Plus
he's been ADD, so he likely already knows what he needs to do.
2016-01-26
00:54:26, Tue
OUTBOX
Oh is characterized positively. Yeah, I noticed that. The likelihood that
he was some strong advocate seems like revisitionist history.
2016-01-26
00:58:05, Tue
INBOX
Just the actual physical steps of creating a position. 1 know it can be
done. Just the step 1 step 2 stuff.
2016-01-26
00:58:59, Tue
INBOX
Agreed re And makes me dislike all oitchy don't talk to the
media implications.
2016-01-26
00:59:30, Tue
INBOX
Sorry if 1 missed you, this thing buzzed once with your last text. 1 hate
these things...
2016-01-26
01:03:55, Tue
OUTBOX
Yeah, hold off for now re the position.\n\nRe suppose it could
also be the usao. likes to tell people what they want to hear,
could be they thought was on their side.
DOJ-PROD-0000049
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-01-26
01:07:18, Tue
INBOX !
2016-01-26
01:08:09, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-01-27
23:39:46, Wed
INBOX
2016-01-27
23:48:21, Wed
OUTBOX
2016-01-28
00:18:13, Thu
INBOX
! Maybe. You don’t think
would talk?
! I totally do! J ust saying it's another possibility.
Of course I'm sitting here thinking about you and your new job and
want to talk about it...
n\nAnd yes, realized I haven't yet discussed my ogcfsl issue at
all with Not being a lawyer is a fairly big deal. I need to do that
Oh god, that’s horrible. I'm so sorry. \n\nAndy is super busy -1 know it’s
no consolation, but he's sudden facing a three (or two and a half, with
dmv trip) day week. It's going to be OK._
2016-01-28
00:19:13, Thu
OUTBOX
Yeah, 1 know. 1 get all of that. 1 just need 10 minutes to put my damn
mind at rest.
2016-01-28
00:27:22, Thu
INBOX
1 know. 1 truly do. And i know i cant say anything that's going to fix that.
2016-01-28
01:51:32, Thu
OUTBOX
Sigh. And Andy just texted me the following:\n\nSo sorry 1 missed this.
Crazy day. Trying to move our lunch to Friday?\n\nl told him that
had told me and that 1 appreciated it very much. Sigh. Maybe one day
I'll actually engage in a little less self-doubt...
2016-01-28
INBOX
11:58:00, Thu
Supposed to meet Bill this morning at 9. trving to make it. not sure
about his schedule or roads.
\nd yay on office. \U0001f636\n\nAnd was thinking Andy may be
entirely consumed by Oregon thing right now. Mark was when 1 last
hripfed D. and thev hadn't even sons overt vet....
2016-01-28
12:08:47, Thu
OUTBOX
1 know, 1 know. He's super busy. Sounds like he and had a good
convo though, and now he's anxious (in a good way) to hear what we
have to say. So hopefully lunch with him actually sticks tomorrow.
2016-01-28
12:58:50, Thu
INBOX
Unrelated, re you think 1 should talk to or First? Or
together?
2016-01-28
13:03:18, Thu
OUTBOX
Thank you. \U0001f636\n\nl think you should talk to and
together first, and just recount what you intend to say. 1 mentioned
what we had talked about to when she came over, but only briefly.
Then ask them whether you talk to alone or with
2016-01-28
13:06:53, Thu
INBOX
Ok thanks.'
2016-01-29
00:41:27, Fri
INBOX
Did you milkshake with Talked and prepped anyway?
Are you sneaking in lunch tomorrow EVEN THOUGH YOU HAVE BEEN
PROHIBITED FROM EATING?!?!?!? (or is that just Andy?)
8
DOJ-PROD-0000050
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-01-29
00:50:30, Fri
OUTBOX
We didn't get milkshake but we did prep our list, and we are going to
sneak in lunch (no joke). Why is your day so full now?
2016-01-29
00:56:20, Fri
INBOX
Meeting agents in town on some
investigation, CD all hands was earlier on snow day rescheduled for
tomorrow. 1
■
2016-01-29
14:07:55, Fri
OUTBOX
Remind me, 1 remember the Rybicki story and 1 have an andy car story.
INBOX
Hi. 1 like my new job. \U0001f60a
2016-01-29
17:29:24, Fri
OUTBOX
Yay. And DD thing is at 1:00. Still in with andy.
2016-01-29
17:54:07, Fri
OUTBOX
Hey, just finished with andy, this is going to be great.
\U0001f60a\n\nWalking down with in 2, hopefully see you there.
2016-01-30
08:08:18, Sat
INBOX
Hi there. Wide, wide awake. 13,742 things to worry about in my new
job. \U0001f61e Nothing like self-doubt in the dead of the night...
2016-01-30
10:42:18, Sat
OUTBOX
fou were born to do this job. *1* have zero doubt. You're
going to be amazing.
2016-01-30
12:10:58, Sat
INBOX
Sigh. I've got to figure out staffing. 1 need a squared away assistant SC,
and that's assuming 1 can move along the current one. Plus UCs.
hasn't said anything, which is easy enough, I'll reach out to him,
although he can be wishy washy a bout what he wants. \n\nAnyway. Hi.
Doing it wrong, so I'll try and dial back now, having failed three and a
half hours aeo....
2016-01-30
12:13:34, Sat
OUTBOX
You are smart and good. People will want to work for you. \n\nAs.for
Jason, he's wildly sensitive to hierarchy and people's time. I'm sure he's
just waiting for vou to reach out.
2016-01-30
12:41:09, Sat
INBOX
And hey, what was the upshot of where you're sitting for the next 30
days. Where you are now?
2016-01-30
OUTBOX
■
12:46:32, Sat
\U0001f633\n\nStaying where 1 am for
30 days. 1 offered it, he was grateful be the politics of space are super
jacked up there right now.
2016-01-30
12:47:46, Sat
INBOX
Does he want the CMS room up there? Too late now?
2016-01-30
12:48:16, Sat
OUTBOX
Didn't ask be it's too late now anyway.
2016-01-30
12:50:30, Sat
INBOX
And.God, other than the head of Partner engagement, get all those
other assorted a holes out of there. ..Truly. Time to say, sorry, it's tight,
and it's important. No, the CIO doesn't need to be there. Sorry
Shut up This is where Rybicki could help. Be a COS - or
gell, let the DCOS do it. But someone's got to be a heavy.
2016-01-30
12:51:13, Sat
INBOX
There are some hard calls here, but also some easy ones. Too bad, so
sad. Got great space for you 100' this way...
DOJ-PROD-0000051
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-01-30
12:52:30, Sat
INBOX
And sorry we need your "war room." \U0001f621\n\nYou KNOW
that was a okay to make that HER office, right? Move her on to the
zero?
2016-01-30
12:53:27, Sat
OUTBOX
Yeah, that's not going to happen. 1 just have to be gracious and patient.
Not mv strong suits, but I'll survive. \U0001f612
2016-01-30
12:56:51, Sat
INBOX
Oh, you can't say sh*t. At all. Andy will eventually become so
exasperated about having to wait 5 minutes for you to walk down while
all the worthless lumpies are RIGHT THERE that he'll blow his top and
have someone do it.
2016-01-30
12:59:17, Sat
INBOX
Remind me to discuss interviews with you - who does certain ones
2016-01-30
13:06:47, Sat
OUTBOX
Interviews for what?
2016-01-30
13:08:14, Sat
OUTBOX
Oh, and you came up very briefly during chat with and andy. Remind
me.
2016-01-30
13:09:32, Sat
INBOX
Will explain elsewhere. And a Q for you I'll send elsewhere. And
what?!?!?!? Now I'm TOTALLY curious.
2016-01-30
13:18:28, Sat
OUTBOX
\n\n Nothing big. Just talking about getting
his 15, being an agent came up, andy said to me 1 thought you were
supposed to take care of this! 1 exclaimed that 1 tried, said yeah, she
and pete, and 1 told him how you and ! would take turns harassing
He chuckled.
2016-01-31
04:06:13, Sun
OUTBOX
1 know it is. I'll definitely be in at some point, have to consolidate
comments for another paper. Probably around 2:00? 1 will
let vou know as soon as 1 have a sense of it.
2016-01-31
18:12:48, Sun
OUTBOX
No, 1 can't be the IOB I'm adjudication relates to a TS docket. And I need
the application in front of me to explain what the order allowed, why
it's an iob.
2016-02-03
00:34:54, Wed
*
INBOX
Also, fYl, 1 just hit up and about the matter we talked about
briefly just now. They owe me detail about what we’re going to tell the
D, & 1 wanted to remind them it was still outstanding for our brief on
Thursday.
2016-02-03
00:36:11, Wed
INBOX
Just wanted you to be aware of it in case you brought it up with her and
conversation, that it didn't seem too coincidental. In fact, 1 guess it's
fine, because it really is coincidental. Great minds thinking
alike.\UQ001f636
2016-02-03
00:36:55, Wed
OUTBOX
It is, but! won't bring it up.
2016-02-03
00:50:33, Wed
OUTBOX
And 1 know who I'm going to ask about whether 1 should say something
to Trisha - Jason Herring.
2016-02-03
01:13:08, Wed
INBOX
Good idea. Even with him in the Caribbean? Or when he gets back?
2016-02-03
01:27:19, Wed
OUTBOX
Will just email, say 1 have an interpersonal work question, not
urgent.\n\nThought the more 1 think about it, the more 1 want to simply
ask trisha to remove me from future requests, just have them come
from her.
10
DOJ-PROD-OOOOCI52
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-02-03
01:29:11, Wed
INBOX
The problem with that is if whoever gets the tasking has questions, you
want them to go to you. And if Trisha does that (cuts you out), it
creates additional work for her to be the intermediary, right?\n\nAnd, F
2016-02-03
01:45:19, Wed
OUTBOX
1 really do hate him. Of course I'm swirling around and around and
around in my head about what to do.
2016-02-03
01:50:11, Wed
OUTBOX
1 really truly hate He is good at nothing, ineffective at
nearly everything he does, and phenomenally lacking in self-awareness.
2016-02-03
01:51:49, Wed
INBOX
1 of course forgot it. Will need to ask when I'm not obviously on my
phone. She didn't remember his last name...\n\nAnyway... is an
ahole. Always will be. There is literally nothing you can do to change
him or his opinion. And people realize he's a d*ck - so it truly becomes
an issue of judging someone by their enemies. While it may drive you
CRAZY, may be best simply to rise above this (never forget it) and take
thp hipher rnarl
2016-02-03
01:51:57, Wed
INBOX
Agreed. So why do you give him any power over you?
2016-02-03
01:53:19, Wed
INBOX
He is inconsequential. His opinion holds no value to anyone worth a
damn. He is one of the unfortunate dregs of society, and the fact that
he behaves this way towards you does nothing but speak well of you.
2016-02-03
01:53:39, Wed
INBOX
Haters gonna hate. Shake it off.;)
2016-02-03
01:55:16, Wed
OUTBOX
Honest to god, I'm not this time. F him. The Deputy Director picked ME
to work for him, and 1 goddamn earned it, and he will never be asked to
manage anything important for the rest of his career at the FBI. The
swirl is whether to say anything to trisha. Of course now I'm leaning
back toward no...
2016-02-03
02:01:04, Wed
OUTBOX
Good summary of Not sure why they leave Snowden
entirely out of it, but that's why that DB max schrems sued...
2016-02-03
02:02:21, Wed
INBOX
Lisa, that's all true. And if you want to rub his nose in it and destroy
him, you can. This is not the moment. But honest to God 1 think that's
the wrong choice. \n\nWhy do you think he's such a little prick? Exactly
BECAUSE he will never be asked to manage anything important at the
FBI. Feel sorry for him, not angry at him. He is displaying HIS weakness,
his flaws, his shortcomings. Nothing else. Float past it unperturbed like
the all star you are. Success is the best revenge.
2016-02-03
02:06:48, Wed
INBOX
And the higher you are, the more visible. The greater the number
of fans. And the greater number of dB haters. This is a good baptism by
fire. Because he's such an ass, hopefully it’s easier to move past. If the
thought of him gets you down, then think of the response you got from
and Randy and John and Andy. He will never get that. Ever.
2016-02-03
02:07:54, Wed
OUTBOX
1 know. 1 know, 1 know, 1 know. \U0001f636
11
DOJ-PROD-0000053
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-02-03
02:10:09, Wed
OUTBOX
Okay. I'm not going to say anything. I know this is going to spin out of
control (I'd bet any amount of money that he is going to tell KDM, who
is going to feel obligated to say something to trisha, who I hope and
pray will have my back and not assume I’ve done something to bring it
on mvself).
2016-02-03
02:10:53, Wed
OUTBOX
God, it's very hard for me not to want to get in front of this.
INBOX
2016-02-0B OUTBOX
02:16:12, Wed
2016-02-03 INBOX
02:17:10, Wed _
2016-02-03 INBOX
02:17:47, Wed _
INBOX
2016-02-03 OUTBOX
02:23:07, Wed
2016-02-03
02:52:37, Wed
INBOX
2016-02-03
02:52:59, Wed
INBOX
2016-02-03
12:24:26, Wed
INBOX
2016-02-03
12:48:07, Wed
OUTBOX
2016-02-03
12:55:42, Wed
INBOX
2016-02-04
00:37:26, Thu
INBOX
Trisha knows you are imminently capable. She knows he's a d*ck. It will
be o k. ,_
Yes, but my reputation is that I have "sharp elbows." So yes, I'm
capable, but she doesn't necessarily know whether I played a role in
this going south.
One data point. She will have a thousand. And she already has many
with you. \U0001f636 \U0001f636 \U0001f6 36_
Kill him with kindness. You have far, far - wildly so - more power.
Why does HE bother you so?
They all do. It's not just him. Honestly, because I'm painted unfairly.
And I KNOW it's because of jealousy and I KNOW there's nothing I can
do about it. But my sense of fairness is as foundational a part of me as
literally any single trait I can think of. It's why I'm in government, why
public service is a calling for me. So I think it is just very hard for me to
let go when something is unfair.
Yeah there's no good answer to the fairness thing, \n\nl lovehate him. I
get it.
Well, mostly hate. Shame\U0001f61e
That sucks. I'm sorry. How are you feeling about after a night of
ladmittedly poor sleep? _
! I don't know. Whatever. Angry. Resolved to leave ogc after this.
Probably not going to say anything and will just steam inside instead.
Well at a minimum, I think you should talk to Jason. Even if it doesn't
change anything decision wise, it's another voice to confirm that you're
doing the right thing, even if that's not particularly satisfying.
Just had a great convo with one of the two new agents that the section
picked up today. I knew her from WFO, public corruption agent. She's
very excited and told me that she wouldn't let me down and that I
wouldn't regret it. So that makes me happy.\U0001f60a
2016-02-04 'OUTBOX
00:46:23, Thu I
2016-02-04 OUTBOX
00:48:25, Thu
Picked up as an ssa?
And I know you're super busy, but you need to spend some time down
there with them every week or two. It's your responsibility to start
I identifying and cultivating the next generation of leaders in CD...
12
DOJ-PROD-OOOOCI54
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-02-04
00:53:18, Thu
INBOX
Yes. 1 had nothing to do with the pick, so glad she's good. Don't know
the guy from NY but the unit chief likes him and he's done decent cases
in NY, so that's good. Need to get some people who actually know our
work, though.
2016-02-04
11:19:17, Thu
OUTBOX
1 am really tired of these feckless international bodies having opinions
about sh-t they truly know nothing about. \n\nBBC News: UN panel
'rules in Julian Assange's favour’\nUN panel 'rules in Julian Assange's
favour’ - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-35490910
2016-02-04
11:39:26, Thu
INBOX
Add it to the list of why to hate the UN...I mean, c'mon. Thats
infuriating.\n\nSorry about all the sick. Depending on when my 11 with
DoJ and ead finishes, may be able to give you a ride.
2016-02-04
11:43:21, Thu
OUTBOX
It’S just Utter bs. HE IS NOT DETAINED THERE. He is CHOOSING to
remain there be he doesn't want to be arrested. Then he'd be goddamn
detained. F-er.
2016-02-04
12:21:17, Thu
INBOX
And, to be clear, detained if he leaves because he allegedly raped
someone. An alleged violent sexual assault.
2016-02-04
OUTBOX
Yes. Poor Julian.
12:24:24, Thu
\lso
two stories, remind me: 1) Andy's Porsche is parked in the garage (he
doesn't want to drive it home until the roads are less nasty) so let's go
find it. 2) Figured out why s different - he's both very mature and
wildly immature at the same time. Have the perfect story to
demonstrate this, re Steinbach.
2016-02-05
00:06:36, Fri
INBOX
ust
1
leaving, talked with JR just now and was able to answer Qs he hac
ssci tomorrow.
for D
2016-02-05 INBOX And damn these 12 hours days are ROUGH
13:16:43, Fri __
2016-02-05 OUTBOX It's good preparation for when you're DD. \U0001f60a
13:31:41, Fri ___
2016-02-05 INBOX Only if you'll be the GC...
17:33:53, Fri_
2016-02-05
17:34:41, Fri
INBOX
Or DGC. That would work, too
2016-02-05
23:23:22, Fri
INBOX
Have got a STORY for you. \U0001f620
2016-02-05
23:55:01, Fri
OUTBOX
What?!!
2016-02-06
00:04:32, Sat
INBOX
Work, but not for here. Agency F’ed uo big. Will get to Andy, prob Mon.
Not telling you in that capacity, want to vent as a friend. Better to talk
around it - how long are you at dinner? 1 can do a work call later or
tomorrow....
2016-02-06
15:36:05, Sat i
OUTBOX
Hee hee, Andy is funny. He sent me his gmail, and said "Don't sent me
anything classified, especially TS/SAP. Thanks."
13
DOJ-PROD-OOOOCI55
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-02-09
00:18:58, Tue
OUTBOX
Could you resend that judicial watch thing please?
2016-02-09
00:22:10, Tue
INBOX
Is your mailbox full or something? My resend attempt is hanging in the
outbox
2016-02-09
00:22:45, Tue
OUTBOX
Crap. Could be.
2016-02-09
00:23:31, Tue
INBOX
Just sent a third time. Looks like it went thru
2016-02-09
00:23:57, Tue
OUTBOX
Got it. Thank you.
2016-02-09
00:24:32, Tue
INBOX
Not a big deal re the letter, 1 can give you background on discussion
about it between D and JB if you want. Was during the second to last D
brief
2016-02-09
01:34:37, Tue
INBOX
Really interesting convo with from edva. Remind me to tell
you.
2016-02-09
02:21:19, Tue
INBOX
He was an associate deputy director. Because we let those assholes into
our organization without reciprocity. Because it's so great for us.
Witness what you're watching. Thanks
2016-02-09
02:22:01, Tue
OUTBOX
talking iike one of us. It's offensive.
2016-02-09
02:24:40, Tue
INBOX
a douche. Another win for Kortan and the OPA machine...
2016-02-09
12:09:42, Tue
OUTBOX
I Miss Barack Obama http://nyti.ms/lmoVWIF\n\nHaven't been thrilled
with him, but David Brooks is right.
2016-02-09
OUTBOX
12:12:13, Tue
|Un\nSanctions Lifted, American Tourists Head to Iran
http://nyti.ms/lLbGwxR
2016-02-09
12:58:43, Tue
OUTBOX Okay and now I'm sick to my stomach. Andy is having us meet at 915 to
1 talk about the D’s brief yesterday.
2016-02-09
13:00:10, Tue
INBOX
Lisa - it's going to be OK. Who’s meeting - just the two of you?
2016-02-09
13:00:26, Tue
OUTBOX
Everyone who was there minus
2016-02-09
13:01:35, Tue
OUTBOX
With a disclaimer at the bottom that it was mandatory and no
substitutions.
2016-02-09
13:02:06, Tue
INBOX
So why are you sick to your stomach? If he had any issue with what you
did, he'd talk to you alone...
2016-02-09
13:09:41, Tue
OUTBOX
Could be a finger wag for all of us? Or me and Mike, but didn't want to
iust single us out?
2016-02-09
13:10:46, Tue*
2016-02-09
13:27:06, Tue
OUTBOX
Me, baker, Steinbach, beers, and What else is it?
INBOX
Finish arguing out what you should have but couldn't because it was in
front of the D. Worst case (and 1 think it's unlikely), he says hey let's get
the debate done BEFORE we prep the D. Even that's not bad.
2016-02-09
13:27:26, Tue 1
INBOX
And PSheesh.
14
DOJ-PROD-OOOOCI56
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-02-09
13:29:41, Tue
OUTBOX
1 should have said something to him yesterday about knowing 1
misplayed it.
2016-02-09
17:03:47, Tue
INBOX
It's going to be ok. You're in the club..
2016-02-09
23:51:22, Tue
INBOX
And what makes me really angry about that Apple thing? The fact that
Tim Cook plays such the privacy advocate. Yeah, jerky, your entire OS is
designed to track me without me even knowing it.
2016-02-09
23:59:59, Tue
OUTBOX
1 know. Hypocrite.
2016-02-10
00:02:58, Wed
INBOX
And ha, 1 had mine already turned off. Apparently I'm paranoid.
2016-02-10
OUTBOX
00:06:16, Wed
2016-02-11
00:15:37, Thu
INBOX
Oh, and remind me to talk to you about talking to Jim Baker about
David.
2016-02-12
00:53:37, Fri .
INBOX
And remind me Trisha (and 1 don't know who else) had the idea of
sitting in on all these final interviews. Apparently she briefed Jim and
they decided no. Rubbed me the wrong way - if we're going to throw a
third FBI person in there, put me in there, as the SESer, much like an
SAC might participate.
2016-02-12
00:54:01, Fri
INBOX
Or at least ask the investigative team rather than being the good idea
faries from on high
2016-02-12
OUTBOX
Yeah, that's fair. You should say something politely to trisha.
01:25:51, Fri
2016-02-12
01:33:52, Fri
INBOX
Well, except Trisha works with Bill and JG. Though this ail explains JG's
"you and Jon should go, split them up, with at all of them."
Because he's got Jim and Trisha pushing her (as they did with
at State, in front of the Deputy and the D, without raising it before hand
-1 agreed to it, because 1 thought they were right, though 1 was a little
cranky about being put into a spot where 1 would potentially have to
argue otherwise in that group), and JG’s experience is having a senior
guy there. \n\nBecause it's a great spot for me to be in to be telling doj
"fewer people " while 1 simultaneously argue for two more for us.
\U0001f621
2016-02-12
01:35:41, Fri
OUTBOX
Well it's an investigation, not a prosecution. So there might be more
agents. 1 didn't totally follow your first paragraph.
2016-02-12
12:54:44, Fri
INBOX
There are a billion in the gym. Easy day. \n\nYep, also one of my SSAs
stepped down to be a pilot and works out if Manassas. \n\nWhat IS
doing about his SA application?
2016-02-12
OUTBOX
I'm SURE he left the car here while he is on vacation so we can do it
12:56:21, Fri
today.\n\nNothing. Not harassing him about it now. 1 get that he's
struggling with the decision.
15
DOJ-PROD-0000057
Srtzok-Paee Texts
2016-02-12
13:28:43, Fri
INBOX
Should 1 talk to him about it? It's just that there's such a fine line
between struggling and succumbing to inertia...
2016-02-12
13:29:31, Fri
OUTBOX
No, not right now. Andy just started...
2016-02-13
03:27:02, Sat
OUTBOX
I'm no prude, but I'm really appalled by this. So you don’t have to go
looking (in case you hadn't heard), Trump called him the p-word. The
man has no dignity or class. He simply can not be president. \n\nWith a
Slur for Ted Cruz, Donald Trump Further Splits Voters
http://nvti.ms/lXolCkO __
2016-02-13
03:28:49, Sat
INBOX
Oh, he's abysmal. 1 keep hoping the charade will end and people will
just dump him. The problem, then, is Rubio will likely lose to Cruz. The
Republican party is in utter shambles. When was the last competitive
ticket thev offered?
2016-02-15
00:05:34, Mon
INBOX
arguing about how great Bernie Sanders is and the evils of a two-
party system. \n\nSigh
2016-02-15
INBOX
YOU can explain
00:17:45, Mon
how Bernie isn't electable in a general election and it's more important
to field a competitive candidate....
2016-02-15
00:19:41, Mon
OUTBOX
Yeah, I'd be fighting the urge to be rude and dismissive and tell him he'il
realize he was wrong when he gets older.
2016-02-15
00:21:57, Mon
OUTBOX
Hell, at least be happy he's arguing for Bernie Sanders and not Ted Cruz.
2016-02-15
00:24:02, Mon
INBOX
,nC)
true re Cruz. THAT would be enough to put him on the street entirely.
2016-02-16
23:00:04, Tue
OUTBOX
Are you still at work? I'm so sorry if you are...:(
2016-02-16
23:38:15, Tue
INBOX
Yep been talking with Bill. Just got done.
2016-02-17
22:37:00, Wed
INBOX
I’m sorry. That stinks. Just pulled out of HQ.. sent me an email
explaining she lives 100 miles (!) from the airport and has ALWAYS used
a car service based on cost comparison. \U0001f612
2016-02-17
22:37:24, Wed
INBOX
Well, yes. Except your cost comparison is wrong.
2016-02-17 OUTBOX
22:38:10, Wed j
Oh sweet jesus.
2016-02-17 j INBOX
22:39:54, Wed :
She stopped by earlier but and were there. 1 am going to
have her grab her UC and stop by. I’m in the process of deciding
whether or not 1 talk to the unit chief, who approved it, before 1 talk to
both of them
2016-02-17 OUTBOX
22:40:57, Wed
1 probably would talk to the uc first. Just get a sense of it all.
2016-02-17 INBOX And I'm sorry, where the F do you live that is 100 miles from the
22:41:36, Wed airport? How much do you want to bet bwi is about 70 miles closer?
16
DOJ-PROD-OOOOCI58
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-02-17
22:42:14, Wed
OUTBOX
Can't you look up her address?
2016-02-17
22:42:53, Wed
INBOX
For sure. I'm going to have the UC do that. Good learning experience.
\U0001f612
2016-02-17
22:47:16, Wed
INBOX
May also have him research the various costs of parking at Dulles, to
ensure the cost comparison is right (it isnt) as well as the airfare from
8W1 to BJ...
INBOX
NOW HOW THE F CAN HE BE A REPUBLICAN? !?!?
OUTBOX
i
1 have absolutely no idea. Still, he is so very interesting.
2016-02-19
12:13:50, Fri
2016-02-19
13:06:40, Fri
2016-02-20
00:09:22, Sat
2016-02-20
11:59:31, Sat
2016-02-20
12:08:24, Sat
2016-02-20
12:30:52, Sat
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
2016-02-21 | INBOX
02:04:35, Sun
2016-02-21
02:05:44, Sun
2016-02-21
02:07:04, Sun
OUTBOX
INBOX
2016-02-22
23:25:21, Mon
2016-02-23
01:50:18, Tue
|Still really want to hear about how it went with Laufman, and with Bill.
I'm sorry I couldn't talk about it last night._
And of course I can't wait to tell you about Laufman convo, and Bill,,
Oh god. Anc^^^^ is trying to explain/defend apple's position.
Based entirely on the misinformation apple and privacy groups are
spewing.
I have a copy of you're interested.\n\n Justice Department Calls
Apple\u2019s Refusal to Unlock iPhone a \u2018Marketing
Strategy\u2Q19 http://n yti.rns/loPZDsj__
.In Nod to Law Enforcement in Apple Case, Obama Ends Attempt to
S traddle Privacy Divide http://nyti.ms/lQooMH6 _
The times, for once, does a decent job of explaining our position, for
ionce.
d I still have to do the D's talking points,
an, you know it's a bad day when you beat and rybicki into the
ce.
[i 1 Ml f
INBOX
17
DOJ-PROD-OOOOCI59
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-02-23
01:50:41, Tue
OUTBOX
What does he think?
2016-02-23
01:51:05. Tue
INBOX
It's interesting, I've got and David and him and everyone calling
me to survey the terrain. 1 guess that's good.
2016-02-24
INBOX
11:48:15, Wed
8:30.1 will arrive right about then and will be free until 910 when my
midyear brief starts. ■ : / r ‘ r[ -
■
2016-02-24
23:54:20, Wed
INBOX
Hey 1 know your evening sucks. 1 need to talk to you tonight about
work. Things went sideways with Andy and Bill. \n\nAt my desk, calling
to see if he is still here.
2016-02-24
23:57:18, Wed
INBOX
Sorry, I'm busy. Call back later.
2016-02-24
23:57:51, Wed
OUTBOX
He is I just got off the phone with him. He told me about wrap.
2016-02-24
23:59:51, Wed
INBOX
I'm talking to him now
2016-02-25
00:06:26, Thu
OUTBOX
Yup. Though truthfully, I'm not sure 1 understand what the problem is.
2016-02-25
00:15:04, Thu
INBOX
Sorry still on phone. Issue is if Laufman makes himself one of the two
DoJ, do 1 send the two case agents or insert myself. Andy told Bill send
the best two. And what "best" means isn't clear to me in this context.
2016-02-25
00:15:28, Thu
OUTBOX
Best means best. It's not a trick.
2016-02-25
00:15:52, Thu
OUTBOX
If Laufman does that, then that's doj's loss. And 1 think warrants a call to
his superiors.
2016-02-25
01:00:20, Thu
INBOX
Hi. Just leaving. Trisha still there (or at least her car is). Saw leaving,
too, though be didn't see me
2016-02-25
01:02:07, Thu
INBOX
We talked about it, but "best" was not in terms of agents (though that's
what 1 wrote). It's about what the best outcome is.
2016-02-25
02:20:31, Thu
OUTBOX
Do you or Bill fundamentally believe that 3 and 3 is the RIGHT thing for
the case? If the answer is no, then you call aack and say we're good
as is. You have never wavered from saying 2 and 2 is best. 1 don't get
what the hesitation is now.
2016-02-25
02:52:46, Thu
OUTBOX
One more thing: she might be our next president. The last thing you
need us going in there loaded for bear. You think she's going to
remember or care that it was more doi than fbi?
INBOX
Agreed. 1 called Bill and relayed what we discussed. He agrees. 1 will
email you and ;ame.
OUTBOX
Cool. You going to call back? 1 have one more thing to say, so long as
you are out of earshot of folks.
INBOX
Sorry meeting went long with Bill. So is covering 10 and my 11
18
DOJ-PROD-OOOOO 6 O
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-02-26
01:57:06 , Fr|
2016-02-26
01:57:14, Fri
2016-02-26
01:57:25, Fri
2016-02-26
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
Hi. Just left andy and the seif is closed. \U0001f621
And I'm reading the apple motion.
I wrote the following to andy: "Hey I'm sorry. It’s just wildly aggravating
how much churn has gone on this. Have a good night."\n\nAnd he just
wrote back: "Agree. Strongly."\n\nSo I guess it's all good.
I know. It shouldn't, but it's killing me too. I'm really angry but I'm trying
to calm down. _
It IS all good.
I sent you the email and DoJ's response.
This is what texted back: •
I saw. I LOATHE the man.
Weak. Not surprised though.
Damn.
I think it is disgusting. I'll have to hear how we ended up totally losing
on everything. I've been around long enough to not be surprised, but
just confirms we have no say over our own case. _
I know. I know. I'm sorry.
2016-02-26
01:58:00, Fri
INBOX
‘So 1 look forward to that conversation
2016-02-26
01:58:18, Fri
OUTBOX
Does he know I'm working this behind the scenes too?
2016-02-26 •
01:58:19, Fri
INBOX
To be clear, those both were from Jon to me
2016-02-26
01:58:40, Fri
INBOX
No. Unless you want me to tell him
2016-02-26
01:58:51, Fri
OUTBOX
Yeah, 1 think you should.
2016-02-26
01:58:51, Fri
INBOX
He knows we're good friends
2016-02-26
01:59:39, Fri,
OUTBOX
1 don't even have an argument for you. 1 mean, you know everything 1
do. And Andy did fight, but at some point, to what end?
2016-02-26
01:59:45, Fri
OUTBOX
1 don't know
2016-02-26
INBOX
01:59:48, Fri
\U0001f636\U0001f636\U0001f636\n\nHe knows you put a word in
for him with Andv after we talked.
19
DOJ-PROD-OOOOO 6 I
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-02-26
02:00:17, Fri
OUTBOX
I'm stuck between two men 1 hugely respect.
2016-02-26
02:00:51, Fri
INBOX
Picking your battles, with a view from the very top of the agency.
Because most big bureaucratic fights are never clear wins.
2016-02-26
02:01:18, Fri
OUTBOX
Yeah, I'd tell him. Because truly, I've done very little else the last couple
of days.
2016-02-26
02:01:29, Fri
INBOX
This isn't a huge loss. We'll get a good interview. And if it isn't, we'll
adjust.
2016-02-26
02:01:41, Fri
OUTBOX
And at the end of the day, it IS hard hill to die on to fight between 6 and
7.
2016-02-26
02:02:14, Fri
INBOX
And for the rest of the time we deal with DoJ, we'll hear about "how we
did it that time in 2016."
2016-02-26
02:02:36, Fri
2016-02-26
02:02:52, Fri
INBOX
Yes, hence Andy's 4 vs 7 argument
INBOX
Anyway. We BOTH need to move on for our sanity.
2016-02-26
02:03:06, Fri
OUTBOX
Yes, 1 was just about to say the same thing.
OUTBOX
Hey, help me tomorrow to remember to order business cards. I'll need
the link again...
2016-02-26
02:26:25, Fri
OUTBOX
Trying to let it go, but has Bill responded?
2016-02-26
02:28:06, Fri
INBOX
1 think Andy would tell him (or rather than not at all because he
knew you were relaying to me, right?
2016-02-26
02:28:14, Fri
INBOX
What's never happening again?
2016-02-26 OUTBOX
02:29:05, Fri
2016-02-26 INBOX
02:29:07, Fri
2016-02-26 OUTBOX
02:29:18, Fri __
2016-02-26 OUTBOX iSo, re my cards, should I wrote Counsel to the DD or 5pecial Counsel?
02:30:52, Fri _ j___
2016-02-26 INBOX Sorry, was on phone with . He is immensely relieved he doesn't
I specifically asked if I should tell you and he said yes.
Andy WILL travel...maybe not a whole day then, but a good chunk.. J
02:36:46, Fri _ have to choose between himself or .\U0001f612
2016-02-26 INBOX ; l don't like just Special Counsel
02:37:10, Fri_!_._
2016-02-26
INBOX
;Although wait, I'm not sure about that
02:37:31, Fri
2016-02-26
02:37:37, Fri
OUTBOX
Yeah well his is a cocksucker, he should still be stressed about that.
2016-02-26
02:37:51, Fri
!inbox
He is (
2016-02-26
02:38:07, Fri
INBOX
2016-02-26
02:38:39, Fri
OUTBOX
: Stressed that his is the face of the section
I also think I prefer just counsel. That's why I asked. But think about it.
20
DOJ-PROD-OOOOCI62
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-02-26
02:40:04, Fri
INBOX
i I will. Don't think either of those is quite right. What's your agreed upon
title?
2016-02-26
02:4 0:50, Fri
2016-02-26
11:05:09, Fri
2016-02-26
11:21:57, Fri
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
Special Counsel. But truly, I can put whatever I want on them
Mtg with
the d is 3-3:30, but I think there's a high chance that it will go over.
Normally I would just bail, but it's the d and an important legal issue.
And I get three hours of Laufman and n two consecutive
meetings this morning. Gosh, today's going to be great _
2016-02-26
11:26:05, Fri
2016-02-26
20:58:36, Fri
INBOX
INBOX
There won't be. Bill has MYE wrap at 230, just like he did for DD's
function. And if like the one for DD, for which I was late, I won't have
time.
..hope you didn't mind me
busting your balls in front of Trisha. You certainly didn't mind giving me
the finger in front of her. \U0001f609 _
2016-02-27
21:30:05, Sat
INBOX
2016-02-29
12:55:21, Mon
INBOX
I knowl I left it till the last second. Just spent an hour on conference
call with Jon and giving them a dump and discussing path forward.
\n\ nAnd hi. \U0001f636 _
So called JB on Sat night to complain about leaks. I need to talk to
him today...._
2016-02-29
12:56:25, Mon
OUTBOX
And how the hell does have Jb's cell phone number?
2016-02-29
12:57:55, Mon
2016-02-29
12:58:24, Mon
INBOX
That's the way Washington works. JB told Bill they've known each other
for a long time.
OUTBOX
Oh. 1 would run by his ofc now - he'd almost always there by now.
2016-02-29
13:11:36, Mon
INBOX
Ok getting coffee - no time this morning -1 will try on the way back.
2016-02-29
13:21:58, Mon
INBOX
Jim in morning brief with D
2016-02-29
13:28:51, Mon
OUTBOX
Then 1 would try him again right before 9 if you can.
2016-02-29
13:42:26, Mon
INBOX
Will try. Just shot him an email asking for 15
2016-02-29
13:42:44, Mon
OUTBOX
Talk in 2?
2016-02-29
13:43:04, Mon
INBOX
Also 1 have your notebook. Nope sorry headed into dad mtg.
2016-03-01
03:07:31, Tue
INBOX
Just spoke with Bill, he's emailing and JB to get together first
thing. 1 need to give you details.
2016-03-01
03:20:03, Tue
OUTBOX
Will try. Need to talk to then andy about
2016-03-01
03:20:16, Tue
OUTBOX
What details?
<
21
DOJ-PROD-OOOOCI63
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-03-01
03:23:04, Tue
INBOX
What 1 told Bill about you seeing jg
2016-03-01
03:23:29, Tue
OUTBOX
Ah. What'd he say?
2016-03-01
03:24:00, Tue
INBOX
And about me (actually us, again) seeing them months ago
2016-03-01
03:24:16, Tue
INBOX
He wanted to know if there were specifics rather than rumor and
innuendo
2016-03-01
03:24:43, Tue
INBOX
All this makes me weary,
2016-03-01
03:24:57, Tue
OUTBOX
No specifics, just interesting timing.
2016-03-01
03:25:15, Tue
OUTBOX
1 know, 1 know.
2016-03-01
03:25:32, Tue
INBOX
That's what we meant by specifics. Specifics about him meeting them.
2016-03-01
03:26:21, Tue
OUTBOX
Not following. It's not rumor, we/I saw them!
2016-03-01
03:28:05, Tue
INBOX
We're saying the same thing. 1 told him jg was close to them. He asked
if 1 had specifics. 1 said 1 had seen him with one a few months ago, and
that you had seen the three of them together last week.
2016-03-01
11:52:41, Tue
INBOX
'. \U0001f61e\n\nYou think wraps are generally going to go this
late, or is this just a busy time?\n\nAnd that reminds me, 1 had wanted
to ask you about your response to Andy's little dig on^J about
having all kinds of free time in the
2016-03-01
11:56:10, Tue
OUTBOX
We stayed behind to try to talk to andy about but then that
didn't even work.\n\nYeah, don’t think he totally meant it as a dig, but
of course it was.
2016-03-01
12:01:14, Tue
INBOX
That stinks. But at least it’s an outlier in staying late, \n\nl wasn't sure.
It had an edge.
2016-03-01
12:02:18, Tue
OUTBOX
Yeah, I'm not so sure it is. I'm getting more convinced that the last few
weeks of ease were the anomaly.:(
2016-03-01
12:12:44, Tue
INBOX
Yeah it sucks, no question about it. Hopefully Andy and everyone will
find a rhythm and it will get a *little* better.
2016-03-01
12:59:39, Tue
2016-03-01
13:01:46, Tue
INBOX
Hi. Bill going to brief Andy. knew not to mention yet, right?
INBOX
Also need to talk to you before you talk to Andy on topic
2016-03-01 OUTBOX
13:02:55, Tue
2016-03-01 INBOX
16:32:55, Tue
2016-03-01 INBOX
23:20:39, Tu e_
2016-03-02 INBOX
01:19:48, Wed
Yes, he will not mention.
Hey got summoned to Bills
Ces called wanting to know what if anything Baker had done and Beth's
22
DOJ-PROD-OOOOCI64
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-03-02
01:20:01, Wed
INBOX
He asked me who I'd vote for, guessed Kasich
2016-03-02
01:20:11, Wed
OUTBOX
Yes, they should.
2016-03-02
01:20:29, Wed
2016-03-02
01:20:39, Wed
OUTBOX
Seriously?! Would you not D?
INBOX
1 don't know. 1 suppose Hillary.
2016-03-02
01:20:46, Wed
INBOX
1 would D
2016-03-02
01:21:00, Wed
OUTBOX
He's doesn't think you're an R, does he?
2016-03-02
01:21:04, Wed
INBOX
VA's going to go to her anyway.
2016-03-02
01:21:17, Wed
INBOX
He thinks 1 wouldn't vote for her right now
2016-03-02
01:21:24, Wed
INBOX
He's knows I'm a conservative Dem
2016-03-02
01:21:45, Wed
OUTBOX
But now 1 wonder.
2016-03-02
12:34:34, Wed
INBOX
1 sent the email and my comments to Bill. Going to call him in 5 to
ensure he got it
2016-03-02
12:36:00, Wed
OUTBOX
Good, is too much of a pleaser - I'm concerned he won't see how
wrong her demand is.
2016-03-02
13:20:08, Wed
INBOX
Sorry. Thats aggravating. I'd probably cut him a little slack though. Bill
apparently fired up a little bit, not in a good way.
2016-03-02
13:23:49, Wed
OUTBOX
How do you mean not in a good way?
2016-03-02
13:24:20, Wed
INBOX
Can you talk or imsg?
2016-03-02
13:24:34, Wed
INBOX
Worrying by nature
2016-03-02
13:25:15, Wed
INBOX
It can wait, and of course I'll tell you later.
2016-03-02
13:35:54, Wed
OUTBOX
Sorry. Leaving now.
2016-03-02
14:07:59, Wed
INBOX
Np. Just try and keep everyone calm and measured up therr
2016-03-02
15:01:10, Wed
INBOX
Sorry no was in my mye morning brief
2016-03-03
01:31:55, Thu
INBOX
Nyt article out. Not
horrible.
2016-03-03
01:32:38, Thu
OUTBOX
Yeah, it seemed like much ado about nothing. Shall 1 send to andy?
2016-03-03
01:33:24, Thu
INBOX
As you wish. \U0001f636
2016-03-03
01:36:09, Thu
OUTBOX
Texted it. Though l expect Kortan already has.
23
DOJ-PROD-0000065
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-03-03
11:29:41, Thu
INBOX
We're hosting a conference all day in
Bonaparte -1 have to give the opening at 845 but have a lot of flexibility
in the morning after that.
2016-03-03
11:31:31, Thu
2016-03-03
11:35:41, Thu
OUTBOX
I'm not sure if I’m coming in but I’ll let
you know. If not, probably won't be free until after lunch.
INBOX
Oh, that's right. Np. Steinbach wants to meet his SCs and up from 2-3,
and I've got to talk to my DS counterpart whenever the conference
wraps up.
2016-03-04
02:10:50, Fri
OUTBOX
God trump is a loathsome human.
2016-03-04
02:11:26, Fri
INBOX
Yet he may win
2016-03-04
02:11:35, Fri
INBOX
Good for Hillary
2016-03-04
02:11:51, Fri
OUTBOX
It is.
2016-03-04
02:12:46, Fri
INBOX
Would he be a worse president than cruz?
2016-03-04
02:13:14, Fri
OUTBOX
Trump? Yes, 1 think so.
2016-03-04
02:13:37, Fri
INBOX
I'm not sure
2016-03-04
02:20:04, Fri
INBOX
Omg he's an idiot
2016-03-04
02:20:33, Fri
OUTBOX
He’s awful
2016-03-04
02:21:02, Fri
INBOX
America will get what the voting public deserves
2016-03-04
02:21:36, Fri
OUTBOX
That's what I'm afraid of.
2016-03-04
02:22:11, Fri
INBOX
Department of Environmental Protection? 1?!
2016-03-04
02:24:25, Fri
INBOX
God Hillary should win 100,000,000 - 0.
2016-03-04
02:35:16, Fri.
OUTBOX
1 know.
2016-03-04
02:26:19, Fri
INBOX
What was that weird shiny thing on his lip?
2016-03-04
02:27:58, Fri
OUTBOX
1 know. It was like a piece of food!. iays this keeps getting better
every minute.
2016-03-04
02:34:56, Fri
OUTBOX
Also did you hear him make a comment about the size of his d*ck
earlier? This man can not be president.
2016-03-04
02:37:06, Fri
INBOX
Yes 1 did. In relation to the size of his hands.\n\nAnd all the "Little
Marco" blah blah blah
2016-03-04
02:38:08, Fri
INBOX
And God, Detroit used to be SO beautiful and shining and elegant.
\U0001f61e Sigh.
2016-03-04
02:38:35, Fri
OUTBOX
I know. Detroit is really a beautiful city. Camden was too.
»
24
DOJ-PROD-OOOOO 66
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-03-04
02:43:17, Fri
INBOX
His flag is f*cked up
2016-03-04
02:43:53, Fri
OUTBOX
Yes it is.
2016-03-04
02:54:35, Fri
OUTBOX
Stupid Pck.
2016-03-04
02:54:35, Fri
INBOX
\U0001f620\U0001f620\U0001f620\U0001f620\U0001f620\U0001f62
0\U0001f620\U0001f620\U0001f620\U0001f620\U0001f620\U0001f6
20\U0001f620\U0001f620\U0001f620\U0001f620\U0001f620\U0001f
620\U0001f620\U0001f620
2016-03-04
02:55:04, Fri
OUTBOX
God we're the same.
2016-03-04
02:56:09, Fri
INBOX
Ok 1 may vote for Trump \n\n;)
2016-03-04
02:57:00, Fri
INBOX
"And look, I'M OLD"
2016-03-04
02:58:39, Fri
OUTBOX
What?!\n\nPoor Kasich. He's the only sensible man up there.
2016-03-04
02:59:53, Fri
INBOX
He was pretty much calling for death for Snowden. I'm a single issue
voter. ;)\n\nEspionage Machine Party
2016-03-04
03:00:23, Fri
INBOX
Exactly re Kasich. And he has ZERO appeal
2016-03-04
03:00:33, Fri
OUTBOX
Ah. Got it. Was re-reading the article so 1 stopped paying attention.
2016-03-04
03:01:08, Fri
OUTBOX
That's so sad. He's an adult who can be trusted. Why are we so
superficial.
2016-03-04
03:01:46, Fri
INBOX
What article? Steve’s?
2016-03-04
03:02:08, Fri
INBOX
We like spectacle and combat. Our monkey ancestors
2016-03-04
03:02:29, Fri
OUTBOX
1 can't accept that.
2016-03-04
03:04:50, Fri
INBOX
Why do you think we're so superficial?
2016-03-04
03:05:30, Fri
OUTBOX
1 think because we're largely undereducated?
2016-03-04
03:08:13, Fri
INBOX
But that proves my point. There's some basic instinct it appeals to.
2016-03-04
04:01:45, Fri
INBOX
So just understand you don't get a fair and balanced (hey, it's Fox's
night) viee
2016-03-04
04:01:52, Fri
INBOX
View
2016-03-07
03:09:32, Mon
OUTBOX
Okay, 1 guess I'm going to kill the light and try to sleep. Though right
now I'm reading the latest draft in the apple litigation.
2016-03-08
00:50:03, Tue
OUTBOX
Hey, andy has^^^m in the morning so if you're going to need
early answers you won't be able to get them. He won't be at morning
meeting either. Randy has the stick.
25
DOJ-PROD-OOOOCI67
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-03-08
00:51:51, Tue
INBOX
Waiting to hear back from Bill. I'm fine not having early answers - State
may not be, but that's their issue. 1 don't think we want to push the
issue thru Randy.
2016-03-08
11:02:55, Tue
OUTBOX
Hey ust told me about having to meet with Bill and Trisha this am.
Okay if 1 tell her we talked (that you called to get some insight about
what went sideways?)
2016-03-08
11:11:25, Tue
INBOX
Yes re fell her 1 called you after 1 saw the email from Steinbach
2016-03-08
11:11:48, Tue
OUTBOX
Yup, that's what 1 was going to do.
2016-03-08
11:13:23, Tue
INBOX
1 sent her what 1 sent Bill, can forward to you if you want, but she can
tell you as well. Talked to last night as well, he was again
changing it, and thought he would need to run up through NSD if we
wanted to make the chanee
2016-03-08
12:48:04, Tue
INBOX
Trisha apparently trying to grab Bill and Mike at 745. So 1 have no 9 with
Bill.
2016-03-08
13:03:29, Tue
OUTBOX
Yup, that's what said
2016-03-09
02:26:40, Wed
INBOX
Emailing
2016-03-09
15:44:03, Wed
INBOX
K. Lync me when you get to desk. I'll finish. Re oca and briefing
requirements
2016-03-09
23:03:25, Wed
OUTBOX
Yes. But need to try to fix a HUGE who f-up.
INBOX
Who or wfo?
26
DOJ-PROD*0000068
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-03-09
23:41:44, Wed
INBOX
Pulling in now will drop off in garage
2016-03-09
23:41:52, Wed
INBOX
Meet me in my office in 3?
2016-03-10
02:31:31, Thu
INBOX
Though I'm exhausted. Talked with for a while about half an hour
ago. He does give a shit, and he's not a bad atty.
2016-03-10
OUTBOX
Both are absolutely true.'
02:39:54, Thu
2016-03-12
20:58:35, Sat
OUTBOX
What the f is wrong with people?\n\nA Texas Candidate Pushes the
Boundary of the Far Right http://nyti.ms/lQTqBqj
2016-03-12
21:05:11, Sat
INBOX
That Texas article is depressing as hell. But answers how we could end
up with President trump
2016-03-12
OUTBOX
Wasn't it? Seriously, how are people so incredibly ignorant?
21:07:50, Sat
2016-03-12
21:12:46, Sat
INBOX
1 have no idea, but it depresses me. Same people who drive more when
they get extra daylight from daylight savings. I'm guessing.
2016-03-12
21:21:03, Sat
INBOX
\U0001f621\nTrump Clarifies, and It\u2019s Worse -
NYTimes.com\nhttp://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/03/12/opinion/trump-
clarifies-and-its-worse.html? r=0
2016-03-14
11:34:46, Mon
INBOX
1 don't know how you tell to check her email, but 1 cancelled the
900 due to Jones scheduling a career board for his special assistant.
\U0001f612
2016-03-14
11:53:08, Mon
OUTBOX
Don't listen to nprthis morning - is an uninformed
douche. \U0001f621\U0001f621\U0001f621
2016-03-14
11:53:28, Mon
INBOX
I'm in a bad mood. I'm really angry is
taking up three section Chiefs time to do interviews for his gs-15 Special
Assistant. A iob which is entirely unnecessary.
2016-03-14
11:53:43, Mon
INBOX
Yeah, 1 really don't like him. What did he say?
2016-03-14
11:54:39, Mon
OUTBOX
Totally unnecessary. He's awful.
2016-03-14
11:55:14, Mon
OUTBOX
I'll tell you later He sucks.
2016-03-14
11:58:38, Mon
INBOX
You can tell me about and we can get indignant together.
2016-03-14
12:03:11, Mon
INBOX
Also, if you can, please don't forget to ask Andy about his plans this
Friday. Fingers crossed...\U0001f636
2016-03-14
12:46:52, Mon
INBOX
Crank crank crank. Went back to my office to do stupid epas for job
ratings. Now back to Jones
2016-03-14
15:04:48, Mon
INBOX
The new career board process is awful...
2016-03-14
15:05:14, Mon
OUTBOX
1 can only imagine.
2016-03-14
15:06:52, Mon
INBOX
Geez no lie. Just looked at calendar. Your afternoon went to sh*t.
2016-03-14
15:09:54, Mon
INBOX
Going to talk to 1 will make sure to extricate myself by 11:30.
2016-03-14
INBOX
17:51:09, Mon
27
DOJ-PROD-0000069
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-03-14
OUTBOX
1 _ M
17:55:03, Mon
2016-03-15
15:10:46, Tue
OUTBOX
speaking on DT. Very effective speaker.
2016-03-15
15:34:43, Tue
INBOX
Yeah, he's great.! love Fantastic search stories with him from back
in the day. \u263a
2016-03-15
15:35:01, Tue
INBOX
He and his wife are the basis for the Jamie Fox movie The
Kingdom.
2016-03-15
15:35:28, Tue
OUTBOX
That's neat. Yeah, he was a phenomenal public speaker.
2016-03-15
15:37:21, Tue
INBOX
How long does your thing go?
INSOX
Noon?
2016-03-15
15:37:55, Tue
OUTBOX
Yes, though Andy is speaking at 11:45, but it looks like they're going to
run over.
2016-03-15
15:40:24, Tue
INBOX
\U0001f615\n\nYou still have something fairly early during lunch with
Trisha? 1 ask because 1 can't check because of course unet is still fed
up...
2016-03-15
15:41:06, Tue
OUTBOX
1 probably will wait to eat between 1 and 2 . Have a 12:45 with Trisha.
2016-03-15
15:44:00, Tue
INBOX
Boo. ;)\n\nl have my cd staff meeting...which Bill informed us may go
extra long today. \U0001f612
2016-03-15
16:09:16, Tue
INBOX
And scrubbed my business cards, no mystery dot. Betting they’ll do
another run for you.
2016-03-15
16:23:58, Tue
INBOX
Just ran into Told him he got rave reviews...he related
leaving his cell up near the podium while Andy spoke...
2016-03-15
16:24:53, Tue
INBOX
And no unet stinks
2016-03-15
16:26:47, Tue
OUTBOX
He did. Andy^did awesome with it too. "Either there's a backpack bomb
up here or someone is getting a phone call."
2016-03-15
16:32:39, Tue
INBOX
Stupid unet forcing me to do all kinds of work-arounds. How hard can
this be?
2016-03-15
16:33:36, Tue
INBOX
•
>aid he had some rejoinder back - something about not being able
to get in...he said he realized he left his phone up there 19 minutes
before it actually rang
2016-03-15
16:34:45, Tue
OUTBOX
W
2016-03-15
16:40:31, Tue
INBOX
Who is Greg Brower? He's getting his SES certificate with me on Thurs
morning.
2016-03-15
16:41:18, Tue
OUTBOX
He's the new Tom Bondy. Head of Lit Branch. Former US Attorney of
Nevada.
2016-03-15
16:41:46, Tue
INBOX
Damn. Impressive enough. Good guy?
2016-03-15
16:43:44, Tue
OUTBOX
Seems to be. Was also at (head of] EOUSA and GC at GPO 1 think?
2016-03-15
16:55:44, Tue
INBOX
Wow. And government printing office?
28
DOJ-PROD-0000070
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-03-15
19:04:54, Tue
OUTBOX
I'm in a call with andy and when I'm done then
grab food.
2016-03-16
04:11:51, Wed
OUTBOX
1 can not believe Donald Trump is likely to be an actual, serious
candidate for president.
2016-03-16
INBOX
09:49:34, Wed
|^\nhttp://mobile.nyti mes.com/2016/03/16/technology/apple-court-
filing-iphone-case.html
2016-03-16
11:06:13, Wed
INBOX
And already driving to get info to Bill.
2016-03-16
11:45:04, Wed
INBOX
Complaint delivered, with copy for and Andy.
2016-03-16
12:05:35, Wed
INBOX
I'll wait regardless. 830 with Jones then 910
mye. Should be done but 940 or so.
2016-03-16
19:44:56, Wed
INBOX
K. Finishing up call with hit me on lync or desk
2016-03-16
21:06:34, Wed
INBOX
Done?
2016-03-16
21:06:50, Wed
OUTBOX
Just waiting for baker, then done.
2016-03-16
21:11:39, Wed
INBOX
Our guy us talking...
2016-03-16
21:11:42, Wed
INBOX
Is
2016-03-16
21:25:55, Wed
OUTBOX
Rock on.
2016-03-16
21:26:45, Wed
INBOX
How'd your mtgs go? Still crushing the interagency policy process?
\u263a
2016-03-16
21:33:05, Wed
OUTBOX
Damn straight.;)
2016-03-16
21:34:11, Wed
OUTBOX
Headed to desk just to check email then will pop down on my way out.
2016-03-17
12:18:33, Thu
INBOX
Just sent you calendar invite. Other option is the 30 minutes after your
ET guidelines brief. (11-fsh, 1 think?)
2016-03-17
13:00:06, Thu
INBOX
And hi. Kind of wish you could have been there. \U0001f636\n\nRandy
and JB both came over afterwards to sat congrats. Jim said, 1 guess 1
assumed you had been (ses) for a while.":)
2016-03-17
13:09:42, Thu
OUTBOX
Wish 1 could have too.
2016-03-17
13:10:27, Thu
OUTBOX
My 4 30 just moved to 9 30 so now I'm scrambling. \U0001f612
2016-03-17
13:22:08, Thu
OUTBOX
Andy leaving at 2 today so afternoon hopefully more free.
2016-03-18
00:27:19, Fri
INBOX
I can wait...\n\nBill mentioned he came in late to the mtg
29
DO J-PROD-0000071
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-03-18
12:05:54, Fri
INBOX
And it frustrates me, because Bill; at his 7:15, brings up the whole
matter in front of his DADs. One who is acting for Dina. Who
immediately goes to John and tell him how Bill is stressed because all
the stuff is going on about a special prosecutor. Bill needs to learn to
not talk to everybody about this when he’s upset about it. And I
guarantee that agent, while discreet, is certainly going to tell at least a
few other
people.\U0001f621\U0001f621\U0001f62l\U0001f62l\U0001f62l\UO
30
DOJ-PROD-OOOOCI72
Srtzok-Pase Texts
2016-03-18
12:06:06, Fri
INBOX
I'm sending to the 8:30 with Jones so that 1 can meet with John.
2016-03-18
12:46:19, Fri
OUTBOX
Did he go so far as to talk about why we started talking special
prosecutor?!
2016-03-18
12:47:24, Fri
INBOX
Don't think so. In my office talking to Jon
2016-03-18
OUTBOX
16:32:08, Fri
2016-03-18
16:32:45, Fri
INBOX
K. I'm waiting on ...\U0001f612
2016-03-18
21:13:53, Fri
OUTBOX
If door is closed, probably okay to knock if his secretary is gone.
2016-03-18
21:14:36, Fri
INBOX
Ok. You sure? And if she is. I'll just hang...
2016-03-18
21:16:19, Fri
OUTBOX
She leaves at 530.1 just asked. Jim behind dosed doors with Trisha now,
so I'm waiting. \U0001f612
2016-03-18
21:18:08, Fri
INBOX
Is it going to be weird if 1 show up, given Trishas email to you last night?
2016-03-18
21:18:27, Fri
INBOX
And let me know when you go in. I'll wait 10 then walk up
2016-03-18
21:18:39, Fri
OUTBOX
Yes, but remember, you're here to back brief on touhy.
2016-03-18
21:19:02, Fri
INBOX
Totally got it
2016-03-18
21:19:16, Fri
OUTBOX
I'm going in now.
2016-03-18
21:21:16, Fri
OUTBOX
Come soon
2016-03-18
21:22:38, Fri
INBOX
30 sec out
2016-03-18
21:31:31, Fri
INBOX
Hit me before you go, obviously. And J*sus how embarrassing 1 can't
believe how out of breath i was. \U0001f628
2016-03-18
21:31:45, Fri
INBOX
1 mean that was weird....
2016-03-18
21:56:57, Fri
INBOX
Hey, do you know if you're close?
2016-03-18
21:57:39, Fri
OUTBOX
Walking to my ofc now
2016-03-18
21:57:59, Fri
OUTBOX
You didn't need to runl
2016-03-18
21:58:38, Fri
INBOX
You said come soon!\n\nl was mortified!
2016-03-18
21:59:01, Fri
OUTBOX
'
It wasn't that bad.
2016-03-18
21:59:14, Fri
OUTBOX
Soon, now now! Or immediately!
2016-03-18
21:59:59, Fri
INBOX
Ha. 1 AM responsive.
-
31
DOJ-PROD-0000073
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-03-18
21:59:59, Fri
INBOX
Yes it was.
2016-03-18
INBOX
22:00:40, Fri
s ,
2016-03-18
22:01:01, Fri
INBOX
That and i better up my aerobic activity....
2016-03-19
00:42:58, Sat
INBOX
Thinking about earlier, 1 regret not saying more to.you and Jim. 1 should
have said, 1 know Bill is out, but we talked last night. I'm out next week.
Since 1 have you both, here are my thoughts because 1 know the
message doesn't always make it cleanly to the top. Will do that next
time.
2016-03-19
00:44:35, Sat
INBOX
Of course 1 might have still been so out of breath that 1 sounded like an
asthmatic without his inhaler. \U0001f612
2016-03-19
01:07:44, Sat
OUTBOX
Yeah, would have been a totally reasonable approach. 1 didn't think of it
either.
2016-03-19
01:14:18, Sat
INBOX
Sigh. Missed opportunity. Good news is I think the right message got
through. Have it in hand for next time.
2016-03-19
02:22:25, Sat
OUTBOX
Sorry, have been on with Bill P for the last 45 or so. He hadn't received
any back brief from Mike, which 1 figured, so 1 emailed him to let him
know 1 was happv to chat with him on the dl.
2016-03-19
02:23:30, Sat
OUTBOX
1 do like him. He gets nuance. 1 wonder if he gets intimidated/nervous
around Andy, or the bluster of the guys, be he's much more normal just
discussing an issue back and forth.
2016-03-19
OUTBOX
I had intended
02:27:23, Sat
to talk to Bill this weekend or Monday and be in bed already, but when
if 1 was free now there was no way 1 could leave him to wonder like
that.
2016-03-19
02:31:35, Sat
INBOX
Re bill
2016-03-19
02:32:14, Sat
INBOX
1 think some of it is his personality. 1 think he's naturally sort of old
fashioned gentlemanly in a Midwestern sort of wav
2016-03-19
02:32:48, Sat
OUTBOX
He is. 1 think he was pretty offended by my back and forth with randy.
2016-03-19
02:33:33, Sat
INBOX
It's not intimidation. Which is why 1 get a little angry at doing the
imitation thing. He's not weak - to the extent he has a weakness, it's the
over thinking earnestness, maybe thinking it's a tad bit more thoughtful
than it is. But it is genuine without guile.
2016-03-19
02:33:55, Sat
INBOX
You told him? He should be.
2016-03-19
02:34:28, Sat
INBOX
He is paying the price for a number of aggressive but unthoughtful
decisions by
2016-03-19
02:34:36, Sat
OUTBOX
1 did. 1 gave him the same readout as you, full and complete.
2016-03-19
02:35:27, Sat
-...___
INBOX
I'm sorry 1 didn't tell you and Jim what I thought. Made the mistake of
thinking you knew what 1 knew and therefore didn't want to repeat.
Should have treated vou both as an ODDortunitv.
32
DOJ-PROD-0000074
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-03-19
02:35:51, Sat
INBOX
Good and thank you. Not that it's my place to thank you, but hopefully
you know what 1 mean.
2016-03-19
02:36:32, Sat
INBOX
So. Where does go next? Given Andy's preference, clearly
replaces Eric. And Is done?
2016-03-19
02:36:54, Sat
OUTBOX
Yes, 1 think so.:(
2016-03-19
02:37:41, Sat
OUTBOX
Stb? What's his background? Science - at alt?
2016-03-19
02:38:07, Sat
INBOX
1 don't think so.
2016-03-19
02:38:23, Sat
OUTBOX
Adic? 1 could see that
2016-03-19
02:38:53, Sat
INBOX
Who knows. Depends on Andy and Andy and D.
2016-03-19
02:39:02, Sat
INBOX
I'm worried about Andy's response to him.
2016-03-19
02:39:22, Sat
INBOX
And if they leave him in CD AD for four years I'm done. is kma after
me.
2016-03-19
02:39:39, Sat
INBOX
They won't, because that's too long.
2016-03-19
02:39:52, Sat
INBOX
But he'd do a better job than
2016-03-19
02:40:35, Sat
INBOX
1 actually think would be better than as Intel ead. But that's a
weird call about what that job needs.
2016-03-19
02:40:41, Sat
INBOX
is young too
2016-03-19
02:41:13, Sat
OUTBOX
1 know. I don't think andy meant to be mean. But you know I'll keep an
eye out, and will say something if 1 need to.
2016-03-19
02:41:47, Sat
OUTBOX
is good simply because he can bust heads. And division is in
desperate need of that.
2016-03-19
02:43:04, Sat
INBOX
You shouldn't, other than maybe the specific behavior. Don't think
you're going to change anyone's perception. It's just unfortunate,
because Andy is behaving towards him exactly as and JG and
everyone behaved towards Andv.
2016-03-19
02:43:17, Sat
INBOX
Yep re | . Thats not
2016-03-19
02:44:28, Sat
OUTBOX
1 know re Andy. But he is not naturally a mean person, not like or
someone, so 1 do think it is an anamoly. But like 1 said. I'll keep an eye
out.
2016-03-19
INBOX
Did you tell Bill you told me as well?
02:44:47, Sat
2016-03-19
02:44:55, Sat
OUTBOX
lldidnt.
2016-03-19
OUTBOX
Didn't want to get you "in trouble" for not reaching out, since 1 reached
02:45:33, Sat
out for him on my own.
2016-03-19
02:45:33, Sat
INBOX
Is mean?\n\nAnd yes re imsg. Promise 1 won't keep you long.
2016-03-19
02:45:47, Sat
OUTBOX
Yes, he is. He's a bully.
33
DOJ-PROD-0000075
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-03-19
OUTBOX
02:56:25, Sat
2016-03-19
OUTBOX
02:57:16, Sat
2016-03-19
07:14:54, Sat
INBOX
1 'm
WIDE awake thinking about work. Processing what the team told me
yesterday afternoon. 1 should have told you yesterday, i hadn't
processed the significance of it until now. 1 will need to call this
weekend.
2016-03-19
10:24:12, Sat
OUTBOX
So why the need for to be so decisive all of a sudden? You need
to tell so she can start pushing this while you're gone.
2016-03-19
10:26:33, Sat
OUTBOX
Does his decision include no we're not going to ask for a waiver?
2016-03-19
10:29:02, Sat
INBOX
I'm not sure about any of this. Because often muddles things
2016-03-19
15:52:18, Sat
INBOX
That's fine. I don’t know what, if anything, Bill will provide me over the
week. Jones will have nothing. 1 don't think you'll have the time or
desire to rehash next weekend what happened on the case over the
course of the week. I’ll go crazy without an ability to know what's going
on, so I'd appreciate it if you would keep me posted if there are case
updates /developments.
2016-03-19
16:01:18, Sat
OUTBOX
Yes, of course 1 will keep you updated re the things 1 have visibility into,
though will likely be in a better position to report more granular
case updates.
2016-03-19
INBOX
Thank you. 1 appreciate it, obviously. You know i, like you, go insane
16:25:31, Sat
being out of the loop. And 1 won't abuse it.
1
.
2016-03-20
20:15:00, Sun
OUTBOX
Did she know about the reporting?
2016-03-20
21:05:21, Sun
INBOX
@ / @Whatever. It's passed. Just perennially irritating. \n\nDid
call you?
2016-03-20
21:06:50, Sun
INBOX
Funny. She's stubborn that way. 1 could almost feel the couple of times 1
encouraged her to do so that she wasn't going to.
2016-03-20
21:38:37, Sun
OUTBOX
Yeah, 1 would have put a grand down saying she wouldn't.
2016-03-20
21:40:07, Sun
INBOX
Why? Not wanting to be reliant on you? Ego? Competition? \n\nl mean
it was funny, 1 could literally sense it.
2016-03-20
22:04:44, Sun
OUTBOX
No, probably not wanting to bother. 1 hope it's not anything else.
Though she will surely not like how involved I've been this week.
2016-03-20
22:12:08, Sun
INBOX
Well it was the right decision (your involvement). 1 told her you were
since Bill was out. She'll understand, at least, right?
2016-03-20
22:13:42, Sun
OUTBOX
I'd hope so.
2016-03-20
22:29:08, Sun
INBOX
@ / @an't be on vacation while on vacation...
34
DOJ-PROD-0000076
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-03-20
22:29:08, Sun
INBOX
@ / \n\ni'm so so
sorry. Hoping to call Bill tonight and therefore generate another
conversation that 1 c
2016-03-20
22:29:39, Sun
OUTBOX
Why do you have to call him?
2016-03-20
22:36:07, Sun
INBOX
\u0500\u03f5\u0402 a very bad idea. To tell him this isn't the same as
or
2016-03-20
22:36:07, Sun
INBOX
\u0500\u03f5\u0401A) to update him on what 1 just forwarded you. To
tell him the IG's
2016-03-20
22:36:13, Sun
INBOX
\u0500\u03f5\u0403Petraeus or whatever else gets thrown out there.
\nB) oh, God. My ca
2016-03-20
22:36:13, Sun
INBOX
\u0500\u03f5\u0404pacity for blech trumps yours a hundred times
over. \U0001f615
2016-03-20
22:36:17, Sun
INBOX
C) you'd think.
gill
OUTBOX
A) here's the thing re your ig point though: it isn't about accountability.
Can you talk for 30 seconds?
2016-03-20
23:44:00, Sun
OUTBOX
1
And Eric Smith just called me to tell me two executives ( and
had complained to him about me.! am so goddamn pissed
about It was not an easy conversation for him to have, and I'm
grateful that he did it. And now 1 want to curl up in a ball and die. Yet
again. it's Lisa out of her lane.
2016-03-20
23:53:16, Sun
OUTBOX
1 am so angry. And so upset.
2016-03-21
00:12:47, Mon
OUTBOX
Honestly, 1 should just step down. Why the fuck am 1 working my tail off
and missing my family just to have people criticize my involvement in
things?
2016-03-21
00:13:37, Mon
OUTBOX
And the worst part is that even if he agreed with me, would never
say anything to "Agent code" and all.
2016-03-21
00:25:45, Mon
INBOX
\U0001f615 What happened?
2016-03-21
00:26:31, Mon
INBOX
Who's criticizing anything? I'm not following
2016-03-21
00:26:44, Mon
OUTBOX
What do you mean what happened? I sent you four text messages. Did
you not get them?
2016-03-21
00:27:07, Mon
OUTBOX
This was the first text:\n\nAnd Eric Smith just called me to tell me two
executives ( and , had complained to him about me. 1 am
so goddamn pissed about It was not an easy conversation for
him to have, and I'm grateful that he did it. And now 1 want to curl up in
a ball and die. Yet again, it’s Lisa out of her lane.
2016-03-21
00:27:25, Mon
INBOX
No. None.
2016-03-21
00:27:58, Mon
OUTBOX
But you got the one about me saying 1 should just step down?
2016-03-21
'00:30:22, Mon
INBOX
@ 0/ @'m mid-dinner. I can step out right now, or can text freely a bit
later. \n\nThey're wrong. And ' being a jerk.
35
DOJ-PROD-0000077
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-03-21
00:30:22, Mon
INBOX
@ 0/ (5)\nl just got the one you sent, and the one about stepping down.
Not the one you just sent about Eric. That sucks. And it's
wrong and inaccurate. 1
2016-03-21
00:30:41, Mon
2016-03-21
00:31:08, Mon
INBOX
You need to talk talk to Andy tomorrow early if you can
INBOX
And don't you DARE step down. What in the F is jpset about?
2016-03-21
00:32:32, Mon
OUTBOX
1 asked a lot ("too many") pointed questions during Brekke's DDPI.
Again, when I'm on their side, everyone loves Lisa. But God forbid 1
disagree...
2016-03-21
00:33:55, Mon
OUTBOX
I'll be damned if 1 say anything to Andy. 1 am going to say something to
Let's see him say 1 overstepped to my face, when I've had his
back sooo many times.
2016-03-21
00:36:48, Mon
INBOX
1 think you should talk to Andy. Talk to , but Andy needs to know.
Ultimately he's the guy your working for.
2016-03-21
00:38:14, Mon
OUTBOX
1 will not have this conversation with him again. And as 1 said above
(maybe you didn't get it), And the worst part is that even if he agreed
with me, Andy would never say anything to "Agent code" and
all.
2016-03-21
00:45:32, Mon
INBOX
@ 8? @1 got that one. It's not so much about him saying anything to
(though he should -1 would). It's making sure he's aware and
supports it. After all,
2016-03-21
00:45:34, Mon
INBOX
@ 8? @ Andy is the one who asked you if you had it and told you to
brief rather than calling me or Jon up. So he needs to own the impact of
that and support yo
2016-03-21
00:45:34, Mon
INBOX
@ 8? @u. Or at a minimum understand how that plays out in the mind
of his subordinates.
2016-03-21
00:49:04, Mon
OUTBOX
If 1 talk to maybe I'll tell Andy the results of that conversation.
I'm not doing more. But 1 am taking this week and giving serious
thought to stepping down. 1 can save face, say it was too hard on my
family. I'm doing this job for two years fearful of speaking up.
2016-03-21
00:54:49, Mon
INBOX
@ / @Fine. And you have an easy way out, which would save face. But
you can't do that.\n\nDoing the job two years fearful of speaking up IS
an option, but there
2016-03-21
00:54:55, Mon
INBOX
@ / @ are many - better - other ones. Ta Ik to Randy, then talk to
Baker. Then talk to Andy. He wants you there because of who and how
vou are.
2016-03-21
00:55:27, Mon
INBOX
Trust yourself.
•2016-03-21
100:56:24, Mon
OUTBOX
1 don't have confidence that Andy has my back. He should, but 1 never
operate with full confidence that he does.
12016-03-21
00:58:46, Mon
OUTBOX
My god, 1 am so hurt and so angry.
2016-03-21
01:00:46, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-03-21
01:07:41, Mon
INBOX
\u0500\u03f9\u0601This is part of the job that sucks. Moderately
powerful men with li
36
DOJ-PROD-OOOOCI78
Srtzok Page Texts
INBOX
\u0500\u03f9\u0602mited ability. 1 promise everything will look better
in the morning
2016-03-21
01:08:47, Mon
INBOX
\u0500\u03f9\u0603. And I'm going to go find a Jake Sullivan quote 1
found when 1 was
2016-03-21
01:09:59, Mon
INBOX
\u0500\u03f9\u0604 prepping for him. \n\nHang in there. You're not
wrong. You deserve t
2016-03-21
01:10:04, Mon
INBOX
\u0500\u03f9\u0606e even more effective because of it. \U0001f636
2016-03-21
01:10:04, Mon
INBOX
\u0500\u03f9\u0605o be there. You can learn to negotiate all this sh*t
and you will b
2016-03-21
01:33:50, Mon
INBOX
Hi. Home from dinner. Off to find that Sullivan quote. Missed Bill, so I'm
just going to email him.
2016-03-21
03:08:51, Mon
OUTBOX
Where was outrage when 1 got the cyber PPD thrown out? F-
cking hypocrite.
2016-03-21
10:18:43, Mon
INBOX
@ P? @Damn. Wrote below last night and thought 1 sent:\n\n Ok. Hope
you can. I'm sorry about earlier. I'd be livid, and crushed. Good on Eric
for calling. I want
2016-03-21
10:18:46, Mon
INBOX
@ P? @ to hear if he had any solution.\n\nBut if there's one thing 1
would tell you, it's to trust yourself. You're excellent at your job, and
bright, and deserv
2016-03-21
11:44:53, Mon
INBOX
@ P? @e to be there. Don't you dare step down. 1 won't hear of it, and
wont let you do it.
2016-03-21
11:46:03, Mon
OUTBOX
Yeah, his solution was essentially roll back, know my place.
2016-03-21
11:46:49, Mon
OUTBOX
It's not your call. I'm talking to randy today, and jim. Maybe Andy. I'll
decide at the end of the week.
2016-03-21
11:51:06, Mon
INBOX
F roll back. \n\nLisa of course 1 know it's not my call. I just don't want
you making a hasty decision, particularly when you're angry and hurt.
2016-03-21
11:58:51, Mon
OUTBOX
I'm not. I'm giving it a week.
2016-03-21
22:38:44, Mon
OUTBOX
Hi. Was in one meeting after another starting at 12:30 and ending now.
Spoke to neither Andy nor Randy. Leaving hq now. Still hate this place.
2016-03-21
22:47:38, Mon
INBOX
And damn that's a full day...
.
2016-03-21
22:49:28, Mon
OUTBOX
To be clear, 1 had a meeting from 11-1145 as well, it just wasn't
sequential like the rest of them.
INBOX
You work far too hard and too effectively to have to put up with the
sh*t you're dealing with.
2016-03-21
22:59:01, Mon
OUTBOX
That is correct. And 1 STILL f-ing left later than 1 wanted to, doing work
for the FBI. Walking in the door now.
2016-03-21
23:03:07, Mon
INBOX
\u0500\u0320\u0401The Bu is lucky to have you. I'll never forget that.
\n\nDon't forget
2016-03-21
23:03:10, Mon
INBOX
\u0500\u0320\u0402 what you're doing is independent from these a-
holes and makes a re
2016-03-21
23:03:13, Mon
INBOX
\u0500\u0320\u0404\ufffd
37
DOJ-PROD-0000079
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-03-21
23:03:13, Mon
2016-03-21
23:15:25, Mon
2016-03-21
23:26:10, Mon
2016-03-21
23:26:15, Mon
2016-03-21
23:26:35 , Mon
2016-03-21
23 :47:39, Mon
2016-03-21
23:51:36, Mon
2016-03-21
23:52:19, M on
2016-03-21
2 3:54:41, Mon
2016-03-22
00:24:25, Tue
2016-03-22
00:24:27, Tue
2016-03-22
00:24:30, Tue
2016-03-22
00:37:38, Tue
2016-03-22
00:46:41, Tue
2016-03-22
00:46:44, Tue
2016-03-22
01:08:38, Tue
2016-03-22
01:08:43, Tue
2016-03-22
01:57:11, Tue
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
iOUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
2016-03-22 INBOX
01:59:57, Tue
2016-03-22 OUTBOX
02:00:16, Tue
\u0500\u0320\u0403al difference for the country. I mean that, in a
sappy big R way. _
Yeah, Jim said the same thing. He knows he can get me with sap.
\u0500\u0321\u0301He and I know we can get you with the truth of
how important what w _
\u0500\u0321\u0302e do is
\U0001f636\U0001f636\U0001f636\n\nReason 442 (actually, it would
bejn the top 5) | _
\u0500\u0321\u030^^H : - \U0001f636
JM clearly spoke to andy about it tonight -1 left it up to him whether to.
JM wants to talk tonight. ___
What did he think/say about it? Forgot he would have been in there as
well.
He wasn't. He was on A/L.
Oh. You talked to him about it? What did he think,
\u0500\u0322\u0301And hey, apparently I can't send email.
\U0001f621\n\nl wrote back about Andy
\u0500\u0322\u0302's, said that was good news, and asked you not to
parse it out and
\u0500\u0322\u0303spin unnecessarily negatively about it
He just called me. We had a very good, very clear conversation that I
am, generally speaking, not to change anything about the way l am
engaging on issues. __
@ " (5>Yay!!\n\nrm so happy. Thats what I hoped but things get weird.
\n\nl'm so so glad. You have to be hugely relieved. \n\nSo are you still
going to talk to Ra ndy_ _
@ " @? Andy C? Eric? And if so, what approach? I kind of think Randy is
the easiest, ju st straightforward. _
j\u0500\u0324\u0201And arghh. I'm frustrated I can't email out.
I\n\ni'm so ha ppy, and so _
\u0500\u0324\u0202 glad he reaffirmed everything you are. Makes me
like him more. \U0001f60a _
He is going to talk to Randy and Andy C. separately, then address the
pother EADs more broadly. (Apparently Steinbach has been inquiring
labout my role too). _
*Good. A nice stern cup of stfu would go a long way.
Yes, he was very clear that particularly in that small group, he values my
views as much as theirs (at a minimum), and that he fully
expects/demands that I speak freely. He apologized for not saying
something to Randy at the time, said he was so stunned he thought it
was a joke at first. We talked too about strategies for the bigger group,
[CTntiiilliKrir.ii^wiUkTOiiiiwiNiiiftTti
38
DOJ-PROD-OOOOO 8 O
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-03-22
02:01:08, Tue
OUTBOX
Yeah, 1 hope he is as clear and direct with them as he was with me.
There's always that risk, but at least 1 know where I stand.
2016-03-22
02:04:04, Tue
INBOX
@ {" @Wow. Sounds like a really good conversation. 1 wouldn't hold out
too much hope for a perfect resolution, but like you said, at least you
clearly know whe
2016-03-22
02:04:06, Tue
INBOX
@ {" @re you stand.
2016-03-22
02:04:38, Tue
INBOX
\u0500\u0326\u0201And I'm sorry I'm not there, \n\nl want to talk all
about this with y
2016-03-22
02:04:38, Tue
INBOX
\u0500\u0326\u0202ou.\U0001f615
2016-03-22
02:07:31, Tue
OUTBOX
Yeah, same here.
2016-03-23
00:46:04, Wed
INBOX
Yes. Still there...\n\nYou being all fired up on the call certainly didn't
improve matters...
2016-03-23
00:47:02, Wed
OUTBOX
Ha. Meanwhile 1 just feel like throttling DOJ...
2016-03-23
00:51:58, Wed
INBOX
Not to worry. I'm impressively, even stunningly, effective at redirection.
2016-03-23
01:51:47, Wed
INBOX
1 WAS TALKING WITH MOFFA! Sheesh. \U0001f60a
2016-03-23
22:50:26, Wed
INBOX
1 am getting aggravated at Laufman. If I ever get a data connection
back, you'll see why.
2016-03-23
23:37:43, Wed
INBOX
@ H! @m but whatever. It’s just that nagging q uestion of whether
Mike knows/appreciates who does and knows what.
2016-03-25
18:33:55, Fri
OUTBOX
K. Still in Andy's ofc, be down soon.
2016-03-25
18:35:08, Fri
INBOX
Bill wants to talk some more. 5 minutes. 1 can also meet you up there
2016-03-26
19:08:19, Sat
INBOX
sent me an article about an Israeli company an Israeli news outlet is
claiming is helping us. Meant to follow up with you on your note last
week. \n\nSigh. Just for a few extra hours in each day...\U0001f636
2016-03-26
OUTBOX
1 read it.
19:09:28, Sat
2016-03-26
OUTBOX
19:10:12, Sat
2016-03-26
19:12:43, Sat
OUTBOX
And "they" (DOJ, the hill, 1C) don't like when we ask them to justify their
"need to know."
2016-03-26
19:13:02, Sat
INBOX
Yeah well that doesn't exactly change my point...\U0001f615
2016-03-26
19:13:31, Sat
iNBOX
Did you see the Hayden article from The Hill that 1 sent? Jackass...
2016-03-26
19:14:04, Sat
OUTBOX
Yup. All these former intel guys just trying to make money. Forget when
they came from.
2016-03-26
INBOX
Oh he's all about foreign spying still. Just wants to be the simultaneous
19:14:51, Sat
champion of domestic privacy liberties..
39
DOJ-PROD-OOOOO 8 I
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-03-26
21:53:52, Sat
INBOX
Just talked to Moffa. He's solid. Andy needs to start grooming him to be
AD Intel one day....
2016-03-26
21:57:51, Sat
OUTBOX
K. Will tell him eventually.
HUH
INBOX
When are you going to talk to him? Are you?
2016-03-28
00:46:14, Mon
OUTBOX
Still waiting until Andy has spoken to them. And yes, 1 will. I have to.
2016-03-28
00:49:11, Mon
INBOX
The longer it goes, the harder it is for Andy to say anything. \n\nSorry.
2016-03-28
00:49:47, Mon
OUTBOX
1 know. But he' has to. I'll make him.\n\nRemind me convo re he and.
baker.
2016-03-28
00:50:10, Mon
INBOX
1 just want some time, let’s please hopefully fingers crossed try and
take advantage of these days Andy is away...
2016-03-28
00:50:39, Mon
INBOX
Ok. Of course 1 want to hear it, particularly in light of what Bill said
about Trisha.
2016-03-28
00:50:54, Mon
INBOX
Andy and Baker or Randy and Baker?
OUTBOX
Andy and baker.
2016-03-28
09:21:36, Mon
INBOX
Hi. Forgot I'm acting dad today. 7:15 with Bill. \U0001f61e
2016-03-28
10:01:24, Mon
OUTBOX
Yuck. That stinks. Where's now?
2016-03-28
INBOX
Who knows. Working on his United Platinum status?
10:32:11, Mon
2016-03-28
16:11:56, Mon
INBOX
Just got done with Bill \U0001f612
2016-03-28
23:20:01, Mon
INBOX
Talked to Brian Brooks got answers to Andy's Qs about whether we
could do anything forensicaily to accommodate DoJs questions at
meeting. Short answer no, 1 can fill you in tomorrow if you want more
detail or just let Bill brief it ud.
2016-03-28
23:29:49, Mon
OUTBOX
Of course 1 will want info directly. And good. We shouldn't be. can
just get over herself.
2016-03-28
23:34:32, Mon
INBOX
Yeah that was my feeling, too. Brian offered several times to ask again
and i told him that answer was perfectly fine, just needed to be able to
say we did an honest ask at an executive level. Besides, I got him to tell
me the whole story of the Apple thing.
2016-03-28
23:37:14, Mon
OUTBOX
Hey, 1 was just following directions to keep it quiet. Everyone and their
mother wants to know how we did it and who the third party is! Hope
he didn't tell you for former as that is likely classified by now...
40
DOJ-PROD-0000082
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-03-28
23:37:32, Mon
INBOX
Also, the more 1 thought about the meeting this morning and what
you're waiting on from it made me angry. 1 want - the team
needs - your thoughts and input. 1 get you work for and advise him, but
he's not going to relay to anyone, let alone me, your thoughts as the
meeting is going on. You’re smart and your a good attorney and what
you think makes a difference to more than just Andy. Anyway, 1 value
your input and opinion and I'm disappointed i didn't get it at the
mpptinp
2016-03-28
23:39:16, Mon
OUTBOX
Yup. And it just makes me that much more angry that apparently now
I'm supposed to add Bill and Trisha to the list. Whatever. Is what it is 1
guess.
2016-03-28
23:42:16, Mon
INBOX
Not Bill 1 don't think. 1 really think he was relying what he heard, not
what he saw.
2016-03-28
23:42:47, Mon
INBOX
And you know 1 defended you without reservation, and 1 believe he
trusts my judgment.
2016-03-28
23:50:18, Mon
INBOX
And I'm not commenting on Trisha because 1 simply don't know. I'm not
saying 1 think you do. \n\nAnd dammit 1 know super busy but 1
worry she has too much going on. I'm going to ask her to have someone
in OGC do the atty opinion process research along the lines of what you
suggested. I fear too much of what we want and need to ask is going to
be construed by DoJ as "opinion." 1 don't want to ask about each of the
1500, but 1 do want to say, who gave you guidance about what
constituted a record? Who did you ask or rely on to make a decision?
Who and under what circumstances would you seek guidance from
State? All "opinion," right?
2016-03-28
23:57:53, Mon
INBOX
Also - and you have to reply to each of these (this and above), dammit,
don't skimp responses - where did Mike have to go? He left the last
brief to the D 45 minutes early as well. Whatever. \n\nWhat points did
you make to Andy in the meeting? 1 assume you'd relay to me at some
point as you did the final one but 1 am curious as to your thoughts along
the wav...
2016-03-29
00:05:13, Tue
INBOX
Finally, what is Andy/your understanding of what happens next after
the meeting today? That we charge ahead with the two scheduled
interviews provided doj telis Beth we aren't done and intend to
interview about sort?
2016-03-29
00:07:27, Tue
OUTBOX
1 do not agree that all are opinion. Opinion is about the attorneys
IMPRESSIONS, strength of the case, etc. Understanding what criteria
they used to determine whether something was work-related, and
whether someone applied those criteria re a particular email, is not
opinion. I'll do some research. And yes, is much, much too busy.
2016-03-29
00:08:06, Tue
OUTBOX
To brief the D. He had a CT Homeland session with POTUS.
41
DOJ-PROD-0000083
Srtzok-Page Texts
OUTBOX
B) yeah, I wanted to push on that, since uh, they all already know each
other George, but again, don't know my place.
OUTBOX
C) You know I'll look at whatever whenever you want.
2016-03-29 INBOX
00:24:32, Tue
A) sounds right. How much you want to bet I’ll be pulling teeth cone
Thursday?\nB) I know I can’t speak for Mike or Trisha, but as far as
everyone else in the room, on this case, it’s your place.
2016-03-29 | OUTBOX
00:26:08, Tue I
2016-03-29
00:26:54, Tue
2016-03-29
00:29:02, Tue
OUTBOX
INBOX
So I would like to suggest the following to andy, but it depends on how
important it really is to you: I really think should be present for all
future calls with D counsel. Enough that I'd be willing to tell Andy, hey,
this is a ’’look George, now I'm coming to you with an ask. We need a
person in that room to ensure a trust - filled relationship moving
forward. Be it’s starting to deteriorate." Or whatever.
A) Then you'd better tell them first thing tomorrow morning. By
email An
I don't think we're there yet, re having on all calls. Maybe if they
keep up these asinine proffers. But if they agree to get us interviews,
then I think we can let them have their attorney discussions. Let's see
2016-03-29
00:30:10, Tue
OUTBOX
Okay.
42
DOJ-PROD-0000084
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-03-29
00:30:50, Tue
OUTBOX
No more proffers. Period. God, I need to let this go. 1 can actually feel
my blood pressure rising.
2016-03-29
00:32:42, Tue
OUTBOX
And btw, it's all well and good that you like but 1 think he's an
arrogant *ssho!e. agrees, which makes it dispositive for me. 1 get
he's the best you've got on that team, and maybe he's in fact good, but
that doesn't change my fundamental read on him.
2016-03-29
00:33:48, Tue
OUTBOX
And 1 swear that it has nothing to do with our exchange at
the end. 1 actually thought that was quite reasonable.
2016-03-29
INBOX
A) me either. Let's see how this week goes. And I'll send something via
00:35:52, Tue
email tomorrow. \n^Bl^EjBKySklilS&StiyKMSiC3Bi
iPd|IMPWWi^ \nD) he may be an asshole. I like some assholes.
But he has experience and talks sense. If it wasn't your exchange at the
end. what was it?
2016-03-29
00:36:55, Tue
OUTBOX
I can't put my finger on it. His demeanor the whole time. I don't think
he is used to or likes to be disagreed with.
2016-03-29
00:37:12, Tue
UNBOX
And I GUARANTEE they will proffer more with Beth! Nothing was said
today that they wouldnt, in fact, my take away was they were pretty
clear they intended to!
2016-03-29
00:38:35, Tue
OUTBOX
No more proffers! We made clear that we needed an exchange with the
witnesses. It doesn't matter what she proffers.
2016-03-29
00:39:30, Tue
OUTBOX
And what is this 1 like some as shoes bullshit. Name me one. Not
someone funny snarky and can be a d*ck. 1 mean an arrogant asshole.
2016-03-29
00:39:56, Tue
OUTBOX
Yes, 1 just wanted to make sure you understood it was not about that in
any way.
2016-03-29
00:40:10, Tue
INBOX
They will want to do both. You HEARD them say they wanted to follow
up the proffer with her. Do you think Andy/Jim have the same hard no
proffer line/understanding?
2016-03-29
00:40:38, Tue
INBOX
apparently.
2016-03-29
00:41:03, Tue
OUTBOX
I'll ask, but probably no. 1 don’t think they care if they continue, so long
as we get in front of the witnesses.
2016-03-29
00:41:17, Tue
OUTBOX
No, you make excuses for people you like. Name me one.
2016-03-29
00:42:00, Tue
OUTBOX
1 don't actually think you do like assholes. We're too similar, care too
much about fairness and equity and kindness.
2016-03-29
00:42:19, Tue
INBOX
1 like 1 can see him being an asshole. And you and Doth think
so. Ergo, he's an asshole, who 1 like.
2016-03-29
00:42:35, Tue
OUTBOX
NAME ME ONE.
2016-03-29
00:43:02, Tue
INBOX
He has said a number of things to me in confidence which make me
believe he believes strongly in all three. So then he's not an asshole,
right?
2016-03-29
00:44:42, Tue
INBOX
In that case, you're right. 1 don't like assholes. \n\nThere. That was easy
enough.\U0001f609
43
DOJ-PROD-0000085
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-03-29
00:44:46, Tue
OUTBOX
Perhaps not, but he comes off as one. This is my first ever meeting with
him, and he came off as one. has met with him many many more
times, and she also regards him as one. And I'm sorry, I probably have
no better skill than reading people on first blush. I will always trust my
gut.___ ..
2016-03-29
00:45:17, Tue
INBOX
You read me wrong!
OUTBOX
2016-03-29 OUTBOX
00:45:53, Tue
>3-29 OUTBOX
22, Tue_
)3-29 | INBOX
34, Tue i
2016-03-29 ; IN BOX
00:50:02, Tue
2016-03-29 OUTBOX
00:50:56, Tue
INBOX
OUTBOX
2016-03-29 OUTBOX
00:55:05, Tue_
2016-03-29 INBOX
00:57:00, Tue
OUTBOX
Pm
2016-03-29
01:15:24, Tue
2016-03-29
02:3 7:14, Tue
2016-03-29
02:41:16, Tu e
2016-03-29
02:41:38, Tue
2016-03-29
02:41:43, Tue
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
You're making me angry. Either tell me I'm right and you were talking
crap or point out another asshole you like.
[No, not when it comes to someone's fundamental nature I didn't.
And no. I guess I don't like assholes. And I don’t think he's one.
I suppose we can agree to disagree re him. You obviously know him
better, I trust mv gut.
Can someone who
believes in eq uity and fairness be an asshole?_
Yes, of course! Someone is weak, insecure, threatened, whatever, and
act like an asshole as a defense mechanism. I'm just telling you,
everything about him, from jump, read that way to me. Even his
posture was agressive, like he couldn't believe he had to justify himself
aeain.
You did. And they will.
Well 1 like him, as far as I can tell. I'm not going to argue any more
whether or not he's an asshole.
Deal.
God. You KNOW I would....\U0001f636\U0001f636\U0001f636\n\nJust
emailed to ask what the plan and timing was re Beth.
Sorry was on phone with
As expected, couldn't hear Andy or Jim and wasn't clear that we
felt we mus t interv iew on sort and get on laptops. . __
And whatever discussion he had with this evening that wasn't
conv eyed. \ U0Q01f612 ___
5o I did.
44
DOJ-PROD-OOOOO86
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-03-29 IOUTBOX Well he should be able to call anyone else in that room and get that
02:41:46, Tue
message.
2016-03-29
02:42:06, Tue
INBOX
We both agree we need a united FBI-DOJ decision and position before
he calls Beth.
2016-03-29
02:42:28, Tue
inb’ox
I'm telling you, DoJ is miraculous about hearing what they want to hear.
2016-03-29
02:42:42, Tue
OUTBOX
No, they're just better than we are.
2016-03-29
02:43:14, Tue
INBOX
Ok. I'll tell you the worst news. Per atty proffer, Combetta says he used
BleachBit (a wiping program) when he deleted the psts from the
laptops.
2016-03-29
02:43:37, Tue
INBOX
\U0001f621\n\nNo one on the team knows that yet so you have to
wait to tell Andy.
2016-03-29 •
02:43:40, Tue
OUTBOX
The ones m and s used?
2016-03-29
02:44:17, Tue
OUTBOX
Still have to get them to confirm that. Doesn't change anything. You
would never just take some attys word for it.
2016-03-29
02:44:17, Tue
INBOX
Doesn't mean they're not somewhere else, but if true, and done
properly, makes this much harder.
2016-03-29
02:49:01, Tue
INBOX
Apr 18 I'm in nz...although 1 wonder if I should cancel with the case
where it is....
2016-03-29
02:49:50, Tue
OUTBOX
You should go. It’s important to meet these folks too. You will someday
have your other job back.
2016-03-29
09:04:43, Tue
OUTBOX
Aargh. and now 1 can't stop thinking about
your stupid case. The whole thing really makes me angry. \U0001f621
2016-03-29
INBOX
11:15:08, Tue
Trisha scheduled a meeting from noon
until 1. \U0001f612
2016-03-29
11:19:24, Tue
INBOX
Grassley letter about reporting we had people sign NDAs. Still. Not.
Done.
2016-03-29
11:46:00, Tue
INBOX
So. Changing topics so I stop wallowing in regret. Why is so low?
Trisha? Or everything?
2016-03-29
11:54:30, Tue
OUTBOX
Yeah, mostly Trisha and working way way too hard and not feeling like
Trisha is satisfied with anything is doing.
2016-03-29
11:55:22, Tue
OUTBOX
But you can't say anything to her!
2016-03-29
11:56:28, Tue
INBOX
1 won't. But 1 can be sweet, and appreciative
2016-03-29
11:56:49, Tue
OUTBOX
Yes, that would be good.
2016-03-29
11:57:01, Tue
INBOX
) and what is Tricia doing? the only competent person she has...
2016-03-29
11:58:36, Tue
OUTBOX
I know. I'm sure she doesn't know she's doing it and would be appalled.
I've been talking to every day about needing to say something to
Trisha. Or to talk to Jim about getting advice about how to address her
concerns. It's bad enough that she's been thinking about going back to
the line..._
45
DOJ-PROD-OOOOCI87
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-03-29
12:05:42, Tue
INBOX
And Jesus I'm late. Just now entering dc...
2016-03-29
12:08:30, Tue
INBOX
definitely needs to say something. That's no good having to work
that way, feeling that way.
2016-03-29
12:57:50, Tue
INBOX
Yay. I'm ready when you are. Bill is stopping by my office at 9:45,
something from upstairs this morning
2016-03-29
15:46:43, Tue
INBOX
Hey Trisha pushed the noon meeting. Call or stop by if you can before
lunch re email drafting.
2016-03-29
23:30:56, Tue
INBOX
Also said he would send the draft email on to Andy tonight. Don't
know why, but if you talk to him, want you to give me some credit in
the drafting of that thing. Doesn't make a big difference I guess.
\n\nAlso, Tricia email to apologize for changing yesterday to Monday.
She said she had convinced herself that today was already Wednesday.
I told her not to worry about it, that some weeks were like that, and
that it was probably better to put the day of the week in there anyway.
2016-03-29 OUTBOX 1 will. Was going to say pete md I drafted it so it should be good to
23:37:02, Tue go. \n\nPoor Trisha. That's rough.
2016-03-30 INBOX Seen talking to about you. I will show
01:04:2 4, Wed __yo u to m orrow. _
2016-03-30 OUTBOX Also, andy responded,
01:04:58 , Wed__ said he wo uld read email ton ight. _ _
2016-03-30 OUTBOX And more info re
01:08:21, Wed _ • ________
2016-03-30 INBOX
01:11:51, Wed We emailed. I want to show you tomorrow. Any chance
in hell you let me wait?
2016-03-30
01:17:14, Wed
INBOX
Ok. Are you going to trust me to believe'you'd feel the same way, roles
reversed?
2016-03-30
01:17:34, Wed
INBOX
And our cone of silence/circle of trust?
2016-03-30
01:22:03, Wed
OUTBOX
1 don't know what the first question means, but yes, of course to the
second question.\n\nPm not going to like this, am I? \U0001f615
2016-03-30
01:23:20, Wed '
INBOX
You're going to be fine once you read it a second time and understand
he knows nothing about you and lumps you into the HQ good idea fairy
collective.
2016-03-30
01:32:28, Wed
OUTBOX
I'm not sure how I can be a "former prosecutor" and have never
defended my position before a judge, but whatever, 1 don't give a shit.
Really, the person who should be most offended is She's done
nothing but as reasonable questions of them, him in particular, and
instead been cross-examined for having the temerity to question "the
most aggressive prosecutor agents have ever seen." But yup, you're
right. Not arrogant or an asshole.
2016-03-30
01:36:18, Wed
iNBOX
Sigh. How is he to know you from Adam? Compared to the and
other people he's encountered along the way?
46
DOJ-PROD-OOOOO 88
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-03-30
01:36:52, Wed
INBOX
You both react so strongly because there is (good, positive) similarity
between you.
2016-03-30
01:37:10, Wed
INBOX
I'm going to once get you to understand your first impression was
incorrect.
2016-03-30
01:38:45, Wed
INBOX
And stop with the don't give a shit, of course you do. But understand
he's judging improperly based on ignorance. And be strong enough in
your own skin and character to know he's wrong about you. Because of
his insecurities and oreiudgments.
2016-03-30
01:38:51, Wed
OUTBOX
How about he just explain the intricacies to the group of people at the
table who inquired of him in the first place? \n\nOn this guy? Don't
waste vour f-cking breath.
2016-03-30
01:40:22, Wed
OUTBOX
1 know he's wrong about me. 1 don't need his validation to know I'm
good at what 1 do. I’m not interested in engaging in a dick measuring
contest, thanks.
2016-03-30
01:40:46, Wed
OUTBOX
Yes, poor He knows all the answers. If only everyone would just
do as he said.
2016-03-30
01:41:11, Wed
INBOX
Please - if you got summoned from Trenton to appear before the US
Atty or the new Head of OCRS, you'd feel the same contempt. "The
suits at main {/front office) have never done it, have no idea what it
really takes." It's the same for him.
2016-03-30
01:43:37, Wed
OUTBOX
But you've said I've done it. Apparently your word doesn't carry much
weight either. \n\nAnd yes, you have the luxury, like all prosecutors, of
being myopic about everything about the case in front of you. We have
an institution to protect. Go fuck yourself,
2016-03-30
01:48:32, Wed
OUTBOX
And frankly, it shows how much weight he gives your opinion too. She’s
competent and has character and knows what she's talking about gets
met with I can explain to her the intricacies of privileges she has never
actually litieated. Quite the charmer.
2016-03-30
01:49:24, Wed
INBOX
Stop!\nA) you want his validation, because if he's half of what he says,
he's a good prosecutor. 1 want his validation.\nA) 1) he doesn't know
you\nB) put yourself in his shoes. He's an AUSA in Richmond. He's not
the AAG, or DAAG, even though he's wildly more qualified. That gives
rise to a complicated mix of contempt and envy and impatience and
disrespect. \nC) he's had to fight harder than he should for justice
(sound familiar?). That breeds distrust of authority. \nD) you're
welcome re my defense. Even though he isn't willing to drop decades of
experience for an acquaintance he's had for 6 months, 1 hope I'm and
trust it counts for something.
2016-03-30
01:51:14, Wed
INBOX
And dammit maybe people's opinions aren't perfect but are shaped by
their insecurities. Where does your expectation of perfect people come
from? Good people can be limited by their flaws. \n\nAnd their flawed
opinion of you doesn't make it true (about you).
47
DOJ-PROD-0000089
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-03-30
02:00:38, Wed
OUTBOX
1 have zero confidence at this time that he is a good prosecutor. Lots of
inflated ego blowhards actually think they are, doesn't make it so. Pony
up a comprehensive memo on work product, teach us all what we don't
know, and I'd be happy to change my opinion.\n\nYou want everyone's
validation, \n\nl do appreciate your defense of me. 1 should have
thanked you earlier. Thank you.\n\n! do not believe that 1 am perfect,
nor do 1 expect others to be - that's entirely unfair.
2016-03-30
02:02:48, Wed
INBOX
A) he convicted MacDonald. 1 don't know the rest of his trial record but
1 know he has a great reputation \nB) 1 do. It's a fault of mine. I'm
working on it. \nC) always. \U0001f636
2016-03-30
02:03:14, Wed
INBOX
D) you misunderstand me. I'm saying HE’S imperfect
2016-03-30
02:03:24, Wed
OUTBOX
1 haven't seen a whole lot of "doing" from him. But I've certainly heard
a whole lot of talk. He's litigated it 7000 times, should be no problem to
explain the law then. Hell, he can pull it out of the 7000 filings he's had
to make on the toDic.
2016-03-30
02:03:51, Wed
OUTBOX
D) I'm not looking for perfect from anyone. What I'm looking is
humility.
2016-03-30
02:04:14, Wed
INBOX
D) consequently his beliefs and impulses and reactions (to you, in this
specific instance) are fkawed.
2016-03-30
02:04:32, Wed
OUTBOX
A) And that's legit. And from everything I know, a tough case. So kudos
to him. Doesn't change the rest of it.
2016-03-30
02:05:31, Wed
INBOX
A) bullshit of course it does. There is work behind that success. And
unlike the ooseurs, actually did the lift.
2016-03-30
02:06:15, Wed
OUTBOX
1 know they are. 1 do not take the comments of someone who has
known me for a grand total of one hour to heart. I'm a lot more
confident than that. You don't have to believe me, but I'm not looking
for his validation. I'd simply take not being prejudiced and just a
*smidee* less arrogance.
2016-03-30
02:06:15, Wed
INBOX
Who amongst us is humble? Andy? You? Me? Let's be brutally honest.
2016-03-30
02:06:33, Wed
OUTBOX
A) 1 believe that! 1 meant that that was impressive!
>
2016-03-30
02:06:59, Wed
INBOX
And I'm telling you it's wrong to read it as arrogance.
2016-03-30
02:07:11, Wed
OUTBOX
Oh stop with the philosophical discussion. No. But do we make a point
of rubbing everyone's nose in it?
2016-03-30
02:07:26, Wed
OUTBOX
Then me, and Andy are ail wrong. So be it.
2016-03-30
02:07:30, Wed
INBOX
I'd say - reduced to its core - it's inferiority and contempt and doubt.
2016-03-30
02:09:11, Wed
INBOX
Jesus. You're not all wrong. His assumption is you are Giuliano and
and Giacaione. Lisa Monaco. Same-same. Why should he
trust this is any different.\n\n\nWhy are you responding so damn
hard?!?!?
2016-03-30
02:09:39, Wed
OUTBOX
Which 1 dislike even more. It's the very trait 1 most loathe. Instead of a
modicum of humility, self-awareness, men in particular self-aggrandize
to make up for their own inferiorit’
48
DOJ-PROD-0000090
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-03-30
02:10:26, Wed
INBOX
And same question you're not arrogant? Andy's not? I'm not? The
Director?\n\nThe only person 1 can honestly say no to is
2016-03-30
02:12:33, Wed
OUTBOX
Am 1 confident jn my abilities? Yes. Do 1 have to cut people down or rub
someone's nose in it to prove it to them, myself, or to feel good about
myself? No, 1 do not.
2016-03-30
02:12:47, Wed
INBOX
1 don’t think he's self-aggrandizing. 1 think he's earned his chops and is
engaging in behavior to minimize the devastating past impact of
politically motivated assholes torpedoing justice for their own
advancement. There's a difference.
2016-03-30
02:14:17, Wed
INBOX
He didn't cut you down! He didn’t say anything until prompted by me.
And his (misinformed - wrong in this instance but usually right) opinion
was informed by repetitive past experience.
2016-03-30
02:14:34, Wed
OUTBOX
So show me the fight for justice in this case. Not just the sweet nothings
he whispers in your ear alone, but the truth to power that he's speaking
every day.
2016-03-30
02:16:04, Wed
INBOX
After he's been told by George and to :hat their job is to get
process? That they are to be seen but not heard, like children? Why on
earth would he be cynical?
2016-03-30 ■
02:18:30, Wed
INBOX
And the fact that you don't need to cut people down or run their nose
in it doesn't diminish my point. Most people are flawed. See past their
problems - those problems are theirs, not yours - to let you see the
good and noble in them.
2016-03-30
02:26:07, Wed
INBOX
1 guess I'd say assume good intent. Whatever the pitfalls, assume good
intent.
2016-03-30
12:17:28, Wed
INBOX
Hi. 830 with Jones cancelled
2016-03-30
19:33:07, Wed
INBOX
Yep. But 1 don't know her schedule. She was talking desk search policy
change with Trisha at 3 then calling Fort now.
2016-03-30
22:12:43, Wed
INBOX
Need to talk later just got pulled into briefing tomorrow with ces,
toscas, briefing chief of crim div on
internal.
2016-03-31
00:07:09, Thu
OUTBOX
Hey, was thinking, don't you think DD should get a brief on that case for
tomorrow before doj does? Or at least at about the same time? Maybe
mention to bill?
2016-03-31
00:10:35, Thu
INBOX
Briefed Bill, he intended to tell Mike to brief Andy. Gave him enough
copies.
2016-03-31
OUTBOX
1 get that, but maybe an actual brief since that's what doj is getting and
00:11:39, Thu
I don't think you'd want your DD not to know everything they do right?
INBOX
Sorry called.
INBOX
Sounds smart to me but Bill/Mike need to raise it. And truly it's not that
big a deal.
2016-03-31
00:27 :52, Thu
2016-03-31
00:28:52, Thu
49
DOJ-PROD-OOOOCI91
Srtzok-Page Texts
2016-03-31
00:59:57, Thu
INBOX
Here's the thing re case brief -1 don't know how to stress importance
without Jones deciding to invite himself. \n\nAnd truly, 1 think Bill will
convey enough detail. And if Andy/Mike want more, they can ask.
\n\nlnterestingly, we'd brief internals somewhat regularly to EAD.
Haven't with Mike. Also, he's sat down for big briefs with 1 and 3 (not
sure about 2). Not us. Maybe he figures he'll hear about them if he
needs to. 1 may also suggest to Bill that he my want to get a section
significant case briefing.
2016-03-31
15:43:12, Thu
INBOX
Talked with Bill and Trisha and Will tell you on the way to lunch
- call me when you're clear.
2016-03-31
16:18:28, Thu
INBOX
Thanks for stepping out to make the call/ heads up about lunch, I
appreciate it. :)\n\nl am grumbly Bill is not going. Jim wasn't tracking on
all the various sources of ambiguity in the reporting. \U0001f612
2016-03-31
16:20:52, Thu
INBOX
And 1 am grumbly about Trisha. Will explain.
50
DOJ-PROD-0000092
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2016-04-01
14:38:39, Fri
INBOX
Just read your last lync - that's REALLY frustrating. \n\nBecause it's
ok for Mike and Randy to have multiple people like^ff and
|f, but because Andy is HIGHER, he needs LESS. \n\nMakes no
sense whatsoever.
2016-04-01
14:47:51, Fri
OUTBOX
Not just less, but no disagreement.
2016-04-01
21:05:54, Fri
OUTBOX
Calling George now. I'm sure this is in your interest
2016-04-01
21:07:21, Fri
INBOX
1 spoke with and got an update about where they are if you
want it (nowhere, though they have spoken then written to prao)
2016-04-01
21:07:50, Fri
OUTBOX
Talk to^f yet?
2016-04-01
21:08:16, Fri
INBOX
No decision on where or how to tell^H, other than she will be
called next week . No decision on what if anything to litigate.
2016-04-01
21:08:37, Fri
INBOX
No (that he could produce to me) analysis of fact vs opinion
product
2016-04-01
21:10:06, Fri
INBOX
f|[ told the working level today she thought the Sat interview
would only be State time....
2016-04-01
21:16:03, Fri
OUTBOX
Steinbach walked in. Calling George now
2016-04-01
21:16:31, Fri
INBOX
Sigh. Ok. Of course I'm waiting to hear all about it.
2016-04-01
21:17:29, Fri
OUTBOX
Oh christ. Doesn't seem like it is about the case. \U0001f612
2016-04-01
23:20:46, Fri
INBOX
Just got done talking with Bill
2016-04-01
23:21:45, Fri
INBOX
Went in when 1 got back, gave him the dump from you. \n\nl'm
sorry about the disappearing. \U0001f636
2016-04-01
23:24:20, Fri
OUTBOX
No problem. Hope you told him I'd be happy to share directly, just
totally confused by the (non)rules going on in this case.
2016-04-01
23:26:30, Fri
INBOX
Yes!\u263a
2016-04-01
23:58:52, Fri
INBOX
Yay. 1 told you Rich Quinn called, they're getting a ton of questions
about State saying they stopped investigation at FBI request...
2016-04-01
23:59:51, Fri
OUTBOX
Really. No, you didn't mention.
2016-04-02
00:00:36, Sat
INBOX
Standby will email article
1
DOJ-PROD-0000093
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
2016-04-02
01:19:29, Sat
2016-04-02
01:20:30, Sat
2016-04-02
11:20:10, Sat
Type of Message
OUTBOX
2016-04-02
11:53:01, Sat
2016-04-02
12:29:03, Sat
2016-04-02
20:56:08, Sat
2016-04-02
21:22:02, Sat
2016-04-02
21:24:34, Sat
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
So look, you say we text on that phone when we talk about hillary
because it can't be traced, you were just venting be you feel bad
that you're gone so much but it can't be helped right now.
Right. But did you say anything other than work? I didj^^m
Btw, he got neither of the two asac jobs he was in for earlier, and
saidm (who sits on the asac board) said he wasn't getting
Milwaukee, coming up. Talked about him with Bill, too. He's of the
same mind I am. \n\nGotta figure out what to do with
That sucks aboutDo they have any suggestions?
idea what to do about^^f. Probably suggest he try a different
division (ct? lod?) to expand his experience.
I told you the story from^^J about Andy getting his number?
No, don't think I know the andy^^J story. Or if I do I don't
remember. _
Pretty sure I told you - Mike heimbach lamenting how bad it was
and what they'd have to do to get him selected for wfo. Anyway, I
can tell you again
2016-04-03
11:08:36, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-04-03
12:35:05, Sun
INBOX
2016-04-03
12:52:43, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-04-03
12:53:47, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-04-03
12:54:08, Sun
INBOX
2016-04-03
12:54:33, Sun
OUTBOX
I woke up thinking about and now I'm f-ing pissed and
can't fall back asleep. \U0001f620\U0001f620\U0001f620
And yeah.
behavior was inappropriate. I need to talk to him.
And then at
6:30 I got all mad again about the fact that^H is now talking to
DOJ about my question. Because it is THAT offensive that I would
dare question him. Asshole. _
And then I get mad because I too can let rip all sorts of smart
remarks, but because I'm a girl younger my position whatever I'm
expected to remain above the fray. _
You get you're not the part that's objectionable to him, right? It's
the while thing _
Uh huh. I'm just the part that keeps coming up.
2
DOJ-PROD-OOOOCI94
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
2016-04-03
12:55:06, Sun
2016-04-03
12:55:49, Sun
2016-04-03
12:55:58, Sun
2016-04-03
12:56:31, Sun
2016-04-03
12:56: 58, Sun
2016-04-03
12:57:26, Sun
2016-04-03
12:58:32, Sun
2016-04-03
12:59:33, Sun
2016-04-03
13:00:29, Sun
Type of Message
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
No. You're a professional and someone who works in the office of
the highest ranking agent in the FBI. You behave professionally and
appropriately. _
You remain above the fray because that's the right thing to do, not
because you're a woman or young or a n ything else . _
Everyone gets^H was out of line.
I don't believe that for a second.
And he was perfectly fine in the meeting. Which means the "out of
line" has be e n happe ning since the n. _ _
And remember -1 didn't tell this to^H because I had forgotten -
you whispered it to me, and only after George said "share your
wisdom with the group" did you mention it. _
He wasn't perfectly fine in the meeting. I thought he was angry and
you were leaving. \n\nWhich part of what I said don't you believe?
And what do you mean by out if line has been happening since the
meeting* _
That everyone gets he was out of line.
It's the part that keeps coming up with I have not heard
anything from anyone else in the meeting (other than
talking ABOUT^H). Because, I suspect, that was on him to
research/speak to and he didn't and it was questioned.
2016-04-03
13:00:58, Sun
INBOX
Everyone on our side does. 1 can't speak to DoJ. 1 told you what 1
toid^^^^g.
2016-04-03
13:01:04, Sun
OUTBOX
And no, 1 don't have a problem with how he was in the meeting at
all. 1 have a problem with the amount it has been a point of
controversy since then, the amount that "that girl with the
question" has clearly been discussed.
2016-04-03
13:02:00, Sun
OUTBOX
Our side equals you and Jon and maybeGive me a break
Pete. If you guys don't have my back I've got real problems.
2016-04-03
13:02:43, Sun
OUTBOX
Whatever. We don't need to talk about it.
2016-04-03
13:04:13, Sun
INBOX
He was angry and talked to me - after 1 brought it up - and with
j|||||||. He may have spoken to^^^f after 1 brought it up with
him. \n\nl think - and I may wrong - you are conflating the motives
behind Randy Andy and
with the ones at the meeting. The
former is more along the lines of what you're saying. The meeting
wasn't a function of yur age or gender. would have
responded exactly the same way to a 45 year old male from the
DD's office saying what you did.
3
DOJ-PROD-OOOOCI95
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2016-04-03
13:06:07, Sun
INBOX
A) we have your back. Strongly and forever. So you'll be good.
\U0001f636\nB) Bill had no problem with what you said. \nC) there
were no other FBI in the room at that point. \nD) Andy needs to
f*cking say something to his crew.
2016-04-03
13:09:37, Sun
OUTBOX
You don't know that, re But whatever, it really doesn't
matter.
2016-04-03
13:10:20, Sun
INBOX
It's true that 1 don't.
2016-04-03
13:11:04, Sun
INBOX
And i do believe there's an inherent sexism in most people. So 1
can't argue too strongly. Just my suspicion.
2016-04-03
13:11:21, Sun
OUTBOX
A) You have my back. Maybe Bill who knows,^^ only if she's
not threatened.
2016-04-03
13:12:31, Sun
INBOX
Truly, I'm going to talk to him. 1 think my main message is what 1
told^^^^J you've got a bunch of very good, bright attorneys in
that room, and you're going to get a ton more bees with honey
rather than vinegar. And then reinforce you're a superstar. Is that
the right path?
2016-04-03
13:13:22, Sun
INBOX
A) that's life. 1 think most people can only count on one hand
the number of people who truly have their back, no matter what.
\U0001f636+H466
2016-04-03
13:20:38, Sun
OUTBOX
1 guess. 1 would probably be more direct - they don't know you
from adam, why are they supposed to take your word for it?
Especially when they're all used to the no brigade at DOJ. And if it
is that straightforward and obvious an answer, it shouldn't take
much work to demonstrate that to everyone.
2016-04-03
13:22:21, Sun
INBOX
Makes sense.
2016-04-03
13:23:07, Sun
INBOX
Do you have any desire to meet him - meeting about privilege or
lunch or HH? (1 strongly suspect i know the answer)
2016-04-03
13:24:58, Sun
OUTBOX
You do know the answer. He can act all big and "sure I'll get a drink
with anyone" but at the end of the day that meetup is going to go
no better.
2016-04-03
13:26:53, Sun
OUTBOX
And truly, I'm not sure why you're going to say more to him in the
place. what do you
think you're going to accomplish?
2016-04-03
13:29:25, Sun
INBOX
it's also defending a friend, a
colleague, who 1 have immense respect for. Whose back 1
have.\n\nWhat 1 hope to accomplish is to understand his
perspective on privilege, tell him he's been an ass, and defend you.
DOJ-PROD-OOOOCI96
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
2016-04-03
13:32:03, Sun
Type of Message
OUTBOX
2016-04-03
13:36:04, Sun
INBOX
2016-04-04
20:35:09, Mon
INBOX
2016-04-04
20:37:09, Mon
INBOX
2016-04-04
20:37:45, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-04-04
20:56:43, Mon
INBOX
2016-04-05
11:28:11, Tue
INBOX
2016-04-05
11:52:42, Tue
INBOX
2016-04-05
12:22:20, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-04-05
12:35:36, Tue
INBOX
2016-04-05
22:23:32, Tue
INBOX
2016-04-05
22:24:51, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-04-05
22:25:23, Tue
INBOX
2016-04-05
22:25:33, Tue
INBOX
2016-04-07
01:44:04, Thu
INBOX
2016-04-07
15:40:29, Thu
INBOX
And I'm just telling you it's pointless. Because he's not going to
care what you have to say about me, or^H or baker or
whomever, and he's not going to care or listen to the notion that
he's been an ass. He's the most aggressive prosecutor any agent
has ever worked with. \n\nRe the understanding his view on
privilege, he's going to have to explain that - to lawyers, not agents
- whether you say anything or not. _
Not sure I agree with your first point, but I understand it. And I
agree with your se cond. I just w a nt to kn ow what it is. _
You on your call?^^^ ambushed me...30 minutes
later...\U0001f612
He literally followed me down the hallway arguing for||
...he does care, just a little TOO zealous
sometimes. _
I know. He just doesn't know how to let go. But it is because he
just CaresSo M uch. _
HH stopped by give me 3
Just realized Y° u
straight into wrap.j’^^^
probably go from your meeting at doj
Hey are you going to need your UC policy working folder?
Yeah, I will. Will get it at some point.
Ok. I'm leaving for wf around 9 - want me to leave it someplace? If
you're en route to^[^J| before then I could maybe meet you up
there+H730 _
And sorry about Andy...I'm sure he eventually well, but you
shouldn't have had to wait this long. \U0001f615
Yeah well I'm such a valued player...
And truly have 30 things to tell you (some or all of which can wait
till tomorrow), including an interview Bill is stressing about and
wants me to do in NY. \n\nYou are! _
This is a weak spot for Andy
Couple of things. Same thing^f called about (timing of getting
Combetta and judges at edva) plus disagreement withal on
interview topic for Mills (^^^J is right)
Hey got a very cimplete answer from Bill just now.
5
DOJ-PROD-OOOOCI97
Strozk-Page Texts
2016-04-08 OUTBOX Maybe it is a friend thing. I gotta say, when he sent the email, and
00:19:35, Fri then was so concerned by my reaction that he followed up with
that call, my overall feeling was "oh good, he cares!" I'm even okay
with him caring out of a selfish desire because he really wants me
to keep working for him. And so now I just feel like a suckered
maybe? Guess he didn't care enough.
I don't know. That's the best I can come up with.
I'd feel that way. No doubt about it. \n\nBut see what I just
imsged. I don't know if "friendship" changes when it's a superior -
subordinate relationship, particularly when it's an advisor - high
ranking dynamic (in other words, I think it's different - some - from
my relationship with^^^^^^^J)
And interesting how elusive it is (for me, too!) to put ones finger
on. \n\nl guess for me it's the thought (hope) that he's a stand up
guy. And this is not stand up behavior. And when it's about YOU
that's extra hard.\n\nLet me ask this (though maybe it doesn't
translate). What would Giacalone do?
I do think it's because he's my friend too. And honestly, I know he's
my vast superior, but he's never treated me like that. Nor I him. So
mostly I do just consider him my friend. _
Re giacalone, I really don't know. I think he would have taken it
head on and addressed it, but he's such a different person, he
would have done it in an awkward shucks-y way. Andy's not like
that, just has to be earnest and direct, which is harder. John would
say, "hey c'mon go easy on her. She's helping me out, means no
harm, etc." I think? But what do I know.
2016-04-08 OUTBOX Remind me to tell you what came up st the end of convo with
00:51:49, Fri toscas. Punchline is it ends with andy telling Toscas that he is going
to ask me to follow up with Stu on that joint venture stuff.
2016-04-08 INBOX
00: 52:15, Fri _
2016-04-08 INBOX
00:54:35, Fri
2016-04-08
20:21:07, Fri
INBOX
Were you able to talk to Andy about Randy?
2016-04-08
20:26:58, Fri
OUTBOX
Sort of. Will explain.
2016-04-08
20:27:31, Fri
INBOX
Sort of?!?!?! What?
Good!!!!
That's gotta make you happy.
2016-04-08 OUTBOX
00:19:43, Fri _
2016-04-08 INBOX
00:32:06, Fri
2016-04-08 INBOX
00:34:14, Fri
2016-04-08 OUTBOX
00:47:29, Fri
2016-04-08 OUTBOX
00:49:36, Fri
6
DOJ-PROD-OOOOCI98
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2016-04-08
20:28:38, Fri
INBOX
Oh. Talking to Randy. Got it.
2016-04-08
OUTBOX
e ,- c ... -f , a |^ e; ]
20:29:26, Fri
about Randy.
2016-04-08
20:45:16, Fri
INBOX
Of course 1 can't wait to hear...
2016-04-08
22:28:32, Fri
INBOX
Just talked with^^^f. Sounds like there was guidance received...
2016-04-08
22:29:23, Fri
OUTBOX
Good!
2016-04-08
22:29:45, Fri
OUTBOX
What was the guidance?
2016-04-08
22:30:28, Fri
INBOX
Talk briefly?
2016-04-08
22:31:00, Fri
OUTBOX
Sure, but everyone close by
2016-04-08
22:59:45, Fri
OUTBOX
Andy just called. Will try to call if 1 can. He spoke to randy. Randy
says everything all good
2016-04-08
23:21:38, Fri
INBOX
said.
2016-04-09
01:18:28, Sat
INBOX
2016-04-09
01:18:35, Sat
INBOX
2016-04-09
INBOX
01:18:45, Sat
2016-04-09
01:37:25, Sat
OUTBOX
Whew! Ho boy.
2016-04-09
02:17:10, Sat
INBOX
You think 1 should pull the whole doj contingent, or just or
2016-04-09
02:40:47, Sat
INBOX
So. Shouldlpull^^^H aside and tell just him first?
2016-04-09
02:41:03, Sat
OUTBOX
Oh, sorry, 1 never answered that!
2016-04-09
02:41:33, Sat
OUTBOX
1 would tell^^^J and^H.
7
DOJ-PROD-0000099
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
2016-04-09
02:42:37, Sat
INBOX
2016-04-09
02:42:47, Sat
OUTBOX
2016-04-09
02:42:53, Sat
INBOX
2016-04-09
02:43:39, Sat
INBOX
2016-04-09
02:44:42, Sat
OUTBOX
2016-04-09
02:45:27, Sat
OUTBOX
2016-04-09
02:47:53, Sat
INBOX
2016-04-09
02:47:56, Sat
OUTBOX
2016-04-09
02:48:21, Sat
OUTBOX
2016-04-09
02:49:15, Sat
INBOX
2016-04-09
02:49:35, Sat
INBOX
2016-04-09
02:50:25, Sat
INBOX
2016-04-09
02:51:46, Sat
INBOX
2016-04-09
02:52:05, Sat
OUTBOX
2016-04-09
02:52:05, Sat
INBOX
2016-04-09
02:52:48, Sat
INBOX
2016-04-09
03:01:52, Sat
INBOX
2016-04-09
03:04:53, Sat
OUTBOX
2016-04-09
03:06:06, Sat
INBOX
2016-04-09
03:06:39, Sat
OUTBOX
2016-04-09
12:33:09, Sat
INBOX
That's what I'm thinking, too.^f will be a calming influence.
That's a real f-u to laufman though.
And we have a long relationship.
Yep. Which he deserves, frankly. Funny, despite my various
feelings, I'm not at all worried about that.
And jesus, did you just see the Times update?
Did he come for the prep?
Yes I did and yes he did. But he's literally doing nothing other than
sitting in on the big interviews. _
Wow. This is quite interesting. Jaffar is THE privacy guy at the
ACLU.\n\nWhy Apple\u2019s Stand Against the F.B.I. Hurts Its
Own Customers http://nyti.ms/lWiZafn _
I know. He's such a douche wad.
And sigh. His underlying emotional terrain certainly complicates it.
And kudos to you for being sensitive to it \n\nYou're a good
woman, Charlie Brown.;)
I know who^J is.;)
Stupid autocorrect undermined my gentle snark.^^J...
I have had correspondence from him to me explaining how I was
undermining his clients God and Constitutionally given rights.
You should really stop doing that.
Not following - he needs a softer touch?
I know. I am The Man. \n\nBernie loving^J would hate me
Do you think I'm misplaying not having David there with^^^|
and ^|?
If you doH then just do the whole team. 3 out of the 4 is
ridiculous. So yeah, then I would just do the whole team.
No, would just be^^^f and \n\nOr add David and m
Just add them both, do it all at once. Then there's no grounds for
complaint about that.
Gotta go get Laufman
8
DOJ-PROD-OOOOIOO
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2016-04-09
12:52:13, Sat
INBOX
They are p*ssed. Just oh so slightly
2016-04-09
12:53:28, Sat
OUTBOX
Oh well.
2016-04-09
12:54:35, Sat
OUTBOX
2016-04-09
12:55:20, Sat
OUTBOX
Did you have to invoke the D/Dd?
2016-04-09
12:59:19, Sat
INBOX
-yep
2016-04-09
16:37:32, Sat
INBOX
Done, but 1 need to call Bill with the storm that's coming
2016-04-09
19:12:07, Sat
INBOX
Found a way thru convo with to subsequently suggest to Bill
he needed to follow up with JB.
2016-04-09
21:09:58, Sat
INBOX
2016-04-09
OUTBOX
21:12:06, Sat
2016-04-09
21:13:47, Sat
INBOX
2016-04-09
INBOX
21:14:08, Sat
2016-04-09
23:58:52, Sat
INBOX
And Bill just said he and JB missed each other, and the JB has an
event tonight. Guess they'll talk tomorrow...
2016-04-10
INBOX
1 find I'm
01:20:08, Sun
increasingly profoundly bothered by JBs call and the lack of ANY
heads up. Deeply. It was wrong given what 1 had already been
asked to do. Gonna sleep on it and see where 1 am in the morning.
9
DOJ-PROD-OOOOIOI
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
2016-04-10
02:09:14, Sun
Type of Message
INBOX
Because you know where I was on Thursday or Friday night - when
I was complaining about everyone expecting me to deliver the hard
message while they vacillated in discussing with their counterparts.
About how my sense of justness and character was at odds with
waiting until Sat to say something. \n\nAnd rightfully, you point
out stop being so prima donna-ish and just do it. \n\nAnd i do.
\n\nAnd then I find out an hour later that in addition to what I was
asked to do, JB went to counsel and had the discussion he did. And
I'm the one facing the music. From some who I have known for a
long time. Nobody else pays the price. Nobody else will have the
same straight hard discussion. Yet I'm the only one who violated
his sense of integrity to swallow hard and deliver the message.
2016-04-10
02:09:52, Sun
2016-04-10
05:51:15, Sun
INBOX
OUTBOX
2016-04-10
05:52:00, Sun
2016-04-10
11:33:08, Sun
2016-04-11
13:56 :15, Mon
2016-04-11
15:52:27, Mon
2016-04-11
22:19:37, Mon
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
2016-04-11
22:19:40, Mon
2016-04-11
22:20:43, Mon
2016-04-11
23:00:05, Mon
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
I'm not sure if I want to be part of this
You are a part of this and that's not going to change. But I think
you have every right to be angry and frustrated about being left
out of the loop on your investigation, especially when you're going
to be left holding the bag. And I think you're entitled to say
something to Baker about that, though on this one I would
probably discu ss w ith Bill first. _
I'm sorry^^f Big big case, big big problems. But God knows
you're still the right guy to do it.F!1133 _
Gmailed you two drafts of what I'm thinking of sending Bill, would
appreciate your thoughts. Second (more recent) is updated so you
can skip the first. _
Andy just called to make sure I had heard everything. Call when
you're free _ _
Bill wants to talk to me at 1215...
Just talked with Bill, who spoke with
everyone this morning. Will fill you in tonight or tomorrow.
\n\nAlso, he was under the impression Andy wanted the meeting
and a prebrief with FBI only just before. I think may have
screwed up that scheduling. Can you check? Obviously want to
confirm with him before going toB^jff
We talked for 45 minutes...
Wow. Can you talk now?
Sent email to andy re pre-brief. Will let you know what he says.
Will wait to reach out to^^l re call-in line until I hear from him.
10
DOJ-PROD-0000102
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
2016-04-11
23:13:06, Mon
2016-04-13
00:40:33, Wed
Type of Message
INBOX
INBOX
Oof. Laufman just left me a minute long message. Don't think I'm
going to listen tonight. \n\nAnd it's weird. CES always shows as
"restricted" when the call is coming in but then shows true name
afterwards on the call list. Needless to say, I screen all restricted
calls... ___
Talked with^H for a while. She couldn't remember who said the
D was going to talk to the AG on Sun night or Mon about this.
2016-04-13 INBOX
0 2:21:0 3, Wed__
2016-04-13 OUTBOX
02:22:07, Wed _
2016-04-13 INBOX
02:29:48, Wed
2016-04-13 INBOX
10:55:35, Wed
2016-04-13 OUTBOX
11:00:08, Wed _
2016-04-13 INBOX
21:54:09, Wed
2016-04-13 OUTBOX
21:58:34, Wed _
2016-04-13 INBOX
21:59:00, Wed
2016-04-14 INBOX
00:02:03, Thu
2016-04-14 OUTBOX
00:20:20, Thu _
2016-04-14 INBOX
00:37:11, Thu
2016-04-14
00:39:56, Thu
2016-04-14
01:11:35, Thu
OUTBOX
INBOX
My point in forwarding the email was to talk about how we get to
a productive pla ce
We'll get there, but for this meeting I'd solely just be taking^m
lead.
Well sure, but would be nice to know what that lead is in advance
rather than, I don't know, f*ck me in the *ss wirhout saying
anything, kinda like^ calling counsel the night before. \n\nToo
much negative done to expect benefit of the doubt.
Maybe we can find some time to talk today
about the MYE thing? Really need to put it to rest. Certainly before
the meeting tomorrow, if I can. _
I will. I promise.
Btw, forgot to mentiom, Bill had me forward invite tomorrow to
m \U0001f612
Are you serious?
Yep. Came up in the meeting.
Spoke to^^^J need to talk to you at some point. Not urgent, so
can certainly wait
so free to talk.
Hi. I can talk now.
Thank you. \U0001f636 \n\nWas obviously constrained on my
comments. What I identified IS what bothers me the most. And the
rest is nonsense. _
And I think that frustration is fair. But it doesn't change the
fundamental okay-ness of the prior two decisions (the summation
and the call to her). It just means it would be best to handle it
differently in the future. And Jim WILL understand that. Just talk to
him, one on one. You don't need to get Bill's permission, clear
through him, just go talk to him. It will all be fine.
I will. He told Bill on Monday he'd be happy to talk to me any time.
11
DOJ-PROD-0000103
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2016-04-14
01:12:09, Thu
2016-04-14
01:34:16, Thu
INBOX
INBOX
And I'm kinda sad about going to NZ...but it's the right decision.
\U0001f612
Oh. Boo. ..I'll talk to her. If Jon and I are here, she doesn't need to.
Unless there is privilege research going on. She said she had
already done some.
2016-04-14
19:59:45, Thu
INBOX
JM got funny about telling Carl first...that his standard
presentation?
2016-04-14
20:02:03, Thu
OUTBOX
No clue. That's just how he gets when he really wants something
to go a certain way but he doesn't like confrontation.
2016-04-14
23:30:32, Thu
OUTBOX
Still here. \U0001f612\n\nForgot to tell you that randy asked if we
could talk and get a cup of coffee next week. Which is good, I
suppose.
2016-04-14
23:34:44, Thu
2016-04-15
00:45:28, Fri
INBOX
OUTBOX
And yeah, that's good about randy. Hopefully a very different
ch aracter of c onvo than whatever Castor wanted to say.
Good qt with andy. Got to talk about a lot of
substantive stuff.
2016-04-15
00:48:39, Fri
2016-04-15
00:49:52^Fri
2016-04-15
10:32:23, Fri
2016-04-15
22:09:10, Fri
2016-04-15
22:27:15, Fri
2016-04-15
22:35:57, Fri
2016-04-15
22:37:13, Fri
2016-04-15
22:59:25, Fri
2016-04-15
23:01:05, Fri
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
I'm glad - look forward to hearing about it i figured you left late
after] got an emai[from him at 7:45...
Oh did he respond to yours? He didn't say anything.
Hi. Well you're good for a late start, at least, Andy's
And sorry about
delay, I was talking to Bill. Interesting Apple story if you have time
to talk this weekend. Nothing urgent, it can certainly wait until
Monday.
12
DOJ-PROD-0000104
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
2016-04-16
00:41:38, Sat
2016-04-16
01:11:12, Sat
2016-04-16
01:13:56 , S at
2016-04-19
22:20: 24, Tue
2016-04-19
22:33:36, Tue
2016-04-19
22:41:32, Tue
2016-04-20
10:59:04, Wed
Type of Message
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
2016-04-20
11:00:35, Wed
OUTBOX
Body
And how much should I reach out to^^^f? He's still genuinely
hurt. I may have been a bit callous this afternoon. Or at least,
tough lo ve. _
You should not reach out to^^^f. Jesus, he's an adult. He
should act like one. _
Sigh. Agreed. My soft heart feels badly.
And still in
with a ndy.
Hi going to try and catch Bill
Still in with andy
Hey are you ok if I pass to team (including doj) that as of last eve,
JB has not talked with|^B?\n\nAlso, thinking about setting up
meeting with Brooks and you,^H, Moffa. Want him to hear legal
reasons why we need extraordinary measures, see interest of
office of DD, and give him a little prep time for his folks to get him
options (if any) _
Yes. Just so you know, he waited to call her until Monday (on
purpose, wanted to resist the she calls and we jump), as of
yesterday afternoon she hadn't responded. \n\nThat's fine too.
2016-04-20
11:13:29, Wed
INBOX
Ok re JB. What's the best way for the team to intetact/coordinate
with him? I was thinking^^^l really just want to get control over
the investigation.\n\nAlso, remind me brief to Bill on|H|
2016-04-20
11:27:24, Wed
2016-04-20
JTL:28:29, Wed
2016-04-20
11:32:10, Wed
2016-04-20
11:32:28, Wed
2016-04-20
11:35:5 9, Wed
2016-04-20
11:36:38, Wed
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
Maybe you should reach out to him? Just swing by his ofc before 8
and ask for an update? _
Won't be in until 8...stupid non-hov commute ,.\U0001f615+H1721
flB won't ask him direct, she'll feel the need to go thru trisha.
You can tell them I told you, it's fine.
Randy sent me an invite for 1:30-2.
ood, re Randy, right?+H1728
2016-04-20
11:39:05, Wed
2016-04-20
12:53:07, Wed
INBOX
OUTBOX
In addition to^^|, remind me convo about OIA at 1:00 yesterday
Hey check your vm before you talk to your MYE team. Jim spoke to
beth this am, nfi.
13
DOJ-PROD-0000105
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2016-04-20
13:21:46, Wed
INBOX
Yep heard same with more detail from Bill via JB and dd, need to
talk to you
2016-04-20
13:24:17, Wed
OUTBOX
Feel free to call
2016-04-20
13:58:23, Wed
INBOX
Hey just left vm. I'm done/free....
2016-04-20
13:58:53, Wed
OUTBOX
Vm at desk or cell?
2016-04-20
14:02:33, Wed
INBOX
Cell
2016-04-20
14:10:56, Wed
INBOX
You have a rough eta?
2016-04-20
14:11:19, Wed
OUTBOX
It hasn't come up yet. Nor did it ring.
2016-04-20
14:11:32, Wed
OUTBOX
Hopefully 15. Service was REALLY slow.
2016-04-20
14:11:50, Wed
INBOX
Want me to call again? It can also wait
2016-04-20
14:14:44, Wed
OUTBOX
Yes, let's tall now
2016-04-20
19:54:31, Wed
INBOX
Hi there. I'm done.
2016-04-20
19:57:34, Wed
OUTBOX
Waiting outside Andy's office now, and then I'm leaving. Randy is in
his office now.
2016-04-20
20:35:40, Wed
INBOX
Also, Bill said he would email JB and cc you and JM the white paper
you reviewed earlier.
2016-04-20
21:12:40, Wed
INBOX
Good talk with Jb, will tell you all about that tomorrow.
2016-04-25
23:54:32, Mon
OUTBOX
Andy texted again:\n\nl heard this morning at the DOJ brief. GT
and 1 discussed the strategy. 1 think they have it lined out.
2016-04-26
12:53:53, Tue
OUTBOX
‘1 have a 15 minute meeting with
Trisha at 9:15 now. \U0001f612
2016-04-26
21:21:18, Tue
OUTBOX
And forgot to tell you that 1 spoke to Andy. Went well. Hope it is
truly behind us.
2016-04-26
21:22:09, Tue
INBOX
That was it! You'll have to tell me tomorrow.
2016-04-26
21:23:06, Tue
INBOX
Im glad. 1 think it is (behind you). Thats the good part in that he
couldn't have been more crystal clear.
2016-04-26
21:59:42, Tue
INBOX
Talked with^^J She said she thought the DC Bar limitations made
sense, but 1 asked her to verify and that I'd appreciate
understanding/her take on the matter, before brief to D on Thurs.
Mike is supposed to send her a case.
2016-04-26
22:01:18, Tue
OUTBOX
1 don't understand why a taint team isn't sufficient...
14
DOJ-PROD-OOOOIO6
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
2016-04-26
22:01:31, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-04-26
22:03:06, Tue
INBOX
2016-04-26
22:03:44, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-04-26
22:06:30, Tue
INBOX
2016-04-26
22:07:09, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-04-26
22:08:11, Tue
INBOX
2016-04-26
22:08:16, Tue
INBOX
2016-04-26
22:08:42, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-04-26
22:08:42, Tue
INBOX
2016-04-26
22:09:14, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-04-26
22:11:26, Tue
INBOX
2016-04-26
22:12:00, Tue
INBOX
2016-04-26
22:12:22, Tue
INBOX
2016-04-26
22:12:28, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-04-26
22:12:29, Tue
INBOX
2016-04-26
22:12:43, Tue
INBOX
2016-04-26
22:13:23, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-04-26
22:14:37, Tue
INBOX
2016-04-26
22:14:41, Tue
INBOX
2016-04-26
22:14:45, Tue
INBOX
2016-04-26
22:14:46, Tue
INBOX
I wish Steve was alive. He would absolutely know this answer.
\U0001f61e\n\nHow much do bar regs vary?
Some, but this big of a difference would be really anomalous.
Talking with^^^f.^^^^ specifically asked him NOT to talk to
me until AFTER he talked to Andy
Uh okay. And he waited three days because?...
No. Just now. Tonght. About this afternoons covo
Conversation.
The 2:00 you mean?
Tell you what,^J can come lead this fucking case with^^^f. I'l
go work cases and get my car back _
I'll mention to andy. Why did George insist on that?
Read the email I just sent, note bcc
Because is playing the you're not getting accurate
information" game and is allowing it to happen.
Fuck thid
That's not okay.
This. Thanks Samsung
Hell no it's not.
We will fix this.
Bullshit. We will puss out. If I got a quarter of the support^
blindly gives his guys, we might, but we won't. \n\nAnd I don't
want to burn our relationship with this snd|j^|
Jesus I'm maf
15
DOJ-PROD-0000107
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
2016-04-26
22:16:11, Tue
2016-04-26
22:16:16, Tue
2016-04-26
22:40:06, Tue
Type of Message
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
Body
You should be. 100% Enraged.
I called you.
Just talked to Bill and qualified the fact vs my assumption in the
email. Also told him about "did you talk to Andy"
comment last night. He is going to talk to Andy tomorrow morning.
2016-04-26 OUTBOX
22:40:31, Tue _
2016-04-26 INBOX
22:41:16, Tue
2016-04-26
22:42:01, Tue
2016-04-26
22:42:57, Tue
2016-04-27
00:10:23, Wed
2016-04-27
00:31:42, Wed
2016-04-27
00:49:51, Wed
2016-04-27
00:58:23, Wed
2016-04-27
01:22:25, Wed
2016-04-27
01:22:58, Wed
2016-04-27
01:23:33, Wed
2016-04-27
01:25:16, Wed
2016-04-27
01:26:35, Wed
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
\U0001f621\U0001f621\U0001f621\U0001f621\U0001f621\U000
lf621\ U00 01f621\U0001f621\ U0001f621_
Want to tell at^^^|. Scars motherf*cker? You want to see
scars?
I know bHli l I know. It isn't right. But it's not worth burning your
relationship with the I
over. Let's take his temperature first.
E ven better, let him do your dirty w ork.
God I'm really angry with
If he had any dignity at all, he'd
give you, us, some credit for the persistence in this area. They just
suck so much. I hope^Hj has the self-awareness and character to
do so. _
Talked to him just now, too. More info about George go if direct
with Andy - concern about info JB didn't have about the case in the
context of his discussion with^J, and the implication of the
faulty telephone process going on with info flow in the fbi
\U0001f612 _
OUTBOX
Can you talk now?
INBOX
I'll of course give
you a complete dump about what^^Bsaid/whenever you
want.H2010
INBOX
Thanks for observations about JB. Cost of doing business if D and
DD are going to use him.
OUTBOX
And also, he's not "the team." This is all a red herring.
OUTBOX
Pisses me off a little that Andy hasn't called back. 1 guess it's
possible he's still at dinner...
INBOX
Who's not the team - JB? Fine, but D and dd decided to use him.
And ifaccurate, was the cause of wondering what info is or
isnt passed up. After all, of JB doesn't know that, what doesn't
Andy know? _
Yeah I get it, but George KNOWS jb. This is all bs. Whatever, I'm
just irritated.
16
DOJ-PROD-OOOOIO8
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
2016-04-27
01:31: 29, Wed
2016-04-27
01:32:54, Wed
2016-04-27
01:33:57, Wed
2016-04-27
01:34:07, Wed
Type of Message
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
2016-04-27 OUTBOX
01:34:36, Wed _
2016-04-27 INBOX
01:37:04, Wed
2016-04-27
01:38:34, Wed
OUTBOX
2016-04-27
01:42:03, Wed
INBOX
2016-04-27
01:52:01, Wed
OUTBOX
2016-04-27
02:05:41, Wed
INBOX
2016-04-27
02:06:41, Wed
INBOX
2016-04-27
02:07:08, Wed
OUTBOX
2016-04-27
02:08:37, Wed
OUTBOX
2016-04-27
02:09:07, Wed
OUTBOX
2016-04-27
02:09:37, Wed
INBOX
2016-04-27
02:10:34, Wed
OUTBOX
I am too. This also plays into "Georges special relationship" with
Andy_ _
Think we should touch topic of during D brief?
Hmm. Let me get to you aboutthatone^^^Btalked to me this am
about jb and ta's position re haven't had a
cha nce to dig in yet. _ _
And please re Andy don't go too far. He (and J) knows we are
close, right? And while what you're saying is exactly right, would
you say it for any schmuck? _
Probably not, but you're not any schmuck.
\U0001f636\U0001f636\U0001f636 (damn right \U0001f609)\n\nl
think we mention that part (specifically that we're cleared to go
back to task). I was talking about the specific allegation. We
haven't discussed with him in a briefing we've given. I almost want
to do it so 1) he knows we're aware 2) demonstrate that to Trisha
and whoever else is deep in the "secret secret, ive got a secret"
mindset and 3) get a sense of what he's thinking.
I just think andy is probably keeping him appraised of this, but we
can talk about it.
Agree. It is substantive in that it is relevant to the case, just not
sure if there is a decision point or information he would want in
the context if his thinking about the issue. _
Yeah, can maybe have bill ask andy, but otherwise don't think it's
probably n ec essary. _ _
Ha. Want to talk to you about^^f and her comment, too...
stupid comment, and whether you want me to say
anything to her
What would you say?
So, it looks like there is a networking/break starting at 2, then kerry
sleeper from 2:15 to 2:45, then homicide trends at 2:45-3:15, then
another networking/break. I would schedule for 2:00.
Then 3:30 is Oregon standoff/managing relationships.
Just reinforce that you're good people, experienced, credible. Not
"little" anything. Not sure it would make a difference but willing to.
I'd be more interested in finding out why she said it. "What was up
with little counsel girl? Do you not like her?"_
17
DOJ-PROD-0000109
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2016-04-27
02:10:54, Wed
OUTBOX
1 don't need her to like me. 1 need to to treat me with respect
around others.
2016-04-27
02:11:05, Wed
INBOX
Ok. Will aim for then with JM. Thats the same time we have
blocked for mye wrap with Bill
2016-04-27
02:12:25, Wed
OUTBOX
So then 1 would go direct with her and not thru jm.
2016-04-27
02:12:34, Wed
INBOX
Want me to grab you at 5? Also, see email, 1 think 1 just gave|liS|
reason to skip
2016-04-27
02:13:04, Wed
OUTBOX
1 know. 1 saw email. Hence my :(for^H. She invited me to it.
\U0001f636
2016-04-27
02:13:15, Wed
INBOX
Have confirmation thru Andy he wants a meeting? All 1 have is
George via^^^j
2016-04-27
02:13:30, Wed
OUTBOX
Nope, I'd rely on that.
2016-04-27
02:13:40, Wed
OUTBOX
He wants to go thru George, so be it
2016-04-27
02:13:40, Wed
INBOX
I'll cancel the brief.
2016-04-27
02:13:58, Wed
OUTBOX
Don't cancel the brief, obviously.
2016-04-27
03:25:04, Wed
OUTBOX
Forgot to mention, 1 asked Trisha about embeddingwith a
squad at WFO for a few days, and she thought it was a great idea.
Need to clear it through chain first \U0001f612, but please give
a little thought to where it might make sense tostick^Bfora^
couple of days. Thanks for the excellent idea. Mf ?. - Mil|
2016-04-27
11:54:31, Wed
INBOX
?°t cone ith Eil j grabbing
Im ill hi 1 willi^B mil Inn
2016-04-27
12:50:30, Wed
INBOX
Just got done withBmf
2016-04-27
12:50:36, Wed
INBOX
Who is worthless
2016-04-27
12:53:37, Wed
INBOX
Re^^J embedding, what area (s) is^J going to be working?
2016-04-27
12:54:58, Wed
OUTBOX
Trisha doesn't know yet. But 1 suggested maybe a Cl squad, and she
was fine with that. Just don't make any moves yet though please.
2016-04-27
15:04:19, Wed
INBOX
R'tV.Going to try and find out if DD in fact wants a
meeting today with Toscas et al, as well as Bill's convo with him.
2016-04-27
15:04:59, Wed
OUTBOX
He didn't get my text until this am, so 1 haven't spoken to him
either.
18
DOJ-PROD-OOOO110
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2016-04-27
22:55:04, Wed
INBOX
Hey just talked to Bill. He has not talked to Andy yet about Toscas
but says he still intends to. He said Andy was in a really bad mood
this morning about a news article, plus in a rush.
2016-04-27
22:55:39, Wed
OUTBOX
He was. Kortan majorly screwed up.
2016-04-27
22:56:25, Wed
INBOX
Nothing related to us (mye or cd)?
2016-04-27
23:00:14, Wed
2016-04-27
23:00:51, Wed
2016-04-27
23:57:23, Wed
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
2016-04-28
00:45:52, Thu
2016-04-28
00:49:05, Thu
OUTBOX
INBOX
No. Not at all.
Whew
Hey while I'm thinking about it please send me the name of the
forfeiture guy re^^^^H Thanks
hank you. I'm sure the "experts" in nsd will be happy I
call him. \n\nBtw, how utterly f*cked up is it that George was by
far and away the most aggressive DoJ person in the room today?
2016-04-28
23:13:42, Thu
2016-04-29
00:30:35, Fri
2016-04-29
00:32:13, Fri
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
Dude, your wrap is loooong. Waiting on Bill before reaching out to
CES, also curious as to your thoughts about revised statement - Bill
really wants to write something.\n\nYou have a while to go yet?
Sorry one work Q I forgot - D mentioned^® Do you think that was
something someone inside related to him or his outside checking
up? _
He no doubt calledBHH
2016-04-29
00:33:29, Fri
INBOX
Makes sense. Wasn't sure if it was something he heard from JB or
Andy via the team
2016-04-29
00:44:50, Fri
2016-04-29
00:47:44, Fri
OUTBOX
INBOX
My guess is complaints from jb and Andy about the low levels of
engagement at doj led to discussions of who is on the team...
I regret not saying (though I have in the past) is eah,l
ok, but edva is clearly second fiddle to nsd.
might be
2016-04-29
13:04:06, Fri
INBOX
This sucks already. ..team walking to Woodward Table for farewell
he a
19
DOJ-PROD-OOOO111
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
2016-04-29
16:50:52, Fri
INBOX
2016-04-29
16:51:39, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-04-29
16:54:49, Fri
INBOX
2016-04-29
16:55:44, Fri
INBOX
2016-04-29
16:56:02, Fri
INBOX
2016-04-29
16:57:07, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-04-29
16:58:21, Fri
INBOX
2016-04-29
18:01:20, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-04-29
18:06:10, Fri
INBOX
2016-04-29
18:06:10, Fri
INBOX
2016-04-29
18:07:31, Fri
INBOX
2016-04-29
18:08:08, Fri
OUTBOX
Toscas showed up. Just like Thurs meeting, he was by far the most
aggressive DoJ in the room. Literally siding with us and fighting
back againstet al's concerns. \U0001f621\n\nl literally
said, twice, stop framing your facts to them simply in terms of PC
for an affidavit. Frame your argument in terms of what is most
compelling in the big picture to achieve what we want, then
narrow down to show how it links specifically to our case/pc/etc.
\n\nl think George got it, but jeez. It's not so hard, is it?
It's not. They're just not very good. Can you call George, ask him to
attend? _
\U0001f60a D. \n\nHe's not. Already thought to myself, Jesus
George, why can't you have this conversation. He got immediately
what I was saying (granted, he may already have had the benefit of
Andy telling him). It's a smart play. It's not complicated.
Will have to tell vou mv convo with earlier and what MU
Will have to tell you my convo with earlier and what^g
said. After I left, he apparently said he was "tired of taking sh*t
from the Bureau." \U0001f612 _
Gotta go have career counseling with Bill...should be done before
you get there, though.
Taking sht from the Bureau?! Poor^^^J It's so hard to be him.
Especially gratifying that Toscas then tells him exactly the same
thing
How'd the talk go with Bill? What'd he say?
In any event, he said he thought the world of me and couldn't
imagine me being anywhere other than the top quadrant.
Asked what I wanted to do and any geographic limitations, m
In essence said I'd
What'd he say to that?
20
DOJ-PROD-OOOO112
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
2016-04-29
18:10:33, Fri
2016-04-29
18:10:48, Fri
2016-04-29
18:12:32, Fri
2016-04-29
18:14:32, Fri
2016-04-29
18:24:00, Fri
Type of Message
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
Fie didnt, directly. Certainly didn't say no way, but nor did he say, "I
think you'll be able to do that." Two reasons, at least. Much easier
for him to argue to advance me if he can say "Pete's willing to go
to the east coast" or even mid-atlantic than it is to say "Pete's
limited to HQ and WFO." _
Second reason is he went to NY and left his family here.
Always better to
at least say "look. I'm open to the needs of the Bureau, just be
aware of these factors" rather than "I must stay here"
Especially if you do a
gig as dad first. Or be like andy and be willing to not ever be
promoted further because of your geographic limitations.
I did tell him I'd be interested in being a DAD, he said good, some
people aren't interested in that. I did caveat that later to CD by
saying if Jones or Gordon left. I suppose I'd think hard about CYD or
Crim or even CTD. Not Intel or other divisions.
2016-04-29
18:24:03, Fri
INBOX
2016-04-29
18:24:04, Fri
2016-04-29
20:30:36, Fri
2016-04-29
21:02:18, Fri
2016-04-29
21:10:59, Fri
2016-04-29
21:16:01, Fri
2016-04-29
21:39:46, Fri
2016-04-29
21:40:53, Fri
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
We talked about the impact of succession on 7th floor, egHH
asking to go out as an SAC. Fle's also not thrilled with the idea of
though hopefully^^^^^^^^^J would help
temper that. A whole lotta CTD guys being put everywhere, that's
for sure .__ _
Fley also, mye brief to Bowdich on 5/10. on the invite (just
the four of u s).___
And what is^^^f deal with Told^^J "whatever you do,
DON'T pick him. Fie will stay for 6 months and move on." So now
I've got to fight through that _
Fle's resentful of^^f from the^^^^J fights. Feels sold out by
him.
Ah. Got it. Going to have to fight back what he told Dummies
That's just my guess.
And sounds right re I
We can talk later.
21
DOJ-PROD-OOOO113
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2016-04-29
22:14:25, Fri
INBOX
Just got off the phone with|^^J (who seems suddenly fine and
not upset \U0001f612). Can give you update on phone or on
Monday. Not a lot of substantive movement.
2016-04-30
02:04:49, Sat
INBOX
And now we've switched from the Patriot Act to a wire carrying
current.X,"*
2016-05-01
12:31:06, Sun
INBOX
Btw, they've all decided in person mtgs are much better for us than
| and^^Bseparate and dialing in. \U0001f612
2016-05-01
12:33:08, Sun
INBOX
1 suppose getting the background won't kill us, though I'm
certain it will be shared with the SpecAss community up there. I've
never heard of him - what's his background?
2016-05-01
12:33:20, Sun
OUTBOX
Boy, they are just strategic geniuses arent they?
2016-05-01
12:34:45, Sun
INBOX
That was my response. \n\nBut not just that, SOO very smart that
you mustn't doubt or question them.
2016-05-01
12:35:11, Sun
OUTBOX
Yeah, that's probably part of, him going to your meeting. No clue
his story. But was thinking it might be better for more lumpies like
that to hear there's nothing there - don't know if he's smart
enough to understand, but it probably doesn't hurt anything and is
not worth trying to kick him out.
2016-05-01
12:36:43, Sun
INBOX
1 laughed when Jj said he got asked about the investigation
weekly. 1 get it daily. Maybe that's an agent - analyst difference.
2016-05-01
23:09:09, Sun
INBOX
check out Obama's remarks to the W+H2632ash Press Association
last night. Just watched it - pretty damn funny.
2016-05-02
INBOX
1 have my standing Midyear at 9:10, but should be
12:02:03, Mon
fast. 9:30 work?
2016-05-04
INBOX
|fj1-',--®| Have been dealing with J
00:02:13, Wed
f*ck up
2016-05-04
00:40:51, Wed
OUTBOX
And holy shit Cruz just dropped out of the race. It's going to be a
Clinton Trump race. Unbelievable.
2016-05-04
00:41:24, Wed
INBOX
What?!?!??
2016-05-04
00:41:37, Wed
OUTBOX
You heard that right my friend.
2016-05-04
00:41:37, Wed
INBOX
1 saw trump won, figured it would be a bit
2016-05-04
00:41:57, Wed
INBOX
Now the pressure really starts to finish MYE...
2016-05-04
00:42:32, Wed
OUTBOX
It sure does. We need to talk about follow up call tomorrow. We
still never have.
22
DOJ-PROD-OOOO114
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2016-05-04
00:43:59, Wed
INBOX
Schedule is open 9:45 until around 2:30. Let me know when 1 can
pencil you in. ;)
2016-05-04
00:49:17, Wed
OUTBOX
My schedule is utter sh*t tomorrow. 1 will let you know. :(
2016-05-04
09:53:33, Wed
INBOX
still on track forM at 7? And are you going to hit the AM briefs?
2016-05-04
09:53:57, Wed
OUTBOX
Meeting with J at 7, not going to morning briefs.
2016-05-04
OUTBOX
11:20:54, Wed
WBlfettBKIliiSiil Have to meet| shortly
2016-05-04
21:31:14, Wed
INBOX
Going back to thatB memo, just remembered Jones wants
something soon (tonght or tomorrow). 1 don't know that Bill will
read it before he gets back from London next week, but last thing 1
want is him launching it upstairs with 3rd party review in there.
2016-05-04
21:31:46, Wed
OUTBOX
Yeah, 1 would.
2016-05-04
21:32:08, Wed
INBOX
Would what?
2016-05-04
21:32:27, Wed
OUTBOX
Take it out
2016-05-04
21:33:00, Wed
OUTBOX
Or talk toH about it. Just say since we hate the third party
option, take it out.
2016-05-04
INBOX
K. 1 should probably tell no. ;
21:33:23, Wed
2016-05-04
21:35:50, Wed
INBOX
I'll call her then. Will say 1 don't like it and want to take it out
2016-05-04
21:36:17, Wed
OUTBOX
1 would at least start with it out
2016-05-04
INBOX
1 just want^J to know in advance
21:38:01, Wed
since it's her product+H2810
2016-05-04
21:55:17, Wed
INBOX
Talked to^^J took it out, taking it to Jones
2016-05-04
22:36:12, Wed
INBOX
Bill is super stressed about the new Fox report
2016-05-04
22:36:35, Wed
OUTBOX
Why? What's he going to do about it?
2016-05-04
22:37:10, Wed
OUTBOX
Why not just have him send an email to^^ and Andy explaining
what he think actually happened? Is it classified?
2016-05-04
22:51:16, Wed
INBOX
K. Anyway, 1 asked if it could have been DD...she wasn't sure.
She didn't mentionBT
23
DOJ-PROD-OOOO115
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC Type of Message Body
2016-05-05 INBOX Talked last night, will update you at some point today -
11:56:03, Thu from your schedule, sounds like the morning, while hard, is much
better than the afternoon, which will be impossible
And damn. You see weekly odate with D?
Hey good news, re that^^^J stuff, you should talk toj. For
sure, J has been informed of the situation in the past. _
Nice. At lunch with^|...
\U0001f636+H2865 _
Racing to my desk, grab lock bag, then off to wh.
Ooh. Fancy fancy.;)
May have to wait until wrap to hear all your stories. \U0001f636
How was the WH?
It was good. Regulatory options for^J
Talked with^, good info from him, thank you. Also advancing
|m travel, will try in the next month or so. Need to coordinate
as options with you all in a joint trip FAR better than without.
2016-05-05
18:43:47, Thu
2016-05-05
18:44:06, Thu
2016-05-05
18:44:27, Thu
2016-05-05
18:45:30, Thu
2016-05-05
18:46:01, Thu
2016-05-05
18:46:45, Thu
2016-05-05
18:47:49, Thu
2016-05-05
20:27:31, Thu
2016-05-05
20:48:03, Thu
INBOX
Sit room or oeob?
OUTBOX
Oeob. Just a lawyer group meeting.
INBOX
You going straight to DoJ?
OUTBOX
Yup. In ODAG'S car now.
INBOX
Wow!! Double fancy fancy.;)
INBOX
You realize you could have been in the CD4 SC's car...not as
pretigious but nicer.
OUTBOX
It is a lovely car.
INBOX
Do you have 5 secs for a call on MYE?
OUTBOX
No. In with andy
I'll call him this afternoon
2016-05-05
13:57:53, Thu
INBOX
2016-05-05
15:24:52, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-05-05
15:25:24, Thu
INBOX
2016-05-05
15:29:05, Thu
INBOX
2016-05-05
16:54:23, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-05-05
16:58:06, Thu
INBOX
2016-05-05
17:00:28, Thu
INBOX
2016-05-05
18:41:52, Thu
INBOX
2016-05-05
18:42:58, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-05-05
18:43:34, Thu
INBOX
24
DOJ-PROD-OOOO116
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
2016-05-05
20:48:21, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-05-05
20:52:14, Thu
INBOX
2016-05-05
20:52:29, Thu
INBOX
2016-05-05
20:53:13, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-05-05
20:53:33, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-05-05
20:54:02, Thu
INBOX
2016-05-05
20:54:18, Thu
INBOX
2016-05-05
20:54:19, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-05-05
20:54:51, Thu
INBOX
2016-05-05
20:56:46, Thu
INBOX
2016-05-05
23:04:19, Thu
INBOX
2016-05-05
23:07:48, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-05-05
23:08:18, Thu
INBOX
2016-05-05
23:10:25, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-05-05
23:10:48, Thu
INBOX
2016-05-05
23:13:44, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-05-05
23:16:16, Thu
INBOX
2016-05-06
00:36:08, Fri
INBOX
2016-05-06
00:37:51, Fri
INBOX
2016-05-06
00:38:08, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-05-06
00:41:00, Fri
INBOX
2016-05-06
00:42:11, Fri
OUTBOX
Also, andy going to want to meet with just you and Bill tomorrow.
Will explain later. _ _
Ok. Bill now going to wrap at request of He has the info -
CNN breaking fbi has interviewed aides quietly at fbi building,
specifically Huma _
Ok re mtg
Just saw it on cnn.
Also be by the phone btwn 530 and 6. Andy wants to meet with
you and bill. _
That's what I was wanting to call and tell you
Ok. Bill will be there at wrap
All the same stuff we have been talking about. Ec, letter to icig, etc
Ok - thinking through what we need to do?
Bill just stopped by and told me same. \n\nYou're good at your job.
\u263a _
Chat before you go?
I haven't been to my desk in like 9 hours. Let me just quickly check
email and try to get out of here.
Talking to Bill in the hall
Np. Needed a phone number, just found it.
K. Just finished.
Jim locked himself out. I've been waiting with him. Headed to my
office now.
K. Hit me on lync
called so need to cal
him back.
Oh. Called
Oh. Called Huma's atty called just afterwards, he's talking
to her and calling back. _
Fun
Yeah. Wonder if they're raising hell about the media stuff. All
seemed very pro-Clinton camp _
Agreed.
25
DOJ-PROD-OOOO117
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
2016-05-06
00:42:35, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-05-06
00:42:56, Fri
INBOX
2016-05-06
00:44:39, Fri
2016-05-06
01:15:15, Fri
2016-05-06
01:17:03, Fri
2016-05-06
01:19:16, Fri
2016-05-06
01:19:45, Fri
2016-05-06
02:26:14, Fri
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
2016-05-06
02:52:58, Fri
2016-05-06
03:14:49, Fri
2016-05-06
08:52:58, Fri
2016-05-06
09:01:30, Fri
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
2016-05-06
09:06:19, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-05-06
09:08:13, Fri
2016-05-06
09:08:18, Fri
INBOX
OUTBOX
Body _
Not gonna be charged isn't anyone at the fbi, that's for sure
I might disagree slightly
Okay. Not anyone informed at the fbi.
Ha re your first 1026
Also, Andy's conference room is too big. Way too big.^ •
J|\n\nLeave the monitor wall in place. Too expensive to change.
Move where he was sitting 15-20 closer to the screens. Liberate
the remaining space. \n\nlt's too big. \n\nAnd it may be $$, but it's
ridiculously too big.£^^^jj^|
No way to change the room. The table alone was^H. (You can't
repeat that!) No, instead it just means we now have to get a small
conference table for his actual office, so that he can actually have a
meet ing that is intimate. _
Does^H go to all the wraps, or was he sitting in for Eric?
Sitting in for Eric now.
Eric essentially done?
And yes, re the room. But^H an idiot.
26
DOJ-PROD-OOOO118
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2016-05-06
09:08:29, Fri
OUTBOX
Yes. Leaves next week.
2016-05-06
09:09:01, Fri
INBOX
Ridiculous re the room. A wildly costly mistake.
2016-05-06
09:09:18, Fri
INBOX
NO one with sense questioned it?
2016-05-06
09:10:04, Fri
OUTBOX
1 have no idea. Claim was something big enough for the weekly sac
svtc. So for one 30 minute mtg a week.
2016-05-06
10:31:19, Fri
OUTBOX
Ooh, and my office is cleared out. Need to ask my IT friends to put
a computer in there for me...
2016-05-06
OUTBOX
10:35:38, Fri
There's a meeting at 1:30 I'd really like to attend.
2016-05-06
10:36:51, Fri
OUTBOX
*Might* go in on Saturday. Will have to see.
2016-05-06
10:37:54, Fri
INBOX
I've gotta go in this weekend, if only for a couple of hours
2016-05-06
12:12:21, Fri
INBOX
War gaming with Moffa. Much to run past you.
2016-05-06
12:16:14, Fri
OUTBOX
Have a 10, but after that I'm free. Maybe we can grab a cup then
powwow in your ofc.
2016-05-06
12:26:36, Fri
INBOX
How long is your 10? have a 10 as well. Probably 45 min, def over
by 11.
2016-05-06
12:29:10, Fri
OUTBOX
Yeah, probably 45 for me too.
2016-05-06
12:30:48, Fri
OUTBOX
Possibly. Just depends on what time 1 get in.
2016-05-06
INBOX
Ok. 1 have a 9 anyway, would have to be fast at 9:40. No worries
13:01:12, Fri
either a wav. i
2016-05-06
21:07:29, Fri
OUTBOX
Andy on the phone with Bill right now permanently kicking Jones
out of the meeting. You're welcome.
2016-05-06
21:09:16, Fri
INBOX
And buttressing the decision, remind me side comments from him.
2016-05-06
21:09:31, Fri
INBOX
Did.you show the^^^^^^^J email?
2016-05-06
21:09:31, Fri
OUTBOX
And you're about to be sent the D's press statement. Just to you
bill and moffa.
2016-05-06
21:10:39, Fri
OUTBOX
1 did. He chuckled. And said you're the only person I'm the Bureau
who could successfully use jaunty.
2016-05-06
23:22:55, Fri
OUTBOX
Just had a better idea. I'll ask andy this weekend, and if it's okay
with him. I'll sent up the question for you. Will check this whole
strategy with andy.
2016-05-06
23:25:58, Fri
INBOX
Not following
27
DOJ-PROD-OOOO119
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of l\
2016-05-06
23:33:37, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-05-06
23:41:14, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-05-06
23:41:44, Fri
INBOX
2016-05-07
01:17:14, Sat
OUTBOX
2016-05-07
01:24:49, Sat
INBOX
2016-05-07
02:20:39, Sat
INBOX
2016-05-07
10:39:32, Sat
INBOX
2016-05-07
10:41:02, Sat
OUTBOX
2016-05-07
10:46:34, Sat
OUTBOX
2016-05-07
10:48:51, Sat
INBOX
2016-05-07
14:07:33, Sat
INBOX
2016-05-07
14:07:43, Sat
INBOX
2016-05-07
14:07:52, Sat
INBOX
2016-05-08
13:43:35, Sun
INBOX
2016-05-08
13:45:46, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-05-08
14:34:30, Sun
INBOX
2016-05-08
23:04:31, Sun
INBOX
2016-05-08
23:21:28, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-05-08
23:27:24, Sun
INBOX
2016-05-08
23:50:01, Sun
OUTBOX
I'll ask you, in front of the D, "Pete, I apologize for putting you on
the spot, but I know you shared with andy some of the comments
you've been hearing from folks, I think it would be valuable for the
D to know them." _
Can't right now but will shortly.
Np. Have some time on all this.
And hey^^^ call the field office. HQ isn't going to be able to
draft a damn search warrant, the field is. Call an ausa on duty for
chrissake. _
No kidding...but he never knew shit about the Bu anyway
Talked to Bill just now
Think I'm going to call Laufman this morning. Want details
specifically on WHO is making these calls. Then call^f and talk
about what they did in PC investigation land. _
Good plan.
Don't let that pompous boob push you around either.
I won't - he hasn't really tried to do that. He's largely absent.
Work call?
(Me with you, now? (
Just got done talking to Bill
check out the wp articles I emailed.
Read a Clinton one.
When is Andy out next?
Turn on nbc
What was it?
Guccifer. Sleazy Romanian.
They ALL are.
28
DOJ-PROD-0000120
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
2016-05-09
00:02:52, Mon
INBOX
1
2016-05-09
00:23:58, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-05-09
00:25:41, Mon
INBOX
2016-05-09
10:41:42, Mon
INBOX
2016-05-09
10:42:52, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-05-09
10:47:00, Mon
INBOX
2016-05-09
11:10:54, Mon
INBOX
2016-05-09
14:32:20, Mon
INBOX
2016-05-09
22:01:27, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-05-09
22:03:04, Mon
INBOX
2016-05-09
22:03:31, Mon
INBOX
2016-05-10
00:09:03, Tue
INBOX
2016-05-10
00:20:16, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-05-10
01:13:54, Tue
INBOX
2016-05-10
01:40:20, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-05-10
01:41:58, Tue
INBOX
2016-05-10
01:44:36, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-05-10
01:45:23, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-05-10
01:48:58, Tue
OUTBOX
Body
Funny to watch and think of
No wonder he's a brusque as he is...and those
Roma nians aren't e ven the gypsies... _
Seriously, I kind of hate them. (I'm sure^^J fine). But they have
the crookedness of the Russians with the entitledness of the
Italians. Yuck.
Ha. Never really dealt with them
Hey, work related, with Bill out, does Andy want Jones bringing
MYE daily bullets? Or email from us to I don't see
how we don't include him. And I think I def bootleg you in case he
Fs it up _
I'm sure he doesn't care, plus I can't imagine that Jones will sit in
I guess. Another thing to add to the to do list.
Don't have anything until my
910 mye staff meeting.
Walking to desk
I'm at my desk, hiding behind the yellow "away" light
Jon got an eras machine last week. Wondering if I want to do the
same. \U0001f615 _
When are you free tomorrow Ito talk with Jon about speech? 1?
Not sure. Will let you know,
And talkedto^^^^Barmer evening. \n\nConcluded by saying I
cannot overstate to you the sense of urgency about wanting to
logically and effectively conclude this investigation.
Meet with Jon at 2 tomorrow?
We have Bowdich at 2:30. Can you do earlier? Or any time after
3:45. And/or come to Bowdich with us
Don't want to do that. Let me look.
I could do 1:30-2:30. Do you guys need to prep for that at all?
Wait but you both have your 1:00.
29
DOJ-PROD-0000121
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
2016-05-10
01:49:37, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-05-10
01:49:43, Tue
INBOX
2016-05-10
01:50:28, Tue
INBOX
2016-05-10
INBOX
01:51:04, Tue
2016-05-10
01:54:45, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-05-10
01:54:50, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-05-10
02:10:59, Tue
INBOX
2016-05-10
09:01:11, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-05-10
09:17:36, Tue
INBOX
2016-05-10
09:20:45, Tue
INBOX
2016-05-10
09:31:36, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-05-10
13:30:37, Tue
INBOX
2016-05-10
15:35:18, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-05-10
16:22:13, Tue
INBOX
2016-05-10
16:23:04, Tue
INBOX
2016-05-10
17:00:39, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-05-10
18:30:00, Tue
INBOX
2016-05-10
18:41:49, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-05-10
20:26:51, Tue
INBOX
2016-05-10
20:30:24, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-05-10
20:30:51, Tue
INBOX
Body
Could also do 330 to 430
Prep? Please. :D\n\nl:30 works. We're skipping 1 and sending our
ASCs _
Told you if the D is stressed he's got the goddamn Allstars behind
him. _
330 I'll tell you my impressions of the ADD...
;)+H3342 _
Ha. We'll see. 1:30 it is then.
Tell jon?
I did, see invite.
And I never got an invite for today.
Hi. Really? Let me go check.
Get it just now?
And yes, I did.
Going to go do my 4B career board
Are you still going to LV next week? You know^^^f and
Laufman are going, right? _
No and yes. \U0001f621
Because they're dedicated to this case. \U0001f612 How did that
comejjo?
Overheard Plan to tell Dd as grist for his call to Carlin to get
them to take it seriously.
I neither told nor invited Jones
I know. #1: you need to find out how he knew. #2: I talked to Andy
about it. He's out. Permanently. He will discuss with Bill.
Convo with Jon went badly in that I'm not sure he
understood me a+H3379nd three people walked up etc et. \n\n\n
Writing bullets for Jones to give to EAD for Andy. Unless you think
there's a better routing for it. _
I really don't know.
I'm happy to send straight to you...
30
DOJ-PROD-0000122
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2016-05-10
20:31:36, Tue
OUTBOX
1 wouldn't for now. Wait for andy to reset...
2016-05-10
20:33:01, Tue
INBOX
These will all generate Qs from Jones
2016-05-10
20:33:38, Tue
OUTBOX
Let me ask andy. Hold please.
2016-05-10
20:34:02, Tue
INBOX
Thx
2016-05-10
20:35:38, Tue
OUTBOX
Direct to me per DD
2016-05-10
20:36:52, Tue
INBOX
Done. On the way, call me with Qs. On high side, you want unet
instead?
2016-05-10
21:18:31, Tue
INBOX
Wp article out
2016-05-11
00:00:30, Wed
INBOX
Just talked to Eric with Q from Andy/D (maybe D)
2016-05-11
00:09:18, Wed
OUTBOX
Eric Smith?
2016-05-11
00:10:12, Wed
OUTBOX
Can you tell me the q?
2016-05-11
00:11:05, Wed
OUTBOX
Got it. Wonder where that is coming from?...
2016-05-11
00:11:45, Wed
INBOX
Andy or D
2016-05-11
00:12:05, Wed
INBOX
1 didn't respond with my immediate answer, "of course we did"
2016-05-11
00:12:41, Wed
INBOX
1 don't know where it's coming from. Assume Andy either read
update and/or discussed with D
2016-05-11
00:13:41, Wed
INBOX
Your mission. Agent Page, should you choose to accept it...
2016-05-11
00:14:24, Wed
OUTBOX
Obviously I'll find out what 1 can tomorrow...
2016-05-11
00:49:01, Wed
OUTBOX
Forgot to ask, did that^^^J issue come up at wrap? Because
Paarman (acting ead) asked andy for a status update, saying Bob
had inquired, but 1 could have sworn Andy mentioned to Bill...
2016-05-11
00:50:52, Wed
INBOX
A) not tracking -1 don't attend any cd wraps (Jones does both
jobs). Not my section, 1 don't think? \n\n(and Paarman is acting
ead?!?!)
2016-05-11
00:51:16, Wed
OUTBOX
Just covered wrap.
2016-05-11
00:51:55, Wed
OUTBOX
Yeah, my q didn't make sense. Disregard.
2016-05-11
01:09:01, Wed
INBOX
Sorry, a cia buddy called looking for me to put in a good word with
Jen
31
DOJ-PROD-0000123
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2016-05-11
01:11:28, Wed
INBOX
Your q made sense. I've just missed Jones' meetings today.
2016-05-11
01:17:54, Wed
OUTBOX
Yeah, no kidding. Except 1 have like a thousand page litigation
outline that^H put together that 1 need to review tonight.
2016-05-11
01:18:51, Wed
OUTBOX
And among the list of 1000 things 1 need to do is call 1500 or
whomever to figure how to work 324 mail...
2016-05-11
01:26:14, Wed
INBOX
Is your 324mail password messed up? Or you just need a tutorial?
2016-05-11
01:27:14, Wed
OUTBOX
1 never set up an account. Think 1 need them to do something to
link my token to the account. But 1 don't really know how to do it.
2016-05-11
01:31:48, Wed
INBOX
Oh. They do. And 1 have no idea what that is. 1 think it's already
linked to your rsa, but you've got to set up a PIN.
2016-05-11
01:32:27, Wed
OUTBOX
1 figure it's probably not the same as my eras pin. Maybe 1 should
just try tomorrow...
2016-05-11
01:32:52, Wed
INBOX
It's not
2016-05-11
01:33:06, Wed
INBOX
I've got to get am eras. \n\nProbably\n\nMaybe
2016-05-11
09:39:48, Wed
INBOX
And reading a NYT article on State placing classified in
unclassified systems reminded me of my irritation about the brief
yesterday.
2016-05-11
18:10:03, Wed
INBOX
Have to go write MYE bullets for Jones \U0001f612\n\nYour end of
day ones will be better...
2016-05-11
21:34:06, Wed
INBOX
Hey def have Andy talk to John/George about urgency if he hasn't.
1 spoke to David,can explain later, tried to communicate the same
thing to him. Got a "we're waiting on next version of affidavit from
you." 1 am certain there are other things that can be getting
prepped.
2016-05-11
21:41:43, Wed
OUTBOX
Dd calling state now
2016-05-11
21:42:41, Wed
INBOX
Ooh. Want to hear about it! You already talk to J?
2016-05-11
21:43:21, Wed
INBOX
And crap I've got to go in 30 or so
2016-05-11
21:44:06, Wed
OUTBOX
Cancelled m to sit in on this.
2016-05-11
21:46:31, Wed
INBOX
Nice. Call me, obviously. The MOA is done/final (State OGC is
good), just need Jones to sign it tomorrow morning.
2016-05-11
21:47:23, Wed
INBOX
No word re anything frornBm|
2016-05-11
21:48:14, Wed
OUTBOX
Are the two cds identified in any other way?
32
DOJ-PROD-0000124
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
2016-05-11
21:48:18, Wed
OUTBOX
2016-05-11
21:48:27, Wed
OUTBOX
2016-05-11
21:51:02, Wed
INBOX
2016-05-11
21:51:38, Wed
INBOX
2016-05-11
21:51:53, Wed
OUTBOX
2016-05-11
21:52:14, Wed
INBOX
2016-05-11
21:52:40, Wed
INBOX
2016-05-11
21:53:00, Wed
INBOX
2016-05-11
21:53:03, Wed
OUTBOX
2016-05-11
21:53:20, Wed
INBOX
2016-05-11
21:53:41, Wed
INBOX
2016-05-11
21:53:51, Wed
INBOX
2016-05-11
21:53:57, Wed
OUTBOX
2016-05-11
21:54:02, Wed
OUTBOX
2016-05-11
21:54:39, Wed
INBOX
2016-05-11
21:55:01, Wed
INBOX
2016-05-11
21:55:30, Wed
INBOX
2016-05-11
21:57:48, Wed
OUTBOX
2016-05-11
21:58:43, Wed
INBOX
2016-05-11
21:59:57, Wed
OUTBOX
2016-05-11
22:00:36, Wed
INBOX
2016-05-11
22:00:42, Wed
OUTBOX
Body
I'm not going.
So they haven't heard from her yet?
Just by date of delivery
With a cover LHM from me
is calling us back tomorrow.
Not clear if they have heard from her. David was unaware of any
contact as of 4:30
After he researches, or you weren't able to talk to him?
I left an email but he is returning from twin cities.
We spoke to him. He will have answers tomorrow.
I hope to hear later tonight, def tomorrow at 11 mtg with them
Nice. Send thanks to Andy
And call me re Laufman
Oh he's going to ask for update before then.
I will when I can.
That's fine. I will call now as well
That's fine. I will call now as well
And re call, got it. Just atmospherics on different perspective.
1^^^^ phone went straight to vm. Left message
Dd wants email direct to him when/if you hear about|^|. Cc me
obviously.
Will do.p
Great.
Hey just sent you short email, can you check for tone?
He called usss today, will call Cia tomorrow. Have much to discuss
with you later. But will probably be much later.
33
DOJ-PROD-0000125
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2016-05-11
22:00:45, Wed
OUTBOX
10-4
2016-05-11
22:01:37, Wed
INBOX
Why USSS?
2016-05-11
22:02:23, Wed
INBOX
O:: Before or
after is fine.
2016-05-11
22:07:07, Wed
OUTBOX
Gotta run
2016-05-11
22:11:06, Wed
INBOX
K. Me too. Will be on cell
2016-05-11
23:27:28, Wed
INBOX
Can answer Qs here if urgent or will be 8:30 (!) when done
2016-05-11
23:27:31, Wed
OUTBOX
Andy is PISSED. Can't believe (even though he can) that doj is just
going along with it all. Tried calling John and George but no
answer.
2016-05-11
23:27:55, Wed
INBOX
m is refusing
2016-05-11
23:28:18, Wed
OUTBOX
m is the only real prosecutor.
2016-05-11
23:54:20, Wed
OUTBOX
1 am. Going out with j^H now to get food.
2016-05-12
02:30:36, Thu
OUTBOX
BTW fwiw, K still in the ofc with me.
2016-05-12
11:08:54, Thu
OUTBOX
Totally off topic, but I'm kind of bummed: Randy offered to take
Andy to the offsite using a Blackhawk on Monday. It's easier for
him to have ^ drive, be it's relatively closer from here. Wah wah.
2016-05-12
11:11:37, Thu
INBOX
And I'll start percolating^^! up next week. Figure a week or two
to discuss, then calendar. Though honestly 1 wonder if it's stupid to
_ even consider before the 15th _
INBOX Two days is doable, though, assuming it's not the week he wants to
make the speech
OUTBOX Yeah, it probably is. And there's a strong risk andy will say you're
_too imp ortant to the ca se and nee d to stay here ._
OUTBOX yeah, but it might end up being him and I and a hunch of
others too, and I don't really want that. That's what happened last
time.
2016-05-12
12:32:52, Thu
INBOX
1 think 1 need to excuse my team and talk to doj, again, his morning
at 11 about timeliness
2016-05-12
13:06:57, Thu
INBOX
Talking with Jon about DoJ. Would like you here - how far out are
you?
2016-05-12
13:09:40, Thu
OUTBOX
Probably be in the ofc by 9:30 or so.
2016-05-12
13:10:45, Thu
INBOX
Ok. Let me know. I've got a hard stop (for Jones \U0001f612) at 10
2016-05-12
11:12:08, Thu
2016-05-12
11:14:20, Thu
2016-05-12
11:18:04, Thu
34
DOJ-PROD-0000126
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
2016-05-12
13:28:09, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-05-12
16:07:24, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-05-12
16:10:02, Thu
INBOX
2016-05-12
16:15:35, Thu
INBOX
2016-05-12
20:57:57, Thu
INBOX
2016-05-12
21:03:50, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-05-12
21:05:48, Thu
INBOX
2016-05-12
21:08:34, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-05-12
22:28:44, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-05-12
22:46:24, Thu
INBOX
2016-05-12
22:48:06, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-05-12
22:49:41, Thu
INBOX
2016-05-12
23:39:39, Thu
INBOX
2016-05-12
23:50:01, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-05-12
23:53:23, Thu
INBOX
2016-05-12
23:54:25, Thu
INBOX
2016-05-12
23:59:27, Thu
INBOX
2016-05-13
00:00:36, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-05-13
00:01:11, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-05-13
00:24:35, Fri
OUTBOX
Body
Want me to come straight there?
Hey need to go meet with NCOS on the uco stuff.
Updates for you
Will be in my office (just above you, I think) - sending a UC to 1:00
so I have a bit more flexibility
Hi.^H coming through
With what?
Sitting in CES with them overnight writing the PSEU form so it's
ready tomorrow morning for Dana and George to sign. Dana is
ready. _
Good. F-ing finally.
Holy cow are you still talking?!
Just finished. Will call. On the way out Eric asked (he suggested no)
if we needed the meeting tomorrow afternoon
Did you ask Andy if he still wanted to meet tomorrow?
I did not. I had left when Eric caught me. I told Eric I deferred to
Andy about whether or not we needed to meet. We did not talk
about what we planned to tell the D on Mon.
Spoke and relayed Andy's message. Told him Andy was
relaying to Carlin. Richard said he'd wait to hear from on high.
Carlin and George are definitely going to have to message down
Can I send that to Andy.
Think I need an eras....
And just got a mtg cancel for mtg tomorrow afternoon with Andy
Remind story
Yup. And Eric cancelling eve mtg too.
Tried tonight but didn't reach him. Will try in am.
Hey forgot to ask if you mentioned the whole special counsel thing
to andy?
35
DOJ-PROD-0000127
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
2016-05-13
00:37:41, Fri
2016-05-13
00:38:12, Fri
2016-05-13
00:39:29, Fri
2016-05-13
00:39:59, Fri
2016-05-13
00:40: 35, Fri
2016-05-13
00:41:11, Fri
2016-05-13
00:41:31, Fri
2016-05-13
10:41:31, Fri
2016-05-13
10:42:36, Fri
2016-05-13
10:43:13, Fri
2016-05-13
10:44:12, Fri
2016-05-13
10:46:03, Fri
2016-05-13
10:46:06, Fri
2016-05-13
10:52:59, Fri
2016-05-13
12:38:25, Fri
2016-05-13
12:38:42, Fri
2016-05-13
12:42:36, Fri
Type of Message
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
Body
Sleeper was in there when I arrived
Yup. I'm pissed. Especially be he knows Eric and^^J are tight.
Soft power.
Yeah, I know. I already called Jim and sent an email to trisha.
\U0001f612 _
See?!? Perfect
I walked through my convo with DoJ. Got more info ffomU
about Laufman. It's a problem. Told Andy that, too.
What info?
Who was your poc to get an eras? Or did you just get JG's?
I did just get^| I wonder what they asked him when he went to
turn in his property. Just ask jon, no? _
Yeah, that's what I'm going to do.
Talked to^^^f last night, btw. Fie spoke to^J. Shockingly, she
did not sound surprised about the subpoenas, said she would
accept service. \U0001f612 _
Still saying no about the laptops, but focused on Mills'. Fie said
they were moving forward on that front as well. Helpfully,
obliquely told/reminded her pet her prior conments that if she was
going to call anyone, to do that soon. \U0001f612 Because we're
just TFIAT bad. _
Of, not pet
Your calendar isn't SO bad today....Jones has his meeting
scheduled over Eric's farewell. Are you going to that? _
I am going, yes.
Let me see what Jones is thinking. Suppose I cam show up late.
There will be more than 30 minutes of speechifying. I'm sure
2016-05-13
12:42:52, Fri
2016-05-13
14:36:20, Fri
2016-05-13
14:57:44, Fri
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
I'm sure.
Talking in my office with
Just finished. Need to catch andy.
36
DOJ-PROD-0000128
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
2016-05-15
18:30:50, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-05-15
18:32:07, Sun
INBOX
2016-05-15
18:32:43, Sun
INBOX
2016-05-15
18:32:52, Sun
INBOX
2016-05-15
20:21:14, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-05-15
20:24:05, Sun
INBOX
2016-05-15
20:26:09, Sun
INBOX
2016-05-15
20:26:45, Sun
INBOX
2016-05-15
20:27:28, Sun
INBOX
2016-05-15
20:33:11, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-05-15
20:40:03, Sun
INBOX
2016-05-15
20:58:05, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-05-15
20:59:49, Sun
INBOX
2016-05-15
21:03:33, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-05-15
21:07:38, Sun
INBOX
2016-05-15
21:10:17, Sun
OUTBOX
I'm thinking about not going with Andy tomorrow, going into to
work but only working on uco policy and house stuff. I'm very torn.
\U0001f612 _
You should definitely go before Andy
leaves. You'll have another chance, but the irons hot now. Flip side,
I really want you (and him, but at least one of you) at D brief.
Work-wise, probably smarter to go in, I guess.
Take the helicopter next time.;)
Yes. ^ just texted. Dd flying with the DAG on the bird. So he'll be
back for mye. So if there are extra seats. I'll join, if not. I'll come in.
That's totally cool.
Where do you leave from, Reagan?
Troop configuration sits 11 (if you're taking the Blackhawk) but no
idea how configured. 8, no problem. Take out seats and you can
cram about 20 all soothed together (but that's SUPER tight). Is^
going?_
Scootched not soothed. It is NOT soothed.
First time in a blackhawk? Flelicopter?
Never been in a blackhawk, or any helicopter at all KalSpMSSiiil
Well, I really hope you can go. There's got to be enough room -
even if the DAG takes +2, +2 detail guys, and Andy, that's only 6.
When will you know? _
Tonight? Not sure
Saw your email. Waiting to do something until I get it "officially" -
or can I use your email for that? We're going to have to go to NSD.
I think Bill calling George is the right place to start, then I can
follow up with
Wait. Bill said cd will take the lead.
Sigh. I suppose he'll relay that eventually. \U0001f612
Fie will.
37
DOJ-PROD-0000129
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
2016-05-15
21:22:31, Sun
INBOX
2016-05-15
21:38:52, Sun
INBOX
2016-05-15
22:46:18, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-05-15
22:46:44, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-05-15
22:55:06, Sun
INBOX
2016-05-15
22:56:05, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-05-15
23:00:39, Sun
INBOX
2016-05-15
23:59:40, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-05-16
00:49:01, Mon
INBOX
2016-05-16
01:06:08, Mon
INBOX
2016-05-16
01:07:10, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-05-16
01:08:56, Mon
INBOX
2016-05-16
01:09:21, Mon
OUTBOX
And I'm going to ping Jim R tomorrow (or whenever I get it) to say
hey, per D's request, we've put quite a bit of thought into it,
including coming up with this, Andy noted you were collecting
comments, how would you like them. _
Well, he hasn't. I'm just going to email him and see if he wants an
update from last week either tonight or tomorrow morning before
he goes upstairs. _
I'm over my email limit so can't send right now. It's utterly freezing
outside. Sucks. _ _
DAG detail saying only room for Andy. ^ is checking with her
staff.
Oof. That sucks. And bullsh*t, unless it's a smaller helicopter. Is it
DOJ's or ours? If you cant go. I'll take you to lunch and make
helicopter noises. ;)\n\nl just did a mass cull down on 324mail.
Talking to Bill at 7:45. Did some open source
research, no way we get that data on our own. _
I know. It has to be nsd.
I need some clarifying data - just retention, right? While it might be
helpful to put in Petraeus, Hitselberger, that's only to show they
are different, ie, involve transmittal to another person. He just
wants fact patterns where it was only retention, not disclosure,
right? And taking graviman literally, list will not include more
serious cases/disclosures which are more than retention.
Yes, that's what I would say.
Just finished with Bill
Talked to
Bill for about an hour. He mentioned email, said he would send
(though he hasn't yet). He had a slightly different take than I did
but we'll get there. His primary concern is asking DoJ in such a way
that they respond straight to the D (which I can see happening)
without us getting a chance to review for accuracy / spin.
Insist it go through the DD. Then I'll give it to you.
Well I think we start by trying to insist it go thru CD. We'll see. I just
envision them being whiny about it unless they have something
already written. _
They won't. I guarantee it.
38
DOJ-PROD-0000130
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
2016-05-16
01:10:10, Mon
INBOX
2016-05-16
01:10:33, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-05-16
01:11:00, Mon
INBOX
2016-05-16
01:11:09, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-05-16
01:11:42, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-05-16
01:12:06, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-05-16
01:12:48, Mon
INBOX
2016-05-16
01:13:08, Mon
INBOX
2016-05-16
01:13:17, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-05-16
01:14:00, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-05-16
01:14:38, Mon
INBOX
2016-05-16
01:16:04, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-05-16
01:16:27, Mon
INBOX
2016-05-16
01:17:16, Mon
INBOX
2016-05-16
01:17:19, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-05-16
01:20:02, Mon
INBOX
2016-05-16
01:23:51, Mon
OUTBOX
Hope springs eternal. I suppose I could ask
on the DL
And yes, obviously I agree about it going thru cd first. Was just
saying if they balk, there's no way rybicki wouldn't insist on it
coming to us first. _
Is that something doj would ordinarily keep good records of? Or
will this be a lift? _ _
If there are so few that someone like^H would literally be able to
recall them then you have much bigger problems.
Description might be hard. But I guess we'll see.
The fbi can come up with description
20 years is a long time...
I'd like to make a suggestion though. I DO NOT think you should
ask^^^J. I think Bill should ask George. is just going to
bitch and moan. George sees the d three times a week. He is not
going to say no. _
They won't be able to do that. No way. But let THEM come back to
rybicki about what they can or can't do. _
Fine but then George tasks them and they ask me...when am I
supposed to mention it? Seeing as how I own this program and all.
Pete. I'm trying to save you some crap from them. Don't get your
back up about it. When they ask you, you talk about it. What's the
big deal? All they are going to do when you tell them is wait to
hear from on high. So all I'm saying is start there.
Look, I totally get what you're saying and agree with you. Just
trying to figure out how best to own my program _
Ha. \U0001f60a See, my back's not up. Just trying to find the best
way to play this.
With this one, coming from the d, just let it trickle down from
higher. Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if George hears it from andy in
the morning. _
Sounds smart
Haven't heard from|
\U0001f612
Looks like I'm coming to work tomorrow.
39
DOJ-PROD-0000131
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
2016-05-16
01:25:24, Mon
Type of Message
INBOX
Also, remind me story Bill had about
Bob Anderson. \n\nThat really sucks. I'm sorry. You'll have more
chances, for sure
2016-05-16
01:36:26, Mon
OUTBOX
(Though in think I'm leaving "coop site" on
my wipe board and just working out of ofc tomorrow.
2016-05-16
01:37:4 8, Mon
2016-05-16
01:41:42, Mon
2016-05-16
01:43:55, Mon
2016-05-16
01:44:12, Mon
2016-05-16
01:44:36, Mon
2016-05-16
01:45:16 , Mon
2016-05-16
01:54:01, Mon
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
Jm is out. You can also work out of PS's office tomorrow.
your phone rings off the hook. I need some
uninterrupted work and Internet research time.
I'll unplug my phone\U0001f636
|j out tomorrow?
Yes. Though I presume^ will be there.
Your call. You're welcome to it.
2016-05-16
02:15:08, Mon
2016-05-16
12:19:55, Mon
2016-05-16
12:45:19, Mon
2016-05-16
13:00:41, Mon
2016-05-16
16:19:43, Mon
2016-05-16
21:22:22, Mon
2016-05-16
21:24:03, Mon
2016-05-16
21:24:27, Mon
2016-05-16
21:24:40, Mon
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
And I'm regretting letting ALL of my UCs go to LV. Trusted to
check that but my mistake for not double checking.
And finally almost to HQ. I'll double check.my calendar (an OCA
mtg this morning i think got moved) but truly I think my office will
be open all day if you want to use it. _
Done with 830....will call from desk if you'll be in car for 5
Pulling in in 4
Hey done with staff mtg.
Calling^! to get info. Just got vm. You in wrap?
Thought it went well.
Just left.
Be down in a minute.
40
DOJ-PROD-0000132
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2016-05-17
00:50:47, Tue
INBOX
otta talk toshortly. Haven't heard from Mike.
Curious to see what Andy and George's convo is about same topic.
2016-05-17
01:27:44, Tue
INBOX
Don't read email then. It's^^^J response citing
USAM 9-19.220
2016-05-17
02:01:23, Tue
OUTBOX
I'm not following his email at all. Whatever, will just deal with it
tomorrow.
2016-05-17
02:03:24, Tue
INBOX
1 think your initial cite may have misdirected to 9-19.221 rather
than 9-19.220...
2016-05-17
02:06:22, Tue
INBOX
Nevermind, I'm wrong. We're interested in documentary materials,
not privileged ones. \n\nAnd I'M not even an atty
2016-05-17
INBOX
10:17:24, Tue
HI 1 need DoJ and NSLB to get me an answer, because I'm
briefing everyone there are different options available. And the 28
CFR guidance seems problematic from a warrant perspective.
2016-05-17
OUTBOX
1 don't think it is. Plus, it's just policy.
10:25:03, Tue
2016-05-17
INBOX
28 CFR is not just policy. But 1 think there's a path through it as you
10:27:26, Tue
2016-05-17
10:35:58, Tue
OUTBOX
Yes, this is true. But let's be honest, it's not like they've pointed to
the cfr as the reason. So let them come up with something.
2016-05-17
10:43:03, Tue
INBOX
They haven't pointed to it because they haven't done the
research!!! But when they finally do, presumably before a meeting,
they will, and we need to have a response lined up.\n\nAnd hi. 1
2016-05-17
10:43:47, Tue
OUTBOX
1 also hate this case. And it's not even mine.
2016-05-17
10:44:39, Tue
OUTBOX
1 have all of the stress and will get none of the acknowledgement
for being on the team. But whatever.
2016-05-17
10:47:08, Tue
INBOX
Ok that last statement isn't fair.
2016-05-17
10:48:05, Tue
INBOX
You are on the team, you do a tremendous amount of work on it.
2016-05-17
10:49:17, Tue
INBOX
When Andy called last week to discuss, he called you and me.
41
DOJ-PROD-0000133
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
2016-05-17
10:4 9:54, Tue
2016-05-17
11:00:53, Tue
Type of Message
OUTBOX
INBOX
No, I work for him. I'm 100% not on the team. Most of "the team"
w ouldn't k now who I am. _ _
I, and to a lesser extent Jon, know exactly what you do. I thinkH|j
is ambivalent, for a lot of reasons you understand. \n\nAnd as you
said, you work for Andy. And you get exposure to and credit for a
billion other things the team never will. Just happens that this one
case is a big deal right now. It God willing won't be in a couple of
months. If you want to tdy out you could be full time in a New York
minute.\n\nl'm trying to understand the underlying source of your
frustration - it's across everything that came up yesterday - my
miscommunication as you drove in about talking to^j to start the
SW conversation, about my interaction with Bill about Jones, now
about this, \n\nl think it's a struggle with recognition vs result, with
soft power. And I worry a bit that your broad consideration of it is
getting all distilled down and played out, fairly or unfairly, over
2016-05-17
11:01:07, Tue
INBOX
Ok that may have been my longest text ever.
2016-05-17
13:13:58, Tue
OUTBOX
You in the ofc
2016-05-17
17:11:36, Tue
INBOX
Hey 1 came up to 7
2016-05-17
22:53:19, Tue
INBOX
Talked to^^J She said she wants to talk with you and Trisha
before the meeting with DoJ tomorrow.
2016-05-17
22:55:34, Tue
OUTBOX
She disagrees with my view?
2016-05-17
22:59:43, Tue
INBOX
No. Standby for email
2016-05-17
23:00:29, Tue
INBOX
Think just wants to understand.
2016-05-17
23:10:16, Tue
INBOX
The main thing^H mentioned in the conversation was whether
m thought the director and Deputy should be on the line,
because they were attorneys who thought that way. There was no
mention of 1 don't agree with Lisa. My sense was she wanted to
understand what you have read and thought, nothing more.
2016-05-17
23:11:27, Tue
OUTBOX
No way d or Dd should be on.
2016-05-18
INBOX
09:16:48, Wed
^Bill emailed last night wanting to meet at 7:15. Didn't
sav wh
42
DOJ-PROD-0000134
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
2016-05-18
10: 15:24 , Wed
2016-05-18
10:44:40, Wed
2016-05-18
10:45:12, Wed
2016-05-18
10:46:58, Wed
2016-05-18
10:48:34, Wed
2016-05-18
10:50:49, Wed
2016-05-18
11:43:51, Wed
Type of Message
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
2016-05-18
11:44:40, Wed
2016-05-18
11:45:02, Wed
2016-05-18
11:49:08, Wed
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
2016-05-18
11:49:31, Wed
2016-05-18
13:04:48, Wed
2016-05-18
15:57:15, Wed
2016-05-18
16:02:10, Wed
2016-05-18
16:51:55, Wed
2016-05-18
21:09:03, Wed
2016-05-18
21:09:26, Wed
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
Body
Just you
J
Yes just me with Bill
I'm sure it's all good.
I'm guessing some combination of the economic Espionage cases
on 60 Minutes and tc
Yeah, that makes sense. I'm glad he has you. And that he knows
how lucky he is that he does. _
I'm also frustrated that I have to spend three and a half hours in a
trp session for things that are already decided. We waste too much
time on this process. It's important to do, but not this long, and not
this c omplicated. _
HHl| I am so mad at^^^J right now. He's claiming
reimbursement for car for 14-28 April (Conf authorized 18-22),
lodging in Auckland 16-17 (Conf was in Wellington), m&IE in
Auckland 14-16.\n\nl mean wtf. Have some sense, man.
Do Not Let Him!
That's really outrageous.
I'm not going to. I've got to call him today. Since he didn't get
business, he's entitled to a delay in route of one night, 3/4 days
M&IE on each day. I'll let him explain that to me, though. \n\nThe
rental car, no.\n\nOh, this was all in conjunction with his wife.
Didn't use Carlson, "Contacted Carlson and determined there is no
contract carrier to Nz. Due to this fact, and to ensure my wife could
travel with me at am acceptable cost, I booked through other
means." _ _ _ i
In defense of his airfare, what he paid is much less than the Carlson
fare.
I DO NOT WANT TO ATTEND THIS\n\nGrump grump grump
You already leave? \n\nAlso, need to to let me in toH|
office
can only do 4 or any time later. You want to try for 430,
recognizing you have wrap at 5, or keep at 4? _
Give me a call when you're done, I am in hell
Andy headed up. Told him you sat in conference call
I made wrong decision on which meeting to attend. Read in was
HORRIBLE.
43
DOJ-PROD-0000135
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2016-05-18
21:09:32, Wed
INBOX
Wrong focus/level
2016-05-19
01:11:09, Thu
OUTBOX
Note the bcc
2016-05-19
01:14:34, Thu
INBOX
Fie didn't copy me (which is fine), which 1 think is a function of
editing he did after the fact. Would appreciate a bootleg (or show
me. I'll give back) just to fact check.\n\nAnd yes. We're wildly lucky
to have your support.
\U0001f636\U0001f636\U0001f636\U0001f636
2016-05-19
01:15:28, Thu
INBOX
And on the team ;)
2016-05-19
01:41:42, Thu
INBOX
\u263a\n\nWhat did you think of Bills email?
2016-05-19
01:53:22, Thu
OUTBOX
It was very nice of him to say, which is obviously why 1 sent it.
\U0001f636
2016-05-19
01:54:35, Thu
INBOX
Well, you saw my response!
\n\n\U0001f636\U0001f636\U0001f636 back at you
2016-05-19
01:55:57, Thu
OUTBOX
Got the briefing materials from ^^^J/trisha. They are WAAAAY
too long.
2016-05-19
01:59:33, Thu
INBOX
You gonna edit down or send back?
2016-05-19
02:01:02, Thu
OUTBOX
Edit down. It's very well written, just too detailed.
2016-05-19
02:08:38, Thu
INBOX
Illjjllll is Trishas ^^^^|?
2016-05-20
INBOX
DoJ playing games
02:21:12, Fri
withbinfo, and Andy playing into it. Whatever
2016-05-20
02:40:09, Fri
OUTBOX
1 know. I'll let him know to keep an eye out tomorrow, and let him
know that it's annoying and that you and need to review it
first for accuracy.
2016-05-20
02:41:03, Fri
INBOX
I'm sure someone will send us a copy.
2016-05-20
02:43:09, Fri
OUTBOX
You have every right to be frustrated. But this is partly DOJ'S
doing as well, with their refusal to do anything without hearing it
from on high. Flang tight. It's no reflection of you.
2016-05-20
02:44:49, Fri
INBOX
Yes. Just like^mi refusal to talk to us about interactions with
until George told Andy. Yes. Everyone learned all kinds of
lessons. Great support to the team. Thanks. Goodnight.
2016-05-20
02:47:20, Fri
INBOX
I'm sorry. This isn't fair to you. I'm angry and I'm venting to you as a
friend.
2016-05-20
02:47:45, Fri
INBOX
Let the work end play out as it will
44
DOJ-PROD-0000136
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2016-05-20
02:49:04, Fri
INBOX
I'm not asking you to do anything - in fact, the opposite - I'm
sincerely asking you not to do or say anything about this. Please.
\n\nlt will be fine. Thanks for letting me vent.
2016-05-20
10:34:38, Fri
INBOX
F man i'nT sti 1 rea ly angry
about the list. Thought I'd be better after sleeping on it, but I'm not
2016-05-20
10:40:27, Fri
OUTBOX
I'm going to ask andy to keep an eye out (know which system it's
on?) and then just say it's one thing when there's a conflict, but for
routine business like this, this is ridiculous.
2016-05-20
10:46:05, Fri
INBOX
2016-05-20
OUTBOX
10:47:05, Fri
2016-05-20
11:12:39, Fri
OUTBOX
Ugh. Have two nslb interviews today. Really don't feel like doing
them.
2016-05-20
11:21:42, Fri
INBOX
Yuck indeed. You all take a long time with them, which is good, 1
guess. We do 15 minutes.\n\nAlso, I'm thinking you shouldn't
mention the^^^J nonsense to Andy. I'm irritated, but not
bother the DD irritated.
2016-05-20
11:23:43, Fri
OUTBOX
Yeah, but you know these folks already. Or at least know someone
who knows them. These are mostly cold interviews.\n\nWe'll see.
2016-05-20
11:29:58, Fri
INBOX
And 1 just realized I'm going to have to come back downtown after
briefing at LX, to return all the materials to my office.\U0001f621
2016-05-20
11:31:23, Fri
OUTBOX
Leave them at lx! I'm certain^ can find someone to bring them
back for you. Seriously.
2016-05-20
11:31:57, Fri
OUTBOX
What time is your brief?
2016-05-20
11:35:21, Fri
INBOX
Not sure - 445,1 think?
2016-05-20
11:36:14, Fri
OUTBOX
Oof. That's late. I'm SURE you can talk to^ about leaving it in the
ctd front office or somewhere.
2016-05-21
01:32:12, Sat
INBOX
In related news. Bill is fine with Jon covering brief next Wed
45
DOJ-PROD-0000137
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2016-05-21
13:44:58, Sat
INBOX
Hey sent you some email going around this morning. Don't know if
you noted one of them from last night, ^ said never
responded to his email for update. We're talking in an hour, I'm
going to encourage him to speak to Andy and about it, that
it's undermining his position and effectiveness (to Andy) and that
it's unprofessional (to^^^f). Obvious problem is its not easy for
anyj to say that to the DD, nor personality. \n\nThe best
way may simply be for him to say to Andy, you know, 1 contacted
to follow up on the D's request and he didn't so much as
send me an email, even to tell me he was going to talk to you. Let
Andy infer the right leadership action / response.
2016-05-21
14:00:19, Sat
OUTBOX
Got it. And ha ha, just realized the D is out on Monday. Sof^m
won't be giving it direct to him anyway.
2016-05-21
14:07:25, Sat
INBOX
Ha ha indeed. 1 think a slight tweak to^H message is, when
Rybicki's request email went out, he asked who would do this. 1
said CD would. If that's what you want, then you have to help me
with^^|\n\nl MEAN C'MON!H£SA^M, AND CAN'T BE
BOTHERED TO RETURN EMAIL BECAUSE HE
HAS THE DD ON SPEED DIAL.
\U0001f621\U0001f621\U0001f621\U0001f621
2016-05-21
14:07:48, Sat
INBOX
Moving on.
2016-05-21
14:15:00, Sat
OUTBOX
Honestly 1 would suggest he say the second thing you said in that
long text, just that^^^f didn't bother following up with me at
all, and just leave it at that. You can even tell ^ if you want that 1
got mad/frustrated at andy for agreeing to let it go straight to the
DD, and 1 don't want it to seem like we're piling on the dd.
2016-05-21
14:17:00, Sat
INBOX
1 think you're right re approach. 1 hesitate to say what you did,
except it's an important point re the potential
counterproductiveness of piling on.
2016-05-21
14:18:44, Sat
OUTBOX
Go ahead and tell him. Can just be a reflection of you getting angry
re^^^f and me telling you that 1 was mad too re email thing.
2016-05-22
19:06:51, Sun
INBOX
Hi. Got the ERAS on for the first time...\U0001f60a
2016-05-22
20:37:48, Sun
OUTBOX
That's good!\n\nl am STRESSED OUT. Have had an influx of prep
emails about the^ on Tuesday, 1 still haven't pulled all my docs
for financial disclosure, md
46
DOJ-PROD-0000138
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
2016-05-22
20:52:20, Sun
2016-05-22
20:53:06, Sun
Type of Message
INBOX
OUTBOX
But this is ecpa, right? And there are decent ogc
people (in addition to you) who know what they're doing?
Yes. But I still need to revise the papers in the morning, fcgliaa
2016-05-22
23:08:51, Sun
2016-05-22
23:09:11, Sun
2016-05-22
23:27:08, Sun
2016-05-23
09:18:26, Mon
2016-05-23
09:36:33, Mon
2016-05-23
09:37:20, Mon
2016-05-23
09:41:34, Mon
2016-05-23
17:35:00, Mon
2016-05-24
01:02:58, Tue
2016-05-24
01:03:18, Tue
2016-05-24
01:11:44, Tue
2016-05-24
01:22:19, Tue
2016-05-24
22:57:57, Tue
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
2016-05-24 INBOX
01:23:44, Tue
2016-05-24 INBOX
02:00:47, Tue
INBOX
Is Andy out at all next week?
(le, not this coming week, the one after.
Not that I'm aware of.
Can you power up eras now amd work until
physically need to be in?
It's all on the unclassified side. \U0001f612
? Or you
You can eras that, too. But not your work desktop/hard drive
Yeah, it's documents for Andy's prep today that I need to edit.
Yay. Andy just asked me to sit in on the 2:00.
And feel free to forward to Andy if you haven't already. Enough
time passed... _
I'm fortunate to work with you. \U0001f636
Bill did send them at 7:04. Andy sent them to me at the same time
I sent them to him . _ _
Jjust said that on the npr news bulletin tonight at like 5:00 that
they reported that the fbi investigation into Clinton was almost
completed. He doesn't remember the sourcing. Found it very
curious given the timing of today. Just fyi. _
Yeah saw that on a couple of Google News hits. Will go check it
out. God I hope they're right. \n\nProbably going to pull the plug
on my going to NQLA...\U0001f61e _
This isnt good\n\nOfficial: Feds Are Investigating Gov. McAuliffe's
Campaign Donations | WAMU 88.5 - American University
Radio\nhttp://m.wamu.org/#/news/16/05/23/official_fedsJnvesti
gating_gov_mcauliffes_campaign_donations
K. Have some thoughts for your convo with JB tomorrow, they can
wait I, of.course. also happy to relate intetview, though truly, not
much there.
47
DOJ-PROD-0000139
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2016-05-25
22:05:15, Wed
OUTBOX
Traffic is really really really bad.
2016-05-25
22:37:50, Wed
INBOX
Just finished with
2016-05-26
10:38:20, Thu
OUTBOX
1 just sent you an extremely obnoxious opinion piece in the Times.
You might get questions about^^f, so just fyi.
2016-05-26
10:40:46, Thu
INBOX
Hi just saw it, and responded.a douche. And a felon.
\U0001f612 But thanks for the heads up. Kills me how much our
agenda gets driven by adverse press coverage.
2016-05-26
14:27:32, Thu
INBOX
What time are you driving in?\n\nReviewing first section of final
•epDrt now :•/ th(. ~ .;
2016-05-26
14:29:43, Thu
INBOX
Daily 830s until final report is done. Since Andy wants it
substantively complete by the 15th
2016-05-26
14:30:55, Thu
OUTBOX
That stinks for all of you.
2016-05-26
INBOX
still red lining with|
15:44:59, Thu
(wish you were here \U0001f636)J: 1 _ c/' <S - ,
2016-05-26
16:09:06, Thu
INBOX
This report is going to be a bear to get done by
the 15th
2016-05-26
18:48:26, Thu
INBOX
Hi! 1 HAVE TWO HOURS OF BUDGET DISCUSSION AND 1 MIGHT DIE!
!!!!
2016-05-27
11:41:13, Fri
OUTBOX
Oh hey remind me, let’s talk state mou on the way in.
2016-05-27
11:41:17, Fri
INBOX
Yeah thank god its comparatively quiet. 1 likely have a 3 or 330 with
Steinb a c h , | ijgT r .v*;
2016-05-27
11:41:33, Fri
OUTBOX
Should work.
2016-05-27
22:37:42, Fri
INBOX
Hj Hi. Just talked with Bill. Remind me and convo this
afternoon and earlier convo with him, Randy, you.
2016-05-27
23:21:56, Fri
OUTBOX
Headed home now, in the event you want to talk about convo with
bill.
2016-05-28
11:52:09, Sat
INBOX
Headed off to interview now
2016-05-28
15:31:40, Sat
OUTBOX
Ask bill, should 1 reach out to andy with update? Will he? Wait til
Tuesday?
48
DOJ-PROD-0000140
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message Body
2016-05-28
15:54:50, Sat
INBOX
Bill said he was going to tell Andy today that everything went well,
and that he'll provide him more info on Tues. Bill said you should
feel free to talk about it if you want (after you and I talk about it -1
framed it as we were going to talk later today).\n\nSo I'd wait at
least until later today. And, plus, we can talk some more.
2016-05-28
22:10:03, Sat
2016-05-28
22:18:07, Sat
2016-05-28
22:19:23, Sat
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
2016-05-29
00:55:10, Sun
INBOX
2016-05-29
10:59:09, Sun
OUTBOX
This phone keeps saying there's not enough device memory, and to
delete files. I don't think it's emails on Knox. I hate these things...
I can't check for email..!
I think it's knox. Can you go on 324 mail and do some deleting?
2016-05-29
00:55:44, Sun
INBOX
2016-05-29
00:55:53, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-05-29
00:56:24, Sun
INBOX
2016-05-29
00:57:05, Sun
INBOX
2016-05-29
00:58:07, Sun
INBOX
2016-05-29
01:36:54, Sun
INBOX
Paula Broadwell, David Petraeus and the Afterlife of a Scandal
http://nyti.ms/lTOvjKS
2016-05-29
11:11:42, Sun
OUTBOX
Man, that article was depressing. Accurate and depressing.
2016-05-29
12:34:33, Sun
2016-05-29
12:38:25, Sun
INBOX
OUTBOX
And man, that article is depressing.
Yeah, it's depressing because it's true]
2016-05-29
12:39:09, Sun
INBOX
It is. You think she should have been prosecuted?
2016-05-29
12:40:15, Sun
OUTBOX
No. We don't prosecute other journalists, recognizing that her
situation is a little different.
49
DOJ-PROD-0000141
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2016-05-30
22:42:14, Mon
INBOX
How bad is your work week ahead?
2016-05-30
INBOX
And god, going to thinking about work just makes me really mad
23:25:48, Mon
about the| meeting...\U0001f621
2016-05-30
23:39:26, Mon
OUTBOX
You it.
idea. Haven't had a chance to check calendar yet.
2016-05-30
INBOX
Yeah, though 1 need to tell you about a bill - Paul convo he told me
23:51:48, Mon
about. Not just the case, broader. And concerning.
2016-05-31
00:02:35, Tue
OUTBOX
Okay.
2016-05-31
INBOX
Not urgent, can certainly wait until tomorrow. Have
00:03:40, Tue
just been thinking a lot about it and want to bounce off you.
2016-05-31
INBOX
Ok. On eras. Let me finish up....
00:58:51, Tue
2016-05-31
OUTBOX
Want to talk about bill and -r-jotjW'ess
00:59:31, Tue
2016-05-31
INBOX
EEM _■
01:00:53, Tue
2016-05-31
INBOX
Heading in to my 830. Will call you when I'm out
12:32:52, Tue
2016-05-31
OUTBOX
In with andy. Be by soon.
13:30:52, Tue
2016-05-31
OUTBOX
I'm coming with mye updates
13:38:11, Tue
next.
2016-05-31
INBOX
Hey were just spit balling ideas for the D, wanted go give you the
21:16:27, Tue
option to participate.
2016-06-01
INBOX
Remind me to tell you tomorroe or elsewhere tonight convo 1 had
00:20:35, Wed
i 11.
2016-06-01
OUTBOX
Also remind me we need to talk nfpo still.
00:59:54, Wed
2016-06-01
INBOX
God. On an interminable job interview,
18:13:28, Wed
2016-06-01
OUTBOX
I’m on a call.
18:14:03, Wed
2016-06-01
18:14:17, Wed
OUTBOX
Where were^^^^^J^J?
2016-06-01
INBOX
1 don’t know. 1 told them both this morning and via email last nght
18:14:55, Wed
(neither of which mentioned the DD...;))
2016-06-01
21:39:16, Wed
INBOX
You talkin' 'bout evidence yet?
2016-06-01
OUTBOX
Nope not yet.
21:40:03, Wed
50
DOJ-PROD-0000142
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
2016-06-01
22:12:10, Wed
2016-06-02
01:26:43, Thu
2016-06-02
14:53:41, Thu
2016-06-02
21:41:51, Thu
2016-06-02
22:04:57, Thu
2016-06-02
22:07:22, Thu
2016-06-02
22:09:20, Thu
2016-06-02
22:36:13, Thu
2016-06-02
22:51:13, Thu
2016-06-02
22:57:06, Thu
2016-06-02
23:34:50, Thu
2016-06-03
14:26:22, Fri
2016-06-03
14:27:31, Fri
2016-06-05
21:47:21, Sun
2016-06-05
21:52:57, Sun
Type of Message
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
Body
talked to GC at other agency, they were unaware of
discrepancies, they will look into it tomorrow.
Just Td up State issue with Bill
oing back to find ■, wil
call you after I talk to him. _
I think I'm coming to work on Saturday. I just can't take this.
Leaving early/falling behind?\n\nGoing to talk toH now
Yes.
Just finished with JM, he went in to talk to
Andy. Can give you dump if you want
Yeah I can get a dump
And ■ just followed up on what you talked about with
me.
God this is KILLING me. Jones is insistent on cal ling
And
is on AL today....
Sorry, just talked to
To the lawyer? And?
They finally got the call done
2016-06-05
21:54:03, Sun
INBOX
2016-06-06
11:31:24, Mon
INBOX
2016-06-06
19:06:19, Mon
INBOX
No answer. Told her subpoena at COB tomorrow. She's going to
confer with clients and get back. Please hold on info until I send to
Bill.
U I have a 930-1030 with stupid dia. But will try and get all of
mye done at the 830-9,
Gotta call Bill, do you want to listen in for summary?
2016-06-06
21:52:32, Mon
2016-06-06
21:52:42, Mon
2016-06-06
22:04:43, Mon
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
Done with edits, I have copies for you.
Going to talk to Bill
Hey are they ready? Where are you?
51
DOJ-PROD-0000143
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2016-06-06
22:22:56, Mon
INBOX
Was talking to Bill
2016-06-06
23:24:31, Mon
OUTBOX
Spoke to Bill. He's very appreciative.
2016-06-06
23:26:32, Mon
INBOX
2016-06-07
00:25:36, Tue
INBOX
Note bcc on email 1 just sent \U0001f60a
2016-06-07
00:27:32, Tue
OUTBOX
1 did. Thank you.
2016-06-07
00:27:54, Tue
OUTBOX
Think I'm going to pull up eras in about 15, so we can always text
there... \U0001f636
2016-06-07
00:34:45, Tue
INBOX
fftj Well of course you know I'll be on there (eras)
2016-06-07
10:07:00, Tue
INBOX
UjHave to go in and go thru notes for brief to usdi this morning
2016-06-07
12:23:29, Tue
OUTBOX
Mtg with bill at 9 to talk 702
2016-06-07
12:26:28, Tue
INBOX
God 1 want to sit in but absolutely no reasonable reason to
2016-06-07
12:26:43, Tue
INBOX
Plus 1 have to either metro or drive to Pentagon....
2016-06-07
14:04:37, Tue
OUTBOX
Yes, 1 guessed that. \U0001f636\U0001f636\U0001f636 Just
getting out now, though he feels better prepared so that's good.
2016-06-07
21:36:45, Tue
INBOX
Can you lync before you go tonight? Qs from Bill about direction
from Andy coming out of ^ brief.
2016-06-08
09:38:13, Wed
INBOX
Reading the f*cked up first cut of consent letters. They need a lot
of work.
2016-06-08
11:05:41, Wed
INBOX
Did 1 send you the draft consent letters last night? Thought 1 did
but don't see it in sent folder, \n\nl have NO idea why we let
counsel take first crack with pen.
2016-06-08
11:06:36, Wed
OUTBOX
No, you didn't. And 1 have no idea. Probably
aren't real prosecutors.
2016-06-08
11:08:48, Wed
INBOX
Just resent. No idea what happened first time. Maybe hung in eras
2016-06-08
11:23:10, Wed
INBOX
Lis, I'm not sure what I'm supposed to do. 1 was working until close
to 1. \U0001f61e\U0001f614
2016-06-08
11:35:32, Wed
OUTBOX
Was the eras a bad idea?
52
DOJ-PROD-0000144
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2016-06-08
12:16:01, Wed
INBOX
I'm REALLY angry about the consent letter right now. Much worse
than last night. \n\nlt's the little things, like her writing no agents
will participate in the otd review. That sense of entitlement about
how we staff is the result of Andy not simply saying "no" to doj
about the obnoxious filter staffing demand
2016-06-08
12:17:02, Wed
INBOX
Filter says 2 atty one SA one IA but makes no mention of
expanding if merited bu the volume of work.
2016-06-08
16:23:36, Wed
INBOX
Remind me 1 need to talk to you about Andy taking Moffa as his +1
to WH nextThurs
2016-06-08
20:07:50, Wed
OUTBOX
Ooh. Yes. \n\nl'm still waiting on Andy. Paul A. walked in 20
minutes ago. And now Steinbach is here...\U0001f621
2016-06-08
20:11:07, Wed
INBOX
K. You need to talk to Andy alone about media stuff, obviously
2016-06-08
20:17:31, Wed
OUTBOX
I'm still waiting for andy! Just leave it in my ofc?
2016-06-08
20:25:57, Wed
INBOX
m| just called, he's just leaving main justice. They all want to
talk to me privately before group call at 4:40.
2016-06-08
20:26:17, Wed
OUTBOX
Okay that's concerning.
2016-06-08
20:27:40, Wed
INBOX
Did they all just kind of hop in front of you? 1 totally should have
just buzzed in and walked it down to you...\n\nYeah, 1 know.
Hoping they're just trying to enlist my service in calming OTD and
not letting perfect be enemy of the good
2016-06-08
20:40:47, Wed
OUTBOX
Going into wrap. Will hit you at 5.
2016-06-08
21:00:30, Wed
OUTBOX
Hi. Walking back to baker call
2016-06-08
21:01:38, Wed
INBOX
Frustrated over this whole damn article issue. Where do we stand?
2016-06-08
21:01:57, Wed
OUTBOX
No go rej Will share shortly.
2016-06-08
21:02:36, Wed
INBOX
Assume also no to some other third option. \n\nOn Conf call with
doj
2016-06-08
21:02:42, Wed
INBOX
Pre-call was fine
2016-06-08
21:03:27, Wed
OUTBOX
No, not necessarily. That didn't come up. You might be able to go
up there now and follow up with Kortan.
2016-06-08
21:05:51, Wed
INBOX
What did you tell Quinn?
2016-06-08
21:05:59, Wed
INBOX
1 can't leave this call right noe
2016-06-08
21:06:16, Wed
OUTBOX
Andy just gave clear orders to Kortan. 1 will explain later.
53
DOJ-PROD-0000145
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2016-06-08
21:06:41, Wed
INBOX
And 1 sure don't want to do a single thing right now without Andy's
blessing in advance
2016-06-08
21:07:05, Wed
INBOX
Well they're going to talk to the reporter soon and he's not going
to do a damn thigh once we say "never mind"
2016-06-08
21:07:30, Wed
INBOX
Thing not thigh
2016-06-08
21:07:54, Wed
OUTBOX
Hey I'm on a call. Ttyl.
2016-06-08
21:08:27, Wed
INBOX
Yep. I'm going to let this issue drop then...
2016-06-08
21:57:44, Wed
INBOX
Oh boy. Just yelled
2016-06-08
21:58:21, Wed
OUTBOX
Oh man. Why?
2016-06-08
21:59:01, Wed
INBOX
Tell you in person. Laughing with Moffa about it.
2016-06-08
22:02:01, Wed
INBOX
1 called them outside the big group to say, look, we're giving on a
lot of things on the very margins and don't have much left to
bargain with, don't get in a huge back and forth with
2016-06-08
22:04:47, Wed
2016-06-08
22:20:26, Wed
2016-06-08
22:21:20, Wed
2016-06-08
23:03:21, Wed
2016-06-08
23:05:43, Wed
2016-06-08
23:06:29, Wed
2016-06-09
00:10:43, Thu
2016-06-09
00:11:22, Thu
2016-06-09
00:16:18, Thu
2016-06-09
00:21:30, Thu
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
|£fl\n\nMoffa said, "you threw a brush back pitch, didn't even hit
him, he throws off his helmet and charges the mounds."
Bottom line in their first counter offer DOJ is giving up a ton. I said
fine, we can live with this, but this is about the most we can live
with. So if you expect an extended back and forth with^^J don't
give so much right out of the gate. _
In with Andy now.
Cool. Just sent you email you should note to him. My (and his)
recollection was right;) _
Hey Bill is here in my office, talking about WSJ thing
Kortan just came in. I have more. I'll call you from the car.
Ok. Anything to pass to Bill now, or that he should call andy? He
thinks we should play for time.
Yup. Why? You mean with andy?
Nope. Me and you. \n\nBut yes, I wanted to ask later about with
Andy _
Btw, Andy said let's hold in finding out the answer for now.
I want to know, have been talking about it with jon for a couple of
days. You think I should wait? I don't know what we could do with
it, but it seems like an opportunit
54
DOJ-PROD-0000146
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
2016-06-09
00:22:06, Thu
INBOX
2016-06-09
00:22:51, Thu
INBOX
2016-06-09
00:23:27, Thu
INBOX
2016-06-09
00:23:39, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-06-09
00:23:47, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-06-09
13:08:59, Thu
INBOX
2016-06-09
14:42:06, Thu
INBOX
2016-06-09
14:43:00, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-06-10
00:43:15, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-06-10
00:48:21, Fri
INBOX
2016-06-10
01:08:34, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-06-10
01:12:53, Fri
INBOX
2016-06-10
01:13:19, Fri
INBOX
2016-06-10
01:15:09, Fri
INBOX
2016-06-10
01:15:13, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-06-10
01:15:32, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-06-10
01:16:54, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-06-10
01:17:57, Fri
INBOX
2016-06-10
01:18:02, Fri
INBOX
2016-06-10
01:18:19, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-06-10
01:18:49, Fri
INBOX
Anything interesting out of convo you couldn't or didnt want to
share in front of Bill? _
(Perfectly fine if not, just following up before everything is OBE
tomorrow)
Amd did you see request to move meeting up 30 minutes? I
kind of like 10-1130 but I think I can... _
No, nothing additional. That was everything.
I can too. Np.
And man, EVERYONE'S angry. WF doesn't want to give people back
for filt er, radio silence from DoJ,^^J angry about the consent
jetter^_
Yikes! Have a meeting with D at 11 because apparently I'm the only
one read in to a program (nfi) _
How can you be going to brief on something for which you have
nfi? _
Call her now tell her andy is calling please.
Just talked to her she is at her desk - not cell - waiting for the call
He called trisha instead -1 gave him both numbers. Don't know
wha t came of the c onvo.
Ew.^^^ better prepared
I talked with Bill; he had spoken with Andy but Andy had not yet
tried to re ach out for Jim _
Does^| know?!?!? I told her to wait...\U0001f61e
I know, I tried. But in case she was in the metro or something I
wanted him to be able to reach s omeone else. _
She does. She should be calling you for^^^^ cell number.
And god it's really infuriating that^J doesn't answer his phone.
The goddamn Deputy is trying to reach his| and can't!
Hey I just talked to her
Apparently a bunch of emails going arouns
Yup just sent to you.
She said JB hadn't responded and wondered if she should send to
Andy or wait for her chain to. I told her to respond direct to Andy
55
DOJ-PROD-0000147
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
2016-06-10
01:19:04, Fri
INBOX
2016-06-10
01:25:49, Fri
INBOX
2016-06-10
01:28:24, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-06-10
01:29:19, Fri
INBOX
2016-06-10
01:43:03, Fri
INBOX
2016-06-10
02:13:33, Fri
INBOX
1
2016-06-10
02:16:26, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-06-10
02:18:12, Fri
INBOX
2016-06-10
17:07:31, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-06-10
17:08:50, Fri
INBOX
2016-06-10
17:09:25, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-06-10
17:10:57, Fri
INBOX
2016-06-10
19:15:38, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-06-10
19:15:57, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-06-10
19:18:11, Fri
INBOX
2016-06-10
19:18:43, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-06-10
19:21:33, Fri
INBOX
2016-06-10
19:21:58, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-06-10
19:22:34, Fri
INBOX
Thanks. I was going to ask^J to include me but she was harried.
She just called.
I did too.
Pis forward me what she sends?
I agree with you re Jim. Frustrating.
Np. Just talked to I
I hardly did anything
rcailing^H. Tonight may never end.
\U0001f60a
Fine. Talked about haters, his climate survey, why we bother to do
this. _
All great topics. The climate surveys are an annual kick in the balls.
I can't IMAGINE^|
Fie read them to me. 11 pages long. His are cruel too.
The anonymity does it. Brings out the internet nasty
Check vm
Program is about to start, but please confirm here that you got the
vm.
Sorry was in sioc can talk now
Check vm please. Andy called. Program just started so I can only
text
Yes otd is ready. \n\nD is the one who asked how early we could
talk tentative scheduling. D asked if we could do that now (at date
of last brief). I said I thought we should wait until we had laptops in
hand. D said, I think that's right. Thats what I was going off of
Okay, let me text andy.
That occurred at beginning of brief, he wasn't there
56
DOJ-PROD-0000148
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
2016-06-10
19:23:36, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-06-10
19:25:32, Fri
INBOX
2016-06-10
19:25:54, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-06-10
19:26:25, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-06-10
19:37:24, Fri
INBOX
2016-06-10
19:38:40, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-06-10
19:40:03, Fri
INBOX
2016-06-10
19:41:22, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-06-10
19:43:33, Fri
INBOX
2016-06-10
19:45:43, Fri
INBOX
2016-06-10
19:46:19, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-06-10
19:58:56, Fri
INBOX
2016-06-10
20:09:19, Fri
INBOX
2016-06-10
20:19:43, Fri
INBOX
2016-06-10
20:21:48, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-06-10
20:46:10, Fri
INBOX
Yes, he knew that. That's why he called. I just asked him whether
he wants to wait until we actually have eyes on docs.
Also, what I discussed with^^H was don't discuss specific
dates, but throw the willingness out there, tell if we find a
lot of material on laptops we might need more time
I just andy to call your cell if he has more qs.
Andy said:\n\nl am inclined to wait for now. Let's get a peek at it
first, see how long oyd thinks it will take to make sense of
anything, etc. _
Just talked with him, all good
K. Thanks
Hey talked with him just now. Pis give me a holler when you're
done, want to ensure he knows I'm not questioning what he wants
to do, just explaining why we proposed reaching out
Okay. It just started so it is going to be a while
Np. I think we're good, but I just ran thru what D said. Agreed with
Andy that smarter thing is to wait and see what's on there but
likely no way we hit summer solstice if we do that.
Funny, I'm sure it's perfectly fine but got that funny feeling telling
the DD that the D said something different from him. Andy noted
he told that we wouldn't schedule interview until laptops
were reviewed and D didn't have that info, then said he'd take care
of D.\n\nl just don't want him thinking that I felt he needed to
explain himself to me. _
I really wouldn't worry about it, but yes, of course we can talk.
I know you're right but still. Besides, I want to congratulate each
other once we get these dammed things _
Also, funny, mentioned to Andy what was going on, Toscas had
already updated him. \U0001f612
I know you've heard me complain a thousand times, but that sh*t
fromKILLS me _
The DD also calls you directly. This
whole case is fucked up. It is what it is.
Got the laptops :)
57
DOJ-PROD-0000149
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
2016-06-10
20:46:44, Fri
2016-06-10
21:16:25, Fri
2016-06-10
21:35:04, Fri
2016-06-10
21:35:50, Fri
2016-06-10
21:37:33, Fri
2016-06-10
21:59:34, Fri
Type of Message
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
Body
That's awesome. Congratulations.
And thank you, re congrats. Thanks to you, too. :)
His wording cuts through both the bs story, the "owe apology," and
everythin g else. Send t o b oth? _
Yes, I will. Probably to^ with cc to^m
I agree
Don't really have a need to talk work, gonna
assume I was worrying to much earlier and it's all good.
2016-06-10
21:59:59, Fri
2016-06-10
22:00:25, Fri
2016-06-10
22:01:00, Fri
2016-06-10
22:02:50, Fri
2016-06-10
22:05:07, Fri
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
I definitely think that is the case.
I don't know that you should wait until Monday to send it. Sleep on
it and send tomorrow? Or maybe Sun morning for something to
reflect on in services. _
Ok (re Andy) \U0001f636
Yeah, I'll either send late tonight or tomorrow. I just need to figure
out whether how^^^H spells her name.
out whether how^^^J spells her name.
Question for you re Jims email. Is that your voice, ie, would you say
it in terms of fbi core values?\n\nl guess if they ever went to eeo
opr, or anyone else that's a damn hard statement to find fault
with.
2016-06-10
22:05:32, Fri
INBOX
Would know?
2016-06-10
22:06:01, Fri
OUTBOX
know what?
2016-06-10
22:06:14, Fri
OUTBOX
It's not my voice, but who cares?
2016-06-10
22:06:45, Fri
OUTBOX
Hell, Jim wants to refer them to inspection for saying something
like that about a disabled person. 1 won't let him
2016-06-10
22:07:04, Fri
INBOX
2016-06-10
22:07:45, Fri
INBOX
Fair enough re voice. Just go with it
2016-06-10
22:11:09, Fri
OUTBOX
Yup. 1 mean the worst they're going to say is what are you talking
about we weren't making fun, but at least 1 should end it.
2016-06-10
23:05:56, Fri
INBOX
Yes, and this does it.
2016-06-10
INBOX
Yep!!! I'll send you my calm professional answer
23:52:37, Fri
58
DOJ-PROD-0000150
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
2016-06-10
23:53:49, Fri
INBOX
2016-06-10
23:55:13, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-06-10
23:55:46, Fri
INBOX
2016-06-10
23:56:09, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-06-10
23:56:27, Fri
INBOX
2016-06-11
00:43:32, Sat
OUTBOX
2016-06-11
01:07:58, Sat
INBOX
2016-06-11
01:17:07, Sat
OUTBOX
2016-06-11
01:17:49, Sat
OUTBOX
2016-06-11
01:19:11, Sat
OUTBOX
2016-06-11
01:19:35, Sat
INBOX
2016-06-11
01:20:04, Sat
OUTBOX
2016-06-11
01:28:12, Sat
OUTBOX
2016-06-12
01:18:30, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-06-12
01:27:35, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-06-12
01:29:42, Sun
INBOX
2016-06-12
01:31:06, Sun
INBOX
2016-06-12
01:31:14, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-06-12
01:32:07, Sun
OUTBOX
Body
And it's entirely cya.
Of course it is!
Jerky. \U0001f621
He really is.
Like his assiduous notes of everything I said in these 11:00
me eti mgs..._ _
So I'm very torn. Email back to^^^^ on fbi net or unet?
Unet for the email. Otd is done with phase 1
Wow, that was quick
Why unet? I was actually thinking fbi net so at least it can't be
forwarded outside. _
Find anything in allocated space?
Yeah. I think they underpromise because of the 10% of the time
things go horribly badly. \n\nFair enough. You can eras it
tomorrow and they can read on Mon... _
I'm on eras now. Just going to send it off and be done with it.
Am typing it up on fbi net now.
This gave me chills. I'm proud of these girls. Stupid f-ing
bigots.\n\n2 Valedictorians in Texas Declare Undocumented
Status, and Outrage Ensues http://nyti.ms/lWHYYYE _
You've got to read the article I sent. I'm infuriated. I f-ing hate
people . _ ___ _
I started. And while i hate Trump, part of me thought
would not/may not get into^J because they're white and not
from buttf*ck Texas...H6362 _
I'm torn between their achievement and the reality of the
limitations it places on others. All of that separate and distinct
from the bigoted hatred of half (it seems ) of our population.
Dude. THESE GIRLS ARE THE VALEDICTORIANS IN THEIR CLASS.
AND ENGLISH IS THEIR SECOND LANGUAGE. AND THEY OVERCAME
SERIOUS ODDS. THEY HAVE EARNED IT. _
Do you think Yale would be best served being entirely populated
by smart upper income white boys? Come on.
59
DOJ-PROD-0000151
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
2016-06-12
01:33:16, Sun
INBOX
2016-06-12
01:33:54, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-06-12
01:34:41, Sun
INBOX
2016-06-12
01:34:47, Sun
INBOX
2016-06-12
01:35:00, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-06-12
01:35:40, Sun
INBOX
2016-06-12
01:36:36, Sun
INBOX
2016-06-12
01:36:41, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-06-12
01:36:54, Sun
INBOX
2016-06-12
01:36:58, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-06-12
01:37:05, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-06-12
01:37:09, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-06-12
01:38:15, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-06-12
01:40:37, Sun
INBOX
2016-06-12
01:41:40, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-06-12
01:44:28, Sun
OUTBOX
I'm saying the difference between equal opportunity and equal
outcome is hazier as you get closer. _
THESE GIRLS DIDN'T EVEN HAVE AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY! What
are you talking about?!
I'm not saying they didn't deserve it. I'm saying their background
gave them an advantage the upper class white boy didn't get
Is that fair?
We're not talking about south Asians in the same socio-economic
class. _
They earned it. But so did lots of others.
And I'm not talking about these two. I'm talking about the pros and
cons of considering anything other than merit for admission.
No it f-ing did not. Their background gave them an advantage?!
They grew up in a home, in all likelihood, where their parents were
illiterate. Probably wholly uneducated. Undoubtedly poor. Yeah,
those lucky girls who got to bubble in "Mexican."
I get that would further slash minority representation.
I'M TALKING ABOUT THESE TOO.
Sorry, I'm really mad.
And you ARE talking about these two. You said their background
gave them an advantage that upper white kids didn't get and that
is completely BULLSHIT. _
Yes, their background did. They deserve to go, as do thousands of
others
If they were the valedictorian and we undocumented and had the
same story, I dare say they'd be going the same damn place.
That is bs. And I agree with that. That is fake diversity, and we both
know that. Don't you dare lump these girls, who on top of
everything else, had the courage to state that they were
undocumented, in with^^H kid.
60
DOJ-PROD-0000152
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2016-06-12
01:45:59, Sun
INBOX
These two are being held up because of the broader issue. Distill
the calculus, and the argument. What is the value of diversity such
that we can measure it against other qualifications? Like being
young and rooting for Bernie until you start earning a paycheck, 1
find my views on admissions / hiring have been changed by
watching^^^B^^^^^^^^II
2016-06-12
01:46:58, Sun
INBOX
I'm not lumping them in. They are a great success story. But the
question of their story is whether or not the process unduly
weights the decision.
2016-06-12
01:47:10, Sun
INBOX
Take the two of them out of it
2016-06-12
01:47:25, Sun
INBOX
Should race play an additional plus in admission?
2016-06-12
01:47:35, Sun
INBOX
Should economic background?
2016-06-12
01:47:40, Sun
OUTBOX
1 get that. But a classroom filled with kids with only one experience
is not education. They necessarily bring a different outlook, and
their race, and status, are a part of that.
2016-06-12
01:47:46, Sun
OUTBOX
ABSOLUTELY!
2016-06-12
01:48:02, Sun
INBOX
Has affirmative action been positive, in the final analysis? Has it
gone on too long?
2016-06-12
01:48:25, Sun
OUTBOX
And 1 won't take them out of it. 1 started this discussion about
them!
2016-06-12
01:48:45, Sun
INBOX
Look, I'm not some freaky Ayn Rand disciple.
2016-06-12
01:48:52, Sun
OUTBOX
We'll have to answer that last question in person. It's too
complicated to do over text.
2016-06-12
01:49:23, Sun
INBOX
I'm happy for the two of them
2016-06-12
01:49:23, Sun
INBOX
Fine
2016-06-12
01:49:47, Sun
INBOX
They fully deserve to go, and demonstrate the absolute bigoted
nonsense of Trump
2016-06-12
01:49:47, Sun
INBOX
Truly.
2016-06-12
02:02:01, Sun
INBOX
1 have no idea if this is accurate, but clearly, she deserves to go to
Yale if it is. 1 stand by my broader questions about whether we
have the appropriate weighting of diversity in the eduactional
application process. \n\n Larissa Martinez | Wiki & Bio |
Everipedia, the encyclopedia of
everything\nhttps://www.everipedia.com/larissa-martinez-l/
61
DOJ-PROD-0000153
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
2016-06-12
02:14:58, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-06-12
02:15:16, Sun
INBOX
2016-06-12
02:51:57, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-06-12
12:42:13, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-06-12
13:40:12, Sun
INBOX
2016-06-12
13:43:15, Sun
INBOX
2016-06-12
14:03:05, Sun
INBOX
2016-06-12
14:06:44, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-06-12
14:13:57, Sun
INBOX
2016-06-13
20:02:15, Mon
INBOX
2016-06-13
20:04:26, Mon
INBOX
2016-06-13
20:05:26, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-06-13
20:05:47, Mon
INBOX
2016-06-13
20:06:27, Mon
INBOX
2016-06-13
20:07:27, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-06-13
20:07:42, Mon
INBOX
2016-06-13
20:08:06, Mon
INBOX
2016-06-13
20:08:38, Mon
INBOX
2016-06-13
20:38:01, Mon
INBOX
2016-06-13
20:57:30, Mon
OUTBOX
Did you read her speech? I got chills. \U0001f636
This can't be good for the usic.\n\nThe Chinese Hackers in the Back
Office http://nyti.ms/lXNpS20 _
We're going to be dealing with this hve for the next year.
\U0001f621\U0001f621\U0001f621\U0001f621\U0001f621
? The guy in Tampa
Why? I saw on the CT notification he was known to us. Bad?
Or are you saying simply because that happens every time with
each ^|...wasn't sure if there was something else prompting your
comment. \n\nFor sure there will be a show. \U0001f621
We re never going to hear the end of it.
And yeah, the no win of the narrative.
Hi. I may go insane editing this. You simply cannot edit with 12
people.
****Also, remind me to tell you to flag for Andy^^J emails we
(actually ICIG) found that have portion marks (C) on a couple of
paras. DoJ was Very Concerned about this, willing to bet they will
tell George _
Found on the laptops?
No. Found on the 30k provided to State originally.
No one noticed. And while minor, it cuts against "I never send or
received anything marked classified"
So why would they tell George?
Which may or may not be a big deal, but it is notable. Easier to
explain on Lync or in person, \n\nl will put on bullets tonight,
which I am sending to you _
Because they're worried, holy cow, if the fbi missed this, what else
was missed? _
Which I get, because I had the same worry. \n\nAnd they like
snitching to George
Just dropped off your uco print job \U0001f636
Oh jesus. Have something to tell you. Will call after wrap.
62
DOJ-PROD-0000154
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
2016-06-13
20:58:11, Mon
INBOX
2016-06-13
20:58:31, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-06-13
20:58:57, Mon
INBOX
2016-06-13
20:59:06, Mon
INBOX
2016-06-13
20:59:13, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-06-13
20:59:25, Mon
INBOX
2016-06-13
20:59:39, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-06-13
21:00:16, Mon
INBOX
2016-06-13
21:00:37, Mon
INBOX
2016-06-13
21:09:15, Mon
INBOX
2016-06-13
22:24:31, Mon
INBOX
2016-06-13
22:28:56, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-06-13
23:35:06, Mon
INBOX
2016-06-13
23:36:13, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-06-13
23:36:47, Mon
INBOX
2016-06-13
23:37:10, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-06-13
23:37:42, Mon
INBOX
2016-06-13
23:56:14, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-06-13
23:56:45, Mon
INBOX
2016-06-14
00:22:17, Tue
INBOX
2016-06-14
16:22:23, Tue
INBOX
2016-06-14
16:44:01, Tue
INBOX
You know how to get my attention/interest. \U0001f60a
Yeah, well this will.
Tease....;)
Get us a clue...
July 2
Oh boy
Correct.
Do I need to back off what I told just now based on our
Do I need to back off what I told just now
lunch line convo?
I told him I had to get confirmation from 7th floor
JR sent new redline of D's thing on red side
Just relayed to I
I, he's calling Toscas
Yup. Toscas literally just called. Andy couldn't talk, so we will
discuss soon.
Hey do you anticipate mye due-outs tonight? I think I'm going to
get out of here. _
No. I hope to be leaving in 10-15 minutes. Andy on with toscas
now.
Arghh! Ok I'll wait...\n\nAnd thanks
Don't! Truly.
15 minutes is easy...\U0001f636
Okay, will call you in 5.
K.\n\u263a
And ha, Bill called right after we talked. I guess it's good to answer
your phone when the boss calls at 8 ...
Put a hard copy of the report in your center desk drawer
Set up a conference call so you can dial in as we take care of
errands...\U0001f636
63
DOJ-PROD-0000155
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
2016-06-14
22:35:54, Tue
Type of Message
INBOX
Body
And hey, 2) ^^^HsaidToscas called, said Andy told him to lock in
the 2nd, andthat^^^H had done that. Hopefully accurate;
would have appreciated a heads up even if a foregone conclusion.
2016-06-14
INBOX
22:46:56, Tue _
2016-06-15 INBOX
01:15:02, Wed
And hey, 3) I have an answer for interview location. Brilliant. (Jon
thought of it). Completely handles the issue. _
On September 13, 2007, Martin appeared on Comedy Central's The
Colbert Report to discuss Mother Teresa's fifty-year sense of
abandonment by God which had much coverage in the media at
the time. Martin appeared several more times on The Colbert
Report, once to discuss Pope Benedict XVI's visit to the U.S. in
April, 2008,[8] and again on February 23, 2009 to discuss how
poverty (or, at least, reducing the importance one places on
material goods) can bring one closer to God.[9]\n\nOn March 18,
2010, Martin was invited to the program in the wake of Glenn
Beck's suggesting that Catholics run away from priests who preach
"social justice."[10] Martin noted that "social justice addresses the
things that keep people poor" and "asks you why are these people
poor." He added that "Christ asked us to work with the poor.... In
the Gospel of Matthew He says that the way that we're going to be
judged at the end of our lives is not what church we prayed in or
how we prayed but really ... how we treated the poor."
2016-06-15
01:15:07, Wed
2016-06-15
01:25:32, Wed
2016-06-15
01:44:39, Wed
2016-06-15
01:45:09, Wed
2016-06-15
01:53:07, Wed
2016-06-15
13:29:12, Wed
2016-06-15
13:29:59, Wed
2016-06-15
17:18:42, Wed
2016-06-16
18:08:57, Thu
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
F Glenn Beck
Agreed
I thought this was very interesting. \n\nDonald Trump\u2019s
Mormon Problem http://nyti.ms/lUpx3uw _
\U0001f60a saw it this morning, meant to read it but didn't.
I really like David Brooks.\n\nThe Building Blocks of Learning
http://nyti.ms/lrnbLSw _
Want to ask doj to ask h to come to dc. Do interview at hq. Or
nvra.
Sure why not. Is especially important if the goal is to prevent leaks.
Trump's talking about the investigation
Hey heads up, Moffa is telling^ because he's been staffing it,
was allegedly angry a follow up Q she had about the
PDB piece (the one that prompted the^^^^^^J brief today)
wasn't answered today and she may call Andy
64
DOJ-PROD-0000156
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
2016-06-16
18:11:06, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-06-16
18:13:04, Thu
INBOX
2016-06-16
19:33:28, Thu
INBOX
2016-06-16
20:26:14, Thu
INBOX
2016-06-16
22:42:39, Thu
INBOX
2016-06-17
21:56:15, Fri
INBOX
2016-06-17
21:56:49, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-06-18
21:30:09, Sat
INBOX
2016-06-18
22:01:17, Sat
OUTBOX
2016-06-18
22:15:49, Sat
OUTBOX
2016-06-18
22:43:20, Sat
INBOX
2016-06-18
23:00:55, Sat
OUTBOX
2016-06-19
00:53:52, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-06-19
02:06:33, Sun
INBOX
2016-06-19
02:07:16, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-06-19
02:08:04, Sun
INBOX
2016-06-19
02:08:28, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-06-19
02:09:27, Sun
INBOX
Body
Yikes.
Yeah not a big deal - was supposed to in PDB today but will run
tomorrow. Info is not time sensitive. I think it was more (all
allegedly according to our PDB people, who may be dramatic) that
she didn't get her question answered before the follow on briefing.
ambushed me...\U0001f612\n\nWill call when out
Much better numbers for you :D
Hey see email. Can you call me? Q which will have to go to Andy
Now we're talking about Clinton, and how a lot of people are
holding their breath, hoping.
DID YOU TELL HIM THAT YOU ARE THE LEAD ON THAT CASE?!
Andy just called me with a question that I should remember from
my doj days and don't. Makes me frustrated. Will need to look it
up tonight. _
Just can't remember what kind of contact is permissible once a
subject has lawyered up pre-charges. I know an ausa can't contact,
but I thought a source still could. Usao and doj are saying no, and I
seriously can't remember. _
But hasn't been charged? I think we have much more latitude than
attys do, provided we don't coordinate (which I think triggers
McDade stuff). But I'm far less an authority than you. I do think we
can use sources, though. Call a good cdc, they'll know. Sadly I can't
p oint y ou to one ajt^f_
Yes, that's my recollection, but I just don't remember.
Oh god yes. No good can come of that. Your dad know you're
heading up the case yet?
Well you may not come back if they go
video route, right?
Video, no. I just doubt that is going to happen.
I hope not (re video). But it's clear that's how JR is pushing
Andy's not. That's got to be equal sway, at the very least.
Nor Bowdich. Nor pretty much anyone else as best I can tell. Thats
got to count for something.
65
DOJ-PROD-0000157
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
2016-06-19
02:10:16, Sun
INBOX
2016-06-19
02:10:56, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-06-19
02:12:06, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-06-19
02:12:26, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-06-19
02:12:37, Sun
INBOX
2016-06-19
02:12:46, Sun
INBOX
2016-06-19
02:13:20, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-06-19
02:15:16, Sun
INBOX
2016-06-19
02:15:46, Sun
INBOX
2016-06-19
02:19:54, Sun
INBOX
2016-06-19
02:20:53, Sun
INBOX
2016-06-19
02:28:47, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-06-19
15:15:51, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-06-19
15:16:20, Sun
INBOX
2016-06-19
15:19:29, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-06-19
19:34:32, Sun
INBOX
2016-06-19
19:34:44, Sun
INBOX
2016-06-19
20:07:35, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-06-19
20:07:57, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-06-19
20:20:47, Sun
INBOX
And still, i don't think doj has the nerve - or that it ultimately serves
their interests - to tell him he cant, or even that he shouldn't, do it.
I agree. But those couple of hours to takes to set it up could be
EXTREMELY awkward. _
Yeah, but you know that doesn't really matter. They'll call rybicki,
or andy. _
Can't enter after midnight, you mean?
And they say, sorry, he hasn't said, exactly. We'll pass a message to
him b _
Yes re entrance
Not credible. Surely even if opa doesn't say what it's about, it will
be obvious. _
And so what are they gonna do?
Everyone over there says, "we left a message. Sounds like it's
about.." _
Doj will be fine. They'll huff and puff but ultimately what are they
going to do? Truly. In 4 hours? They can barely assemble a
conference call in that time. . _
Announce at 11 and you lose and hour and a half to lunch time
confusion anyway. It'll be Ok... _
They can tell the D no. And he really wants to avoid straight up
insubordination if he can...
Florida has a different rule re represented parties. It is really bad
for us. _
Oh. What was the answer? All this based on bar rules
Yup. Pretty much as soon as we tell usao, we are prohibited from
making any contact. Terrible disincentive to not talk to your usao.
Funny how it all comes down to state bar rules. Seems very
capricious, like there should be some supremacy clause to get us
out of it... _
And damn...a mess that made its way up to DD level?
It didn't apply to us, until dumas congress passed mcdade.
Yes. Big implications for the continues investigation against
Yep, well, maybe this is the chance for a legislative fix. More
important than half assed gun sale notification....
66
DOJ-PROD-0000158
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2016-06-19
21:47:42, Sun
INBOX
And the more 1 read and consider, the more 1 think there's no way
doj asks the D to stop if they know he's going to recommend what
he's recommending.
2016-06-19
21:48:40, Sun
INBOX
Not an issue.
2016-06-19
21:50:51, Sun
INBOX
Press conference the damn thing and be done with it.
2016-06-19
22:09:22, Sun
OUTBOX
I'm not sure 1 agree. They VERY MUCH want to be standing side by
side, regardless of what's announced. Even knowing what he's
going to say. I'm not sure they'll be okay with it.
2016-06-19
22:11:39, Sun
INBOX
I'm sure they do. I'm talking about what it would take for them to
say "no." There's a gap there, and we're in it.
2016-06-20
OUTBOX
1 need to get started on that doc for andy. Which 1 really don't feel
10:26:48, Mon
like doing. Ppi
2016-06-20
INBOX
The legislation doc? 1 can help proof if you want.
10:35:19, Mon
Largely down to interview prep at
this point.
2016-06-20
13:47:15, Mon
INBOX
1 have a 1030 but free until then
2016-06-20
17:26:51, Mon
INBOX
Hey! one of your jerkies?
2016-06-20
17:32:24, Mon
INBOX
Sorry she's not - just looked it up. The one above is retiring soon.
2016-06-20
19:52:01, Mon
OUTBOX
Hey. Meeting with my cyber guy, think he's looking for his next gig.
2016-06-20
20:10:44, Mon
INBOX
Damn your schedule got sucky. You have any time before wrap?
2016-06-20
20:12:34, Mon
INBOX
He want a job in CD4?
2016-06-21
00:02:42, Tue
INBOX
Mills' laptop unallocated space analysis is done! Guess (roughly)
how much in scope content we got!
2016-06-21
00:08:47, Tue
OUTBOX
How much?
2016-06-21
00:10:07, Tue
INBOX
"Zero or near-zero in-store content"
2016-06-21
00:10:12, Tue
INBOX
Scope
2016-06-21
00:11:17, Tue
OUTBOX
Well there you go. Thanks for the info.
2016-06-21
14:51:14, Tue
OUTBOX
And kind of annoying, we're getting like barely any time with Andy,
and we need more of it! \U0001f621
2016-06-21
14:52:12, Tue
INBOX
1 was gonna say, 1 thought you popped green earlier - not a long
convo...will he be available later?
67
DOJ-PROD-0000159
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
2016-06-21
14:52:37, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-06-21
14:56:01, Tue
INBOX
2016-06-21
14:59:19, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-06-21
15:00:58, Tue
INBOX
2016-06-21
18:07:59, Tue
INBOX
2016-06-21
19:07:48, Tue
INBOX
2016-06-21
22:46:09, Tue
INBOX
2016-06-21
22:46:56, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-06-21
23:53:36, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-06-22
03:27:19, Wed
OUTBOX
2016-06-22
16:38:15, Wed
OUTBOX
2016-06-22
16:41:56, Wed
INBOX
2016-06-22
21:57:26, Wed
INBOX
2016-06-23
00:25:38, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-06-23
00:26:22, Thu
INBOX
2016-06-23
00:26:43, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-06-23
18:17:44, Thu
INBOX
2016-06-24
00:49:47, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-06-24
00:52:40, Fri
INBOX
Body
12:45, but I won't be there. \U0001f621
Can you conference call in for the first 15 minutes? SIOC can set up
a bridge easily. Or do you need classified?
Not really.^ will handle.
Andy out m-w next week, or just m-t?
Bill went long, Jon and I have to talk to him about MYE then I'm
running.,.:D _
Bill needed to unpack the D speech vs video issue. For an hour.
And while I'm thinking about it, I did not tell Bill about discussion re
loop back with David M _
Np. No one else is really tracking that right now.
You should read this. Kinda makes me like/feel sorry for the
guy.\n\nWill Trump Swallow the G.O.P. Whole?
http://nyti.ms/28JuKjm _
And great, 10,000 emails came in requiring us to respond to
proposed gun legislation tonight. And I did and now I'm wired.
\U0001f621\U0001f621\U0001f621 _
Hi. Just leaving my meeting now. How we make law in this country
is offensive and irresponsible. \U0001f621 _
I know it is. Its why i LOATHE congress. Can't wait to hear the story.
Hey can I put what you told me about the Privacy Act mtg in the
nightly bullets to Bill, including her going to beginning of next D
brief? Will not provide detail other than to say mtg occurred today.
You're kidding about the Giacalone article, right?
Oh. Christ. I thought I had another problem to deal with.
If course I want to hear nsd screw-job story. Also relay mtg at fed
programs,thinks it's g oing to have to gcrto dag
And instead I'm busting my butt trying to fight stupid
legislation.
Which isn't going to pass! That's the silly thing - OCA and OLA
ought to be able to say, give this some effort so everyone knows
where we stand, but understand it won't pass, so don't stress too
much about it b
68
DOJ-PROD-OOOOI 6 O
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2016-06-24
01:00:26, Fri
OUTBOX
It didn't pass, but oca says it's not dead, and is likely to reoccur.
2016-06-24
01:12:19, Fri
INBOX
Just talked to^^^J Not official, but looks like DC for interview
venue. Should have confirmation tomorrow morning.
2016-06-24
10:50:07, Fri
OUTBOX
This is good news. \n\nVW to Pay Over $10 Billion for U.S.
Emissions Scandal http://nyti.ms/2902eut
2016-06-24
14:06:35, Fri
INBOX
And done with Bill. Got a project, lots to talk to you about. Big
bureau future structure stuff
2016-06-24
14:06:41, Fri
INBOX
Plus great gossip
2016-06-24
14:06:50, Fri
INBOX
Like Jones to replace BBS!!
2016-06-24
17:35:56, Fri
INBOX
Hey let me know when 1 can stop by and tell you about a call which
may come from agency to 7th floor...
2016-06-24
23:10:15, Fri
OUTBOX
We have no idea when it will be right now...
2016-06-24
23:10:58, Fri
INBOX
Very true. Or if it even happens
2016-06-24
23:11:16, Fri
INBOX
But it would be a mistake not to
2016-06-24
23:11:58, Fri
OUTBOX
A mistake, huh?;)
2016-06-24
INBOX
Ha. 1 meant not to have a statement^ - ' ' • ” '
23:13:22, Fri
\U0001f636
2016-06-25
11:33:22, Sat
INBOX
And unrelated, stupid brexit. Lost^H in tsp IN ONE DAY. 1 know 1
won't draw on that for years, average return over time, stick with
investment stategy and blah blah blah, but Jesus.
2016-06-26
01:23:43, Sun
OUTBOX
What a brazen, bald - faced joke. Evangelical Christians should be
insulted.\n\nA Born-Again Donald Trump? Believe It, Evangelical
Leader Says http://nyti.ms/294uH2j
2016-06-27
10:29:20, Mon
INBOX
What time does Andy leave? Or is your whole day bad?
2016-06-27
10:31:49, Mon
OUTBOX
2:00. I'm busy through 4:00.
2016-06-27
11:18:43, Mon
INBOX
What does your early morning look like today? Need to grab
Andy s markup from you
2016-06-27
11:21:26, Mon
OUTBOX
I'm busy starting at 9. Free from 9:30 to 10. Busy again at 10.
2016-06-27
11:22:14, Mon
INBOX
930 then. I'll come up to your office.
69
DOJ-PROD-OOOOI 6 I
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2016-06-27
11:25:05, Mon
INBOX
You're also welcome to come to mine but I'm figuring yours is
more convenient. \n\nNow you apparently have NO gaps in your
schedule.
2016-06-27
11:36:43, Mon
INBOX
Pope went to Armenia and talked about genocide. Turkey p*ssed...
2016-06-27
15:42:34, Mon
INBOX
And hey work stuff for DD (though 1 suppose you can do via phone
or email), pis call me when you have a moment
2016-06-28
00:24:57, Tue
INBOX
2016-06-28
00:25:15, Tue
INBOX
Relaying stories of interview prep. 1 need to talk to my guys
2016-06-28
00:26:04, Tue
OUTBOX
Uh oh. What did he say?
2016-06-28
00:27:56, Tue
INBOX
Just them picking stupid shit to focus on/ask about. Stuff we
speculate but don't know, to which there is a fairly easy response,
and which doesn't advance our understanding of fundamental
issues
2016-06-28
00:29:13, Tue
INBOX
And re work, goddammit I'm frustrated. 1 don't want genius, but be
f*cking smarter about things.
2016-06-28
02:17:28, Tue
INBOX
And hey, 1 need to know who has access to bpms and will help me
out for the job interview with others' historical time in job data.Hj
2016-06-28
OUTBOX
02:28:47, Tue
2016-06-28
02:29:33, Tue
INBOX
2016-06-28
INBOX
And hey. 1 want to thank you for today. My self-interest asidep&l
02:32:30, Tue
'j- ' , " *' "V 1,4 „ : ~ "^thanks for
your advocacy with Andy and Bill and everything you do every
day.\n\n\U0001f636\U0001f636\U0001f636\U0001f636\U0001f6
36\U0001f636\U0001f636
2016-06-28
02:34:09, Tue
OUTBOX
1 don't know who that is. Does^H? Probably no.
2016-06-28
02:34:29, Tue
OUTBOX
SB?
2016-06-28
02:35:41, Tue
INBOX
IjJ does not. MaybeBut 1 don't know about her
2016-06-28
02:37:21, Tue
OUTBOX
Yeah, might be too close.
2016-06-28
02:45:00, Tue
INBOX
is too^mni
2016-06-28
02:45:08, Tue
INBOX
You're right
70
DOJ-PROD-0000162
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
2016-06-28
03:20:30, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-06-28
09:33:01, Tue
INBOX
2016-06-28
10:47:29, Tue
INBOX
2016-06-28
10:47:52, Tue
INBOX
2016-06-28
10:48:40, Tue
INBOX
2016-06-28
11:01:45, Tue
INBOX
2016-06-28
11:04:18, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-06-28
11:22:55, Tue
INBOX
2016-06-28
11:24:02, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-06-28
11:26:00, Tue
INBOX
2016-06-28
11:35:39, Tue
INBOX
2016-06-28
11:37:51, Tue
INBOX
And you should ask^| about Harbach soon before it is too late
and he ne ver speaks to you again._
I'll ask U, though funny thing is I think he will be ok with it, just
like he was the Mills preamble. Because both this and that are
reasonable and help the cause _
Meanwhile I'm sitting here spinning in my head about the case.
Angry at myself for not thinking about raising Judiciary and Intel
committees. I have in the past, but the time to do it was yesterday.
Clearly the man is, though. Just feels like I dropped the ball.
And the more I think of it, no way the D or DD should call ICIG.
Delegate that to Bill. _
Remember at the beginning of the case, Randy was delegating
contact with him to^^f and Jon...
That's great advice but they all kind of tumble around in there
together, inseparable. \U0001f615\n\nThe interview needs
tweaking, the 302s need a fine edit, the summaries need to be
written, I need to see what I did wrong or forgot or put off and not
do that again and I need to do background for the job application,
combination of I'm perfect for the job and not good enough and
not going to get it and and and. _
You're probably not going to get it. But that's not because you're
not good enough. That's because of the egos of other people in our
organization. So we'll try the best we can, and know that you'll get
it eventually. _
I'll be retired, eventually. Certainly well before I get to AD, if I have
to spend the time in each job that miraculously doesn't apply to
the chosen few. But I need my CT club card to do that.
In fairness, you've been a SC for four months. We'll do our
research, but I think you're going to be hard pressed to find even a
CT SC who was promoted that quickly. _
I will have completed five months by next weekend and be into my
6th month _
Grumble grumble grumble. Look. I'm responsible for all the career
choices I've made. And as you've pointed out, I wouldn't change
them.^^^^^^^l for making me understand and own and see
that as a positive, \n\nl just get really angry and dispirited at seeing
less (frequently MUCH less) competent leadership advance. Case in
point: who's my new boss? Who are all these great SACs with Cl
backgrounds?
Ok I'm done. I'll put in for jobs I want and work hard and well no
matter what happens.
71
DOJ-PROD-0000163
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
2016-06-28
16: 07:32, Tue
2016-06-28
16:43:53, Tue
2016-06-29
10:37:41, Wed
Type of Message
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
2016-06-29
10:39:47, Wed
2016-06-29
10:41:23, Wed
INBOX
INBOX
Also, I'm skipping the CD 1 to work on midyear.
God I am getting GRILLED by Laufman right now.
hey, re today. I'm going to be on a tight schedule this morning. So
if you are not at my ofc by 9:40 (assuming^^J can go). I'm just
going to leave with him and have you meet us over there?
That's fine. I will hop out of my staff mtg at 930. The plan is we
take separate cars as you need to stay?
2016-06-29
10:41:40, Wed
2016-06-29
10:50:27, Wed
2016-06-29
10:54:56, Wed
2016-06-29
11:00:02, Wed
2016-06-29
11:22:17, Wed
2016-06-29
11:27:15, Wed
2016-06-29
11:28:11, Wed
2016-06-29
11:29:30, Wed
2016-06-29
11:30:11, Wed
2016-06-29
11:31: 29, Wed
2016-06-29
11:32:23, Wed
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
Yes please. Are you sure you can hop out then? You have to give
your "any objections" talk too though.
I'm going to start at 9 and leave at 935. Should be enough, as
we've covered everything before. If not, just leave at 940 and I'll
meet y ou there.
Okay, might leave at 9:37, if you're not there
Btw, today supposed to be SPECTACULAR.
\U0001f636 _
I'll try. I'm going to be really busy today. Will explain why later.
That stinks....ok...
Work or house/personal stuff?
Work.
Boo. That came out of nowhere?
Yes,^ called me at dinner last night. IPC being convened on the
SH stuff Friday, I need to prep FOUR ADs for it tomorrow.
2016-06-29
11:36:42, Wed
INBOX
Jesus. Well, they're getting their money's worth out of you before
you go...\n\nYou need to decide and talk to Andy about LA.
2016-06-29
12:19:10, Wed
INBOX
K. Mtg with Moffa and^H right now
72
DOJ-PROD-0000164
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2016-06-29
12:19:26, Wed
OUTBOX
Np. Need to talk to trisha now anyway
2016-06-29
12:19:47, Wed
INBOX
Hey have a related work questiob
2016-06-29
12:20:08, Wed
INBOX
What was the answer on^| material 1) in the case file 2) in the
Ihm?
2016-06-29
16:36:16, Wed
INBOX
What time is your conference call tomorrow?
2016-06-29
16:38:31, Wed
OUTBOX
2:30
2016-06-29
16:38:35, Wed
OUTBOX
Cleaning up now
2016-06-29
16:39:56, Wed
INBOX
K. Walking over...
2016-06-29
18:46:00, Wed
INBOX
God. Bill just asked to block out an hour for our MYE wrap because
he wants to talk thru things...what more is there to talk
about?\n\nMay 1 mention D's plan to inform Judiciary, Intel, and
DNI so he doesn't spin about that?
2016-06-29
18:53:15, Wed
OUTBOX
But just keep it quiet, obviously.
2016-06-29
19:51:42, Wed
INBOX
1 didn't need to. Just got done. Many thoughts.
2016-06-29
19:51:58, Wed
INBOX
Walking back to office with Moffa
2016-06-29
20:11:44, Wed
INBOX
Heading up to your office
2016-06-30
10:31:19, Thu
INBOX
All the airport tarmac articles finally burst out. Took a little bit. Not
a big deal, just ASTOUNDINGLY bad optic.
2016-06-30
10:31:34, Thu
INBOX
And doesn't help what the D is trying to do.
2016-06-30
10:31:58, Thu
INBOX
All at work busy?
2016-06-30
10:32:22, Thu
OUTBOX
Yup. Stupid stupid stupid. And if we had done it, we'd never be
hearing the end of it.
2016-06-30
10:33:08, Thu
OUTBOX
Yeah, just work.
2016-06-30
10:34:16, Thu
INBOX
And from EVERYONE. This, one guy over there calls with quasi -
apology. Silence from everyone else, \n\nl sent DoJ one of the
articles last night, just because. Maybe an answer to their
occasional grumbling about our 7th floor.
2016-06-30
10:35:32, Thu
OUTBOX
What grumbling? Not following.
2016-06-30
10:36:45, Thu
INBOX
Just when they randomly bitch about what the D wants, or our
timetable, etc. Just making the point that we're not doing wildly
inappropriate stuff like this
73
DOJ-PROD-0000165
Strozk-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2016-06-30
12:22:56, Thu
INBOX
Bill apparently called Jon in early this morning with some follow -
on asks from the convo yesterday. \U0001f612
2016-06-30
12:23:02, Thu
INBOX
Trying to get details...
2016-06-30
12:27:46, Thu
OUTBOX
And oh boy. Bill needs to relax.
2016-06-30
12:29:16, Thu
INBOX
Bill is doing what my agents are doing. Only they settle more easily
about letting the unnecessary nice-to-haves go....
2016-06-30
12:59:33, Thu
INBOX
Omg he is spinning about the tarmac meeting, viewed in
conjunction with the^^^^^^^J Wants to meet at 4, have us
bring lists of what we would do in an ordinary circumstance (easy,
refer to PC) and in this circumstance (easy, refer to 7th floor)....
2016-06-30
14:01:23, Thu
OUTBOX
Hi. Sorry was in with rybicki.
2016-06-30
19:00:35, Thu
INBOX
Hi. What time is your Pre Huddle? Now?
2016-06-30
21:07:50, Thu
INBOX
Need to talk to you. Not good
2016-06-30
21:08:23, Thu
OUTBOX
On with trisha. Give me three minutes.
2016-06-30
22:20:53, Thu
INBOX
And of course if ^ leaves let me know and I'll come read up there.
..though 1 suspect you're cramming together sob you can go
2016-06-30
22:21:14, Thu
OUTBOX
We just finished. In with andy now.
2016-06-30
22:28:38, Thu
INBOX
K. Rybicki just sent another version.
2016-06-30
22:32:55, Thu
OUTBOX
Bill just popped his head in, hopefully to talk to him.
2016-06-30
22:34:11, Thu
INBOX
Hope so. Just left Bill. Talked about the speech, the^l stuff
relating to the case, and what i told you about earlier.
2016-06-30
22:39:48, Thu
INBOX
He changed President to "another senior government official"
2016-06-30
22:44:01, Thu
INBOX
Also, just emailed JR asking if D might want to call US Atty at some
point.
2016-06-30
23:31:11, Thu
OUTBOX
1 mentioned us atty to andy, he'll do it.
2016-06-30
23:32:02, Thu
INBOX
Thank you. It's the right thing to do, particularly given all the
discussion of "prosecutors."
2016-06-30
23:32:34, Thu
OUTBOX
Won't be pre-stsgment though.
2016-06-30
23:33:10, Thu
INBOX
That's fine, just in the near term along with Hill and DNI seems
appropriate
74
DOJ-PROD-OOOOI 66
Strzok-Page Texts
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
2016-07-01
02:11:25, Fri
INBOX
Where'd he come from? And he's going OUT as an asac, right?
2016-07-01
02:12:02, Fri
OUTBOX
He has worked for the dd office for a while. Going to be a sac in AT.
2016-07-01
02:12:19, Fri
INBOX
Remind me Jons question about whether we should have ever
opened mye to begin with. A perfect storm of Randy and John
bluster, with political background...
2016-07-01
02:12:55, Fri
INBOX
Derp derpy Derp.
2016-07-01
02:13:14, Fri
INBOX
Doing what, for the DD'S office?
2016-07-01
02:14:24, Fri
OUTBOX
Oh boy. Great.
2016-07-01
09:34:43, Fri
INBOX
Holy cow... nyt breaking Apuzzo, Lync will accept whatever rec D
and career prosecutors make. No political appointee input
INBOX
Lynch. Timing not great, but whatever. Wonder if that's why the no
coordination language added
2016-07-01
11:26:30, Fri
OUTBOX
No way. This is a purposeful leak following the airplane snafu.
2016-07-01
11:29:33, Fri
INBOX
Timing looks like hell. Will appear choreographed. All major news
networks literally leading with "AG to accept FBI D’s
recommendation."
2016-07-01
11:30:47, Fri
OUTBOX
Yeah, that is awful timing. Nothing we can do about it. \U0001f615
2016-07-01
11:31:16, Fri
What 1 meantvwas, did DOJ tell us yesterday they were doing this,
so D added that language.
2016-07-01
11:31:50, Fri
INBOX
Yep. 1 told Bill the same thing. Delaying just makes it worse.
2016-07-01
11:35:23, Fri
OUTBOX
And yes. 1 think we had some warning of it. 1 know they sent some
statement to rybrcki, be he called andy.
2016-07-01
11:35:57, Fri
OUTBOX
And yeah, it's a real profile in couragw, since she knows no charges
will be brought. \U0001f612
2016-07-01
11:36:36, Fri
INBOX
And now the NYT news alert...
2016-07-01
11:40:03, Fri
INBOX
It's a shame because now it begins to tarnish even the FBI's good
name. Very irritating. \n\nAnyway.
2016-07-01
14:50:13, Fri
INBOX
You hopefully tune in for AG comments at 11 if you haven't left...
2016-07-01
15:25:26, Fri
INBOX
But AGs talking now. Said she had decided to accept rec prior to
meeting with Clinton on Monday
2016-07-01
15:25:50, Fri
INBOX
Keeps calling it "investigation of State Department emails." Uh, not
exactly....
DOJ-PROD-0000167
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-07-01
17:44:39, Fri
2016-07-01
17:47:55, Fri
2016-07-01
17:48:38, Fri
2016-07-01
17:49:32, Fri
2016-07-01
17:56:08, Fri
2016-07-01
18:01:45, Fri
2016-07-01
18:29:13, Fri
2
2
BP-
2016-07-01
20:39:33, Fri
2016-07-01
21:44:56, Fri
2016-07-01
21:52:34, Fri
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
And dang it, I'm hoping to catch Rybicki to throw out the Q. of
watching, caveated with the acknowledgment of complete
undertaking of the million reasons the answer may be "no," alas,
[without success. _
Did you end up telling Andy about what I told you about the
j stuff, or did Bill broach it?
\UQ001f6121. _
All his DADs and SCs sat there staring at their hands. ...someone
asked him why the change, he said that was for him to know....
Bill talked to him about it last night, i talked, to andy about it today
again. He is going to broach it with DAG extra week, but he wants
CD and CyD to have a plan for review.
Any intrigue on the MYE front? \n\nAnd damn it's going to be
miserable to have you away for a
week.\U0001f636\U0001f636\U0001f636\U0001f636
No, didn’t talk about mye except for if I saw the lynch articles.
Going in to wrap with Bill. This ought to be interesting.
INBOX
Oof. Hi. Sounds like a comparatively reduced - stress day, though.
\u263a\n\nJust talked to Andy for an hour. Have MANY details for
you. Have to write something with Jon and low, let me know
if you want/can talk around 4:45 or later?
OUTBOX
Yes, he mentioned you were meeting. Let me know when you are
free to talk.
OUTBOX
Did you guys ever write the disclaimer on the Ihm?
OUTBOX
Damn. Just saw your article.
INBOX
Writing that now. And yes, damn re article. Says the FBI declined
comment. Great job, NPO.
OUTBOX
What were they supposed to say?
INBOX
Nothing! But they were supposed to give us a heads up instead of
the dead silence we got!!!!
UNBOX
i
This is *slightly* notable news
;INBOX
FYI the thing Jon just sent DoJ is having real agita about. 1 have
talked with both Laufman and explained the reason why
we want it.
OUTBOX
Why would they have an issue?
2
DOJ-PROD-OOOOI 68
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-07-02
10:49:24, Sat
2016-07-02
10:50:47, Sat
2016-07-02
11:10:45, Sat
IOUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
2016-07-01
21:54:42, Frl
INBOX
1 have no idea. The best they could articulate is something that
might imply or be miscontrued as statung we didn't find people
credible.
2016-07-01
21:55:45, Fri
INBOX
Also, 1 think 1 mentioned (but not sure) im not going to brief the
thing about :o Bill until next week.
2016-07-01
INBOX
Ha! I figured it out/ ust told me. Can you talk?
22:19:43, Fri
2016-07-02
INBOX j
Will be in
09:47:44, Sat
office until about 7:45, then yes, sioc.
Look forward to hearing
how today goes.
!Ok. Hang in there
.an't wait to tell you about it
^Anyway, enjoy your morning. Just got Starbucks,
already dealing with issues (all admin, as in, her five attorneys all
wanting to drive into J EH separately because of fear of media
\UQQQlf612l_
2016-07-02
11:21:33, Sat .
INBOX
Ok headed to sioc. Wish us luck. Hope your morning
brightens. \U0001f619\U0001f619\U0001f619\U0001f619
2016-07-02
INBOX
Hey it all went well
16:18:02, Sat
Talking paper with DoJ now. I'll hit you on gmail when
done. lAnd hi
\U0001f636
2016-07-02
18:49:43, Sat
INBOX
Actually, can you talk for 30 secs, work-related?
2016-07-02
INBOX
And damn, DoJ called so didn't respond.
19:42:51, Sat
2016-07-02
21:43:02, Sat
INBOX
And she just gave a phone interview to CNN
2016-07-02
21:49:22, Sat
OUTBOX
What did she say?
2016-07-02
21:58:53, Sat
INBOX
Just she never sent or received anything marked as classified, that
she didn't want to comment on the interview out of respect for the
investigation, that she was glad to have been able to help resolve
the matter.
2016-07-02
23:03:18, Sat
INBOX
Yeah. If we want the draft done for the D tomorrow, post-edit....
2016-07-02
23:22:49, Sat
INBOX
•
Also, talked to He said the two details never talk to each
other.
2016-07-02
23:56:24, Sat
OUTBOX
And hey, remind me brief call with andy. He agrees finding out
those answers probably doesn't change anything, but 1 still think
that he expects you guys to do so, even post-tuesday. Anyway,
we'll talk.
3
DOJ-PROD-0000169
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-07-02
23:59:24, Sat
INBOX
And how do we do investigation after D announces we've
completed it? We believe we know the guy who did brief,
2016-07-03
00:06:46, Sun
OUTBOX
Because the D says he's not going to say complete, just nearly
complete or something like that.
2016-07-03
00:08:10, Sun
INBOX
Ok. We can go there. Any other due
outs? 1 suppose I should just wait to talk to you.
2016-07-03
00:08:48, Sun
OUTBOX
No, just that they both thought it would be important to get the
answer to the questions about her security indoctrination, ongoing
training, etc.
2016-07-03
00:09:07, Sun
OUTBOX
And 1 imagine you can probably just do it by phone.
2016-07-03
00:10:19, Sun
INBOX
True. Of course 1 want to hear what they said when they decided
not to talk about the future on the call...\n'fllS9iS£iS^Si
2016-07-03
00:10:50, Sun
OUTBOX
He didn't talk to me about that.
2016-07-03
00:11:23, Sun
INBOX
Oh. Well, darn. Anything else?
2016-07-03
00:11:34, Sun
INBOX
Rybicki coming in with D tomorrow...
2016-07-03
00:11:48, Sun
OUTBOX
No, not that 1 can think of.
2016-07-03
00:12:12, Sun
OUTBOX
Man, 1 so want to be there. You going in?
2016-07-03
00:12:52, Sun
INBOX
No. They most certainly would not invite me up/in.
2016-07-03
00:13:08, Sun
INBOX
What are they doing? Rehearsing?
2016-07-03
00:13:27, Sun
OUTBOX
That's my guess.
2016-07-03
00:17:20, Sun
INBOX
Is Andy going in tomorrow? And have you asked to see the all
employee email?
2016-07-03
00:18:04, Sun
OUTBOX
1 don't know if he is. Good question. I'll ask tomorrow or Monday.
Remind me.
INBOX
2016-07-03
12:48:33, Sun
INBOX
Waiting for to get back from a run, Kendall apparently
called him last night.
2016-07-03 OUTBOX
12:49:08, Sun
Hmm. Wonder what for? Obviously, let me know when you know.
DOJ-PROD-OOOOI70
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-07-03
12:52:51, Sun
INBOX
2016-07-03
12:55:21, Sun
INBOX
\n\nl sent you the redacted secret 302 last night
along with everyone else. Might as well, plus, gives you a reason if
want to fle e tn eras... _1_
Did you read the nyt write up this morning? \n\nThe interview had
been weeks in the making as law enforcement officials and Mrs.
Clinton\u2019s team coordinated schedules. Democrats also
hoped that holding the interview on a holiday weekend might ease
the anticipated storm.\n\nln a telephone interview with Chuck
Todd on MSNBC after her meeting, Mrs. Clinton said,
\u201cl\u2D19ve been eager to do it, and I was pleased to have
the opportunity to assist the department in bringing its review to a
conclusion.\u201d\n\nAccompanying Mrs. Clinton into the
I meeting were her lawyer David E. Kendall; Cheryl D. Miils and
!Heather 5amueIson, longtime aides who are also lawyers; and two
lawyers from Mr. Kendall\u2019s firm, Williams & Connolly,
Katherine Turner and Amy Saharia.\n\nEight officials from the
1F.B.I. and the Department of Justice conducted the interview,
‘according to a person who was familiar with the substance of the
session but declined to be named because the meeting was
private. This person characterized the meeting as
\u201ccivil\u201d and \u201cbusinesslike.\u201d
2016-07-03 INBOX
12:55:57, Sun
2016-07-03 INBOX
12:58:32, Sun
2016-07-03
13:06:19, Sun
2016-07-03
13:07:43, Sun
OUTBOX
INBOX
Eight, because Peking DoJ is ridiculous. What I didn't say in the
conference call is that and comments were largely
unnecessary... _
Mrs. Clinton had no public events scheduled on Saturday, but after
her F.B.I. interview she and her husband, former President Bill
Clinton, went to New York and saw the Broadway show
\u20 1cH amilton.\u20 1d_
8. It's really pathetic.
Yep. Exactly what I thought,
And NO ONE will call what the of them think or say or write.
2016-07-03
13:14:33. Sun
2016-07-03
13:32:32, Sun
2016-07-03
13:55:48, Su n
2016-07-03 ’
13:56:41. Sun
OUTBOX
I know. Whatever.lt's fine. We'll have the last laugh.
Just talked to I'm writing a unet Email now, I will include
you. H e alr eady told Toscas _
F*ck Pck Pck
Separate matter,Bill said he would pass the unclassified email 1 just
sent to DD
5
DOJ-PROD-OOOOI71
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-07-03
15:17:45, Sun
OUTBOX
Why the cursing above? 1 read the email, didn't find it that
troubling.
2016-07-03
15:26:58, Sun
INBOX
A) I'm sorry. 1 figured it would be :(\nB) high side email. JB noted
something that had a carry-over paragraph on the next page. First
part was redacted, second wasn't. It's all marked s, question is
whether it should be higher. 1 don't think it is (and hey, had a
person who was one of the highest ranking OCAs in the govt at the
time tel! me yesterday she thought it was U \U0001f612), but just
embarrassing. Then, in my "hey heads up don't forward
attachment and treat this as higher until we get this sorted out, i
cited the wrong page. \U0001f621 Because that also has
something which is arguable. Why 1 hate sending drafts around.
\i mnnirmi_:_ .. . .. „
2016-07-03
15:27:08, Sun
INBOX
1 know we don't have have a choice given timing.
2016-07-03
15:50:47, Sun
OUTBOX
It's okay. Everyone understands what a crunch you're under.
2016-07-03
17:30:27, Sun
INBOX
1 DO want to talk to you a bout con vo with
Andv and the email 1 sent this morning.
2016-07-03
19:48:13, Sun
INBOX
1 need to call Bill back though.
2016-07-03
20:17:16, Sun
INBOX
Talked things thru with Bill. I'm glad 1 can be a voice of calm, a
security blanket.
2016-07-03
20:28:36, Sun
OUTBOX
What's bill freaking out about now?
2016-07-03
20:30:05, Sun
INBOX
Interview, W&C comments, his convo with Andy (sounds similar to
yours), what more we could do, if we're on the right path,
managing uncertainty and fear and doubt.
2016-07-03
20:33:12, Sun
OUTBOX
I'm glad he has you too.
2016-07-03
21:12:45, Sun
INBOX
Re-reading, for like the billionth time, his statement. And fact
checking again....
2016-07-03
23:10:34, Sun
OUTBOX
you shouldn't be worrying about Tuesday, that isn't what
matters.’
2016-07-04
16:03:40, Mon
INBOX
\n\nNo determination from State yet about whether
they were classified at the time. \n\nBased on above, 1 think it
reasonable to say we believe emails with portions
marked (C) in the bodies are classified (C) now and by extension
(current classification and contemporaneous marking) were
classified at the time.
6
DOJ-PROD-0000172
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-07-04
1.6:24:10, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-07-04
16:24:49, Mon
INBOX
(IMlI
OUTBOX
2016-07-04
16:27:37, Mon
INBOX
2016-07-04
17:19:06, Mon
INBOX
2016-07-04
17:32:53, Mon
INBOX
2016-07-04
19:07:37, Mon
IN80X
2016-07-04
23:49:36, Mon
INBOX
2016-07-04
23:50:05, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-07-05
00:12:32, Tue
INBOX
2016-07-05
00:12:43, Tue
INBOX
2016-07-05
10:44:23, Tue
INBOX
2016-07-05
11:25:21, Tue
INBOX
2016-07-05
11:27:25, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-07-05
11:27:56, Tue
INBOX
2016-07-05
15:59:55, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-07-05
17:58:25, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-07-05
18:27:35, Tue
INBOX
2016-07-05
18:29:05, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-07-05
18:29:55, Tue
INBOX
2016-07-05
18:30:29, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-07-05
18:30:36, Tue
INBOX
Hey note that Jon and are cc:ed on the email I just sent you
Talk? I am almost certain Bill will call and forward to and/or discuss
with Andy. _
Just talked to Bill...he's going to think about whether or not to pass
on. Has some concern that this is late, and whether it's worth
changing given all the practice that like happened yesterday. I told
him he could always bounce off of Andy or JR to get their thoughts.
But HUGE day.
Which I get to share with you
!tod while it was open, I
didn't take "Andy's" spot... _
Done! I think literally less than two minutes
Unbelievable.
What? I TOLD them...\U0001f609~ ’
Sorry, just wanted to know what was going on. Andy just calling
George. Standby. _ . _
Bummer. Didn't know Andy was going to be down there too.:{
Turn on CNN. State news conference
I know. Dude is getting BEAT UP.
God I still want to watch all this with you!!!! \U0001f636
I'm waiting for andy to show back up! The d is back, no due where
he is?! _
Will tell you what the D said, too. Andy brought up messaging the
workforce,but then the D cam around our side of the room.
7
DOJ-PROD-0000173
Strzok-Pase Texts
2016-07-05
18:31:28, Tue
INBOX
Hmm. Me either. 1 assume they were together. 1 saw the D, and he
was with people, 1 assumed JR and Andy. But 1 didn't get a positive
ID on the other two
2016-07-05
18:34:35, Tue
INBOX
You find him?
2016-07-05
18:36:18, Tue
INBOX
You still listening? Poor guy...we're going to need to address with
State
2016-07-05
18:46:07, Tue
INBOX
Hey there's a uc meeting in my office in 15.1 may go to.your office
or bubble to hang out. Any sense of schedule later?
2016-07-05
19:05:23, Tue
OUTBOX
Oops, just walked in on your unit meeting but you weren't there!
Headed to my ofc now
2016-07-05
19:06:04, Tue
INBOX
K with Bill stop by if you wNt
2016-07-05
19:06:08, Tue
INBOX
Want
2016-07-05
19:08:55, Tue
OUTBOX
In bills ofc? 1 just got back to my ofc
2016-07-06
16:39:41, Wed
INBOX
Ooh. Just heard something from Bill that's going to make you
\u0001f621\u0001f621\u000lf621\u0001f621\u0001f621\u000
lf621\U0001f621 let me go by bubble and will call you
2016-07-06
17:03:59; Wed
INBOX
Also, Fox reporting D is testifying tomorrow...Bill was not at the
prep session this morning. Not sure what's happening, but
coordination does not appear to be ideal.
2016-07-06
17:34:03, Wed
INBOX
On the phone with
2016-07-06
17:34:38, Wed
OUTBOX
Rgr. Call when you are done.
2016-07-06
19:03:09, Wed
INBOX
Hi. Watching D with
2016-07-06
19:12:45, Wed
INBOX
No, would take too long. He did really well.
'
2016-07-06
19:13:05, Wed
INBOX
Will tell you all about it, of course
2016-07-06
19:13:52, Wed
OUTBOX
Ooh, 1 want to know now!
2016-07-06
19:15:52, Wed
INBOX
Listening to Andy then have to call this person in USD(i) then mtg
outside of Andy's at 3:45
2016-07-06
19:55:33, Wed
INBOX
Heading into mtg with AG....
2016-07-06
19:56:25, Wed
OUTBOX
Can't wait to hear about it. Ask Jim about the BB holes in the wall
from rfk's kids.
2016-07-06
OUTBOX
20:40:51, Wed
2016-07-06
21:43:05, Wed
INBOX
1 didn't ask.
2016-07-06
21:43:56, Wed
INBOX
Pretty cool, she just accepted the unanimous recommendation.
Statement from her tonight.
DOJ-PROD-OOOOI74
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-07-06
21:44:04, Wed
INBOX
2016-07-06
21:45:55, Wed
INBOX
2016-07-06
21:47:34, Wed
OUTBOX
2016-07-06
21:50:36, Wed
OUTBOX
2016-07-06
22:16:55, Wed
INBOX
2016 07-06
23:03:21, Wed
OUTBOX
2016-07-06
23:03:25, Wed
2016-07-06
23:14:06, Wed
2016-07-07
01:14:05. Thu
2016-07-07
10:21:45, Thu
2016-07-07
10:23:18, Thu
2016-07-07
1 0:24:42, Thu
2016-07-07
10:36:34, Thu
2016-07-07
10:50:24, Thu
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
2016-07-07
11:49:17, Thu
INBOX
2016-07-07
12:28:27, Thu
INBOX
2016-07-07
12:47:58, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-07-07
12:49:15, Thu i
INBOX
2016-07-07
13:43:39, Thu
INBOX
2016-07-07
14:21:45, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-07-07
INBOX
14:22:18, Thu I
Remind me. Bill talked to Andy about me and the DAD job
Are you going to watch his testimony at 10? Do you have cspan?
I'm going to try. so we'll see.
I will when we get back.
Thought this was spot on.\n\nHil!ary Clinton: Ma\u2019am
Survivor http://nyti.ms/29z00ku
Also think I need to ask for their gross negligence analysis -
he made a point of telling me last night that Rybicki had asked for
it (which is smart, there was a lot of discussion about it yesterday
which was helpful for the D> -1 think I'm going to be doing more
education than I anticipated
Sent that nyt article
I'm so sorry \n\nUnrelated, you're going to need to tell me to be a
little bit less of a control freak about the case. It’s out, there are a
hundred people doing things, and I'm not going to be able (or
need) to mana ge all of it and ensure its right.... _:_
Actually the case is over. So it's not yours to control
a nym ore._
Yes. I need you to say things like that, \u263a
You have time for a quick work call?
God I hate Congress. So utterly worthless.
Less than worthless. Contemptible.
9
DOJ-PROD-0000175
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-07-07
14:22:45, Thu
OUTBOX
That's exactly right.
2016-07-07
14:23:40, Thu
INBOX
God he is SO GOOD
2016-07-07
14:23:53, Thu
OUTBOX
1 know. Brilliant public speaker.
2016-07-07
14:24:23, Thu
OUTBOX
And brilliant distillation of fact.
2016-07-07
14:27:13, Thu
INBOX
Yep. Chaffetz is in over his head
2016-07-07
14:27:28, Thu
OUTBOX
1 was just about to say the same thing.
2016-07-07
14:28:50, Thu
OUTBOX
And chaffetz is trying to be so measured. But it's so phony.
2016-07-07
17:29:16, Thu
INBOX
"Celebrity hunting" was Margolis 1 phrase yesterday.
2016-07-07
17:55:02, Thu
INBOX
He just walked it back
2016-07-07
18:35:11, Thu .
OUTBOX
We need to get him a better answer re the lawyers.point being,
they had no clue classified was on there until the info was
produced to state and they started protecting it via foia
2016-07-07
18:36:09, Thu
INBOX
Exactly. And mills and Kendall had ts clearances during sort
2016-07-07
18:36:28, Thu
INBOX
Still checking on Samuelson
2016-07-07
18:36:45, Thu
OUTBOX
1 called andy, but in ses board. Has team been watching?
2016-07-07
18:36:54, Thu
INBOX
Some, yes
2016-07-07
18:38:54, Thu
INBOX
1 have lots of input but seems intentional decision by 7th floor to
not watch live (or prep yesterday). Assume there are good reasons
for it. Whatever. \n\nD fixed Petraeus statement
called me to give me a heads up Andy had called
him about where he was getting the attic story from. Have that
storv. too.
2016-07-07
18:40:13, Thu
INBOX
"Reporch"?
2016-07-07
18:41:09, Thu
OUTBOX
Yeah, 1 heard re petraeus.
2016-07-07
18:59:03, Thu
INBOX
Also the non paper answer wasn’t correct. Let me know if you free
up and I'll tell you about the AG mtg
2016-07-07
19:02:10, Thu
INBOX
And the SAC svtc
2016-07-07
19:06:48, Thu
INBOX
! did get a chuckle out of D's gotta pee joke...
2016-07-07
19:08:26, Thu
OUTBOX
Everyone did. That's why he's as good at this as he is. ■
10
DOJ-PROD-0000176
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-07-07
19:41:36, Thu
INBOX
Sorry for delay. Bill stopped in to tell me about convo he had with
Andy
2016-07-07 '
19:44:43, Thu
INBOX
About me
2016-07-07
19:45:11, Thu
OUTBOX
Oh yeah! About dad? Talk now?
2016-07-07
20:46:45, Thu
INBOX
OPA is f*eking up
2016-07-07
20:47:19, Thu
OUTBOX
Yeah, saw your email. Andy is in an see board, there needs to be
centralized decision making on this. Call rybicki direct?
2016-07-07
20:47:25, Thu
INBOX
NP. Had a gut instinct which just confirmed.
2016-07-07
20:47:33, Thu
OUTBOX
What's that?
2016-07-07
20:50:39, Thu
INBOX
Check your email. ielding all kinds of calls about
misstatements or clarification to D's testimony and as best i can
tell, asking me and for answers so she
can respond right back. \n\nMy Q- for a D speech on something
like this, shouldn't SOMEONE in the D/DD's office chop before we
2016 07 08
01:25:45, Fri
2016-07-08
02: 05:44, Fri
2016-07-08
12:5 8:07, Fri
2016-07-08
13:19:45, Fri
liuBI
2016-07-07
23:51:35, Thu
OUTBOX
BBC News: US State Department restarts Hillary Clinton email
probe\nUS State Department restarts Hillary Clinton email probe -
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2016-36742095
2016-07-07
23:54:24, Thu
INBOX
Funny. That was our agreement, but of the BILLION things they've
told us recently, this wasn't one of them. \n\nBtw, this place goes
to shit without you here. Last 24 hours were sideways disaster,
finally stepped in at mv urging
2016-07-08
00:00:00, Fri
INBOX
And hi. Finally left, with 200 pages of transcript to read tonight.
2016-07-08
00:52:40, Fri
INBOX
Oh! You know what J told me? Andy apologized to
following the AG brief!!!!!!deserves no such thing,
let alone from the DD. \n\nl get/hope he was trying to help out me
and others at the working kevel, which I really appreciate, but still.
OUTBOX
Yeah, that's really annoying. Apologized for what?
INBOX
The surprise of the statement.
INBOX
Oh, and fun fact before 1 forget. D said average G1S public call line
volume is like 14/hour. After his speech, it went over 700....
INBOX
Still reading testimony.
INBOX
At least five police are dead, *U0001f626\U0001f621
OUTBOX
Yeah, 1 know. It's incredibly scary and awful.
11
DOJ-PROD-OOOOI77
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-07-08
13:21:16, Fri-
INBOX
1 worry where the dialogue goes from here
2016-07-08
13:23:38, Fri
OUTBOX
It’s not good.
2016-07-08
13:50:52, Fri
INBOX
And probably not charitable, but looking back, I’m a *little*
frustrated Moffa wasn't here this week...
2016-07-08
13:51:43, Fri
OUTBOX
1 know. But that's not his fault.
\U0001f&lf
2016-07-08
14:14:24, Fri
INBOX
Going to review and rpHline D testimony at 1030. Who should get
that - JR, youy
2016-07-08
14:15:57, Fri
OUTBOX
Get what, the redimes? Yeah, sounds right. Why Just be of
Steinbach's involvement going forward?
2016-07-08
14:18:57, Fri
INBOX
Yes re Should I not, at least on this? He wasn't involved in
testimony prep
2016-07-08
14:19:31, Fri
INBOX
Plus he may be voting on the DAD job soon...
2016-07-08
14:20:09, Fri
OUTBOX
There's no harm in including her, 1 suppose.
2016-07-08
14:20:25, Fri
INBOX
Or ask to ask Andy who he wants to have it? mentioned it to
him last night
2016-07-08
14:20:26, Fri
INBOX
That’s probably smartest
14:31:00, Fri
2016-07-08
17:38:14, Fri
2016-07-08
20:19:38, Fri
2016-07-08
20:41:57, Fri
2016-07-08
20:45:19, Fri
2016-07-08
21:20:34, Fri
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
2016-07-08
14:21:12, Fri
OUTBOX
Yup. That's the right move.
2016-07-08
14:22:22, Fri
INBOX
His transcript is even more impressive than hearing it spoken.
Concise/crisp and accurate
2016 07-08
OUTBOX
He's amazing.! mean, think about it. He spoke for four and a half
14:25:05, Fri
hours straight, and made virtually no errors. It's incredibly
impressive.
2016-07-08
INBOX
Heading up to SIOC. You may be home when I'm done!
Emersencv meeting, huh? This ouehta be eood. Just finished lunch.
Not good. He threw DOJ a lifeline and politicized his position.
That's the general consensus from everyone I've spoken to. One
current SAC was shocked and dismayed. I'm sure you're swamped
but let's ca tch up next week. _
iGod that really offends me.
iRead it in the context of the Wittes piece I just emailed.
Of course re JB's email please make sure someone invites us to any
meeting Mon morning. Thanks
2016-07-08
21:46:01, Fri
OUTBOX
I have no idea how to get you invited. It will probably just be a
holdover from morning mtg, not something scheduled. _
12
DOJ-PROD-0000178
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-07-08
21:46:43, Fri
OUTBOX
Maybe email Jim back individually and ask him.his thoughts about
the best way for you to be there if it will just be a morning meeting
holdover?
2016-07-08
22:00:04, Fri
INBOX
1 guess. Bill is outnall next week, so that doesnt help. 1 may grab
and Jon (don't think 1 can exclude him) and just stand in the
hallway. When do thev normally finish?
2016-07-08
22:00:51, Fri
INBOX
And just talked to my State DS counterpart about their parh ahead,
so have that nugget 1 can offer to the convo...
2016-07-08
22:23:17, Fri
INBOX
Hrc just on pbs news hour
2016-07-08
22:45:38, Fri
INBOX
And meanwhile, we have Black Lives Matter protesters, right now,
chanting "no justice no peace" around DoJ and the White House...
2016-07-08
23:15:13, Fri
OUTBOX
That's awful.
2016-07 08
23:19:08, Fri
INBOX
Also, comfort dog stopped by unannounced today, because the
handler figured we needed it!!!!!\U0001f60a
2016-07-08
23:20:05, Fri
OUTBOX
Okay, that's really really awesome re the comfort dogs. I'll have to
have Andy thank them. Which handler?
HU
INBOX
Don't remember her name.
2016-07-08
23:23:14, Fri
OUTBOX
Got it. Thanks.
2016-07-08
23:25:14, Fri
INBOX
and the other woman's name is...?
2016-07-09
20:26:01, Sat
INBOX
Oh, and remind me random irritation from.Thursday...while
vas bugging the hell out of me, apparently Kortan was doing
the same to ,U0001f621
2016-07-09
20:26:33, Sat
INBOX
1 should let go...everyone made it through and nothing TOO
terrible happened...
2016-07-10
01:17:02, Sun
INBOX
Maybe. But if you follow Andy out the door in two years, this is
truly de minimus.
2016-07-10
01:17:27, Sun
INBOX
I’m going to fight like hell to keep you in. Just saying
2016-07-10
01:18:22, Sun
INBOX
Oh. And JB gave me another big arm around the shoulder hug after
meeting the AG on Wed.
2016-07-10
01:20:21, Sun
OUTBOX
He's proud of you. 1 think it's really cute.
2016-07-10
01:22:24, Sun
INBOX
1 didn’t get the chance to ask about the BBs. But 1 did sit and stare
at the portrait of Elliot Richardson staring at me.
2016-07-10
01:22:44, Sun
INBOX
It's next to the portrait of Eric Holder, which is wildly offensive.
2016-07-10
INBOX
Got the Sunday blues, bad.
18:33:39, Sun
Maybe its Midyear post-partum. Gotta find something at
work to motivate me.\n\nYou?
13
DOJ-PROD-OOOOI79
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-07-11
10:10:24, Mon
INBOX
Worried about work, 1 think. How much we decide to release, the
prospect of second guessing. The IG doing that bugs me; Congress
doing so infuriates me.
2016-07-11
12:01:33, Mon
OUTBOX
Hey just remembered won't be in this morning
2016-07-11
12:21:36, Mon
INBOX
Oh well then. Saw our 3-4. If anything before then, 1 guess they can
find me and Jon if needed
2016-07-11
12:23:08, Mon
INBOX
Just brought up to speed. How's traffic?
2016-07-11
OUTBOX
He was in? 1 didn't expect him to be.
12:28:53, Mon
2016-07-11 INBOX Sorry Moffa, not
12:29:22, Mo n_
2016-07-11 INBOX Oh god. It looked like hell. \n\nTalkig to Bill again.
21:49:09, Mon ___
2016-07-11 | INBOX And interested in any feedback from DIA call if you get any....
21:49:42, Mon _
2016-07-11 INBOX You read the referral yet?
22:30:01, Mon _
2016-07-11 INBOX We really want to drop the LHM and 302s into that environment?
22:30:48, Mon_
2016-07-11 ; OUTBOX . Yes. More of the same. Actually, it's pretty insulting given that the
22:31:04, Mon I _ Director almost 5 hours up there on Thursday. _
2016-07-11 lOUTBOX I know. I’m going to talk to Andy about it. I'm deeply nervous about
22:31:37, Mon _ it too. _._
2016-07-11 INBOX Bill wanted to know if he should call him, send some articles.
22:32:22, Mon _
2016-07-11 OUTBOX Call whom? Andy?
22:3 2:39, Mon _
2016-07-11 INBOX Yes, Andy. I sent him the Wittes article, and I think he saw the
22:35:36, Mon Miller one calling it an abuse of power, \n\nl just have no faith in
Congress to respect our investigative information. The LHM and no
more. Not even senior people's 302, unless what we'd release via
_ foia. ____
2016-07-11 INBOX
22:38:59, Mon _
2016-07-11
INBOX
\n\nJust read the
23:57:48, Mon
Congressional letter to the D. Also CNN poll. Has me stressed out.
2016-07-12
00:25:59, Tue 1
INBOX
Hi. Fallowing up prep, 1 just reread the Deutch IG report. 1 see no
reference to written classified material. 1 will re-read again, and if
I'm right, will let JR. JB and you know.
14
DOJ-PROD-OOOOI80
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-07-12
00:48:53, Tue
OUTBOX
1 don't want to talk about work though - this all stresses me out
too.
2016-07-12
10:43:42, Tue
INBOX
Was glad to see email last night. Had a brief exchange
with Moffa before then about our control tendencies / issues. 1
think my underlying worry, outside of the simple unease with
Congress, is the necessary presence of OCA and OPA (who are both
new to the case} and the heightened role for OGC. Increases the
chance for things to go wrong....
2016-07-12
10:43:49, Tue
INBOX
And yes, it stinks.
2016-07-12
21:47:10, Tue
INBOX
Are you fucking kidding me? This is objectively a great idea and an
easy.- de minimus - lift. \n\nWe suck SO bad sometimes.
2016-07-12
21:47:41, Tue
OUTBOX
1 know. I'm very frustrated.
2016-07-12
21:48:11, Tue
INBOX
They'll probably come up with some worthless rotation schedule
where she spends a half day with each program. \U0001f612
2016-07-12
21:49:06, Tue
INBOX
You want me to cAII her later this week, say she's awesome, we're
trying to recruit her to Cl and this request is legit?
2016-07-12
21:49:11, Tue
OUTBOX
I know. 1 did everything 1 could to bolster what and 1 had
already talked about, but she thought people might be
"concerned" and wanted to talk to folks.
2016-07-12
21:49:30, Tue
OUTBOX
Nope. may just end up doing a detail to cd-4. \U0001f612
2016-07-12
21:49:55, Tue
INBOX
Why would they be concerned? That's stupid
2016-07-12-
21:50:21, Tue
INBOX
Fine. And she can spend a day at wfo as a CD4 detailer. \U0001f606
2016-07-12
21:53:36, Tue
OUTBOX
1 have no idea. And 1 tried to get her to articulate who, and she
wouldn't.
INBOX
They're idiots. And they mistrust nslb.
2016-07-12
22:04:57, Tue
INBOX
God forbid they do something to build bridges
2016-07-12
22:05:59, Tue
INBOX
How long is this tdy supposed to be, anyway?
2016-07-12 OUTBOX 2 or 3 days.
22:17 :54, Tue___
2016-07-12 INBOX Truly. F it. Put her on detail to 4 and I'll send her to Boston or SF
22:19:40, Tu e _ with n o problems. _
2016-07-12 OUTBOX just sent an email which helps explain it some.
2 2:22:11, Tue ■ _
2016-07-12 INBOX Talked with He was not aware of anything happening with
22:43:13, Tue _ new referral other than DC calling odag. _
2016-07-12 | OUTBOX Does he know who in ODAG? That would”be useful to know. Can
22:44:39, Tue _you ask?_
15
DOJ-PROD-0000181
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-07-12
23:06:31, Tue
2016-07-12
23:12:53, Tue
2016-07-13
01:37:44, Wed
2016-07-13
01:39:48, Wed
2016-07-13
10:03:28, Wed
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX 7
OUTBOX
said he didnt know, that it was all second or third hand
info, and that Toscas would know.\n\nl can call DC but that's
stepping on WF's toes. _
Nope. No need.
Though Andy moved MYE
Yeah, I know re mye. I need to move it.
Hey was thinking, let me ask Baker what the meeting with Fine was
about. It might be better not to get Jim deep in the facts of this yet
since he sometimes takes overly cautious/conservative positions.
That work?_
2016-07-13
18:53:08, Wed
INBOX
Disagreement about the 302s. General consensus of our group.is
ALL SESers are to be produced, plus notable private people.
2016-07-13
18:55:29, Wed
OUTBOX
Ah. Yes, that sounds right.
2016-07-13
19:07:47, Wed
OUTBOX
1 missed Andy. Will try again after sac svtc.
2016-07-13
19:37:07, Wed
INBOX
Damn I missed the svtc. Several things for you, will call when
people leave. \n\nAnd hi.
2016-07-13
19:38:16, Wed
OUTBOX
I'm waiting in Andy's ofc.
2016-07-13
19:45:05, Wed
INBOX
Hey its going to take too long to type, along with DOJs reasoning
why they want the changes. You have it on the secret side.
2016-07-13
19:48:06, Wed
OUTBOX
Okay, will do. It's not like it needs to be decided today.
2016-07-13
21:43:12, Wed
INBOX
So of course I'm going to ask you to review my DAD application.
Deadline is 7/21
2016-07-13
21:48:20, Wed
OUTBOX
Of course. It would be my pleasure.
2016-07-13
22:51:26, Wed
INBOX
Sorry was talking with Jason and 1 like them both. Gave Jason
the Ihm and outlined everything.
2016-07-13
23:08:02, Wed
INBOX
Thank you very much re my application. \U0001f636\n\nl think 1
drop the Boston illegals example and add Clinton
2016-07-13
23:55:55, Wed
INBOX
Btw, didn’t get a chance to follow up after this morning. 1) how do
you think it went? Andy seemed a little p*ssed/short on time. His
"let Stephen finish" to me worried me a bit except he d id it to J B
and a bunch of other people, too.\n2) in the wildly unlikely event 1
have to testify (and tell me I'm right about that -1 think it's unlikely
and even less likely I'd go outside of a group). I'm leaning on you to
prep the hell out of me.
2016-07-14
01:33:53, Thu
OUTBOX
Have you read this? It’s really frightening. \n\nFor Whites Sensing
Decline, Donald Trump Unleashes Words of Resistance
http://nvti.ms/29WCu5l
16
DOJ-PROD-0000182
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-07-14
01:35:35, Thu
INBOX
2016-07-14
01:36:32, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-07-14
01:38:52, Thu
INBOX
2016-07-14
11:04:45, Thu
INBOX
2016-07-14
12:28:20, Thu
INBOX
2016-07-14
13:48:35, Thu
2016-07-14
14:45:23 , Thu
2016-07-14
14:57:31. Thu
2016-07-15
10:26:53, Fri
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
I have not. But I think it's clear he's capturing all the white, poor
voters who the mainstream Republicans abandoned in all but
name in the quest for the almighty_$_$_$_$_
tomorrow's logistical plans explode, I'm around to hel
Poll Finds Emails Weighing on Hillary Clinton, Now Tied With
Donald Trump http://nvti.ms/29RV5
Note bcc
m
I'm sorry. That really sucks.
You going to this ogc meeting this afternoon?
Yes. It's mandatory.
Hi. With Moffa. If you think you want to try and hit the farewell
, hit me here„.
ii&usy
We're done talking. Back to texting. I'm going to the house to
shower and pack my suitcase.
2016-07-15
10:46:22, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-07-15
11:03:46, Fri
INBOX
2016-07-15
18:10:12, Fri
INBOX
2016-07-15
21:09:00, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-07-15
21:20:43, Fri
INBOX
2016-07-15
21:21:10, Fri
INBOX
2016-07-15
21:22:02, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-07-15
21:45:51, Fri
INBOX
Hey turns out I only have 3 of your interview appendix
You done yet?
Yep.
About 15;ago, had to talk to my guys
I know. It's crazy, since the military represents secularism in
Turkey.
Can I talk work for a sec?
17
DOJ-PROD-0000183
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-07-18
20:43:03, Mon
2016-07-18
20:47:34, Mon
2016-07-18
20:49:09, Mon
2016-07-18
20:52:18, Mon
2016-07-18
20:52:51, Mon
2016-07-18
20:53:57, Mon
INBOX
OUTBOX
Inbox
| INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
And hi. Just got done with Bill
How's he doing?
Fine. I think pleasantly surprised that last week was comparatively
calm. Went thru the due-outs for this week, \n\nl stayed
afterwards and talked iob with him.
I Sweeney got ny
18
DOJ-PROD-0000184
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-07-19
00:12:19, Tue
INBOX
And are you kidding me? Duck Dynasty now Scott Baio? Ridiculous.
2016-07-19
00:26:49, Tue
OUTBOX
What are you talking about?
2016-07-19
00:27:05, Tue
OUTBOX
Wait, is that who is speaking at the convention?!
2016-07-19
00:27:27, Tue
OUTBOX
Charles in Charge?! That's the best they can do?! Lmfao
2016-07-19
00:27:37, Tue
INBOX
It's PATHETIC!
2016-07-19
00:27:59, Tue
OUTBOX
That unbelievable. My god. Thank god it's not on.
2016-07-19
00:28:44, Tue
INBOX
It's on! PBS!
2016-07-19
00:29:07, Tue
OUTBOX
Yeah, no thanks.
2016-07-19
00:29:56, Tue
INBOX
What did you do? Republican snark. \U0001f636
2016-07-19
INBOX
AND COME ON!!!! TURN ON THE CONVENTION!!!!
00:36:18, Tue
2016-07-19
00:37:04, Tue
INBOX
Pbs/npr joint broadcast sucking so far\U0001f615
2016-07-19
00:37:52, Tue
OUTBOX
NO! 1 WILL NOT BE SUCKED IN!
2016-07-19
00:43:55, Tue
INBOX
TURN IT PBS.
2016-07-19
OUTBOX
00:46:31, Tue
2016-07-19
INBOX
ir, . •
00:48:44, Tue
2016-07-19
INBOX
Oooh, TURN IT ON, TURN IT ON!!! THE DOUCHEBAGS ARE ABOUT
00:57:55, Tue
TO COME OUT. \n\nYou can tell by the excitable clapping.
2016-07-19
INBOX
Aaaaand Mara Liaison is destroying whatever pedestrian respect 1
00:59:52, Tue
had left...
2016-07-19
01:02:24, Tue
INBOX
OOOHHHHH. Now, Antonio Sabato, Jr
2016-07-19
OUTBOX
01:03:14, Tue
2016-07-19
OUTBOX
My god, I'm so embarrassed for them. These are like second-run
01:04:46, Tue
stars. Nothing the B-!ist to relate to the kids these days...
2016-07-19
INBOX
01:05:04, Tue
2016-07-19
INBOX
And oh, Bob Dole!\n\nTHIS IS PATHETIC!!!!
01:05:38, Tue
2016-07-19
01:06:55, Tue
INBOX
And God production of PBS sucks tonight.
19
DOJ-PROD-OOOOI85
5trzok-Page Texts
2016-07-19
02:23:29, Tue
OUTBOX
And wow, Donald Trump is an enormous d*uche.
2016-07-19
INBOX
Hi. How was Trump, other than a douche? Melania?
10:16:23, Tue
2016-07-19
10:18:31, Tue
OUTBOX
Trump barely spoke, but the first thing out of his mouth was "we're
going to win soooo big." The whole thing is like living in a bad
dream.
2016-07-19
10:19:41, Tue
INBOX
Jesus
2016-07-19
10:20:06, Tue
OUTBOX
Melania was perfectly fine, except the whole point of the spouse
talking is to reveal those peesonal stories, what a kind human the
candidate is. There was none of that.
2016-07-19
10:20:38, Tue
INBOX
2016-07-19
10:21:20, Tue
INBOX
That was her job! What the hell did she talk about? Winning
yuuuge?
2016-07-19
11:18:46, Tue
INBOX
Omg. You listening to npr? Apparently Melania's speech had
passages lifted from Michele Obama's....unbelievable
2016-07-19
11:19:25, tue
OUTBOX
NOWAY!
2016-07-19
11:20:06, Tue
OUTBOX
! God, it's just a two-bit organization. 1 do so hope his
disorganization comes to bite him hard in November.
2016-07-19
11:21:13, Tue
INBOX
It HAS to, right? Right?!? Panicked \U0001f628
2016-07-19
17:07:01, Tue
OUTBOX
Just ran into It was like we were old pals...
2016-07-19
18:17:34, Tue
INBOX
Of course! He's not a bad person...
2016-07-19
18:34:51, Tue
OUTBOX
He's just not very good. •
2016-07-19
18:40:41, Tue
OUTBOX
Will you bring a ream of paper?
2016-07-19
19:27:03, Tue
INBOX
Talked to Bill. Thanks for the 26 minute embargo. ;)\n\nLet me
know when you're back, I'll bring paper
2016-07-19
21:32:38, Tue
INBOX
Hey
\U0001f612
says Toscas may call Andy about the LHM preamble.
2016-07-19
21:32:39, Tue
INBOX
You staying for wrap?
2016-07-19
21:33:12, Tue
OUTBOX
Yeah, he mentioned it to me at the meeting, need to tell andy.
2016-07-19
21:37:09, Tue
INBOX
Who mentioned what?
2016-07-19
21:37:12, Tue
INBOX
Please don’t undermine my credibility yet again...when the word is
"this is it, no more changes," and I write, this is final, only it's not,
Pete's word really isn’t what it appears to be, I'll just call
Andy...\U0001f621\U0001f621\U0001f621\U0001f621
20
DOJ-PROD-OOOOI86
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-07-19
21:39:40, Tue
INBOX
I'm not suggesting YOU ever would. You know what I'm saying (1
hope)
2016-07-19
21:40:08, Tue
INBOX
"He" is George? Was he at the neeting?
2016-07-19
21:54:35, Tue
INBOX
I'm really truly sorry. \U0001f614
2016-07-19
22:21:33, Tue
INBOX
Hey do you anticipate Andy will want to meet tomorrow on
Congressional response? Various OGCers asking about deadline...m
2016-07-19
22:22:44, Tue
OUTBOX
No. Jim said he needed letter pushed to Thursday, andy said that
was fine. Not sure about mtg tomorrow.
2016-07-19
22:22:58, Tue
OUTBOX
You guys ready with thoughts re referral?
2016-07-19
22:24:41, Tue
INBOX
1 still haven't seen referral. Lync'd about it earlier. \n\nAnd no.
WF went through it and had comments, but i want to read it
myself. Going to read tonight.
2016-07-19
22:26:15, Tue
OUTBOX
So why are you clamoring for a meeting if you're not ready to talk
about your thoughts re the referral? That's one of the things on the
list, right?
2016-07-19
22:26:43, Tue
OUTBOX
It's one of the emails that got forwarded from Kelly last week, 1
think.
2016-07-19
22:27:03, Tue
INBOX
Phew. I'm really glad. Was feeling just awful. \n\nl‘m NOT
clamoring for a meeting. Everyone is asking if we can have more .
time.
2016-07-19
22:27:18, Tue.
INBOX
Plus, DOJ wants to sit down and do a walk thru of everything for
2016-07-19
22:28:28, Tue
OUTBOX
Bottom line is there is not a meeting scheduled for tomorrow, and
unless people want one, 1 wasn't planning on pushing for one.
2016-07-19
22:29:09, Tue
INBOX
Perfect
2016-07-19
22:57:54, Tue
INBOX
Oh and,re above, 1 meant in haven't seen the draft response. I have
the referral. 1 haven't seen OGC’S draft response.
2016-07-19
23:12:49, Tue
OUTBOX
Oh, got it.
2016-07-20
00:14:02, Wed
INBOX
Hopefully you get home in time for crazy - ass grain storage
pyramid Ben Carson tonight.
2016-07-20 INBOX
00:14:10, Wed
Pence being introduced
2016-07-20 INBOX
00:14:42, Wed
Blech eating late.
2016-07-20
00:55:52, Wed
OUTBOX
I
Omg you need to read the top four most popular on nyt right now.
Kinda makes you feel like this is all a bad dream?...
2016-07-20
00:58:22, Wed
INBOX
Hell, look at the top 6.1 think the downfall of Rome wad like this...
2016-07 20
01:12:03, Wed
OUTBOX
Mitch McConnell always reminds me of a turtle.
21
DOJ-PROD-OOOOI87
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-07-20
01:14:54, Wed
OUTBOX
My god, the crowd looks soooooooo bored.
2016-07-20
01:15:36, Wed
OUTBOX
Ha! No, that's Joseph Lieberman!
2016-07-20
01:22:23, Wed
iNBOX
Amd Paul Ryan's a jerky
2016-07-20
11:17:14, Wed
INBOX
Hey quick request, before you mention and Kelley to Andy,
let me talk to Moffa. While she's on the team, it's his person, and 1
should engage with him before raising it up the chain.
2016-07-20
17:15:39, Wed
OUTBOX
Please. We spent the bulk of the time strategizing how to get you
into that DAD job.
2016-07-20
17:51:08, Wed
OUTBOX
Hey you talk to anyone re Chicago?
2016-07-21
01:12:56, Thu
INBOX
l&MEJiJiust emailed asking when 1 was promoted. They're trying to
shield me from a Fri FOIA release. He suggested 1 tighten my social
media privacy in case they can't. \UQ001f612
2016-07-21
08:52:19, Thu
OUTBOX
This is really shocking.\n\nDona!d Trump Sets Conditions for
Defending NATO Allies Against Attack http://nyti.ms/2ai4u3g
2016-07-21
09:09:58, Thu
OUTBOX
This campaign is like watching a train wreck happen over and over
and over again.\n\nHow Donald Trump Picked His Running Mate
http://nyti.ms/2a8aG9
2016-07-21
09:40:02; Thu
INBOX
Trump is a disaster. 1 have no idea how destabilizing his Presidency
would be
2016-07-21
OUTBOX
09:41:13, Thu
2016-07-21
11:28:14, Thu
INBOX
2016-07-21
11:59:37, Thu
INBOX
And Lisa. Despite my sincerest hopes, you maintain you're leaving
the Bu when Andy does.
1 1'*
2016-07-22
00:43:06, Fri
INBOX
2016-07-22
00:54:14, Fri
INBOX
Maybe. Had a sudden turn to thinking maybe I'll just quit.
\n\nCrank crank crank. \n\nNo reason \U0001f615
2016-07-22
00:55:28, Fri
OUTBOX
Okay, that was a quick turn.
2016-07-22
00:55:46, Fri
INBOX
1 don’t understand the almost derision you had earlier when you
said, "all you agents say that."
22
DOJ-PROD-OOOOI88
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-07-22 OUTBOX When?
00:56: 46, Fri
2016-07-22
00:57:01, Fri
INBOX
And your comment isn't it. Just took a sudden turn to the worse.
2016-07-22
00:57:38, Fri
INBOX
This evening, on the phone. 1 was by the House
2016-07-22
00:58:26, Fri
OUTBOX
No derision, just don’t complain that the fbi doesn't cede ex agents
on the hill when you wouldn't do it either. Everyone's out to make
money.
2016-07-22
02:11:17, Fri
INBOX
Im telling you, its ugly. Grumping about career progression and the
difference in paths based on work topic. Simple question: should
be EAD of intel? Have you had any substantive conversation
with him about any Intel topic?
2016-07-22
02:12:11, Fri
OUTBOX
I don’t talk to anyone about intel. But he does appear to get it.
2016-07-22
02:12:23, Fri
INBOX
Anyway, that. \nl'm not proud of it. \nlt's not right, theres nothing
I'm going to do about it, and 1 should shut up and be petulant in
silence.
2016-07-22
02:12:33, Fri
INBOX
I'm not sure 1 agree
2016-07-22
02:12:49, Fri
OUTBOX
Okay. Well thanks for telling me.
Feel like a dick saying anything in light of your night.
We can talk more about it tomorrow. Mostly, 1 think this is just
about accepting your choices.
2016-07-22
02:14:36, Fri
OUTBOX
Is there anyone in the Bureau who doesn't know that CT is the
most important box to check? You chose not to, for good reason.
2016-07-22
02:14:50, Fri
OUTBOX
That it obviously made me very sad to hear that.
2016-07-22
02:14:56,Fri
INBOX
Whatever.
2016-07-22
02:15:29, Fri
OUTBOX
And if you wanted that career path you could have chosen it.
2016-07-22
02:16:05, Fri
INBOX
It shouldn't be. What will threaten your kids and Andy's kids and
my kids isn't the CT threat. <\nd
someone needs to be smart enough and big enough to realize that
and re prioritize. \n\nWhatever.
2016-07-22
02:17:00, Fri
OUTBOX
So write a note to the Director or something.
2016-07-22
02:17:10, Fri
OUTBOX
Yeah, probably.
2016-07-22
02:17:17, Fri
INBOX
Ha. That'll go a LONG way
OUTBOX
Anonymously,.obviously.
23
DOJ-PROD-0000189
Strzok-Paee Texts
2016-07-22
10:58:38, Fri
INBOX 1
2016-07-22
12:03:05, Fri
INBOX
2016-07-22
12:54:01, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-07-22
13:01:04, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-07-22
13:03:44, Fri
INBOX
2016-07-22
2016-07-22
17:49:28, Fri
2016-07-22
2016-07-22
23:58:47, Fri
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
2016-07-22
13:19:43, Fri
INBOX
2016-07-22
17:49:06, Fri
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
2016-07-22
19:30:08, Fri
INBOX
2016-07-22
19:34:28, Fri
INBOX
2016-07-22
19:43:34, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-07-22
21:50:17, Fri
INBOX
2016-07-22
22:30:16, Fri
INBOX
I'm sending to my 830...\U0001f612
I'm talking to about American exceptionalism right now.
Pretty strongly in favor. As I said to doesn't mean we're perfect or
do everything right, but as a system of government, country of
laws, I think we're pretty damn great.
But there's a difference between that and exceptionalism. Just look
at the word. It implies not only that we're great, but that you suck.
And that we are better and you should change to be like us. It goes
hand in hand with American arrogancism
1 know. I get that. I'm using the term loosely, not in the political
philo soph y way. ___
And plus. I'm explaining why America is great'
\U0001f60a\n\nGoing to have to bail on my offer of ride, just got
called to Bills
And waiting outside his office...\U0001f612
On my way. Have mye Qs.
K here
Mtg just moved to 3:45
K. Maybe after....hour mtg?
Great, sounds fun.
Just yelled at
for 15 minutes if you want to hear about it.
Oh, one more thing, expressed frustration that Fed
Programs won't tell him anything ..._
K. Will mention if Jim calls. \n\nWhat time so they get home?
One sec. and Jim Baker called.
v
Also, Jim Baker said he understood and would think about it.
Oh good.Thank you.
2016-07-23
00:05:58, Sat
INBOX
Did you tell Jim that wildly betrayed his confidence and
needs to pay a price for that?
■
24
DOJ-PROD-0000190
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-07-23
00:07:30, Sat
INBOX
B) Truly, it's like parenting a child (how he should think about
punishing /not rewarding bad behavior). They're just bullies and
we need to Peking grow a pair.
2016-07-24
21:14:27, Sun
OUTBOX
And 1 still need to read Moffa's thing.
2016-07-24
21:15:02, Sun
INBOX
You can read Moffa's thing tomorrow...won't take long.
2016-07-24
21:16:47, Sun
INBOX
Did you bring it home?
2016-07-24
21:17:04, Sun
INBOX
Moffa's thing
2016-07-24
21:17:05, Sun
OUTBOX
Oh the document? Yes.
2016-07-24
INBOX
Or via eras?
21:17:15, Sun
2016-07-24
OUTBOX
then read Moffa's thing,
23:26:28, Sun
mamm
INBOX
Boo. Though I've got to read it too. Going the eras route...
2016-07-24
23:47:30, Sun
OUTBOX
Though 1 will say it's a little bit of a challenge to read since 1 don't
know her 302, and there's no commentary about why a particular
Dassaee was chosen.
2016-07-24
INBOX
23:51:00, Sun
1
2016-07-24
23:51:38, Sun
OUTBOX Ah. So there's not necessarily an inconsistency hidden in there. Got
it. Thanks, that helps.
2016-07-24
23:51:49, Sun
INBOX And yeah, without the 302 I'm not sure how much vou can really
do other than familiarize yourself.
INBOX
No. Many - most - are fully consistent. Maybe even all.
2016-07-24
23:53:28, Sun
OUTBOX
Got into a disagreement with my two State friends. Nothing major,
just making excuses for how they do business.
2016-07-24
23:53:40, Sun ;
OUTBOX
Remind me tomorrow.
2016-07-24
23:54:02, Sun
INBOX
Well they have a decades long pattern of it.
2016-07-25
00:09:56, Mon
OUTBOX
Jesus, did you read this?\n\n!s Donald Trump a Racist?
http://nyti.ms/2aiqD08
2016-07-25
00:31:40, Mon
INBOX
Wildly unrelated, still chief judge of the fisc?
OUTBOX
Don't think so. Just wiki the Fisc judges. It will tell you.
2016-07-25
00:33:29, Mon
OUTBOX
25
DOJ-PROD-OOOOI91
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-07-25
OUTBOX
00:34:40, Mon
2016-07-25
OUTBOX
00:35:07, Mon
2016-07-25
INBOX
has lined up a Cl threat briefing for in advance of
00:35:20, Mon
her travel to . 1 want to get ci training lined up for the
whole federal judiciary. I'm worried were sending the wrong folks
to do the briefing.
2016-07-25
INBOX
1 did. We talked about it before and after. 1 need to get together
00:35:33, Mon
with him
2016-07-25
00:35:43, Mon
OUTBOX
5o get the right folks in then!
2016-07-25
OUTBOX
You didn’t tell me. \U0001f615
00:36:02, Mon
2016-07-25
00:36:19, Mon
INBOX
1 just emailed him and that he 1 and 1 should do it.
2016-07-25
00:36:24, Mon
INBOX
Ididl
2016-07-25
00:37:18, Mon
OUTBOX
No, you definitely didn't.
2016-07-25
INBOX
1 am almost certain 1 did. It may have been in passing in another
00:38:21, Mon
discussion, but 1 have a memory of it.
2016-07-25
OUTBOX
1 think that makes sense. Remind me to tell you frustrating
00:38:32, Mon
convo 1 had with
2016-07-25
00:39:00, Mon
INBOX
Ok. He won't let some things go....
2016-07-25
00:39:13, Mon
OUTBOX
1 honestly truly don't think you did. I'm serious. 1 would have
remembered that. It's too central in my life. »■ Mil
2016-07-25
INBOX
■
00:40:11, Mon
_1
2016-07-25
OUTBOX
Well 1 have zero recollection of it. Recent, old, on phone, in person.
00:41:16, Mon
text, nothing.
2016-07-25
INBOX
4
00:41:44, Mon
2016-07-25
INBOX
In person.
00:41:54, Mon
2016-07-25
INBOX
■
00:42:30, Mon
2016-07-25
00:42:50, Mon
INBOX
Was Moffa's thing low side or high side? Can't find it
2016-07-25
00:43:09, Mon
INBOX
Oops, just found it
2016-07-25
00:43:10, Mon ,
OUTBOX
High.
26
DOJ-PROD-0000192
2016-07-25 OUTBOX
100:44:07, Mon
2016-07-25
00:44:47, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-07-25
00:50:43, Mon
INBOX
2016-07-25
00:52:07, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-07-25
00:52:23, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-07-25
00:53:08, Mon
INBOX
2016-07-25
00:53:55, Mon
INBOX
2016-07-25
00:56:24, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-07-25
01:00:00, Mon
INBOX
2016-07-25
01:08:13, Mon
INBOX
2016-07-25
01:08:23, Mon
INBOX
2016-07-25 OUTBOX
01:08:35, Mon !
2016-07-25
OUTBOX
10:29:56, Mon
2016-07-25
10:31:41, Mon
INBOX
2016-07-25
10:32:37, Mon
INBOX
2016-07-25
10:35:59, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-07-25
OUTBOX
10:36:55, Mon
2016-07-25
INBOX
10:43:24, Mon
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-07-25
14:25:10, Mon
2016-07-25
15:27:46, Mon
2016-07-25
17:01:16, Mon
2016-07-25
22:49:39, Mon
2016-07-25
23:44:38, Mon
2016-07-26
01:52:30, Tue
2016-07-26
01:55:25, Tue
2016-07-26
02:03:00, Tue
2016-07-26
02:03:15, Tue
2016-07-26
02:03:38, Tue_
2016-07-26
02:05:46, Tue
2016-07-26
02:06:0 2, T ue
2016-07-26
02:07:02, Tue^
2016-07-26
02:08:11, Tue
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
i INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
I INBOX
Have to brief this guy from hpsci at 2
Was talking to andy, then rybicki, then new counsel guy.
Did Baker decide whether he's participating in call?
Have not had a chance to ask, but I did check his calendar for today
and tom orrow and didn't see it . _
Hey having a quick mtg with Bill,
Talking to Bill, want to catch up with you later. \U0001f615
Leave = jeh, not Andy's office, right?
now about to read mye letter
while I listen to Corey booker. He's doing v e ry well. _
Hev, in case you haven't already, can you answer Jim's question re
I
letter? I thought Bakers comments w oro "k \n\nir'
to me how much better this convention is.
Which one
Btw, anv more discussion about JB not joining the call with
tomorrow?
It's SO much more positive.
f haven't heard anything more from Jim.
Sigh. was really upset.
And so so so much better organized and coordinated than the rnc.,
Really upset that he would join the call? I get it.:(
Yes. And even more at and what she thought was utterly
u n prof essional behavior on his part. Which I also get. _
I just hope if JB participates, that somebody preps him. Because I'm
not sure he knows the points to make on the call.\n\nMe too.
U0001f636
28
DOJ-PROD-OOOOI94
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-07-26
02:30:57, Tue
INBOX
Here’s what I'm about to send everyone in answer to JBs question
about
2016-07-26
02:34:22, Tue
OUTBOX
Hmm. Should we send that? Maybe just find a quick moment to
discuss it with him tomorrow?
2016-07-26
02:35:29, Tue
INBOX
Either way. 1 want him to have the answer. We also have a-c
privilege and deliberative process slapped all over it, but 1 take
vour point.
2016-07-26
02:36:23, Tue
OUTBOX
Let's just try to slip in and see him in the morning.
2016-07-26
02:36:27, Tue
INBOX
Bottom line: it wasn't key to what we were looking at and it
certainly was waaaay below the cut line of getting this done with
the timeliness the D wanted.
2016-07-26
02:36:39, Tue
INBOX
1 have early. \U0001f612
2016-07-26
02:37:10, Tue
OUTBOX
Well 1 won't be there before anyway.
2016-07-26
02:46:45, Tue
OUTBOX
Your boy Bernie better not f this up.;)
INBOX
Just sent you background on
2016-07-26
03:23:02, Tue
INBOX
Jesus Christ how can he talk that long?l?l??l
2016-07-26
03:26:36, Tue
OUTBOX
Okay, 1 stopped watching him like 20 minutes ago. 1 just don't care.
\n\nThis however, was terribly charming. 1 \u2764 her.\n\nFirst
Lady Michelle Obama Carpool Karaoke -
YouTube\nhttps://m.voutube.com/watch?v=ln3wAdRAim4
2016-07-26
03:54:19, Tue
OUTBOX
Well that's a relief! :)\n\nJust watched your video (think 1 had seen
it) and a couple others.
2016-07-26
11:48:26, Tue
INBOX
Just was talking with him...want to talk with you about strategies of
what Bill wants to do with Brief.
2016-07-26
15:31:31, Tue
INBOX
Hey do you want an low side or high side? And how do
you want to tell Baker the answer to his juestion?
29
DOJ-PROD-OOOOI95
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-07-26
15:33:39, Tue
OUTBOX
Oh yeah, forgot we wanted to do that.
2016-07-26
15:57:47, Tue
OUTBOX
Still in here
2016-07-26
16:06:40, Tue
OUTBOX
Headed to my ofc now
2016-07-26
16:09:27, Tue
OUTBOX
Bring your wallet. Jim wants to meet at 430 instead.
2016-07-26
18:08:34, Tue
OUTBOX
Stay there. Only have 20 minutes before 1 need to see andy again
2016-07-26
18:11:39, Tue
INBOX
Mainly trying to one Starbucks run...want something later post-
Andy mtg and pre-4:30 with Baker?
■I
We can try. 1 need to finish this letter today though. And 1 need to
get out right after wrap.
2016-07-26
23:54:42, Tue
INBOX
And hey. Congrats on a woman nominated for President in a major
party !\n\nAbout damn time! Many many more returns of the day!
\U0001f60a
2016-07-26
23:56:57, Tue
OUTBOX
\U0D01f60a That's cute. Thanks. \U0001f636
2016-07-26
23:58:20, Tue
INBOX
1 had to when Bernie just now moved for her
nomination. \U0001f636\U0001f636\U0001f636
2016-07-26
23:58:48, Tue
OUTBOX
I'm not watching. What happened?
2016-07-27
00:02:08, Wed
INBOX
They went thru roll call, she got enough votes about an hour ago.
Vermont went last, they cast their votes. Then introduced Bernie,
who called for some procedural things then moved for HRC to
become the Democratic Nominee.
2016-07-27 INBOX Chills, just because I'ma homer for American democracy that way.
00:02:41, Wed _ \U0001f63 6 \UOQ01f636\U0001 f636\U00 01f636 _
2016-07-27 INBOX If they played patriotic music or did something with the flag and an
00:03:06, Wed honor guard, I probably would have teared up.
2016-07-27
00:05:18, Wed
INBOX
Turn on pbs!
2016-07-27
00:07:14, Wed
INBOX
Oh God, Holder! Turn it off turn it off turn it off!!!!
OUTBOX
Sigh. Thank you. \U0001f636
2016-07-27
00:11:47, Wed
OUTBOX
Yeah, 1 saw him yesterday and booed at the tv. \U0001f60a
2016-07-27
00:15:56, Wed
INBOX
And asked, since she's married to a man, there’s no First
Lady. What is there?
2016-07-27
00:16:57, Wed
INBOX
(who's gonna be an utter charismatic hound dog, btw...)
2016-07-27
00:21:39, Wed
OUTBOX
Yeah, it is pretty cool. She just has to win now. I'm not going to lie, 1
got a flash of nervousness yesterday about trump. The
sandernistas have the potential to make a very big mistake here...
30
DOJ-PROD-OOOOI96
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-07-27
00:32:09, Wed
INBOX
I’m not worried about them. I'm worried about the anarchist
Assanges who will take fed information and disclose it to disrupt.
V
2016-07-27
00:37:35, Wed
INBOX
Did you watch the D's happy birthday fbi message?
2016-07-27
00:47:48, Wed
OUTBOX
1 didn't yet -1 worked my tail off today. 1 heard he made a Clinton
reference though, no?
2016-07-27
00:50:29, Wed
INBOX
He did. Any referenced - again - that it wasn't just his decision, that
it was the teams'
2016-07-27
00:52:32, Wed
INBOX
More than a reference. Two points: terrorism Miami St Bernadino
everywhere we're vigilant; second, HRC. Right decision. You may
disagree but don't you dare think or say it was biased.
2016-07-27
00:53:11, Wed
INBOX
Thinking of having lunch with Randy and seeking his support at the
board. What do you think?
2016-07-27
00:55:12, Wed
INBOX
If he's calling on MY credibility, my character, my career, my
integrity, to defend his decision, that's gotta be worth something,
right?
2016-07-27
00:58:50, Wed
OUTBOX
I think it can't hurt. He's been reaching out, right?
2016-07-27
00:59:31, Wed
OUTBOX
I would probably just wait to see if he asks what your next steps
are. I wouldn't bring it up if he doesn't
2016-07-27
01:16:08, Wed
INBOX
Just saw nyt feed. Jon said D's first Q at brief was about the
case/two emails?
2016-07-27
01:44:45, Wed
OUTBOX
Maybe not the first but it came up very soon thereafter.
2016-07-27
01:45:08, Wed
OUTBOX
Yeah, 1 saw it too. so it wasn't us.
2016-07-27
01:51:37, Wed
INBOX
1 want to hear about it. funny, he doesn't always share about
stuff like that (and didn't much in this case). \n\nGuess I could ask
him.
2016-07-27
02:10:19, Wed
OUTBOX
Dammit, 1 just turned on the convention. I'm tired I But Bill is going
to suck me in!
2016-07-27
02:10:52, Wed
INBOX
Of course he is.
2016-07-27
02:11:55, Wed
INBOX
Oh God, he’s OLD \U0001f62f\U0001f622
2016-07-27
02:11:58, Wed
OUTBOX
And hey guess what, big surprise. is a big R Arkansas
Clinton-hater.
2016-07-27
02:12:28, Wed
OUTBOX
And so skinny!
2016-07-27
INBOX
02:13:22, Wed
2016-07-27
02:13:23, Wed
INBOX
Yeah. Really old. And missing words. But still charming.
2016-07-27
02:14:28, Wed
OUTBOX
He's not using a teleprompter. He should
■ 31
DOJ-PROD-OOOOI97
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-07-27
02:14:58, Wed
INBOX You sure?
2016-07-27
02:15:21, Wed
INBOX Oh gosh his fingers Re trembling
2016-07-27
02:16:56, Wed
OUTBOX
1 know. 1 saw that too.
2016-07-27
02:17:58, Wed
OUTBOX
Yeah, maybe he is using one
2016-07-27
02:18:10, Wed
INBOX
He's def using teleprompter
2016-07-27
02:20:40, Wed
INBOX
Will he get all 50 states before his speech is thru?
2016-07-27
02:50:07, Wed
OUTBOX
It's fine, but not like Michelle.
2016-07-27
02:50:55, Wed
INBOX
He's doing better now. He gets energy from the crowd.
2016-07-27
02:53:03, Wed
OUTBOX
Yup, he does.
2016-07-27
02:54:17, Wed
INBOX
So sad, the comment about more yesterdays than tomorrows.
\U0001f622\n\nAnd i don't.like Chelsea! Her husband even
less...\U0001f612
2016-07-27
02:57:07, Wed
OUTBOX
1 like Chelsea fine. Why not?
2016-07-27
03:00:18, Wed
INBOX
Self entitled. Feels she deserves something she hasn't earned
2016-07-27
03:02:01, Wed
OUTBOX
Why do you think that?
2016-07-27
03:02:17, Wed
OUTBOX
And crap! It's late again!
2016-07-27
09:46:32, Wed
INBOX
God I'm tired. No convention tonight for me...
2016-07-27
09:51:49, Wed
OUTBOX Though Tim Kaine will likely speak.
2016-07-27
23:58:38, Wed
INBOX
Arghh. Talked to SO frustrating.
\n\nAlso VERY different recounting from JB of call they had with
•
2016-07-28
00:12:25, Thu
OUTBOX
No it's not. STFU.
2016-07-28
00:12:58, Thu
OUTBOX
Oh god. How different? Trisha and were on the call - can't we
get confirmation from them?
2016-07-28
00:16:21, Thu
INBOX
Primary thing was no mention of perhaps doj over promised. I'll ask
tomorrow. Trisha won't tell (at least me) because it’s
secretsecretsecret. Sort of like this goddamn Jon and 1
can’t see...vet...\U0001f612
2016-07-28
00:18:53, Thu
OUTBOX
He didn't say he said that. That was just offline to us.
32
DOJ-PROD-OOOOI98
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-07-28
00:21:17, Thu
INBOX
1 understand that. description of their behavior was based
on a different interpretation 1 must have really over promised
her clients," "glad they got to see first hand how unreasonable she
is. witness the vellie. etc etc"
2016-07-28
00:22:07, Thu
OUTBOX
Oh. Yeah, 1 didn't credit that at ali.
2016-07-28
00:36:58, Thu
OUTBOX
Ha. First line made me smile. \n\nWhat Does the US Government
Know About Russia and the DNC Hack? -
Lawfare\nhttps://www.lawfareblog.com/what-does-us-
government-know-about-russia-and-dnc-hack
2016-07-28
00:42:34, Thu
INBOX
Interesting. Good comments about Comey, too\n\nTrump and the
Powers of the American Presidency, Part III -
Lawfare\nhttps://www.lawfa reblog.com/trump-and-powers-
american-presidencv-Dart-iii
2016-07-28
00:55:29, Thu
OUTBOX
Damn. Didn't realize Panetta was on already.
2016-07-28
00:59:03, Thu
OUTBOX
Stupid*ss Bernie supporters shouting no more war so that he
couldn't be heard hardly at all. I'm sorry, they're idiots.
2016-07-28
01:01:27, Thu
INBOX
They really are.
2016-07-28
01:02:21, Thu
INBOX
And he was a really important speaker for them. \U0001f621
2016-07-28
01:04:06, Thu
OUTBOX
1 know. I’m really angry.
2016-07-28
01:18:01, Thu
OUTBOX
1 really really like Joe Biden.
2016-07-28
01:24:09, Thu
INBOX
Was literally grabbing phone to say Joe's doing great!
2016-07-28
01:26:14, Thu
OUTBOX
He's just a really sincere guy.
2016-07-28
01:29:15, Thu
INBOX
Bob said he was absolutely beloved by Delaware State Police. And
funny story about him and gtwn basketball team in China a few
years ago. Too long for here.
2016-07-28
01:38:44, Thu
OUTBOX
^U0001f621\n\nTrump & Putin. Yes,
It's Really a Thing\nhttp://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/trump-
putin-yes-it-s-really-a-thing
2016-07-28
INBOX
01:51:10, Thu
2016-07-28
01:54:20, Thu
INBOX
This article highlights the thing l mentioned to you earlier, asking if
Bill had noted it to 7th floor. I'm going to send it to him
2016-07-28
02:01:15, Thu
INBOX
I'm not going to be able to hold out until Obama...
2016-07-28
10:04:56, Thu
INBOX
Hi. I'll be glad when the convention is over...I'm exhausted. Tom
Kaine's a little weird. \n\nAnd it's a gorgeous sunrise...
2016-07-28
10:34:30, Thu
OUTBOX
1 also need this convention to be over. I'm extremely tired.
33
DOJ-PROD-OOOOI99
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-07-28
11:01:14, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-07-28
11:05:13, Thu
INBOX
2016-07-28
11:07:00, Thu
OUTBOX
\
2016-07-28
11:07:18, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-07-28
11:09:34, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-07-28
11:10:22, Thu
INBOX
2016-07-28
11:11:21, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-07-28
11:11:58, Thu
OUTBOX i
2016-07-28
11:49:46, Thu
INBOX
2016-07-28
11:52:08, Thu
INBOX
2016-07-28
14:05:01, Thu
INBOX
2016-07-28
14:05:43, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-07-28
INBOX
15:34:25, Thu
2016-07-28
15:36:35, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-07-28
15:40:34, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-07-28
15:59:45, Thu
INBOX
Yeah, that's irritating. Let them overrule us, then.
Who is that
woman?
Head of the
aut to lunch with
Oh boy. Working the board.
\U0001f612
34
DOJ-PROD-0000200
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-07-28
16:00:24, Thu
INBOX
1 have better connections;)
2016-07-28
16:00:49, Thu
INBOX
Wonder how he knows him
2016-07-28
16:00:57, Thu
OUTBOX
Yeah, no clue.
2016-07-28
16:03:57, Thu
INBOX
Gotta make sure I time Randy right
2016-07-28
16:10:21, Thu
INBOX
And this is one of those instances where I'm proud of the people 1
know and don't know....
2016-07-28
16:10:54, Thu
OUTBOX
You should be.
2016-07-28
18:28:00, Thu
OUTBOX
Just finished meeting with Don't care for him. \U0001f612
2016-07-28
18:28:35, Thu
OUTBOX
No. Need to go see andy
2016-07-28
18:30:05, Thu
INBOX
And I'm not surprised. All indications are he's a d*ck. Want to hear
about it, of course.
2016-07-28
18:36:58, Thu
OUTBOX
Of course. Ttyl.
2016-07-28
22:27:39, Thu
INBOX
Just done with Bill you in office
2016-07-28
22:28:09, Thu
OUTBOX
I'm going to bills right now. Figured you were there.:(
2016-07-28
22:28:28, Thu
INBOX
He left.
2016-07-28
22:28:33, Thu
INBOX
I'll come up
2016-07-28
22:28:44, Thu
OUTBOX
For sure he's gone?
2016-07-29
10:48:22, Fri
INBOX
Watched hillary is all
2016-07-29
10:49:24, Fri
INBOX
She was ok. B+\n\nChelsea was awful. Tried to do Bills up close
sharing. Didn't come across as genuine. Plus, she has a HORRIBLE
billv goat speech tic
2016-07-29
16:31:08, Fri
OUTBOX
Yeah, 1 didn't go. Too busy. Lunching with DD. Locking this up now
2016-07-29
17:16:48, Fri
INBOX
Hey if you discussed new case with Andy would appreciate any ’
input /guidance before we talk to Bill at 3. Let me know I'm happy
to come up if that's easier.
2016-07-29
21:20:25, Fri
OUTBOX
Hey, can you ask jon to stick around?
2016-07-29
21:20:46, Fri
OUTBOX
Going to try to finalize the Ihm tonight
2016-07-29
22:17:01, Fri
INBOX ;
Oh - and Trisha mentioned to to put
for seniority until she comes back from al,
on this new case
35
DOJ-PROD-0000201
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-07-29
22:40:47, Fri
INBOX
Oh. News breaking Russians hacked Clinton email. \n\nAlso, you
talk to Eric? \n\nAnd yeah, re \U0001f612 1 told to tell
Trisha not to bother, that can cover a week.
2016-07-29
22:45:40, Fri
INBOX
Ooh just saw on CNN first campaign add showing Gowdy and
Comey's back and forth with a "should HRC face criminal charges"
survey via 800 number.
2016-07-29
22:48:34, Fri
OUTBOX
1 agree re
2016-07-29
22:49:02, Fri
OUTBOX
Yeah Kortan told us DCCC and Hillary Campaign hacked.
2016-07-29
22:50:32, Fri
OUTBOX
Spoke to eric. No real information, but she clearly wants to come
back in a year. Over my dead body. Need to talk to rybicki. Spent a
lot of talking with her.
2016-07-29
22:51:58, Fri
INBOX
WTF!!I! The new guy, then her, again? !?\n\nShe can be a special
assistant to the head of the TSC...
\ U000 lf612\ U000If 612\U000lf612
2016-07-29
INBOX
Fley also note in the email you forwarded from
22:55:55, Fri
2016-07-29
23:14:09, Fri
OUTBOX
Thanks. 1 didn't read it closely. Do you want t me to reach out to
2016-07-29
INBOX
1 don't know. What’s the ask
23:16:43, Fri
2016-07-29
OUTBOX
23:17:11, Fri
2016-07-30
00:26:38, Sat
INBOX
It will be great. Lots of light, it will be just fine. \n\nUnrelated, 1
cannot BELIEVE thinks she can get back in. Talk about cognitive
dissonance.
2016-07-30
00:26:46, Sat
INBOX
And what it Rybicki thinking? !??!
2016-07-30
00:27:28, Sat
OUTBOX
I know. Where? What on earth would she do?
2016-07-30
00:27:46,'Sat
OUTBOX
I don't think he's entertaining anything.
2016-07-30
00:29:36, Sat
INBOX
Oh there's always room somewhere, iust look a 1 and
and and and. Could replace|^^^^^^I^^HH(i\nOh. 1
thought he was the one who she had pitched. At length.
2016-07-30
00:30:00, Sat
INBOX
1 GUARANTEE Randy would take her, though he'll be gone
2016-07-30
OUTBOX
1 do think she was talking to him about it. But really, he would
00:30:52, Sat
never. If he did, he'd be an utter lying hypocrite.
2016 07-30
00:31:34, Sat
OUTBOX
1 do think it's funny that she's not trying to get back to doj. Or
maybe she is. Who knows.
2016-07-30
00:32:11, Sat
INBOX
Probably both. But doj's too smart to rehire
36
DOJ-PROD-0000202
Strzok-Paee Texts
2016-07-30
OUTBOX
00:32:33, Sat
2016-07-30
OUTBOX
11:46:12, Sat
2016-07-30
OUTBOX
Yes. That's my guess too.
Hey, do you want me to respond to
He emailed.
11:47:19, Sat
2016-07-30
11:47:45, Sat
INBOX
1 didn't get a email notification. Let me go check
2016-07-30
11:48:40, Sat
INBOX
Stupid phones.
2016-07-30
11:49:41, Sat
INBOX
I'll respond. Answer is we're telling verbally via OGC channels of
our intent to do so and following with written notice along with list
of what we're providing?
2016-07-30
11:51:08, Sat
OUTBOX
Yes, but we're not doing either until we meet with DOJ again and
have come to final agreement about what we're turning over.
2016-07-30
11:51:26, Sat
INBOX
Right
2016-07-30
12:35:37, Sat
INBOX
Just got this from Jon. Couldn't agree more:\nl've mentally moved
on to the next big thing. All this back and forth w/ DOJ on docs
seems needlessly petty and irrelevant at this point. Not to them 1
guess...
2016-07-30
12:45:59, Sat
OUTBOX
Totally right there with you. Was thinking before bed last night that
it is going to be hard to ramp up for testimony on MYE in the fall be
none of us are going to care at all anymore.
2016-07-30
12:50:52, Sat
INBOX
Do you know if Andy got concurrence back from George about the
preamble? No need to ask Andy right now, I think we can in very
good faith date the LHM July, 2016.
2016-07-30
13:07:00, Sat
OUTBOX
No, 1 haven't heard back.
2016-07-30
13:08:45, Sat
INBOX
Np problem, it can absolutely wait, it's funny, 1 didn't see how last
night's made any real difference, but of it makes DoJ happier,
great.
2016-07-30
13:25:01, Sat
INBOX
Note addition of Jon and to last email
2016-07-30
13:30:50, Sat
OUTBOX
You saw this, right? It was incredibly moving.\n\nln Tribute to Son,
Khizr Khan Offered Citizenship Lesson at Convention
http://nyti.ms/2azktsN
2016-07-30
13:32:53, Sat
OUTBOX
Oh, you should go watch it. it was quite powerful. Read the article
too.
2016-07-30
INBOX
Hi. I'm partial to any woman sending
15:32:20, Sat
articles about how hasty the Russians are.
37
DOJ-PROD-0000203
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-07-30
15:35:52, Sat
OUTBOX
hate them. 1 think they're probably the worst. Very little
1 find redeeming about this. Even in history. Couple of good writers
and artists 1 guess.
.
2016-07-30
15:41:26, Sat
INBOX
\nB) f*cking conniving cheating savages. At statecraft,
athletics, you name it. I'm glad I'm on Team USA. '
t
...\nD) talking with ;, who’s been great. Going back
through acting DCM. All good, and asked him to keep quiet,
bu+H3382t 1 think it's likely he will inform main State and they may
call over to see what's going on. Will forward you the update I'm
ahoiif fn cenrl Rill
2016-07-30
INBOX
And unrelated, re work, of course 1 thought about you going. No
18:24:56, Sat
chance Andy would want someone there for visibility?
2016-07-30
18:25:27, Sat
OUTBOX
One sec,
2016-07-30
18:25:44, Sat
OUTBOX
No chance of me going. He trusts you guys.
2016-07-30
18:26:39, Sat
INBOX
And poop. I'm glad he does,
but just saying. Poop.
2016-07-30
20:35:35, Sat
OUTBOX
The Real Plot Against America http://nyti.ms/2amhEYR
2016-07-30
21:56:01, Sat
OUTBOX
\u2018l\u2019m Resigned to Having a Terrible President\u2019
http://nyti.ms/2aoV6GV
2016-07-31
16:36:02, Sun
INBOX
doing a million administrative things, dealing with
personnel tweaks.
2016-07-31
23:10:23, Sun
INBOX
2016-07-31
23:11:35, Sun
INBOX
And damn this feels momentous. Because this matters. The other
one did, too, but that was to ensure we didn't F something up. This
matters because this MATTERS. \n\nSo super glad to be on this
voyage with you. \U0001f636
2016-07-31
23:12:06, Sun
INBOX
Roger thanks
2016-07-31
23:13:52, Sun
INBOX
Thanks for doing that...
2016-07-31
23:14:59, Sun
INBOX
Well wait a minute. Sentinel now shows Go with
this one.
2016-07-31
23:15:58, Sun
INBOX
104
2016-07-31
23:20:46, Sun
OUTBOX
So on the other text, is Moffa ind
2016-07-31
23:27:00, Sun
INBOX
Yes, but not sure which is which
38
DOJ-PROD-0000204
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-07-31
23:28:52, Sun
OUTBOX
Don't you have their numbers in your phone?
2016-07-31
23:30:01, Sun
INBOX
Sigh. Yes. But 1 need to go check...
2016-07-31
23:30:32, Sun
INBOX
Plus 1 don't want the DD's office texting my people direct. I'm a
control freak. :D
2016-07-31
23:31:03, Sun
INBOX
Other way around.
2016-07-31
23:31:11, Sun
OUTBOX
Oh please. 1 will find that out right quick. This is all about whether
you want to make it easy on yourself.
2016-07-31
23:31:17. Sun
OUTBOX
Ha. Thanks.
2016-07-31
23:39:02, Sun
OUTBOX
This makes me very
angry.\n\nDonald Trump\u2019s Confrontation With Muslim
Soldier\u2019s Parents Emerges as Unexpected Flash Point
htto://nvti.ms/2aEwvez
2016-07-31
INBOX
Yeah I'm furious about it. Interwebs are on fire.
23:41:10, Sun
2016-08-01
01:38:23, Mon
OUTBOX
1 mean seriously. What in the hell is this guy talking about?
\n\nDonald Trump Gives Questionable Explanation of Events in
Ukraine http://nvti.ms/2arMCvV
2016-08-01
01:58:10, Mon
OUTBOX
How Paul Manafort Wielded Power in Ukraine Before Advising
Donald Trump http://nvti.ms/2aFv026
2016-08-01
16:11:37, Mon
OUTBOX
1 am just waiting for my calendar to open so 1 can check Andy's
schedule and then 1 can go.
2016-08-01
20:07:55, Mon
INBOX
Did Andy mention if he talked to 1 Don't ask if he didn't, just
curious.
2016-08-01
20:11:03, Mon
OUTBOX
He didn't reach him. He said he would try again.
2016-08-01
20:38:03, Mon
OUTBOX
Ha. That’s fine. I'm walking down to andy now.
2016-08-01
21:01:13, Mon
OUTBOX
Ho boy. Don't tell moffa, but andy is cancelling their brief. And he
wants it first.
2016-08-01
21:06:27, Mon
INBOX
Worried about it?
2016-08-01
21:06:44, Mon
INBOX
1 think that's smart. Bill may need a little saving from himself....
2016-08-01
21:56:10, Mon
OUTBOX
Also, Andy spoke to was out, he has a POC for you
over there when you need it.
2016-08-01
22:07:25, Mon
OUTBOX
Brief for tomorrow is just for DD now. It's better that way, 1 think.
2016-08-02
12:04:11, Tue
OUTBOX
Hi! Good meeting?:)
39
DOJ-PROD-0000205
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-08-02
12:04:29, Tue
INBOX
2016-08-02
12:04:43, Tue
INBOX
With the \ yes, good meeting
2016-08-02
12:05:22, Tue
OUTBOX
Whoa,
2016-08-02
12:06:10, Tue
OUTBOX
Make sure you can lawfully protect what you sign. Just thinking
about congress, foia, etc.
2016-08-02
12:07:06, Tue
OUTBOX
I'm sure it's fine, 1 just don't know how protection of intel-type
stuff works in that context.
2016-08-02
12:07:21, Tue
OUTBOX
You probably know better than me.
2016-08-02
12:07:43, Tue
INBOX
Oh. You're Gering this to review. 1 TOLD you that you should have
come.;)
2016-08-02
12:19:34, Tue
INBOX
Getting, not Gering. Just sent to your fbinet email. \n\nAnd hi.
\U 0001f636\U0001f636\U 000 If 636
2016-08-02
12:20:22, Tue
OUTBOX
K. I probably won't be in until about 9. Could you send to and
trisha too?
2016-08-02
12:41:51, Tue
INBOX
\u0500\u03b3\u0201l did. \n\nBut if you were here, you could be
reading it now as we wa
2016-08-02
12:42:47, Tue
OUTBOX
1 know.:(\n\nl just called trisha to make sure she looks at it soon.
She is acting Jim so probably still in morning meetings.
2016-08-02
12:45:39, Tue
INBOX
@ + @Ooh ooh ooh. also told at their mentoring
session, "one day 1 can see you on my staff."\n\nAnd "ive cracked
the code. Come to me and I'll tell v
2016-08-02
12:48:06, Tue
INBOX
@ + @ou how to get where you want to go."\n\nWhat an
ASTOUNDING douche
2016-08-02
13:36:19, Tue
INBOX
Dude hurry up and get in. 1 worry ogc is making happy to glad
changes which are nice to have but not legally necessary and which
will derail this thing.
2016-08-02
13:37:09, Tue
OUTBOX
I'm here. Reading it now
2016-08-02
14:37:30, Tue
INBOX
Interesting fact. Guy we’re about to interview was
2016-08-02
OUTBOX
Yeah, that's helpful is calling you a bunch of d*cks right now.
16:56:19, Tue
2016-08-02
INBOX
Tell him to suck it! Enjoy your presentation about background
17:00:39, Tue
investigations!
2016-08-02
17:01:09, Tue
OUTBOX
We're all in the same place then. Ttyl.
2016-08-02
17:50:13, Tue
OUTBOX
Have moffa and lere. Stand by.
40
DOJ-PROD-0000206
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-08-02
18:36:59, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-08-02
OUTBOX
19:27:22, Tue
2016-08-02
19:55:44, Tue
INBOX
And you HAVE had to deal with and 1 thought
was out all this week
2016-08-02
21:53:59, Tue
INBOX
Hi. emailed me, so im hoping that might mean you're
done...\U0001f636
2016-08-02
22:44:57, Tue
INBOX
@ 00 @And hey. 1 just had an extraordinary flash of anger that our
long-stated desire to DoJ to get us comments by Thursday in order
to have a meeting on Frida
2016-08-02
22:45:01, Tue
INBOX
@ 00 @y was trumped by anc being absent. You
know what? I'm absent now. I'll be back on Wed. So, DoJ, stick to
the original time frame we’ve had
2016-08-02
22:45:02, Tue
INBOX
@ 00 @so Pete can be present. 1 guess and being
there is SO much more important. Crank crank crank. \n\nAre we
still having a meeting on Fri?
2016-08-02
23:03:21, Tue
INBOX
@ 8 @ And just heard from Jon. Thanks so so much for having the
discipline to wait another 24 hours to have the first meeting about
the case with DoJ. 1 reall
2016-08-02
23:25:44, Tue
INBOX
@8 @y appreciate it.
2016-08-02
23:30:47, Tue
OUTBOX
Jesus. There's a lot to read here. Let me call check in with andy,
and 1 will call you.
2016-08-03
00:57:16, Wed
INBOX
@ P @Yeah well I'm going to go write some recollections from the
interviews this afternoon. The fact that I'm thinking of things that I
iust mentioned right n
2016-08-03
00:57:17, Wed
INBOX
@ p (Sow that 1 didn't immediately remember makes me think 1
need to get them jotted down.
2016-08-03
00:57:50. Wed
INBOX
Ooh. Remind me about the seif and the embassy history.
2016-08-03
00:58:10, Wed
INBOX
And 1 want to tell you now. \U0001f636
2016-08-03
00:58:33, Wed
INBOX
The first part needs to be on another system, though. Or in person.
2016-08-03
INBOX
Oooh. And remind me
01:07:28, Wed
\U0001f628
2016-08-03
01:08:44, Wed
OUTBOX
Think so. Not sure. For sure his RNC experience is going to be a
zero, don't know enough to tell more.
2016-08-03
01:09:26, Wed
INBOX
A zero in terms of not the same characters?
2016-08-03
01:10:12, Wed
INBOX
Also, Ihm preamble is fine, i cannot believe how long it took
\U0001f612
2016-08-03
01:10:25, Wed
OUTBOX
Just don't think it's going to be useful. Think interactions are going
to be more with his security folks. (Be he has private, ex-Bu ones in
addition to the Service).
DOJ-PROD-0000207
Strzok-Page Texts
01:17:03, Wed
2016-08-03
01:17:05, Wed
2016-08-03
01:40:24, Wed
2016-08-03
01:40:34, Wed
2016-08-03
01:43:20, Wed
2016-08-03
01:47:56, Wed
2016-08-03
01:47:57, Wed I
2016-08-03
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
@ p talked about the Embassy. It's the longest continuously
staffed establishment in London (he noted the Austrian was the
o ldest, but they were thrown o u_
@p @t during the War (s))
201G-08-03
01:50:27, Wed
INBOX
Random fact? (I'm looking at the dip list to get a name) Armenian
Ambassador to London? Armen Sarkissian. Wife Nouneh.
2016-08-03
02:14:50, Wed
OUTBOX
FYI, just checked yellow, and there are POCs for you from both
OGAs waiting there for you. Both may have already reached out.
Safe travels home.
2016-08-03
07:33:34, Wed
OUTBOX
New case. Information flow. Control.
2016-08-03
07:34:14, Wed
OUTBOX
Andy. The dynamic. \n\nAnd yeah, but it's not mine to worry
about.
2016-08-03
07:35:59, Wed
INBOX
@ (1 @Right there with you. Already told
2016-08-03
07:36:03, Wed
INBOX
\n\nl plan on telling Bill I'm
obviously going to tell him anything he wants to know, but
recommend we not tell him or highe
2016-08-03
07:36:05, Wed
INBOX
@ (1 @r specific data so that he and higher can tell DOJ, even we
don't know the admin details.
2016-08-03
07:36:24, Wed
INBOX
You're Andy’s counsel. By definition it's yours to worry about.
42
DOJ-PROD-0000208
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-08-03
07:37:02, Wed
OUTBOX
No it's not. Not like this. He's clearly not.
2016-08-03
07:38:31, Wed
INBOX
\u0500\u0318\uQ302this is MUCH more tasty for one of those
aholes to leak. For th
2016-08-03
07:38:35, Wed
INBOX
\u0500\u0318\u0303e first time in a while I'm not worried about
our side. \U0001f612
2016-08-03
07:39:29, Wed
INBOX
He's clearly not what? Worrying about
BESS SI
OUTBOX
Information flow and control.
2016-08-03
07:40:58, Wed
INBOX
He should be. 1 can reinforce that when 1 brief you/Bill, and Andy, if
1 talk to him about it.
2016-08-03
17:51:41, Wed
OUTBOX
Sheesh, I'm glad you're back. I'm really busy. I'm about to send an
email. We NEED to focus on getting mye out the door, and quickly.
We're not going to be able to withstand the pressure soon.
2016-08-03
17:54:00, Wed
INBOX
Yep we do, and 1 haven't experienced the last two days on it. I'll call
(you know there's no way 1 could wait, though will be in the cab),
let me know what 1 need to push. \n\nAnd hi \U0001f60a
2016-08-03
18:54:45, Wed
INBOX
I like you dealing with Laufman. \u263a\n\nAnd we may beat 410.
Rahmatullah Rahimi drives like the wind in his Prius...
2016-08-03
19:08:48, Wed
OUTBOX
What's the plan for briefing Bill? Have you reached out to him?
2016-08-03
19:09:15, Wed
INBOX
Not yet \U0001f636
2016-08-03
19:09:49, Wed
OUTBOX
Oh, be that's on purpose?
2016-08-03
19:10:07, Wed
INBOX
Wanted to get in first. Ideally want to do when you and Moffa are
around. Should 1 send an email to the three of you re availability
2016-08-03
19:10:28, Wed
OUTBOX
Have you called George? I'm telling you, you should do that before
you get in here.
2016-08-03
19:10:32, Wed
INBOX
No. Just hadn't thought it through yet. Will send an email. At 14th
and Penn.
2016-08-03
19:10:41, Wed
OUTBOX
Oh! \U0001f636
2016-08-03
19:11:07, Wed
INBOX
1 havent, but 1 don't want to talk in front of our cab driver. I'll call
him from cell from my office.
2016-08-03
19:15:18, Wed
OUTBOX
Or mine. \U0001f636
2016-08-03.
21:38:55, Wed
INBOX
Hi. Our 4:00 meeting was Not Helpful. \U0001f60a\U0001f636
2016-08-03 OUTBOX in my ofc. Will let you know when he is gone.
22:10:20, Wed __
2016-08-04 INBOX I did ok briefing Bill yesterday... :D
12:37:43, Thu_
43
DOJ-PROD-0000209
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-08-04
23:59:34, Thu
INBOX ■
Yep. \n\nTrying to be grownup and not ask to come tomorrow
based on mye, overlap. Jon's brief, he's got it. 1 just love,
and am good, at thinking thru it.
2016-08-05
00:01:38, Fri
INBOX
Yep but willing to bet all those things will come up. Along with ci
briefs to candidates.
2016-08-05
00:01:50, Fri
INBOX
We need to figure out what's going on with that
2016-08-05
00:02:14, Fri
OUTBOX
We need jon to enter in his guys to the system.
2016-08-05
00:02:27, Fri
OUTBOX
Oh, we haven't talked about that solution yet, have we?
2016-08-05
00:02:39, Fri
OUTBOX
It's pretty elegant.
2016-08-05
00:03:00, Fri
OUTBOX
Don't really want to tell you here. Will tell you tomorrow.
2016-08-05
00:03:51, Fri
INBOX
Oh, they brought it up - to check when it gets entered
2016-08-05
00:04:09, Fri
INBOX
Without having g to ask/rely on others
2016-08-05
00:04:20, Fri
INBOX
mentioned it
2016-08-05
00:10:42, Fri
INBOX
Seriously, you don't think I should try and go to the AM meeting?
How does it not involve extensive discussions about the
lag
OUTBOX
Pete. It's not a meeting. It's pulling up jon for 5 minutes to discuss
lanes in the road.
2016-08-05
00:11:35, Fri
INBOX
Think of the threshold you use when deciding whether you go to a
meeting.. .\n\nOk \U0001f636
2016-08-05
00:12:06, Fri
INBOX
Gonna take more than 5 minutes. Or, give Andy the questions
/issues for an answer later.
2016-08-05
00:12:57, Fri
OUTBOX
It's quick and informal. And this is not going to be the last
opportunity to talk about this. Especially il
there will be lots of time to discuss.
2016-08-05
00:16:24, Fri
INBOX
1 get it. I'm not talking about options so much as the difficult
questions are ones that I'm directly involved with. \n\nBut OK. 1
will. If you were in my spot, wouldn't you want to go? For examole
1 have no desire to be at the joint run through with Cyber.
2016-08-05
00:17:35, Fri
OUTBOX
And how many meeting are you at that Jon has an equal
right and contribution to make that’he is not at?
2016-08-05
00:18:27, Fri
INBOX
Those times 1 can invite him, 1 do.
2016-08-05
00:18:57, Fri
INBOX
And 1, for example, the agency said today their group is too big to
come to us. So we either go to them, and Jon is out, or reschedule
till next week. What should 1 do?
2016-08-05 I INBOX Re your question, I can think of two with Andy.
00:19:33, Fri ___
44
DOJ-PROD-0000210
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-08-05
00:20:00, Fri
2016-08-05
00:20:33, Fri
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
Reschedule.
Pete, I'm not going to fight with you about this. You asked for my
opinion, I gave it to you. _
2016-08-05
00:21:59, Fri
INBOX
And push till next week? We willing to bear the "FBI is delaying"
line?
2016-08-05
00:22: 57, Fri
2016-08-05
00:27:23, Fri
2016-08-05
00:27:50, Fri
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
The work right now is all analytical. Does Monday make a
difference? Will the othe r analysts go?_
My concern is the perceived delay of not doing it this week. A day
clearly doesn't matter, though we pushed till the end of this week
at my request due to not being available at the beginning of the
week._
And it's not just analysis. And, shockingly, agents are also capable
of analysis as well... _
2016-08-05
00:29:18, Fri
OUTBOX
Okay, I'm done having this conversation with you.
2016-08-05
00 : 29 : 32 , Fri
2016-08-05
00:32:40, Fri
2016-08-05
00:33:00, Fri
2016-08-05
00:33:43, Fri
2016-08-05
00:34:24, Fri
OUTBOX
iINBOX
lOUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
2016-08-05
00:34:30, Fri
2016-08-05
00:37:31, Fri
2016-08-05
00:38:19, Fri
OUTBOX
INBOX
2016-08-05
00:38:59, Fri
2016-08-05
00:39:04, Fri
2016-08-05
00:39:28, Fri
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
I asked if the other analysts would be going.
That's up to Jon. I just told him I was calling and telling her he
needs to be there and to reschedule to Monday unless he doesn't
want to do that.
Are you going by yourself or planning to take others?
No, I told lim, me, just our leadership. Her group is
apparently too big to fit into a car. \U0001f612__
If Jon says keep it, I will take and defer to Jon if he wants me to
take one of his guys. \n\nBut when we spoke earlier, he wanted
me to p ostpone it _
Yes Peter. That is my point. She has a whole team, all you need is
yours elf._
No, damnit, that's not it. I don't want to wait longer.
What I don't like about their behavior is knowing we were only
bringing leadership, they can't bring three to us?
But instead they'll fill the room to take notes on everything we say
and also ensure that no one on their side says anything sensitivr
Sensitive.
And why I told Jon I was going to push the meetig
2016-08-05
00:39:35, Fri
INBOX
Meeting
2016-08-05
OUTBOX
So ask them to skinny down and come to you. It’s your meeting,
00:40:12, Fri
and we're leading this effort.
2016-08-05
00:45:18, Fri
INBOX
Yep, that's what I plan to do. And if the can't, we'll reschedule.
45
DOJ-PROD-0000211
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-08-05
| INBOX
And so you know, I value your advice. Letting the meeting
00:53:29, Fri
tomorrow go, and rescheduling the one tomorrow so Jon can be
there, and also not play into agency’s bsgame
2016-08-05
11:29:44, Fri
OUTBOX
INBOX
stuff, noth ing else is that pressing. _
That's not true. There's the meeting with my team, the meeting at
the agency (looks like Jon can go, not sure where the notion of a
schedule conflict came from), mye, everything else in my Section,
acting DAD.\n
2016-08-05
14:09:05, Fri
2016-08-05
14:50:44, Fri
2016-08-05
14:52:47, Fri
INBOX
:OUTBOX
INBOX
Have M w f meetings with at 9 like we did with mye.
\n\nNee d to tall to you about Bill ___
too, right?
Not sure. Probably, right? Defer to
2016-08-05
14:53:45, Fri
OUTBOX
I'm just going to invite him. Though it’s a big group now (10).
Added baker.
2016-08-05
14:59:40, Fri
INBOX
4 ogc attorneys...
2016-08-05
14:59:54, Fri
INBOX
2016-08-05
15:00:09, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-08-05
15:00:18, Fri
OUTBOX
Agreed. Okay, whatever.
2016-08-05
16:37:25, Fri
INBOX
And hi. Went well, best we could have expected. Other than
quote, "the White House is running this."
2016-08-05
16:37:46, Fri
INBOX
My answer, "well, maybe for you they are." \U0001f612
2016-08-05
16:44:35, Fri
INBOX
And of course, 1 was planning on telling this guy, thanks for coming,
we've got an hour, but with Bill there, I've got no control.
\n\nWhat time do vou need to leave?
2016-08-05
16:54:55, Fri
OUTBOX
Don't you have work to do?
2016-08-05
16:55:26, Fri
OUTBOX
Yeah, whatever (re the WH comment). We've got emails that say
otherwise.
2016-08-05
20:45:10, Fri
INBOX
Gotta see Bill. Ttyl.
2016-08-05
22:05:41, Fri
OUTBOX
Jesus, are you STILL talking to Bill? \U0001f612
2016-08-05
22:10:10, Fri
INBOX
He is FREAKING out
2016-08-05
22:34:13, Fri
OUTBOX
Think I'm going in on Sunday. 2-3 hours. I just NEED to read that
LHM or I'm not going to be able to.
2016-08-05
22:41:05, Fri
INBOX
Of course if you do, I'll try, too \U0001f636
46
DOJ-PROD-0000212
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-08-05
22:41:36, Fri
INBOX
I can also email it to you if you want me to encouraging ERASing...
2016-08-05
22:41:49, Fri
INBOX
Encourage
2016-08-05
22:49:18, Fri
OUTBOX
No, 1 have it on eras. 1 can't read critically that way. .
2016-08-06
10:40:39, Sat
INBOX
I'm not sure. 1 had a lot of late back and forth with on the
Told her had done them but it was last night. Think
it's that but I'm not certain. I'll ask him.
2016-08-06
10:40:46, Sat
INBOX
Just emailed him and Jon
2016-08-06
11:28:43, Sat
INBOX
And Jon and 1 are about to go ballistic, between email (if
you're frustrated at 12:09 and you haven't tried to call me at some
point before then, part of this is on you) AND THE ABSOLUTE
INABILITY GO SEND ANY EMAIL.\U0001f621
2016-08-06
11:35:06, Sat
OUTBOX
Yeah, the email seemed a little unnecessarily harsh. I mean, it's not
like we all haven't been working on it all damn day.
2016-08-06
11:44:39, Sat
INBOX
And 1 can't send a f*cking email in response....
2016-08-06
11:45:17, Sat
INBOX
Just pulled out eras, talking to 1500...
2016-08-06
11:46:19, Sat
OUTBOX
Hmm. I'm going to send you a low side email, see if it is just you.
2016-08-06
11:46:53, Sat
INBOX
Thanks. Jon can't either. I can receive just fine
2016-08-06
11:47:08, Sat
OUTBOX
Sending failed.
2016-08-06
11:47:47, Sat
OUTBOX
1 do wonder if it was a quasi-drunk email...
2016-08-06
11:47:57, Sat
INBOX
Yup. Think it's a system - wide thing. Call 1500 and make them put
in a ticket. Could we suck more?
2016-08-06
11:49:28, Sat
INBOX
Might have been. And we’re fine. Still
2016-08-06
13:52:00, Sat
INBOX
Did you read the one pager sent to Andy,the
What on earth? \U0001f615
2016-08-06
13:56:03, Sat
OUTBOX
Yes. Incomprehensible. 1 was utterly shocked that he is as
impressed by him as he is.
2016-08-06
13:56:40, Sat
OUTBOX
1 had no idea what those lists are supposed to mean. No wonder
Andy didn't remember reading it. \U0001f612
2016-08-06
13:56:50, Sat
INBOX
I'm speechless. Did Andy say anything? 1 mean, it's bad. It's going to
hurt reputation.
2016-08-06
13:57:08, Sat
OUTBOX
No, 1 haven't talked to him about it yet.
2016-08-06
13:57:24, Sat
INBOX
God just avoid it and hope it goes away.
2016-08-06
13:57:34, Sat
OUTBOX
But you'll recall, said he gave it to Andy before. Andy probably
glanced at it and threw it out.
47
DOJ-PROD-0000213
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-08-06
13:57:45, Sat
INBOX
I've got to figure out a way to broach with
.
2016-08-06
13:58:29, Sat
INBOX
Oh. 1 thought this was the first time. This is what Eric wrote? It
didn't say that in the email.
2016-08-06
13:59:56, Sat
INBOX
And 1 don't know if 1 can mention to 1... look, as a friend. I’d
be cautious about what you send to the DD...he's got limited
bandwidth and I’d be really selective? \n\n\nl mean, 1 don't
know...it’s really bad. 1 had to force myself to read all of it carefully.
2016-08-06
14:15:12, Sat
INBOX
1 wasn't there when 1 said he had given it to Andy before
2016-08-06
14:24:55, Sat
OUTBOX
No, on this, you can't say anything. Moffa and 1 were discussing.
The most you can say is "I'm not sure 1 found that as compelling as
you did" or something to that effect.
2016-08-06
14:27:02, Sat
OUTBOX
Emails appear to be going through now.
2016-08-06
14:30:45, Sat
INBOX
Yeah 1 don't know. I've got a different relationship with him than
Jon does but 1 don't know if 1 can do much on this.
2016-08-06
14:31:43, Sat
OUTBOX
1 just don't think this one is the right one to bring up with him.
2016-08-06
14:33:29, Sat
INBOX
That's fair. 1 just hate not mentioning it because it plays to/
highlights some of weaknesses (some true, some perceived).
And it’s absolutely the wrong time to bring it up.
2016-08-06
14:34:27, Sat
OUTBOX
We've all talked to him a lot about it. He's now got to figure it out
for himself.
2016-08-06
14:36:39, Sat
INBOX
Yeah but working for him that calculation is different. And certainly
much more so in the event 1 get the DAD job.
2016-08-06
14:37:01, Sat
OUTBOX
Yeah, maybe.
2016-08-06
14:37:08, Sat
INBOX
And that's weighing on me much more than 1 want to admit to you
(or probably myself).
2016-08-06
14:37:33, Sat
INBOX
Getting/not getting the job, not advising Bill
2016-08-06
14:38:09, Sat
OUTBOX
Jesus. You should read this. And Trump should go f himself.
\n\nMoment in Convention Glare Shakes Up Khans\u2019
American Life http://nyti.ms/2aHuLE0
2016-08-06
14:41:33, Sat
INBOX
1 know. And as it stands,I'm going to have (and already do) a pretty
tough time with it. \n\n5 months, Lisa. Out of 19 years. 5 months,
because Giacalone was too busy interviewing to be there to SES
board it earlier. There was literally NO difference in what 1 was
doing dav to dav.
2016-08-06
14:42:34, Sat
OUTBOX
1 know, 1 know. It's senseless and not fair, but you can't
control it.
2016-08-06
14:53:36, Sat
INBOX
God that's a great article.
\UOOOlf621\U000lf6le\U000If6le\u2764\n\nThanks for sharing.
\n\nAnd F Trump.
48
DOJ-PROD-0000214
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-08-06
14:55:00, Sat
OUTBOX
And maybe you're meant to stay where you are because you're
meant to protect the country from that menace. To that end, read
this:
2016-08-06
14:55:19, Sat
1 OUTBOX
Trump\u2019s Enablers Will Finally Have to Take a Stand
http://nyti.ms/2aFakrv
2016-08-06
15:04:43, Sat
'INBOX
Thanks. It's absolutely true that we're both very fortunate.
\n\nAnd of course I'll try and approach it that way. 1 just know it
will be tough at times.\n\nl can protect our country at many levels,
not sure if that helos...
2016-08-06
15:05:51, Sat
OUTBOX
1 know it will too. But it's just a job. It's not a reflection of your
worth or quality or smarts.
2016-08-06
15:28:50, Sat
INBOX
1 really like this:\nHe appears to have no ability to experience
reverence, which is the foundation for any capacity to admire or
serve anything bigger than self, to want to learn about anything
beyond self, to want to know and deeply honor the people around
vou.
2016-08-06
15:30:59, Sat
OUTBOX
Sigh. That's the paragraph, upon reading, that caused me to want
to send it to you. \U0001f636
2016-08-06 OUTBOX Okay, so maybe not the best national security president, but a
17:24:11, Sat genuinely good and decent human being.\n\nPresident Barack
lObama on Feminism, Michelle, and His Daughters |
'Glamour\n http://www.glamour.com/story/glamour-exclusive-
president-barack-obama-says-this-is-what-a-feminist-looks-like
2016-08-06
17:34:25, Sat
INBOX
Yeah, 1 like him. Just not a fan of the vyeakness globally. Was
thinking about what the administration will be willing to do re
Russia. As 1 tried to focus Bill.
2016-08-07
12:58:44, Sun
OUTBOX
Carl. Jon Moffa.
2016-08-07
12:59:16, Sun
OUTBOX
You trust these people. You've just never tried to trust them with
anything other than work.
2016-08-08
00:10:09, Mon
INBOX
Well, I'll be here if you want to bounce questions tonight, and will
be in early tomorrow...either way...
2016-08-08
00:13:02, Mon
INBOX
Truly, will make you this offer - will input your changes as you finish
reading what you haven't done yet. Plus, it's all the cyber
stuff...your eyes will glaze over.
2016-08-08
00:15:30, Mon
INBOX
But if you want me to kick you in the butt to motivate you to go in,
let me know. You can be done with it by 9:30 or so...leave it and 1
can start inputting changes when 1 get in tomorrow morning.
2016-08-08
12:31:32, Mon
INBOX
Hey head Andy called Jason
2016-08-08
12:34:36, Mon
OUTBOX
Oh he did? So does he start today?
2016-08-08
13:05:09, Mon
INBOX
Sounds like it - Jason was looking for me...talkto you in 30 or so
2016-08-08
13:10:47, Mon
OUTBOX
K. Spoke to about LHM FOIA timing. Remind me.
49
DOJ-PROD-0000215
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-08-08
13:47:03, Mon
INBOX
K. Done. Stop by in a few?
2016-08-08
14:18:12, Mon
INBOX .
K heading up
2016-08-08
15:14:52, Mon
INBOX
Hey no update yet, waiting on Moffa, he’s in with Dina at mtg
scheduled to end at ll...\U0001f612
2016-08-08
15:28:43, Mon
INBOX
Hey talked to him, will let him fill you in. Internal joint cyber cd
Intel piece for D, scenesetter for arief,
directed ail the cyber info be pulled. Doesn't make sense, at all. I'd
think let Bill and Jim hammer out first, though it would be best for
D to have it before the Wed WH session.
2016-08-08
15:28:50, Mon
INBOX
But doesn't need you to step out
2016-08-08
15:51:33, Mon
OUTBOX
Hey 1 didn't understand the above. I just tried your desk and cell.
2016-08-08
15:53:52, Mon
INBOX
Sorry missed the first ring. Eating with Jason.
2016-08-08
17:13:07, Mon
INBOX
Heading up
OUTBOX
Okay, but 1 need to talk to in a little bit. Strategizing about you,
actually.
2016-08-09
03:26:25, Tue
OUTBOX
He’s not ever going to become president, right? Right?!
2016-08-09
10:08:45, Tue
INBOX
What prompted the Trump.comment last night?
2016-08-09
10:09:28, Tue
OUTBOX
Just reading the times.
2016-08-09
14:31:04, Tue
INBOX
Funny. is here. Has a 1030 with Steinbach. \U0001f612
2016-08-09
14:31:15, Tue
INBOX
Both of them are still in meetings.
2016-08-09
15:54:35, Tue
OUTBOX
Ho boy.
2016-08-09
16:20:31, Tue
INBOX
Just finished Bill wants another 5
2016-08-09
16:21:50, Tue
OUTBOX
Im.coming down to talk to Bill.
2016-08-09
17:00:17, Tue
OUTBOX
He said he spoke to mike, and that Mike said he supports you, so
maybe you don't need to say anything. Just email randy.
2016-08-09
17:01:22, Tue
OUTBOX
Yeah, yeah. Add it to the list.;)
50
DOJ-PROD-0000216
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-08-09
20:42:46, Tue
INBOX
2016-08-09 INBOX
21:56:09, Tue_
2016-08-10 INBOX
00:08:38, Wed _
INBOX
KuCSjKSW
TrSuvaMP
2016-08-10
00:57:58, Wed
2016-08-10
10:10:52, Wed
2016-08-10
10:36:38, Wed
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
Hey 1 ran into Bill, he wants to keep the brief smaller. His point
(which I hadn't thought of) is Andy is more likely to share his
internal thinking in front of a smaller group of people he knows
rather than a larger group. Plus, fysa/atmospherics, Bill noted "it's
just so hard to get time with him." Whether true or not that's Bills
perception. Thought you'd want to know
OMG did you hear what Trump just said?
Just sent you report with changes accepted
And hey, do i need to tell Randy the board is Thurs?
I'd shoot him an email.
What Intelligence Briefings Can Tell Us About Candidates
nyti.ms/2aUCaQB _
Hey I did not mention to Jon Andy's preference for more detail.
Would you send an email to him. Bill and I saying same, e.g., don't
care who, but need to be able to deep dive?\n\nThen Jon and I can
meet with Bill and decide. \n\nUnless you want to handle
diffe
2016-08-10
10:45:38, Wed
OUTBOX
That's fine.
2016-08-10
10:49:21, Wed
OUTBOX
You can imsg again if you had more to say.
2016-08-10
11:35:59, Wed
INBOX
About to drive. Talk in a sec - work?
2016-08-10
11:53:51, Wed
OUTBOX
Going to go sit in on the morning brief. Carl said it's s good one and
1 shouldn't miss it. Ttyl.
2016-08-10
15:34:14, Wed
OUTBOX
Been talking to for like an hour. Was a really good talk.
Can I stop by? TON to tell you
2016-08-10
23:52:58. Wed
2016-08-11
00:13:09, Thu
2016-08-11
00:33:54, Thu
2016-08-11
00:33:58, Thu
:OUTBOX
'OUTBOX
Hey call me re D brief. Moffa and I had the immediate same
reaction
In fairness, from the email i's not clear what wf is proposing to do
And hey, I read that wfo email again and it's just a press inquiry
and confusion/suggestion might be linked to it...not
consi deration of opening a case. _
Got it. Yeah, the press inquiry was brief at wrap. Didn't mention to
ddm ___
Dd.
51
DOJ-PROD-0000217
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-08-11
00:34:30, Thu
INBOX
Oh, and funny. Ran intc AGAIN this afternoon going to the
briefing. He peeled off to Mikes. Not sure if he had to reschedule
from yesterday. .
2016-08-11
00:34:39, Thu
INBOX
He looked sheepish....
2016-08-11
00:35:19, Thu
OUTBOX
Well, he can't rely on quality...
2016-08-11
00:46:22, Thu
INBOX
went crazy stalky on me to figure out if there was
anything to the inquiry. She IS persistent.
2016-08-11
INBOX
So. You come up with a codename?
00:48:15, Thu
2016-08-11
00:51:26, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-08-11
00:53:00, Thu
INBOX
Ooh. 1 like it \n\nWant me to send to
2016-08-11
00:53:39, Thu
OUTBOX
If you want.
2016-08-11
00:53:46, Thu
INBOX
Why (other than it sounds badass, and you came up with
it \U0001f636)
2016-08-11
00:54:24, Thu
OUTBOX
Trying to think of something without being
obvious.
2016-08-11
00:56:56, Thu
INBOX
2016-08-11
00:57:27, Thu
INBOX
OMG 1 CANNOT BELIEVE WE ARE SERIOUSLY LOOKING AT THESE
ALLEGATIONS AND THE PERVASIVE CONNECTIONS
2016-08-11
00:57:41, Thu
INBOX
What the hell has happened to our country!?!?!??
2016-08-11
11:13:28, Thu
INBOX
Is Baker around today? 1 need 5 minutes with him. You can cone
ifnyou want. 1 want to talk to him about the Cl brief, specifically the
hhHIihh
2016-08-11
INBOX
That might also be something appropriate to ask NSD. Thoughts?
11:14:30, Thu
2016-08-11
11:16:21, Thu
OUTBOX
I'll think about it. 1 bet baker can handle.
2016-08-11
11:18:15, Thu
INBOX
Thanks. \n\nWill read shortly, hustling to get out the door.
2016-08-11
16:06:05, Thu
OUTBOX
Andy had a wry smile when i saw me waiting for him. Of course 1
have no idea what that means.
2016-08-11
16:18:22, Thu
INBOX
We decided to take to lunch instead. \U0001f61c
2016-08-1.1
16:18:42, Thu
INBOX
Still have room for you....
2016-08-11
16:18:47, Thu
OUTBOX
Jerkies.
2016-08-11
16:19:10, Thu
OUTBOX
I'm still waiting for Andy to come out of his meeting so 1 can get the
news!
2016-08-11
16:19:27, Thu
OUTBOX ,
Can 1 call Jon to buy you a drink if 1 get it? \U0001f60a
52
DOJ-PROD-0000218
Strzok-Page Texts
mu
INBOX
Ha. Yes.
2016-08-11
16:21:44, Thu
INBOX
Lost Moffa somewhere. Added
2016-08-11
16:22:16, Thu
OUTBOX
How could you lose Moffa? He's like 6 feet tall?
2016-08-11
16:23:23, Thu
INBOX
He disappeared
2016-08-11
16:56:50, Thu
OUTBOX
Congratulations, You're the new DAD of the
Counterintelligence Division.
_1
2016-08-11
16:56:56, Thu
OUTBOX
Don't tell...
2016-08-11
16:58:36, Thu
INBOX
1 pm then follow on with Bill. DoJ
at 4 then Baker 430.
2016-08-11
16:59:14, Thu
OUTBOX
Obviously, don't tell Bill. I'll call you when I'm back.
2016-08-11
20:30:43, Thu
OUTBOX
Can you and come up and see me when you are done?
2016-08-11
20:31:06, Thu
OUTBOX
Is with you? Can you please come up here?
2016-08-11
20:31:49, Thu
INBOX
A) whew. 1 did \U0001f636\nB) walking to see JB. She is still in
4017
2016-08-11
20:36:48, Thu
INBOX
We’re in Jims SCIF
2016-08-11
22:58:37, Thu
OUTBOX
On with rybicki.
2016-08-11
23:20:02, Thu
INBOX
Hey just swung by your office on the way out...you close by?
Otherwise will head out
2016-08-11
23:20:14, Thu
OUTBOX
I'm in kortan
2016-08-11
23:21:07, Thu
OUTBOX
Coming with herring, you need to leave.
2016-08-11
23:21:36, Thu
INBOX
Going towards affice
2016-08-11
23:21:47, Thu
INBOX
Sorry, to nslb
2016-08-11
23:21:55, Thu
INBOX
1 hear you
2016-08-12
11:46:09, Fri
OUTBOX
Do you get a car as DAD? What time will you have to be there?
2016-08-12
12:00:49, Fri
INBOX
1 do get a car. 1 don't know if I'm authorized to take it home.
Obviously will check on that. 745 first meeting, so 730...
2016-08-12
12:01:39, Fri
INBOX
Hey Jon and 1 talked round and round on these briefs, whether to
leave him and me or give to Do you think Andy would have a
preference? Do vou?
53
DOJ-PROD-0000219
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-08-12
12:01:50, Fri
OUTBOX
I think give to
2016-08-12
12:01:58, Fri
INBOX
Need to get a final answer to this morning.
2016-08-12
12:02:05, Fri
OUTBOX
1 think it protects you guys better.
2016-08-12
12:02:11, Fri
INBOX
Would Andy object?
2016-08-12
12:04:08, Fri
OUTBOX
To No, I can't imagine he would.
2016-08-12
12:04:51, Fri
INBOX
Bill sent an email asking to see me at 9 or 11....have a mtg
at 9, so 11 it is
2016-08-12
13:09:38, Fri
INBOX
Hi. Bill pulled me aside to say he was told the board went the way
he,wanted, but still needs the D’s blessing
2016-08-12
13:10:03, Fri
OUTBOX
Yay. \U0001f60a
2016-08-12
14:57:58, Fri
INBOX
And that's SUPER aggravating about flipping \U0001f621
2016-08-12
15:00:24, Fri
OUTBOX
Yeah whatever.
2016-08-12
15:01:05, Fri
OUTBOX
Hey you N EED to pull that 302 before you leave for the day.
2016-08-12
15:31:22, Fri
INBOX
Come down. To my office for lunch I'll pull it now
2016-08-12
INBOX
And I'm going to blow your mind
15:31:39. Fri
2016-08-12
15:57:39, Fri
INBOX
Let me know when you're done, we can eat
2016-08-12
15:58:03, Fri
INBOX
And/or discuss 302s, as needed
2016-08-12
16:40:29, Fri
INBOX
Hey 1 have a 130 with Bill and would like to eat before then. Should
1 wait for you? Maybe go at 1 if 1 haven't heard from you?
2016-08-12
16:47:12, Fri
| OUTBOX
1 don't have to grab anything be now 1 need to write up an email to
the d explaining all of this.
2016-08-12
19:29:01, Fri
INBOX
You around? 1 NEED to talk to you before 1 go
2016-08-13
00:38:33, Sat
INBOX
Just talked to . Indications Guccifer 2.0 claiming massive hack of
Congress, or at least Dems. All on line now.\n\nS:gh, Well he's
going to feel super defensive, because as you pointed out, he was
there all week. You going to stew until you talk? If so, might as well
get it out...
2016-08-13
00:52:43, Sat
INBOX
Cells and private emails for House Dems
2016-08-13
01:03:03, Sat
OUTBOX
God, did you read some of the comments on that article?!
2016-08-13
01:32:54, Sat
INBOX
And the comments in the Smoking Gun article? Can't get them to
load....
54
DOJ-PROD-0000220
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-08-13
11:04:47, Sat
INBOX
Im going to have do his Cl brief presentation for me and Jon
and on Mon afternoon. I want to do another one Tues Am for
at least Bill. You think add you, Jim Baker? 1 want both rank and
thoughtfulness for feedback. Plus repetitions for him.
2016-08-13
11:21:21, Sat
OUTBOX
Yes. I'll be there.
2016-08-13
13:02:03, Sat
INBOX
Hey read the email 1 just sent. 1 did not include OPA or oca on the
distro
2016-08-13
13:11:55, Sat .
OUTBOX
There's no debate. I'm going to forward to kortan. God, makes me
want to tell state to go f it.
2016-08-13
13:14:29, Sat
INBOX
Yep! You think we should have commented, if only to rebut States
"expectation of interagency coordination" crap?
2016-08-13
INBOX
And
13:22:29, Sat
yeah. States BS just makes me want to include those additional
302s. But that's just vindictiveness talking.
2016-08-14
01:13:27, Sun
OUTBOX
But see, this article so rings true that then 1 think the
nside the Failing Mission to Save Donald Trump From
Himself http://nvti.ms/2b5WSNA
2016-08-14
10:35:59, Sun
OUTBOX
This was very interesting. \n\nThe Decline of Unions and the Rise
of Trump http://nyti.ms/2bc7alU
2016-08-14
10:41:11, Sun
OUTBOX
God this makes me so angry.\n\nDona!d Trump Is Making America
Meaner http://nyti.ms/2b6gG38
1
INBOX
I’m not! \U0001f636\n\nl saw but didn't read the first article.
2016-08-14
10:58:46, Sun
OUTBOX
Just about their force in moderating the political debate. It was
interesting.
2016-08-14
11:00:46, Sun
INBOX
And 1 am worried about what Trump is encouraging in our
behavior. The things that made me proud about our tolerance for
dissent - what makes us different from Sunnis and Shias losing
each other up - is disappearing.
2016-08-14
11:01:23, Sun
OUTBOX
That's what that last article is all about.
2016-08-14
11:01:54, Sun
INBOX.
I'm worried about what happens if HRC is elected. \n\nAnd
perfect, another excessive h^at warning day.
2016-08-14
20:06:22, Sun
OUTBOX
Just spoke to She and and Jim in some mandatory
leadership training tomorrow
2016-08-14
20:07:55, Sun
INBOX
Np. We'll get done whatever needs doing. Primarily QC,
nor
2016-08-14
20:17:55, Sun
OUTBOX
No, all the work of pulling out first.
2016-08-14
INBOX
Well, Jon and I can do that, \n\nl didn't see the
20:18:56, Sun
Hill
INBOX
Anything other than scrub 302s for agency equities?
2016-08-14
20:25:53, Sun
OUTBOX
1 don’t think scrub. Just remove the ones that are their employees.
DOJ-PROD-0000221
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-08-14 INBOX
20:27:02, Sun
2016-08-14 OUTBOX |In 302s, you mean? I just think no. But we can discuss.
20:36:27, Sun__
2016-08-14
21:20:01, Sun
INBOX
Hey. So Rybicki just emailed me about briefing D on tomorrow
at 330. If not then, Wed. I said we could do either. Dont know
Andy's availability / desire to svtc in. Assume you can, right?
2016-08-14
21:23:09, Sun
OUTBOX
Andy not going to. Either is fine for me.
2016-08-14
21:25:25, Sun
INBOX
Jim proposing D dd add ead GC Trisha you him bill me jon
2016-08-14
21:27:55, Sun
OUTBOX
Fine, 1 suppose. Don't love add obviously, but so be it.
2016-08-14
22:56:30, Sun
INBOX
And uh, yeah, 1 then forgot to actually ADD him to the distro.\n\n
So 1 just forwarded to him. Good work, Pete, \U0001f612
2016-08-14
23:34:36, Sun
INBOX
So it's a little weird to me that Jason, a subordinate a week ago,
will be the one discussing with Toscas amd OLA as well as with
Steinbach and everyone else at the 8... fine, 1 guess, but weird...
2016-08-15
10:29:55, Mon
INBOX
I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in
Andy's office - that there's no way he gets elected - but I'm afraid
we can't take that risk. It's like an insurance policy in the unlikely
event vou die before you're 40...
2016-08-15
10:41:11, Mon
OUTBOX
1 really should take off the whole damn day. \U0001f621
2016-08-15
10:48:42, Mon
INBOX
So go ahead! We'll get the production done.\n\nl'd obviously love
to have you at the D brief, but if not, I'll stop by and give you an in-
person debrief.
2016-08-15
10:51:45, Mon
OUTBOX
Oh, crap, has that been scheduled?
2016-08-15
11:15:01, Mon
INBOX
Not that I've seen. JR said he'd get with this morning
2016-08-15
11:17:03, Mon
OUTBOX
Are you still acting DAD?
2016-08-15
11:17:28, Mon
INBOX
No. Why?
2016-08-15
11:18:05, Mon
INBOX
1 ask because that will change whenever board is official
INBOX
OMG this production alone is going to kill my inbox....
2016-08-15
21:16:52, Mon
INBOX
Going to talk to Call me here when you're done...\U0001f60a
2016-08-15
21:48:55, Mon
OUTBOX
Herring here.
56
DOJ-PROD-0000222
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-08-15
21:51:03, Mon
INBOX
K. Want me to hold off?
2016-08-15
21:54:47, Mon
OUTBOX
You can come, just have something you are here to talk about.
2016-08-15
INBOX
Hey 1 want to talk about feedback from brief and other stuff.
22:01:27, Mon
2016-08-15
22:05:22, Mon
INBOX
Or, 1 can walk up and find out you left. \U0001f6l2\n\nGive me a
shout when you get back.
2016-08-16
00:43:35, Tue
OUTBOX
Changing topics a little, but I'm really excited about all the "whoa
that was quick" congratulatory emails...
2016-08-16
00:45:07, Tue
INBOX
Sigh. Yeah, 1 know. 1 need to hit the right tone. Probably just,
thanks very much, tremendous opportunity, I'm looking forward to
it.
2016-08-16
10:05:29, Tue
INBOX
Nice email from Bowdich last night \U0001f60a
2016-08-16
11:21:20, Tue
INBOX
When's your WH thing on Thurs? You going to be too busy with
prep?
2016-08-16
11:21:58, Tue
OUTBOX
No. No prep really.
2016-08-16
11:23:45, Tue
INBOX
Ooh. Ok, so 1 think any work. Probably Wed so I don't have to
worry about the 1:00 cd mtg
2016-08-16
11:33:46, Tue
OUTBOX
So your first meeting is at 745 with whom. Bill?
2016-08-16
11:35:06, Tue
INBOX
730 with my Special Assistant. Who im.not convinced I need
2016-08-16
11:35:45, Tue
INBOX
And based on my Boston contacts, 1 told not to select.
\U0001f612
2016-08-16
11:36:01, Tue
OUTBOX
1 also don’t think you need one, but give it a month before you
decide.
2016-08-16
22:40:19, Tue
INBOX
I'm strongly opposed to making any more copies for Congress. We
limited on purpose. After careful consideration. If they let any
particular committee get the copy, tough. Let them sort it out.
2016-08-16
23:08:20, Tue
INBOX
Can you talk briefiy?\n\nWhat time do these need to be done?
How many copies? Stop worrying / making calls about who should
do it. 1 will have 4-5 of my people come in early. Is complete by 10
OK?
2016-08-16
23:14:17, Tue !
OUTBOX
is doing it now, is headed back in. I'm going to join
shortly.
2016-08-17
03:01:26, Wed
INBOX
Hey was or Trisha on update from Jim? Don't want Bill
blindsided in the morning
2016-08-17
03:06:37, Wed
OUTBOX
Trisha and
2016-08-17
03:07:23, Wed
INBOX
I'll ask
57
DOJ-PROD-0000223
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-08-17
10:28:37, Wed
OUTBOX
An article to share: Trump shakes up campaign, demotes top
adviser\nTrump shakes up campaign, demotes top
adviser\nhttp://wapo.st/2bzAUGD
2016-08-17
10:29:25, Wed
INBOX
Just reading it
2016-08-17
10:33:38, Wed
INBOX
Re last email and text last night, I'm going to stop asking. 1 want to
be in the loop, also want Bill in the loop, but that's not my job. \nA)
makes me feel like a whiny b*tch\nB)
'.) need to talk to about making sure her clients are in
the loop. Thats part of her job, not yours
2016-08-17
10:35:51, Wed
OUTBOX
Sigh.\n\nThe story behind the \u2018American Dream\u2019
photo at West Point that went vira 1 - The Washington
Post\nhttps://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/20
16/05/25/the-story-behind-the-american-dream-photo-at-west-
point-that-went-
v/iral/?fiH=hvhriri pynprirnpntranrlnmrhpnknnint 1 na
2016-08-17
OUTBOX
10:38:29, Wed
You can ask, that doesn't bother me.
2016-08-17
10:47:25, Wed
INBOX
Thats fair.\n\nl think somt times it's not directed {or not meant to
be directed) at you, it's expressing frustration. 1 want to vent and
you’re the only place (because of both friendship and shared
knowledge of the email) that 1 can. \n\nl'm aware you probably
hear me in even those times and either don't need me to tell you
what I'm telling you, feel like I'm asking you do do something about
it, or both. \n\nAnd sometimes. I'm just looking for a little
validation. Yes, the Andy - George dynamic did cause some
problems. Yes, Jim in particular isn't always good at email distro.
Thats all.\n\nAnyway, all of this probably better talked about it
person, or not at all.\n\nl‘m tired of it, and 1 hate myself during it
(and 1 then remember you saying, well, at least you’re seeing it in
yourself. So change)
2016-08-17
10:51:14, Wed
INBOX
Thank you for the article \U0001f636
2016-08-17
10:51:33, Wed
OUTBOX
Pete.
2016-08-17
10:51:59, Wed
INBOX
Yeah 1 may be overthinking
2016-08-17
10:53:52, Wed
OUTBOX
1 hear you above, but 1 think 1 know the difference between when
you are just "venting" or wanting to be validated, and when you're
just being unreasonable and taking your sh*t out on me.
58
DOJ-PROD-0000224
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-08-17
10:56:57, Wed
INBOX
1 agree. Yesterday was the latter, asking
for the email last night was the former. And as you noted, probably
ordinarily ok to gripe about it, but not last night.
2016-08-17
10:57:50, Wed
INBOX
And 1 don't mean to cut you off if you have more to say on the
topic.
2016-08-17
11:02:31, Wed
INBOX
Re the email, resisted the urge to tell him, well, Randys briefing it
may be an insider threat, he's getting that from somewhere. Will
sort it out today. Thanks for the heads up.\n\nAlso got 1
think to get Moffa an invite for all the IPC stuff going on with
election threat. Talked with Moffa at length about it beforehand.
Right now fbi being represented entirely by Cyber. asked
CD1, and they punted to C3S. I'm certain didn't
realize the broader implications.
2016-08-17
11:03:13, Wed
INBOX
The sigh to you getting it, not some stupid IPC process. 1
2016-08-17
11:10:37, Wed
OUTBOX
Totally. Moffa the right guy. Let me know if you need help. Easy fix
by and 1.
2016-08-17
11:23:38, Wed
INBOX
No, 1 think it's fixed. As normal, we're our own worst enemy
2016-08-17
13:46:19, Wed
INBOX
Just met with oca team. All set. (No jinxes)
2016-08-17
20:46:41, Wed
OUTBOX
Hey, headed down to B2 now
2016-08-17
20:47:27, Wed
INBOX
K see you there
2016-08-17
20:47:28, Wed
OUTBOX
No, I'm not. Kortan just stopped me in the hall.
2016-08-17
20:49:27, Wed
OUTBOX
Ok leaving now
2016-08-18
INBOX
1 have svtc with Brits at
10:46:05, Thu
9, 302 party at 10, you have lunch with either your friend or me
and at 1130, 1 have my 1 cd exec mtg, you have
WH....suppose we could go at the end of the day, 1 can take
2016-08-18
19:45:21, Thu
INBOX
What time is deadline for state TPs to Jim?
2016-08-18
23:46:10, Thu
INBOX
Can you eras? Just clear email. That will be enough
2016-08-18
23:49:36, Thu
OUTBOX
1 do wonder if they are waiting to get briefs for the email handling
classified information mess to die down before they get the
briefings.
2016-08-18
23:52:05, Thu
INBOX
1 can't see that. They're either worried about or don't really
need them.
2016-08-19
00:53:28, Fri
OUTBOX
Ukraine Releases More Details on Payments for Trump Aide
http://nyti.ms/2breAOV
59
DOJ-PROD-0000225
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-08-19
10:26:19, Fri
INBOX
2016-08-19
10:54:02, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-08-19
11:04:50, Fri
INBOX
2016-08-19
11:06:23, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-08-19
17:59:16, Fri
INBOX
2016-08-19
18:00:09, Fri
INBOX
2016-08-19
18:08:38, Fri
INBOX
2016-08-19
20:50:08, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-08-19
20:53:05, Fri
INBOX
2016-08-19
20:58:52, Fri
INBOX
2016-08-19
20:59:39, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-08-19
21:22:36, Fri
INBOX
2016-08-19
21:22:45, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-08-19
22:54:33, Fri
INBOX
2016-08-19
23:12:31, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-08-19
23:14:28, Fri
INBOX
2016-08-20
01:13:46, Sat
INBOX
Just sent you i think a good way for
to proceed.
Should I forward leak article to baker and rybicki?The Powell stuff
was in her 302 an d Ihm, rig ht? Did we turn over his 302? _
Sure, but note that odd sourcing. It was in her 302; I'd want to
double check if we turned over his 302, though I'm almost certain
we did.\n\nAnd I'd bet the unnamed source is almost certainly
Powell. _
I'm just going to forward your email, so the sourcing ref is in there.
Sorry 1 have 20 minutes to get my shit together for dni
Shouldn't take that log. Let me pull data, should take 10 minutes
Good side effect of briefing this a million times.
Might skip prep, we'll see. How'd it go?
Ooh god I love that answer :)\n\nReally well. He's calling D, I left
me ssage for Rybicki. Will call you when I get back... _
Ok, I REALLY love that answer \U0001f636
Why calling D? To say you guys are awesome? Get your thoughts?
Just got to hq
Where’s this coming from?\n\nFirst on CNN: Feds investigate
Manafort firm as part of Ukraine probe -
CNNPolitics.com\nhttp://www.cnn.com/2016/08/19/politics/paul-
manafort-donald-trump-ukraine/index.html
Yeah, don’t know. Heard or saw something about it yesterday too.
At wrap Tues or Wed I think.
Oh weii.
And thanks for forwarding the other email. I'm disappointed that
Jon and I don't have the opportunity to input, where
ind Jason do, but I'm letting go and not worrying about
it or letting it bother me. Bill has not forwarded, but I think he may
assume that since 80 people are on the distro, we got it.\n\nl'm
angriestfor because of what and didw/r/ther
and going direct with Jim.
60
DOJ-PROD-OOOCI226
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-08-20
11:20:05, Sat
INBOX
And a favor, please - to the extent there are follow on relevant
Kendall/MYE emails (and there may not be), please forward if
appropriate. Bill has told Jon and me that he isn't typically reading
them, and is relying on us to flag any issue he needs to weigh in on.
Given the large distro of Jim's emails, I'm willing to bet he doesn't
notice we're not on there. 1 will discuss with him next week as well.
Thanks .
2016-08-20
INBOX
Ion
11:47:50, Sat
and Bill and 1 had a group rant about these.'
2016-08-21
20:38:37, Sun
OUTBOX
Dude, 1 bcc'ed. But oh well.
1
2016-08-21 !
20:39:10, Sun
INBOX
That's why 1 went to you and
2016-08-22
16:57:10, Mon
OUTBOX
Meeting is at 1:15 now.
2016-08-22
17:04:49, Mon
OUTBOX
Going to go talk to low.
2016-08-22
OUTBOX
17:04:56, Mon
2016-08-22
18:04:36, Mon
INBOX
1 prefer )
2016-08-23
01:03:57, Tue
OUTBOX
reading the IG report. It's really dry...
2016-08-23
01:04:53, Tue
INBOX
Eep. Yeah, that's pretty terrible. Put that trash down.;)
mi
OUTBOX
1 can't. This week is going to be terrible. 1 need to get crap done
where 1 can...
2016-08-23
23:37:59, Tue
INBOX
Hey I'm not going to that training tomorrow, 1 will hit a later
2016-08-24
21:54:32, Wed
OUTBOX
Good thing you skipped the implicit bias training, it was apparently
AWFUL. So bad, folks are likely to go back to the DAG to object to
it.
2016-08-24
22:28:45, Wed
INBOX
Hi. Still going with Bill. Stepped out to tell you....\U0001f636
2016-08-24
OUTBOX
22:29:31, Wed
A re
23:36:46, Wed
we in thunderdome tonorrow? Have audio/video for briefing. Can
get in there 15 min early with AV guy? Coordinate thru
2016-08-24
23:37:38, Wed
OUTBOX
Ooh. A/V time.
61
DOJ-PROD-0000227
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-08-24
23:38:56, Wed ;
OUTBOX
We can be wherever you want. Thunder dome is fine. Early is fine.
He should be able to log on to his fbi net terminal and do whatever
he needs. I'll send an email to low letting her know we will
need a/V.
2016-08-24
23:38:57, Wed
INBOX
No. Not worth it.\n\nYep! Everyone loves a video, even if the subj
is wildly uncooperative. Great tech work, shows competence and
urgency. Plus is kind of a douche.
2016-08-24
23:39:37, Wed
INBOX
Thank you\n\nWe can do video in his office but figure that would
be weird/awkward....
2016-08-24
23:40:09, Wed i
INBOX
Am 1 still buying you and unch tomorrow?
\U0001f60a\U0001f60a\U0001f60a
2016-08-24 1
23:40:34, Wed
OUTBOX
Will probably depend on his schedule. It's his only day in the office.
2016-08-25
14:08:20, Thu
OUTBOX
I'm here. Also, let's meet at my ofc at 1130 for lunch. is still
good.
2016-08-25
14:39:47, Thu
INBOX
No to , have been talking to Legat Canberra
2016-08-25
19:30:56, Thu
INBOX
What do you have after brief? ^000^636
2016-08-25
19:33:14, Thu
OUTBOX
Oh crap. I'm sorry. Been in back to back mtgs. Have a mtg with
kerry sleeper now.
2016-08-26
02:13:49, Fri
INBOX
It's ok. It's nothing compared to your night. \n\nAnd Gowdy is
really starting to p*ss me off. I'm going to need to stop reading the
news.
2016-08-26
15:29:45, Fri
OUTBOX
302 and Ihm going to be further delayed. 1 love my job.
2016-08-26
15:34:48, Fri
INBOX
Sweet Jesus. OGA?
2016-08-26
16:25:27, Fri
OUTBOX
And just had an hour long conversation with re nsls. It's
reallv never going to end...
2016-08-26
16:41:51, Fri
INBOX
What?Trnasparency crap?
2016-08-26
16:42:07, Fri
i INBOX
Good lord. Talk about an unexpected and unpleasant blast from
the past....
2016-08-26
16:42:40, Fri
INBOX
Just went to a southern Virginia Walmart. 1 could SMELL the Trump
support....
2016-08-26
16:54:18, Fri
OUTBOX
Yup. Out to lunch with We both hate everyone and
everything.
2016-08-26
17:02:52, Fri
INBOX
I want to be there and hate with you, or charm you back to happy
\n\nLooked for the two trump yard signs 1 saw on the way out to
take a picture, but couldn't see them
2016-08-26 OUTBOX Going to another meeting. Glad you're having a good time.
18:43:35, Fri _ _
2016-08-26
20:49:14, Fri
OUTBOX
Actually, Jon Moffa just made me chuckle. First time all day. 1 like
that kid.
2016-08-26
20:50:09, Fri
INBOX
What'd he say?
62
DOJ-PROD-0000228
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-08-26
20:51:12, Fri
OUTBOX
Just riffing on the hot mess that is our country.
2016-08-26
20:52:28, Fri
INBOX
Yeah....it's scary real down here
2016-08-27
20:07:01, Sat
OUTBOX
Have to go into work tomorrow afternoon. Have a which has
changed in scope that I need to write prep for. \U0001f612
2016-08-27
20:18:46, Sat
INBOX
God that sucks. Are you only backup?
2016-08-27
20:19:39, Sat
INBOX
1 know we've discussed before, but he's got to start developing
subordinates. \U0001f61e
2016-08-27
20:2 0:50, Sat
2016-08-27
20:36:07, Sat
2016-08-27
21:27:42, Sat
2016-08-27
21:34:54, Sat
2016-08-27
21: 35:37, Sat
2016-08-28
00:07:09, Sun
2016-08-28
13:23:37, Sun
2016-08-28
13:35:33, Sun
2016-08-28
13:39:49, Sun
2016-08-28
14:32:10, Sun
2016-08-28
14:43:16, Sun
2016-08-29
11:15:55, Mon
2016-08-29
11:19:12, Mon
2016-08-29
11:20:17 , Mon
2016-08-29
11:23:18, Mon
2016-08-29
11:24:00, Mon
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
UNBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
! OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
would normally be his true backup, but she's out until Tuesday
or Wednesd ay._
Well that stinks. You've been working plenty hard...\U 0001 f 615
Yeah well.
How much different is it (the scope)?
And \U0001f621. not so good at updating. Sent something I
already did, just much later. CYD clearly leading this (which is fine),
but don’t send half the info - an hour late - the AD already has from
CYD. _
I'll send separately to Andy, though I'm sure Bill will brief it at a
morning meeting. \U0001f612\n\nA Powerful Russian Weapon:
The Spread of False Stories http://nyti.ms/2bR9n3c _
It was just an nyt article to you and jon about Russia.
Thanks a lot. This will definitely come up tomorrow morning too...
Thanks. Hopefully without printed handouts.;) There was another
one about the
I AM DONE WITH MYE!!!!\U0001f621\U0001f621
Yup. And you're only getting about 70% of it compared to the rest
of us.
Np. s in (not sure why I'm doing this then, but whatever). Just
let me know when you are co min g back up. _
\U0001f621 re being in...your weekend and morning could
have been nicer. ..almost to Peets
Yeah, but she offered to put the binder together so I'll take that.
I_
\u263a good. I like her, I think. Is she still officially Steinbach's staff,
or ONP, or DO generally?
(Steinbach's staff. And yes, she's excellent.
63
DOJ-PROD-0000229
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-08-29
11:27:02, Mon
INBOX
Entering turnstiles now. Your office?
2016-08-29
22:28:55, Mon
OUTBOX
Dude you there?
2016-08-29
INBOX
In answer to your question, was in wrap.
22:46:56, Mon
2016-08-29 INBOX
22:47:12, Mon
2016-08-29 OUTBOX Fun!
22:47:41, Mon _
2016-08-29 OUTBOX I need to call Jason first
22:56:06, Mon
2016-08-30
08:25:31, Tue
INBOX
Struggling with he role of the new job. 1 get what you were saying
about "don't be^^|" where everything has to go through me,
but 1 don't know if that's entirely right. 1 better know what's going
on in my branch. 1 better know more about what's going on under
me than my AD, and surely more than the EAD or you or Andy or
the D.\n\nl get find people who can do a good job and let them do
it. Completely agree. It's figuring out the right amount to be
involved to track and guide, provide input.
2016-08-30
08:55:17, Tue
OUTBOX
\n\nAnd let's talk about the DAD thing later. All I'm saying is worry
and be present for the things that matter, not the things that don't.
2016-08-30
08:59:57, Tue
OUTBOX
My point is, that brief went super well. So even if you would have
phrased a fee things differently, and even of you would have liked
to have known every fact before hand, it was superbly. And you
not knowing was very much a function of your not being here on
Friday. So all I'm saying is focus on the things that matter.
2016-08-30
09:02:32, Tue
INBOX
1 guess. Still not entirely comfortable with it. Will figure that out,
there's an element of Jon in there that 1 also need to clarify what
I'm feeling, what's reasonable, what's not. \n\nThanks for being
there to hear all my doubt and concern
2016-08-30
09:03:18, Tue
OUTBOX
Last thing: 1 get knowing more than the guy above you, but Mike
knew far far less than even Andy and 1 knew about it. Hell, he didn't
even know we were having the brief. And I completely under how
frustrated that must have made him, but ultimately, the brief was
no worse off. Again, it's the focus on the things that matter.
2016-08-30
09:03:19, Tue
INBOX
Let me ask you this. How many times had you heard that brief,
between prep for that and and otherwise?
2016-08-30
09:03:39, Tue
OUTBOX
and then on Friday.
2016-08-30
OUTBOX
_1
09:04:18, Tue
64
DOJ-PROD-0000230
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-08-30
09:05:07, Tue
INBOX
2016-08-30
09:06:23, Tue
INBOX
2016-08-30 | INBOX
09:2D:30, Tue
__I_
2016-08-30 .. INBOX
09:44:50, Tue
2016-08-30 ; INBOX
09:45:20, Tue
No, you heard the prebrief for to Andy, then the one to the D.
Then you heard the prebrief on Fri to Andy, then this one. You've
heard it at least FOUR times.
Here we go:\nHarry Reid Cites Evidence of Russian Tampering in
U.S. Vote, and Seeks F.B.I.
Inquiry\n\nhttp://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/08/30/us/politics/har
rv-reid-russia-tampering-election-fbi.html
But Mr. Reid argued that the connections between some of Donald
J. Trump\u2019s former and current advisers and the Russian
leadership should, by itself, prompt an investigation. He referred
indirectly in his letter to a speech given in Russia by one Trump
adviser, Carter Page, a consultant and investor in the energy giant
Gazprom, who criticized American sanctions policy toward
Russia.\n\n\u201cTrump and his people keep saying the election is
ngged,\u201d Mr. Reid said. \u201cWhy is he saying that? Because
people are telling him the election can be messed with.\u201d Mr.
Trump\u2019s advisers say they are concerned that unnamed
elites could rig the election for his opponent, Hillary Clinton.
OUTBOX
D said at am brief thst Reid called him and told him he would be
e_
-
sending a le tter.
2016-08-30
09:46:29, Tue
INBOX
Bill didn't mention it\U0001f612
2016-08-30
09:51:55, Tue
INBOX
And holy cow, let me send you the Reid letter!
2016-08-30
11:10:10, Tue
OUTBOX
Have a meeting with turgal about getting iPhone in a day or so
2016-08-30
11:13:56, Tue
INBOX
Oh hot damn. I'm happy to pilot that. ...\n\nWe get around our
security/ monitoring issues?
65
DOJ-PROD-0000231
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-08-30
11:28:50, Tue
OUTBOX
No, he's proposing that we just stop following them. Apparently
the requirement to capture texts came from omb, but we're the
only org (I'm told) who is following that rule. His point is, if no one
else is doing it whv should we.
2016-08-30
11:29:25, Tue
OUTBOX
Helps that Dd had a terrible time with his phone which
made him concerned for our folks all over the place.
2016-08-30
11:29:54, Tue
OUTBOX
These phones suck as much as they do because of the program we
use to capture texts, full stop.
2016-08-30
11:34:03, Tue
INBOX
No doubt.
2016-08-30
11:34:34, Tue
INBOX
I'm not convinced, short of OPR, that text capture capability really
deters anything.
2016-08-30
11:34:58, Tue
INBOX
If 1 want to copy/take classified, I'm sure as hell not going to do it
on this phone.
2016-08-30
11:36:40, Tue
OUTBOX
1 thought it was more from a discovery perspective.
2016-08-30
11:39:49, Tue
INBOX
Probably. 5o just make a rule no texts of a discoverable nature.
\n\nl_ike you said, what are CBP, DEA, others doing?
2016-08-30
11:57:27, Tue
OUTBOX
I'm told - though 1 have seen - that there is an IG report that says
everyone is failing. But no one has changed anything, so why not
iust join in the failure.
2016-08-30
11:58:42, Tue
INBOX
Well, if our mission is degraded, that's the reason to do it. Plus,
these phones suck
2016-08-30
12:55:38, Tue
OUTBOX
Call my please?
2016-08-30
16:17:38, Tue
OUTBOX
Call desk?
2016-08-30
16:29:43, Tue
INBOX
You got the card?
2016-08-30
16:30:03, Tue
OUTBOX
Yes. In the binder already.
2016-08-30
16:30:53, Tue
INBOX
Wow. You're good.:)
2016-08-31
00:33:49, Wed
OUTBOX
VOM-IT. VOMIT. Vomit vomit vomit.\n\nEdward Snowden\u2019s
Long, Strange Journey to Hollywood http://nyti.ms/2c4Kz50
2016-08-31
00:34:55, Wed
INBOX
1 told him 1 thought it might be harder for me than for him, but that
that was ok. \U0001f636\n\nl will not read about Snowden
tonight.
2016-08-31
01:03:16, Wed
OUTBOX
And seriously, don't read the article, but jesus, V-O-M-l-T.
2016-08-31
01:06:15, Wed
INBOX
Believe me, I'm not touching that article. Maybe CYD can take that
case, too...
2016-08-31
02:37:11, Wed
OUTBOX
9
Did you ever look at this? It's incredibly powerful. And really, really
depressing. \n\nAt Least 110 Republican Leaders Won\u2019t Vote
for Donald Trump. Here\u2019s When They Reached Their
Breaking Point. http://nvti.ms/2bTNAbb
t
66
DOJ-PROD-OOOCI232
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-08-31 OUTBOX Re the case, Jim Baker honks you should have it. But I'm sure andy
11:37:05, Wed _ would defer to bill. I won't mention. _
2016-08-31 INBOX
11:39:54, Wed
2016-09-01
01:19:30, Thu
INBOX
And yeah, that article is pretty much guaranteed to get a response
out of me in my current state...\U0001f636
2016-09-01
01:19:54, Thu
INBOX
How Russia Often Benefits When Julian Assange Reveals the
West\u2019s Secrets http://nyti.ms/2clqTlf
2016-09-01
01:24:07, Thu
INBOX
Had a long talk with Bill. Can we work talk tomorrow morning re
same?
2016-09-01
01:27:45, Thu
INBOX
Bottom line Mike read Bill the riot act, said Andy yelled at him and
DJ that "the teams aren't sharing info" and told them to fix it.
5ounds like Mike and Randy want to get everyone together and yell
at us, daily updates, and other silliness.\n\nl will relay much more
detail when we talk.
2016-09-01
01:40:45, Thu
OUTBOX
Ho boy. Andy said nothing to me except it went well. Makes me
nervous that people think 1 was involved or at the meeting.
2016-09-01
01:43:27,’Thu
INBOX
Bill wanted to know what generated it. Did he (Andy) get spun up
with you?
2016-09-01
01:44:04, Thu
INBOX
Let's def talk tomorrow AM. Bill will likely seek you out to talk.
2016-09-01
01:44:41, Thu
INBOX
I’ll give you more detail hete, or better on imsg, but far easier to
relay with conversation.
2016-09-01
01:44:56, Thu
INBOX
Here. Not hete. Hete sounds like gibberish.
2016-09-01
01:47:50, Thu
OUTBOX
Let's talk tomorrow
2016-09-01
01:53:31, Thu
INBOX
K. ~
2016-09-01
09:36:11, Thu
OUTBOX
'
Going to ask Eric who he told about my mtg with Andy. If not him,
then it is running her mouth again.
2016-09-01
11:41:10, Thu
INBOX
Tried reaching out to Bill but didn't comnect
2016-09-01
11:42:11, Thu
OUTBOX
I sent an email to he and Randy asking to talk after morning
meeting. No answer, but presumably will see them in a couple.
2016-09-01
12:02:45, Thu
INBOX
Good luck. Id just tell them what you told me. You're doing a good
job, Lisa, \n\nl had more to say about what 1 think drives the
perception. Mainly people want to identify external causes of
problems rather than face that it might be them.
67
DOJ-PROD-OOOCI233
Strzok-Paee Texts
2016-09-01
12:07:39, Thu
INBOX
That means a lot of times it isn’t YOU, it's the position. 1 heard'
grumbling about such things as soon as i was in a professional
position to hear it, about and and and
everyone in between.\n\nThis is no doubt a sh*tty drawback of
vour iob.
2016-09-01
13:15:33, Thu
OUTBOX
Just did it. Mike S. didn't and hasn't said a word to me. Bill
defended me, DJ said he understood Andy's frustration, Randy said
nothing.
2016-09-01
13:17:32, Thu
INBOX
Good. Proud of Bill.
2016-09-01
13:17:53, Thu '
INBOX
How are you feeling about it?
2016-09-01
13:18:14, Thu
OUTBOX
•
2016-09-01
13:18:34, Thu
INBOX
1 sent an email to Bill saying we had talked and you were going to
call him.
2016-09-01
13:19:44, Thu
OUTBOX
1 just pulled them all together after the morning meeting.
Steinbach obviously didn't have any interest in hearing what 1 had
to say, but I figured 1 would just be further criticized if 1 excluded
him.
2016-09-01
13:20:37, Thu
OUTBOX
I'm going to try to call Eric now, because of course he's not here
because Andy's not here. Then 1 get to tell Andy and tell him what 1
just said.
2016-09-01
13:39:45, Thu
INBOX
Hope it goes well. What are you going to say? Just what you told all
of them?
2016-09-01
13:41:22, Thu
OUTBOX
Yes. Doing it now.
2016-09-01
14:07:14, Thu
INBOX
Yes. For a call?
2016-09-01
14:07:28, Thu
OUTBOX
If you can. Nothing major
2016-09-01
16:12:48, Thu
INBOX
Hi. How you dping?
2016-09-01 .
16:27:47, Thu
OUTBOX
Fine. Spoke to Eric. Went okay. Something relevant to you, but can
tell you later.
2016-09-01
16:29:30, Thu
INBOX
He have any insight? \n\nGopd? Bad? Neither?
2016-09-01
16:34:53, Thu
OUTBOX
Potentially bad.
2016-09-01
16:36:04, Thu
OUTBOX
No, he took what Steinbach said as truth, said it made sense once
we spoke. Same old sh*t.
2016-09-01
16:37:23, Thu
INBOX
What did Steinbach say? That Andy yelled at him? Or something
else?
2016-09-01
16:37:31, Thu
INBOX
1 can call later, too
2016-09-01
16:38:12, Thu
OUTBOX
Let's just talk later. It's not clear what he said, just some things that
Eric implied.
68
DOJ-PROD-0000234
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-01
16:53:36, Thu
INBOX
Talk now?
2016-09-01
17:09:29, Thu
OUTBOX
Sorry, was in with Baker..1 can talk in 2.
2016-09-01
17:10:05, Thu
INBOX
Sorry, can't now. 15 min?
2016-09-01
17:11:14, Thu
OUTBOX
Baker ran into Steinbach, who complained about me. Steinbach
and Coleman want to talk to Andy.
2016-09-01
17:22:13, Thu
INBOX
F them. \U0001f621\U0001f621\U0001f621\U0001f621\n\nCall
you in 3 minutes
2016-09-01
17:59:15, Thu
INBOX
Man I'm angry
2016-09-01
17:59:29, Thu
INBOX
For you
2016-09-01
OUTBOX
18:01:53, Thu
2016-09-01
18:03:00, Thu
INBOX
Believe me, no way 1 try and do that any time soon. \U0001f61e
2016-09-01
18:03:18, Thu
INBOX
I'm sorry. And I’m frustrated, all on top of angry.
2016-09-01
18:03:32, Thu
INBOX
You DO good work.
2016-09-01
18:04:19, Thu
INBOX
What did Jim recommend? Anything?
2016-09-01
18:07:23, Thu
OUTBOX
He doesn't know what to do, He honestly said he didn't know what
to recommend.
2016-09-01
18:07:48, Thu
OUTBOX
Just got another call from quinn re MYE. Should 1 direct his call to
Steinbach?
2016-09-01
18:08:03, Thu
INBOX
Hah. No.
2016-09-01
18:09:05, Thu
INBOX
Thats who Bill told me to coordinate the
thing with. Mike can take over "messaging" from
here....
2016-09-01
18:19:21, Thu
INBOX
Speaking of media, did you see the Wash Times quotes the OPA
person shared with 1 (And why Would have thought one
of us, us including Jon and Bill)
2016-09-01
18:19:29, Thu
INBOX
They worry me a bit
2016-09-01
18:19:33, Thu
OUTBOX
1 have mye questions. No one is around.
2016-09-01
18:19:50, Thu
INBOX
Ask away
2016-09-01
18:20:30, Thu
OUTBOX
I'm not typing it all out. Forget it.
69
DOJ-PROD-0000235
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-01
18:20:42, Thu
INBOX
Seriously, 1 can hop on eras and answer if 1 don’t have them off the
top of my head. Or are they legal?
2016-09-01
18:20:59, Thu
INBOX
Can you talk to me and ask?
2016-09-01
18:21:03, Thu
OUTBOX
No. Factual. Three more comments from the wash times.
2016-09-01
18:21:09, Thu
OUTBOX
Yes, if you can talk.
2016-09-01
18:38:33, Thu
INBOX
Def get with for legal analysis. FRA contains language about
each agency establishing record keeping procedures, and 1 vaguely
recall it’s not clear that she was not in compliance with State's
program at the time.
INBOX
Obviously if Andy is good with the statement, I'm not adding "me
too"!
OUTBOX
Need to go to wrap. Because I'm so stupid and loyal 1 stayed here
the same day so that Andy doesn't miss anything.
2016-09-01
23:16:49, Thu
OUTBOX
I can't. Now the Midyear production has to happen tomorrow. And
you and and are all out.
2016-09-01
23:22:58, Thu
What is production at this point? Certainly, that you can't do from
home?
2016-09-01
23:26:00, Thu
OUTBOX
Yeah, and get everyone the copies they need, and tell baker and
doj and wait for all the hill notifications and tell the agency. I'm not
giving State an advance warning. F them.
2016-09-01
23:42:11, Thu
INBOX
Email. They all have secretaries who can print for them. Jason
handles the hill. It will ALL work out without you there
2016-09-01
23:51:41, Thu
INBOX
And yes, totally. F State. No heads up
2016-09-02
01:00:54, Fri
OUTBOX
Yeah, well you can add that to the list of things that is never going
to happen, like me gaining the respect of superiors simply because
i work hard and do a good job.
2016-09-02
01:02:15, Fri
OUTBOX
I'm also incredibly disappointed in Bill. I would have hoped for
some follow-up from him. Even just feedback or thanks or
disagreement or something. But instead he just fell off the map.
2016-09-02 INBOX
01:05:08, Fri
\n\nl think Bill is busy and worried about
H7462where he stands with his boss, and based on what Mike told
him, with Andy. I'm not there to bounce things off of, so it makes it
worse. That will be ok. From what you said, he was the only stand
_u dsuv a t vour meeting ._
2016-09-02
01:26:56, Fri
INBOX
You should take tomorrow off.
2016-09-02
01:27:30, Fri
INBOX
The Bu will continue as it has for decades.
2016-09-02
01:37:20, Fri
OUTBOX
You know I'm not going to stay home. You can stop insisting.
2016-09-02
01:38:32, Fri
INBOX
And I'm not going to stop telling you that’s a bad decision, that the
bureau - and MYE - will be just fine
70
DOJ-PROD-OOOCI236
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-02
01:40:53, Fri
2016-09-02
01:41:23, Fri
2016-09-02
01:46:3 5, Fri
'2016-09-02
01:46:43, Fri
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
I promise you...tell me, what needs to be done that can't be done
by you via phone or email OR by someone else?\n\nTake the day,
INBOX
2016-09-02
01:46:54, Fri
2016-09-02
01:47:00, Fri
2016-09-02
01:47:01. Fri
2016-09-02
01:47:08, Fri
2016-09-02
01:47:14, Fri
2016-09-02
01:49:22, Fri
2016-09-02
01:49:51, Fri
2016-09-02
01:49: 55, Fri
2016-09-02
01: 50:12, Fri
2016-09-02
01:50:25, Fri
2016-09-02
01:50:41, Fri
2016-09-02
01:51:11, Fri
2016-09-02
01:51:23, Fri
2016-09-02
01:52:44, Fri
2016-09-02
01:53:02, Fri
OUTBOX
INBOX
'INBOX
; INBOX
INBOX
I INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
'INBOX
Note the bcc. Because, I've already spoken to about this
today once already. In addition to the tri-weekly email I get from
Laufman. _
Yup, I'll just do it from home.
WHO IS THE SOMEONE ELSE?!
Stop. Now you're just insulting me.
YOU CAN STAY HOME
Make the calls from home
Tell everyone "call so-and-so and email me when you're done"
Then call OPA and tell them to release
And DOJ is a wild pain in the ass
Not as bad as 5tate, but still
Yes, George. I know we have to call counsel.
Lisa, I don't think that's the right decision, and i dont agree. But
having said that, and meaning it , I'll l eave it alone. _
And what's the other agency reference? Is that State?
I don't know. I assumed it was WH
DoJ has NO obligation as far as I'm aware of.
71
DOJ-PROD-OOOCI237
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-02
01:55:38, Fri
OUTBOX
Forgot to show you this text from Eric, who is essentially blaming
me for Andy's late hours:\n\nGood deal. 1 also want to stay a little
tighter in the future so we can ensure Unity of effort for both Andy
and the whole floor. This will also help in streamlining any after
wrap discussions with Andy as 1 want to try and get him out the
door at a more reasonable hour then what he has been doing. And
that goes for you too!
•
2016-09-02
01:58:21, Fri
INBOX
Andy's the DD. He's going to be late. You've got nothing to do with
it. \U0001f612
2016-09-02
01:59:49, Fri
OUTBOX
What I wanted to respond is how is staying tighter going to allow
Andy to get out earlier? Is Eric going to cover my questions?
2016-09-02
02:07:01, Fri
2016-09-02
13:41:30, Fri
2016-09-02
13:42:40, Fri_
2016-09-02
13:42:46, Fri
2016-09-02
13:49:39, Fri
2016-09-02
13:50:29, Fri
2016-09-02
13:55:21, Fri
2016-09-02
15:38:05, Fri
2016-09-02"
16:04:46, Fri
2016-09-02
16:05:34, Fri
2016-09-02
16:07:35, Fri
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
HNBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
whe ther he wants that? _
Exactly. No. Maybe it will allow him to understand the depth of
what you're doing._
Which I'm fine with. So just sit down with us after wrap. But don’t
make more goddamn work for me.
Yeah I’m not sure what he thinks he's accomplishing other than
understanding what you're doing. At which point he'll say (if he’s
smart), oh, wow, that's a lot, and then let you go. After wasting
your time.
Checkout my 9:30 mtg on the 7th
I can tell you why you're having that meeting.
It's not what you think.
Yes, be potus wants to know everything we are doing.
I'm sure an honest answer will come out of that
meeting....\U0001f612 _
never knocks on the door. It's kind of weird.\n\nWhat are
you doing? Why are you gone so much? God!
\U0001 f61d\U0001f61d\U0001f61d\U0001f61d\U0001f61d
Thoughts on email? Maybe just send her a copy of FOIA?
There's more to discuss. Don't feel like typing.
Work call after lunch? I also have 5 now before food arrives
Just tried calling...will hit you after lunch
72
DOJ-PROD-0000238
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-02
17:26:11, Fri
INBOX
NYTimes.com breaking
2016-09-02
17:26:49, Fri
INBOX
You saw the byline, right?
2016-09-02
18:07:01, Fri
OUTBOX
It helps that the Director and Deputy really hate these phones too.
And really love their personal iphones.
2016-09-02
18:09:05, Fri
INBOX
Now if Tim Cook would only fall off the face of the earth
2016-09-02
20:57:43, Fri
INBOX
Def still up for coming in Sun to work magic. \n\nAnd 1 mean that
work-wise, I'm really excited about writing it into his
language.\n\n\U0001f60b\U0001f636
2016-09-02
22:08:19, Fri
INBOX
1 love our Director
2016-09-02
22:08:40, Fri
OUTBOX
1 know. 1 do too.
2016-09-02
22:10:00, Fri
OUTBOX
You obviously did not get a hold of Bill.
2016-09-02
22:10:42, Fri
INBOX
What? More? He didn't send whatever it was to me. Please
forward?
2016-09-02
22:10:58, Fri
INBOX
And no, 1 didn't. No office answer, no cell.
2016-09-02
22:11:15, Fri
OUTBOX
What were you talking about then?
2016-09-02
22:11:52, Fri
OUTBOX
The Grassley email you meant, right? 1 did too.
2016-09-02
22:12:35, Fri
OUTBOX
If he doesn't call tonight 1 would freaking call SIOC and them
connect you to his home.
2016-09-02
OUTBOX
Please tell me this absence means you're talking to Bill...
22:39:45, Fri
2016-09-02
22:40:26, Fri
INBOX
Yes. Just got done talking with him. Talk? is here so will be work
2016-09-02
22:42:21, Fri
OUTBOX
No. Please tell me
he has relaxed
2016-09-02
22:45:04, Fri
INBOX
Yes. Call for data came at wrap (jr and bowdich) for desire for D to
have data to chew on.\n\nHe also talked about your meeting with
everyone to try and clear air. Remind me, though nothing really
there to reDort
2016-09-02
22:48:53, Fri
OUTBOX
Got it. But we are still writing the op ed, yes?
2016-09-02
22:51:05, Fri
INBOX
Yes, -ish. He said too much data, would be good to identify the key
pieces of data and frame it in an argument, but not to spend "too
much time on the opening or closing." 1 told him we were too much
of perfectionists to not do all of it.
2016-09-03
00:28:51, Sat
OUTBOX
Gotta say, most of the coverage has been quite favorable.
\n\nF.B.I. Papers Offer Closer Look at Hillary Clinton Email Inquiry
http://nvti.ms/2cfM00m
2016-09-03
00:29:15, Sat
OUTBOX
And crap, we should have told the agents/analysts that the docs
were coming out today. \U0001f615
73
DOJ-PROD-0000239
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-03 INBOX I did tell them
00:51:32, Sat _
2016-09-03 INBOX That nyt article was pretty good
01:28:30, Sat _
2016-09-03 INBOX This was also good. Probably what in would have noted,
01:30:05, Sat too:\nhttp://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/09/03/us/politics/6-things-
2016-09-04 INBOX I told him I may drive in
15:53:13, Sun I__
2016-09-05 I OUTBOX An article to share: Intelligence community investigating covert
10:50:01, Mon Russian influence operations in the United States\nlntelligence
community investigating covert Russian influence operations in the
United States\nhttp://wapo.st/2c0UA2H
INBOX
This is the one was taking about 1 think
2016-09-05
10:52:37, Mon
OUTBOX
Yup. It is very well sourced. 100% authorized.
2016-09-05
10:54:03, Mon
'INBOX
Doesn't really look like it
2016-09-05
10:54:26, Mon
OUTBOX
Not really.
2016-09-05
11:02:09, Mon
INBOX
Just read the article. We say a lot of the same things. 1 guess that's
ok. .
2016-09-05
11:02:42, Mon
OUTBOX
Yeah, but that's why ours is going to need to be more folksy. So it's
not like a news article.
2016-09-05
11:02:48, Mon
INBOX
1 have really no faith the administration will deal with it effectively
2016-09-05
11:02:56, Mon
OUTBOX
Nope. You shouldn't.
2016-09-05
11:19:54, Mon
INBOX
1 am losing my mind because 1 can't get my stupid laptop to
connect to FBINET. 1 got up early to see the draft you giys worked
on but no dice. Want to spike it in the street.
2016-09-05
11:50:03, Mon
INBOX
Sorry. I'm going to try in a bit. Came up with a lot of little edits
2016-09-05
11:55:42, Mon
INBOX
1 can't go in today so if 1 can't connect in the next hour or so I'll just
have to see it tomorrow. Obviously fire it off to the AD though. I'm
sure it's great. Won't take my password for some reason...
2016-09-05
INBOX
After inputting edits in eras.\n\nLet me
14:08:22, Mon
know when you leave.
2016-09-05
14:11:20, Mon
OUTBOX
Left
74
DOJ-PROD-0000240
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-05
15:10:03, Mon
INBOX iJust sent op-ed to Bill, cc:ed both of you.
2016-09-05
22:50:03, Mon
INBOX
And ooh, you're at ODNI on Wed. LX? H8013Me too! From 11:30
till 2:00. I’ll give you a ride!
2016-09-05
22:58:18, Mon
OUTBOX
No, only if trisha wants me to, and I'm sure she won't.
2016-09-05
23:08:07, Mon
INBOX : Can you just go? Or go to my thing then go to the other one since
you're there?
2016-09-05
23:19:47, Mon
OUTBOX
I'm sure that would cause some turmoil (why is Lisa there and not
nslb...)
2016-09-05
INBOX
23:21:37, Mon
2016-09-05
23:27:36, Mon
OUTBOX
Yes! About what?
2016-09-05
23:39:35, Mon
INBOX
Gotta figure that out tomorrow. Insider threat perhaps. Maybe
Electoral shenanigans. I'm between Clapper and Evanina and
another person or two
2016-09-06
11:39:31, Tue
OUTBOX
Stupid ass and 1 and 1 don't think she was successful.
\UQ001f621
2016-09-06
11:40:41, Tue
OUTBOX
At clearing the air.
\U0001f621\U0001f621\U0001f621\U0001f621\U0001f621
2016-09-06
11:43:02, Tue
INBOX
Got it. You going to talk to him? You said at the time he backed you
up.
2016-09-06
11:43:37, Tue
INBOX
But might be better to let it go for now?
2016-09-06
11:44:00, Tue
OUTBOX
He just didn't leave me out the hanging, but he didn't say, thanks
for explaining or anything like that.
2016-09-06
11:44:05, Tue
INBOX
And 1 know \U0001f614
2016-09-06
11:46:02, Tue
INBOX
How about go to him, say, you know how you said you appreciated
it when 1 gave you honest feedback, that that's rare? I’d appreciate
the same from you. What do you think about how last week
unfolded?
2016-09-06
11:46:19, Tue
INBOX
But you CANNOT burn me as a source...
2016-09-06
11:47:19, Tue
OUTBOX
And I'm far more pissed that after doing it, he didn't come to me
separately and say thanks or I'm not sure you made any progress
but thanks anyway or ANYTHING.
2016-09-06
11:47:49, Tue
OUTBOX
Nope. F it. He wants to lose an ally, so be it.
2016-09-06
11:59:41, Tue
INBOX
1 think he was feeling the results of Mike talking to him. Put
yourself in his shoes, with his personality. Not saying he's right, but
I'm saying he’s thoughtful and different from Mike and Randy.
\n\nWhile I'd be angry, too, 1 wouldn't throw out an ally/work
friendship over it._
2016-09-06
INBOX
He didn't sell you out. Just understand his personality and your
12:00:11, Tue
relationship and consider that.
75
DOJ-PROD-0000241
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-06
12:20:47, Tue
OUTBOX
Maybe not. But if that's just "his personality" I'm sure not going to
stick my neck out for him again. HE doesn't want the headache?
Yeah, well 1 don't either.
2016-09-06
12:28:42, Tue
INBOX
Look, 1 get it. I'm as frustrated as you are. 1 can understand not
sticking your neck out, too.
2016-09-06
12:29:05, Tue
INBOX
A different frustration -1 didn't get burned like you did
2016-09-06
OUTBOX
And good^J is still not back from
13:19:37, Tue
2016-09-06
13:51:23, Tue
INBOX
2016-09-06
INBOX
13:51:36, Tue
2016-09-06
21:01:58, Tue
INBOX
Hi..Funny (not haha) convo with Nflike. Call me when you're done.
And 1 have no expectation my wrap will be done before 6, so if you
can get the hell out of here before then, go. .
2016-09-06
22:19:40, Tue
INBOX
And gosh that was a fast wrap....
2016-09-06
22:47:47, Tue
INBOX
And your silly TWO HOUR OVER LUNCH brief on Friday is Hill prep,
guessing for Jason. You him Baker is out. Let
me know if 1 can/should join.
2016-09-06
23:10:34, Tue
INBOX
Were your ears burning? Just talked about you for 30 minutes with
Bill.\n\nln part about what he's going to say to Andy.\n\nWho he's
trying to call right now.
2016-09-06
23:12:27, Tue
OUTBOX
Sigh. Thank you. Can you give me the quick recap?
2016-09-06
INBOX
On a call?
23:26:05, Tue
2016-09-06
23:26:30, Tue
OUTBOX No. Yleeting Andy at 0700 to talk about
operational stuff. Will Bill tell you of he connected with andy? Also,
did he provide further info re how you came up?
2016-09-06
23:26:38, Tue
INBOX
Meaning, I'm driving, and it's hard for me to text that. 1 would be
happy to tell you on the phone.
2016-09-06
23:27:00, Tue
OUTBOX
Got it, sorry, 1 can't for about 30.
2016-09-06
23:27:10, Tue
INBOX
1 don't think he will tonight.
2016-09-06
23:27:27, Tue
INBOX
He didn't (re me)
2016-09-06
23:28:02, Tue
OUTBOX
1 will probably email bill and ask him if he'd be willing to tell me if
they talk, just so 1 know what 1 am walking into.
2016-09-06
23:28:11, Tue
INBOX
Brought the topic up, but didn't specifically ask. A lot to talk about.
Nothing earthshaking. Just a lot of detail.
2016-09-06
23:29:09, Tue
INBOX
1 think you'd be fine with that. Obviously don’t reference our
talking about it.
2016-09-06
23:29:12, Tue
INBOX
He'd not you'd
76
DOJ-PROD-0000242
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-06
23:29:49, Tue
OUTBOX
Of course. 1 presume a call later not worth it the trouble for you?
2016-09-06
23:30:08, Tue
INBOX
And I'm now more worried about me. Think Jon is fine
2016-09-06
23:31:01, Tue
INBOX
Depends,
2016-09-06
23:31:13, Tue
OUTBOX
You have nothing to worry about. They'll both be gone before your
next job. AND they both like you. It's ME they don't like.
2016-09-06
23:31:47, Tue
OUTBOX
Is it detail i need to know before tomorrow?
/
2016-09-06
23:33:39, Tue
INBOX
A) then why you and Bill both getting by name mentions of me\nB)
no. Only the fresher it is, the more detail.
2016-09-06
23:34:05, Tue
INBOX
I'm old and forgetful.;)
2016-09-06
23:55:58, Tue
OUTBOX
A) Pete, it's going to be fine. Don't make this something else to
unnecessarily worry about. Your reputation precedes you, and the
D and DD think you're great. Worry about those things that matter.
2016-09-06
23:58:08, Tue
INBOX
Sigh. I want to believe that but for my boss mentioning it to me.
Just ignore that?
2016-09-06
23:58:53, Tue
OUTBOX
It's a mention about perception. Be aware of perception. 1 wouldn't
worry further than that.
2016-09-06
23:59:51, Tue
OUTBOX
And uh yeah, your advice for me, even when you know I am in the
line of fire, is always, f them. So...
2016-09-07
00:01:02, Wed
INBOX
You're leaving in 18 months. And you work directly for the DD.
2016-09-07
00:01:34, Wed
OUTBOX
1 don’t have another job, and when he leaves 1 have no job.
2016-09-07
00:01:53, Wed
OUTBOX
I'm just saying if the advice is good enough for me...
2016-09-07
00:01:54, Wed
INBOX
1 also sometimes advise you to keep your head down ;)
2016-09-07
00:04:22, Wed
INBOX
1 appreciate what you're telling me. I'm saying advice for you and
me may be slightly different. 1 am part of that white male agent
hierarchy. Well below the DD.\n\nAnd i fully appreciate your
advice to be aware of the perception and otherwise F them, keep
working hard.
2016-09-07
00:05:32, Wed
OUTBOX
That white male hierarchy that NEVER eats its own. That pushes
even idiots forward for promotion. 1 think you're going to be okay.
2016-09-07
INBOX
Sigh.
00:06:40, Wed
2016-09-07
00:09:17, Wed
OUTBOX
I don't know. 1 think 1 was feeling momentarily resentful at your
worry. Yours is speculative and distant, mine is front and center
and the in fact named problem.
2016-09-07
00:09:30, Wed
OUTBOX
Probably not bring fair to you, 1 realize.
77
DOJ-PROD-0000243
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-07
00:13:21, Wed
INBOX
Lisa. It's not. 1 was feeling the same resentment. My boss told me
specifically 1 was mentioned, including in the context of Pete going
around the chain of command to get Lisa to feed something to
Andy. 1 did not make that up. 1 am not exaggerating that. Thus isn't
ALL you, nor is it a zero sum game, not is it a comparison or
competition. But simply waving my concerns aside, saying "it's ail
2016-09-07
01:18:30, Wed
INBOX
Oh. And prepping Bill tonight to call Andy. Tack that somewhere in
the second sentence, above.
2016-09-07
01:44:43, Wed
OUTBOX
And don't conflate my email to Bill with my gratitude for you.
That's totally unfair.
2016-09-07
OUTBOX
01:55:45, Wed
I'm meeting andy at 0700.
2016-09-07
02:44:54, Wed
INBOX
Btw, realistically you think you'll have time to talk or coffee
tomorrow am? Guessing you'll go straight from 7:00 into morning
Intel brief, right?
2016-09-07
11:37:22, Wed
INBOX
Need to talk to you on work issue
2016-09-07
11:37:30, Wed
INBOX
We've got time
2016-09-07
11:37:46, Wed
INBOX
1 can talk work on the way there and back
2016-09-07
11:37:47, Wed
OUTBOX
K. One sec. Will call from ofc phone.
2016-09-07
11:37:56, Wed
OUTBOX
K. Let's go.
2016-09-07
11:38:06, Wed
OUTBOX
Meet you in ctyard
2016-09-07
11:38:48, Wed
OUTBOX
Let's just do Starbucks. There's not time.
2016-09-07
12:45:33, Wed
INBOX
Hey just stopped by your office.
\U0001f60a
2016-09-07
12:50:40, Wed
OUTBOX
Sorry, went to see
2016 09-07
12:50:47, Wed
OUTBOX
Headed back now
2016-09-07
12:57:11, Wed
INBOX
K will swing by now on way to Jason's
2016-09-07
13:00:00, Wed
INBOX
At Jason's
2016-09-07
13:00:11, Wed
OUTBOX
Okay, be right there.
2016-09-07
14:24:10, Wed
INBOX
Hoooo boy. Call me
2016-09-07
15:21:42, Wed
INBOX
Finishing SC mtg, 5 min
2016-09-07
19:49:00, Wed
fNBOX
Just got done with Castor.
78
DOJ-PROD-0000244
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-07
22:15:34, Wed
OUTBOX
Andy not going to reply all. 1 am furious. Don't call back.
2016-09-07
22:23:26, Wed
OUTBOX
So, do 1 call him and explain why not responding by email entirely
undermines me?
2016-09-07
23:11:54, Wed
Def don't email. Talk to him. NOT tonight
2016-09-07
23:12:26, Wed
OUTBOX
I'm not unless he calls. I'm actually not going by his ofc unless he
calls.
2016-09-07
23:16:20, Wed
OUTBOX
But I am absolutely enraged. He is purposefully choosing to save
Mike and Dave's face at my expense.
2016-09-07
23:39:22, Wed
INBOX
Lis. You must talk to him. But don't do it tonight.
BUM
INBOX
I'm sorry. You must be livid
2016-09-07
23:40:10, Wed
OUTBOX
1 am. 1 texted him this:\n\nl would like to speak to you before you
talk to Steinbach and Bowdich about their email.
2016-09-07
23:40:47, Wed
OUTBOX
So it doesn't have to be tonight; we'll see what he says.
2016-09-08
00:19:34, Thu
INBOX
Of course let me know how it goes with JB. And if he's not there,
call me \U0001f614\u2764
2016-09-08
00:31:52, Thu
INBOX
Great. Now i have daily meetings, twice a day either CyD. An hour
long each. 930-1030 and 4-5.
2016-09-08
00:32:35, Thu
INBOX
Because their division is in incapable of pulling its head out of its
ass. 1 don't have two hours a day to give to this b*******.
DMtli
INBOX
Now I'm livid....1 do not have two hours a day to throw at this.
2016-09-08
00:45:08, Thu
OUTBOX
You should be. That's an utter waste.
2016-09-08
00:45:33, Thu
OUTBOX
Twice a day. That is so outrageous.
2016-09-08
00:46:31, Thu
INBOX
And inexplicably, no one, not even after the director's comments
today, is willing to say: cyber is f***** up. Cyber needs to fix itself.
Cybers way of doing business is unacceptable.
2016-09-08
00:47:00, Thu
OUTBOX
Well that's the profile in courage of you EAD.
2016-09-08
00:47:05, Thu
INBOX
Instead, everybody has to be a little wrong, everybody has to be a
little right. Randy and Mike bear nothing. They grind their divisions
under them to a halt.
2016-09-08
00:48:38, Thu
INBOX
So instead, other stuff will drop. 1 hope Andy in the director happy.
1 hope the opportunity cost to the FBI is worth it.
2016-09-08
01:18:21, Thu
OUTBOX
Sorry for the delay, was just on with . God, 1 see right through
her...
2016-09-08
01:19:07, Thu
INBOX
What did she want \U0001f612
79
DOJ-PROD-0000245
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-08
01:20:32, Thu
OUTBOX
Oh, just make sure 1 understood where things were on the
paper, trying to talk Axelrod because he's "so angry" with how this
came over to them. 1 told her not to put herself out too much, if
Matt wants to call and veil at Andv it's fine.
2016-09-08
01:20:47, Thu
OUTBOX
It's all perception management.
2016-09-08
01:21:05, Thu
INBOX
And funny quote of the evening. " upon my arrival, 1 made the
mistake of believing Americans understood irony."
2016-09-08
01:21:16, Thu
INBOX
1 really do love the British.
2016-09-08
01:21:30, Thu
OUTBOX
Was it a nice night?
2016-09-08
01:22:17, Thu
INBOX
Meh. Would have been far better with you there. 1 got to speak on
behalf of Counter Intelligence Division, so it's good 1 was there.
2016-09-08
01:22:54, Thu
OUTBOX
That is good.
2016-09-08
01:25:03, Thu
INBOX
Did you get ahold of Baker?
2016-09-08
01:27:48, Thu
OUTBOX
I did. Good conversation, he gets it, offered to say something but 1
said no. Said there was no question that it was a request from the
DD.
2016-09-08
01:28:46, Thu
INBOX
He have any ideas how you should approach Andy?
2016-09-08
01:28:52, Thu
OUTBOX
Says 1 need to keep trying to cultivate a relationship with
Steinbach, ask him to coffee or lunch or a drink. I'm not sure 1 will
try that.
2016-09-08
01:29:26, Thu
OUTBOX
I’m just going to explain to andy why it is important to me that he
respond via email.
2016-09-08
01:30:23, Thu
INBOX
out of here, right?
2016-09-08
01:30:51, Thu
INBOX
And while you may not be cultivating him, it's not like you're a jerk
to him.
2016-09-08
01:31:29, Thu
OUTBOX
1 told him I was thinking of stepping down if he does not.
2016-09-08
01:31:38, Thu
OUTBOX
He is, once he finds a job.
2016-09-08
01:32:20, Thu
INBOX
What did he say to that?
2016-09-08
01:32:24, Thu
OUTBOX
Baker doesn't think 1 should. I told him if he said no re the email,
that 1 would come talk to him first.
2016-09-08
01:32:58, Thu
OUTBOX
But when 1 say that it means Andy doesn't really have my back, he
understands why 1 would. And while I feel that way.
2016-09-08
01:34:05, Thu
OUTBOX
I’m very disappointed that Andy didn't reach out tonight.
2016-09-08
01:51:11, Thu
OUTBOX
Boy, this guy is a big R like you.\n\nFortress of Tedium: What 1
Learned as a Substitute Teacher. http://nyti.ms/2crUNfV
80
DOJ-PROD-OOOCI246
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-08
01:52:52, Thu
OUTBOX
Andy just replied, said " Already spoke to S before 1 went to WH.
Let's talk in the morning." \n\nl said okay.
2016-09-08
01:56:31, Thu
INBOX
was there tonight but 1 didn't get a chance to talk with him.
Probably figured I'd be furious with him about the
2016-09-08
01:56:41, Thu
INBOX
He'd be right
2016-09-08
01:56:42, Thu
INBOX
Talked to John G
2016-09-08
01:57:23, Thu
OUTBOX
How's he doing? He's a decent human being. And not an
egomaniac.
2016-09-08
01:57:24, Thu
INBOX
Mye notwithstanding, 1 really like him. Huge heart
2016-09-08
01:58:24, Thu
INBOX
And god, now 1 want to know what Andy said. Like Right Now.
2016-09-08
01:58:30, Thu
2016-09-08
INBOX
.
01:58:31, Thu
.
2016 09-08
01:58:56, Thu
INBOX
He is a very decent human being. Told him we should get lunch.
2016-09-08
01:59:04, Thu
OUTBOX
He does. Bad judgment re mye, but genuinely good person.
2016-09-08
01:59:33, Thu
INBOX
Yep. Completely agree. And that makes him good in my book,
2016-09-08
02:00:53, Thu
INBOX
Good response from Andy, 1 think. Right??
2016-09-08
02:00:54, Thu
INBOX
2016-09-08
02:01:16, Thu
INBOX
2016-09-08
02:01:18, Thu
INBOX
2016-09-08
02:08:38, Thu
INBOX
1 think it's better than thay
2016-09-08
02:10:08, Thu
OUTBOX
1 don't. He still did it to protect Steinbach.
2016-09-08
02:11:51, Thu
INBOX
Not emailing, you mean?
2016-09-08
02:12:49, Thu
INBOX
Wait and decide what you think after you talk.
2016-09-08
02:13:09, Thu
INBOX
Same as waiting until after Bill finally talked to you
2016-09-08
02:13:31, Thu
INBOX
1 think (god 1 pray) it will be better after you talk to Andy
2016-09-08
02:16:57, Thu
OUTBOX
Well if it's not I'll leave. Make the same amount of money, be more
bored, but have a better life.
81
DOJ-PROD-OOOCI247
2016-09-08
22:54:10, Thu
2016-09-08
23:22:44, Thu
2016-09-08
23:24:02, Thu
God I want to drive by with this report...
It went extremely well. I am grateful for his call.
He do it on his own or at Andy/JB's urging?
2016-09-08
23:24:10, Thu
INBOX
How long?
2016-09-08
23:24:40, Thu
'OUTBOX
I don't know. Am emailing/thanking/informing andy and Jb now.
2016-09-08
23:33:26, Thu
INBOX
Well gosh now 1 want to hear about it more than you want to see
the report!
2016-09-08
23:38:01, Thu
INBOX
Ack!!!!! Details! Synopsis!
2016-09-08
23:38:31, Thu
OUTBOX
It was honestly very helpful. Not that he told me anything 1 didn't
know (7th floor is political, perception matters, etc.}, but just him
simply acknowledging the issues, the balancing that needs to
happen, how you still won't please everyone gives me the room to
include him more in the failings 1 report to Andy, etc.
2016-09-08
23:39:31, Thu
OUTBOX
reached out to him. 1 love that kid. \U0001f636
2016-09-08
23:42:35, Thu
OUTBOX
I am lucky. Thank you too, for your friendship. 1 couldn't survive
any of this without you.
2016-09-08
23:45:29, Thu
INBOX
Not following entirely:\n gives me the room to include him more in
the failings I report to Andy\n\nDoes that mean you trust him
more to tel! him problems?
82
DOJ-PROD-0000248
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-08
23:51:15, Thu
OUTBOX
Yes, potentially. It may never happen, but at least now he has
opened the door to the possibility of that happening. I'll have to
explain more tomorrow, unless you can talk quickly now.
2016-09-09
OUTBOX
Thank you. \U0001f636 Jon sent a text checking in, made me
00:30:12, Fri
realize he and Bill should know.
2016-09-09
00:43:06, Fri
INBOX
2016-09-09
OUTBOX
Aaron wants to get coffee at 0730 this weekend.
00:58:17, Fri
\U0001f61d\U0001f61d\U0001f61d
2016-09-09
01:02:27, Fri
INBOX
I'd like to see Aaron with you \U0001f636
2016-09-09
INBOX
01:55:42, Fri
2016-09-09
INBOX
01:56:04, Fri
2016-09-09
OUTBOX
01:56:47, Fri
2016-09-09
OUTBOX
01:56:59, Fri
2016-09-09
01:57:45, Fri
INBOX
2016-09-09
INBOX
01:57:46, Fri
2016-09-09
01:57:50, Fri
OUTBOX
^■
2016-09-09
INBOX
Matt Laurer's an idiot
02:19:02, Fri
\nhttp://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/09/09/opinion/a-debate-
disaster-waiting-to-happen.html
2016-09-09
INBOX
Glad things
02:39:00, Fri
worked out with you, Andy and Mike \u263a
2016-09-09
11:52:19, Fri
OUTBOX
It was. I'm glad mye didn't start up until the end of summer.
2016-09-09
OUTBOX
You need to show me that report that told you
17:23:08, Fri
about yesterday!
2016-09-09
INBOX
Ah yes. Standby let me get it
17:34:32, Fri
*
2016-09-09
17:34:58, Fri
OUTBOX
Sweet. might be in here when you come. Just knock.
2016-09-09
18:31:04, Fri
INBOX
1 need my crimes report. I'll stop by on the. Way to QPA at 315
2016-09-09
20:26:29, Fri "
OUTBOX
1 want to hear about too!
2016-09-09
20:27:13, Fri
INBOX
1 don't tell Bill what Castor said, right?
2016-09-09
OUTBOX
Let me.
20:27:35, Fri
2016-09-09
OUTBOX
Not today.
20:27:49, Fri
83
DOJ-PROD-0000249
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-10
00:25:43, Sat
OUTBOX
No prob. Just calling to say 1 called jason, told him everything,
including having a call without him. He totally agreed. Told him 1
would draft TPs this weekend too, he's grateful for it.
2016-09-10
00:27:32, Sat
INBOX
\u263a thanks. I'd like to help, obviously
2016-09-10
00:28:24, Sat
OUTBOX
I'd appreciate it, obviously. Going to send an email to mye core
team to tell them I'll draft TPs this weekend, but will likeiy need a
look Sunday night.
2016-09-10
00:30:29, Sat
INBOX
\u263a5till thinking to draft on Sunday?
2016-09-10
00:56:08, Sat
2016-09-10
01:01:49, Sat
2016-09-10
01:05:07. Sat
2016-09-10
01:06:1 9, Sat
2016-09-10
11:50:25 , Sat
2016-09-10
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
2016-09-10 i INBOX
12:37:16, Sat
Yeah, think so. Maybe Saturday night. We'll see.
If sets up the call the real test will be whether he sends
me the call in info. I am angry, Pete. \U0001f621 _
Just ask Andy, no? The problem is no one on that call has
knowledge of the case anywhere near you. Face was
utterly absent for it. Not saying he shouldn't be there, but include
Bill. And, obviouslv. vou.
Oh, I'll get the info. I just have a feeling I'm going to be left off
"accidentally."
God, I'm really in a bad mood now.
2016-09-10
11:58:56, Sat
OUTBOX
Re I'm not sure he has the intellectual curiosity to call in.
How's that for an insult?
2016-09-10
12:16:16, Sat
INBOX
And re my last. I'd add that at this point the questions at this point
are organizational risk best answered by people with thoughtful
smarts. And I'm not sure about the group on there, either.
B) thing is, there are VERY inflammatory things in the 302s we
didn't turn over to Congress (because they weren't relevant to
understanding the focus of the investigation) that are going to
come out in FOIA and absolutely inflame Congress. I'm sure Jim
and Trisha and Dave and Mike are all considering how things like
that play out as they talk amongst themselves.
2016-09-10
12:37:38, Sat
INBOX
You never told me what she said; when 1 asked you pushed back a
little.
2016-09-10
12:37:47, Sat
INBOX
So 1 didn't press you on it.
84
DOJ-PROD-0000250
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-10
12:39:01, Sat
OUTBOX
2016-09-10
12:40:30, Sat
2016-09-10
12:41:05, Sat
2016-09-10
12:41:50, Sat
INBOX
OUTBOX
.INBOX
OUTBOX
I'll tell you. Just didn't feel like talking about it that time you
brought it up
B) and as they prep Jason. Who is going to be the first person they
call. That settles it - I'm calling him, of at least giving you material
so he's aware of it (which I GUARANTEE didn't come up yesterday).
Want to imsg it to me, or want to do it in person?
It's not that sensitive.
Ok. You can imsg just for convenience of typing, too, if you want.
I know the material. The :tuff, right? I know it.
2016-09-10
12:45:16, Sat
OUTBOX
And the state shenanigans stuff. Anything else?
2016-09-10
12:48:26, Sat
INBOX
Certainly those. Probably others. All the laptops and media
voluntarily turned over to us by the attorneys ("why didnt you ever
serach this"? "Why isnt this relevant to our oversight
responsibilities"?) 1 want to go read through the ones we didn’t
produce. The point is Reps will try and spin and attack whatever is
in the ones not initially turned over to them.
2016-09-10
12:53:04, Sat
INBOX
Re 302s, didn't search the laptops given to us voluntarily by various
attorneys.
2016-09-10
12:53:49, Sat
OUTBOX
Why not? Decision that it was unlikely to contain info relevant to
our case in like of time constraints?
2016-09-10
12:55:59, Sat
INBOX
They would not consent and we did not have probable cause to get
on them.
2016-09-10
12:56:47, Sat
INBOX
1 will go review the 302s we didn't turn over and send thoughts to
everyone except the 0 corridor recipients. You or Trisha or Jason
can mention to them.
2016-09-10
12:57:00, Sat
OUTBOX
Oh well that's totally defendable. Why did they give them to
us?\n\nYeah, but 1 think that was the context in which it was
meant. I.e., like who sucks more, me or her?
2016-09-10
12:57:21, Sat
OUTBOX
it's not worth your time. I've got it. Truly.
2016-09-10
12:57:48, Sat
OUTBOX
I'll put a placeholder in - there may be more unsavory facts, these
are the ones I'm aware of.
2016-09-10
12:58:32, Sat
INBOX
Because they had classified on them. Classified we already had in
our possession. \n\nLisa, it's a mistake not to have someone from
the investigative team not quietly back benching on these
conversations. 1 know you may not disagree. 1 will prep you as best
1 can.
2016-09-10
12:59:27, Sat
OUTBOX
1 know that! What am 1 supposed to do about it?!
2016-09-10
13:00:10, Sat
OUTBOX
Call for one minute? Question about the laptops.
85
DOJ-PROD-0000251
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-10
13:49:56, Sat
2016-09-10
13:56:46 , Sat
2016-09-10
14:14:24, Sat
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
Did you ever call the State IG re the
allegations?
Can you be on the call at noon? I asked Andy, he said it was a good
idea.
Crap about IG or|
\U0001f621
Frankly, both. Both my fault.
2016-09-10
14:14:35, Sat
OUTBOX
Okay, thanks. Sent you call in info already.
2016-09-10
14:15:05, S at
2016-09-10
14:16:02, Sat
OUTBOX
INBOX
IG. I know is just an oversight. Just not great given timing.
As long as we get it to them before it comes out in FOIA I think
we're ok. I will call him on Mon. Heck, I can leave a vm this
weekend.
2016-09-10
14:16:26, Sat
OUTBOX
No, Monday is fine.
2016-09-10
14:16:35, Sat
OUTBOX
I'll try to set a reminder for us.
2016-09-10
14:24:23, Sat
OUTBOX
Maybe it's for Bowdich. Regardless.
2016-09-10
14:45:06, Sat
INBOX
Re Bowdich, I’d just let it go. Andy's going to be out for a bit so it'll
get worse before it ets better. As 1 think about it, I don't know that
I'd talk to him.
2016-09-10
15:33:13, Sat
INBOX
What?!?!?!?\n"So I'm going to ask Bill to fill in for me"
2016-09-10
15:35:54, Sat
OUTBOX
Yup. It's a small wonder that 1 don't rely on the EADs...
2016-09-10
17:19:25, Sat
OUTBOX
1 am going to go tomorrow morning after Aaron. Probably 9 am or
so. Going to cancel with Would be great if you can be
there, but no worries if not.
2016-09-10
19:32:11, Sat
INBOX
You want to answer Jason?
2016-09-10
19:36:59, Sat
INBOX
Hmm. Ok. \n\nWas thinking of telling Jason his points were raised
and happy to discuss. Don't want to get into a long written
description of thought process on email and particularly on
Samsungs—
2016-09-10
19:38:04, Sat
OUTBOX
But 1 don't think we're an absolute no on this one. Just we're not
going to get to subpoena (ie not going to tell the committee f no),
but we're not conceding vet 1 don’t thinkm
2016-09-10
19:39:48, Sat
INBOX
Oh. 1 got the impression we were going to offer come to HQ for no
Pll redactions as our opening offer...
2016-09-10
19:40:03, Sat
OUTBOX
1 can clarify.
2016-09-10
19:41:55, Sat
INBOX
That was my takeaway from Andy's 2:14 email.
86
DOJ-PROD-OOOCI252
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-11
17:39:37, Sun
Ok, this is just ’•'slightly* over the top.
2016-09-11
21:23:44, Sun
INBOX
2016-09-11 INBOX
21:35:17, Sun
2016-09-11 OUTBOX
22:10:49, Sun
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
2016-09-11
22:12:4 1, Sun
2016-09-11
23:41:27, Sun
2016-09-12
00:20:30, M on
2016-09-12”'
00:21:35, Mon
2016-09-12
00:21:41, Mon
2016-09-12
00:33:47, Mon
2016-09-12
00:40:05, Mon
2016-09-12
01:10:28, Mon
2016-09-12
10:35:45, Mon
\n\nFBI agent climbed
the ranks but chose to end his career back in a field office - The
Washington
Post\nhttps://www. washingtonpost.com/world/national-
security/fbi-agent-climbed-the-ranks-but-chose-to-end-his-career
back-in-a-field-office/2016/09/10/7f2caa32-7605-lle6-be4f-
i Are you F*CKING KIDDING ME. A) That's pretty much the OPPOSITE
of what was said yesterday. Kind of radically changes some of our
thinking. B) Isn't it OCA's job to talk to OLA?
Hey, let me know once you've read email. How substantively
does it change what we want to to? Maybe not, if we want to avoid
a fight on this.
Trisha is going to be SO mad. Not only did Andy ask HER to
reach out, but she even told Jason in an email to us that she had
already reached out, but hadn't heard back yet. _
But no, I don't think it changes anything.
he might work himself out of
contention. I'm glad that my 6th sense of dude, I don't know that
you know what you’re talking about/are wrong was working...
Always with that guy. He just desperately wants to be in charge, in
the know... ___ _
Talked with Bill
Everything. He sounded like he thought I had called him, though he
dialed me. Per haps he butt d ialed._
In any case, the week ahead. . He said Bowdich
and Mike S aren't happy with it. Prep for Jason. His concern that
we're throwing him up there, and the absence of an alternative.
INBOX
Prep for the D tomorrow.
OUTBOX
Have you been on eras to know whether anyone else edited Jason's
TPs?
INBOX
Stupid WH session
INBOX
Give me a sec. \n\nAnd yeah...but DID talk to DoJ \U0001f612
OUTBOX
What time is your meeting?
INBOX
1030-1200
87
DOJ-PROD-OOOCI253
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-12
OUTBOX
11:11:08, Mon
'
2016-09-12
11:25:13, Mon
INBOX
Npr says Trump hotel opens today. It doesn't look ready...
2016-09-12
11:26:16, Mon
OUTBOX
That's one place I hope 1 never stay in.
2016-09-12
11:29:23, Mon
INBOX
Agreed. Hope it fails horribly. It wont, but still.
2016-09-12
13:40:07, Mon
INBOX
Cyber blah blah blah. got comments back, so 1 think
Jason should be set
2016-09-12
13:40:42, Mon
OUTBOX
That's great.
2016-09-12
13:53:33, Mon
INBOX
Heard from SESU, pay raise waiver is at ODAG. I need to call Iris
anyway, do you have her #?
2016-09-12
13:54:48, Mon
OUTBOX
Iris is
2016-09-12
14:30:08, Mon
OUTBOX
Hey btw, make sure when dale /castor lose their minds be you
were asked to go, you identify jm as the person who tapped you,
not me.
2016-09-12
16:05:28, Mon
INBOX
Yep, 1 will
INBOX
Hmm. It’s paper only, that might work. Need to find Carl
2016-09-12
18:08:56, Mon
OUTBOX
JM is going to meet with him now I think, I’d walk down to him.
2016-09-12
18:15:09, Mon
INBOX
Good idea. Will try and drop in. In which case I'll be free at 4/4:30
\U0001f60a
2016-09-12
18:22:37, Mon
INBOX
Carl isn't there :{\n\nMtg upstairs till 3...
2016-09-12
21:09:53, Mon
INBOX
Chaffetz is horrible....
2016-09-12
21:13:37, Mon
INBOX
Expected blustering....
2016-09-12
21:13:53, Mon
OUTBOX
God, glad I'm not watching...
2016-09-12
21:47:49, Mon
INBOX
Omg Gowdy is being a total dick. All investigative questions. And
Jason isn't always sticking to the script on "I'm not answering that."
2016-09-12
21:47:53, Mon
INBOX
Horrible
2016-09-12
INBOX
This was a mistake
21:54:57,, Mon
2016-09-12 OUTBOX Oh no
21:59:48, Mon_
2016-09-12 UNBOX |Lis, it's bad.
22:00:28, Mon I _[_
88
DOJ-PROD-0000254
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-12
22:01:12, Mon
INBOX
They aren't asking Qs on the topic. And based on the Qs, he can't
defer. It's ALL posturing. He haven't done anything wrong. But we
look like sh*t
2016-09-12
22:17:11, Mon
INBOX
in here he's leaving in a sec
_
2016-09-12
22:33:17, Mon
INBOX
Hey. Who decided Jason would go up there?
2016-09-12
22:33:42, Mon
2016-09-12
22:33:47, Mon
OUTBOX
D. Rybicki.
OUTBOX
1 think.
Recessed for a vote. Back to more OPEN session at 730, followed
by closed session after that.
2016-09-12
22:41:07, Mon
INBOX
Call if you want to discuss
2016-09-12
22:41:36, Mon
INBOX
Is Rybicki in?
2016-09-12
22:43:11, Mon
OUTBOX
1 assume so.
2016-09-12
23:01:32, Mon
OUTBOX
Should have mentioned that rybicki screens. Next time leave a
msg.
2016-09-12
23:04:12, Mon
INBOX
Yeah well I'm not calling back.
2016-09-12
23:04:56, Mon
INBOX
They can drive mitigating this....
2016-09-12
23:09:06, Mon
INBOX
IMing with From him. "1 can't remember a worse open
hearing."
2016-09-12
23:09:34, Mon
OUTBOX
Moffa?
2016-09-12
23:09:48, Mon
INBOX
2016-09-12
23:10:05, Mon
OUTBOX
That is bad.
2016-09-12
23:10:16, Mon
INBOX
Yes, that bad. 1 told him 1 was sorry he confirmed it, 1 thought I
might not be objective due to how close 1 am
2016-09-12
23:10:17, Mon
OUTBOX
He needs to mention to andy.
2016-09-12
23:11:19, Mon
INBOX
Talk, briefly? Just want to read dialogue to you
2016-09-12
23:21:20, Mon
INBOX
"It was horrendous. It was so bad, 1 actually plan to go back and
watch the whole thing to be aware of it all."
2016-09-12
23:23:35, Mon
OUTBOX
said that?
2016-09-12
23:24:56, Mon
INBOX
Yes. Along with one other thing I’m not writing here
2016-09-12
23:30:57, Mon
OUTBOX
Oof. Imsg it?
89
DOJ-PROD-0000255
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-12
23:45:18, Mon
OUTBOX
Man, that is not good.
2016-09-12
23:45:44, Mon
INBOX
God I'm getting angry
2016-09-12
23:46:07, Mon
OUTBOX
You should stop watching. You can't do anything about it.
2016-09-12
23:46:32, Mon
OUTBOX
I'm frankly glad I'm not. I'm sick to my stomach and 1 haven't even
seen a minute of it.
2016-09-12
23:47:05, Mon
INBOX
I have to! We have to mitigate it!
2016-09-13
01:19:23, Tue
OUTBOX
should be here in about 15 minutes or so. Just fyi.
2016-09-13
01:32:37, Tue
INBOX
And I'm trying to get lunch with tomorrow, to talk about his
future.
2016-09-13
01:35:14, Tue
INBOX
Here you gk5\n\nFedera! Officials Testify FBI’s Investigation j
Video | C-SPAN.org\nhttps://www.c-span.org/video/?415070-
l/federal-officials-testify-fbis-investigation-hillary-ciinton
2016-09-13
11:52:32, Tue
INBOX
1 have Many Papers and Binders. Jesus too much to do. \U0001f614
2016-09-13
13:02:06, Tue
2016-09-13
13:02:16, Tue
INBOX
You in yet? Waiting to talk to Andy, you should meander down if it
get in in the next 15 or so.
INBOX
I'll of course fill you in later if you're not
2016-09-13
13:02:59, Tue
OUTBOX
I'm coming down to see andy now.
2016-09-13
14:53:26, Tue
OUTBOX
Is a b*tch.
2016-09-13
17:15:24, Tue
INBOX
and 1 both noticed (i didn't mention to you earlier) we both
want happy Friday Lisa back \U0001f614
2016-09-13
17:44:02, Tue
INBOX
and 1 got a TOTAL brush back from at lunch. Passed
without recognition, I even offered a "Hi "
2016-09-13
17:44:07, Tue
INBOX
And ok, 1 really want to hang out. You can come watch shoot. I'm
next to Carl g
2016-09-13
22:31:54, Tue
INBOX
Need to talk to you about mtg and email I'm sending
2016-09-13
22:32:38, Tue
OUTBOX
Can call you from the car
2016-09-13
22:38:19, Tue
INBOX
Call when you're out I'll give you an update on call and
calls, \n\nlf you want. \n\nWill both totally wait until tomorrow
2016-09-13
23:47:56, Tue
INBOX
Forgot to mention Andy this morning asked ogc to own subpoena
response, JB gave it to Browder
2016-09-13
23:54:35, Tue
OUTBOX
Copy.
2016-09-14
09:10:57, Wed
INBOX
1 cancelled my trip to mission ridge today. If you have time to talk
about the to D this afternoon 1 would
appreciate it
90
DOJ-PROD-OOOCI256
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-14
12:23:28, Wed
INBOX
Btw, talked with Bill at length about (in the context of
going through what's going on). In a way that didn't burn any
source, he said he hasn't had any coordination on this, that he
never discussed (or wants) giving anything up, and that if anything,
ITC efforts should be located within one Branch with CD and CYD
and SecD. Said Steinbach also thought the same. Though of course
he's out this week, all week.
2016-09-14
14:10:16, Wed
OUTBOX .
1 have the two pdbs that ran today if you want them.
2016-09-14
14:10:42, Wed
INBOX
1 do. Can 1 stop by?
2016-09-14
17:57:23, Wed
INBOX
Crap 1 just stepped out of really good nsa brief on
2016-09-14
17:57:43, Wed
OUTBOX
So go back in
2016-09-14
18:00:59, Wed
INBOX
No, not to just leave again early. \n\nAnd "maybe," above? Throw
me a bone.;)
2016-09-14
18:01:36, Wed
OUTBOX
in Andy's ofc.
2016-09-14
18:01:53, Wed
OUTBOX
Why don't you come in and talk intc?
2016-09-14
18:02:08, Wed
INBOX
Invite me...
2016-09-14 INBOX Outside with Castor
18:02:54, Wed __ _
2016-09-14 OUTBOX He is talking to right now.
18:03:13, Wed ____
2016-09-14 4NBOX Boo. Still standing;)
18:08:33, Wed ; ___
2016-09-14 INBOX Hi. You still here {hope not)? Supposed to meet Parmaan in 2...
22:29:2 5, Wed_
2016-09-14 OUTBOX No. Why mtg with paarman?
22:35:23, Wed_
2016-09-14
23:02:53, Wed
INBOX 1
With a Legat over an issue. I'll tell you tomorrow. May eventually
hit Andy. I'm sure you've heard of it. \n\nRemembered vaguely
more detail from mtg. Andy mentioned he was still hearing ("3 or 4
instances") recently that info was not flowing quickly enough and
more re Mike and Randy and his previous convo with them.
\n\nHappy to discuss now or tomorrow. 1 just had 10-11 open up...
2016-09-14
INBOX
23:28:34, Wed
1
2016-09-14
23:30:53, Wed
OUTBOX
So have bill call and tell him to knock it off.
91
DOJ-PROD-0000257
Strzok-PaEe Texts
2016-09-14
23:34:06, Wed
INBOX
1 already told him, then yelled at him about numbers in general,
then yelled about Snowden. Not yell, but professional angry. It was
very cathartic. 1 will invite you next time to sit at the chef's table
and watch
fii' Claims edva is (/was) the delay.
2016-09-15
00:47:41, Thu
INBOX
And 1 have no good, awful, sh*tty terrible (work) news. 1 can't say it
here, and you can't share with Andy (yet). I'm upset.
2016-09-15
01:10:06, Thu
OUTBOX
Can you share it on imsg?
2016-09-15
01:14:55, Thu
INBOX
Yes just sent
2016-09-15
16:14:49, Thu
INBOX
GREAT convo with JR, let me know when you're back....
Sincerely good?
2016-09-15
16:16:28, Thu
INBOX
But want to get your thoughts on how he might play it/spin....
2016-09-15
16:28:03, Thu
INBOX
Have a 1230 with Bill to prep him for Andy, then 1 staff meeting.
2016-09-15
22:49:28, Thu
INBOX
2016-09-15
23:11:21, Thu
INBOX
2016-09-15
23:11:56, Thu
INBOX
Also, Bill did not tell Andy about the loss. Background reasons why,
which make sense. 1 can fill you in on imessage later if you want.
2016-09-16
00:39:25, Fri
OUTBOX
Yeah really. No photos in fbi space.
2016-09-16
02:59:17, Fri
INBOX
Does Andy know he hurt Jim the other day with the "I don't have
time for this"?\n\nl think that was the purpose of his look down
the table. "See? You're right."
2016-09-16
03:00:03, Fri
OUTBOX
1 don't know. 1 plan to tell him, just haven't had the opportunity.
2016-09-16
03:03:28, Fri
INBOX
Re , he knows he was a dick. Don't know if Jim picked up on
his acknowledgement of it.
2016-09-16
18:15:13, Fri
OUTBOX
In ofc.
2016-09-18
13:17:32, Sun
INBOX
Thanks for adding Jon and me into that email chain. 1 think 1 added
you on some of that correspondence on Friday, right (re Datto)?
2016-09-18
14:53:01, Sun
OUTBOX
BBC is saying that bombs in NY were CT. Sucks.
2016-09-18
14:55:32, Sun
INBOX
92
DOJ-PROD-0000258
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-18
14:55:52, Sun
INBOX
If it's a different thing, they're busy right now.
2016-09-19
10:35:02, Mon
INBOX
Hi. Not sure I'm up for this job. Up past midnight worrying about
the thing 1 told you about on Saturday morning. There's always
going to be something to worry about. And I'm not able to turn it
off right now.
2016-09-19
10:51:58. Mon
OUTBOX
Hi. I'm sorry. We can control that part, 1 would try not to worry
about it.
2016-09-19
11:08:09, Mon
INBOX
Sorry got up super late and scrambling. 1 hope so, re work thing. It
really bothers me. My general upset has settled into
disappointment at putting Bill in a bad spot and anger at the others
for having tried to do the right thing for the right reasons.
2016-09-19
11:09:46, Mon
OUTBOX
You didn't put Bill in a bad spot. You've done exactly what he's
wanted you to do.
2016-09-19
12:03:13, Mon
INBOX
See, this is the crap that aggravates me: 1 specifically DIDN'T tell Bill
about the new Intel we got on Fri on so that could present
it. Then _ uns in this morning and does it without me.
Whatever....
2016-09-19
12:25:19, Mon
OUTBOX
1 know. But you have a LOT more access to bill than he does. It's
not that important. He's feeling insecure. Let it go...
2016-09-19
12:26:57, Mon
INBOX
Hmmm. Sure, but. We've got a good working relationship because
stuff like this doesn't happen. I'll say something, nicely.
2016-09-19
12:31:32, Mon
OUTBOX
Okay. \n\nAnd yes, Thursday works. I told Jim that and 1 are
going to have a talk with Andy, asked if 1 could talk to him about it
first.
2016-09-19
12:37:42, Mon
OUTBOX
And re , 1 still think 1 disagree. It would be one thing if he told
Bill first. But why do you actually NEED to be there?
2016-09-19
12:59:27, Mon
INBOX
2016-09-19 INBOX
13:02:37, Mon
2016-09-19 OUTBOX
13:28:06, Mon
IB) inasmuch as walked out of meeting him and said to me, hey
you need to talk to Bill about operational next steps on the guy,
yes. Look, it's really not a big deal. For all i know Bill called him
down. And there's a ton going on.\n\nA) good idea. I'm still
thinking in should talk to JB about the issues {both our
i organizational one as well as the dynamic Andy may be creating
without realizing it).\n
A) and then part of me thinks, this is the point. DADs should not be
having lunch with the GC. Let the process work and keep my head
down. _
Is there something going on around hq? Traffic is at a stand still.
OUTBOX
Something going on down 9th. No cars, no pedestrians, even with
badge.
OUTBOX
Suspicious package, my fbi ofcr just told me.
93
DOJ-PROD-0000259
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-19 OUTBOX SSCI member brief tomorrow by cyd. You aware?
13:58:24, Mon
2016-09-19
14:02:54, Mon
INBOX
1 think so...members, though? \n\nAlso, walking up
2016-09-20
00:02:26, Tue
OUTBOX
Forgot to mention that DD asked about what was
calling about. We should discuss tomorrow
2016-09-20
00:07:42, Tue .
INBOX
Wasn't our stuff. 1 have details. Shockingly not a flaming turd bag.
More precisely, not one of the flaming turd bags of interest to us
now. \n\nJust leaving. Bill wanted to talk. ...\n\nTtyl
2016-09-20
INBOX
\n\nWork
10:15:04, Tue
Q: were you there for discussion of SSCI appearance today?
did prep and is scheduled to go with Eric. Bill wants me to go - I'm
not sure if it's necessary, particularly given what session was
supposed to focus on. Think it would be better for him to go and
defer answering stuff not on point of the briefing. Bill said Andy
said no but that was it.
2016-09-20
10:15:39, Tue
INBOX
Did Jason say anything about the expected topics? \n\nAnd why
are we doing this the DAY before the D goes up?
2016-09-20
OUTBOX
Vn\nYes, 1 was.
10:26:04, Tue
We're doing it be it was already on the calendar. Multiagency.
Nothing about expected topics, just the overall topic.
2016-09-20
10:27:22, Tue
OUTBOX
You going not a bad idea, though the goal is to try to defer a lot of
it to the D tomorrow.
2016-09-20
10:38:56, Tue
INBOX
Right. And already prepped for the other stuff, him not
knowing other stuff may help. We are already taking two, out of a
three agency panel. 1 would need to bump him to go. I'll talk to Bill -
think it might be smarter to brief him up on what not to say/red
lines rather than me learn stuff...
2016-09-20
10:40:53, Tue
INBOX
Plus I'm supposed to talk to Glenn Fine at 145 with Baker...
2016-09-20
11:11:19, Tue
INBOX
Fla. 1 just pulled into work. Talk to Bill quickly, send an email to 4 to
remind them-about TPs on then off to
2016-09-20
11:19:10, Tue
OUTBOX
Did you tell Bill why?
2016-09-20
11:19:52, Tue
OUTBOX
What ever came of keeping Dn?
2016-09-20
11:40:35, Tue
INBOX
A) nopel \U0001f60a\nB) 1 have no idea. 1 made the request to
and Trisha. Not sure where it went, I'll ask. Neither were
opposed in principle.
2016-09-20
11:42:04, Tue
INBOX
And while 1 hate it, i kinda want to walk over
to the old post office and see what they've done with it. Want to
go with me?
2016-09-20
INBOX
11:42:33, Tue
94
DOJ-PROD-0000260
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-20
11:42:35, Tile
OUTBOX
The new Trump hotel? No.
2016-09-20
11:42:49, Tue
OUTBOX
You've looked?
2016-09-20
11:44:00, Tue
INBOX
No, only some review online.
2016-09-20
11:44:55, Tue
INBOX
A) i didn't say anything. We don't have a scheduling conflict - he's
upstairs...
2016-09-20
11:49:20, Tue
INBOX
I'll just move my 830 with SCs every Tuesday.
2016-09-20
16:41:43, Tue
INBOX
Omg omg omg you would not believe what CYD just proposed to
put in our update for you.\n\nHope lunch is going well. Kinda
reallv can’t wait to hear. \U0001f60a
2016-09-20
16:45:50, Tue
INBOX
And may 1 please preposition a notebook in your office (and drop
stuff after firearms)? Need to go straight to a mtg with Baker
2016-09-20
16:55:47, Tue
INBOX
Disregard dropoff, 1 have all my stuff here. 1 would like use your
office to drop stuff on the way to JB's, if I may.:)
2016-09-20
19:34:41, Tue
INBOX
You with Jason? Just saw mtg invite for 3-330. I'm going to stop by
now
2016-09-20
20:18:36, Tue
INBOX
You rock\u263a
2016-09-20
21:17:55, Tue
INBOX
Because you send quick tips like Andy wanting a brief tomorrow
m orni
2016-09-20
21:17:56, Tue
INBOX
Doj gave the letter back to you and Trisha for Jim/Andy's approval,
right?
2016-09-20
21:24:16, Tue
INBOX
And if 1 get done in time need to tell you about convo with JR on
prep tomorrow as well as feedback from today
2016-09-20
OUTBOX
Not Andy, the D. But thanks.
21:30:42, Tue
2016-09-20
22:28:11, Tue
INBOX
Thanks. Still salty from even Bills reaction subsequent to talking to
you. Will explain. \n\nBut thank you. Deeply.
2016-09-20
23:46:07, Tue
INBOX
Good talk with Bill
2016-09-20
23:46:49, Tue
INBOX
Got much more info, which I'll share. One will irritate you (not
about you, about Andy)
2016-09-21
00:21:15, Wed
INBOX
Well.he made the right damn decision. \U0001f636\n\nAnd I’m
sorry, emails.
2016-09-21
00:23:39, Wed
INBOX
Sorry. "As quickly as possible."
2016-09-21
00:27:06, Wed
OUTBOX
1 know. 1 loved response, will print for signature. \U0001f612
2016-09-21
00:28:33, Wed
INBOX
1 didn't take that as a joke or a comeback. Did you?
95
DOJ-PROD-0000261
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-21
00:28:50, Wed
OUTBOX
No, just true.
2016-09-21
00:31:27, Wed
OUTBOX
And god, that makes me angry, what you told me. I think it would
make the D ripsh*t. That's exactly the opposite of what he is trying
to foster.
2016-09-21
00:32:22, Wed
INBOX
It's deeply angering
2016-09-21
00:32:32, Wed
OUTBOX
1 hope we have the last laugh...
2016-09-21
00:33:06, Wed
INBOX
Let me stifle alternative, competent opinion by threatening future
retaliation
2016-09-21
00:33:12, Wed
OUTBOX
Andy knows the There is no one more perceptive
than the D, he surely does as well.
2016-09-21
00:33:56, Wed
INBOX
Maybe this is all something 1 should talk to Baker. But that would
really be breaking the code with both of the two who said it. And
would be unforgivable to them
2016-09-21
00:34:07, Wed
OUTBOX
Exactly. That is why bill needs to go get a cup of coffee or a drink
with Andy, frame it in terms of protection of Andy, he needs to
know what is being said behind his back.
2016-09-21
00:34:40, Wed
OUTBOX
1 think telling baker is quite wise. He already knows what 1 think of
He agrees.
2016-09-21
00:34:46, Wed
INBOX
The other thing that Bill said that 1 thought was interesting was
considered what these people will say not only in the bureau, but
they might also say in the post Bureau Business world
2016-09-21
00:35:08, Wed
INBOX
I'd have to wait to tell Jim. It's too close on the heels of you talking
to him
2016-09-21
00:35:33, Wed
OUTBOX
Worse case scenario, you just have to be prepared for this to be
your last job in the bu. Though 1 db think that is unlikely.
2016-09-21
00:35:55, Wed
OUTBOX
Just wait a couple of days. Ask to meet soon.
2016-09-21
00:36:47, Wed
INBOX
Okama 1 definitely definitely need to get out as sac before Andy
goes
2016-09-21
00:36:51, Wed
INBOX
I'd work for you
2016-09-21
00:38:09, Wed
OUTBOX
So we've got 18 months to make that happen.
2016-09-21
15:58:48, Wed
INBOX
Hi. Bill and Jon re-did essentially what you and 1 did earlier for
Mike. \U0001f612 At least we gave the same answer \n\nl find I'm
really miserable. Not asking you to do anything. Kind of moping.
Thanks for vour patience.
2016-09-21
16:01:36, Wed
OUTBOX
Re-did what?
2016-09-21
16:06:09, Wed
INBOX
Go through D and DD's insa comments and said, here are the limits
of what's been said (which is essentially nothing )\n\nl'm positive
neww, NSC called out FBI positively in the SVTC. Yay us.
96
DOJ-PROD-0000262
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-21
22:31:26, Wed
2016-09-21
22:41:44. Wed
2016-09-21
23:23:59, Wed
2016-09-21
23:29:06, Wed
INBOX
INBOX
You still here? Got background on the but have t0
go back into wrap. These are going to KILL me. _ _
We can talk about it tomorrow. It is not urgent. Also, will
need the info too. _
Great. Just had to tell a very angry that Bill was
posting 3 (which means won't be returning there - he's
currently I don't enjoy this part of the job.
\U0001f615 _
Not going well tonight? I get the sadness and frustration, and the
feeling of not doing what you'd want, but I honestly think you're
too hard on yourself. I'm sorry\n\nYeah it really sucked. At least Bill
did me the solid of not asking me, just called me and Dina in and
said. I’ve told them to post 3...essentially telling a SC the Div does
not have confidence in him to run the program.
2016-09-21
23:38:40, Wed
INBOX
2016-09-21
23:46:25, Wed
OUTBOX
2016-09-21
23:47:31, Wed
INBOX
2016-09-21
23:49:42, Wed
OUTBOX
2016-09-21
23:51:18, Wed
INBOX
2016-09-22
00:14:59, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-09-22
00:17:12, Thu
INBOX
2016-09-22
00:19:49, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-09-22
INBOX
11:49:59, Thu
2016-09-22 OUTBOX
11:51:06, T hu !
2016-09-22 ’ | INBOX
11:52:17, Thu i
^n\nUnrelated,
your thing tomorrow afternoon is Hill, not WH, right? if so, and
open (I think you or said it was), you should tell your Mom and
Dad to watch CSpan.,.._
Not open, closed, member only.
Oh. WAH wah
Yeah, it's really fine.
Ha. I'm sure it is. \n\nSpeaking of, forgot to follow up on whatever
sumo silliness relayed,..convo for lunch tomorrow
Not really important. Just didn't want to make an inquiry of me
about whether i attended some standing mtg, specifically told .
he wanted to go through me.
No - it was something about taping (himself?)’
Two Ex-Spies and Donald Trump http://nyti.ms/2cYynG6
Having second thoughts about
Not sure what the other
options are, though. \n\nAnyway, would like to bounce around
with you _
More than A spy around every corner? I'm not sure about that,
but yes, we can chat. _ _
But much better asc and UCs in ..Def let's chat
97
DOJ-PROD-0000263
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-22
11:53:24, Thu
INBOX
Different topic, you don't think 1 should talk to Castor first, or both
of them, or schedule a mtg rather than drop in?
2016-09-22
11:55:56, Thu
OUTBOX
No, 1 wouldn't worry about castor. Schedule, maybe. Let's think
about that.
2016-09-22
11:59:25, Thu
INBOX
Clear through Bill then a short email, sir, do you have 15 minutes?
2016-09-22
12:01:47, Thu
INBOX
The "drop in" seems to contrived and too great a chance that some
random person would be in there....
2016-09-22
12:03:26, Thu
INBOX
2016-09-22
OUTBOX
12:15:28, Thu
2016-09-22
15:55:32, Thu
OUTBOX
I'm thinking about saying something to Eric first, what do you
think?
2016-09-22
15:56:35, Thu
OUTBOX
Do it in the context of, look, this puss andy off, but 1 don't need a
secretary second guessing something 1 say, and certainly, not
second guessing me in front of the division. If she is that
concerned, let her ask andv.
2016-09-22 OUTBOX
15:57:06, Thu_
2016-09-22 INBOX
16:45:14, Thu _
2016-09-22 INBOX '
16:46:13, Thu
2016-09-22 INBOX
16:54:33, Thu
2016-09-22 OUTBOX
17:33:09, Thu I
2016-09-22 INBOX
18:48:38, Thu
2016-09-22
18:49:08, Thu
2016-09-22
18:50:23, Thu
2016-09-22
18:50:32, Thu
2016-09-22
18:51:03, Thu
OUTBOX
outbox"
INBOX
OUTBOX
*this will piss andy off.
|l think that's smart. How do explain that you know that she did it?
i Any thought going direct with I don't think that's a good
idea. ______ _
;And God, I haven't stopped, with no end in sight. I know you're the
same. \n
I'm just going to make reference to her going to a division to
question my judgment. If he asks I'll say CD, but there are plenty of
people I could have heard it from. I'm friends with lots of people on
1 that division. _
3-4, right? I know you're excited. \U0001f60a\n\nBtw, afternoon D
session invites didn’t go. What time, so Jon and I can block?
No clue. hasn't sent it yet. God I hate her.
Email says 3:30-4:30, but those times can be a little flex.
Hey, also note that when responded to her, he also cc:ed me
and Jon, then responded "thanks" to all of us. _
Yup, I know. That's my point, it could be you, jon, bill
98
DOJ-PROD-OOOCI264
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-22
18:52:47, Thu
INBOX
Got it, thanks \n\nl'm all good for you to use me as source of email,
just gotta have a logical answer. "Pete sent the email asking me
what the D expected/wanted'' 1 think would make sense. If it even
comes d
2016-09-22
18:54:21, Thu
INBOX
While 1 hate Congress, there's something about all of it together at
once. \n\nCurious how many actually show....\n\nCivics nerds, we
are
2016-09-22
20:40:47, Thu
INBOX
I'm covering wrap with EAD for Bill....
2016-09-22
20:47:11, Thu
OUTBOX
We are just leaving the Hill now. 1 expect it will be a late night.
2016-09-22
22:10:30, Thu
INBOX
(asking because talking to Bill, 1 can easily break away, though)
2016-09-22
22:16:58, Thu
OUTBOX
I am. Might try to sit on a 6:30 call with andy though.
2016-09-22
22:18:47, Thu
INBOX
Talking with Sporre now about your call....
2016-09-22
22:19:16, Thu
OUTBOX
My call? I met with him.
2016-09-22
22:42:47, Thu
INBOX
No. Your upcoming call with
2016-09-23
11:30:17, Fri
OUTBOX
You are not going to leave your all hands early. You are a DAD.
2016-09-23
11:30:29, Fri
INBOX
And just sent the cyber/cd D invite...
2016-09-23
11:30:30, Fri
OUTBOX
Probably 45 or so. We'll see.
2016-09-23
11:31:02, Fri
OUTBOX
Not to me yet. Am I on there?
2016-09-23
INBOX
11:31:08, Fri
2016-09-23
11:31:37, Fri
OUTBOX
^■
2016-09-23
11:31:42, Fri
INBOX
No....\n\nAnd head explodes in 3...2...1
2016-09-23 ! OUTBOX
11:31:59, Fri
Jesus. \U0001f621
2016-09-23 OUTBOX
11:32:17, Fri
1 am simply going to send another f-ing email, cc Eric. AGAIN.
2016-09-23 OUTBOX
She fix the mye one?
11:32:24, Fri
2016-09-23
11:32:39, Fri
INBOX
Want me to forward to you? \U0001f61c
2016-09-23
11:33:05, Fri
OUTBOX
No, she can see that.
2016-09-23
11:37:07, Fri
OUTBOX
So I'm going to forward the original email, and write, "Hi
Thanks for updating the CD/CyD meeting. Could you please add me
as well?" Nothing wrong with that right?
99
DOJ-PROD-0000265
Str7nk-Papp Tpyt<:
2016-09-23
12:14:44, Fri
INBOX
Hey they picked 2 SACs for NY yesterday. Let me know if you hear
name...Mike said something that made me hopeful
2016-09-23
13:14:57, Fri
OUTBOX
I'm almost there.
2016-09-23
13:15:08, Fri
OUTBOX
Though I forgot the paper. \U0001f612
2016-09-23
14:33:43, Fri
INBOX
Hey let's find 30 min to tweak editorial and add voter stuff. You ok
if 1 hit Rybicki for latest version?
2016-09-23
15:49:40, Fri
OUTBOX
1 did not go. Let go. I'm furious at again.
2016-09-23
15:55:23, Fri
OUTBOX
I'm waiting for Jim B. I'll be done noon.
2016-09-23
15:56:03, Fri
INBOX
What'd she do? Other than be crappy?
2016-09-23
16:00:32, Fri
INBOX
Hey heads up im in your office
2016-09-23
16:47:02, Fri
INBOX
Ridiculous, right? I'm waiting to see if called to ask him, cam
you just send Pete?
2016-09-23
16:57:44, Fri
OUTBOX
Yes, please find out.
2016-09-23
21:02:41, Fri
INBOX
You still around? Would like to talk to you before leaving.
2016-09-23
21:06:26, Fri
OUTBOX
Yuo
2016-09-23
21:14:02, Fri
OUTBOX
Headed to my seif. Just knock there
2016-09-24
00:47:18, Sat
INBOX
Don't feel like crying. He was a dick. And if he's an SES, and about
to be an SAC, he needs more maturity and consideration
2016-09-24
00:49:42, Sat
OUTBOX
I do. Fighting tears at the table.
2016-09-24
00:49:49, Sat
OUTBOX
I’m not happy.
2016-09-24
00:50:34, Sat
INBOX
1 know. 1 want to go confront him. That would not end well for any
of us (him, me, you) on a number of levels.
2016-09-24
00:51:33, Sat
INBOX
Best I can tell you us try and see his offering an insight into his
admission of his own weakness and insecurity and try and take that
in the best possible light.
2016-09-24
18:06:40, Sat
INBOX
Hey. Work Q. CyD is doing some big thing for the D still. Do you
think we'd be ok giving separate products to him? Ours is (good
and concise and) done, I want to avoid our guys having to come in
tomorrow to fight through editing a joint product.
2016-09-24
18:07:45, Sat
2016-09-24
19:21:55, Sat
lINBOX
Disregard. We're going to send them what we've got and let them
incorporat e it into the irs._
OUTBOX
I_
D's PC is from 11:30-1, so yeah, it's going to have to be right first
thing Monday. _
100
DOJ-PROD-0000266
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-24
19:24:35, Sat
INBOX
Work talk quickly?
2016-09-24
20:00:25, Sat
INBOX
iA/hat did he think? Have you come to any ideas about how
you'd like to address some of the work stuff?
2016-09-24
20:03:37, Sat
OUTBOX
No. Just that 1 need to find my The conversation was mostly
about he and 1, work anc
But at least he knows how 1 feel about a whole mix of
things now.
2016-09-24
20:50:27, Sat
INBOX
And
\U0001f621\U0001f621\U0001f621\U0001f621\U0001f621\UOOO
lf621 eras just disconnected and 1 lost the mye prep email 1 was
writing.
2016-09-24
20:58:08, Sat
INBOX
Whew. Was able to recover it, and just sent
2016-09-24
22:21:21, Sat
INBOX
The Mystery of Trump\u2019s Man in Moscow - POLITICO
Magazine\nhttp://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/the
mvste rv-of-trum ps-m a n-in-m oscow-214283
2016-09-25
20:49:05, Sun
INBOX
Walking to the office, see what CYD put together...not holding my
breath
2016-09-25
20:58:54, Sun
INBOX
\n\nOf course, cyber sent everyone home
without sending the doc to review. AFTER specifically asking us to
come in today to chop....\n\nl AM SO MAD
2016-09-25
21:02:56, Sun
OUTBOX
You should call spore right f-ing now.
2016-09-25
21:04:46, Sun
INBOX
Talking to him now. They're on the S side, with less detail.
2016-09-25
21:22:22, Sun
INBOX
Well, it's not bad. They feel compelled to add/adjust things in our
section, which is irritating (much more so to Jon than me).
\U0001f612 But we should have something tonight. \n\nFinally, it's
A PAGE AND A HALF. Jon and 1 were laughing the two of us could
orobablv do that in 40 minutes...
2016-09-26
00:21:27, Mon
OUTBOX
Note the BCC. I'm inclined to say no.
2016-09-26
00:36:38, Mon
INBOX
And def i would not send our (CD) stuff. 1 got the impression from
Andy there was some question if the D would want to use the
info in the PC. \n\nl need to make sure CYD knows not to
send it far and wide. 1 can see them messing that up.\n\nAnd if the
background - that the community is saying it's all our fault and
waiting on us, 1 wouldn't want to play into that in unexpected
wavs.
2016-09-26
00:45:59, Mon
OUTBOX
1 would email sporre tonight so that he knows to limit distribution.
101
DOJ-PROD-0000267
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-26
00:48:25, Mon
INBOX
2016-09-26
00:48:52, Mon
INBOX
Re Sporre, 1 did.
2016-09-26
00:49:12, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-09-26
00:50:16, Mon
INBOX
2016-09-26
00:50:40, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-09-26
12:44:13, Mon
OUTBOX
1 know 1 need to watch it, but I’m not sure 1 have the stomach for
the debate tonight.
2016-09-26
12:50:44, Mon
OUTBOX
Turns out 1 don't want to go to work. Apparently it's the biggest
source of mv issues.
2016-09-26
INBOX
1 don't want to watch the debate either, but 1 will
12:52:43, Mon
2016-09-26
12:53:41, Mon
INBOX
And re work issues, did you decide what, if anything, you want to
do with and Eric?
2016-09-26
12:54:01, Mon
INBOX
Eric getting a job will help...but who knows how long that will be
2016-09-26
12:55:25, Mon
INBOX
I’m busy responding to work emails from the week of Aug 15th that
got stuck unread. Yep, it's pretty pathetic to say thanks for the job
congratulations a MONTH after the fact
2016-09-26
12:56:11, Mon
INBOX
1 agree with you, but not following "no one is going to do it for me"
you mean make you prioritize them?
im
OUTBOX
Could you bring up that CD/CyD doc?
INBOX
Just rode the elevator down with Andy, had a nice convo. He went
thru some of the stuff you shared earlier. \U0001f60a
2016-09-26
23:46:24, Mon
OUTBOX
Work stuff?
2016-09-27
00:33:25, Tue
OUTBOX
Did you read this? It's scathing. And I'm scared.\n\nWhy Donald
Trump Should Not Be President http://nyti.ms/2dbQPuR
2016-09-27
00:40:43, Tue
OUTBOX
Man, 1 should have started drinking earlier. I'm genuinely stressed
about the debate.
2016-09-27
01:06:47, Tue
OUTBOX
Oh god, she's already boring.
2016-09-27
01:08:20, Tue
INBOX
1 know. 100% produced. And 1 REALLY don't think she’s that bad.
She just can't escape the formula....
2016-09-27
01:10:33, Tue
OUTBOX
She can't. Can you imsg instead?
2016-09-27
01:11:09, Tue
OUTBOX
Btw, is he a gtown grad? No way...
102
DOJ-PROD-0000268
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-27
INBOX
B)
01:12:40, Tue
masters degree. He told me after some briefing where D and Jon
made one of their Gtwn - William and Mary riffs....
2016-09-27
01:13:49, Tue
OUTBOX
Wow, really? Masters in what?
2016-09-27
09:50:46, Tue
INBOX
Hi. 1 don't know.
2016-09-27
10:37:52, Tue
INBOX
Can I ask you a question about yesterday's discussion? Why rule
out a job at DoJ. Not NSD or ODAG?
2016-09-27
10:38:13, Tue
INBOX
Too political?
2016-09-27
10:39:43, Tue
OUTBOX
No way. 1 don't see what 1 get out of that, and I'd have to deal with
all the political BS.
2016-09-27
10:40:32, Tue
INBOX
Political connections. Better entree into other jobs? Maybe not the
latter.
2016-09-27
11:44:15, Tue
INBOX
Nprjust mentioned jeh appearing before Congress today. No
mention of the FBI.
2016-09-27
OUTBOX
Jeh? Hoover risen from the dead?
11:48:48, Tue
2016-09-27
11:49:01, Tue
OUTBOX
Oh. Jeh Johnson. Right.
2016-09-27
11:49:27, Tue
OUTBOX
Honestly, that's good. The less people ask of us the better. 1 need a
tv in my office. \U0001f621
2016-09-27
13:26:49, Tue
INBOX
Just seeing if 1 could reach you. Bill having Thoughts about the PC
yesterday\n\nAlso per agency they may have them every Mon.
2016-09-27
13:29:08, Tue
INBOX
K.\n\nGet the intel report! :)\n\nAbout to talk with Scott. But that
should be a shirt meeting
2016-09-27
13:29:09, Tue
INBOX
Short meeting. Not shirt meeting. We both have shirts.
2016-09-27
13:36:32. Tue
OUTBOX
Going to go see moffa now. With report.;)
2016-09-27
13:37:10, Tue
INBOX
Irritatingly, 1 am waiting on Scott for an SSA who went in at 955 for
"a quick 5 minutes" \U0001f612
2016-09-27
14:52:35, Tue
OUTBOX
I'm watching the D. He is so impressive.
2016-09-27
17:35:02, Tue
INBOX
You nearby? In your office
2016-09-27
17:37:36, Tue
OUTBOX
No. Down with andy. May not be back
2016-09-27
INBOX
Hi! I'm jealous about your Hill trip (again)
19:50:27, Tue
;
2016-09-27
20:43:45, Tue
OUTBOX
Today's was more contentious, but more cool, because 1 recognize
most of them.
2016-09-27
20:59:27, Tue
INBOX
Doing Judiciary prep with Rybicki think I’ll be done before you
103
DOJ-PROD-0000269
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-27
21:25:02, Tue
INBOX
Hi. And the prep was with Rybicki AND the D. 1 like my job
sometimes.
2016-09-27
21:25:29, Tue
INBOX
Call my desk when you’re done, 1 may need an assist shooing
someone off
2016-09-27
21:34:50, Tue
INBOX
Never mind, he left. Just hit me here when you're done. You can
tell me Senate stories \U0001f60a
2016-09-27
22:06:11, Tue
INBOX
Hey you done? Bill's been back, trying to avoid getting pulled into a
convo.J may go hide somewhere \U0001f636
2016-09-27
22:12:21, Tue
OUTBOX
Done now
2016-09-27
23:52:02, Tue
INBOX
i
Sheesh. Just leaving. Talked to you can't tell him yet
you know that), you lawyers sure can talk;)
2016-09-27
23:59:53, Tue
OUTBOX
NO ONE talks more than He talk to you about ?
2016-09-28
INBOX
No this is about thing Baker got a call on. What's
00:02:23, Wed :
535B5CE1
INBOX
Ah. No. 1 didn't mention. And I've got to follow up with Bill on that
following our conversation.
2016-09-28
00:08:27, Wed
INBOX
1
.
Anyway, have a 10 o'clock link call with him and You
should get the deputy to assign you so you can come play with us.
;)\n\nHonest!y, it doesn't need the deputies office involved, but 1
know we're all cool, and you like the cool kids \U0001f60a
2016-09-28
00:12:50, Wed
OUTBOX
1 DO want to be part of that call! \U0001f60a
2016-09-28
10:45:25, Wed
INBOX
1 know! That’s why I'm admonishing you.\n\nOh - remind me to
tell you what Bill said about Eric last night. You haven't talked to
him about him, have you?
2016-09-28
11:09:45, Wed
OUTBOX
I haven't talked to whom? Bill? Eric? Answer is no to both.
2016-09-28
11:16:02, Wed
INBOX
Ha. Ok. You won't be surprised. \U0001f612 Not about you.
2016-09-28
13:13:08, Wed
1 OUTBOX
Goodlatte opened with the mye stuff
2016-09-28
13:14:36, Wed
INBOX
Today? Is it on now?
2016-09-28
13:14:52, Wed
OUTBOX
Yes. Started at 9.
2016-09-28
13:15:09, Wed
OUTBOX
I’m in the D's conference roo. Watching with rybicki et al
2016-09-28
13:16:48, Wed
INBOX
Oh. Boo. 1 was going to stop by...\n\nHow's he doing?
2016-09-28
13:17:36, Wed
INBOX
Who was the npr interview?
2016-09-28
13:17:45, Wed
OUTBOX
Just member opening remarks
2016-09-28
13:17:59, Wed
OUTBOX
I'm not sure 1 am going to be able to stomach all of this.
104
DOJ-PROD-0000270
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-28
13:18:18, Wed
OUTBOX
1 I'm not telling re npr! 1 want to listen together. \U0001f636
2016-09-28
13:18:52, Wed
OUTBOX
We're watching online.
201G-09-28
13:19:01, Wed 1
INBOX
1 don't have it on CSpan 1 2 or 3
2016-09-28
13:19:07, Wed
INBOX
CSpan?
2016-09-28
13:19:21, Wed
OUTBOX
I'm sure, yes. Are you free? Come up?
2016-09-28
13:19:45, Wed
INBOX
Ok with everyone there?
2016-09-28
13:19:58, Wed
INBOX
Until 10...
2016-09-28
13:20:39, Wed
INBOX
Oh re npr\U0001f636
2016-09-28
INBOX
13:41:53, Wed
And I'm so f*cking proud that we nailed all
these Qs in advance of the prep \u263a
2016-09-28
14:57:21, Wed
INBOX
1 can miss my 130 no problem
(frankly, a SC - level meeting, but need to be here by 2
2016-09-28
14:58:45, Wed
UNBOX
Np. Iris and
2016-09-28
15:13:33, Wed
OUTBOX
Trisha needs to talk at 1. What time is your 2:00 meeting over?
2016-09-28
15:18:20, Wed
INBOX
B\xf6\xf4\xf5\n\n230. Gotta be back at 345.\n\nWhat are you
doing for lunch.
2016-09-28
15:21:19, Wed
INBOX
Still talking midyear?
2016-09-28
15:21:32, Wed
1 worry the appearance to JR and
2016-09-28
You think OK?
15:21:40, Wed
2016-09-28
15:21:41, Wed
OUTBOX
Yup. Gowdy now.
2016-09-28
15:21:56, Wed
OUTBOX
Yup. Why not. Kortan here too.
2016-09-28
16:06:16, Wed
OUTBOX
I know. Me too. 1 have to meet with Trisha at 1. Maybe eat after
that?
2016-09-28
16:07:18, Wed
INBOX
Sure if there's time before my 2. Trisha meeting brief?
2016-09-28
16:13:03, Wed
INBOX
sending me emails about the number of people in the
room. \U0001f612 Yes, 1 was there. \n\nHas D said anything about
#s of people in the interview?
2016-09-28
16:15:20, Wed
INBOX
You need help? 1 can step out in a few...
105
DOJ-PROD-0000271
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-28
16:17:54, Wed
INBOX
Your sacs badge is in here ..
2016-09-28
19:07:56, Wed
INBOX
Cyber fucked everything up with Iris and 1 have calls in to
both
2016-09-28
19:10:07, Wed
OUTBOX
1
You are kidding me. \U0001f621 How so?
2016-09-28
19:28:47, Wed
OUTBOX
Hey, just called you back.
2016-09-28
19:31:36, Wed
INBOX
Sorry talking to Iris, calling 3:30. Which 1 guess was 2 minutes
ago.
2016-09-28
21:28:23, Wed
INBOX
i
Sorry. A lot of people want a lot of time. Not all of them need it.
Didn't gatekeep for Andy as EAD, or was it better at that level?
Can't imagine it would be
2016-09-28
21:28:54, Wed
OUTBOX
No, he had to do that for him.
2016-09-28
21:28:56, Wed
■INBOX
2016-09-28
21:29:12, Wed
OUTBOX
2016-09-28
23:25:31, Wed
INBOX
Got called up to Andy's earlier...hundreds of thousands of emails
turned over by Weiner's atty to sdny, includes a ton of material
from spouse. \U0001f628\n\nSending team up tomorrow to
review...this will never end....
2016-09-28
23:27:03, Wed
| OUTBOX
Turned over to them why?
2016-09-28
23:28:24, Wed
INBOX j
Apparently one of his recent texting partners may not have been
18...don't have the details yet
106
DOJ-PROD-OOOCI272
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-29
01:14:28, Thu
2016-09-29
01:15:53, Thu
2016-09-29
01:18:16, Thu
2016-09-29
01:18:29, Thu
2016-09-29
01:19:06, Thu
2016-09-29
01:50:27, Thu
2016-09-29
01:53:27, Thu
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
Please don’t. I really don't want to know what is out there.
2016-09-29
14:08:10, Thu
INBOX
2016-09-29
14:08:29, Thu
INBOX
2016-09-29
21:17:11, Thu
INBOX
2016-09-29
23:46:34, Thu
INBOX
2016-09-29
23:46:58, Thu i
INBOX
2016-09-29
23:49:58, Thu
INBOX
2016-09-30
01:42:15, Fri
INBOX
2016-09-30
11:16:33, Fri
INBOX
2016-09-30
11:31:00, Fri
OUTBOX
Republicans Just Cannot Let The Clinton Emails Go | Huffington
Post\nhttp://m. huffpost.com/us/entry/us_57ecl965e4b082aad9b
8c728
"Found it hard to focus"?\n\n"Found it hard to
focus"?!?!??!\n\nAre you Peking kidding me?!??!!\n\nDonald
Trump got too much debate advice, so he took none of
it.\nhttp://www.'slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2016/09/28/donaId_
trump_jot_too_much_debate_advice_so_he_took_none_ofjt.ht
Ran into Bill, he was trying to get a hold of Jim, who was in with his
Deputies. Secretary offered to grab him but Bill said no
He's calendared to go to the session board. Does he normally do
that? _
Hey are you able to step out to grab the product we discussed with
andy? They want it cleared tonight _
Hey I honestly did not know the specific reason for the concern,
other than what I told you. Thats why 1 was answering as I did, to
see if he'd provide more detail. _
It was a convo between him, Jim and Kortan....
You also left your update. Let me know when, I'll bring it up
before you go. \U0001f636
Hey I'm almost home, sorry. Remind me tomorrow what
said.
And do you still have that O'Reilly article about the D? I can't find it
hasn't an article, was Jason
telling me that O'Reilly was critical.
107
DOJ-PROD-0000273
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-09-30
INBOX
11:45:34, Fri
Yeah 1 could only find some a-hole blogger who was going on
his show.\n\nl am really tired of these people who are so blind
with extreme belief and hatred of the Clintons that ANYTHING that
does not fit their world view must be corrupt or incompetent.
2016-09-30
12:19:07, Fri
INBOX
Omg 1 need to talk to you \U0001f621\n\nlt obviously can wait, but
I just had a flash of two more years of cyber dysfunction
2016-09-30
23:05:07, Fri
INBOX
Yeah, is awesome! She coordinated that response apparently
with absolutely no one in CD. Because, you know, she was doing it.
2016-09-30
23:05:23, Fri
INBOX
Even though she’s had a sum total of 0 interaction on the topic
before this afternoon.
2016-09-30
23:08:05, Fri
OUTBOX
Yeah, that's incredibly aggravating. You call her, figure out where it
went?
2016^09-30
23:36:01, Fri
INBOX
Check email
2016-10-01
00:37:48, Sat
OUTBOX
Worse than anticipated, no?
2016-10-01
00:44:00, Sat
INBOX
The article? Not sure
2016-10-01
00:45:45, Sat
OUTBOX
2016-10-01
INBOX
00:50:38, Sat
2016-10-01
OUTBOX
01:01:35, Sat
Yeah, I couldn't tell either.
The same reporter wrote an article about
completely wrong... _
that was
Well that's good at least.
2016-10-01
01:11:10, Sat
INBOX
I think so. Don't think this will be too bad. I hope. \n\nAnd hi
2016-10-01
12:23:06, Sat
2016-10-01
13:56:16, Sat
INBOX
INBOX
,nd finished that Politico article. Pretty
Igood and accuarte, all in all
2016-10-02
01:14:31, Sun
INBOX
Holy sh*t. You see the NYT feed? No taxes for 20 years...
2016-10-02
12:16:35, Sun
INBOX
2016-10-02
13:20:54, Sun
INBOX
should YouTube the opening SNL skit. It was really funny.
i Ooh. Yay. I’ll check it out. Did you watch the SNL opener?
108
DOJ-PROD-0000274
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-10-02
13:22:20, Sun
2016-10-02
13:26:59, Sun
OUTBOX
INBOX
No, not yet. But texted me too and told me we had to watch it.
2016-10-02
13:27:01, Sun
2016-10-02
13:37:48, Sun
2016-10-02
14:07 :58, Sun
2016-10-02
16:06:19, Sun
2016-10-03
12:12:47', Mon
2016-10-03
19:36:29, Mon
2016-10-03
20:35:24, Mon
2016-10-03
21:01:44, Mon
2016-10-03
21:02:30, Mon
2016-10-04
17:43:39, Tue
2016-10-05
01:00:23, Wed
2016-10-05
01:06:42,Wed
2016-10-05
01:11:02, Wed
2016-10-05
01:15:33, Wed
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
2016-10-05
01:30:42, Wed
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
Working on ERAS. Just emailed Sporre to essentially say are
you SURE you have absolutely no update for the D from last week?
. ( Because I know vou.doL\U.QQQlf£12_
I I'm also going to email Bill and ask him to say we need a 5 minute
carve out at the beginning or end to and sensitive
I ag ency stuff. We can't do that with 20 people there. _
Oh. And watch snl campaign family feud. Putin is on Trumps team.
[Hilari ous. _
I would just email Bill and rybicki at the same time.
Sigh. I'm sitting here working. ’
Damn. Might have made it for the D brief, except that there are a
billion people in line try ing to get in. \U0001f612
] Hi. Getting coffee with Jon and
Ooh, and I have personnel gossips
And just got back at ; or his DAD demotion comment, \u263a
Going to sign my PAR
Cartwright took the plea!
|TPs sent. Wasn't able to link up with
Tried calling, lyncing, and emailing
He texted me at 836 to ask if I could talk, i said yes at 9, but no
response yet______
Ok,: that's a little aggravating. Maybe he was out and just had his
phone. Please let me know if there's anything relevant so I can
answer if somebody asks me a question. Thanks.
He probably had just left already.
He just wrote me back \n\nah never mind. We just talked to
Will fill every bo dy to morrow. _
Thanks \n\nThen I'm going to let Bill run up the chain tomorrow
morning what's in his inbox now, you can adjust Andy later as
needed.
109
DOJ-PROD-0000275
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-10-05
OUTBOX
just called me. Can you talk?
01:39:36, Wed
2016-10-05
01:55:21, Wed
INBOX
Sh*tty days that 1 want over as soon as possible. \n\nThe whole
thing was a nice little kick in the nuts way to end the day.
\n\nAnywav.
2016-10-05
12:01:25, Wed
INBOX
WH sent language, let me know if you can talk.
2016-10-05
13:22:04, Wed
OUTBOX
Make sure you call
2016-10-05
13:37:52, Wed
INBOX
Toscas called Bill on same. Said DIRNSA was
2016-10-05
13:38:24, Wed
OUTBOX
Kortan with me now, don't think they have the name. Just asked
Andy if thst changes their calculus.
2016-10-05
13:55:29, Wed
INBOX
Steinbach said same thing. You around?
2016-10-05
13:56:03, Wed
OUTBOX
Have his last name only. Now looking for everyone in Maryland
with that last name. Ha.
2016-10-05
13:56:28, Wed
OUTBOX
1 need to talk to Jim re intc, then will be.
2016-10-05
16:34:24, Wed
OUTBOX
Hey just called.
2016-10-05
22:22:24, Wed
INBOX
Going in to see Bill. Will try not to smile too big
2016-10-05
22:48:10, Wed
2016-10-05
22:48:56, Wed
2016-10-05
22:52:16, Wed
2016-10-05
22:52:53, Wed
2016-10-05
22:55:08, Wed
2016-10-05
23:03:22, W ed
2016-10-05
23:21:52. Wed
2016-10-05
23:38:30, Wed
2016-10-05
2016-10-05
23:47:05. Wed
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
I INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OH SWEET JESUS\n\nTHERE ARE 128 EMAILS ON SCION SINCE LAST
NIGHT
I know! That's what I was telling you!
And a bunch of crapola about European data privacy officials
expressing grave concern about this, Commerce getting calls from
the European Commission and OH MY GOD I HATE F*CKING
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS ONLY MARGINALLY MORE
EFFECTIVE THA N FIFA! _
I hate them\n\nl have no idea why I studied them so with my
undergraduate and graduate formal education\n\nThey are
abhorrent. _
And oh my God the Privacy Shield may fall apart, leading to civil
disorder and and (breathless) and _
Yup, I hate them too.
Sigh. I'm sorry. I'm clearing sentinel.
I
I
Just saw Eric going into HQ, talking with our favorite officer...had a
ost-HH look
INBOX
All good...yeah, that s me just finally leaving work. I see you
110
DOJ-PROD-0000276
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-10-05 OUTBOX You see me? What are you talking about?
23:50:20, Wed ___
2016-10-05 .INBOX My look to him
23:51:27, Wed i
2016-10-05
23:59:49, Wed
INBOX
Did he travel with him?!?!\n\nYeah all good, had to solve the
world's EG problems.
2016-10-06
00:01:47, Thu
OUTBOX
And yes, he did. He always does.
2016-10-06
00:02:57, Thu
INBOX
I didn't know that. Thats irritating
2016-10-06
OUTBOX
Kinda crazy about the Atlantic and USA Today. \n\nThe Editorialists
01:58:51, Thu
Have Spoken; Will Voters Listen? http://nyti.ms/2dFmvcm
INBOX
No they won't listen, because they're f*cking stupid
2016-10-06
02:05:17, Thu
INBOX
And I'm moving to NZ
2016-10-06
14:04:31. Thu
OUTBOX
1
i
In with andy. One sec
2016-10-06
14:04:37, Thu
INBOX
Sorry been in meetings with Bill since 9, another one with him
starting now. Just left you VM. Done around 1040.
2016-10-06
14:43:41, Thu
INBOX
Boo.;) \n\nWhen do you open up? And did you get what you
needed that you wanted me to call about?
2016-10-06
14:57:19, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-10-06
22:43:51, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-10-06
23:11:14, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-10-06
23:18:44, Thu
INBOX
2016-10-06
23:20:17, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-10-06
23:21:08, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-10-06
23:21:37, Thu
INBOX
2016-10-06
23:21:48, Thu
INBOX
Yes, call is obe. Should be free at 11:15.
Might just be like what DD asked ours today. What's the plan to
figure out what else is out there.
Ill
DOJ-PROD-0000277
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-10-06
23:22:04, Thu
2016-10-06
23:22:31, Thu
2016-10-06
23:24:01, Thu
2016-10-06
23:24:34, Thu
2016-10-06
23:24:58, Thu
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
2016-10-07
09:53:05, Fri
INBOX
2016-10-07
10:02:33, Fri
INBOX
2016-10-07
10:03:33, Fri
INBOX
2016-10-07
10:03:56, Fr i
2016-10-07
10:04:02, Fri
2016-10-07
10:04:37, Fri
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
2016-10-07
10:05:41, Fri
2016-10-07
10:26:15, Fri
2016-10-07
10:28:17, Fri
2016-10-07
10:28:54, Fri
2016-10-07
10:34:04, Fri
2016-10-07
10:42:50, Fri
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
Jesus. More leaks in the NYT
Yeah and I made the mistake of reading some stupid NY Post article
about how agents are ready to revolt against D because of
MY.. .now I'm r eally angry.... _
There are a bunch of really ignorant people out there blinded by
their politics
You can't read that sh*t. And honestly, let them. The bu would be
better off without them. _._
There are.
Sadly reminds me how deeply politics, like religion, can sometimes
blind obje ctivity. _
I can't help it. It's dick bait. I emailed it to you.
I don't want it!
Too late. Just ignore it. Also sent a really thoughtful David Brooks
colum n. I really like him . \U00 01f60a_
Poor gotta be up, too...
You meeting at hq? You should have just offered to get her at
home, avoid the metro ride?
True. Suppose I could still do that
Just shot her an email
Referenced in Brooks' article. I was one of his blog devotees for
YEARS.\n\nAndrew Sullivan: My Distraction Sickness \u2014 and
Yours\nhttp://nymag.com/selectall/2016/09/andrew-sullivan-
technoIogy-almost-killed-me.html
112
DOJ-PROD-0000278
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-10-07
10:44:17, Fri
INBOX
Flaven't read him...
2016-10-07
10:45:49, Fri
OUTBOX
One of the finest thinkers of our day. An HIV+ gay conservative, but
thoughtful and open to change. A lot like David Brooks.
2016-10-07
10:59:54, Fri
INBOX
What time is prep -1130?
2016-10-07
11:12:18, Fri
INBOX
God npr is depressing right noe
OUTBOX
Yes. \n\nWhy?
2016-10-07
11:21:31, Fri
INBOX
No invite, trying to make sure my calendar is right
2016-10-07
11:23:49, Fri
OUTBOX
Sorry, looks like she screwed it up.
2016-10-07
11:26:24, Fri
INBOX
Np. Not casting aspersions, just getting mine right. Did she send it
out to others at least (so they know)?
2016-10-07
11:26:52, Fri
OUTBOX
Yes. Appears to be correct otherwise.
2016-10-07
11:32:07, Fri
INBOX
K. DD's Conf room?
2016-10-07
12:17:35, Fri
INBOX
Yeah thanks. Got background ok doj's concerns about this.
P*SSies...\U0001f621\U0001f621\U0001f621
2016-10-07
15:09:30, Fri
OUTBOX
1 want to set up a mtg with you and Bill re into.
2016-10-07
15:10:09, Fri
INBOX
Ok. He's back Thurs afternoon
2016-10-07
15:10:50, Fri
INBOX
What’s up with intc?
2016-10-07
15:11:51, Fri
OUTBOX
Had mtg with Bowdich et al this am
2016-10-07
21:45:45, Fri
INBOX
Rethought my response to the CYD advisory. Think it’s probably
good for morale.
2016-10-08
12:35:47, Sat
INBOX
Currently reading about Trump. Wondering if he stepped down if
Pence could actually get elected.
2016-10-08
12:36:20, Sat
OUTBOX
That’s probably more likely than Trump getting elected.
2016-10-08
12:37:10, Sat
INBOX
1 agree. 1 think it would actually energize the Republican
vote.
2016-10-08
12:39:06, Sat
INBOX
You watching the debate on Sunday?
2016-10-08
12:39:47, Sat
OUTBOX
We’ll see how things are going.
2016-10-09
01:15:18, Sun
INBOX
Plus, sent you some emails with articles. Watching the Republicans
melt down
113
DOJ-PROD-0000279
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-10-09
13:24:27, Sun
INBOX
And I'm HUGE pissed because we found info (via searching
Sentinel on an account that came out) that is wildly, hugely
relevant to what we're doing. Just sitting there in a field office CYD
file. Nobody caring, not interested.
\U0001f620\U0001f620\U0001f620\U0001f620\n\nThey‘re
BROKEN, Lisa! Is it going to take some Peking 9/11 - type event for
everybody to stop saying, just coordinate better, have lots of
meetings, figure it out? \n\nThe Bu will still recruit cyber people if
we have a directorate. We will still recruit people if we can offer
them work against cyber criminals, or state actors, or terrorists.
2016-10-09
13:29:37, Sun
INBOX
And dammit, our guys shared it with the,TF on Fri (the right thing
to do). Challenge is 1 bet both agency and Fort share it with their
seniors Tues AM, if not before.
2016-10-09
13:36:06, Sun .
OUTBOX
Well Andy AND D are out all week anyway.
2016-10-09
13:37:30, Sun
OUTBOX
God, now 1 want to know what it is.
2016-10-09
13:38:11, Sun
INBOX
I’ll send it on eras. I'm just worried dcia gets it and goes direct with
D and/or WH.
2016-10-09
13:39:59, Sun
OUTBOX
Wow. Yeah but there's no way I'm getting the time to get on eras
today.
2016-10-09
13:40:47, Sun
INBOX
Ok. I'll call you later and we can talk around it
2016-10-09
13:41:13, Sun
OUTBOX
Do you want to send to DD and 1 can let him know to check eras?
2016-10-09
13:41:57, Sun
INBOX
Not before 1 talk with Bill and/or Mike.
2016-10-09
13:42:22, Sun
OUTBOX
Although he's in Hawaii with the DNI so I'm not sure he has it.
2016-10-09
13:45:24, Sun
INBOX
Jackson Hole (or wherever) then Hawaii. Tough life if you're the
dni....
2016-10-09
13:48:32, Sun
OUTBOX
Yeah but this is actually a follow on to a trip to Germany and is an
utter waste of time. Dd absolutely doesn’t want to be there.
2016-10-09
13:49:56, Sun
INBOX
1 can imagine. It's a long way to go to then have to come back to
SD. Is Eric with him?
2016-10-09
13:56:20, Sun
OUTBOX
Don't think so, but don't know.
2016-10-09
19:57:12, Sun
OUTBOX
Hey, andy just texted the following:\n\nThere is a HO agent
who is coming to the airport to show us something
else. You might be able to have him bring it. But we are about to
leave SF and will be in HO in 5.5 hours.
2016-10-09
19:58:33, Sun
OUTBOX
His email is completely failing right now, so he didn't get you email,
if you want to email it to the above agent when you get home,
there should be plenty of time. \n\nOr you can check eras
114
DOJ-PROD-0000280
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-10-09
20:19:05, Sun
INBOX
2016-10-09
21:07:51, Sun
INBOX
And funny quote from way Trump will drop
out. Hey Republicans: how does it feel to carry something to
term?"
2016-10-10
OUTBOX
I'm not sure 1 have it in me to watch the
00:12:38, Mon
debate.
2016-10-10
00:31:07, Mon
OUTBOX
Did you get my text re sending an eras to that dude?
2016-10-10
00:33:34, Mon
INBOX
1 did, but wasn't clear if vould get it. Do you think it's worth
sending? Bill did say he talked to Steinbach and talked around the
subject with him,
2016-10-10
00:34:46, Mon
OUTBOX
1 told Andy you would. Up to you. Don't really know what it says so
it's hard for me to evaluate.
2016-10-10
00:35:11, Mon
INBOX
Then ok, 1 will.
2016-10-10
00:35:44, Mon
OUTBOX
Make sure you email him on low side too. Is there still time?
2016-10-10
00:37:19, Mon
INBOX
1 just did to ask.
2016-10-10
OUTBOX
00:38:05, Mon
2016-10-10
00:46:09, Mon
INBOX
Decide if you're watching the debate?
2016-10-10
00:47:49, Mon
OUTBOX
I think no. will let you know
2016-10-10 •
01:22:32, Mon
INBOX
Debate is nasty....\n\nAlso, heard from
he's already at airport. He's willing to make a second trip but
I'm not sure if it's worth if right now, especially if Bill got gist to
Mike.
2016-10-10 INBOX
Trump saying agents at FBI are furious at the MYE outcome and
01:23:55, Mon
he's getting a special prosecutor.
2016-10-10
01:24:06, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-10-10
01:27:32, Mon
INBOX
2016-10-11
02:01:21, Tue
INBOX
2016-10-11
02:01:27, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-10-11
02:02:03, Tue
INBOX
2016-10-11
02:02:21, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-10-11 'OUTBOX
02:02:25, Tue I _
I'm not watching.
I am. Just getting aggravated.
It doesn't even count. It's just Email him now and let him
know something came up at home and tell him you can back brief.
Good, yes.
115
DOJ-PROD-0000281
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-10-11
02:05:45, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-10-11
10:00:11, Tue
IN80X
2016-10-11
10:24:43, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-10-11
10:24:58, Tue
INBOX
2016-10-11
10:25:39, Tue
INBOX
2016-10-11
10:26:12, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-10-11
21:54:43, Tue
INBOX
2016-10-11
21:55:45, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-10-11
21:56:08, Tue
INBOX
2016-10-11
21:59:43, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-10-11
21:59:59, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-10-11
22:04:19, Tue
INBOX
And look at how much you have to talk to about! \U0001f61a
Sigh\U0001f636\n\nl went to sleep imagining it.\n\nRe your timing
this morning, it'll be late, but 1 can swing by after
2016-10-11 | INBOX
22:21:22, Tue !
2016-10-11 INBOX
22:38:19, Tue _
2016-10-11 OUTBO
22:48:26, Tue
2016-10-12 INBOX
00:05:06, Wed
2016-10-12 OUTBO
00:08:37, Wed _
2016-10-12 OUTBO
02:54:03, Wed
2016-10-12 INBOX
02:54:22, Wed _
2016-10-12 | OUTBOX
03:04:57, Wed '
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
Give a call post-
then hustling out to
11 will. Of course, I want to stop by, regardless. \U00Dlf636
Uh yeah, that's not going to happen.
Uh, it just did
But yeah, I can totally see that.
I get that, but it's going to unhappen, and right quick.
Yeah, checking Sentinel now. Looks like cd7A now has access...not
sure if that was a recent add. Jon and I can no longer see it, though
it's more relevant for the [As to be able to. Of course, Jon and I are
still here, and none of them are.\n\nStill, irritating....we’ll get it
fixed __ _
Currently fighting with
Can I call you when we're done?
Yes, though will be hard.
And yes, please bring it in. Just leaving now. Had to double back to
talk to Toscas. Have his nsts line now, at least. _._
That's good, because that's literally all he uses.
Ho-ly sh*t. Did you read this? \n\nFor Many Women,
Trump\u2019s \u2018Locker Room Talk\u2019 Brings Memories of
Abuse htt p:/ / nyti.ms/2dSWW F6 _
Sigh. Stupid dnd, I didn't see these.
Hot damn. Big news day.\n\nBuffett Calls Trump\u2019s Bluff and
Releases His Tax Data http://nyti.ms/2dS10M5_
116
DOJ-PROD-0000282
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-10-12 OUTBOX
03:16:30, Wed
2016-10-12 INBOX
09:59:46, Wed
2016-10-12 OUTBOX
10:00:06, Wed
2016-10-12 INBOX
10:01:08, Wed _
2016-10-12 INBOX
10:08:33, Wed
2016-10-12 INBOX
14:47:50, Wed
Wow, more forceful than I have seen him.
,n\nDonaId Trump\u2Q19s Sad, Lonely Life
http://nvti.ms/2dTCZxP _
Ok, the locker room talk twitter campaign was amazing and sad.
And I do like David Brooks. Reading Warren
buffet now _
\U0001f621\nhttp://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/10/12/us/politics/
donald-trump-voters.html
Aaaaand I left my badge in the card reader. Can't get back in, so get
in extra early for tem p badge t omorrow \U0001f621 _
30 sec\n\nRan into
Sorry, was on with andy. Told him about senator and BA. Did ask
ab out Monday, so I'll brin g them in. _
Asked him to tell them what I do. \U0001f612
Had Rybicki mentioned? Was sent about an hour ago
Mentioned what? About No. Andy hadn't heard.
117
DOJ-PROD-OOOCI283
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-10-13
23:50:20, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-10-13
23:51:16, Thu
INBOX
2016-10-13
23:52:12, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-10-13
23:52:32, Thu
INBOX
2016-10-13
23:53:39, Thu
INBOX
2016-10-13 INBOX
23:54:09, Thu
2016-10-13 OUTBOX
2016-10-14
00:00:36, Fri
INBOX
2016-10-14
00:05:32, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-10-14
00:10:26, Fri
2016-10-14
00:12:58, Fri
2016-10-14
00:13:28, Fri
INBOX
What did you take care of? Do we know it's a forgery? Could
c ould n' t, right?
? Not following your last. Def a
2016-10-14
00:13:41, Fri
INBOX
2016-10-14
00:37:47, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-10-14
00:40:28, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-10-14
INBOX
00:42:48, Fri
2016-10-14
00:43:24, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-10-14
00:48:08, Fri
OUTBOX
Not sure why I thought this was so neat. Suppose it's just the law
nerd in me.\n\nThe Times\u2019s Lawyer Responds to Donald
Trump http://nyti.ms/2e0WNza _
God, she's an incredibly impressive woman. The Obamas in
general, really. While he has certainly made mistakes, I'm proud to
have had him as my president. \n\nVoice Shaking, Michelle Obama
Calls Trump Comments on Women \u2018lntolerable\u2019
I I iVBiiWEit] lo
Ugh. More of the same.\n\nDonald Trump, Slipping in Polls, Warns
of \u2018Stolen Election\u2019 http://nyti.ms/2e07imx
118
DOJ-PROD-OOOCI284
Strzok-Paee Texts
2016-10-14
00:49:51, Fri
INBOX
That's not very helpful.
2016-10-14
00:50:39, Fri
INBOX
He's not going to do much to tamp down the conspiracy theories...
2016-10-14
00:51:26, Fri
2016-10-14
00:52:36, Fri
2016-10-14
00:52:43, Fri
2016-10-14
00:53:52, Fri
2016-10-14
01:00:2 0, Fri
2016-10-14
01:00:59, Fri
2016-10-14
01:36:28, Fri
2016-10-14
01:37:21, Fri
2016-10-14
12:06:56, Fri
2016-10-14
12:15:49, Fri
2016-10-14
14:25:25, Fri
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
Nope. Full of dog whistles too: "We do not want this election
stolen from us. Everybody knows what I'm talking about." The
racism is barelv even veiled anymore.
The Roger Stone comments are scary as sh*t.
2016-10-14
01:38:58, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-10-14
01:45:11, Fri
INBOX
2016-10-14
01:45:57, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-10-14
01:49:35, Fri
INBOX
2016-10-14
01:50:48, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-10-14
01:51:01, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-10-14
12:04:49, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-10-14
12:06:00, Fri
INBOX
Reading the most depressing lead story about Trump in the NYT,
And couldn't be prouder, or sadder, of first lady’s comments.
You in your ofc?
|\U0001f636 K. I'll bring PAR motivation...
119
DOJ-PROD-OOOCI285
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-10-15
00:54:42, Sat
INBOX
Hi. Talked with JG for a while. A lot to tel! you.
2016-10-15
01:26:22, Sat
INBOX
Stone \u2018happy to cooperate\u2019 with FBI on WikiLeaks,
Russian hacking probes -
POLITICO\nhttp://www. politico.com/story/2016/10/roger-stone-
fbi-wikileaks-russia-229821
2016-10-15
11:18:48, Sat
INBOX
Sorry, was emailing Jon and Bill and Jason about the PC prep,
came back and asked if WF should reach out to Carper's DC staff.
\n\nln the interest of time, 1 think Jason and 1 should just
conference call his staff director this weekend, and wf can follow
up as needed. At least that way we have initial info and the D can
sav we've made contact.
2016-10-15
11:19:49, Sat
OUTBOX
Makes sense to me.
2016-10-15
11:55:13, Sat
INBOX
Sorry was just talking to Jason.\n\nNo plans other than this
Congress call and writing the stupid prep stuff
2016-10-15
12:19:58, Sat
INBOX
This is
appalling\nhttp://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_580120b7e4b0e8c
198a7fl39
INBOX http://rn.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5800381fe4b0e8cl98a74744
2016-10-15
INBOX
13:45:20, Sat
with Carper's COS
shortly....
2016-10-15
INBOX
Call went well. She confirmed Sen spoke with Monaco on Thurs
14:14:44, Sat
night. They’re issuing a press release about it on Mon.
2016-10-15
14:45:11, Sat
OUTBOX
That's going to get political in a hurry.
2016-10-15
14:48:25, Sat
INBOX
And I was careful about my statements to her but nonetheless will
document them in an email on the Secret side....
2016-10-15
14:51:22, Sat
OUTBOX
That's smart.
2016-10-15
14:51:31, Sat
OUTBOX
No, re Andy and lunch.
2016-10-15
15:15:06, Sat
INBOX
Lunch get political? Not following.
2016-10-15
15:15:13, Sat
INBOX
Even if just the four of you go?
2016-10-15
15:15:59, Sat
OUTBOX
No, carpers statement.
2016-10-15 OUTBOX
15:16:57, Sat _
2016-10-15
INBOX
15:18:53, Sat !
120
DOJ-PROD-0000286
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-10-15
21:25:48, Sat
INBOX
That didn't take long \U0001f621
2016-10-15
21:28:10, Sat
OUTBOX
At least we made the f-ers work on the weekend...
2016-10-15
21:30:09, Sat
INBOX
Uh, and, yeah - like they're doing to us.\n\nl HATE this case.
\n\nAnd a LOT to tell you about my convo with JG...
2016-10-15
22:04:26, Sat
OUTBOX
Very nice work on that initial statement. Maybe we can talk
tomorrow re JG..
2016-10-16
00:13:34, Sun
INBOX
Do we prevent Hardy from being subpoenaed?
2016-10-16
00:14:56, Sun
OUTBOX
1 don't know. But he’ll be okay...
2016-10-16
INBOX
Maybe.
14:56:11, Sun
—■
2016-10-16
14:56:25, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-10-16
INBOX
_a
14:56:43, Sun
2016-10-16
16:23:37, Sun
INBOX
Hey just thinking - do you have a current official passport?
2016-10-16
17:45:54, Sun
OUTBOX
1 do. Need to find it, but 1 think it is still good. Remind me Monday.
2016-10-16
18:23:30, Sun
OUTBOX
And if we do go to london, I’m going to have to call
2016-10-16
INBOX
jj^^^iSHiBPHHmAnd Rybicki just called -
18:24:20, Sun
1 II Mllll 1 1 ■ ...
2016-10-16
18:25:35, Sun
OUTBOX
K. Let me know what he's calling about...
2016-10-16
18:33:49,5un
INBOX
Hi. Done. Talk?
2016-10-16
18:55:03, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-10-16
18:55:28, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-10-16
18:56:39, Sun
INBOX
2016-10-16
18:57:12, Sun
INBOX
2016-10-16
19:09:15, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-10-16
19:10:22, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-10-16
20:58:00, Sun
INBOX
2016-10-16
20:58:24, Sun
INBOX
121
DOJ-PROD-0000287
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-10-16
20:59:35, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-10-16
21:01:57, Sun
INBOX
2016-10-16
21:09:31, Sun
INBOX
2016-10-16
22:09:21, Sun
INBOX
2016-10-16
22:09:55, Sun
INBOX
2016-10-16
22:14:09, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-10-16
22:20:38, Sun
INBOX
2016-10-16
22:28:34, Sun
INBOX
2016-10-16
22:29:27, Sun
INBOX
2016-10-16
22:43:38, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-10-16
22:44:33, Sun
INBOX
2016-10-16
22:44:57, Sun
INBOX
2016-10-16 OUTBOX
22:45:09, Sun
2016-10-16
22:45:28, Sun
INBOX
2016-10-16
22:45:51, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-10-16
22:47:21, Sun
INBOX
2016-10-16
22:50:15, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-10-16 INBOX
22:51:59, Sun ;
2016-10-16 jOUTBOX Nostalgia for the Grace of George H.W. Bush
23 :25:28, Sun I
2016-10-17 INBOX
http :/ /nyti.ms/2e6GssP __
Thbtbtbtbt. Really? \U0001f618\n\nBill just filled 10:00 AM fire
drill time with DAD interviews. \U0001f612\n\r
122
DOJ-PROD-0000288
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-10-17
14:27:08, Mori
INBOX
Rgr. Doing interviews thru the alarms...
2016-10-17
14:27:32, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-10-17
INBOX
15:01:01, Mon
2016-10-17
OUTBOX
15:02:06, Mon
__ : _
2016-10-17
15:03:08, Mon
INBOX
2016-10-17
OUTBOX
20:43:23, Mon
2016-10-17
20:44:44, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-10-17
23:07:45, Mon
INBOX
I worry they're written for non-lawuers by lawyers, and reviewed
by lawyers. \n\nDon't forget how dumb we are.
2016-10-17
23:07:59, Mon
INBOX
There's some exclamation points there!\n\nHaving some concerns
about these TPs, especially if they're leaked....
2016-10-17
23:08:31, Mon
INBOX
Sorry, order of last two texts flipped
2016-10-17
23:09:23, Mon
OUTBOX
Well they are for public disem, so we will have to read them in that
light.\n\nI'm certainly worried about your dumb brethren not
understanding the nuance, but what's the leak worry?
2016-10-17 .OUTBOX
23:09:55, Mon i
You know who would be good to review and put them in dumb
speak? Stephen Kelly. Lots of years dealing with dummies.
2016-10-17 INBOX
1 think we need to expand the other sections. In some cases, they
23:12:10, Mon _ don't adequately convey our reasoning behind decisions
2016-10-17 OUTBOX (Then let's do it.
23:12:29, Mon _
2016-10-17 INBOX Let's. Need to get home and will take a crack at it.
23:13:57, Mon I _
2016-10-17 'OUTBOX I need to print this tomorrow! Important.
23:14:11, Mon I
2016-10-17
23:35:16, Mon
INBOX
It's ok, you've got that bg bonus coming....oh, wait, no. Thats for
the people there for more than a year. Like and
2016-10-17
23:36:24, Mon
INBOX
They drink in London.
2016-10-17
23:37:06, Mon
OUTBOX
1 especially like drinking in London. 1 will be the official food and
beverage tour guide.
2016-10-17
23:41:54, Mon
INBOX
Can blue collar Budweiser guys like me and Jon afford your taste?
2016-10-17
23:45:11, Mon
OUTBOX
On per diem you can!;)
123
DOJ-PROD-OOOQ289
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-10-17
23:47:23, Mon
INBOX
Ha. 1 have made poor career decisions for sure. Can I go to London
and not talk about any of this stuff that I'm incredibly sick of
thinking and talking about? Maybe do a dramatic poetry reading or
something instead?
2016-10-17
23:49:56, Mon
INBOX
...or better yet...maybe 1 can just carry the bags for a DAD and wait
outside?
2016-10-17
23:52:52, Mon
INBOX
No. You will be the Mysterious Mute Election Analyst. Just
grunt and shake your head up and down or left and right. \n\nGet
that carnie vibe going
2016-10-17
23:53:13, Mon
OUTBOX
1 thought 1 was the official bag carrier!
2016-10-17
23:55:22, Mon
INBOX
I’ll take one handle of the bag and you take the other.
2016-10-17
23:58:22, Mon
INBOX
I’m seriously thinking one of us needs to host election night party.
2016-10-18
00:00:22, Tue
OUTBOX
1 nominate
2016-10-18
00:02:35, Tue
INBOX
I'll probably have to write talking points (likely for CyD) so 1 won't
be able to make it.
2016-10-18
00:05:39, Tue
OUTBOX
You don't have to write talking points for Cyber if they don't tell
you about the tasking!
INBOX
Word.
2016-10-18
00:28:47, Tue
INBOX
CyD prepping for election day on November 35th....
2016-10-18
00:30:40, Tue
INBOX
Fine, fine, was an SNLjoke.\n\nhttp://youtu.be/qVMW_laZXRk
BiSg
INBOX
Hi. This is literally slowing to a crawl since 1 have a months long
thread. I should delete it but 1 don't wanna....
2016-10-18
00:50:51, Tue
INBOX
Plus it'll take 5 minutes to delete. Suppose 1 could imsg.
\U0001f60a
2016-10-18
00:51:03, Tue
OUTBOX
I honestly don't think the size is what slows it. These phones just
suck.
2016-10-18
00:52:22, Tue
INBOX
To be fair, the thread goes back to Aug 23
\U0001f636\U0001f636\U0001f636\U0001f636
2016-10-18
00:53:43, Tue
OUTBOX
1 think mine might be April. 1 just don't want to make the effort to
find out.
2016-10-18
09:54:35, Tue
INBOX
Sigh. I've got to get going and get stuff to Bill before
\U0001f612
2016-10-18
09:55:00, Tue
INBOX
You ever hear back from Jim or Trisha on TPs?
2016-10-18
10:00:24, Tue
OUTBOX
Yes. said they would read it and provide comments this am.
2016-10-18 OUTBOX
10:12:13, Tue
2016-10-18 INBOX
11:39:38, Tue_
124
DOJ-PROD-0000290
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-10-18
11:40:19, Tue
2016-10-18
13:10:47, Tue
2016-10-18
13:36:36, Tue
2016-10-18
13:38:03, Tue
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
Np. Need 10 min...
2016-10-18
16:29:13, Tue
INBOX
2016-10-18
OUTBOX
Hey I've gotta go now because I have no break after 1. I'm bringing
back, let me know if you want me to get you something
Need to call
first.
21:08:02, Tue
2016-10-18
22:32:59, Tue
INBOX
Me too. Walked into office, Jon and Bill were there....really want to
talk to you now...\U0001f636
2016-10-18
OUTBOX
And 1 found my official passport...
22:44:33, Tue
2016-10-18
22:46:23, Tue
INBOX
Yay! Still valid?
2016-10-18
22:46:50, Tue
OUTBOX
Yup! Exactly a year to go...
2016-10-18
23:29:36, Tue
OUTBOX
How late you think you are going to be there?
2016-10-18
23:30:25, Tue
INBOX
Just left
2016-10-18
23:37:25, Tue
OUTBOX
No, not necessarily. Just thought by your mye description that you
might be there a while.
2016-10-18
23:39:26, Tue
INBOX
No I gave up, will re engage tomorrow. Brought home TPs to
review.
2016-10-19
00:29:20, Wed
OUTBOX
A little heavy-handed, but still, kind of incredible.\n\nHow do we
respond to threats after our
endorsement?\nhttp://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/2016/l
0/16/publisher-response-to-threats-after-republic-endorsement-
clinton-trumo/92058964/
2016-10-19
00:45:08, Wed
INBOX
Can you talk? We absolutely must expedite. It was submitted as an
expedite. 1 had to email as much. What the fuck is going on?
2016-10-19
01:22:17, Wed
INBOX
e only thing
i objected to was the he said - she said comment. There is no
ambiguity about who's right on this current point, and I furious at
doj for suggesting otherwise - and we need to call them on it
2016-10-19
09:55:26, Wed
INBOX
You see Tim Cook made the list of potential HRC running mates?
2016-10-19
09:56:05, Wed
OUTBOX
Gross, no.
2016-10-19
09:57:48, Wed
INBOX
It was a big list, but still, he was on there. From Podesta email.
125
DOJ-PROD-0000291
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-10-19
10:04:26, Wed
INBOX
\u201cl\u2019ll look for... well, M:\u2019s called racial profiling.
Mexicans. Syrians. People who can\u2019t speak American,\u201d
he said, \u201cl\u2019m going to go right up behind them.
I\u2019ll do everything legally. 1 want to see if they are
accountable. I\u2019m not going to do anything illegal. I\u2019m
going to make them a little bit nervous.\u201d\n\nTrump\u2019s
supporters talk rebellion, assassination at his rallies - The Boston
Globe\nhttp://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2016/10/15/
donald-trump-warnings-conspiracy-rig-election-are-stoking-anger-
among-his-
followers/LcCY6eOQOcfH8VdeK9UdsM/story.html?pl=ArticleJTren
ding Most Viewed
—
2016-10-19
INBOX
It's Briefed up Bill with that and dates. He will provide to
11:54:12, Wed
Andy.
2016-10-19
INBOX
Came up with election night plan - we should all hit HH
13:04:19, Wed
somewhere. Figure this damn thing better be called early.
\U0001f612\n\nYou watching the debate tonight?
2016-10-19
OUTBOX
That's a good plan.
13:04:50, Wed
2016-10-19
OUTBOX
13:04:59, Wed
2016-10-19
OUTBOX
DAG approved. 1 told already to stand by for one edit. Am going
20:18:08, Wed
to go tell andy now.
2016-10-19
OUTBOX
Might be a minute past 4:30 because 1 am waiting for Andy to leave
20:23:06, Wed
d office to tell him.
2016-10-19
OUTBOX
Yeah. But still waiting for Andy.
20:31:29, Wed
2016-10-20
INBOX
You got a
00:34:16, Thu
bonus from MYE.
2016-10-20
INBOX
Just write, look, I'm supposed to get some small amount, or
00:37:04, Thu
something I, for MYE. Plus some time off. Then do 4-5 days.
\n\nPlease. 1 insist. I'll make up the $ in per diem in London...
2016-10-20
INBOX
You gotta watch the debates....
00:54:15, Thu
2016-10-20
OUTBOX
I'm not watching. 1 honestly don't want to. It is not worth the stress
00:57:07, Thu
to me.
2016-10-20
INBOX
1 cannot believe what
01:15:12, Thu
l.am hearing.
2016-10-20
INBOX
1 am riled up. Trump is a fucking idiot, is unable to provide a
01:15:44, Thu
coherent answer.
2016-10-20
OUTBOX
Please. 1 honestly don't want to know.
01:16:28, Thu
2016-10-20
OUTBOX
It's not worth your stress either.
01:20:41, Thu
126
DOJ-PROD-0000292
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-10-20
01:22:36, Thu
INBOX
1 CAN'T PULL AWAY. WHAT THE FUCK HAPPENED TO OUR
COUNTRY, LIS?!??!?!
2016-10-20
01:23:08, Thu
INBOX
2016-10-20
01:24:19, Thu
OUTBOX
1 don't know. But we'll get it back. We're America. We rock.
2016-10-20
01:28:22, Thu
INBOX
Donald just said "bad hombres"\n\n\U0001f612
2016-10-20
01:30:00, Thu
INBOX
.
Chris Wallace is a turd
2016-10-20
INBOX
Hillary: Russia and WikiLeaks and highest levels of Russian
01:30:02, Thu
Government and Putin!!!\n\nDrink!!!!
2016-10-20
01:31:15, Thu
OUTBOX
No.
2016-10-20
INBOX
Oh hot damn. HRC is throwing down saying Trump in bed with
01:32:40, Thu
russia
2016-10-20
01:49:01, Thu
INBOX
Sigh. I'm sorry. Just don't turn on this goddamn debate.
2016-10-20
01:49:29, Thu
OUTBOX
There's no chance.
2016-10-20
01:50:30, Thu
OUTBOX
what is watching going to accomplish?
You can read about it in the morning. Even watch clips if
you must.
2016-10-20
01:50:50, Thu
INBOX
She could do SO MUCH BETTER \n\nBut she's just not getting
traction.'
\U0C01f621\U0001f621\U0001f621\U0001f621
2016-10-20
01:51:20, Thu
INBOX
2016-10-20
01:52:13, Thu
OUTBOX
You DO have control over this anger and
frustration.
2016-10-20
02:02:43, Thu
INBOX
Maybe. 1 have to watch this. \n\nAnd I’m so damn mad, Lisa.
\n\nAnd disgusted. And disappointed.
2016-10-20
02:12:37, Thu
INBOX
Trump just said what the fbi did is disgraceful
2016-10-20 INBOX Hi. Watching the post-debate commentary. Vaguely satisfying to
09:56:27, Thu see Megyn Kelley (who had botox and looks HORRIBLE) utterly
going after Trump.
2016-10-20
10:57:57, Thu
OUTBOX
Our prep for Andy is at 9.
2016-10-20
15:19:55, Thu
OUTBOX
Have to go down and talk to andy probably around 12:30. Probably
only have time for lunch around here. Maybe tomorrow...
2016-10-20
17:00:41, Thu
INBOX
Noon tomorrow for call with seniors. Mikes office
127
DOJ-PROD-0000293
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-10-20
23:07:29, Thu
INBOX
2016-10-21
00:02:32, Fri
INBOX
2016-10-21
00:03:17, Fri
OUTBOX
2016-10-21
00:11:07, Fri
INBOX
2016-10-21
11:35:25, Fri
INBOX
2016-10-21
16:18:40, Fri
2016-10-21
16:29:35. Fri
2016-10-21
16:29:48, Fri
2016-10-21
16:44:39, Fr i
2016-10-21
16:45:05, Fri
2016-10-21
16:54:20, Fri
2016-10-21
16:57:44, Fri
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
Please have someone make one big binder of all the material. We'll
split it u p._ _
Will do. Whole case, starting with 302s?’
Maybe, \n\nl mentioned to Bill, he wants to sit in, mentioned he
wouldn't say any thing...._
I'll talk to andy/kortan tomorrow.
A) ok. Dont really want Bill there but i get it.
Yay. \u263a Talking with Mike. May be hard to check this with
and in here....
You sound a little defensive. Bring your voice down a notch.
But correct Mike, we didn't make the decision re prosecution.
;} done
We don't know but that's is not our job.
That is not a crime that we can prosecute.
Don't answer that. You can't defend the d
I've got it
Yeah but the d has done that. Chaffetz texts him directly.
;) passed that for ya
■
128
DOJ-PROD-0000294
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-10-21
OUTBOX
Be careful...
17:03:35, Fri
2016-10-21
20:34:54, Fri
INBOX
Yep. I'm out, dropping stuff at ofc
2016-10-21
20:37:10, Fri
OUTBOX
Mine? 1 need to unlock then.
2016-10-21
INBOX
My office. Headed to elevator now
20:42:07, Fri
2016-10-21
OUTBOX
22:38:27, Fri
2016-10-21
INBOX
r=-'i
22:46:17, Fri
2016-10-21
22:49:05, Fri
INBOX
Also, work-wise, called b/cToscas now aware NY has hrc-
huma emails via weiner invest. Told him we knew. Wanted to know
our thoughts on getting it.\n\nGeorge wanted to ensure info got to
Andv. I told Bill.
2016-10-21
INBOX
22:49:51, Fri
2016-10-21
OUTBOX
22:54:57, Fri
2016-10-21
22:55:10, Fri
OUTBOX
I'm sure Andy is aware, but whatever.
2016-10-23
18:49:08, Sun
OUTBOX
One sec, andy calling.
2016-10-23 OUTBOX Christ.
18:55:00, Sun
2016-10-23
18:55:06, Sun
OUTBOX
He just called.
2016-10-23
18:55:24, Sun
OUTBOX
Let me know when you can imsg. Not for here.
2016-10-23
18:55:28, Sun
INBOX
Wha?
2016-10-23
20:54:08, Sun
OUTBOX
Dd 100% supportive re your idea re Was grateful for the
suggestion. I'm sorry 1 couldn't give you credit.
2016-10-23
20:54:55, Sun
OUTBOX
He's also going to tell the Eads in the am, and call bill tonight, who
is supposed to call you, so you can call given the PC crap from
back when.
2016-10-23
20:55:09, Sun
OUTBOX
1 know, but I meant with him. It was a very smart idea.
2016-10-24
00:00:15^ Mon
OUTBOX
Article is out, but hidden behind paywall so can't read it.
2016-10-24
00:04:32, Mon
OUTBOX
Huh?
2016-10-24
00:02:22, Mon
INBOX
Wsj? Boy, that was fast.\n\nNo word from Bill. Should I "find" it
and tell the team?
2016-10-24
00:03:38, Mon
OUTBOX
No, I think not. Maybe he didn't get a chance, or bill decided not to
say anything until tomorrow.
129
DOJ-PROD-0000295
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-10-24
00:04:04, Mon
INBOX
Not behind a pay wall. 1 need to send
2016-10-24
00:04:59, Mon
IN80X
The article is not behind a paywall\n\nWe get several hours of
warning about every other email, but not this, arguably more
important than most...
2016-10-24
00:06:30, Mon
OUTBOX
Jesus Pete. Then fine. Send it to everyone you know. Or I can not
tell you about it at all and you can just come across it given all the
time you spend reading the Journal. \U0001f621
OUTBOX
What difference does it make to send it to the team Sunday night
vs monday morning?
2016-10-24
00:07:37, Mon
OUTBOX
Thanks dude. Appreciate it. \U0001f621
2016-10-24
00:08:15, Mon
INBOX
Or 1 can get it like I do every other article that hits my Google news
alert. Seriously.
2016-10-24
00:09:00, Mon
OUTBOX
Send me the Google alert.
2016-10-24
00:10:31, Mon
INBOX
Give me a break. Go look at EVERY article I've sent the team.
\n\nCount them.\n\nThen count every Godd*mn heads up 1 get
from Kortan and but NOT this one.\n\nThen tell
me i should sit on THIS one and let them hear from someone else.
You're not being„fair about this.
2016-10-24
00:12:17, Mon
INBOX
1 really cannot believe you're taking this position and it angers me.
I'm going to hope your anger about Andy and getting dragged
into this is clouding things.
2016-10-24
00:12:28, Mon
OUTBOX
I AM being fair about this. 1 asked you not to. 1 don't care that OPA
sucks. 1) This is about trust, and 2) WHAT THE F DIFFERENCE DOES
IT MAKE TO ANYONE ON THE TEAM? Is there some investigative
step to take? Some mitigation measure?
2016-10-24
00:13:02, Mon
INBOX
IT'S ON THE INTERNET!!!!!!
2016-10-24
00:13:26, Mon
OUTBOX
WHICH YOU ONLY KNOW ABOUT BECAUSE 1 TOLD YOU IT THERE.
OUTBOX
Good, then we can both be angry.
2016-10-24
00:14:24, Mon
INBOX
1 want people who worked this reading it online before people read
it first and ask them about it. I want them forewarned .\n\nFine so
1 see it in an hour? When 1 open the paper WSJ
tomorrow?\n\nThat's somehow different and OK?
2016-10-24
00:15:27, Mon
OUTBOX
Yes. Opening the paper tomorrow is not the same as 30 seconds
after it fucking posted.
2016-10-24
00:16:05, Mon
i
INBOX
You told me it was there 30 minutes after it went up. \n\nWhy are
you angry? Because it's critical of Andy? That's even MORE reason
to get the word out.\n\nAnd how dare you accuse me of violating
trust!?!? 1 give you candid advice for which I will tell no one and get
no credit because I care about him and the FBI. How dare you!
130
DOJ-PROD-0000296
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-10-24
00:17:24, Mon
OUTBOX
!Forewarned to do what? Because moffa or bill or are going to
spread it around town? So what, you sending TPs to fucking
so that he is forewarned and knows what the truth is? Because
without that vour claim is iust bullshit.
2016-10-24
00:19:13, Mon
OUTBOX
This has nothing to do with Andy. 1 asked you to wait until it came
to you. You would have had no idea any of this was out there but
for me. And 1 already thanked you for your excellent advice, iust a
tip, it's not the way to engender good will by doing a good deed
then rubbing a fucking nose in it.
2016-10-24
00:20:29, Mon
INBOX
Why do 1 send noteworthy articles at all, Lisa? Should 1 wait on all
of those? Should 1 treat ones accusing the FBI of stuff specially?
Hold those? \n\nYou never have had a SINGLE issue with my
promptness before. Typically, you appreciate it. This in no way
points to you. \n\nl'm so angry you'd accuse me of violating trust!
God! That hurts and l.try exceedingly hard to honor that in every
aspect of my life and ] certainly did here.
2016-10-24
00:21:05, Mon
INBOX
Lisa I'm not rubbing your nose in it! I'm telling you your betrayal of
trust line is wrong and out of bounds.
2016-10-24
00:21:47, Mon
i
INBOX
1 will ALWAYS give you my honest good advice and opinion without
any regard to what credit 1 get. 1 KNOW you go out of your way to
credit me whenever you can.
INBOX Again, why are you so damn angry? It was posted at 740!
00:22:17, Mon
2016-10-24
00:22:22, Mon
OUTBOX
Show me your Google alert.
2016-10-24
00:22:39, Mon
OUTBOX
You don't know to go look for this one but for me.
2016-10-24
00:26:14, Mon
INBOX
It hasn't hit Google yet! I'll send it when it happens. Maybe 5 min,
maybe 2 hours. \n\nBut the article was up a good 30 minutes
before you told me.\n\nAre you upset because you thinks this
points to you? Because if 1 waited that {20 minutes 2 hours
whatever) time it would be OK?\n\nWhat is it that's making you so
anp.rv? Because 1 simply don't get it.. ,
2016-10-24
00:27:59, Mon
OUTBOX
Yeah, and 1 told you a grand total of 2 minutes after 1 learned it was
up from andy. And you sent it 5 minutes after that. And if you
actually read your texts instead of desperately trying to be first,
you’ll see that us said no, 1 don't think you should send it.
2016-10-24
00:29:24, Mon
OUTBOX
1 shouldn't have to explain all of this. You knew it was there NOT
because of your Google alert, which is totally fair game, but
because of ME. I don't know why any of this is so hard to
understand.
'2016-10-24
00:29:29, Mon
INBOX
And god, I'm not trying to engender goodwill by doing a good job. 1
didn't rub your nose in it.
131
DOJ-PROD-0000297
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-10-24
00:31:47, Mon
INBOX
1 know that, and haven't said otherwise. \n\nNone of this is hard to
understand, which is why I'm asking you why you're so damn angry
at this. LITERALLY EVERY OTHER SIGNIFICANT ARTICLE we've
treated this way. And the article was out for half an hour. My
sending it in no way points to you. \n\nThe fact that everyone is
treating this so hush hush differently is part of the problem.
2016-10-24
00:33:27, Mon
INBOX
And 1 can only take your lack of response to my fury at being
accused of betraying your trust as either equal fury on your part or
an acknowledgement that you were wrong about that, \n\nl don't
treat your trust lightly or carelessly, Lisa. Don't so lightly accuse me
of doing so.
2016-10-24
00:34:09, Mon
OUTBOX
I'm done talking about this. No one is treating it all hush hush.
Could you stop already? This has nothing to do with the case or the
investigative team, and is all about trying to smear a public
servant. So how about you withhold judgment about what is
actuall^_going_on.
2016-10-24
00:34:59, Mon
OUTBOX
1 believe you betrayed my trust. If I thought 1 was wrong or had
made a mistake, I would just say so, thanks.
2016-10-24
INBOX
Sent you two good articles 1 doubt our press roundup will pick up.
09:58:44, Mon
Was that
on a bu website, or did you hear about it word of mouth?\n\n(and
yes I'm truly interested in all this stuff at the same time I'm trying
to find footing)_
And it's above the fold. Jerks.
I wonder how Devin got a hold of the story. I have theories.
And I don’t want to waste time today on the stupid argument last
And Devlin is saying, not implying there’s a connection here, but
look at the timing - server, then meeting, then case, then funding.
The point we need to highlight isn’t the March date of discovery of
the server - because to us, who cares? - it’s the date anyone
realized there was classified on there._
2016-10-24
10:01:30, Mon
2016-10-24
10:05:50, Mon
2016-10-24
10:09:15, Mon
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
132
DOJ-PROD-0000298
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-10-24 INBOX A) He did. And he's right. \n\nB) I agree we can't just drop it where
11:13:01, Mon
2016-10-24
11:17:26, Mon
2016-10-24
it is -1 just hate that this case is so ali-consuming and I'm so tired of
it and
am: yeah me too. Just got
VAnAny as to
Timms' nf election hrief to DP
OUTBOX
No, shitty ass still hasn't sent the invite out. 1 hate her.
INBOX
And talking to Moffa now, need to talk to you before you talk to
him
OUTBOX
INBOX Yes of course. Just don't talk to Moffa before
12:03:27, Mon
2016-10-24
18:23:19, Mon
INBOX
Sorry Bill is hell on keeping on schedule
2016-10-24
18:23:45, Mon
INBOX
And then Scott ambushes me
\U0001f612\U0001f612\U0001f612\U0001f612
2016-10-24
18:35:49, Mon
OUTBOX
Going to go talk to Hit me here.
2016-10-24
18:36:52, Mon
INBOX
Rgr. On the IA? ? 1 have info on the first.
2016-10-24
18:47:14, Mon
OUTBOX
The second. Have more Qs for you too.
2016-10-24
19:16:04, Mon
INBOX
Need to talk to you alone before 345
2016-10-25
00:46:57, Tue
OUTBOX
1 hate this case, \uoooif62i
2016-10-25
00:54:08, Tue
OUTBOX
Nothing more. Just all of it.
2016-10-25
00:55:02, Tue
OUTBOX
1 asked Jim and Trisha to meet tomorrow morning. Please let me
just meet with them alone. Please.
2016-10-25
00:59:55, Tue
INBOX
Sure
2016-10-25
01:00:51, Tue
INBOX
I'm still angry at them over this stupid
2016-10-25
01:01:23, Tue
OUTBOX
But I thought our ogc had your back?
2016-10-25
01:03:09, Tue
INBOX
Whatever. Did get a warm fuzy from Trisha. A little too reticent to
say DOD was WAY out of line
2016-10-25
01:04:34, Tue
INBOX
Too much to explain here. \n\nJim and Trisha talking about
shielding the one / any 302s?
2016-10-25
01:05:38, Tue
OUTBOX
1 haven’t talked to them about it at all. Didn't want to go into it
here.
2016-10-25
01:15:30, Tue
OUTBOX
Hey George T called me tonight about the mye letter they are
getting ready to send out. Remind me 1 need to ask you something.
Tomorrow is fine.
133
DOJ-PROD-0000299
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-10-25
01:15:49, Tue
INBOX
Np. Just cranky at them for bad choices about
|HH
INBOX
Letter to who? And sure. You can also imsg me
2016-10-25
01:17:02, Tue
OUTBOX .
Congress. Too hard to write.
2016-10-25
01:18:34, Tue
INBOX
Got it. F them.
2016-10-25
01:20:09, Tue
OUTBOX
Got the email. That's great. Let me get as much as 1 can to tell dd
tomorrow, at least give him some good news.
2016-10-25
01:21:50, Tue
INBOX
Ok, though we have prebrief (maybe) at 10?
2016-10-25
01:22:15, Tue
OUTBOX
Whenever works.
2016-10-25
01:22:27, Tue
OUTBOX
And not critical. Just something to distract.
2016-10-25
01:47:05, Tue
OUTBOX
Thanks for the note to Andy, \u2764
2016-10-25
01:56:23, Tue
Ok, no?
2016-10-25
08:32:12, Tue
OUTBOX
Christ. Make sure you scroll down and read that guy's comment
about the polls.\n\nDonald Trump Dismisses Latest Accuser:
\u2018Oh, I\u2019m Sure She\u2019s Never Been Grabbed
Before\u2019 httn://nvti.ms/2evZhVL
2016-10-25
11:34:46, Tue
INBOX
Oh, I'm calling High Confidence.\n\nl am soooo late. Just sent Bob
an email that I'd be late. \U0001f612
2016-10-25
11:36:12, Tue
OUTBOX
Why so late?
2016-10-25
11:55:09, Tue
INBOX
So Andy didn't respond. ..I'm sure busy /full mailbox/maybe not
wanting email trail...still, have a tiny concern he took it poorly.
Please let me know if you hear anything along those lines
2016-10-25
11:56:11, Tue
OUTBOX
Of course 1 will. I'm sure he did not.
2016-10-25
12:57:56, Tue
INBOX
Remind me to tell you my slightly cranky at Trisha yesterday story
2016-10-25
16:11:39, Tue
OUTBOX
stood me.up!
2016-10-25
18:10:58, Tue
OUTBOX
And 1 officially just asked my boss about London. He's good.
\U0001f60a
2016-10-25
18:11:25, Tue
INBOX
Were you with him when he called Bill? I was here....
2016-10-25
21:37:53, Tue
OUTBOX
Hey, you should not wait. I caught randy, he 100% wants and
cd there. Now waiting for andy.
2016-10-25
21:55:53, Tue
OUTBOX
I'm with andy and kortan.
2016-10-25
23:29:33, Tue
INBOX
Was talking to Bill, rehashed rehashed the the whole cyber ddpi
talk. Looked at their (horrible ) slides
134
DOJ-PROD-0000300
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-10-25 INBOX
23:29:51, Tue _
2016-10-25 INBOX
23:30:39, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-10-25
23:32: 30, Tue_
2016-10-25
23:33:03, Tue
2016-10-25
23:33:47, Tue
2016-10-25
23:34:18, Tue
2016-10-26
11:24:10, Wed
2016-10-26
11:25:34, Wed
2016-10-26
11: 29:47, Wed
2016-10-26
11:30:03, Wed
2016-10-26
11:39:00, Wed
2016-10-26
11:56:34, Wed
2016-10-26
13:06:46, Wed
2016-10-26
13:13:47, Wed
2016-10-26
14:37:04, Wed
2016-10-26
14:37:29, Wed_
2016-10-26
14:37:42, Wed
2016-10-26
15:37:00, Wed
2016-10-26
19:21:46, Wed
2016-10-26
20:31:29, Wed
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
IlNBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
\U0001f636 well, yay!
He didn't mention th
us he wanted to go?
You jon
brief tomorrow - did he tell you who of
Cool. \n\nAnd I just blocked out London on my calendar.
\U0001f60a\UOQ01f60a\U0001f60a\UQQ01f60a _
So should I officially have move my trip?
I need to tell Bill
But yes, let me get confirmation from legat Brits can do it, and if
so, then l would
And you, egging Jon on...you knew I had those dates! ;)
Wasn't thinking about it when I emailed, still had a foggy brain.
What Drives Donald Trump? Fear of Losing Status, Tapes Show
http://nyti.ms/2eHQZJs_ _
I see. I only caught the last 30 seconds or so.
Let's talk about this later.\n\n\u2018We Need to Clean This
Up\u2019: Clinton Aide\u2019s Newly Public Email Shows Concern
http://nvti.ms/2dG6zal
It's true! Plus, you were playing all too col for school.
\U0D01f60a\n\nYeah, I saw that...happy to discuss.
Stupid CIRG amateur hour
Hit piece on Andy from VA GOP in Hampton newspaper
That sucks. I can talk btw.
I'm here. Talking to
Your office?
Can/should I stop by?
Walking back now.
Hey sorry. Was in with andy, now talking WITH I missed the
call, right?_ _ _
Got it. Bill moved wrap to 430 but he's late
135
DOJ-PROD-0000301
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-10-26
INBOX
..|
20:40:10, Wed
■2
|
2016-10-26
21:50:15, Wed
OUTBOX
Gotta go check scion
2016-10-26
22:03:00, Wed
OUTBOX
Okay, I'm going to leave now. Call you from the car to talk about
Chaffetz and current issue.
2016-10-26
22:37:45, Wed
INBOX
Don't forget we have chat with Bill tomorrow at 10
(same time Jason proposed)
2016-10-26
23:37:56, Wed
INBOX
Sigh \n\nLike going tdy to head up
2016-10-26
23:38:56, Wed
OUTBOX
Wow, really? That's news to me.
2016-10-26
23:43:55, Wed
OUTBOX
It's not that exactly. Long story, but we're in a real bind re the
And plus, if it's fust tdy...
2016-10-26
INBOX
Bill went through the open to the community bit. But not
23:45:17, Wed
'
?
2016-10-26
23:46:15, Wed
INBOX
1 shouldn't complain, 1 guess, if it ultimately opens
2016-10-26
OUTBOX
Beats me. But why are you complaining?
23:46:20, Wed
Plus just tdy, right?
2016-10-26
23:46:37, Wed
OUTBOX
It's not good for you to have wfo open now.
2016-10-26
23:49:06, Wed
INBOX
Just grumbling. Because should be tdying in hrd or training
or something. Just don’t think much of him....
2016-10-26
23:50:43, Wed
INBOX
So. What made you cranky? Was it not seeing Andy/Ericy
stuff? Something at wrap? \n\nOr just because, no reason needed?
2016-10-26
OUTBOX
First your overshare re Andy with George, then coming home and
23:53:05, Wed
, yeah,just
everything.
2016-10-27
00:00:00, Thu
INBOX
And i hooe you really dont see that as an overshare. Intention was
to say we're moving it quickly. Truly it's minor - don't think it's
somethig George wouldn't find out, and don't think it slow rolls
them. I’ll keep up the pressure. \n\nThe others stink, no question
about it. I'm sorry
2016-10-27
00:06:05, Thu
INBOX
.
auyui i m Jim i v
Interesting - one of the Podesta emails talks about him hosting
Peter Kadzik at his house for dinner in Oct, 2015. And in May, 2015,
ijiiiSmQ asked Podesta for a job on the campaign
2016-10-27
00:16:55, Thu
OUTBOX
Sorry, was on with andy, now have to deal with Brb.
2016-10-27
00:18:58, Thu
OUTBOX
Hey, guess what. We're going to have a mye exam meeting
tomorrow. Like old times...
2016-10-27
00:25:57, Thu
INBOX
Holy moly. Who?
136
DOJ-PROD-0000302
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-10-27
00:26:40, Thu
INBOX
Was talking with Jen. Picking our SCs. I'm glad she got the job.
2016-10-27
00:26:54, Thu
OUTBOX
Announced today?
OUTBOX
The whole band! We're back on tour!
2016-10-27
00:29:59, Thu
INBOX
Not announced, but they all know. Calls actually happened
yesterday.\n\nAnd 1 feel (hopefully don't look as old) like Keith
Richards. Andy joining via call? There's nothing classified....
2016-10-27
00:30:48, Thu
OUTBOX
Yes, he is.
2016-10-27
00:31:03, Thu
OUTBOX
Good. 1 saw her today, but didn't say anything.
2016-10-27
00:33:52, Thu
INBOX
Woohoo! It’s a Banner Day. What special occasion outfit should 1
wear? ;)
2016-10-27
00:35:15, Thu
OUTBOX
No idea. But 1 did just realize that we all should have dressed up as
classified emails for halloween.
2016-10-27
00:46:03, Thu
INBOX
Or blackberries. Or B1 redactions. Or sketchy big brown shaddy shit
2016-10-27
00:51:22, Thu
OUTBOX
That would be one needy halloween party.
2016-10-27
00:51:30, Thu
OUTBOX
Nerdy, not needy.
2016-10-27
09:33:52, Thu
OUTBOX
Buckle in...\n\nDonations to Foundation Vexed Hillary
Clinton\u2019s Aides, Emails Show http://nyti.ms/2dK7eYx
2016-10-27
INBOX
m
10:06:39, Thu
\ Reading the article you sent
2016-10-27
10:45:07, Thu
INBOX
But, meetings! \n\nYou locked in for lunches today and tomorrow?
wants to meet, can either do a 30 minute coffee or
lunch.
2016-10-27
10:45:56, Thu
OUTBOX
Today is i, tomorrow is trisha, so yes, 1 think so.
2016-10-27
10:47:21, Thu
INBOX
Sigh. Hopefully Trisha has something come up ..tomorrow would
be an EXCELLENT day to get out
2016-10-27
14:26:02, Thu
OUTBOX
1 obviously don't have to tell you how completely INFURIATED 1 am
with Jim right now.
2016-10-27
14:42:59, Thu
OUTBOX
Did come up in any substantive way?
2016-10-27
15:12:47, Thu
INBOX
No, Will stop by with
2016-10-27
15:13:01, Thu
OUTBOX
Shocking.
2016-10-27
INBOX
_ . ....■
15:59:34, Thu
Need to make a call to Toscas at 1:05.
2016-10-27
16:21:41, Thu
OUTBOX
In with kortan now.
137
DOJ-PROD-0000303
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-10-27
16:25:15, Thu
INBOX
Just spoke with JB...he relayed your convo...
/
2016-10-27
16:33:42, Thu
INBOX
D is going to call Andy, we should talk before then. Have you talked
with Andy, particularly w/r/t what JB subsequently told me?
2016-10-27
16:36:11, Thu
OUTBOX
He already did.
2016-10-27
16:38:06, Thu
INBOX
JB told me there was no requirement to recuse you, that is was
optics,we went round and round playing that out.
2016-10-27
18:03:22, Thu
OUTBOX
Please, let's figure out what it is we HAVE first. What if we can't
make out PC? Then we have no further investigative step.
2016-10-27
18:05:29, Thu
INBOX
Agreed
2016-10-27
18:25:56, Thu
OUTBOX
Going to the seif, brb, in case you come by.
2016-10-27
19:01:23, Thu
INBOX
I've got a 345 with Bill...
2016-10-27
20:38:14, Thu
INBOX
K. There's stuff from discussion today we haven't covered but you
have the big stuff. Will think and write down anything else
2016-10-27
21:08:18, Thu
INBOX
God 1 am aggravated. Call me...now have a 530 re-group.
2016-10-27
21:08:58, Thu
OUTBOX
On with Devlin still.
2016-10-27
21:09:48, Thu
INBOX
Hope it's going well...
OUTBOX
I'm done.
2016-10-27
21:30:44, Thu
INBOX
I'm 20 feet from you and this feels unnatural.
2016-10-27
21:31:09, Thu
OUTBOX
I just walked in on Jim to force the issue. Me: "I’m not recused, but
I'm not sitting in on this meeting."
2016-10-27
21:31:19, Thu
OUTBOX
He told me to just go chill out for a while, so that's what I'm doing.
2016-10-27
21:33:01, Thu
INBOX
That's good advice. Kg^gSSSSiiB^IFf^
2016-10-27
22:32:14, Thu
INBOX
in the hallway with everyone incl Jason, just thinking he's going to
try and stop by
2016-10-27
22:33:39, Thu
OUTBOX
You should not come by. We should talk by phone.
2016-10-28
00:18:45, Fri
INBOX
Do you have George's cell?
2016-10-28
02:09:04, Fri
INBOX
1 do now kinda love George
2016-10-28
02:10:06, Fri
OUTBOX
Glad to hear it. We should talk before your 7:30. Also sent a couple
of things on gtown.
138
DOJ-PROD-0000304
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-10-28
02:46:34, Fri
INBOX
Of course. Let me know when. I'll be driving in by 7.\n\nStill
conference calling, 1:15 in...
2016-10-28
03:11:49, Fri
OUTBOX
Conference call with whom? This late?
2016-10-28
03:13:23, Fri
INBOX
George David |^Jon \n\nYes. \n\n Many feelings.
\U0001f612
2016-10-28
07:50:42, Fri
OUTBOX
Any plan to tell the case agents? You know, since so much of this
has hinged on the credibility of "the team." \U0001f621
2016-10-28
14:11:26, Fri
INBOX
Never mind Conf call now
2016-10-28
14:31:36, Fri
OUTBOX
Frankly didn’t want to. 1 don't need to be privy when 1 had no role
in the decision.
2016-10-28
14:47:09, Fri
OUTBOX
1 cancelled lunch with Trisha. I'm in no mood.
2016-10-28
17:19:06, Fri
OUTBOX
Still on with devlin. Mike's phone is ON FIRE.
2016-10-28
17:19:38, Fri
INBOX
It's on news
2016-10-28
17:29:58, Fri
INBOX
You may wanna tell Devlin he should turn on CNN , there's news
going on; (
2016-10-28
17:30:13, Fri
INBOX
Sorry;)
2016-10-28
17:30:17, Fri
OUTBOX
He knows. He just got handed a note.
2016-10-28
INBOX
Ha. He asking about it now?
17:33:54, Fri
2016-10-28
17:34:44, Fri
OUTBOX
Yeah. It was pretty funny. Coming now.
2016-10-28
19:24:48, Fri
INBOX
News picked up Weiner source
2016-10-28
22:02:21, Fri
OUTBOX
Christ. It's there led on freaking MARKETPLACE.
2016-10-28
22:27:32, Fri
OUTBOX
Rybicki just called to check in. He very clearly 100% believes that
Andy should be recused because of the "perception."
2016-10-28
22:30:57, Fri
INBOX
God. \U0001f621
2016-10-28
22:34:58, Fri
OUTBOX
Our statement affected the stock market. \U0001f621
2016-10-29
00:52:04, Sat
OUTBOX
Don't understand your email, if it's a matter similar to those we've
been talking about lately, why no recusal before? Something
different?
2016-10-29
01:21:48, Sat
INBOX
1 assume McAuliffe picked up. But that doesn't make sense.
\n\nHe said he was interviewing, maybe he's headed into private
sector?
2016-10-29
02:05:35, Sat
INBOX
Talking to
2016-10-29
02:06:47, Sat
INBOX
Can talk if you want. Not that that would make any sense.
139
DOJ-PROD-0000305
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-10-29
12:31:53, Sat
INBOX
About to hop on phone with and Jon
2016-10-29
15:33:41, Sat
Thbtbtbtbt. Can you work talk?
mm
OUTBOX
No. Going to brunch with 1 might miss the 1.
2016-10-29
15:44:11, Sat
INBOX
Oof. Hope you dont...actually, check that. I.hooe you have a nice
time/break. I will fill you in if you miss it. Remind me later then
about my convo with NYO
2016-10-29
18:32:46, Sat
OUTBOX
Hey is there a way to find out from sioc which numbers called in to
the call? I’m concerned about all the beeps. I'm sure between the
two of us, we could figure out what number folks were using.
2016-10-29
18:41:22, Sat
INBOX
Good thought. I'll ask.
2016-10-29
19:04:34, Sat
INBOX
Set up tomorrow for 12 people. Please check my math on that....
2016-10-29
19:11:40, Sat
INBOX
And they cannot see the number for who dialed in
2016-10-30
00:00:26, Sun
INBOX
K. About to eat, so good timing. 1 will set away to review affidavit
afterwards.
2016-10-30
00:00:44, Sun
OUTBOX
Have you sent it around yet?
2016-10-30
00:29:27, Sun
INBOX
1 did! You got it from me, right?
2016-10-30
00:57:39, Sun
INBOX
Hi. Excused myself from the table to read it. Have you looked at it?
2016-10-30
00:58:57, Sun
OUTBOX
2016-10-30
01:31:39, Sun
INBOX
In a basement study by myself working. \U0001f612\n\nSee, e.g.,
the email in just sent JB.
2016-10-30
INBOX
Going back up now to join the group...
04:03:27, Sun
2016-10-30
OUTBOX
I’m sorry. There’s no way you could have planned for any of this...
04:04:2 3, Sun
2016-10-30
04:05:45, Sun
INBOX
What are you doing up? I'm red lining. Want me to.forward to you?
It's sure to.put you back to sleep
2016-10-30
04:14:25, Sun
OUTBOX
And god, poor
■
Seems like she's been working the entire day.
2016-10-30
13:50:53, Sun
INBOX
This is all Matt\n\nJustice officials warned FBI that Comey\u2019s
decision to update Congress was not consistent with department
policy - The Washington
Post\nhttps://www.washingtonpost.com/world/nationai-
security/justice-officials-warned-fbi-that-comeys-decision-to-
update-congress-was-not-consistent-with-department-
policy/2016/10/29/cbl79254-9de7-lle6-b3c9-
f662adaa0048_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-
main rarnnaignnrint.Rlflnm^^ahfVY'Pnjgomrctnn/_
140
DOJ-PROD-0000306
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-10-30
13:56:06, Sun
OUTBOX
Yeah, 1 saw it. Makes me feel WAY less bad about throwing him
under the bus in the forthcoming article.
2016-10-30
INBOX
Yep the whole tone is anti Bu. Just a tiny bit from us. And serves
13:57:24, Sun
him right. He's gonna be pissed....
2016-10-30
INBOX
■
15:10:36, Sun
I'm heading in to JEH now
2016-10-30
OUTBOX
You going to ny?
15:11:41, Sun
2016-10-30
INBOX
No. Can review from here. From my office, even.'
15:17:55, Sun
2016-10-30
17:27:31, Sun
OUTBOX
An article to share: FBI agents knew of Clinton-related emails
weeks before director was briefed\nFBI agents knew of Clinton-
related emails weeks before director was
briefed\nhttp://waDo.st/2f2EhEO
2016-10-30
18:32:07, Sun
OUTBOX
Okay now I'm getting angry.
2016-10-30
19:06:48, Sun
INBOX
What - Dave's opening comments?
2016-10-30
19:30:47, Sun
OUTBOX
Sorry, utterly terrible day. I'm not sure 1 can identify one single
redeeming thing about it.
2016-10-30
19:49:27, Sun
INBOX
Oh god I'm sorry\n\nTalked to Bill he's leaning not telling
Bill,he was going to call Baker. We need that Kortan info go to
weigh in the decision.
2016-10-30
20:39:03, Sun
INBOX
Oh God. I'm sorry. Stupid f*cking election.
2016-10-30
21:13:57, Sun
INBOX
2016-10-30
21:14:45, Sun
OUTBOX
The bureau honestly doesn't deserve us.
141
DOJ-PROD-0000307
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-10-30
21:15:28, Sun
INBOX
As long as you'll hire me in 3 years, I'm fine....
2016-10-30
OUTBOX I'm
21:18:17, Sun
concerned that there will surely be a holdover after the 9, if that's
the case, 1 want to be there.
2016-10-30
OUTBOX
21:18:31, Sun
2016-10-30
21:19:37, Sun
OUTBOX
God, I'm so incredibly furious. 1 would just walk out and if 1 had
anywhere to go. Let him deal with everything.
2016-10-30
21:26:07, Sun
INBOX
Yeah 1 think it would be helpful to have you here. will be, too
(I think).
2016-10-30
21:26:28, Sun
OUTBOX
For morning meeting?
2016-10-30
21:26:59, Sun
INBOX
You want to talk about it? 1 can imsg...
2016-10-30
21:27:26, Sun
INBOX
No, standing by after that’s done in case they want to talk about it
then
2016-10-30
21:30:33, Sun
INBOX
You can come hang out in 4012 with me and ...\n\nl
have remnants of Qdoba chips and salsa....
2016-10-30
22:11:22, Sun
INBOX
told doj we have at least one classified. 1 left a vague vm for
2016-10-30
22:38:59, Sun
INBOX
Connected w/ George
2016-10-30
23:06:03, Sun
INBOX
Great fcking nyt...
2016-10-30
23:09:31, Sun
INBOX
You saw the authors. ...what that even means anymore, I don't
know
2016-10-31
00:38:32, Mon
OUTBOX
Oh, but DB wants to be able to show he's Doing Something.
\U0001f621
2016-10-31
00:53:02, Mon
INBOX
Yeah, 1 thought so. \n\nOk. 1 need to call Bryan at WFO (was talking
with and when he called earlier). Let me knock that out and will
text here after that
2016-10-31
15:04:05, Mon
INBOX
Headed into 11..-Bill stressed
2016-10-31
16:03:06, Mon
OUTBOX
Can't WITH j |i.
2016-10-31
16:05:28, Mon
INBOX
Any idea how it went? Not sure source of his info, but bill thought
Andy adamant he wouldn't.
2016-10-31
16:54:13, Mon
INBOX
K. Bill said Andy mentioned pushing mye until tomorrow.
2016-10-31
17:17:11, Mon
OUTBOX
That's the tentative plan.
2016-10-31
18:33:34, Mon
OUTBOX
Hey there. Want to meet with bill now or 4 better? Will need to
leave right after if we keep it at 4
2016-10-31
INBOX
22:07:15, Mon
2016-10-31
23:43:55, Mon
INBOX
Hoo boy. Just talked to Lou. Remind me....
142
DOJ-PROD-0000308
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-11-01
00:14:54, Tue
OUTBOX
Great. Can't wait to hear his thoughts.
2016-11-01
00:16:25, Tue
INBOX
Oh, it wasn't his thoughts (though he supports Andy, btw) - its who
and what people said/asked him.'
2016-11-01
00:16:49, Tue
INBOX
And remind me Bills comments about Mike vs Randy response this
morning....
2016-11-01
00:17:02, Tue
2016-11-01
00:17:42, Tue
OUTBOX
1 want to know now. This is kind of sh*tty of you to hang out there.
OUTBOX
Did you see the times this evening? Another Apuzzo/Schmidt
special, all about the damn review process.
2016-11-01 '
00:18:50, Tue
INBOX
Sorry. \n\nAnd no...\U0001f621
2016-11-01
00:19:28, Tue
OUTBOX
You seriously can't tell me now? \U0001f612
2016-11-01
00:19:56, Tue
INBOX
Not on this. Imsg in a bit?
2016-11-01
00:20:16, Tue
2016-11-01
00:20:47, Tue
OUTBOX
You can't just talk?
What's the article? I'm not in the cool kids club who gets a
notification
2016-11-01
00:49:18, Tue
INBOX
Did you read the MJ article?!?!?!?
INBOX
I'm sorry. \U0001f614\n\nThe article isn't nearly as important,
obviously, but it's depression....
2016-11-01
13:06:23, Tue
INBOX
Hey have to go to meeting with Jon right now
2016-11-01
13:09:07, Tue
OUTBOX
I'm on with Sorry.
2016-11-01
INBOX
13:21:02, Tue
2016-11-01
16:57:29, Tue
OUTBOX
Just leaving his ofc now. He's going down to talk to the boss. It's
not looking good.
2016-11-01
18:11:09, Tue
INBOX
Hey done. You around? Bill shared Andy's email
2016-11-01
18:11:39, Tue
OUTBOX
I'm waiting outside his ofc.
2016-11-01
18:29:15, Tue
INBOX
K. Let me know when you're free
2016-11-01
21:50:57, Tue
INBOX
Hey Bill wants to talk so I'm going to be out. He said it wouldn't
take long but Dina and Jen will join so 1 truly have no idea. \n\nFor
sure will be here until a little after 6. Call my desk if you want after
that. I'll use it as an excuse to get up
2016-11-01 OUTBOX I'm sorry just got out. Lots to share.
22:02:58, Tue_____
143
DOJ-PROD-0000309
Strzok-Paee Texts
2016-11-01
23:05:28, Tue
INBOX
•
Figured out why they legally can't do what you just said. We are
comparing against material (to determine what is new) that we
obtained during the investigation that we cannot share with them.
2016-11-01
23:05:31, Tue
INBOX
Oh hey! Did you realize we affirmatively tweeted about the release
of the wjc foundation? Yup! Let's take out the highlighter....
2016-11-01
23:25:15, Tue
OUTBOX
Yes! 1 heard about it at wrap. Utter complete disaster.
2016-11-01
23:27:04, Tue
INBOX
1 mean, wtf?!?!?\n\nWe're getting crucified in the news. We
should have waited. Did JR or anyone weigh in?
2016-11-01
23:27:59, Tue
OUTBOX
It was automatic. They got it back up and running two days ago.
\U0001f612
2016-11-01
23:28:55, Tue
OUTBOX
I'll explain when we talk.
2016-11-01
23:29:10, Tue
OUTBOX
Oh and ruemmler called Jim b...
2016-11-02
00:29:32, Wed
INBOX
See email 1 just sent. Recommend you let the request (whatever
form it ended up taking) trickle down, ther and i will address
2016-11-02
00:31:35, Wed
INBOX
You CANNOT source me
2016-11-02
00:35:30, Wed
OUTBOX
1 will. This makes me VERY angry.
2016-11-02
00:35:54, Wed
INBOX
Well, Jon and 1 agree
2016-11-02
00:36:23, Wed
OUTBOX
Yeah, wtf is Bill and Randy's plan?
2016-11-02
00:37:09, Wed
INBOX
Like 1 said, see Jon and ny convo....
2016-11-02
00:38:02, Wed
INBOX
And honestly, the other thing I'm thinking about? "The cat's
away...."
2016-11-02
00:45:44, Wed
INBOX
This response, from Jon:\n...and considering we haven't shared any
facts, those certainly aren't factoring into decisionmaking. We
should essentially have no reason for contact with NYO going
forward in this.
2016-11-02
00:46:17, Wed
OUTBOX
1 know. Which is what 1 tried to impose.
2016-11-02
00:47:03, Wed
OUTBOX
God, this makes me very very angry. 1 honestly think 1 should bow
out rather than find out things, be unable to tell Andy, and
powerless to stop them.
2016-11-02
00:48:24, Wed
INBOX
No. Need you on the inside now more than ever. Truly. And no bs,
your country needs you now. \n\nWe are going to have to be very
wise about all of this.
2016-11-02
INBOX
The only thing wrong in your statement is your powerlessness
00:49:01, Wed __
2016-11-02 OUTBOX I am going to have to use Jim Baker a lot to get to the D. But I don't
00:49:09, Wed_trust that he can convey details accurately!_
144
DOJ-PROD-0000310
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-11-02
00:49:27, Wed
OUTBOX
I'm not sure 1 agree with you there.
2016-11-02
00:50:14, Wed
INBOX
Not just JB. And this is a finite thing. 1 want to be done before the
inauguration.
2016-11-02
00:50:45, Wed
INBOX
You’re wrong. Not the type of power you (or i) would prefer, but
not powerless
2016-11-02
00:50:47, Wed
OUTBOX
Who else can 1 use?
2016-11-02
00:51:02, Wed
OUTBOX
JR? Don't think so.
2016-11-02
00:53:41, Wed
INBOX
I don't know. Trisha (to Mike) \n\n And not just you. Me,
Jon. \n\nMe? Randy. My QT roommate.
2016-11-02
00:56:32, Wed
INBOX
We're going to make sure the right thing is done. \n\nYou
underestimate my - our - enthusiasm and competence and
motivation. \n\nYou can be worried. Take strength from me. Then
add Jon and and Bill and Jim onto that. It's gonna be ok
2016-11-02
00:57:54, Wed
OUTBOX
I know that you guys are. 1 have complete confidence in the team.
You know that.
2016-11-02
01:02:14, Wed
INBOX ,
Our team.\n\nl do. I'm telling you to take comfort in that.
2016-11-02
01:06:21, Wed
OUTBOX
1 just don't know.
2016-11-02
01:07:00, Wed
OUTBOX
And god, 1 just had a horrible realization: what if 1 can’t talk to Andy
about my back and forth about what to do?!
2016-11-02
01:07:33, Wed
INBOX
? What do you mean?
2016-11-02
01:08:52, Wed
OUTBOX
Baker said to me tonight that if Bowdich or Steinbach come to him
about the leadership decision that he shouldn't discuss it with
them because once he is out he shouldn't have discussions about
anyiof it, even personnel.
2016-11-02
01:09:24, Wed
OUTBOX
Pete, 1 really think this isn't a good idea for me.
2016-11-02
01:13:31, Wed
INBOX
lisa. The more 1 think about it, the more certain 1 am that it is.
2016-11-02
01:14:16, Wed
INBOX
Your conversations with Andy would be covered under atty
privilege, no?
2016-11-02
01:14:53, Wed
OUTBOX
As 1 said to you the other day, and 1 meant, my country just might
have to do without this time. 1 mean it.
2016-11-02
01:15:09, Wed
OUTBOX.
I'm not sure I'm following your second.
2016-11-02
01:15:49, Wed
INBOX
Stop it\n\nYes, but give me 5
2016-11-02
01:16:29, Wed
OUTBOX
Jesus. Another article pushed by nyt on this.
2016-11-02
01:19:03, Wed
OUTBOX
Richman is a friend of Comey and baker. \U0001f612
145
DOJ-PROD-0000311
Strzok-Page Texts
INBOX
Bill told Randy no.
INBOX
1:) yay Bill
OUTBOX
No. Herring here. Stand by.
2016-11-02
21:04:40, Wed
INBOX
Hey big dummy you were supposed to stop by and unlock you
computer so 1 could finish self assessment. ...\U0001f60a
2016-11-02
21:24:41, Wed
OUTBOX
I went back to back with mtg with andy to wrap.
2016-11-02
21:27:11, Wed
INBOX
■
Btw it took me staring at Kortan to out the info about the nyt
\n\nAlso remind me re
2016-11-02
21:27:17, Wed
INBOX
2016-11-02
21:27:44, Wed
OUTBOX
Huh? Not following your kortan comment. Talk to you later about
it.
2016-11-02
21:28:34, Wed
OUTBOX
Gotta go back to kortan.
2016-11-02
21:30:33, Wed
OUTBOX
Do you know how to get a cached copy of the version of the article
the times pushed out last night re Manafort and foundation?
2016-11-02
21:31:45, Wed
INBOX
How do you mean? An old version, or without showing current
interest in nyt
2016-11-02
21:32:20, Wed
2016-11-02
21 :34:07, Wed
2016-11-02
21:38:52, W ed
2016-11-02
21:45:47, Wed
2016-11-02
23:48:4 1, Wed
2016-'
OUTBOX
UNBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
2016-11-03
00:02:10, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-11-03
00:03:08, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-11-03
00:08:03, Thu
INBOX
2016-11-03
00:15:15, Thu
OUTBOX
2016-11-03
00:24:53, Thu
OUTBOX
Yes. They changed the article dramatically after kortan called, we
want to see the old version. _
Hmm. I don't know. Talking with Jon and Bill in hallway let me
know when you're done _ _
Who's the byline? Let me do some looking
Coming back now. Apuzzo plus his buds.
Getting Mangialardos for nextTues' meeting:..and cancelling^1 1
think. ___
called, left a msg...
Yeah, bill and to scare talked about getting subs.
I suppose I'm okay with cancelling bob. Just this once.
Bill just called to say George called Bill for an update. Bill tap
danced without saying anything. George proposed I update
twice a day. \U0001f612\n\nl told Bill to mention at the meeting
tomorrow and come up with an answer. _
Also a dad is not updating twice a day. Thanks, but no.
Also, we are going to have to share with DOJ. There’s already not a
iot of trust here, and let's face it, and George are not the
roblems.
146
DOJ-PROD-0000312
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-11-03 i
00:26:08, Thu j
INBOX
lAnd no, it's not. I'm not sure
anyone should be \n\nl agree with you. When we do it matters,
though, and in what detail.
2016-11-03
00:26:54, Thu !
OUTBOX
1 agree. But how much we've gone through and what we've found
seems reasonable.
2016-11-03
00:31:32, Thu
INBOX
1 may have to short someone so as to give Andy and the Director
one.
INBOX
I'm sure if Dave (or Mike) sees it the Q will be why not them, too.
stupid politics.
mm
INBOX
Or get it for my original plan and do the kiss ass chain of command
plan later.
2016-11-03
00:50:57, Thu
OUTBOX
Sorry. Rybicki called. Time line article in the post is super specific
and not good. Doesn't make sense because 1 didn't have specific
information to give.
2016-11-03
00:55:50, Thu
INBOX
What post article?!?
2016-11-03
00:56:28, Thu
OUTBOX
Just went up. WaPo.
2016-11-03
00:57:08, Thu
INBOX
Goddamn bills opaque comments.
2016-11-03
00:57:36, Thu
OUTBOX
Call you?
2016-11-03
00:57:45, Thu
INBOX
Can 1 send to team?
2016-11-03 OUTBOX
Yes
Okay I can talk again.
Need to talk to you when you're done
I'm done. But rybicki may call back. But I can talk now.
I hate this case.
01:59:36, Thu
2016-11-03
02:26:42, Thu
OUTBOX
Sorry, on with rybicki again. Email incoming from him.
2016-11-03
02:39:40, Thu
INBOX
To me? Didn’t get it.
2016-11-03
02:40:01, Thu
OUTBOX
You should. Maybe he will in the am.
OUTBOX
Also you can imsg but 1 might not be able to respond.
2016-11-03
02:42:27, Thu
INBOX
I didn't. Whatever is fine. I'll imsg in a sec, need to work out timing.
2016-11-03
02:43:12, Thu
OUTBOX
it is coming.
2016-11-03
02:49:28, Thu
OUTBOX
Ok 1 should be able to when you are free.
147
DOJ-PROD-0000313
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-11-03
02:55:34, Thu
INBOX
Ok so obviously 1 want the background on the email
2016-11-03
03:18:53, Thu
INBOX
And dammit 1 specifically ASKED for guidance about what and to
WHOM we tell DoJ
2016-11-03
03:47:54, Thu
INBOX
iBill talked to George well before
Jim's email. DoJ is hyperventilating 1 want to talk!!!!
2016-11-03
10:00:48, Thu
OUTBOX
You guys didn't do anything wrong. Just say the D wanted to think
about it.
2016-11-03
10:15:36, Thu
INBOX
Well, it's a little more than that. Bill did talk to George. 1 guess he
didn't tell him much, but still. Anyway.
2016-11-03
10:28:29, Thu
OUTBOX
1 know it's a little more than that. I'm just saying now that we are
going to do regular updates just say that.
2016-11-03
10:36:52, Thu
INBOX
What did Rybicki have to say?
2016-11-03
10:37:14, Thu
OUTBOX
Will tell you later.
2016-11-03
10:37:41, Thu
INBOX
K. Stuff to tell you later, too
2016-11-03
11:29:41, Thu
OUTBOX
The nyt probability numbers are dropping every day. I'm scared for
our organization.
2016-11-03
11:30:50, Thu
INBOX
Was just talking to Bill then Andy called him and he had to get off
2016-11-03
11:32:36, Thu
INBOX
Stein and moron are F'ing everything up, too
2016-11-03
11:40:09, Thu
OUTBOX
Stein?
2016-11-03
11:40:19, Thu
OUTBOX
Oh right.
2016-11-03
11:40:39, Thu
INBOX
Green
2016-11-03
11:45:11, Thu
INBOX
Oh :(\n\nBill wants me to call before 10, which means
now. \U0001f612 Told.him 1 would bow hut that Jon and 1 are too
busy to be producing regular, let alone twice daily updates to a
gsl5. He was fine with that. \n\nFor background, he gave a general
update to George at 615 last night. 1 am certain that's probably not
what was communicated to Rybicki. Bill is feeling defensive about
the email. 1 told him we had done nothing wrong.
2016-11-03
17:05:17, Thu
INBOX
Shhh don't tell anyone, mtg invite is thank you good job calendar
hand out.\U0001f60a\n\nYou back?
2016-11-03
17:24:15, Thu
INBOX
Sigh. Have a 130 with Bill, prob nor enough to stop by. \n\nWe're
doing par after D brief
2016-11-03
23:04:29, Thu
INBOX
Bill said he forwarded, hopefully you were on it; 1 was not. If there
is substantive response /conversation, would appreciate the
feeback.
148
DOJ-PROD-0000314
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-11-03
23:05:21, Thu
2016-11-03
23:13:47, Thu
OUTBOX
Nope. Didn't get anything. That’s irritating. Green side?
INBOX
Yes. If he forwards anything back. I'll add you.
2016-11-03
23:15:44, Thu
2016-11-04
INBOX
Not much to say about it, though.
INBOX
01:27:32, Fri
worry we'll be drafting this damn statement all
day.
2016-11-04
02:02:39, Fri
INBOX
And no 1 don't want to talk anymore. said had called
him, also apparently talked to Jim earlier this week, was going to
call him again tonight. 1 sent an email to Jim to call me for details
about what ces did and didn't tell her. I don't really care at this
point.
2016-11-04
OUTBOX
02:21:57, Fri
We might have this stmt out and be substantially done.
2016-11-04
02:23:21, Fri
OUTBOX
No Pete. It's your JOB. And plus she actually knows what you're
doing this time. And that the American presidential election, and
thus, the state of the world, actually hangs in the balance.
2016-11-04
03:19:04, Fri
OUTBOX
Dude. On Inauguration Day, in addition to our kegger we should
also have a screening of the Weiner documentary! \U0001f60a
2016-11-04
14:03:23, Fri
OUTBOX
I'm sending the dogs, down to the review room in
about 10. Randy's guy, will be with. \U0001f612
Tried to stop that, so maybe just a heads up to but let the rest
of the team be surprised.
2016-11-05
17:22:42, Sat
2016-11-05
20:24:17, Sat
INBOX
I hate this case
INBOX
Ok. \U0Q01f615\n\nArriving work around 5 or so
2016-11-05
22:00:48, Sat
OUTBOX
He had heard. Guy is in custody. Thanks.
2016-11-05
22:20:35, Sat
INBOX
Yeah apparently it's been there since 11
2016-11-05
22:21:11, Sat
INBOX
Guess we're not so good at the paint scrubbing thing. Or, maybe,
you know, tape some trash bags over it or something
2016-11-05
22:40:45, Sat
INBOX
Jon and I forming the new facilities maintenance branch of the mye
team. Cause we're doing it ALL...
2016-11-05
23:52:38, Sat
OUTBOX
1 don't want to make a statement anymore.
2016-11-05
23:58:39, Sat
INBOX
Oh yeah still here. Here until welre done, review the potential
unique cat Is whenever we're done and report up.\n\nYeah 1 don't
either. We're kind of out of the news cycle, let's leave it that way
2016-11-06
00:39:34, Sun
INBOX
Going through status now. We may be complete reviewing in an
hour.
149
DOJ-PROD-0000315
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-11-06
00:39:59, Sun
INBOX
Jon and I going to look at potentially cat Is
2016-11-06
00:49:05, Sun
OUTBOX
Sorry, I don't think 1 am calling at 10.
2016-11-06
01:10:19, Sun
OUTBOX
Why didn't you tell me all of you would be in this afternoon?
\U0001f612
2016-11-06
01:13:18, Sun
INBOX
A) im really sorry\n\nB) i didn't know we would be. Jon and 1
didn't get in until 5
2016-11-06
02:42:03, Sun
INBOX
Hi. Missed you. No real update. The three of us are going through
the 3k (1000 each) to narrow down so the team can come back
tomorrow earlv and de-dupe
2016-11-06
06:09:20, Sun
INBOX
Finishing up
2016-11-06'
06:34:09, Sun
INBOX
Leaving finally now. Turns our no new classified
2016-11-06
09:23:53, Sun
OUTBOX
.
It was okay.\n\nWhy didn't you tell me that you all were getting
together? Did someone not want me there?
2016-11-06
11:42:25, Sun
INBOX
1 thought I did mention. Jon and 1 were there to get an update and
buy dinner and monitor progress, which evolved as you saw into
very quick progress. arrived at some point in the process.
Certainly no intent to exclude vou.
2016-11-06
INBOX
I didn't know was coming until she was there -■■■■@111
11:44:07, Sun
2016-11-06
12:11:03, Sun
OUTBOX
I still don't know that we should make this statement.
2016-11-06
12:11:41, Sun
INBOX
1 don't either. Imsg?
2016-11-06 INBOX Hey do you want to send that email out suggesting a conference
14:09:05, Sun call? I can if you want but defer to you
2016-11-06
14:15:11, Sun
OUTBOX
1 did at 8:56. Did you not get it?
2016-11-06
14:28:46, Sun
INBOX
1 did. But my phone has stupid 20 minute gaps when it decodes it
needs a break to rest or something
2016-11-06
14:29:21, Sun
INBOX
Add Conf room might be smart if we want to edit whilst we talk
2016-11-06
14:30:55, Sun ,
OUTBOX
I'm having a hard time deciding what is appropriate for a Weekend
With the Director. Have on grey jeans, navy v-neck, tan cardi.
Brown loafers? Brown boots?
2016-11-06
INBOX
14:36:09, Sun .
2016-11-06
14:37:36, Sun
OUTBOX
Sorry I'm very close to being late
150
DOJ-PROD-0000316
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-11-06
14:38:23, Sun
INBOX
Hey, just trying to pass along the substance of a call 1 just had with
Jim.
2016-11-06
14:38:45, Sun
OUTBOX
Will call from car
2016-11-06
14:38:54, Sun
INBOX
And yeah me too. On bridge
2016-11-06
14:42:35, Sun
INBOX
Great ANOTHER fucking road race
2016-11-06
14:54:44, Sun
OUTBOX
Might be about 2 minutes late.
2016-11-06
14:55:47, Sun
INBOX
Rgr. in add Conf room
2016-11-06
18:14:05, Sun
OUTBOX
We're still in the D’s conf room.
2016-11-06
18:15:06, Sun
INBOX .
Nice! D still there? :)
2016-11-06
18:15:52, Sun
INBOX
Would you pis ask Jon to check his email? Q. for him. \n\nThanks
2016-11-06
18:16:26, Sun
OUTBOX
He doesn’t have your phone. Are you done?
2016-11-06
18:16:49, Sun
OUTBOX
Can you come back in here? Are you still on the call?
2016-11-06
18:17:01, Sun
INBOX
No still on call
2016 11-06
18:17:24, Sun
INBOX
Disregard, got answer
2016-11-06
18:26:48, Sun
OUTBOX
We’re watching football in the directors office now. it’s kind of
surreal.
2016-11-06
INBOX
It’s funny 1 see Jim and Jim on the email and feel painfully left out.
19:56:58, Sun
There’s a Bridgewater flaw I need to work on. \U0001f615
2016-11-06
19:58:34, Sun
OUTBOX
That’s probably because they both know that part of his life. Don’t
feel excluded It’s not personal in the least.
2016-11-06
INBOX
20:03:36, Sun
2016-11-06
20:04:34, Sun
OUTBOX
1 know. But you know it’s there, which is the first step to not letting
it conquer you.
2016-11-06
20:30:52, Sun
INBOX
Out on CNN now
2016-11-06
INBOX
And fox
20:31:00, Sun
2016-11-06
20:31:58, Sun
INBOX
1 WANT TO WATCH THIS WITH YOU!
2016-11-06
20:33:54, Sun
INBOX
Trump about to get off his plane
2016-11-06
20:34:43, Sun
INBOX
Going to pour myself a glass of wine...
151
DOJ-PROD-0000317
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-11-06
20:52:54, Sun
OUTBOX
I'm on fox. Trump is talking about her.
2016-11-06
20:53:42, Sun
OUTBOX
He's talking about Cartwright and Petraeus and how they're not
protected. She's protected by a rigged system.
2016-11-07
01:43:03, Mon
OUTBOX
Good lord...\n\nlnside Donald Trump\u2019s Last 5tand: An
Anxious Nominee Seeks Assurance http://nyti.ms/2esuTs3
2016-11-07
08:54:21, Mon
OUTBOX
How Moscow Uses Interpol to Pursue Its Enemies
http://nyti.ms/2edXuGk
2016-11-07
OUTBOX
This was good. Kjjjjlii
09:31:20, Mon
*n\nIs There Life After Trump? http://nyti.ms/2eppNN6
2016-11-07
12:05:34, Mon
INBOX
Was just clearing 8 emails that somehow appeared overnight.
Concerningly, there were several from earlier (ie, 5-ish) that didn't
appear until after 1 last check this around 8
2016-11-07
12:11:13, Mon
INBOX
Ok. 1 have a 930 with the team and a 10 with and^B (1
can do the 10 on the phone)
2016-11-07
INBOX
Ok. I'm going to rush now. Will see if DOJ can call earlier.
12:14:49, Mon
2016-11-07
13:25:48, Mon
INBOX
Once conference call done
2016-11-07
16:01:13, Mon
OUTBOX
Andy asked to meet with me right after my 11; will hit you up
afterwards.
2016-11-07
17:16:26, Mon
OUTBOX
I'm done now too. Need to talk to you about a couple of work
things.
2016-11-07
17:18:12, Mon
INBOX
K. In with Bill. He hoped I went to^^J mtg, told him 1 didn't
know about it but would catch up with you
2016-11-07
17:20:03, Mon
OUTBOX
It's essentially a pissing match btwn ny and Sf. Nothing for cd at
this time. But yes, 1 can describe.
2016-11-07
20:08:32, Mon
OUTBOX
Waiting to meet with DD at 3:30 now. 1 should have gone at lunch.
\U0001f612
2016-11-07
20:11:34, Mon
INBOX
Apparently no...just came up...\n\nTalked to Bill about our convo,
are you Ok for me to reach out to JB to ask to speak about what
you discussed earlier? His thoughts will impact what we do and we
need to move one way or the other
2016-11-07
20:28:34, Mon
INBOX
How long is your 330? Want to try afterwards at 430?
2016-11-07
20:29:16, Mon
OUTBOX
1 have to go sooner than that. 1 probably have to go right after 1 am
done with Andy.
2016-11-07
INBOX
22:17:14, Mon
of providing briefings to the Hill, menioned you two working on
howto approach drafting them tomorrow
2016-11-07
23:06:28, Mon
INBOX
Can you talk work? \U0001f621
2016-11-07
OUTBOX
No 1 really can't.
23:09:44, Mon _._
2016-11-07 INBOX Np. Just JB frustration. It can wait.
23:12:20, Mon_ _
152
DOJ-PROD-0000318
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-11-08
01:32:02, Tue
OUTBOX
Impressive in its accuracy. \U0001f612\n\nHow the F.B.I. Reviewed
Thousands of Emails in One Week http://nyti.ms/2egA2sg
2016-11-08
01:56:33, Tue
INBOX
OMG THIS IS F*CKING TERRIFYING:\nA victory by Mr. Trump
remains possible: Mrs. Clinton\u2019s chance of losing is about the
same as the probability that an N.F.L. kicker misses a 38-yard field
goal.
2016-11-08
02:05:51, Tue
OUTBOX
Yeah, that's not good.
2016-11-08
02:42:03, Tue
INBOX
I'm sorry. Managed to get into a huge fight here about the Bu and
Clinton. Because just can't stop at fair observations. She has to
assert mastery of things about which she has NO knowledge.
2016-11-08
02:43:40, Tue
OUTBOX
She does realize you've been in EVERY conversation that has been
had about this case, right?
2016-11-08
02:44:54, Tue
INBOX
That we should have gone on the record saying Kallstrom and
others are not credible (which may be valid), but then saying we
could pull his tolls if we wanted to. Because she knows all about
our policy regarding investigations of members of the media.
\U0001f621
2016-11-08
02:45:31, Tue
INBOX
Yes. But she's an expert who knows everything. \n\nl'm telling you,
it's wildly infuriating. She has good points but then assumes wildly
impossible understanding of things to make groundless assertions.
2016-11-08
02:46:06, Tue
OUTBOX
Uh, what crime are we investigating?\n\nAnd I'm sorry, that's a
terrible idea. Go to war with the formers?
2016-11-08
02:47:53, Tue
INBOX
Leaking information about ongoing investigations. Which is
incorrect information. By agents who don't know about things
talking to him. \n\nSee? That's the thing. Her initial point, that we
should have gone after the agents talking harder and sooner, is not
unreasonable. But the subsequent discussion falls into uninformed
assertions.
2016-11-08
02:49:08, Tue
OUTBOX
If it's not classified, what's the crime though?
2016-11-08 '
02:49:26, Tue
INBOX
Maybe we should go to war with them, if they're spouting bile like
Kallstrom. He's really out of bounds. That is a valid debate. Talking -
telling - me how we should have done it is what’s infuriating.
2016-11-08
02:50:35, Tue
INBOX
There's not a crime. So you publicly shame or disavow him. And
you find out who's talking to him and go after them with opr. It's a
legitimate criticism that we might have looked sooner at all these
oeoole running their mouths to the press.
2016-11-08
02:50:52, Tue
OUTBOX
1 get it. I'm not trying to fight with you too. I'm sorry.
153
DOJ-PROD-0000319
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-11-08
02:53:39, Tue
INBOX
I mean how in the HELL do you assume you know something
outside of your field? How can you not, as an accomplished lawyer,
understand how far and wide the field of law is? You or or
whoever would ever assume knowledge of things outside of
criminal law. It bossies mv mind.
2016-11-08
15:44:13, Tue
INBOX
I don't think it's bad. 1 think there are agents doing as much who
will not get a visit from the DD because Jon does a good job of
advertising his people
2016-11-08
15:47:25, Tue
INBOX
They are Jens people not mine. \n\nAlthough it looks like Jon said
2016-11-08
15:48:31, Tue
INBOX
Is he going to the room, or just sioc?
2016-11-08
15:49:16, Tue
OUTBOX
He will go see the analysts, room, and sioc. Maybe I'll take
him by duhadaway as well.
2016-11-08
15:52:09, Tue
INBOX
Ok I'm with but going to Duhadway at 11 with
2016-11-08
16:03:27, Tue
INBOX
1 guess I'm also cranky that has a prominent role at the 11 mtg
that he should be at ON ELECTION DAY.
2016-11-09
01:06:45, Wed
INBOX
\U0001f60a\n\nHsppy Election geekdom here.
2016-11-09
04:06:58, Wed
OUTBOX
Trump won NC
2016-11-09
04:20:14, Wed
OUTBOX
PBS is projecting Florida as well.
2016-11-09
04:35:02, Wed
OUTBOX
CNN projecting FL for Trump.
2016-11-09
05:49:11, Wed
INBOX
Damn
2016-11-09
09:34:14, Wed
OUTBOX
And there it is.
2016-11-09
09:58:18, Wed
OUTBOX
Analogous to the public editor article Bill handed out. \n\nNews
Media Yet Again Misreads America\u2019s Complex Pulse
http://nyti.ms/2eCqXVM
2016-11-09
12:13:37, Wed
INBOX
Too hard to explain here. Election related. Which is also godawful
bad.\n\nSure
2016-11-09
09:58:18, Wed
OUTBOX
Are you even going to give out your calendars? Seems kind of
depressing. Maybe it should just be the first meeting of the secret
society.
2016-11-09
12:44:06, Wed
OUTBOX
And Christ, we should just hit those thumb drives now. Their
opinion is totally irrelevant.
2016-11-09
12:50:49, Wed
INBOX
No. And yes
2016-11-09
12:51:16, Wed
OUTBOX
I'll mention to Andy.
2016-11-09
16:35:28, Wed
INBOX
Omg 1 am so depressed
2016-11-09
17:03:50, Wed
OUTBOX
Yes, maybe. 1 need to see what wants to do first.
154
DOJ-PROD-0000320
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-11-09
18:01:21, Wed
OUTBOX
And honestly, 1 don't know if I can eat. 1 am very nauseous.
2016-11-09
23:41:50, Wed
INBOX
Nice. Flash mob in front of old post office. Great for the commute.
2016-11-10
09:32:53, Thu
OUTBOX
Hey without thinking 1 replied to the email you sent me on Gmail.
But it went to your verizon. So please clear. Let me know if you
want me to send it again somewhere else.
2016-11-10
10:45:55, Thu
OUTBOX
The Burden on Donald Trump -
Lawfare\nhttps://www.lawfareblog.com/burden-donald-trump
2016-11-10
11:11:57, Thu
OUTBOX
You clear verizon?
2016-11-10
11:15:42, Thu
OUTBOX
Okay, I've gotta go. Read that lawfare article. It's really sobering.
2016-11-10
11:16:34, Thu
INBOX
I'm reading it now. Resent you (and ) his much earlier post
about whether to stay in government
2016-11-10
13:11:21, Thu
INBOX
Bill just sent a two hour invite to talk strategy from 1-3. Im in no
mood to do so.
2016-11-10
17:50:43, Thu
INBOX
Drafting TPs for andy, can 1 send to you and further refine so he can
hopefully call tomorrow. \n\nWe're now thinking Bill and 1 go, will
explain. Maybe even fly Sun night, met Mon, fly back Mon night,
only out of the office one work day. Or fly Thurs after work, meet
and flv back Fri.
2016-11-11
01:11:17, Fri
OUTBOX
went to Bob today. He got me two names as referrals.
\UOOOlf 6 ld\UOOOlf 6 ld\UOOOlf 6 ld\UOOOlf 6 ld\UOOOlf 6 ld\UOOO
lf61d\U0001f61d\U0001f61d\U0001f61d\U0001f61d\U0001f61d\
U0001f61d\U0001f61d\U0001f61d\U0001f61d\U0001f61d\U0001
f61d\U0001f61d\U0001f61d\U0001f61d\U0001f61d\U0001f61d\U
0001f61d\U0001f61d\U0001f61d\U0001f61d\U0001f61d\U0001f6
ld\U0001f61d\U0001f61d\U0001f61d\U0001f61d\U0001f61d\UO
nai.f6idv.innniffiid ... ..
2016-11-11
01:12:51, Fri
INBOX
YES!!!!! We'll talk about it tomorrow. Send me the names so you
dont forget and 1 can research.N
2016-11-11
12:33:32, Fri
INBOX
K. I’m sitting here kind of depressed about the reality of the TPs we
wrote yesterday...
2016-11-11
12:36:09, Fri
OUTBOX
I'm extremely depressed. Though today it's mostly not about work.
Ttyl.
2016-11-11
OUTBOX
God, I'm really f-ing depressed.
19:57:20, Fri
2016-11-11
INBOX
20:09:17, Fri
_ ■
MI^^BliiBppp^nBill just called to talk about the sentiment
of everyone he was talking to....
2016-11-11
20:27:58, Fri
OUTBOX
Just everything. \n\nSentiment about what?
155
DOJ-PROD-OOOCI321
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-11-11
INBOX
sorry.
20:38:49, Fri
thinks we had something to do with the outcome.
2016-11-12
00:24:32, Sat
INBOX
1 like.our new case name
2016-11-12
00:56:45, Sat
OUTBOX
We'll see what others think. Alright, well sorry for interrupting. Talk
to you later.
2016-11-12
15:16:06, Sat
INBOX
Except recently it's been checking gtwn every 5\n\nHaving a really
tough time with election this morning
2016-11-12
18:20:00, Sat
OUTBOX
changed to Trump weekend, but it was more expensive. He said 1
can save $500 if 1 go dec 20-23.
2016-11-13
12:14:18, Sun
OUTBOX
NYTimes: Facebook, in Cross Hairs After Election, Is Said to
Question Its lnfluence\nFacebook, in Cross Hairs After Election, Is
Said to Question Its Influence http://nyti.ms/2erVrPd
2016-11-13
12:34:03, Sun
INBOX
How Teens In The Balkans Are Duping Trump Supporters With Fake
News\nhttps://www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilverman/how-
macedonia-became-a-global-hub-for-pro-trump-
misinfo?utm term=.fwg4alklb2#.ws7v'nxJxN6
2016-11-13
12:56:56, Sun
OUTBOX
you don't think there is any risk of
that interfering with london? I don't want to change it again.
2016-11-13
19:11:15, Sun
OUTBOX
1 bought all the president's men. Figure 1 needed to brush up on
Watergate. \U0001f615
2016-11-14
13:05:23, Mon
OUTBOX
Ran into in the elevator. Told him 1 was sad about the prospect
that he might not be staying on. He said he’d see what you want to
do... so maybe there's hope...
2016-11-14
13:51:27, Mon
OUTBOX
God, being here makes me angry. Lots of high fallutin' national
security talk. Meanwhile, we have OUR task ahead of us...
2016-11-14
INBOX
Yeah, 1 can only imagine.
14:06:53, Mon
So no update here. \U0001f621
2016-11-14
14:10:15, Mon
OUTBOX
Okay, I'll follow up.
2016-11-14
14:15:58, Mon
OUTBOX
Did 1 tell you that Charlie Savage is on a panel tomorrow?
\U0001f621
2016-11-14
14:40:34, Mon
OUTBOX
1 really need to be here for the EAD/AD mtg because it will be all
about transition.
2016-11-14
14:41:10, Mon
INBOX
A) ha. You going to introduce yourself? 1 wouldn't, nothing good
will come of it.\nB) open. Something worth listening to?
2016-11-14
14:41:18, Mon
INBOX
Talking planning with right now
2016-11-14
14:42:37, Mon
OUTBOX
B) dd plan to lay out the lanes in the road. Just need to be there 1
think. Would love a ride back to hq. Will just miss a session here.
156
DOJ-PROD-OOOCI322
Strzok-Paee Texts
2016-11-14
14:47:14, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-11-14
14:48:13, Mon
INBOX
2016-11-14
14:48:15, Mon
INBOX
2016-11-14
14:48:51, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-11-14
14:49:27, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-11-14
15:01:51, Mon
INBOX
2016-11-14
15:15:56, Mon
INBOX
2016-11-14
15:24:43, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-11-14
16:07:08, Mon
INBOX
2016-11-14
20:06:56, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-11-14
20:08:18, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-11-14
20:08:40, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-11-14
22:57:39, Mon
INBOX
2016-11-14
23:13:24, Mon
INBOX
2016-11-15
01:43:02. Tue
INBOX
2016-11-15
01:43:43, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-11-15
01:46:21, Tue
INBOX
2016-11-15
01:47:05, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-11-15
01:48:52, Tue
INBOX
2016-11-15
01:50:30, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-11-15
01:51:43, Tue
INBOX
2016-11-15
01:51:50, Tue
INBOX
Don't think so. Just Eads and ads. Dd doesn't intend to have anyone
lower than an AD talk to transition folks. Frankly, I'd prefer he do
all the engage ment, but that's not feasible. _
Oh. Thought you meant this case.
You have names?
Not yet. knows to email me here.
Oh, sorry. No, I meant transition writ large. Sorry for the confusion.
Still talking with Many transition issues to talk with you about
We'll get there ;)\n\nYou willing to set up lunch for me and
and you t o introduce us to to talk about C?
Call you a minute?
Bill stuck his head in, said travel as early as tomorrow. Didn't get
detail as I was in a mtg and he went upstairs to
God, I hate academics. Lots on the big bad fbi litigation with apple.
It's making me very angry.
BBC News: Trump and Putin hold telephone talks\nTrump and
Putin hold telephone talks-http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-
canada-37981770 _
CNN news crawl says source reports Trump wants Top Secret
clearance for his children __
Bill out of the office tonight, btw. So if you need him, call cell, or
call me. _
"CNN: Source says naming a Trump national security team a 'knife
fight'"_
Christ. What does that mean?!
I can only guess difference of opinion between Trump and
Republican establishment? _
I get it. I'm just exclaiming how f-ed it all is.
Problem is, I don’t know if that's it. I just have no idea...
My god, Sessions for DoD or AG.
Which is the f-ed uppedness of it
Who said that?
157
DOJ-PROD-OOOCI323
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-11-15
01:52:20, Tue
INBOX
And if goes AG, then bolsters the Giuliani State idea
2016-11-15
01:52:29, Tue
OUTBOX
The same article you referenced.
2016-11-15
01:52:44, Tue
OUTBOX
It also says either Bolton or Giuliani for state.
2016-11-15
01:56:53, Tue
INBOX
Ha. States going to EXPLODE
2016-11-15
02:06:05, Tue
INBOX
What page you on?
2016-11-15
02:06:37, Tue
OUTBOX
15. You distracted me with the news.
2016-11-15
11:56:44, Tue
OUTBOX
Yeah, and then the Deputy Director told you to go to London on 24
hours notice.
2016-11-16
08:25:18, Wed
OUTBOX
An article to share: How Bannon flattered and coaxed Trump on
policies key to the a!t'-right\nHow Bannon flattered and coaxed
Trump on policies key to the alt-right\nhttp://wapo.st/2fDJCSV
2016-11-16
OUTBOX
19:29:36, Wed
2016-11-16
INBOX
19:34:08, Wed
2016-11-16 OUTBOX
19:34:13, Wed
2016-11-16
INBOX
19:37:08, Wed
m
2016-11-16
OUTBOX
19:38:00, Wed
2016-11-16
19:58:15, Wed
OUTBOX
2016-11-16
21:27:29, Wed
INBOX
You, your age, plans after Andy goes, how to keep talent in the Bu.
2016-11-17
09:27:46, Thu
OUTBOX
God, this is scary. He apparently has not reached out to state at all
for briefing materials. \U0001f612\n\nNYTimes: How Shinzo Abe
Will Try to Size Up Donald Trump\nHow Shinzo Abe Will Try to Size
Up Donald Trump http://nvti.ms/2elhGiP
2016-11-17
09:33:36, Thu
INBOX
@ H/ @Yep. And the reason he wanted clearances for the kids is so
Jared Kushner could receive the PDB with him. Legally,! think he
can pretty much designate w
2016-11-17
09:33:39, Thu
INBOX
@ H/ @hoever he wants to receive it without a clearance..
2016-11-17
09:34:27, Thu
OUTBOX
Article today is saying none of that is going to happen.
2016-11-17
09:35:46, Thu
INBOX @ P/ @1 know he backed off of clearances, but there was another
legal piece looking at his authority to just grant access, and it's
pretty broad.\n\nAnd, 1 don't
2016-11-17
09:35:52, Thu
OUTBOX
It's is broad. He doesn't. And yes.
158
DOJ-PROD-OOOCI324
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-11-17
09:35:52, Thu
INBOX
@ ?/ @ think he has any idea what he's doing from one day to the
next.
2016-11-17
19:22:30, Thu
INBOX
Re your email, know briefed Pence, right
Gust so there are no surprises)?
2016-11-17
19:23:24, Thu
OUTBOX
1 don't know if they would recall who did, but they know we sent
someone. 1 spoke to about it. We both think there's no action
for us to take.
2016-11-17
19:32:32, Thu
OUTBOX
Re above re email, it might be more important for to know
that, briefed Pence, no?
2016-11-17
19:33:48, Thu
INBOX
1 think that's a good idea. I'll talk with so they build
messaging/don't overlap
2016-11-17
19:46:00, Thu
INBOX
Harumph. 1 want to see you. Is Andy on/regular length wrap?
2016-11-17
19:46:19, Thu
OUTBOX
Yes, so far as 1 know.
INBOX
Talking with Bill. Do we want to go with instead of
for a variety of reasoms?
OUTBOX
Hmm. Not sure. Would it be unusual to have show up again?
Maybe another agent from the team?
2016-11-17
19:49:43, Thu
.
INBOX
Or, he's "the Cl guy." Same.might make sense. He can assess if
thete are any news Qs, or different demeanor. If husband is
there, he can see if there are people we can develop for potential
relationships
2016-11-17
19:50:33, Thu
OUTBOX
Should 1 ask Andy about it? Or Bill want to reach out for andy?
2016-11-17
19:52:09, Thu
INBOX
1 told him I'm sure we could ask you to make the swap if we
thought it was smart. It's not until Mon so Bill can always discuss
with him tomorrow.
2016-11-17
19:53:02, Thu
OUTBOX
It's the regular mtg with Jim and Andy.
2016-11-17
19:54:54, Thu
INBOX
Oh. No you cant. WAH-wah.
2016-11-18
01:12:18, Fri
OUTBOX
Ha. This gave me a chuckle.\n\nNYTimes: A Trumpian Silver
Lining\nATrumpian Silver Lining http://nyti.ms/2f37625
2016-11-18
01:47:35, Fri
INBOX
Nope. Fixed it. Fly Tues, arr Wed. Meet Thurs and Fri. Fly back Sat.
All that assuming the other side can do those dates.
2016-11-18
11:18:07, Fri
INBOX
Was just reading NYT. Apparently
Mike Rogers has been to NY to visit Trump
2016-11-18
12:40:45, Fri
INBOX
Sessions for AG
2016-11-18
12:49:19, Fri
OUTBOX
Good god.
2016-11-18
21:22:11, Fri
INBOX
Disagree with Bill on last topic
2016-11-18
21:45:39, Fri
OUTBOX
Just hit you in lync but need to go see andy
2016-11-18
21:48:17, Fri
INBOX
Ok guess 1 missed you. Talking with and
159
DOJ-PROD-0000325
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-11-18
21:48:30, Fri
OUTBOX
Is Moffa there? 1 have a MYE q for him.
2016-11-18
21:49:23, Fri
INBOX
No. Don't know where he is what's the Q?
2016-11-18
22:15:46, Fri
INBOX
Also, pis ask Andy for the name of the 6 woman, 1 didn't write it
down. Thank you
2016-11-18
22:43:26, Fri
OUTBOX
?
2016-11-18
22:43:44, Fri
OUTBOX
He said just use
2016-11-19
00:37:40, Sat
INBOX
And hey just talked to Boone have clarity on the Errant email 1 sent
you, what said to Andy, questions Andy asked Boone about
it, and answers.
2016-11-19
00:41:10, Sat
INBOX
Finally, let me know if 1 can imsg you a question
2016-11-21
01:14:10, Mon
OUTBOX
This is really disgusting. \n\nNYTimes: White Nationalists Celebrate
\u2018an Awakening\u2019 After Donald Trump\u2019s
Victory\nWhite Nationalists Celebrate \u2018an Awakening\u2019
After Donald Trump\u2019s Victory http://nyti.ms/2fc6vve
2016-11-21
01:19:38, Mon
INBOX
Im worried racial tension is going to get really bad...
2016-11-21
01:19:45, Mon
INBOX
And god that was a depressing article
2016-11-21
17:24:07, Mon
INBOX
Trump spokesman declines to back FBI Director James Comey - The
Washington
Post\nhttps://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-
spokesman-declines-to-back-fbi-director-james-
comey/2016/ll/21/e9cde350-afe5-lle6-8616-
52bl5787add0_story.htm l?hpid=hp_hp-cards_mhp-card-
2016-11-21
23:00:25, Mon
INBOX
You gong past you old office after talking to Andy?
•
2016-11-22
10:55:20, Tue
INBOX
•
I have to study up for the briefing this afternoon
2016-11-22
10:56:35, Tue
OUTBOX
1 didn't realize you guys weren't ready to give it. You should have
said something.
2016-11-22
10:57:47, Tue
INBOX
It's really overdue. And if Mike is briefing it, wrong, and if Di is
trying to charge out and do dumb things, we need to do it.
2016-11-22
10:58:26, Tue
OUTBOX
True.
2016-11-22
11:10:42, Tue
OUTBOX
God, there's just so much to be wary of.\n\nNYTimes: Build He
Won\u2019t\nBuild He Won\u2019t http://nyti.ms/2eWb0Pu
2016-11-22
11:19:15, Tue
INBOX
Do you have a SATO travel account?
2016-11-22
OUTBOX
1 need DD ofc to pay, right? That's annoying. Don't need and
11:20:10, Tue
i Eric all up in my business. \U0Q01f612
160
DOJ-PROD-0000326
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-11-22
11:21:42, Tue
INBOX
No, use CD codes. Who's your on paper supervisor?
2016-11-22
11:22:13, Tue
OUTBOX
'
2016-11-22
11:22:41, Tue
INBOX
May come out of ogc, 1 don't know. Worse case, if it does, put
down her or Baker
2016-11-22
11:25:35, Tue
INBOX
Need to get you a Sato account ASAP. You can do on the phone but
there's an extra block to check about why you didn't online
2016-11-22
11:36:02, Tue
OUTBOX
It's not fair for it to come out of ogc. 1 guess 1 want dd ofc to pay.
It's only fair.
2016-11-22
11:36:28, Tue
OUTBOX
Maybe 1 have one. You'll have to help me figure out when 1 get in
2016-11-22
11:38:20, Tue
INBOX
CD is the right place. It's our business and we have a comparatively
big budget. 1 will check today.
2016-11-22
OUTBOX
Thats one thing THAT Is Going To Suck
12:31:33, Tue
ABOUT MY New office, EVERY ONE Will KNOW HOW Late 1 Get in. 1
stav late, so it shouldn't matter but still.
2016-11-22
15:42:19, Tue
INBOX
You in yet? Want to talk briefing structure as 1 am befuddled.
2016-11-22
15:49:10, Tue
OUTBOX
No. On way now.
2016-11-22
15:51:33, Tue
INBOX
Ok. Bill is aggravating me about the D brief tomorrow. He wants
me to handle the CHS and he'll do all the cases. \U0001f612
2016-11-22
15:52:43, Tue
OUTBOX
Well that's his perogative 1 guess. It represents a strange change.
Has he said why?
2016-11-22
15:55:06, Tue
INBOX
No. 1 assume it’s to take work off my plate. He said, since Jon's not
in. I'll do it. But 1 had been doing all of CH when Jon was focusing
on the broader election stuff. 1 need to talk to him
2016-11-22
15:56:30, Tue
INBOX
And 1 gave the D a summary of all of it last week with Andy just
before travel. Whatever, I'm not that worried, just think Bill is over
thinking this, especially the guy who's been named
2016-11-22
18:24:40, Tue
OUTBOX
In with andy
2016-11-22
18:25:36, Tue
INBOX
Oh. You going to be out before the 2? I'm SUPER curious about JR'S
5% worry - didn't hear what he said and didn't feel it was
appropriate to scream, like an old deaf man, WHAT?
2016-11-23
00:35:31, Wed
INBOX
Aggravated talking with Bill about the brief tomorrow morning but
that will be fine. Baker going to be there?
2016-11-23
16:58:02, Wed
OUTBOX
Sheesh. Bill get in touch with andy?
2016-11-23
16:59:08, Wed
INBOX
No, he left him a message
2016-11-23
INBOX
Tell you what, this is going to be an interesting meeting with them
17:01:55, Wed
in a couple of weeks
161
DOJ-PROD-OOOCI327
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-11-23 OUTBOX
22:09:17, Wed
22:20:04, Wed _■_ , __
2016-11-24 OUTBOX I am reading. Started All the President's Men.
02:08:54, Thu _
2016-11-24 OUTBOX Pretty good so far. Just started, so only a few pages in. The
02:12:50, Thu press focus is going to be annoying, especially knowing how
obnoxious and self-righteous they both turned out to be.
2016-11-24 OUTBOX Just sent you Andy’s response. It makes me happy.
20: 11:46, Thu ______
2016-11-24 INBOX That was a very nice response from. Andy
20:28:35, Thu _
2016-11-24 OUTBOX ~ lYeah. It made me happy.
20:32:30, Thu _J____
2016-11-26
12:45:01, Sat
INBOX
You see Trump chose a Fox News analyst as his Dep Ntnl Security
advisor?
2016-11-27
19:57:13, Sun
1
OUTBOX
: Maybe take an informal poll of folks tomorrow re flights/hotels.
2016-11-27
19:57:57, Sun
INBOX
Yep. Meeting with Jon and and tomorrow to decide what
to talk about, get all the paperwork going.
2016-11-27
19:59:31, Sun
INBOX
At which point I’ll direct everyone to take the Tuesday daytime
flight :D
2016-11-28
13:01:13, Mon
OUTBOX
2016-11-28
13:06:08, Mon
INBOX
2016-11-28
13:07:35, Mon
INBOX
And anticipate that means she will hang on Tues...all expected, 1
guess, was just hoping for different. \n\nJust got into work, have
my standing 830
2016-11-28
13:15:35, Mon
OUTBOX
Maybe re Tuesday. She might do touristy things though, since it's
been two decades since she was there.
2016-11-28
13:24:48, Mon
OUTBOX
and jon and the rest of them should be encouraged to take
another flight though.
2016-11-29
01:45:21, Tue
INBOX
Hey do you know why Bill was talking to Jim?
2016-11-29
01:46:45, Tue
INBOX
I’ll try and find out, re Bill. A bit concerning.
2016-11-29
01:48:38, Tue
OUTBOX
Also, jason herring spoke to me tonight about needing to get the
andy letters out to congress. 1 need to prioritize those ASAP. Like
have to be done and finalized before 1 can leave. \U0001f612
2016-11-29
01:50:24, Tue
INBOX
Ok, well, that's motivation. I'll help, obviously
2016-11-29
INBOX
1
02:34:43, Tue
162
DOJ-PROD-OOOCI328
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-11-29
02:37:26, Tue .
INBOX
2016-11-29 !
02:38:34, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-11-29
02:38:37, Tue
INBOX
2016-11-29
02:38:43, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-11-29
02:38:59, Tue ,
OUTBOX
2016-11-29
02:39:19, Tue
INBOX
2016-11-29
02:39:24, Tue
INBOX
2016-11-29
02:39:40, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-11-29
02:43:06, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-11-29
02:48:03, Tue
INBOX
2016-11-29
14:27:33, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-11-29
14:30:01, Tue
INBOX
2016-11-29
14:31:03, Tue
OUTBOX
2016-11-29
21:11:27, Tue
2016-11-29
22:5 1:28, Tue
2016-11-29
23:13:39, Tue
2016-11-29
23:1 3:58, Tue
2016-11-30
21:59:52, Wed
2016-12-01
01:52:01, Thu
2016-12-01
01:52:23, Thu
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
God, the mye letters re Andy ask for SOOOOOO much information.
\U0001f621\U0001f621\U0001f621_
Can we tailor what we send, ie, give them some subset of what
they're asking for?
We're going to have to.
Oof. Which letter (s), (or tabs in the binder)?
I'm going to meet with Andy at 5:30 about it.
And all good on both prep sessions tomorrow :)
Haven't met with andy yet. He is still in with the director.
How long you think you'll be with him? (Rough guess - 30 min?
Hour and a half?) _
Probably 45 minutes at least.
Sorry. Was in with andy.
. _
And I keep thinking about what the Dsaid, what was it, sick to
one's stomach? Want to talk with you about it more. And in would
like to talk to Jim and Andy too. Jim may be too much a true
believer though. _
I Mildly nauseous, he said.
163
DOJ-PROD-0000329
Strzok-Page Texts
2016-12-01
01:52:48, Thu
OUTBOX
Technically not sure you can talk to andy about it. \U0001f621
2016-12-01
02:05:14, Thu
INBOX
Yeah well Jims too blindly boyscoutish and others not thoughtful so
I can talk to him about his experience pre recusal. I'm not asking for
decisions. I'm asking how to think about it.
164
DOJ-PROD-0000330
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
Type
2016-11-30
12:35:55, Wed
INBOX
sms
2016-11-30
12:37:43, Wed
OUTBOX
\U0001f636 Thanks.
sms
2016-11-30
21:25:20, Wed
INBOX
Boo. Stopped by your office before ead wrap and no Lisa... :(
sms
2016-11-30
21:25:51, Wed
INBOX
Btw, your office location sucks \U0001f615
sms
2016-11-30
21:59:52, Wed
OUTBOX
Sorry. Was in with andy.
sms
2016-11-30
22:00:01, Wed
OUTBOX
Wrap niw.
sms
2016-12-01
01:52:01, Thu
INBOX
And 1 keep thinking about what the D said, what was it, sick to
one's stomach? Want to talk with you about it more. And in would
like to talk to Jim and Andy too. Jim may be too much a true
believer though.
sms
2016-12-01
01:52:23, Thu
OUTBOX
Mildly nauseous, he said.
sms
2016-12-01
01:52:48, Thu
OUTBOX
Technically not sure you can talk to andy about it. \U0001f621
sms
2016-12-01
01:53:19, Thu
INBOX
F that 1 cant
sms
2016-12-01
01:53:43, Thu
OUTBOX
I'm just saying...
sms
2016-12-01
02:05:14, Thu
INBOX
Yeah well and others not thoughtful
so 1 can talk to him about his experience pre recusal. I'm not
asking for decisions. I'm asking how to think about it.
sms
2016-12-01
Ok, vomit
uz:zy :b/, \ nu
2016-12-01
02:30:19, Thu
ni iTRrw
kelax.
1 x i
2016-12-01
02:33:56, Thu
INBOX
sms
2016-12-01
02:36:09, Thu
INBOX
mms
2016-12-01
02:36:31, Thu
1NBOX
sms
2016-12-01
21:03:05, Thu
OUTBOX
Sorrvtn miss you. Had an excellent conversation witi
though.
sms
2016-12-02
00:47:12, Fri
INBOX
Hi. Just leaving. Infuriating story from Bill, can tell you tomorrow
or on imsg
sms
2016-12-02
00:48:26, Fri
OUTBOX
Feel free to imsg.
sms
2016-12-02
01:06:40, Fri
INBOX
Sent there
sms
2016-12-02
10:52:14, Fri
INBOX
Weird about the clock. Thats interesting. Tells me how.much of
this is messed up in your head stuff. \n\nRemind me the first 15
minutes of talking to Bill last night. Full page with list of things
about head euv.
sms
1
DOJ-PROD-0000331
Date UTC
2016-12-02
10:53:33, Fri
2016-12-02
10:54:19, Fri
2016-12-02
10:55:33, Fri
2016-12-02
10:55:36, Fri
2016-12-02
10:58:00, Fri
2016-12-02
10:58:15, Fri
2016-12-02
10:59:58, Fri
Type of Message Body
I don't understand the second half of your text at all.
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
Awesome.
Last night, I talked with Bill before leaving. Very first thing he did
was show me a page of notes, bullets, he had written about
Oh jeez.
Bill is just not getting it. \U0001f612
I think it's he can't get over his outrage at how bad it is. I said, Bill,
we're not going to get anywhere trying to prove those things.
2016-12-02
11:03:27, Fri
2016-12-02
19:59:43, Fri
2016-12-02
21:12:08, Fri
2016-12-02
21:12:42, Fri
2016-12-02
21:12:50, Fri
2016-12-02
21:12:58, Fri
2016-12-02
21:13:39, Fri
2016-12-02
21:13:59, Fri
2016-12-02
21:14:14, Fri
2016-12-02
21:50:26, Fri
2016-12-02
21:52:34, Fri
2016-12-02
21:55:20, Fri
2016-12-02
21:55:37, Fri
2016-12-02
22:10:09, Fri
2016-12-02
22:10:41, Fri
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
Exactly. It IS awful. But it's not something we can do something
about without grave risk. Andy and I talked about this piece of it
too the other day. He'll discuss today I expect.
Bill moved wrap up to 3. Will hit you when done.
Okay, coming back.
Oh. Thought I was supposed to leave.
Want me to come back?
|\U0001f60a
Oh. Yes, that's right. I probably wasn't listening. :D
EXACTLY
Be right there :D
Ok that didn't take long, I'm bored let me know when I can come
So that's a "now"? :D
Waiting for :o call back.
2
DOJ-PROD-0000332
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
Type
2016-12-02
23:38:23, Fri
INBOX
Ho boy. This is going to stir up some sh*t\n\nNYTimes: Trump
Speaks With Taiwan\u2019s Leader, a Likely Affront to
China\nTrump Speaks With Taiwan\u2019s Leader, a Likely
Affront to China http://nvti.ms/2ewshOM
sms
2016-12-02
23:45:14, Fri
OUTBOX
1 know. 1 saw. Idiots...
sms
2016-12-10
04:19:41, Sat
INBOX
We need to talk about this in the context of the testimony last
Friday. And 1 need to ask Jason to get a transcript if he can.
\n\nNYTimes: Russia Hacked Republican Committee, U.S.
Concludes\nRussia Hacked Republican Committee, U.S. Concludes
http://nvti.ms/2h5Xooi
sms
2016-12-10
17:42:20, Sat
INBOX
Had an hour long convo with Bill. Talked about the meeting (they
had it at DoJ, Bill, Jim and Jon), expressed our frustration, Bill
responded. \n\nTalked about and WFO SAC job, what I
expected, and >aying which is fine, you know the
conflicted way 1 feel about that but it is what it is. Mike said
something super irritating to Bill, essentially, Pete briefs well but
he needs more time to demonstrate his ability to manage. Bill
said he thought that was just a fig leaf for saying out it
aggravates me. I'm sorry, I'm not briefing what someone tells me,
I'm briefing what I'm doing. And I'm managing (for the case) a ton
of people in various divisions and multiple agencies and foreign
governments. Not to menion the issues I've briefed you on and
am managing for cd3, etc. \n\ni do think it's a fig leaf, but have
the balls to say, Pete, you're doing a great job. Keep it up. Youve
just gotten promoted, twice, and we need you as a DAD where
you can do good: embrace that role. DON'T tell me, you brief well
but you need to show me some more management skill. F you. 1
manage my ass off every goddamn day in this sh*tstorm, and
keep the branch running to boot.
mms
2016-12-10
17:42:27, Sat
INBOX
Lots more to discuss.
sms
2016-12-10
17:46:16, Sat
OUTBOX
That is 100% a fig leaf. And more than a fig leaf, it's a reflection of
insecurity and arrogant overconfidence. Don't give it a
second more thought. 1 mean it.
sms
2016-12-10
17:47:06, Sat
OUTBOX
Was Bill's response re meeting adequate?
sms
2016-12-10
17:50:00, Sat
INBOX
But how much does his saying that translate to the other EADs?
out the door, as Is but 1 don't want aolsoned
by it. Think I'm good witf and just with more time.
sms
2016-12-10
17:51:48, Sat
INBOX
It was OK. 1 told him we heard via / and that we were
all disappointed. He said he understood, but he was able to talk
that way broadly without giving any specifics, so he thinks it
helped rather than hurt. Said we hadn't closed anything, and
generally talked about our path forward. Said they didn't ask for
an update when we got back, and that he thought we were in a
good nlacp_
sms
3
DOJ-PROD-0000333
Date UTC
Type of Message
2016-12-10
17:51:55, Sat
OUTBOX
2016-12-10
17:53:46, Sat
INBOX
2016-12-10
17:54:33, Sat
OUTBOX
2016-12-10
17:56:18, Sat
INBOX
2016-12-10
17:56:40, Sat
OUTBOX
2016-12-10
17:57:16, Sat
OUTBOX
2016-12-10
17:58:14, Sat
INBOX
2016-12-10
17:58:54, Sat
OUTBOX
2016-12-10
17:59:17, Sat
OUTBOX
2016-12-10
17:59:44, Sat
INBOX
2016-12-10
18:00:41, Sat
OUTBOX
2016-12-10
18:01:10, Sat
INBOX
2016-12-10
18:01:52, Sat
OUTBOX
I know, but I told Bill I really needed him to determine whether or
not I should even put in, and the message it sends either way. He
said he would talk to Andy this week. _
It won't. Stop worrying. Trust me.\n\nlf you had more time as
DAD under your belt, do you actually think would even
stand a chance because of some bs claim that you need more
proven leadership? Because that happened when you both were
up for DAD? Come on. It's face-saving for pure and simple.
The answer is no, Pete. 100% no. Andy will say the same.
)f Thus came up in the context of bill asking about a
for who deserves it, and Bill was told no. I assume
/ould be a different answer for So I need to talk to
:o see if he'd be interested in an SC job in CD, because he'd
All this irks me. Let's just
is interested.
It will be a permanent SC, I
robablv stav there the rest of his career.
4
DOJ-PROD-0000334
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
Type
2016-12-10
18:02:51, Sat
INBOX
1 think Is interested, too, based on convos we've had. 1 don't
know whether to put him in 4 or 2. Don't think he has the Cl
background for 3.
sms
2016-12-10
18:03:13, Sat
INBOX
problem is he's never even been an SSA.
sms
2016-12-10
18:03:39, Sat
INBOX
People obviously understand he's now been both dgc and ad of
oca, but stuff like that matters.
sms
2016-12-10
18:03:59, Sat
OUTBOX
That's a different conversation, and one he can have not in this
context. Or even better, one YOU should have with Andy. It would
be more meaningful that way anyway. "Andy, I'm not putting in
for sac, but where do you see me... Especially since 1 heard
criticism of me from Mike which 1 didn't think was fair, wanted to
make sure you didn't think that was widely thought..."\n\n2.
sms
2016-12-10
18:04:07, Sat
INBOX
Most importantly, as far as I'm concerned, he's a good guy and 1
would trust him as a SC.
sms
2016-12-10
18:04:16, Sat
OUTBOX
It does. That's why he won't be allowed to advance.
sms
2016-12-10
18:05:54, Sat
INBOX
1 didn't tell you the grown up convo 1 had to have with in
London, when he asked and got angry at why 1 was likely not to be
the next SAC, and had to be the calm measured professional
explaining all the reasons why not.
sms
2016-12-10
18:07:14, Sat
OUTBOX
got angry? Understandable, but I'm proud of you for
explaining it. 1 hope you truly believe it as well.
sms
2016-12-10
18:08:53, Sat
INBOX
Yes he did. You know how 1 feel. 1 believe it, just as 1 believe had 1
not applied for or applied for and not gotten the DAD job, that 1
would have a great shot at it. And that 1 believe I'm the best
person for both jobs, and ultimately, the best to be Bill's successor
in CD.
sms
2016-12-10
18:10:19, Sat
OUTBOX
All of that is correct. You just can't move having been DAD for
three months. If you had stayed SC, you would be SAC. And you
will be AD too.
sms
2016-12-10
18:11:52, Sat
INBOX
If 1 stay long enough or am willing to move, for sure. But neither ol
those are necessarily true. But nothing 1 can do but work hard and
answer whatever decision is in front of me.
sms
2016-12-10
18:14:42, Sat
OUTBOX
That's the right attitude. 1 just hope you believe it in your heart of
hearts.
sms
2016-12-10
18:16:40, Sat
INBOX
You know im conflicted! To show my muddle, think of it this
alternative way: I've now been back at HQ for 16 months. Had
John G not been gone all the time and the board gone earlier, 1
would have been an SESer for over a year now. Woulda coulda
shoulda, 1 know. \n\nHow long was Jason acting?
sms
2016-12-10
18:18:04, Sat
OUTBOX
Acting AD? Since August, 1 think.
sms
2016-12-10
18:18:45, Sat
OUTBOX
Back at HQ doesn't count. You were still an asac, on detail.
sms
5
DOJ-PROD-0000335
Date UTC
2016-12-10
18:20:03, Sat
2016-12-10
18:20:54, Sat
2016-12-10
18:21:11, Sat
2016-12-10
18:21:37, Sat
2016-12-10
18:22:12, Sat
2016-12-10
18:22:25, Sat
2016-12-10
18:24:31, Sat
2016-12-10
18:27:32, Sat
2016-12-10
18:29:45, Sat
2016-12-10
18:30:10, Sat
2016-12-10
18:47:30, Sat
2016-12-10
19:15:56 , Sat
2016-12-10
19:16:26, Sat
2016-12-10
19:17:45, Sat
2016-12-10
22:04:18, Sat
2016-12-10
22:06:03, Sat
[Type of Message
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
2016-12-10
22:06:28, Sat
INBOX
2016-12-10
22:17:34, Sat
OUTBOX
2016-12-10
22:23:14, Sat
INBOX
2016-12-10
22:23:27, Sat
INBOX
2016-12-10
22:25:46, Sat
OUTBOX
2016-12-10
22:29:17, Sat
INBOX
Even an SESer over a year doesn't change three month as DAD.
It's not long enough in your current role. And christ, you're NEED
in this role. Way more than you'd need to be as SAC. Just relax,
It will come. I promise you. _
I'm not needed. I need to show I can effectively manage.
\U00 01fG12_
Wish wouldn't have said anything about that, or called
BS
Cause this is going to sit in the back of my head like a festering
pile of crap. _
Peter. In the immortal words of Jim Baker/Taylor Swift: Haters
gonna h a te...shake it off, shake it off. \U0001f60a _
Don't let it. Do you respect
And how did that guidance work for you?\n\nEnough. I thought at
least we had a decent relationship he would say that sort of BS. I
get his faults, but still. Just say the truth. _
He's too arrogant. He can't see the truth.
I haven't worked closely with him enough to see that
And maybe vaguely related, man I'm angry the way worked
out. That article is horrible. _
Oh please. I'm calling BS on you respect him. I don't. What non-
critical thing have you ever had to say about him?\n\nAnd yes,
probably related. \U(J0Ulf512 _
A) I think he does a decent job advocating for CD in front of
audiences like the SAC conference. _
Okay, great. Mad props to him then. \U0001f612
A) fine. Look, I'm obviously cranky/stung/demotivated by it.
Just talked with Jon for an hour.
Back to being a little cranky with Bill about the meeting. Jon asked
Bill on Thurs if it was still on. Bill told him to talk to him Fri AM.
Jon said JB was really good at the mtg, kept saying, we don't know
or we're not going to discuss that. He's obviously as worried as he
was. _
Plus remind me stories of iod f'ing up visit with Andy and
I can talk if you want. Have 10 minutes or so.
I can't. Check email.
Though I desperately want to \U0001f636
Yeah, I saw.
6
DOJ-PROD-0000336
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
Type
2016-12-10
22:29:51, Sat
OUTBOX
Npr just reported that that ExxonMobil guy possibly nominated
for state has close ties to putin.
sms
2016-12-10
22:37:12, Sat
INBOX
Oh yeah! He got an Award of Friendship directly from Putin!
sms
2016-12-10
22:38:17, Sat
OUTBOX
Interesting choice for Sec State then.
sms
2016-12-10
22:39:47, Sat
INBOX
Yep! He's 64, and has spent 41 of them at Exxon. Started as a
production engineer, and rose to do oil and gas deals around the
world. Statecraft.
sms
2016-12-11
01:10:13, Sun
OUTBOX
Great. This sentence aggravated the s out of me. \nTrump has
threatened a lot of people and he\u2019s about to be in control
of the most pervasive and least accountable surveillance
infrastructure in the world,\u201d Mr. Marlinspike said. \u201cA
lot of people are justifiably concerned about
that.\u201d\n\nNYTimes: Worried About the Privacy of Your
Messages? Download Signal\nWorried About the Privacy of Your
Messages? Download Signal http://nyti.ms/2hjyWo
sms
2016-12-11
01:28:18, Sun
INBOX
Yeah, me too. Don't know who or where to support....
sms
2016-12-12
11:36:37, Mon
INBOX
God.\n\nln separately irritating news,JB apparently offered to
meet with David Kendall and his secretary set it up. None of us,
including heard anything about it until mentioned it
to us.
sms
2016-12-12
11:37:18, Mon
INBOX
Possihlv today. Possibly about return of evidence. Possibly he'll
take along. Possibly he'll want to do some prep. None of us
really know. \U0001f612
sms
2016-12-12
11:37:35, Mon
INBOX
Maybe it came up at the Fri meeting none of us attended.
sms
2016-12-12
11:41:37, Mon
OUTBOX
Then somebody whose name is not Lisa Page needs to tell him
that it is insulting to have to learn about important meetings from
DOJ.
sms
2016-12-12
11:43:14, Mon
INBOX
1 will. 1 don't thin! can in the same way.
sms
2016-12-12
11:43:41, Mon
INBOX
After 1 find out if Bill and/or Jon knew
sms
2016-12-12
11:44:00, Mon
INBOX
Though neither mentioned.
sms
2016-12-12
20:32:25, Mon
INBOX
1 talked to Bill about the CyD matter we discussed, he said Andy is
aware.\n\nThank you for stepping out to grab the lifesavers.
sms
2016-12-13
19:57:40, Tue
INBOX
What floor is jcc?
sms
2016-12-13
19:58:44, Tue
OUTBOX
6 or 7. On the 9th Street side.
sms
2016-12-13
19:59:15, Tue
INBOX
Oh. Thought it was 10th...you sure?
sms
2016-12-13
20:30:29, Tue
OUTBOX
Sorry. Was on with the intercept. Yeah, Mike just mentioned.
Something sanctioned, obviously. God, 1 hate the intercept.
sms
7
DOJ-PROD-0000337
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
Type
2016-12-13
20:57:46, Tue
INBOX
Coffee /tea?\n\nStories for you.
sms
2016-12-13
21:03:21, Tue
INBOX
Let me know when you're done, want to hear about it, obviously
sms
2016-12-13
21:36:50, Tue
INBOX
Need to talk to you before wrap
sms
2016-12-13
22:31:53, Tue
INBOX
Who is: |
sms
2016-12-13
22:34:06, Tue
OUTBOX
No idea.
sms
2016-12-13
22:34:33, Tue
INBOX
These texts are quite the.
sms
2016-12-13
22:35:24, Tue
OUTBOX
You're killing me.
sms
2016-12-13
22:36:01, Tue
INBOX
Text from reporter: retrieving my password for skype. 1 forgot
it.\n\nText from reporter an hour and 31 minutes later: thanks
man. Awesome as usual
sms
2016-12-13
22:36:26, Tue
OUTBOX
Jesus.
sms
2016-12-13
22:37:23, Tue
INBOX
And Oh. I'm literally on the 5th line of a 2417 line spreadsheet.
sms
2016-12-13
22:42:07, Tue
OUTBOX
I'm calling now.
sms
2016-12-13
22:43:28, Tue
OUTBOX
Wtf, where'd you go?
sms
2016-12-13
22:44:38, Tue
INBOX
In with Bill an dads
sms
2016-12-13
22:45:00, Tue
OUTBOX
Aaarggh.
sms
2016-12-13
22:54:05, Tue
OUTBOX
I'm going to try to leave as soon as 1 get 5 minutes with andy. The
d had wrap.
sms
2016-12-13
22:55:03, Tue
OUTBOX
Jm said that the D asked Dd about the phone records pull today.
So 1 am going to mention it, but no details.
sms
2016-12-13
22:55:12, Tue
INBOX
K. Bill is rambling. I'll let you know when done
sms
2016-12-13
23:17:22, Tue
INBOX
Hi. You in with him?
sms
2016-12-13
23:18:17, Tue
OUTBOX
Still waiting for him to get out. \U0001f621
sms
2016-12-13
23:21:14, Tue
INBOX
Talked with DoJ about HA interview. Told them we had to
interview, no immunity. They said they thought that would get
counsel to the point of saying she's either taking the 5th in the Gj
or you need to give her immunity. 1 said that's fine, please have
discussions to get the decision to that point and 1 would run up
the chain
sms
2016-12-13
23:21:41, Tue
INBOX
hen asked if Toscas should call Mike, as that was his
understanding of who his new POC was on this case.
sms
2016-12-13
23:21:50, Tue
OUTBOX
Do 1 need to bring up to andy at some point?
sms
2016-12-13
23:22:03, Tue
INBOX
1 said Bill would be better, but that 1 needed to run past Bill to see
what he says
sms
s
DOJ-PROD-0000338
Date UTC
2016-12-13
23:22:15, Tue
2016-12-13
23:22:18, Tue
2016-12-13
23:22:39, Tue
2016-12-13
23:22:47, Tue
2016-12-13
23:22:50, Tue
2016-12-13
23:23:11, Tue
2016-12-13
23:23:17, Tue
2016-12-13
23:23:27, Tue
2016-12-13
23:24:22, Tue
2016-12-13
23:24:25, Tue
2016-12-13
23:24:58, Tue
2016-12-13
23:25:31, Tue
2016- 12-14
00:01:58, Wed
2017- 05-18
18:58:07, T hu
2017-05-18
2 2:56:59, T hu
2017-05-18
23:08:21, Thu
2017-05-18
23:08:39, Thu
2017-05-18
23:09:59, Thu
2017-05-18
23:13:06, Thu
2017-05-18
23:29:13, Thu
2017-05-18
23:41:18, Thu
2017-05-19
00:08:40, FrL
2017-05-19
00:11:23, Fri
2017-05-19
00:11:29, Fri
[Type of Message
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
Body_
Is he recused? (\U0001f621\U0001f621)
Oh yeah. I forgot. \U0001f621\U0001f612
Yes! All mye matters.
Double \U0001f621\U0001f612\U0001f621\U0001f612
I know.
I'm just angry about it.
Me too.
I fell into the same, what in the hell are you talking about Mike as
POC mental trap \U0001f621_
Literally wondered if Andy had finally decided to delegate down
management of George _
I kinda want to print these logs out and take them home :D
No kidding. Will figure out a day to work late.
Ok, I need to go back in with Bill. Jen and Dina still there. Call me
later....particularly interested if D gave a fuller description of his
convo^with Brennan_
Shocker, problems in ny.
It you get done and have Bill and Jon tor a dump about last eve,
please call me....
Sorry one sec.
K. Talking with Bill about you, actually
Hmmm.
Just called your desk
Was talking to bill. He is calling me back when he is done with
you. _
Let me know what he says. I was surprised how hard he pushed
me to think about it. The strength of my reaction to that is kinda
confirming to me I don't want to. _
Oh god Susan Collis comments on npr....
said absolutely no question I have to be on the team. I'm so
confused right now... _
Really?!?!
As in, with her?
9
DOJ-PROD-0000339
Date UTC
Type of Message
2017-05-19
00:11:58, Fri
INBOX
2017-05-19
00:12:09, Fri
INBOX
2017-05-19
00:13:43, Fri
INBOX
2017-05-19
00:13:54, Fri
INBOX
2017-05-19
00:19:05, Fri
OUTBOX
2017-05-19
00:19:17, Fri
INBOX
2017-05-19
00:19:43, Fri
OUTBOX
2017-05-19
00:22:03, Fri
OUTBOX
2017-05-19
00:22:49, Fri
OUTBOX
2017-05-19
00:24:26, Fri
INBOX
2017-05-19
00:25:28, Fri
OUTBOX
2017-05-19
00:26:41, Fri
OUTBOX
2017-05-19
00:29:27, Fri
INBOX
2017-05-19
00:30:08, Fri
INBOX
2017-05-19
00:32:35, Fri
INBOX
2017-05-19
00:32:54, Fri
INBOX
2017-05-19
00:33:34, Fri
OUTBOX
2017-05-19
00:35:40, Fri
INBOX
2017-05-19
00:36:15, Fri
INBOX
2017-05-19
00:37:23, Fri
OUTBOX
And that's what I wanted to talk about!!!!\n\nMy answer is no
way, sac then AD and lead the Division _
And then I think..
A case which will be in the history books. A chapter - much like
you tell me about my extra time in the field and all the cases
("would you trade it"?). \n\nA million people sit in AD and staff
jobs. This is a chance to DO. In maybe the most important case of
our live s._
What did Andy say about going?
No way dude. I really don't think you should do it..
You would obviously excel on the team, \n\nln a thousand ways
they n eed someon e EXACTLY like you _
I don't really know what she meant when she said on the team.
Full time, part time, I got home so our convo was cut short.
Why? I don't understand what they need me for! Not when they
have someone like Aaron. Or or
And oaid some really outrageous complements to me. I just
don't get what she even means.
Ok I obviously want to hear what said
I won't be able to repeat. Something about being the second
smartest lawyer she has ever worked with besides comey. It can't
b e true. _
And how I lean in and have a stronger work ethic than anyone she
k nows. And more but I don't remember. _ _
You're in an entirely different class than or
You see the future. You assimilate and combine things in am
uncanny way.
And re your attorney image of yourself, that's because you equate
brilliant lawyer with or Trisha sitting in a room writing
something as a clerk. \n\nREAL law is the application in a
complex, dynamic environment. And you're astoundingly good at
that
Plus you have passion and curiosity, which is more than half of the
battle anyway _^_
I am so not in a different class from and That is crazy.
They don't get the big picture like you do is operationally
amazing. But scaling law up rapidly and with agility is something
that makes you special. THAT'S the mark of a brilliant mind.
For me, and this case, I personally have a sense of unfinished
business, \n\nl unleashed it with MYE. Now i need to fix it and
finish it
What does that even mean, scaling up
10
DOJ-PROD-0000340
2017-05-19
00:45:57, Fri
OUTBOX
We should stop having this conversation here. Just tell bill you
need another day and we can discuss tomorrow.
sms
2017-05-19
00:47:33, Fri
OUTBOX
And certainly, that would certainly impact my thinking too. We
can't work closely on another case again, though obviously, 1 want
vou to do what is right for vou.
sms
2017-05-19
00:54:23, Fri
INBOX
A) ok. Though now I'm curious.\n\nB) sigh. Yeah 1 suppose that's
right. But god we're a good team. \U0001f636\U0001fS14 Is that
playing into yur decision/your advice to me?
sms
2017-05-19
00:54:34, Fri
INBOX
Chaffetz stepping down June 30....
sms
2017-05-19
00:55:13, Fri
OUTBOX
No. Not at all. 1 just think we are both ready for a change. Truly.
sms
2017-05-19
00:55:59, Fri
OUTBOX
A) is just about the different realistic outcomes of this case.
sms
2017-05-19
00:56:37, Fri
B) that's definitely true. 1 want/need you to give me your old
resume. \n\nC) 1 think I'll wait and see what happens with sac
wfo. I'm not expecting to get it, 1 just want to see what 1 feel like
INBOX
after the decision.
sms
2017-05-19
00:57:39, Fri
INBOX
A) you and 1 both know the odds are nothing. If 1 thought it was
likely, I'd be there no question. 1 hesitate in part because of my
gut sense and concern there's no big there there.
sms
2017-05-19
00:58:32, Fri_
OUTBOX
A) Pete. Let's talk about this tomorrow. \U0001f621
sms
2017-05-19
00:58:59, Fri
INBOX
Regardless of the outcome, 1 think there's a certain savvy business
decision for you to do it \n\n600k/year + doing white hat
corporate investigations isn't a bad exit strategy.
sms
2017-05-19
00:59:12, Fri
OUTBOX
C) Is that going tomorrow?
sms
2017-05-19
00:59:52, Fri
INBOX
A) fine! Didn't think 1 said anything wrong. But fine. \nC) yep. Is
Andy going to the board?
sms
2017-05-19
01:00:40, Fri
INBOX
C) 1 suppose he can't. He has to sign as D so 1 don't know if that
means he can't chair the board.
sms
11
DOJ-PROD-0000341
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
Type
2017-05-19
01:00:46, Fri
OUTBOX
Don't know.
sms
2017-05-19
01:01:06, Fri
OUTBOX
Have to go eat. Talk to you tomorrow
sms
2017-05-19
01:01:30, Fri
INBOX
K. Bye, Lisa. Hope some sleep brings clarity.
sms
2017-05-19
02:15:28, Fri
INBOX
If 1 don't go, does that make your decision easier?
sms
2017-05-19
02:17:18, Fri
OUTBOX
Nope.
sms
2017-05-19
02:20:20, Fri
INBOX
I'm struggling
sms
2017-05-19
02:23:22, Fri
OUTBOX
1 honestly think the break will be rejuvenating.
sms
2017-05-19
02:24:46, Fri
OUTBOX
Want to talk to Andy? Be honest that you're worried about your
future with D and him gone? Be honest that if you don't get AD,
you'd rather just finish out your career doing work you love?
sms
2017-05-19
02:33:23, Fri
INBOX
Maybe. But 1 don't want to before the board, \n\nl just want to
make a difference. To have counted for something, to be in the
game, down by one. \n\nWhy such a desire to prove myself?
sms
2017-05-19
03:16:04, Fri
INBOX
And 1 know you deal with it with me all the time, so you're inured,
in a different spot...but it was wrong, injust, even - for me to not
be there today. \n\nYou may not get it. \n\nJon does.\n\nWhat
was thinking? Where was that in talking to his boss?\n\nDid
you care once you got an invite? (be brutally honest no you
didn't)\n\nAnd that may make my decision.
sms
2017-05-19
03:28:55, Fri
INBOX
1 deserved a chance to see these people, to see if 1 wanted to go
with them
sms
2017-05-19
09:42:32, Fri
INBOX
4:45 and still no better answer. Just trying to get the
angry/cranky/whiny out of my thinking. 1 need to objectively see
the issue and set it, sterile, on a shelf. Sorry about my second to
last text last night.
sms
2017-05-19
10:07:08, Fri
OUTBOX
1 get that you should have been there! Geez Pete.
sms
2017-05-19
10:18:02, Fri
INBOX
1 know! 1 was grumpiness. \n\nAnd 1 figured out what's behind
that (which we said yesterday), but been thinking in terms of how
that impacts my decision. Not for here, though. \n\nYou sleep at
all?
sms
2017-05-19
10:26:58, Fri
INBOX
You wake up with a better sense of what you want to do?
sms
2017-05-19
10:41:08, Fri
OUTBOX
No. I'm just going to have to feel it out. Probably talk to
more.
sms
2017-05-19
10:41:30, Fri
OUTBOX
I'll be in the car at 710 be 1 have to meet if you want to talk.
sms
2017-05-19
10:43:28, Fri
INBOX
1 do. Ok let me hustle.
sms
2017-05-19
17:31:37, Fri
INBOX
So did convince you? ;)
sms
12
DOJ-PROD-0000342
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
Type
2017-05-19
17:40:13, Fri
INBOX
Remind me
sms
2017-05-19
23:39:47, Fri
INBOX
What about for the project?
sms
2017-05-19
Will explain why later. He thinks
23:42:10, Fri
OUTBOX
sms
2017-05-19
23:42:10, Fri
INBOX
Bill threw out 1 wasn't real excited.
sms
2017-05-19
23:44:16, Fri
OUTBOX
Nope. Me neither. No strategic thinking.
sms
2017-05-19
23:44:18, Fri
INBOX
Well that's just dumb. He heard Director Comey's statement
about what we're trying to achieve, right?\n\nAnyway. Try to not
dwell on all this. \n\nGetting stuff ready to go out the
door...\n\r U0001f60a
sms
2017-05-19
23:47:39, Fri
OUTBOX
said, immediately, that sounds like an offer you must accept.
He wants me to.
sms
2017-05-19
23:48:29, Fri
INBOX
That's really good! Im glad. That from him must be a relief for
you, right?
sms
2017-05-19
23:48:45, Fri
INBOX
1 REALLY like your 30 day idea.
sms
2017-05-19
23:49:08, Fri
OUTBOX
1 guess.
sms
2017-05-19
23:49:13, Fri
INBOX
America needs you, Lis. \U0001f60a
sms
2017-05-20
01:46:15, Sat
INBOX
sms
2017-05-20
1 Hi. How are you feeling about things?\n\n
10:04:37, Sat
*U0001f612
INBOX
sms
2017-05-21
13:16:13, Sun
INBOX
You don't have to move your office (1 mean, obviously you'll be
working out of the SC space) do you? At least you can put that
decision off for a while?\n\nYou feeling any different about it this
morning?
sms
2017-05-21
13:26:13, Sun
OUTBOX
No, 1 just need to figure out what 1 need to hand off, clean up a
little.
sms
2017-05-21
13:27:36, Sun
OUTBOX
No, I'm still really stressed out. 1 feel like an imposter. There's no
way 1 can live up to their expectations.
sms
2017-05-21
13:49:30, Sun
INBOX
Lis. You're gonna be great. Of all the things to worry about, your
competence isn't one of then. Promise.
sms
2017-05-21
13:52:05, Sun
OUTBOX
But I'm not a real lawyer anymore! They have no idea.
\U0001f615
sms
2017-05-21
13:58:08, Sun
INBOX
You have government savvy. And know the Bu. And 1C. You're
going to be great. \U0001f60a
sms
2017-05-21
14:09:52, Sun
INBOX
Did Aaron say they want you primarily for criminal prosecutor
stuff, or is that you worrying?
sms
2017-05-21
14:10:41, Sun
OUTBOX
Me worrying. But 1 have the same job that they do so 1 mean 1 feel
like it is founded.
sms
2017-05-21
14:17:33, Sun
OUTBOX
Driving to work. In business wear. Because Mueller. \U0001f610
sms
2017-05-21
14:38:08, Sun
INBOX
Oh lord. You meeting them?
sms
13
DOJ-PROD-0000343
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
Type
2017-05-21
15:22:30, Sun
INBOX
And Lisa. Aaron's time as an AUSA was about equivalent to your
OCRS time. \n\nYou bring law and knowledge they can hope to
get. It will be fine. 1 promise. You'll beam integral part of the
team before the end of the month. Promise promise promise.
You're a rock star, \U0001f60a
sms
2017-05-21
15:47:56, Sun
OUTBOX
Man, I'm frustrated re Andy and Carl. That may be the hardest
thing moving forward. Will be at the ofc for hours if you free up to
chat.
sms
2017-05-21
15:48:21, Sun
OUTBOX
Aaron did a LOT more in that time than 1 did.
sms
2017-05-21
15:50:38, Sun
INBOX
1 would be too. You shul talk with Andy about it, even of its some
time from now. But part of me really thinks should should before
\n\nOk I'll try and leave a little early,
maybe 1220 or so.\n\nAaron did different. You're going to be
solid. I'm telling you, Lisa. It's normal and appropriate to feel not
on par (I'd worry if you didn't), but you're going to be spectacular.
sms
2017-05-21
15:53:12, Sun
INBOX
Actually 1 may be able to call in a couple, standby
sms
2017-05-21
16:36:38, Sun
INBOX
Hey parking should be free after 130-140 or
so. I'll call then if you can talk.
sms
2017-05-21
17:10:26, Sun
OUTBOX
Had excellent convo with Andy. Let me know when you are done.
sms
2017-05-21
17:31:31, Sun
INBOX
Done. Just tried calling your desk.
sms
2017-05-21
17:37:36, Sun
OUTBOX
Grabbing food. One sec.
sms
2017-05-21
K. Heading home (10 out), though 1 can plan a work call later
17:39:25, Sun
on.
INBOX
sms
2017-05-21
18:15:56, Sun
OUTBOX
1 told Aaron let's see how this might goes, then decide whether it
makes sense for Bob to talk to andy.
sms
2017-05-21
18:16:32, Sun
INBOX
Might = week?
sms
2017-05-21
18:17:04, Sun
INBOX
1 think that's smart.
sms
2017-05-21
18:18:28, Sun
OUTBOX
Sorry mtg. Was an autocoreect.
sms
2017-05-21
18:18:47, Sun
OUTBOX
Except even the new phone can't correct autocorrect.
sms
2017-05-21
18:20:46, Sun
INBOX
Mtg is one you're having tomorrow? Regardless, yes, meet with
the team and get a sense if you all feel comfortable if you're on
the right path. \n\nYeah these suck *ss. Of course it's the entire
brand. died as well.
sms
2017-05-21
18:26:50, Sun
OUTBOX
I'm not in it, but a mtg with Carl and zebley and 1 think Bill.
sms
2017-05-21
18:42:18, Sun
INBOX
Tomorrow?
sms
2017-05-21
18:45:21, Sun
INBOX
Yep let's see. 1 can envision the end state following the mooting,
but let thines run their course. One thing 1 (we) know is will
not buck
sms
14
DOJ-PROD-0000344
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
Type
2017-05-21
19:02:22, Sun
INBOX
You still at wotk? Just left you a vm.
sms
2017-05-21
19:08:22, Sun
OUTBOX
Got your vm. 1 'm at my desk.
sms
2017-05-21
19:14:45, Sun
INBOX
Just tried
sms
2017-05-21
19:27:01, Sun
INBOX
Hey called again sorry 1 missed you.
sms
2017-05-21
19:33:28, Sun
OUTBOX
Sorry. Went in with Andy again.
sms
2017-05-21
19:36:56, Sun
INBOX
Np. Just staffing thoughts. 1 think Carl and Bill are too far removed
from working at that level to know. \n\nOne of the advantages 1
have from big a glorified case agent. \U0001f612
sms
2017-05-21
20:03:42, Sun
INBOX
And hey, fwiw, following the announcement of wf sac (and
assuming 1 don't get it), 1 still think 1 want to talk to Andy, if only to
discuss what you and i talked about. My worry is he's so damn
busy right now 1 don't want to impose on his time. But i AM
worried what the future holds with the dynamics changing....
sms
2017-05-23
18:28:58, Tue
OUTBOX
And I'm not sitting in on this meeting now. \U0001f612 Honestly,
I'm really not sure 1 want this. Am waiting for our team to arrive,
then I'm going to walk back and I'll call...
sms
2017-05-23
19:07:26, Tue
INBOX
Hey just missed you
sms
2017-05-23
19:07:42, Tue
INBOX
Stopped by your office, too
sms
2017-05-23
19:08:31, Tue
OUTBOX
Stay there, I'm coming up. 1 was on 4.
sms
2017-05-23
20:50:53, Tue
INBOX
Can you talk? Jon needs to cancel hpsci tomorrow so we can meet
with Bob. He's going to talk to Beth to do so.
sms
2017-05-23
21:25:44, Tue
INBOX
So this drives me nuts - just had the most collegial convo with Carl
(since 1 left your office) weird
sms
2017-05-24
00:00:00, Wed
OUTBOX
Yes, it's an honor to be asked, but so what. 1
don't want to live constantly straddling two worlds.
sms
2017-05-24
00:02:12, Wed
INBOX
That's a very valid concern. You truly will never get this time back,
ever.\n\nAnd 1 have no way to predict what the schedule will look
like. The only thing 1 can tell you is the best predictor is there past,
and both Bob and Aaron are tremendous Workaholics. Both
demanding.
sms
2017-05-24
00:02:49, Wed
INBOX
Have you had a conversation with Aaron about what his hours
have been like this past week? If he's working until 9 or 10, that
says something. If they're all leaving at 6, that says another.
sms
2017-05-24
00:03:51, Wed
INBOX
My worry is that all these attorneys that they're bringing from the
private sector will be used to long hours, because they're used to
law firm salaries. They won't mind missing the money, but will
bring that same expectation of long long hours.
sms
15
DOJ-PROD-0000345
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
Type
2017-05-24
They are working very very long hours already. And every
00:09:35, Wed
OUTBOX
weekend.
sms
2017-05-24
00:10:41, Wed
INBOX
Sigh. That's what 1 was afraid of. Are you locked in with Baker if
something happens to Andy?
sms
2017-05-24
00:18:32, Wed
OUTBOX
So long as baker stays, yes.
sms
2017-05-24
00:37:01, Wed
OUTBOX
1 really don't want to do this. 1 see myself growing more resolute
about that with this time away.
sms
2017-05-24
00:38:15, Wed
INBOX
I'm proud of you. \n\nln a million ways, I'm proud of you, and
admire you. \n\nAnd please take that in the context of me having
that pride without any obligation from you, any expectation of
needing to live up to it. anything else. Just :)
sms
2017-05-24
00:38:34, Wed
INBOX
Then all the more reason to have that time.
sms
2017-05-24
00:40:18, Wed
OUTBOX
So if you really do want to join the team, don't let my
participation stop you. Truly.
sms
2017-05-24
00:40:49, Wed
INBOX
Make sure you're weighting all your considerations honestly and
appropriately. You said tonight you want to stay and protect the
FBI. Is that true, or is it really stay and protect Andy? What if it's
Director Townsend? Staying for Andy is perfectly fine. Just be
brutally honest with yourself.
sms
2017-05-24
00:42:23, Wed
INBOX
1 don't know what 1 want, Lisa. 1 don't want to be anything but the
lead agent. And 1 think even that is going to be a far cry from the
inner sanctum of what Bob decides. 1 don't think agents will play a
significant role. 1 (or whoever) might work into that circle of trust,
but he's not going to view the lead agent the same as aaron
sms
2017-05-24
00:43:26, Wed
OUTBOX
No, but Aaron might, which would be as good as Bob doing it.
sms
2017-05-24
00:52:12, Wed
INBOX
1 guess. Still. 1 would likely retire out of that job. No way its done
in
sms
2017-05-24
01:03:01, Wed
OUTBOX
Could 1 have oca get Brennan's testimony and send it to you?
Then you provide to SC?
sms
2017-05-24
01:05:38, Wed
INBOX
Just talked to Andy. 1 have to go in now and meet the AG with him
and Bill.
sms
2017-05-24
01:08:41, Wed
OUTBOX
Now? Like, tonight?
sms
2017-05-24
01:09:43, Wed
INBOX
Yes. Talk?
sms
2017-05-24
02:55:06, Wed
INBOX
Well that was fun. AG had leave "because he wasn't on the
list." \U0001f62e That'll help my relationship with him...
sms
2017-05-24
02:55:25, Wed
INBOX
It's what we speculated
sms
2017-05-24
03:09:32, Wed
OUTBOX
Hell, that's not your fault. I'm headed to bed. Good luck with
everything tomorrow.
sms
2017-05-24
03:10:59, Wed
INBOX
True, it's not. Surreal, chapter #832.\n\nSleep well, Lisa.:)
sms
2017-05-24
09:30:56, Wed
INBOX
Hi there.\n\nOne more observation from last night - a
snake.
sms
16
DOJ-PROD-0000346
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
Type
2017-05-24
09:50:24, Wed
OUTBOX
Absolutely, yes. I'm curious to know why you say that. I'm at the
airport. Lines are unlike any I've ever seen. Not sure why.
sms
2017-05-24
16:27:37, Wed
Hi\n\nHad a somewhat detailed convo about structure with Bob
andaaronand (who is on steroids). They're
envisioning You are above
INBOX
that handling all leg affairs, assume reporting direct into Bob and
leadership.
sms
2017-05-24
16:29:05, Wed
OUTBOX
Hmm.
sms
2017-05-24
16:29:23, Wed
OUTBOX
Will call you once 1 am at the gate.
sms
2017-05-24
17:07:17, Wed
OUTBOX
Hey did you get the Brennan transcript to Aaron?
sms
2017-05-24
17:09:05, Wed
OUTBOX
Never mind, 1 just sent it to him.
sms
2017-05-24
18:06:16, Wed
INBOX
No 1 hadn't. Thanks.
sms
2017-05-29
23:20:26, Mon
INBOX
NYTimes: A Constitutional Puzzle: Can the President Be
lndicted?\nA Constitutional Puzzle: Can the President Be
Indicted? https://nyti.ms/2scC27a
sms
2017-05-31
00:38:22, Wed
OUTBOX
You going to give az a heads up tonight?
sms
2017-05-31
00:43:50, Wed
INBOX
Oh, he was there. Standby on imsg
sms
2017-05-31
03:10:00, Wed
OUTBOX
Asked me at the end whether 1 would be willing to serve in a
similar role as 1 have for Andy. It frankly makes more sense than
conf. affairs. Let's talk though. Also, please clear.
sms
2017-06-01
00:53:04, Thu
OUTBOX
Btw andy called me earlier but 1 was at and
couldn't talk. Our plan is to talk tomorrow. Good sign that he is
reaching out 1 think.
sms
2017-06-01
01:06:05, Thu
INBOX
Gosh 1 hope so. 1 was having some regret that 1 didn't tell him
what 1 was currently thinking
sms
2017-06-01
01:09:41, Thu
OUTBOX
I'm sure he's calling to follow up from my text yesterday in light of
Bob's call today. \n\nTo be clear, if he asks about you I'm going to
say you're always a benefit to the team, but that the team will be
okay withoutyou.
sms
2017-06-01
01:15:14, Thu
INBOX
Is that the right answer re me? It may be true, but I'm reassessing
what the hell 1 want right now. 1 don't have a great feeling about
the big bureau right now and my role (and others perception of
that) in it, and the SC seems like a tangible, worthwhile effort to
do before 1 retire.
sms
2017-06-01
01:16:50, Thu
INBOX
What do you think 1 should do?
sms
2017-06-01
01:19:30, Thu
OUTBOX
1 think you should stay the course. But 1 will talk to Andy honestly
about and future and all that.
sms
17
DOJ-PROD-0000347
Date UTC
2017-06-01
01:23:35, Thu
Type of Message
2017-06-01
01:44:36, Thu
2017-06-01
02:05:56, Thu
2017-06-01
02:20:26, Thu
2017-06-01
02:25:27, Thu
2017-06-01
02:25:56, Thu
2017-06-01
02:34:23, Thu
2017-06-01
02:36:40, Thu
2017-06-01
10:09:59, Thu
INBOX
UNBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
Is Andy truly accepting of the fact of the potential limitations that
he may not be DD as long as he thought, and regardless, that we'll
have a new D, as all this unfolds?\n\nBtw, Bill said he heard some
guy in INSD was ranked #2 for the job. Someone we interviewed
for a SC job in CD and turned down. Truly I don't know wtf is going
on. Do I have cognitive dissonance?
Look, here's the bottom line as best as I can sum up (and I hope
you already know all this)\n\n-1 don't think Andy's acting in bad
faith. I do think what he hypothetically proposes isn't something
in his thought process or skillset or his available time and ability.
In other words, when JG or Randy or even Bob said they had a
plan, they had a PLAN. I don't think Andy does. And as A/D that's
something too small for him to worry about. To put a fine point on
it Wtf. Such a pin to the balloon of faith and confidence in
the system, \n\n-1 knew my standing with Comey and Andy. One
is gone, the other uncertain at best, \n\n-1 don't trust/believe in
my standing with Daveand Carl and the rest of the EADs.\n\n-the
SC is straightforward and rewarding, meaningful, honorable and a
known quantity. It would cement my image as the "special project
guy" or "glorified case agent" (nevermind they'll never see
that way for doing the same job less well). I guess I’m
feeling like I don't care about that right now. But it's not like i
have a long time left.
I understand all this. So what do you want me to say to him? Can I
lay out this thinking, attributes to me?_:
I don't know. \n\nMaybe i should sleep on it.\n\nMaybe, Pete's
uncertain, between Comey the he's reassessing if he should
just go?\n\nl don't know, Lis.
We can talk in the morning.
But I think that's a perfectly reasonable way to approach it.
Thank you \U0001f636
Sorry I don't have a ready answer here. I feel strongly - if
ambiguously - at the same time I want to represent myself at the
same time I don't want to be "that guy."\n\nNone of us are owed
anything. Except when I think of the last 18 months. \n\nAnd then
I think several of us ARE owed something.
Hi. \n\nThe only additional thought I had is it's not tenable to
have both me and :here. If he's in charge and I'm around, it
undermines him (because Mueller and Aaron will be looking to
me), it puts me in a horrible position, and it's a waste of Bureau
resources. I told Bill that, but in don't know that will get up from
INBOX
IS
DOJ-PROD-0000348
Date UTC
Type of Message
2017-06-01
10:14:34, Thu
OUTBOX
2017-06-01
10:16:51, Thu
OUTBOX
2017-06-01
10:16:59, Thu
INBOX
2017-06-01
10:21:01, Thu
INBOX
2017-06-01
10:22:01, Thu
INBOX 1
2017-06-01
10:22:03, Thu
OUTBOX
2017-06-01
10:22:21, Thu
INBOX
2017-06-01
10:23:20, Thu
OUTBOX
2017-06-01
10:25:12, Thu
INBOX
2017-06-01
10:25:50, Thu
OUTBOX
2017-06-01
10:30:40, Thu
INBOX
2017-06-01
10:31:15, Thu
INBOX
2017-06-01
10:32:00, Thu
OUTBOX
2017-06-01
10:32:06, Thu
INBOX
2017-06-01
10:32:44, Thu
OUTBOX
2017-06-01
10:33:55, Thu
INBOX
Body _'
Yeah, 1 definitely plan to do that.
I'm growing more doubtful about my role staying on. For the
same reason you're not absolutely essential once 30 or 45 days is
up, I'm not absolutely essential. You don't need someone to see
around corners and check for pitfalls when you have the most all-
star of all-star teams. I mean sure, might a catch a ball or two?
Maybe. But not like the value I add at HQ when it's mostly not aII-
slars._■
Thanks. Really curious to hear what he's thinking.
I hear you. But a couple of things. First, I really truly believe you're
not giving yourself enough credit for how good you are. Depends
on what you want. At the Bu, you'll be a superstar amongst
mostly not all-stars. There, you're a superstar amongst
superstars.\n\nSecond, be really honest, what is your future at
the Bureau? As long as Andy is A/D, you're in a weird place with JR
and I don't know what his future is when a D is confirmed.
Nor do I know Bakers future.
And in terms of launching into the private sector, it's FAR
On the flip side, I probably wouldn't want to be
not with
|Thi s is all true. But do I want this enough if my job is
I honestlyjust don't see much of a role working for Bob/Aaron.
They don't really need me. I'm happy to shag issues, but I don't
really see that happening. Aaron doesn't give up much.
That's definitely true re Aaron. I don't know if you'll be part of the
true inner core, especially when they're fully staffed. Nor whoever
the lead fbi person is. _
So then what am I doing there? Just padding my resume?
Doing something meaningful, historic
And yes, making contacts and superbly positioning yourself for
whatever comes next
Meh. Not if I'm the least impressive among the most impressive
brains in America.
Sorry was reading Carrie Johnson tweet and thread about Andrew
being added to the team
Send it please? He must have told her - they're close.
Lisa. I don't think that's true. You won't be least impressive. You
(and/or i, if I go) will solidly hold our own. Thats more than
enough for you when it's all done. And that group will forever take
take of itself. Look at the Enron crew._
19
DOJ-PROD-0000349
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
Type
2017-06-01
10:34:28, Thu
OUTBOX
Yeah, maybe.
sms
2017-06-01
22:48:19, Thu
INBOX
and 1 thought Jim (maybe you too but i couldnt read that)
was cranky. Was that from your convo before?
sms
2017-06-01
22:50:55, Thu
INBOX
Argued with him along the lines of what 1 assume you did. 1 get his
unanticipated consequences arguments, but 1 think it strains
logic.\n\nAnyway. Sorry that review made you late.
sms
2017-06-01
22:51:54, Thu
OUTBOX
1 didn't think Jim was cranky. Probablyjust tired because he was
just on an hours long panel on 702. 1 thought YOU were cranky.
sms
2017-06-01
22:53:31, Thu
INBOX
Oh. \n\nAmd really? Im sorry. Just felt really strongly on that one
early point. Was 1 a jerky? If so, 1 apologize. :(
sms
2017-06-01
22:54:44, Thu
OUTBOX
No, you just get that weird defensive way that isn't really
appropriate fora colleague but whatever.
sms
2017-06-01
23:11:24, Thu
INBOX
Sorry, 1 didn't notice. Was just worked up about it. 1 did note your
"can 1 finish" which 1 now assume might have been driven by that
perception. Anyway, sorry. I'll watch out for it.\n\r
sms
2017-06-01
23:49:32, Thu
INBOX
delayed reaction to made me laugh. \n\nFwiw, 1 got no
further on the structure argument than i think you did. Even made
the shifting organizational risk argument.
sms
2017-06-02
00:09:00, Fri
INBOX
1 just sang your praises to Aaron. \U0001f60a Too long to explain
here.
sms
2017-06-02
00:11:44, Fri
INBOX
Ha. Aaron just called (but had to answer another call), said he had
talked to you on one of the issues...not sure what but will call
back.
sms
2017-06-02
00:16:22, Fri
OUTBOX
Re the mtg tomorrow. Not clear now which subj (which is his
Question 1 am guessing) but either way wants to attend
which is an issue.
sms
2017-06-02
00:16:47, Fri
OUTBOX
le.
sms
2017-06-02
00:17:40, Fri
INBOX
Hmm. 1 hearc What did you hear?
sms
2017-06-02
00:17:51, Fri
INBOX
And from who? Mine came from Paul
sms
2017-06-02
00:18:13, Fri
OUTBOX
Wait 1 forget the codename.
sms
2017-06-02
00:18:28, Fri
OUTBOX
Oh yes.
sms
2017-06-02
00:18:40, Fri
OUTBOX
He thought maybe someone else
sms
2017-06-02
00:20:46, Fri
INBOX
Who's saying wants to attend?
sms
2017-06-02
00:21:28, Fri
OUTBOX
Tash said called her said nvited them.
sms
20
DOJ-PROD-0000350
Date UTC
2017-06-02
00:41:10, Fri
Type of Message
2017-06-02
00:41:32, Fri
2017-06-02
00:43:47, Fri
2017-06-02
01:18:19, Fri
2017-06-02
13:46:27, Fri
2017-06-02
13:47:23, Fri
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
Body _ _ Type
Yeah just talked to aaron, he relayed same. is Peking this
ALL up. I think Paul A gets it and Andy's intent (or at least he made
statements to Carl about it in front of me), but word most
certainly is not getting down the chain. \n\nYou've now GOTTA
come to this sh*t show of a brief tomorrow.
sms
That is not, however, the topic insane your praises about.
\U0001f60a sms
So what'd you say? I need to have a convo next week about my
role. If Aaron let me be an extension of him, I think I could really
helohim. sms
In other not fun news, one of the admin ladies
Isaid Aaron asked each of us to submit a resume for their records.
2017-06-02
01:20:41, Fri
INBOX
Hahaha. That makes me laugh for some reason. I'll help.
\U0001f60a
2017-06-02
01:20:52, Fri
INBOX
Universe talking to you, Page.
2017-06-02
01:24:09, Fri
OUTBOX
Btw, 1 meant to point out to you today, you used the expression
"horse sense" in reference to "any agent's horse sense will tell
them x..." See? Horse sense. It's an expression for a reason...:)
2017-06-02
01:25:02, Fri
INBOX
Ha. You're absolutely right. 1 had no notion of doing it when 1 did
2017-06-02
01:49:02, Fri
INBOX
Aaron said he was going to talk to Carl tomorrow. 1 told him that,
some call he had with these are the 10-14
days of hurt feelings and tears. At the point of moving past nice,
iust saving how it is.
2017-06-02
10:54:20, Fri
OUTBOX
Think we are having the 9:15 this am?
2017-06-02
10:54:46, Fri
INBOX
We're not. Was going to ask if you want to walk over.
2017-06-02
10:56:23, Fri
OUTBOX
Have to do the class review doc first.
2017-06-02
13:37:36, Fri
INBOX
And 1 just picked up on what you said when you answered the
phone. What were/are you talking about?
2017-06-02
13:38:15, Fri
OUTBOX
SC job vs staying
2017-06-02
13:39:21, Fri
INBOX
What does he think - yes for you, no for me?
2017-06-02
13:44:32, Fri
OUTBOX
Torn like 1 am. Agrees that andy and you need to talk.
I am too, Lis. Kind of really depends on that conversation you have
with Aaron.\n\r running late with Bill. I'll call you when I'm
done. Fiaven't heard back from Aaron, maybe we just walk over
(again) _
So is Bill free? I have a rO second question
OUTBOX
21
DOJ-PROD-0000351
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
Type
2017-06-02
13:48:06, Fri
INBOX
No - he switched meeting times with me because he has to run to
State. Amd now he's late.
sms
2017-06-02
16:43:26, Fri
INBOX
You free?
sms
2017-06-02
16:51:31, Fri
INBOX
Talking to We need to talk
sms
2017-06-02
16:58:10, Fri
OUTBOX
Sorry, just found my phone. Not much to do right now re
but okay.
sms
2017-06-02
17:53:17, Fri
INBOX
Two redactions 1 need to doscuss, let me know when you're back
sms
2017-06-02
19:34:27, Fri
INBOX
Please call me before you leave SC
sms
2017-06-02
19:39:25, Fri
OUTBOX
Am at desk here
sms
2017-06-02
21:12:14, Fri
INBOX
Thanks for bringing those two things back. :)
sms
2017-06-02
21:42:44, Fri
INBOX
You still here? 1 have hill contact dates for you
sms
2017-06-02
22:15:20, Fri
INBOX
1 talked with Aaron, call me if you can
sms
2017-06-02
22:23:50, Fri
OUTBOX
Will call you on the way home. Got a drink with baker. Needed his
good counsel.
sms
2017-06-02
22:24:09, Fri
OUTBOX
Talked to him about you too, so he's going to think about it and
will reach out.
sms
2017-06-02
22:25:25, Fri
INBOX
Man 1 can NEVER get him to go out. I've got thal jealousy
you mentioned.;)
sms
2017-06-02
23:23:46, Fri
OUTBOX
Hope things are okay. Please do what you think is best re job.
Don't sweat me. I'll just have to talk to about it if the decision
presents itself.
sms
2017-06-02
23:42:36, Fri
INBOX
What do you want. Don't think. What's your immediate gut?
sms
2017-06-02
23:47:10, Fri
INBOX
1 can probably talk in 10 min or so
sms
2017-06-02
23:50:32, Fri
OUTBOX
1 really don’t know. Jim got me squarely back into support sc, but
that changes minute by minute.
sms
2017-06-02
1 would love to, but not sure 1 can.
23:50:50, Fri
OUTBOX
sms
2017-06-02
23:52:37, Fri
INBOX
Got it. \n\nl think where 1 am is exactly what YOU thought.
\U0001f636\n\nl can only take this up to a point. After that,
Mueller and the bright attorneys will drive it, not me.
sms
2017-06-02
23:53:53, Fri
INBOX
W/r/tyou, 1 think it's a bit different. 1 think you will be a trusted
part of the team, but maybe never in the core leadership. BUT,
because you're an attorney, this is an entirely different
developmental opportunity. This helps you immeasurably in your
future legal career.
sms
2017-06-03
00:02:02, Sat
OUTBOX
Yes, I'm sure that is true.
sms
2017-06-03
00:06:12, Sat
INBOX
How will your ego be if you end up working as a more "junior"
attorney in this? (Not saying you will, just think that's the unlikely
worst case for vou).
sms
22
DOJ-PROD-0000352
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
Type
2017-06-03
00:12:08, Sat
OUTBOX
1 talked about that with Jim. He has a nice way of framing that I'm
not there to compeat with so don't try to write some
magnificent appellate brief.
sms
2017-06-03
00:17:19, Sat
OUTBOX
And let's face it, 1 WILL be a junior attorney. We've got the
freaking titans of law joining this thing.
sms
2017-06-03
00:19:50, Sat
INBOX
Exactly. 1 see that. 1 wanted to see if you saw the same. And if
you're comfortable maybe coming off the bench on the all star
team rather than being one of the star starters on team FBI.
sms
2017-06-03
00:22:07, Sat
OUTBOX
Ha. Jim had a similar analogy. You might not be on the line, but
there are a lot of people who are necessary to keep the team on
the field.
sms
2017-06-03
00:22:18, Sat
INBOX
You haven't asked, but 1 think you should go. It is an experience
unlike any other you're going to get. Life changing. \n\nThats the
ONLY thing seriously keeping me considering it.
sms
2017-06-03
00:22:54, Sat
OUTBOX
1 know you are right.
sms
2017-06-03
00:23:45, Sat
OUTBOX
It's just hard to be untethered to the Bureau and Andy right now.
It's been bad enough without Comey, this just feels like another
loss.
sms
2017-06-03
00:24:06, Sat
INBOX
Well i knew he was smart. \U0001f609\n\nTo my question: how
do you feel when they call the meeting, not just Mueller aaron
and Quarles, but a couple of attorneys, but not you?
sms
2017-06-03
00:24:44, Sat
INBOX
Oh this project? You'll feel am integral part of a family team
before the 4th of July. You'll be working too hard not to.
sms
2017-06-03
00:26:10, Sat
And therein's the rub. How much have you enjoyed your
INBOX
\n\nMy biggest drawback is I'm just am agent on an
attornev-driven team.
sms
2017-06-03
00:27:01, Sat
INBOX
1 want to talk to Baker. I'm curious how he addresses the not
being part of the true leadership team at the end of the day, how 1
have a greater potential to give in the FBI.
sms
2017-06-03
00:34:25, Sat
OUTBOX
1 won't like it one bit. Jim says 1 need to be patient, that 1 will earn
their trust and make it into the room eventually.
sms
2017-06-03
00:40:11, Sat
INBOX
1 wouldn't either.
sms
2017-06-03
00:41:08, Sat
INBOX
And 1 completely get your feeling of untethered, of yet another
loss.
sms
2017-06-03
00:41:28, Sat
INBOX
But Andy's going right around the corner. In a blink of an eye.
sms
2017-06-03
00:47:57, Sat
OUTBOX
And what does SC do to your
sms
2017-06-03
Watcha doing?\n\nl've lost all motivation. Didn't edit - let alone
01:54:35, Sat
send - email to Jim.
INBOX
sms
23
DOJ-PROD-0000353
Date UTC Type of Message I Body I Type
2017-06-03
01:54:59, Sat | displays on my work iPhone and I never cleared.!
OUTBOX sms
2017-06-03
01:55:46, Sat
OUTBOX
Why not send It? Jim cares about you. Jim only pays the attention
that he does to me because I'm pushy and 1 show up.
sms
2017-06-03
02:16:02, Sat
INBOX
Well 1 don't want to do it now, it's late. Let me make the edit and
re-send to you. \n\nl'm sorry about the imsg. Thats good to know
about the lock screen.
sms
2017-06-03
03:31:31, Sat
INBOX
1 get more uncertain as time goes on.\n\nYou get shy more
clarity?
sms
2017-06-03
03:31:56, Sat
INBOX
Any not shy
sms
2017-06-03
11:13:04, Sat
INBOX
This is turning out to be a really hard decision. Are you settling on
one place or another?
sms
2017-06-03
11:31:36, Sat
INBOX
Because I'm really torn. 1 thought sleep would help, but nope. 1
guess I'm still leaning don't go. \n\nWhere are you with you?
sms
2017-06-03
11:42:34, Sat
OUTBOX
I'm just going to stay for now, do what they want me to do.
sms
2017-06-03
11:47:19, Sat
INBOX
Good!
sms
2017-06-03
11:48:00, Sat
INBOX
You feeling at peace with that?
sms
2017-06-03
11:51:36, Sat
OUTBOX
No, but I'm going to try to get there.
sms
2017-06-03
11:53:10, Sat
INBOX
1 get it.
sms
2017-06-03
11:53:37, Sat
INBOX
And you need to tell me one last time it's not presumptuous to
email JB...
sms
2017-06-03
11:58:44, Sat
OUTBOX
It is not. You can even tell him 1 told you to email jim.
sms
2017-06-03
12:00:40, Sat
INBOX
Well, 1 sent it. And promptly realized 1 forgot to change "this
evening" to "yesterday." \U0001f612
sms
2017-06-03
16:16:35, Sat
INBOX
And no response from Jim and 1 feel foolish...maybe it's the
universe, along with you, telling me to stay the course...
sms
2017-06-03
16:32:21, Sat
OUTBOX
He almost never checks on the weekend. Wait until the evening.
And stop worrying. He cares about you.
sms
2017-06-03
16:35:12, Sat
INBOX
Ok \U0001f636
sms
2017-06-03
16:35:19, Sat
INBOX
Thank you
sms
2017-06-03
20:20:12, Sat
OUTBOX
Well offically been invited to the 5:00 now...
\U0001f615
sms
2017-06-03
20:21:44, Sat
INBOX
5 is today? That's more than I've heard...any FBI there?
sms
2017-06-03
20:21:59, Sat
INBOX
Agents, 1 mean
sms
24
DOJ-PROD-0000354
Date UTC
2017-06-03
20:22:35, Sat
2017-06-03
20:24:13, Sat
2017-06-03
20:24:34, Sat
2017-06-03
20:25:00, Sat
2017-06-03
20:25:38, Sat
2017-06-03
20:25 :44, Sat
2017-06-03
20:26:14, Sat
2017-06-03
20:26:56, Sat
2017-06-03
20:27:06, Sat
2017-06-03
20:27:48, Sat
2017-06-03
20:27:48, Sat
2017-06-03
20:28:17, Sat
2017-06-03
20:28:26, Sat
2017-06-03
20:28:50, Sat
2017-06-03
20:29:04, Sat
2017-06-03
20:29:35, Sat
2017-06-03
20:31:53, Sat
2017-06-03
20:33:42, Sat
2017-06-03
20:34:30, Sat
2017-06-03
20:39:16, Sat
2017-06-03
20:40:44, Sat
2017-06-03
20:44:50, Sat
Type of Message
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
Or you mean the daily 5s?\n\nlf it makes you feel any better, I've
had no calls and no emails since Aaron yesterday at 530.
The daily 5:00s.
Oh. Have those started?
I haven't heard anything about them. I was just going to show up.
asked me where I substantively want to land on the team. I
just don't know the answer. Maybe under Andrew on
At least I know him. _
How did you find out? From him?\n\nThough I confess this is
steering me fi rmly on to th e sta y th e cours e path. _
I'm guessing you haven't been invited because they don't want it
to be if you leave. Yea, the y ha pp en every day. _
I'm at SC. Had a mtg with az, and at 1:30.
Is "chief of staff" or "assistant to Aaron" tenable? \n\nAaron told
me they were going to have them. Just hadn't heard they had
started.
Any agents around?\n\nl'm telling you, this may cement it for me.
He asked to start coming to them at the end of our
meeting._
Any indication to you about whether or not he wanted you there?
In the ofc? No. But that doesn't mean. They're not working at hq.
I'd do or If you can't do some
leadership elemen t thing _
He certainly didn't tell me to start showing up, so I didn't ask.
I still think it's ultimately OK for you even if you're on the bench.
But you ego's gonna need some TLC. _
Yeah, tell me about it. \U0001f614
Think of it this way - coming down off of DD staff to this is a HELL
of a lot better than coming down to OGC somewhere....
But no doubt about it, it sucks. I can feel MY urge to want in, right
now, even though I'm in some non-committed tdy limbo.
How long are you staying? Will people be around if I stop by
before the Valor game? (That'll impress the hell.out of them!)
I'm at hq now, but JQ and AW are there.
I wouldn't be there for another hour, plus I doubt my card works.
25
DOJ-PROD-0000355
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
Type
2017-06-03
20:55:58, Sat
INBOX
Do you want to be Andrew? Why not with where
there are at and you might get assigned
one?\n\nBut 1 don't know. Thats a tough call.
sms
2017-06-03
21:00:35, Sat
OUTBOX
I'm scared of Andrew is at least a known quantity? 1
don't know...
sms
2017-06-03
21:18:22, Sat
INBOX
Yeah 1 know. though. Plus you
know Cl better than all of theattys....
sms
2017-06-03
21:21:11, Sat
INBOX
Driving if you can talk.
sms
2017-06-03
21:21:40, Sat
INBOX
Truly that might be your niche - work the
sms
2017-06-03
21:21:46, Sat
INBOX
Angle
sms
2017-06-03
23:05:51, Sat
OUTBOX
Crap! 1 forgot my eras. \U0001f62l\U0001f62l\U0001f621
sms
2017-06-03
Dude. It's all unclassified
23:06:18, Sat
INBOX
sms
2017-06-03
23:06:37, Sat
INBOX
Type on home computer and email to yourself.
sms
2017-06-03
Okay. But it would help to have what 1 wrote. But fair enough.
23:06:58, Sat
OUTBOX
sms
2017-06-03
23:07:04, Sat
INBOX
Subj in custody, btw. First ML arrest of the Trump era
sms
2017-06-03
Yeah.
23:08:09, Sat
IINDUA |
sms
2017-06-03
23:12:34, Sat
OUTBOX
sms
2017-06-04
01:13:36, Sun
INBOX
I'm trying to write an email back to but don't know what to
say after, thanks for the heads up. How would you finish that
email?
sms
2017-06-04
Maybe just hope this gets resolved soon? 1 have no idea.
01:15:06, Sun
OUTBOX
sms
2017-06-04
01:17:15, Sun
OUTBOX
I'm going to mention
And I'm going to tell him nas to grow a pair and start
correcting people when they say Andy.
sms
2017-06-04
01:20:42, Sun
INBOX
Yep
sms
2017-06-04
01:21:23, Sun
INBOX
He just needs to send a message. Amd needs to stand up
and get people in line. Thats his job, not JR's.
sms
2017-06-04
Please, when you get a chance, plug with Aaron all the behind the
01:25:27, Sun
OUTBOX
scenes work 1 did with Andy, Jim, etc. to get this result. Andy was
NOT going to do it just based on Mueller's convo with him - he
just didn't understand what the problem was. AND 1 did a lot of
work to help them understand that was also not the right
guv.
sms
2017-06-04
01:25:42, Sun
OUTBOX
Thank you. \U0001f636
sms
2017-06-04
Of course 1 will. \U0001f636
01:26:36, Sun
INBOX
sms
26
DOJ-PROD-0000356
Date UTC
2017-06-04
01:29:37, Sun
2017-06-04
01:29:39, Sun
2017-06-04
01:29:42, Sun
2017-06-04
01:35:17, Sun
2017-06-04
01:35:20, Sun
2017-06-04
01:35:44,Sun
2017-06-04
01:39:15, Sun
2017-06-04
01:40:57, Sun
2017-06-04
01:49:57, Sun
2017-06-04
15:38:29, Sun
2017-06-04
17:12:33, Sun
2017-06-04
17:45:04 , Sun
2017-06-05
01:25:56, Mon
2017-06-05
01:27:40, Mon
2017-06-05
01:29:20, Mon
2017-06-05
01:29:46, Mon
2017-06-05
01 :35 :31, Mon
2017-06-05
01:40:42, Mon
2017-06-05
01:40:58, Mon
2017-06-05
01:41:39, Mon
2017-06-05
01:41:59, Mon
2017-06-05
01:43:12, Mon
Type of Message
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
I worry they think I'm too loyal to Andy or Comey, won't truly
trust me because of that. Maybe this will help.
I dunno.
I wouldn't worry about that
Just be you
That will be enough \U0001f60a\U0001f636
It hasn't been yet.
This is true. \n\nAnd I don't think it's that they don't trust you
because of Andy or Comey. I think they just don't trust, generally.
You will work your way in. Patience. _
And sigh. Ok. \n\nDon't worry too much about Mueller and
Aaron. You're gong to be ok. :) _
Just talked to Jim for 40 minutes. He's a good man. He strongly
thinks I shou ld go. _
He is an incredibly good man.
So did you ever get an invite to tomorrow strategy mtg? And
Aaron ever call you back?_
Yeah me too, re tired. \n\nAaron did call. Think it's still a little
early for the strategy meeting, so will just do the ops update
followed by the oca/OPA wrap _
I talked through what he'd envision were I to stay. I asked what
my role would be, especially in terms of the leadership group. He
thought i would be, but wanted to confirm with RM.
Looks like all hands svtcon Tues and strategy meeting eitherTues
or Wed.
He ask you to stay for oca/ops wrap?
Super.\n\nl'm glad for you at least.
INBOX
And morning meetings, but not tomorrow so he can run past RM.
He said those have been largely admin in nature._
So you joining the team? I need to talk to if so.
I don't know.
I told him I wanted to be part of the leadership team if I stayed,
because otherwise i didn't know if it would be worth it for
me.\n\nl think we do 30 and try things on for size, which I guess
was the plan an
27
DOJ-PROD-0000357
Date UTC
2017-06-05
01:44:56, Mon
2017-06-05
01:49:32, Mon
2017-06-05
01:56:04, Mon
Type of Message
INBOX _
OUTBOX
Let's see what RM says first. If it's not going to work out, then no
npprl to pn thprp
t'll be fine.
I
My sense is ft will be. All of this is based on earned trust from
competence, anyway. I'd have the advantage of being the senior
bureau person, which also helps.\n\nl want to talk to you again,
obviously. I was surprised how strong and unanimous both JB and
Bill were. And if I do after all that, need to talk to Andy.
I don't want to go to sleep, because if I do, then next thing I'll
wake up and it will be time for work :( _
At least at a job in which you're wanted.
Hi there. They do want you, Lisa. Just gotta figure your spot.
Right
You going to talk to Aaron about it? Or just dive in and see what
o rganical ly develops? _
That's starting to seem a little pushy and desperate.
Yeah I agree. So the latter, then. I'm tellingyou, you'll prove your
worth a thousand times, quickly. \n\nGod there are like a million
extra bird and nature sounds. Not sure what's up this morning..
2017-06-05
13:28:16, Mon
OUTBOX
1 will.
sms
2017-06-05
13:29:11, Mon
INBOX
I'm frustrated. 1 know you must be too.
sms
2017-06-05
13:47:55, Mon
INBOX
Hey are you still on phone ? np if so, just want to know whether to
hang or not. Have a couple of things for you then 1 need to hit
bubble and SC.
sms
28
DOJ-PROD-0000358
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
Type
2017-06-05
13:51:57, Mon
OUTBOX
1 am with You coming to 10 am?
sms
2017-06-05
13:53:21, Mon
INBOX
Shit
sms
2017-06-05
13:53:24, Mon
INBOX
Yes. Where?
sms
2017-06-05
13:53:55, Mon
OUTBOX
You can skip it. Ogc conf. Room. I'm not even sure oca is coming.
sms
2017-06-05
13:55:36, Mon
INBOX
Got some things 1 need to run past you, I’ll com
sms
2017-06-05
13:55:38, Mon
INBOX
Come
sms
2017-06-05
16:45:28, Mon
OUTBOX
Checking out.
sms
2017-06-05
16:46:50, Mon
INBOX
Rgr
sms
2017-06-05
18:44:10, Mon
INBOX
So this great. Walked over here around 2, they're all in a meeting
(1 think) and I've been kind of sitting/waiting. \U0001f612
sms
2017-06-05
19:00:42, Mon
OUTBOX
Let me talk to SC about 1 just spoke to Rybicki about
them and where things stand.
sms
2017-06-05
19:01:41, Mon
1 just talked to Aaron. He said lift
other words,
INBOX
sms
2017-06-05
19:02:13, Mon
OUTBOX
Call me?
sms
2017-06-05
19:05:06, Mon
INBOX
Hey so are you gong to come over in between? If so, I'll wait to
talk to Aaron until you get here.
sms
2017-06-05
19:05:31, Mon
OUTBOX
Yes, going to leave momentarily.
sms
2017-06-05
19:10:13, Mon
INBOX
Ok bring . Just talked to we can
conference call her and mark it up, then get it to Bill for stamp.
Put a cover EC and put them in the file.
sms
2017-06-05
21:23:19, Mon
INBOX
And for now, I'm not in the 5:00s...\U0001f612...Aaron told him
he recommended yes, but no answer yet.
sms
2017-06-05
22:45:27, Mon
INBOX
Hey you still at work? I'm finishing up with Aaron. He's trying to
call Scott S now
sms
2017-06-05
22:46:03, Mon
INBOX
And has an office, you better try and hop on one quick
sms
2017-06-05
22:46:32, Mon
OUTBOX
1 am still here. I'll hit you up shortly.
sms
2017-06-05
22:47:04, Mon
INBOX
Ok I'm in Aarons office, if 1 don't answer that's why
sms
2017-06-05
22:47:22, Mon
OUTBOX
Should 1 come over?
sms
2017-06-05
22:47:53, Mon
INBOX
Don't think so, 1 think I'm about to head out.
sms
2017-06-05
22:52:37, Mon
OUTBOX
In with baker.
sms
29
DOJ-PROD-0000359
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
Type
2017-06-05
22:53:18, Mon
INBOX
Hey Aaron asked what your second issue was - we both
remember op ed/pre-pub review. Can we conference call you?
sms
2017-06-05
22:53:35, Mon
OUTBOX
I'm in with baker.
sms
2017-06-05
22:53:53, Mon
OUTBOX
Was re Stephen Kelly sitting in closed with comey.
sms
2017-06-05
22:53:57, Mon
OUTBOX
Not a big deal.
sms
2017-06-05
22:54:09, Mon
OUTBOX
But need to talk to.him about foia too
sms
2017-06-05
22:55:07, Mon
INBOX
Yep. Do you want to conference call, come over, talk tomorrow?
Why don't 1 propose meeting a little bit before the 10?
sms
2017-06-05
22:55:17, Mon
INBOX
That wayjust all walk up...
sms
2017-06-05
22:56:39, Mon
INBOX
Ok, so just proposed to aaron we meet at 945 in my
office.\n\nSolved!\n\n:l I've sot you....
sms
2017-06-05
23:11:18, Mon
INBOX
Heading back call me whenever
sms
2017-06-05
23:17:29, Mon
OUTBOX
1 can't talk right now. I'll call you back shortly.
sms
2017-06-05
23:30:22, Mon
INBOX
Hey I'm getting ready to leave. If you're finishing, I'll sit tight,
otherwise call me on cell.
sms
2017-06-05
23:36:03, Mon
OUTBOX
In with Andy, leaving now
sms
2017-06-05
23:36:40, Mon
INBOX
K 1 'm still here. You leaving leaving or just going back to office?
sms
2017-06-05
23:47:05, Mon
OUTBOX
Office. Headed there now.
sms
2017-06-06
01:01:40, Tue
INBOX
Clear imsg...
sms
2017-06-06
01:36:59, Tue
INBOX
Boo where'd you go?
sms
2017-06-06
01:47:16, Tue
OUTBOX
Sorry, this was in my lit bag. Still at work.
sms
2017-06-06
01:48:11, Tue
OUTBOX
Aaron and were here reading Aaron asked if you
would be willing to take a copy to Bob tomorrow am when you
get in. He gets in around 730/745.
sms
2017-06-06
01:48:20, Tue
INBOX
Oh Jesus. Really? You get to.talk to aaron?
sms
2017-06-06
01:49:04, Tue
INBOX
Marked?\n\nWe get an answer, re ?
sms
2017-06-06
01:49:15, Tue
INBOX
Guessing yes since they were reading them
sms
2017-06-06
01:49:28, Tue
OUTBOX
Yes marked. Yes to the SC team, no answer yet re
sms
2017-06-06
01:52:35, Tue
INBOX
Sorry i missed it, interested in their thoughts / reaction. \n\nl'l! be
there at 730 with a copy for him.
sms
2017-06-06
01:52:44, Tue
INBOX
They say anything?
sms
30
DOJ-PROD-0000360
Date UTC
Type of Message
2017-06-06
01:54:11, Tue
OUTBOX
2017-06-06
01:56:49, Tue
INBOX
2017-06-06
01:57:52, Tue
OUTBOX
2017-06-06
01:59:09, Tue
INBOX
2017-06-06
02:00:07, Tue
OUTBOX
2017-06-06
02:00:37, Tue
OUTBOX
2017-06-06
02:03:52, Tue
INBOX
2017-06-06
02:04:40, Tue
INBOX
2017-06-06
02:12:49, Tue
OUTBOX
2017-06-06
02:22:58, Tue
INBOX
2017-06-06
02:23:22, Tue
INBOX
2017-06-06
02:39:16, 1 ue
OUTBOX
2017-06-06
10:04:22, Tue
INBOX
2017-06-06
10:06:11, Tue
OUTBOX
2017-06-06
10:17:02, Tue
INBOX
2017-06-06
10:24:00, Tue
OUTBOX
2017-06-06
10:37:05, Tue
INBOX
2017-06-06
11:11:43, Tue
OUTBOX
2017-06-06
11:13:10, Tue
INBOX
2017-06-06
11:14:03, Tue
OUTBOX
2017-06-06
11:15:01, Tue
INBOX
2017-06-06
11:15:18, Tue
INBOX
Not really. Just small timing questions along the way.
You should come meet M with me and
I can't be there that early. And why would I? I am just going to
drop them off. _;
Sit there while he reads. Thats what I'm planning to do.
\n\nllntil.he says, thanks, you can go.... _:
He is not going to have you sit there. At best vou'l I be in your cube
waiting for him to finish since they are and he
And ha, I had NO idea about all that DOJ classified space
restrictions. \n\nl'm going to have to research that... _
Dummy...
We German tourists aren't always that savvy
And who told Andrew about me? You?
A long time ago, so he probably doesn't remember. I'd guess
A aron. _
Ok now I'm not happy about the early morning doc delivery.
\U0001f62a\U0001f629 _
Aaron was under the assumption that you are in at 7:45 anyway,
did you not tell him that?_
That's sometimes aspirational, as you know. \U0001f60b
Ha. So you've got no one to blame but yourself. \U0001f60a
Double \U0001f60b
Hey do you have stuff to discuss at the 9:40 as well? Az seemed to
believe it was your meeting._
Ha. Not really but I'll come up with stuff. I said you had some
items (which is why I cautioned you last night to save some for
today) _
I didn't discuss any last night - but he thinks this is a you and he
meeting and I had to mention that I would be there too.
I specifically asked for the meeting in the context of you having
items to talk about that we didn't get to. I went through my list,
and we turn to the things you had, and I said I didn't know many
of them, and that we should all sit down and meet.
That's frustrating.
31
DOJ-PROD-0000361
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
Type
2017-06-06
11:15:32, Tue
INBOX
I'm happy to remind him.
sms
2017-06-06
11:15:42, Tue
OUTBOX
So you're going to have to level set the purpose when we sit
down.
sms
2017-06-06
11:15:45, Tue
OUTBOX
Yeah, thanks.
sms
2017-06-06
11:16:33, Tue
INBOX
1 will. One of the items is, legitimately, how to approach Andy
about the people that Bob is going to want a sign to the team.
That discussion has to occur before 1 go making any calls. Maybe
we can strategize about that.
sms
2017-06-06
11:18:54, Tue
OUTBOX
Why do you think Andy is going to care at all? I'm sure you can get
whomever you want. Do you mean whether Andy or bowdich
should tell the field offices first?
sms
2017-06-06
11:19:19, Tue
OUTBOX
And 1 think bowdich can make the calls to angry sacs. It certainly
doesn't need to be andy.
sms
2017-06-06
11:20:54, Tue
INBOX
All of those issues. Bowdich hasn't been part of the conversations
but absolutely. Bob tells Andy, Andy tells Dave make it happen.
sms
2017-06-06
11:23:53, Tue
OUTBOX
That's how 1 think think should go.
sms
2017-06-06
11:27:56, Tue
INBOX
OGCs gotta get done whatever work they need to do to satisfy
everyone at HQ. 1 want to start calling people this week to tell
them to plan on reporting on the 23rd
sms
2017-06-06
12:40:36, Tue
INBOX
Dropped off with Bob. Good. (Btw, was
already here at 745)\n\nHe closed the door to read.
\U0001f612\n\nWent and discussed and access and
strategy with and Good\n\nAaron came in, then Bob
pulled everyone but me into his morning meeting.
\U0001f612\n\nBefore closing the door, he said he'd get with me
in a bit; 1 asked him if that meant he wanted me to sit tight. He
<unidvp<; I'm at mv n ih(=
sms
2017-06-06
12:57:57, Tue
OUTBOX
How exceptionally irritating.
sms
2017-06-06
12:58:25, Tue
INBOX
Yep. \n\nStill waiting.
sms
2017-06-06
12:58:49, Tue
OUTBOX
Aaron and nave a call with me and at 9, so it has to
end soon.
sms
2017-06-06
12:59:12, Tue
INBOX
'Cause Murphys law, the minute 1 call.you, he'll free up
sms
2017-06-06
12:59:13, Tue
OUTBOX
No 1 got here at 8. Been in with Rybicki and
sms
2017-06-06
12:59:26, Tue
INBOX
Oh.
sms
2017-06-06
13:00:27, Tue
INBOX
Any consensus opinion about ? 1 told 3nd they
had to give a heads up about what you me and were doing.
sms
2017-06-06
13:02:14, Tue
OUTBOX
What do you mean consensus opinion?
sms
2017-06-06
13:02:31, Tue
OUTBOX
I'm not following this text at all.
sms
32
DOJ-PROD-0000362
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
Type
2017-06-06
13:02:48, Tue
OUTBOX
sms
2017-06-06
13:03:14, Tue
INBOX
a jerk;)
sms
2017-06-06
13:04:44, Tue
INBOX
Will explain when 1 see you. Too much for here
sms
2017-06-06
13:08:17, Tue
OUTBOX
I'll meet you at 930?
sms
2017-06-06
13:08:29, Tue
OUTBOX
In hq?
sms
2017-06-06
13:08:59, Tue
INBOX
Yep. If 1 'm done with Bob. They're still behind closed doors.
sms
2017-06-06
13:09:20, Tue
OUTBOX
They are going to be on this call until 930
sms
2017-06-06
13:11:11, Tue
INBOX
Oh. Didn't realize that's what they're doing. So should 1 just head
back?
sms
2017-06-06
13:11:34, Tue
INBOX
1 kind of want to send th message I'm notable to just sit around
for an hour
sms
2017-06-06
13:11:45, Tue
OUTBOX
1 think so.
sms
2017-06-06
13:11:59, Tue
OUTBOX
You've got a mtg with az at 940, over here.
sms
2017-06-06
13:15:09, Tue
INBOX
Yep. F A cl< it. told his EA 1 had a 930 at hq and 1 would find him
later. \n\n
sms
2017-06-06
13-18-03 Tue
INBOX
Done. Come to your office or mine?
sms
2017-06-06
Not sure.
13:19:04, Tue
OUTBOX
sms
2017-06-06
13:22:05, Tue
INBOX
Ok I'll just go to my office and start. 1 thought mtg with Aaron was
945
sms
2017-06-06
13:22:17, Tue
INBOX
Your meeting on track to end by 930?
sms
2017-06-06
13:22:34, Tue
OUTBOX
We are, for now. But who the f knows.
sms
2017-06-06
13:22:52, Tue
INBOX
You in your office with Stephen?
sms
2017-06-06
13:23:08, Tue
OUTBOX
In Stephen's ofc.
sms
2017-06-06
13:23:51, Tue
INBOX
Ok. Food just got done. I'll just go to my office.
sms
2017-06-06
16:44:21, Tue
OUTBOX
Hey call when you are off
sms
2017-06-06
17:03:03, Tue
INBOX
Sc mentioned it when Bill was there, but not the name.
That only went to Carl. \U0001f612
sms
2017-06-06
22:04:42, Tue
OUTBOX
For you and aaron.
sms
2017-06-06
22:05:27, Tue
INBOX
Yep he's on the phone right now, want me to call when he's off?
sms
2017-06-06
22:05:43, Tue
OUTBOX
Can you step out and call m
sms
33
DOJ-PROD-0000363
Date UTC
2017-06-06
22:05:48, Tue
2017-06-06
22:05:56, Tue
2017-06-06
22:36:47, Tue
2017-06-06
22:37:41, Tue
2017-06-06
22:38:33, Tue
2017-06-06
22:39:07, Tue
2017-06-06
22:39:50, Tue
2017-06-06
22:40:50, Tue
2017-06-06
22:41:34, Tue
2017-06-06
22:42:15, Tue_
2017-06-06
22:42:35, Tue
2017-06-06
22:46:07, Tue
2017-06-06
22:47:34, Tue
2017-06-06
22:50:12, Tue
2017-06-06
22:53:43, Tue
2017-06-06
22:54:51, Tue
2017-06-06
23:04:17, Tue
2017-06-06
23 :05:07, Tue
2017-06-06
23:08:47, Tue
2017-06-06
23:11:22, Tue
2017-06-06
23:17:14, Tue
2017-06-06
23:23:29, Tue
2017-06-06
23:28:36, Tue
2017-06-06
23:42:48, Tue
Type of Message
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
Body _
Or I can just ask ft if you want to send
Sigh. Still waiting to talk to Aaron....
Yeah, I'm about to leave. I'll touch base with Andy tomorrow.
Whatevs. _
Funny I'm right there with you.\n\nYou discuss working with
Andrew with him? _^_
Thanks, btw, for shagging that stuff for me with )
Yeah, though baker doesn't think that's the best place to land.
Why? A specific case vs generalist idea? Or Andrew/that case?
Aaron just told Dreeban we've set up a
Sure whatever.
More just that case. Just going to be a bunch of etc.
That's true re case. I think
is the place for you.
I think ' is
smack square in your wheelho use.
You're going to follow up with re sf86 restrictions on use,
yes?_ __
Yes. She just emailed that was not aware of any restriction
other than before affirmative use we seek OPM approval since
they own the info. _
And give JB credit, he's going through personnel issues and reach
back into CD and FBI and the rest of it.\n\n(And i suspect I owe
you some than ks fo r that \U0001f60a)
And JB I think gave you a plug at the end
Not following
A plug for what? And to whom?
A plug by JB about you to Aaron
Oh. I didn't realize that personnel convo was with aaron, not just
you. What's he say?
Oh it was just JB and Aaron. I only heard part of Aaron's side
Just Td you up for 702 education for the team (is it a
problem/litigation issue, do we need to avoid searching against it,
etc)
34
DOJ-PROD-0000364
Date UTC
Type of Message
iBodv
Type
2017-06-06
23:43:42, Tue
OUTBOX
might also be smart on the issue.
sms
2017-06-06
23:48:49, Tue
OUTBOX
How do you know baker was talking about me?
sms
2017-06-06
23:52:53, Tue
INBOX
Too long to explain here. Convo had turned to if things.
Aaron mentioned thoughts and structure of something 1 had
described. A couple of things were said,, and the convo was
wrapping up, then Aaron said she IS good or something to that
effect. J ust my gut.
sms
2017-06-07
00:16:46, Wed
OUTBOX
Oh geez, dreeben is going to explain than
any human on the planet.
sms
2017-06-07
00:18:21, Wed
INBOX
A word missing "better"?
sms
2017-06-07
00:26:36, Wed
INBOX
Finally leaving. 1 hope you're not still at work....
sms
2017-06-07
00:27:16, Wed
OUTBOX
Nope. 1 left at 7. Of course 1 ran into when he was
leaving. At 5:30.
sms
2017-06-07
02:31:24, Wed
INBOX
\U0001f60a\U0001f60a\nC) 1 have no idea who the two agents
are asked for. They're not associated with the team, and 1
may need to say "no." I'll do research and talk with her but 1 worry
they're NY, in the same way Andrew worried about NY agents.
And he had the sense to talk to me about what he wanted, and
balance his request against those already on the team.\nD)
curious the comment Andrew made as 1 stepped out, prompting
your 20 year agent comment. My sense was he wasn't necessarily
mms
2017-06-07
!} So just sit down and
09:59:50, Wed
OUTBOX
talk to her honestly about it. It's okay to say no, especially since
that subject NEEDS a strong Cl look as well.\nD) Jesus, relax about
the comment. Andrew had been making fun of himself, you
stepped out to make a call, Andrew said oh no, I've scared him. 1
said you're a 20 year agent, you're fine. It was all a joke. That's it.
sms
2017-06-07
10:43:06, Wed
OUTBOX
C) Been thinking. Let me prep the battlefield with first, like
1 did with Andrew.
sms
2017-06-07
10:43:42, Wed
OUTBOX
Who you are, why she can trust you, considerations to think
about.
sms
2017-06-07
10:44:26, Wed
OUTBOX
And jesus, did you see that the networks are carrying Comey's
testimony? Interrupting regular tv to broadcast...
sms
2017-06-07
10:45:07, Wed
INBOX
C) it's fine. 1 can do it - you and 1 have essentially the same
relationship with her whereas you know Andrew much much
better.
sms
2017-06-07
10:45:57, Wed
INBOX
1 was going to find her early and talk, truly, I'm not worried nor do
1 think it will be adversarial in the least. If you have personal
reasons for you and team to do it, that's a different story.
sms
35
DOJ-PROD-0000365
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
Type
2017-06-07
10:46:52, Wed
INBOX
It's truly going to be "the most watched Washington event since
Watergate."\n\nWhere are we watching (yes damn right I'm
watching with you)
sms
2017-06-07
10:47:54, Wed
OUTBOX
1 would just prefer to, gives me a reason to pop in and say hi too.
sms
2017-06-07
10:48:34, Wed
OUTBOX
1 think I'm watching with just quietly ir affice.
sms
2017-06-07
10:49:28, Wed
INBOX
My reluctance is 1 want her to see me as the lead -1 appreciate
you doing it with Andrew since he's close to.you, but 1 with her 1
guess I'd rather just directly have the conversation. Let's talk
sms
2017-06-07
10:49:51, Wed
INBOX
invited everyone to the D's conference room. Is not
going to be there?
sms
2017-06-07
10:51:32, Wed
OUTBOX
N( didn't. That is for today - Andy's hearing.
sms
2017-06-07
10:52:20, Wed
INBOX
Oh
sms
2017-06-07
10:52:22, Wed
OUTBOX
No one is going to mistake me for you as the lead, but that's fine.
sms
2017-06-07
10:54:06, Wed
INBOX
1 just have had email back and forth with her about it, as well as
with Aaron and the team on staffing, 1 don't want her to suddenly
think I'm inserting a proxy before we actually just sit down and
talk. Truly, 1 think I'd prefer to talk to her if that's ok.
sms
2017-06-07
10:55:27, Wed
INBOX
And I've gotta say I'm a little bummed about Dir C testimony. Is
what it is.
sms
2017-06-07
10:56:24, Wed
OUTBOX
Yup, it's fine.
sms
2017-06-07
10:57:12, Wed
OUTBOX
They don't want to make it a big scene viewing, which 1 get, but
would be understood. So and 1 had already discussed.
sms
2017-06-07
11:31:51, Wed
1 get, re t's going to be emotional for all of us.\n\nl'm
disappointed because i see a solid, unbroken line from mve to
announcement to :o election to momentous this
INBOX
sms
2017-06-07
11:34:56, Wed
OUTBOX
sms
2017-06-07
11:35:19, Wed
OUTBOX
sms
2017-06-07
11:54:32, Wed
INBOX
sms
2017-06-07
11:55:36, Wed
INBOX
50 work things to tell you. need to tell you back story
sms
2017-06-07
11:57:37, Wed
OUTBOX
I'm in the car if you want to talk.
sms
2017-06-07
12:01:27, Wed
INBOX
Wait 1
sms
2017-06-07
12:57:11, Wed
INBOX
Hey can you bring extra copies of the spreadsheet 1 printed for
you? Thanks
sms
36
DOJ-PROD-0000366
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body _
Type
2017-06-07
16:50:41, Wed
INBOX
Are yoy close or still waiting to link up with If you are, i
don't want to be a jerk and I'll wait. If not, I'm just going to head
over.
sms
2017-06-07
16:56:40, Wed
OUTBOX
We're not going over.
sms
2017-06-07
16:57:07, Wed
INBOX
Ok. You need me to do anything for you?
sms
2017-06-07
16:57:21, Wed
INBOX
(over there 1 mean)?
sms
2017-06-07
16:58:09, Wed
INBOX
Well actually wherever but you get my point.
sms
2017-06-07
16:59:54, Wed
INBOX
Great. My cube has literally 9 chairs in it now. \U0001f612
mms
2017-06-07
17:00:55, Wed
INBOX
Is cool with me? 1 know that wasn't the subject of stay
behind (at least 1 certainly hope it wasnt), just was getting a really
weird vibe from
sms
2017-06-07
17:18:05, Wed
INBOX
Oh good. really hard to read sometimes. This isn't me
wanting everyone to like me (though obviously 1 do) -1 just like
and respect a lot.
sms
2017-06-07
17:19:47, Wed
INBOX
Also - not for talking about engaging and (at least trying
to) doing interviews soon along the lines of what we discussed
earlier. 1 think is going to take on until they find
someone.
sms
2017-06-07
17:20:42, Wed
OUTBOX
Try to see if 1 am on that one, since 1 have no idea. \U0001f612
sms
2017-06-07
17:23:04, Wed
INBOX
1 know, Lis, 1 know. It's super frustrating. \n\nCan you come over
and just start hanging out? You need to just be here for the, hey,
you, can you run this down for me/let me do that for yous.
sms
2017-06-07
17:27:41, Wed
OUTBOX
Sure, 1 just don't have anything that 1 can really do over there.
sms
2017-06-07
17:31:14, Wed
INBOX
Aaron would like you and to explore
along the lines we discussed on that one answer
sms
2017-06-07
17:31:39, Wed
OUTBOX
Yeah 1 really think we need to.
sms
2017-06-07
17:31:48, Wed
INBOX
Aaron asked me to ask you and to take the lead on
drafting something and then discuss it.
sms
2017-06-07
17:32:04, Wed
INBOX
So see, yay, something for you to do. :)
sms
2017-06-07
17:32:14, Wed
OUTBOX
Yeah, amazing.
sms
2017-06-07
17:32:25, Wed
INBOX
talking to Aaron now
sms
2017-06-07
17:32:42, Wed
OUTBOX
Yeah, I'm in here. What mtg is he going to?
sms
2017-06-07
17:32:45, Wed
INBOX
Something about but I'll try and listen in to the follow on
sms
2017-06-07
20:18:03, Wed
INBOX
Where are physically now?
sms
37
DOJ-PROD-0000367
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
Type
2017-06-07
20:31:49, Wed
OUTBOX
Which ones? to the best of my
understanding.
sms
2017-06-07
20:34:57, Wed
INBOX
Yes. Ok, that's what Paul just briefed. 1 wasn't sure if the move to
office was inminent/going to happen.\n\nThey reaffirmed we
ultimately need to get them ,n\nThanks
sms
2017-06-07
20:42:06, Wed
OUTBOX
There is no move to ofc. Just can't be
without his approval.
sms
2017-06-07
20:45:58, Wed
INBOX
Oh. Perfectm
sms
2017-06-07
21:01:39, Wed
INBOX
You coming over here at all?
sms
2017-06-07
21:01:56, Wed
OUTBOX
Should 1?
sms
2017-06-07
21:05:46, Wed
INBOX
Unless you've got something going, i would. We're starting
obstruction team brief but just come. Sit in on whatever comes
next.
sms
2017-06-07
21:06:30, Wed
OUTBOX
1 mean, I've got lots of work to do. But okay.
sms
2017-06-07
21:06:57, Wed
OUTBOX
Who is in it?
sms
2017-06-07
21:08:32, Wed
INBOX
Don't then.
sms
2017-06-07
21:09:21, Wed
INBOX
I'm just saying, come over here and stick your head in. I've gotten
more the past couple of days after hours talking with Aaron and
then all day the past week and a half
sms
2017-06-07
21:09:36, Wed
INBOX
Was not suggesting it for any particular reason, just a dive in sort
of thing
sms
2017-06-07
21:10:02, Wed
INBOX
If you have work to do, I'd say do it.
sms
2017-06-07
23:06:11, Wed
OUTBOX
1 left. F it. There's no amount of time 1 can spend and finish
everything. Whatevs
sms
2017-06-07
23:22:12, Wed
INBOX
Hi. 1 know. I'm sorry. :(
sms
2017-06-08
09:50:10, Thu
INBOX
Dir C's gotta have some nervous anticipation
sms
2017-06-08
10:45:20, Thu
INBOX
Hey does his testimony actually start at 10 or 1030?
sms
2017-06-08
10:45:52, Thu
OUTBOX
10
sms
2017-06-08
10:50:24, Thu
INBOX
You ok? The trained investigator in me notes the sum total of four
words this morning. Still feeling unmoored?
sms
2017-06-08
10:58:02, Thu
OUTBOX
Yup. Super busy but with unclear purpose. It's the best.
sms
2017-06-08
11:18:15, Thu
INBOX
I'm firmly in the camp. Pete's take, pulling from my Army
days: embrace the suck.\n\nOrder will emerge, and specifically
for you. You're too good, too enegetic, too competent. \n\nJust
BE YOU. And trust. Yourself. The righteousness of all this, \n\nlt
will be OK. 1 pinky promise. Which is the opposite of tough guy
army sayings. I'm complex that way;)
sms
3S
DOJ-PROD-OOOQ368
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
Type
2017-06-08
12:02:02, Thu
INBOX
Yay. Got a commitment from He was a great case
agent on my squad.
sms
2017-06-08
12:52:36, Thu
INBOX
And I'm sitting outside the closed door waiting to get 2 minutes
before they all have their various 9:00s...\U0001f612
sms
2017-06-08
12:53:00, Thu
OUTBOX
Nice.
sms
2017-06-08
12:53:35, Thu
OUTBOX
Baker just told me about what Rybicki told you. You're going to
mention to Aaron, right?
sms
2017-06-08
12:54:16, Thu
INBOX
Yeah I'm feeling great about it.\n\nYes, it's one of the reasons I'm
waiting, cabana-boy style. \U0001f612\U0001f612\U0001f612
sms
2017-06-08
12:54:42, Thu
INBOX
You get my vm?
sms
2017-06-08
13:06:40, Thu
INBOX
And I'm still waiting \U0001f621
sms
2017-06-08
18:05:50, Thu
INBOX
1 assume there's nothing operational /I don't need to be on the
call?
sms
2017-06-08
18:06:06, Thu
INBOX
Because, again, who knows...
sms
2017-06-08
18:06:39, Thu
OUTBOX
Oh, don't worry. I'm not even on speaker. \U0001f612
sms
2017-06-08
18:07:36, Thu
INBOX
What?!? \U0001f61e\n\nGod 1 want to keep telling you to hang in
there but it's hard....
sms
2017-06-08
18:08:01, Thu
INBOX
Nevertheless. \n\nHang in there. \n\nYour country needs you.
sms
2017-06-08
18:09:14, Thu
OUTBOX
Nope. Sent me an email yesterday about the call be it deals with
his but here i am.
sms
2017-06-08
18:09:32, Thu
OUTBOX
Oh boy. Nope, you boys are going to need to soon...
sms
2017-06-08
18:09:37, Thu
OUTBOX
Illll
sms
2017-06-08
18:10:04, Thu
INBOX
Should 1 come in?
sms
2017-06-09
00:06:08, Fri
INBOX
Pis clr imsg. \n\nThanks for staying for personnel discussion.
sms
2017-06-09
00:35:03, Fri
INBOX
You up for a convo about ?
sms
2017-06-09
01:24:29, Fri
INBOX
Just got done talking tc Gosh I've been blessed to have
worked with great agents. \n\nThank you for reminding me all
those times that 1 wouldn't trade what I've done for a different
path. \U0001f636\n\nl don't always deserve the goodness that 1
have.
sms
2017-06-09
01:56:52, Fri
OUTBOX
Great ust called me to say that Rachel Maddow just listed by
name each of the people the Director listed as having discussed
the matter with, but she that 1 was the only one they hadn't
identified yet but that they were working on it. \U0001f612
sms
2017-06-09
01:58:59, Fri
INBOX
Oh crap
sms
39
DOJ-PROD-0000369
Date UTC
Type of Message
2017-06-09
01:59:02, Fri
INBOX
2017-06-09
01:59:10, Fri
INBOX
2017-06-09
02:00:54, Fri
INBOX
2017-06-09
02:01:17, Fri
INBOX
2017-06-09
02:01:26, Fri
INBOX
2017-06-09
02:02:15, Fri
INBOX
2017-06-09
02:02:59, Fri
INBOX
2017-06-09
02:04:49, Fri
OUTBOX
2017-06-09
02:05:31, Fri
OUTBOX
2017-06-09
02:07:24, Fri
INBOX
2017-06-09
02:07:37, Fri
INBOX
2017-06-09
02:07:51, Fri
OUTBOX
2017-06-09
02:08:05, Fri
OUTBOX
2017-06-09
02:10:10, Fri
INBOX
2017-06-09
02:10:54, Fri
INBOX
2017-06-09
02:15:20, Fri
OUTBOX
2017-06-09
02:17:45, Fri
OUTBOX
2017-06-09
02:19:22, Fri
INBOX
2017-06-09
02:20:02, Fri
OUTBOX
2017-06-09
06:53:10, Fri
INBOX
2017-06-09
06:57:35, Fri
INBOX j
2017-06-09
09:55:12, Fri
INBOX
2017-06-09
10:07:56, Fri
OUTBOX
Body
Won't take long.
Welcome to the club. \U0001f612
What's the immediate impact? Things i worried were, in
order:\nl) crazies\n2) enemies Iists\n3) subpoenas\n4) frivolous
lawsuits/foias\n\nFrankly, though, i wouldn't worry TOO much
a bout it. _ _
And you know anc know. But they might be cool
enough not to run your name. _
How are you feeling about it?
And we do need to discuss your role in
Not sure if I 'm overt hinking that. _
And \U0001f60a something for to.brag about and to be
roud of in a couple of generations._
I don't think I know a lot of enemies/crazies. Well, there is one
I'm sure they won't hesitate to out me. They outed
Who's the one?
Who's 5
You should be able to figure that out. \U0001f612
A) they did? I didn't know that\nB) ah. Got it. \U0001f614
So how are you feeling about it? Hopefully not too worried?
Not happy about it, but obviously nothing I can do about it.
Alright, I'm going
\n\nGotta talk at all hands
at 10 then at Agency at 1. Neither have anything to do with SC.
Doing too many things poorly. Life is great.
You should stay for the dull all hands. Sends a better message.
40
DOJ-PROD-0000370
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
Type
2017-06-09
10:12:21, Fri
INBOX
Yeah 1 guess.
sms
2017-06-09
10:12:57, Fri
INBOX
Didn't see your name in any news feeds. Hopefully they let it go.
Who knows.
sms
2017-06-09 10:21:4 INBOX
Imsg?
sms
2017-06-09
10:26:44, Fri
OUTBOX
Go ahead
sms
2017-06-09
12:12:29, Fri
INBOX
Still ok to imsg, or call?
sms
2017-06-09
12:30:40, Fri
OUTBOX
You can imsg.
sms
2017-06-09
12:34:53, Fri
INBOX
Crap of course 1 didn't bring that phone. Nothing urgent. Just a
convo with Bill, his feelings, and my general sense of this feeling
of unease permeating a lot more broadly than 1 was thinking
about.
sms
2017-06-09
12:42:25, Fri
INBOX
And my kick in the nuts rush for 2 minutes with Aaron and to
bring up things with Mueller before they walk in and shut the
door. \U0001f612\U0001f612\U0001f612\U0001f612
sms
2017-06-09
15:38:37, Fri
INBOX
Hi. Got a sec.
sms
2017-06-09
15:44:12, Fri
OUTBOX
I'm walking out of SC now. Stand by.
sms
2017-06-09
16:39:17, Fri
INBOX
No today
sms
2017-06-09
17:29:30, Fri
INBOX
Just got an Agency coin
sms
2017-06-09
17:29:56, Fri
INBOX
With Brennan's signature;)
sms
2017-06-09
18:11:59, Fri
INBOX
Hi. You go to R?
sms
2017-06-09
20:40:13, Fri
INBOX
This is what I'm talking about! Divide and conquer. And c'mon
wtf.
sms
2017-06-09
20:52:11, Fri
INBOX
Btw, we still haven't talked....He's outside swapping cars
sms
2017-06-09
22:06:13, Fri
INBOX
And just ran out like Cinderella about to hit midnight...
sms
2017-06-09
23:43:44, Fri
INBOX
Just leaving. This won't end well.
sms
2017-06-10
00:07:39, Sat
OUTBOX
What won't, your participation? And why so late, just when he
finally made time? Was Bob still there? 1 seem to remember that
Andy was going to some black tie affair honoring Mueller tonight..
sms
2017-06-10
00:13:38, Sat
INBOX
No, for the former D.\n\nJust talking through how to handle.
\n\nMueller left but said he didn't go to the dinner
sms
2017-06-10
00:14:21, Sat
OUTBOX
Oh god.
sms
2017-06-10
03:34:05, Sat
INBOX
Hey
sms
2017-06-10
15:49:47, Sat
OUTBOX
1 didn't understand you last comment about what he was angry
about. Just hit me up there when you can.
sms
41
DOJ-PROD-0000371
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
Type
2017-06-10
15:53:19, Sat
OUTBOX
Finally, 1 don't like not including that one person. He is NOT
recused. Bill should not be making that call for him. He can make
that decision himself. He always takes a conservative approach
and can be trusted to do the right thing.
sms
2017-06-10
18:39:09, Sat
OUTBOX
I'll call you back later.
sms
2017-06-10
18:39:28, Sat
OUTBOX
On a call, I'll call you back.
sms
2017-06-10
19:09:01, Sat
INBOX
Still talking? \U0001f636\n\nl'm still waiting for Aaron....
sms
2017-06-10
19:12:55, Sat
OUTBOX
Yes, 1 called Trisha, just to chat.
sms
2017-06-10
19:13:50, Sat
INBOX
God she cant get back soon enough... 1 hope she doesn't run off
with the rest of the mass exodus....
sms
2017-06-10
19:19:14, Sat
OUTBOX
Okay, I'm off.
sms
2017-06-10
19:32:57, Sat
INBOX
Talking to Aaron anc
sms
2017-06-10
19:33:35, Sat
INBOX
Will call you then Bill
sms
2017-06-11
02:48:23, Sun
INBOX
1 sent a dial in for tomorrow. We have to talk to him first.
sms
2017-06-11
02:48:51, Sun
INBOX
Given the publicity, 1 don't think we can get ssci to change dates
sms
2017-06-11
02:49:11, Sun
INBOX
Hi hi hi
sms
2017-06-11
02:50:40, Sun
OUTBOX
Is his open or closed?
sms
2017-06-11
02:51:01, Sun
INBOX
1 couldn't tell from reporting
sms
2017-06-11
17:50:55, Sun
INBOX
Eras work?
sms
2017-06-11
18:15:49, Sun
OUTBOX
Trying it now.
sms
2017-06-11
18:16:29, Sun
OUTBOX
Honestly 1 think it is a waste of talents to bring him to
the team...
sms
2017-06-11
18:21:47, Sun
OUTBOX
First attempt was a failure. :(
sms
2017-06-11
18:22:14, Sun
OUTBOX
On the very first screen, the bitlocker, what are you supposed to
enter?
sms
2017-06-11
18:38:07, Sun
OUTBOX
Officially didn't work. \UQQ01f621 I'm going in in an hour.
\U0001f620\U0001f620\U0001f620\U0001f620\U0001f620\U00
01f620\U0001f620\U0001f620
sms
2017-06-11
19:42:54, Sun
INBOX
I'm sorry
sms
2017-06-11
19:43:50, Sun
INBOX
1 think so too, re I'm going to talk to him anyway
sms
2017-06-11
19:44:40, Sun
INBOX
Sorry about the eras. Couldn't tell you what the steps are, it's
been that long...
sms
2017-06-11
19:46:27, Sun
OUTBOX
Yeah well I'm driving in now...
sms
42
DOJ-PROD-0000372
Date UTC
2017-06-11
19:50:15, Sun
2017-06-11
20:37:54, Sun
2017-06-11
20:58:22, Sun
2017-06-11
20:59:14,Sun
2017-06-11
21:03:44, Sun
2017-06-11
21:28:43, Sun
2017-06-11
21:29:03, Sun
2017-06-11
2 1:29 :35, Sun
2017-06-11
21:36:49, Sun
2017-06-11
21:43:51, Sun
2017-06-12
10:37:49, Mon
2017-06-12
10:42:48, Mon
2017-06-12
10:44:17, Mon
2017-06-12
11:26:39, Mon
2017-06-12
11:27:23, Mon
2017-06-12
11:30:08, Mon
2017-06-12
11:53:46, Mon
2017-06-12
12:07:37, Mon
2017-06-12
12:12:29, Mon
2017-06-12
12:23:50, Mon
2017-06-12
12:26:27, Mon
Type of Message
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
INBOX
INBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
OUTBOX
Body _ Type
I'm sorry. That sucks. Im trying to reach Aaron about
because we suck and won't have an answer until
Itomorrow. sms
Just talked to Bill, who had talked with Carl. Bill *thinks* Carl has
spoken with Andy. Bill and are going to make the call to
tomorrow then figure out how to get the material and
see what's on there.\n\nNow going to go track down Aaron...
Bill mentioned EADs and above are gone tomorrow at some
leadershi p retreat \U0001f612. You going to talk to Andy? _
Frankly gotta say I'm curious what's been relayed to him...
He is going too. But yes, I'll try to talk to him before hand.
| We need to get Baker to do some award presentation for
I agree.
Have five things I don't have the figures for. Maybe I'll come back
tonight..;_
I hope the meeting
between Aaron and Carl resolves some of my uncertainty / stress.
You shouldn't stay on, regardless of what happens.
You're right, of course. \n\nWhat are you thinking about you? No
change? _
I'm serious about you. Imagine the scene, head held high at the 30
day mark, just a string handshake and a good luck. As opposed to
a "can I pretty please sit in on these meetings?" F it Pete. You can
do better than this. _
I know. \U0001f614
Had the same thought when you sent me I don’t
want a significant portion of my time spent tracking down stuff
that should have been sent, or included, or invited, on behalf of
the investigators. _
Exactly. I honestly think it is an easy decision, regardless of what
comes next at Fbi.
I'm grumpy
Yup, join the club.
I am starting to hedge off of my certainly that you should go....
Yeah but I don't have great options. Maybe I can do this for a
43
DOJ-PROD-0000373
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
Type
2017-06-12
12:36:54, Mon
INBOX
Just talked to called yesterday, he was having a call
with Dave and Carl later about so someone clearly
decided to include him, which is good. \n\i hasn't talked to
him since, which isn't great, particularly with a call with
in 55 minutes. 7th floor in a vacuum....
sms
2017-06-12
22:19:41, Mon
INBOX
Hi sorry just saw this. In office with Aaron walked
in about 5 ago.
sms
2017-06-12
22:24:27, Mon
INBOX
And Jesus god is not concise
sms
2017-06-12
22:28:12, Mon
OUTBOX
Yeah, well kicked me out of the recap he was giving for
Mueller and
sms
2017-06-12
22:28:33, Mon
OUTBOX
That's what 1 was coming to say. And I'll tell you re your email
later.
sms
2017-06-12
22:28:49, Mon
INBOX
Jims
sms
2017-06-12
22:28:49, Mon
INBOX
Doors open stop by quick
sms
2017-06-13
00:51:31, Tue
INBOX
Hey anticipating you may be a bit so I'm going to Jet. Give me a
call, of course, eager to hear how it went.... :)
sms
2017-06-13
01:09:01, Tue
OUTBOX
Still in with him. Having a very good open convo. Thinking
plus He's on board, it's others who may
not vet be comfortable with the idea.
sms
2017-06-13
01:09:57, Tue
INBOX
Excellent! !! \U0001f60a\n\nOthers attys?
sms
2017-06-13
01:10:31, Tue
INBOX
Aaron's or Muellers?
sms
2017-06-13
01:10:51, Tue
OUTBOX
It would need to be mueller's to make sense.
sms
2017-06-13
01:10:54, Tue
OUTBOX
Stand by.
sms
2017-06-13
01:11:08, Tue
INBOX
Agreed. Is Bob ok with that?
sms
2017-06-13
01:31:52, Tue
INBOX
sms
2017-06-13
01:32:48, Tue
OUTBOX
Sorry. Walking out of SC now, but probably not smart to walk
down the street on my phone.
sms
2017-06-13
01:34:36, Tue
K.
sms
INBOX
2017-06-13
01:35:29, Tue
OUTBOX
We should talk now then be 1 have to go up to the ofc and lock up.
sms
2017-06-13
01:53:32, Tue
INBOX
Thinking about it, that was a really good conversation. It shows
me that Aaron trusts and respects you. :)
sms
2017-06-13
01:58:48, Tue
OUTBOX
Yeah, 1 think that's right. At least 1 hope so.
sms
2017-06-13
02:03:57, Tue
INBOX
Oh, for sure. \U0001f60a
sms
2017-06-13
02:04:28, Tue
OUTBOX
sms
2017-06-13
02:05:43, Tue
INBOX
sms
44
DOJ-PROD-0000374
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
Type
2017-06-13
09:09:44, Tue
Been up since 345. This is GREAT.\n\nRealized 1 need an answer
from Aaron/Mueller about my role. If I'm not in the
then im out. I'm frustrated that they're talking
INBOX
about all this restructuring and various : or you
(or anyone) and 1 can't, as lead fbi person, get an answer to a
auestion 1 asked a week aso.
sms
2017-06-13
12:30:57, Tue
OUTBOX
Ah. News just said police activity on constitution ave. Awesome.
sms
2017-06-13
12:32:51, Tue
INBOX
Super!\n\nAnd guess what! The 830 started! Without me!\n\nln
mitigation, it's still just bob Aaron and
sms
2017-06-13
12:43:45, Tue
INBOX
And double grumble. 1 just asked Aaron, hey can 1 attend Hill prep
at 5. Loooong pause. Then, "OK, 1 *think* that's fine. It's not going
to be what you think it is."\n\nHonestly, Lisa. \U0001f612
sms
2017-06-13
12:44:37, Tue
INBOX
I'm walking out. I'll wait to order. Just going to enjoy the morning
outside before it gets oppressively hot...
sms
2017-06-13
12:45:49, Tue
OUTBOX
1 know dude. 1 don't know what else to say.
sms
2017-06-13
19:26:05, Tue
INBOX
Whoops. Misfire. Back. Had a SC feeling he really needed
guidance. Which is fine. \n\nDid 1 miss anything?
sms
2017-06-13
23:50:01, Tue
INBOX
Just talked to aaron
sms
2017-06-13
23:50:24, Tue
OUTBOX
What's up? Just got home.
sms
2017-06-13
23:51:06, T ue
INBOX
It'll wait. Discussion of
sms
2017-06-13
23:51:36, Tue
INBOX
Need to talk to you before you talk to him so you know what 1 said
sms
2017-06-13
23:52:51, Tue
INBOX
(Which was nothing, but we need to coordinate)\n\nHe knows
who has them now but not how they got them
sms
2017-06-13
23:53:15, Tue
INBOX
My inclination is not to disclose who took them, but I'm not sure
about that.
sms
2017-06-13
23:53:35, Tue
OUTBOX
We can talk tomorrow.
sms
45
DOJ-PROD-0000375
Date UTC
Type of Message
2017-06-14
01:50:42, Wed
OUTBOX
2017-06-14
01:57:46, Wed
INBOX
2017-06-14
17:49:22, Wed
INBOX
2017-06-14
18:37:20, Wed
OUTBOX
2017-06-14
18:37:55, Wed
INBOX
2017-06-14
18:39:02, Wed
OUTBOX
2017-06-14
18:39:22, Wed
INBOX
2017-06-14
20:00:21, Wed
OUTBOX
2017-06-14
20:01:13, Wed
OUTBOX
2017-06-14
23:33:08, Wed
INBOX
2017-06-14
23:35:00, Wed
INBOX
2017-06-14
23:50:47, Wed
INBOX
2017-06-14
23:54:13, Wed
OUTBOX
2017-06-14
23:54:53, Wed
INBOX
2017-06-14
23:55:10, Wed
INBOX
2017-06-15
00:40:11, Thu
INBOX
2017-06-15
00:44:00, Thu
OUTBOX
2017-06-15
00:44:42, Thu
INBOX
2017-06-15
11:24:51, Thu
OUTBOX
2017-06-15
11:33:12, Thu
INBOX
2017-06-15
11:35:30, Thu
OUTBOX
2017-06-15
11:42:22, Thu
INBOX
Hey you still at lunch or OSC? Have a sec?
Hey there, sorry. Will be back at my desk in 2.
K I'll swing by. Couple of things before my 3
Just call? Everyone is going to be walking up before the 3.
Ok lync
Sorry, I've been over at SC since about 3:15.
Definitely had to fight back tears with
I just don't know what to do, Pete.
Gmail you something?
almost with Aaron.
Been talking to Bill since we got off the phone. He really thinks
insult go, provided I can be I'm the room. I told him about tonight
and that I just didn't see that happening. _
Nevermind re gmail
And again I return to the fact that you are having an hour long
conversation about whether you should go is completely asinine.
You misunderstand. I walked in there in the first thing I said was,
I've decided I shouldn't go and don't want to g o._
Bill then asked if I wanted to trade with him.
I know, \n\nl just dug the email draft out of deleted items and
sent it.
Thanks. \n\nSaw your politico article too. God help me I don't
think I can take much more of this. _
I know
Hey. See Aaron's email. My guess is that is intended to exclude
me, but let's discuss before you say anything. _
I didnt see you on the cc line (thanks Samsung \U0001f612) and
already told Aaron I would right now. I'll hedge in the wording and
say there may be adds/drops, \n\nl'm sure this came about in the
discussion I had the door closed in my face\U0001f621
Or because of the nyt story saying that SC seems to be pursuing
potus in light of these interviews. _ _
Wp had it first. And it's as likely to be leaking.
All of which I would have walked through, if I had been in the
room. Because, you know, media leaks and what I do for a living.
46
DOJ-PROD-0000376
2017-06-16
00:51:17, Fri
Date UTC
Type of Message
2017-06-15
11:43:32, Thu
OUTBOX
2017-06-15
18:10:53, Thu
OUTBOX
2017-06-15
18:48:23, Thu
OUTBOX
2017-06-15
18:53:32, Thu
OUTBOX
2017-06-15
19:01:10, Thu
INBOX
2017-06-15
19:46:48, Thu
INBOX
2017-06-15
19:48:16, Thu
INBOX
2017-06-15
20:14:16, Thu
INBOX
2017-06-15
20:39:59, Thu
OUTBOX
2017-06-15
20:40:50, Thu
INBOX
2017-06-15
20:42:54, Thu
INBOX
2017-06-15
20:43:25, Thu
OUTBOX
2017-06-15
23:10:16, Thu
INBOX
2017-06-15
23:10:41, Thu
OUTBOX
2017-06-15
23:11:23, Thu
INBOX
2017-06-15
23:11:40, Thu
OUTBOX
Body_
Oh yeah, that's right.
No, doing ethics training. Most everyone us here.
I'm walking out now if you still need to talk.
Never mind . Walking into my next mtg.
Dang sorry was in sioc. Walking back over
WP picked your name up in an online blog, citing Wired. "Right
Turn,"^9:15 today
And you're on
Wiki\n\nhttps://en.rn.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Special_Counsel_
or t he United States Department of Justice team _
Btw, your iPhone is here
Fley. Walking back now.
K. :)\n\n Talking to
wrapping up
but I think we're
I'm outside
God I'm so disappointed in us as an organization. I want to send
10 polygraphers to and poly the whole office. Or do every.
Single. Last. Employee ._
Because the thing with this one is we're SO bad that no one down
here (or a couple of people in CID) knew. So you could literally just
do the field office ._
So f it, let's do it.
Flave the A/DD pull the trigger....
Yeah well I hold no sway over that guy.
OUTBOX
47
DOJ-PROD-0000377
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
Type
2017-06-16
00:51:25, Fri
INBOX
Plus, that will get out, and go a long way in the court of public
opinion. Maybe. That, or evidence of just how fed up we are
sms
2017-06-16
00:52:05, Fri
INBOX
;aid we fired some n NY for leaking a
tew months ago. They sure were quiet about it.
sms
2017-06-16
02:54:09, Fri
OUTBOX
https://www.google.eom/amp/www.newyorker.com/magazine/2
017/05/l5/taking-down-terr™-'<^-m-court/amp
sms
2017-06-16
10:36:37, Fri
OUTBOX
The link is a HUGE profile of in the new Yorker from last
month.
sms
2017-06-16
10:37:22, Fri
OUTBOX
And the guardian has a ref to me now which is completely
exaggerated and overblown.
sms
2017-06-16
10:37:24, Fri
OUTBOX
Very
sms
2017-06-16
10:37:56, Fri
INBOX
Ooh! :) Link?
sms
2017-06-16
10:38:02, Fri
OUTBOX
Guardian suggests lama Russia OC expert. It's ridiculous.
sms
2017-06-16
10:39:02, Fri
INBOX
That's not necessarily good for you, from the perspective that
Russians and Russian OC people in particular aren't always nice.
Guess you can cross those plans to visit St Petersburg off the list...
sms
2017-06-16
10:46:01, Fri
INBOX
Hmm. Just read it. 1 understand the various motivations - both in
the media and maybe even Peter - but 1 also see various risks.
sms
2017-06-16
10:47:24, Fri
OUTBOX
1 sent it to Peter, said it was all wrong. He said he (obviously)
couldn't work with this outlet but to keep letting him know when
things are wrong.
sms
2017-06-16
10:47:36, Fri
INBOX
1 don't know how you correct it - realistically you probably dont.
And it would probably be a good thing
sms
2017-06-16
10:49:01, Fri
OUTBOX
What about 1 don't know anyone who knows
more than him.
sms
2017-06-16
10:49:06, Fri
INBOX
You saw you're in the print nyt, right?
sms
2017-06-16
10:49:30, Fri
INBOX
1 was talking prosecutors, but maybe. Can he be trusted?
sms
2017-06-16
10:50:12, Fri
OUTBOX
Yes. Absolutely. 1 thought he was actually
sms
2017-06-16
10:50:35, Fri
INBOX
I'll call him today.
sms
2017-06-16
11:34:06, Fri
OUTBOX
That profile on was massively long. Was up until 11:15
reading and still didn't finish.
sms
2017-06-16
11:35:41, Fri
INBOX
1 read a few paras and stopped
sms
2017-06-16
11:36:39, Fri
INBOX
Funny how flavors run. Clearly an "article 3 courts work" agenda.
Would have loved a tenth as much fawning from
sms
2017-06-16
11:58:43, Fri
OUTBOX
Yup. It's unbelievably fawning. And learned that she's exactly my
age. Maybe one more or less years as a lawyer. And is
the exact same year as me, 2006 law school grad.
sms
48
DOJ-PROD-0000378
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
Type
2017-06-16
12:05:29, Fri
INBOX
So you need to be And get an office.
\U0001f612
sms
2017-06-16
12:06:38, Fri
INBOX
And worry less about being REALLY good. \U0001f636
sms
2017-06-16
12:09:31, Fri
OUTBOX
Yeah, that's not happening. 1 think mostly 1 just need to get over
myself.
sms
2017-06-16
12:10:02, Fri
OUTBOX
Let go of the fact that I'm not going to be in the room for most
things and just accept that.
sms
2017-06-16
12:12:55, Fri
OUTBOX
1 also need to screw up the courage to tell Aaron about my
vacation. It's in less than two weeks and the house owner just said
phone reception isn't great there and has a landline for
emergencies.
sms
2017-06-16
12:24:52, Fri
INBOX
Re your vacation, I'd rip off that bandaid today. Want me to nudge
you?
sms
2017-06-17
02:07:00, Sat
INBOX
Also, They'll be more agreeable to get out for the
weekend.
sms
2017-06-17
02:09:02, Sat
OUTBOX
Yes, but not if we keep them until 5 in the summer.
sms
2017-06-17
02:11:27, Sat
INBOX
Fair point. Settles it. then.
sms
2017-06-17
02:11:42, Sat
OUTBOX
But yes, is where Aaron and 1 landed too.
sms
2017-06-17
02:19:15, Sat
INBOX
A) is right. \nB
sms
2017-06-17
02:20:43, Sat
OUTBOX
And nope lots of reasons is preferable.
sms
2017-06-17
B) Why Fri?\n\n
02:23:37, Sat
INBOX
sms
2017-06-18
17:11:15, Sun
OUTBOX
Aaron just called to say he had spoken to some people (nfi) and
had come up with a plan to have me fully integrated at and
asked me to give him two weeks to implement (ie
It's funny, because now 1 truly don't want it anymore, but 1 feel
like I'm stuck.
sms
2017-06-18
17:11:59, Sun
OUTBOX
1 must have really freaked him out on Friday when 1 told him 1
wanted to join the
sms
2017-06-18
17:31:31, Sun
INBOX
Hmm
sms
2017-06-18
17:33:53, Sun
INBOX
1 worry he's freaking out because he doesn't want to track all the
nickle-dime admin items that he hopes to give to you.\n\nDo YOU
want that?
sms
2017-06-18
17:35:04, Sun
INBOX
Did you tell him you really wanted on the When
he and 1 spoke earlier in the week, he said he really thought the
best place for you long term was
sms
2017-06-18
17:36:19, Sun
INBOX
Wonder what changed, \n\nl worry it's the FOIA yuck, with a
realization there will be a hundred things like that he doesn't
want.
sms
2017-06-18
17:38:02, Sun
INBOX
On my end, it's getting harder to let go as 1 get the access 1
wanted and build the team...\U0001f615\n\nDespite that, you
still think mv better plav is to go back?
sms
49
DOJ-PROD-0000379
Date UTC
Type of Message
Body
Type
2017-06-18
18:04:54, Sun
OUTBOX
No, 1 don't! 1 really had found acceptance of my decision! And
yeah, sure, I'll be in a couple of more meetings, but I'm still not 
Live Music Archive
Librivox Free Audio
Metropolitan Museum
Cleveland Museum of Art
Internet Arcade
Console Living Room
Books to Borrow
Open Library
TV News
Understanding 9/11